enalaprilat-anhydrous and Renal-Artery-Obstruction

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition (ACEI) renography is the only imaging examination that tests directly for the presence of renovascular hypertension (RVH); other imaging examinations test only for the presence of renal artery stenosis (RAS). Consensus panels have recommended that ACEI renograms be interpreted as low, intermediate, or high probability for RVH. ACEI renography is highly accurate in patients with normal renal function and suspected RVH. In this patient population, the sensitivity and specificity of ACEI renography for RAS are approximately 90%; as an initial approach, angiography is not cost effective. Data from 10 studies evaluating cure or improvement in blood pressure in 291 patients undergoing revascularization showed the mean positive predictive value of ACEI renography to be 92%. When azotemic patients present with suspected RVH, as many as 50% of patients may have an intermediate probability ACEI renogram and the sensitivity of detecting RVH falls to approximately 80% even when intermediate and high probability tests are combined.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Captopril; Costs and Cost Analysis; Enalaprilat; Humans; Hypertension, Renovascular; Radioisotope Renography; Radiopharmaceuticals; Renal Artery Obstruction; Sensitivity and Specificity

Hypertension with renal artery stenosis is associated with both an activated renin-angiotensin system and elevated sympathetic activity. Therefore, in this condition it may be favorable to use a therapeutic modality that does not reflexly increase heart rate, renin secretion, and sympathetic nervous activity. The purpose of the present study was to assess overall, renal, and muscle sympathetic activity after short-term administration of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (enalaprilat) and a nonspecific vasodilator (dihydralazine) to hypertensive patients with renal artery stenosis. Forty-eight patients undergoing a clinical investigation for renovascular hypertension were included in the study. An isotope dilution technique for assessing norepinephrine spillover was used to estimate overall and bilateral renal sympathetic nerve activity. In 11 patients simultaneous intraneural recordings of efferent muscle sympathetic nerve activity were performed. Thirty minutes after dihydralazine administration, mean arterial pressure fell by 15%, whereas plasma angiotensin II, muscle sympathetic nerve activity, heart rate, and total body norepinephrine spillover increased (P<0.05 for all). In contrast, after enalaprilat administration a fall in arterial pressure similar to that for dihydralazine was followed by decreased angiotensin II levels and unchanged muscle sympathetic nerve activity, heart rate, and total body norepinephrine spillover, whereas renal norepinephrine spillover increased by 44% (P<0.05). Acute blood pressure reduction by an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor provokes a differentiated sympathetic response in patients with hypertension and renal artery stenosis, inasmuch that overall and muscle sympathetic reflex activation are blunted, whereas the reflex renal sympathetic response to blood pressure reduction is preserved.

Topics: Angiotensin II; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Pressure; Dihydralazine; Electrophysiology; Enalaprilat; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Hypertension, Renovascular; Male; Middle Aged; Muscle, Skeletal; Norepinephrine; Peroneal Nerve; Renal Artery Obstruction; Sympathetic Nervous System

Recent studies of renal artery stenosis (RAS) failed to demonstrate greater benefit from angioplasty in terms of blood pressure (BP) lowering than medical treatment. Not all RAS are haemodynamically significant and identification of patients likely to benefit from angioplasty remains essential.. We examined whether performing renal venous renin studies under stringent conditions might predict BP improvement. Patients with at least 60% RAS who underwent renal venous renin measurements in 2008-2013 were identified. Renal venous renin lateralization ratios (RVRRs) were calculated by dividing venous renin from the stenotic kidney with contralateral levels before and after stimulation with enalaprilat or captopril. Benefit was defined as BP less than 140/90  mmHg without medication, 10% decreased mean BP without increased daily defined doses (DDDs) or decreased DDD without a significant increase of mean BP.. Twenty-eight patients were treated medically and 42 with angioplasty (median age 60.1 years, 41% male, 29% chronic kidney disease, 50% resistant hypertension). At 11.4 ± 3.3 months, 69% of patients treated with angioplasty had BP benefit compared with 25% with medical treatment (P < 0.001). Logistic regression identified resistant hypertension [odds ratio (OR) 0.18, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.04-0.82, P = 0.03] and baseline DDD (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.48-0.98, P = 0.04) as being negatively associated, and positive stimulated RVRR (OR 21.6, 95% CI 3.50-133.3, P = 0.001) positively associated with benefit from angioplasty. On multivariate logistic regression, only stimulated RVRR positivity predicted BP benefit (OR 20.5, 95% CI 2.9-145.0, P = 0.003).. These findings suggest that a positive stimulated RVRR measured under optimal conditions may help to identify patients with RAS likely to improve from angioplasty.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Captopril; Enalaprilat; Female; Humans; Kidney; Male; Middle Aged; Renal Artery Obstruction; Renin; Retrospective Studies

