enprostil and Adenocarcinoma

The effects of gastrin (G-17), proglumide (a gastrin receptor antagonist), and enprostil (a synthetic analog of prostaglandin E2) used alone or in association were studied in colonic cancer Prob and Regb cell growth. The Prob (progressive in BD IX rats) and Regb (regressive) cell lines were cloned from a single chemically-induced rat colonic cancer. After a serum-free period corresponding to one doubling cell time, cells were incubated with 100 to 1,200 pM G-17, 40 or 80 mM proglumide, and 2.5 to 5 micrograms/ml enprostil for 8 h. Cell growth was measured 48 h later by colorimetric MTT assay. Two and four hundred pM G-17 gave a growth stimulation of 17.4 percent and 31 percent for Prob cells respectively or 35.5 percent and 49 percent for Regb cells. Growth stimulation was found to be statistically different (P less than 0.01) for Prob and Regb cells. Proglumide partially inhibited this growth stimulation whereas enprostil inhibited in totally. These results suggest that growth of some colonic cancer cell lines may be G-17 dependent. However the intensity of cell-growth stimulation depends on the level of cell malignancy or differentiation in a single tumor.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Animals; Colonic Neoplasms; Dimethylhydrazines; Drug Combinations; Enprostil; Gastrins; Proglumide; Rats; Stimulation, Chemical; Tumor Cells, Cultured

The effect of enprostil and the somatostatin analogue SMS 201 995 on the growth of a clonal variant of the human gastric adenocarcinoma cell line, MKN45, was studied. The derived cell line grew twice as fast as MKN45 when grown as a xenograft line in nude mice. However, it did not respond trophically to gastrin either in vitro or in vivo (unlike MKN45) although it possessed the same number of gastrin receptors as the parental line. Gastrin production by the cell line during in vitro culture was twice that of MKN45; thus, the cell line was denoted MKN45G. When MKN45G was grown as xenografts in nude mice (n = 10/group), enprostil (20 micrograms/kg/day) significantly inhibited tumour growth when administered continuously by an osmotic mini-pump from day 1 to day 7 of a 20-day experiment, and induced tumour regression when administered from day 7 to day 14. Enprostil reduced postprandial serum gastrin levels when administered from day 7 to day 14 and prevented gastrin release by MKN45 in vitro. SMS 201 995 at doses of 25 and 240 micrograms/kg/day induced tumour regression when administered from day 1 to day 7 and the former dose reduced post-prandial serum gastrin levels at day 5. Gastrin release by MKN45G was not affected by SMS 201 995 in vitro, thus its effect may not be mediated directly via gastrin, requiring interaction between other hormones or growth factors in the in vivo situation.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Animals; Cell Line; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Enprostil; Female; Gastrins; Humans; Male; Mice; Mice, Nude; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Transplantation; Octreotide; Prostaglandins E, Synthetic; Receptors, Gastrointestinal Hormone; Stomach Neoplasms; Time Factors; Tumor Cells, Cultured