Assessment of intrarenal doppler signals is of particular importance in screening for renal artery stenosis. We studied the effect of acute ACE-inhibition (1,25 mg enalaprilate i.v.) on intrarenal resistive indices in 10 hypertensive patients with unilateral renal artery stenosis versus 10 patients with essential hypertension. Any changes limited to poststenotic vessels could possibly improve the diagnostic value of duplex sonography. After ACE-inhibition a significant fall of the intrarenal Resistive Index occurred in both patient groups. In cases of unilateral renal artery stenosis we saw a tendency to an increased side difference of the Resistive Index due to a greater fall on the poststenotic side. Therefore a clear advantage of duplex scanning after acute ACE-inhibition due to a limited effect of enalaprilate on poststenotic vessels was not found. The results suggest that the vascular resistance and not only the degree of renal artery stenosis is of significance for the characteristics of the doppler signal.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Pressure; Enalaprilat; Female; Humans; Hypertension, Renovascular; Injections, Intravenous; Male; Middle Aged; Renal Artery Obstruction; Renal Circulation; Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex; Vascular Resistance

Our objective was to investigate whether the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalaprilat improves detection of hemodynamically significant renal artery stenoses in dogs. Renal artery stenoses of 50 to 99% were surgically created unilaterally in five dogs. Doppler ultrasonographic evaluation was performed at baseline (no stenosis), after creation of the stenosis, and after the administration of enalaprilat. The resistive index increased in the nonstenotic kidney (P < 0.01) but not in the stenotic kidney after administration of enalaprilat. The difference in resistive indices between nonstenotic and stenotic kidneys increased significantly (P < 0.05) after administration of enalaprilat. Measurement of the resistive index after administration of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor in humans may improve the performance of Doppler ultrasonography in detecting hemodynamically significant renal artery stenoses.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Dogs; Enalaprilat; Renal Artery Obstruction; Ultrasonography, Doppler; Vascular Resistance

The relationship between the renin-angiotensin system and erythropoietin was studied in twenty patients with renal artery stenosis and hypertension. Ten of the patients had a unilaterally activated renin-angiotensin system (group 1), while ten patients had not (group 2). Plasma erythropoietin was simultaneously measured in a brachial artery and both renal veins before and 5 and 30 min after an intravenous injection of 1.25 mg enalaprilat. The mean (+/- SD) arterial erythropoietin concentration was 27.3 +/- 16.8 mU/ml in group 1 and 14.1 +/- 11.3 mU/ml in group 2 patients (P less than 0.05). There was no significant change after enalaprilat i.v. in either group. The venous erythropoietin concentration in plasma from the stenotic kidney did not differ from that of the contralateral kidney. The higher erythropoietin concentration in group 1 patients may be explained by a systemic stimulatory effect of the renin-angiotensin system on erythropoietin production. As no side-differences were found, renal vein as well as peripheral erythropoietin measurements cannot be used as a tool in the diagnosis of the functional significance of a renal artery stenosis.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Enalaprilat; Erythropoietin; Female; Humans; Hypertension, Renovascular; Male; Middle Aged; Renal Artery Obstruction; Renal Veins; Renin-Angiotensin System

Topics: Adult; Enalaprilat; Female; Humans; Hypotension; Injections, Intravenous; Intraoperative Complications; Renal Artery Obstruction; Time Factors

This study was performed to determine divided renal efferent sympathetic nerve activity from kidneys in seven patients with renin-positive, unilateral renal artery stenosis before and 30 minutes after an acute intravenous dose of 1.25 mg enalaprilat. Renal norepinephrine release was calculated from split renal plasma flow, venoarterial plasma concentration gradients across the kidney, and the fractional extraction of tritiated norepinephrine. All patients had unilateral renin secretion, the affected kidney increasing its plasma renin activity gradient 1.7-fold, whereas no statistically significant change was noted on the contralateral side in response to enalaprilat. Total norepinephrine release to plasma and norepinephrine plasma clearance (assessed by isotope dilution) were similar before and after administration of enalaprilat (approximately 400 ng/min and 1.0 l/min), despite a 26% fall in mean arterial pressure (from 125 mm Hg, p less than 0.01). Heart rate remained unchanged. After enalaprilat, norepinephrine venoarterial difference increased in the renin-secreting kidney (from 264 to 396, SED = 57 pg/ml, p less than 0.05), whereas it increased only slightly in the contralateral kidney (from 149 to 256, SED = 72 pg/ml, NS). Tritiated norepinephrine extraction fell approximately 25% (p less than 0.01) in both kidneys. Thus, renal norepinephrine spillover increased from 49 to 62, SED = 9 ng/min (NS) and from 81 to 129, SED = 17 ng/min (p less than 0.05) from the affected and the contralateral kidney, respectively. Hence, in this relatively small study in patients with renovascular hypertension, no evidence for increased renal nerve activity could be observed in the affected kidney, despite its marked renin production.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Enalaprilat; Humans; Kidney; Norepinephrine; Renal Artery Obstruction; Renin