enalaprilat-anhydrous and Pulmonary-Edema

In a prospectively designed randomized study, we compared the efficacy of sublingual nitroglycerine and intravenous enalaprilat in the out-of-hospital treatment of 46 hypertensive patients with pulmonary edema (defined as rales over both lungs and systolic blood pressure > 200 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure > 100 mg). The out-of-hospital treatment consists of oxygen (6 Ll/min) via a face mask, furosemide 80 mg i.v., opioids 10 mg s.c., and either sublingual nitroglycerine (n = 23; initial dose: 0.8 mg; repetitive application of 0.8 mg every 10 min until a cumulative dose of 3.2 mg) or intravenous enalaprilat (initial dose: 2.5 mg; repetitive application of 2.5 mg every 30 min until a cumulative dose of 10 mg). The aim of the antihypertensive treatment was a reduction of systolic blood pressure below 160 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure below 90 mm Hg until admission to the emergency department. In the emergency room, an arterial and venous blood sample was taken to determine the respiratory (pO2, pCO2) and metabolic status (pH value; base-excess; serum lactate) of the patient. Successful antihypertensive treatment was observed in 13/23 (57%) patients of the enalaprilat group and 15/23 (65%) patients of the nitroglycerine group (p = 0.54). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure on admission were similar in both treatment groups (systolic RR: enalaprilat: 179 [31] mm Hg; nitroglycerine: 184 [38] mm Hg; p = 0.59; diastolic RR: enalaprilat: 96 [14] mm Hg; nitroglycerine: 101 [14] mm Hg; p = 0.12). No significant differences were observed between the enalaprilat and the nitroglycerine groups concerning respiratory and metabolic parameters on admission (pO2: 67 [15] vs. 64 [17] mm Hg; p = 0.50; pCO2: 46 [9] vs. 47 [13]; p = 0.75; pH value: 7.27 [0.12] vs. 7.27 [0.09]; p = 0.98; BE: -4.2 [3.7] vs. -5.7 [4.1]; p = 0.23; lactate: 4.2 [3.3] vs. 4.2 [2.7]; p = 0.98). Intravenous enalaprilat did not exhibit any advantage compared to nitroglycerine in terms of blood pressure reduction or respiratory and metabolic parameters on admission to the emergency room. We conclude that enalaprilat is no substitute for nitroglycerine in the out-of-hospital treatment of hypertensive patients with pulmonary edema.

Topics: Administration, Sublingual; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Pressure; Emergency Medical Services; Enalaprilat; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Middle Aged; Nitroglycerin; Oxygen; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Edema; Treatment Outcome; Vasodilator Agents

Converting enzyme inhibitors meet most of the criteria required to be used in acute pulmonary edema. However, they could also induce deleterious effects on renal function and electrolytes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single intravenous 2-hour infusion of enalaprilat (1 mg) after an acute pulmonary edema.. This was a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study performed in 20 congestive heart failure patients (New York Heart Association class III or IV). Systemic and regional hemodynamic parameters, biological parameters, and blood gases were measured before and repeatedly after the onset of infusion. Compared with placebo, enalaprilat decreased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (-37% versus -10%, P = .001), diastolic and mean systemic blood pressures (-21% versus 0%, P = .009, and -18% versus -1%, P = .026, respectively), diastolic and mean pulmonary blood pressures (-21% versus -8%, P = .040; -18% versus -9%, P = .046), and brachial and renal resistances (-44% versus -14%, P = .017, and -22% versus -2%, P = .014, respectively); increased brachial and renal blood flows (+77% versus +8%, P = .036, and +12% versus 0%, P = .043, respectively), arterial oxygen tension (+2% versus -16%, P = .041), and arterial oxygen saturation (+1% versus -2%, P = .045); and tended to decrease rate-pressure product (-19% versus -7%, P = .076), increase brachial artery diameter (+13% versus 0%, P = .081), and improve intrapulmonary shunt (-18% versus +16%, P = .080). Enalaprilat did not affect cardiac output or carotid or hepatosplanchnic hemodynamics.. Early administration of enalaprilat is effective and well tolerated in acute pulmonary edema.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Double-Blind Method; Enalaprilat; Female; Gases; Heart Failure; Hemodynamics; Hormones; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Male; Placebos; Pulmonary Circulation; Pulmonary Edema

Neurogenic pulmonary edema (NPE ) was indicative of poor prognosis in the epidemic of enterovirus 71 infections. The pathogenesis of NPE remains poorly understood. The objectives of this experimental study were to explore whether RAS is activated during NPE in rabbit models induced by fibrin and the effects of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (enalaprilat) on NPE.. NPE models were induced by intracisternal injection of fibrinogen and thrombin. According to random number table method, 18 healthy adult New Zealand rabbits were assigned to three groups (with 6 in each) : normal control group (Con group), NPE group and enalaprilat treated (Ena) group. After establishment of NPE models, rabbits in Ena group were given intravenous enalaprilat 0.5 mg/kg. Expression of ACE,ACE2,AT1R mRNA of the lung tissue were evaluated by real-time polymerise chain reaction; and Ang II of the lung tissue was determined by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay ( ELISA ). Meanwhile, histopathological lung injury scores were evaluated.. ACE mRNA expression level in NPE group ( 17.2 ± 3.3) appeared an increasing trend in contrast to Con group ( 12.6 ± 5.2 ) and Ena group ( 11.5 ± 2.4, both P > 0.05 ). Compared with Con group (81 ± 22 ), ACE2 mRNA expression levels of NPE group ( 52 ± 6 ) and Ena group ( 45 ± 13 ) both decreased ( both P < 0.05 ) . ACE mRNA/ACE2 mRNA expression levels of NPE group ( 0.33 ± 0.06 ) and Ena group ( 0.26 ± 0.04 ) were higher than those of Con group ( 0.16 ± 0.05, both P < 0.05 ), as well as the ratio of Ena group decreased compared with untreated NPE group ( 0.26 ± 0.04 vs. 0.33 ± 0.06, P < 0.05 ) . There were no statistically significant differences in expression of AT1 mRNA of the lung tissue among three groups, but Ena group ( 4.8 ± 1.1) in contrast to NPE group ( 6.7 ± 1.3) has no significant difference (P > 0.05). Lung AngII level of NPE group [(540 ± 147) pg/ml] was significantly higher than that of Con group [(253 ± 37 ) pg/ml] and Ena group [(309 ± 35 ) pg/ml, both P < 0.05 ]. Gross pathologic examination showed that pink foamy edema fluid appeared in the tracheal tubes in NPE group, but spontaneously appeared in neither Con group nor Ena group; and the level of pulmonary subpleural bleeding in Con group, 12 graded 0; in NPE group, 2 graded II, 10 graded III; in Ena group, 2 graded, 8 grade II, 2 grade III. The histopathologic lung injury scores in Ena group was decreased in contrast to NPE group (1.36 ± 0.26 vs.2.32 ± 0.49, P < 0.05) and mainly for the improvement of alveolar overdistension and interstitial edema.. The present study showed that when NPE occurs, a high lung AngII concentration was associated with an imbalance between ACE mRNA to ACE2 mRNA expression level. Activated local RAS in lung tissue resulted in lung injury. Enalaprilat treatment may attenuate lung injury by interventing local RAS in lung tissue with decreased ratio of ACE mRNA to ACE2 mRNA and lung AngII concentration. The result will be significant for the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor used in the theatment of NPE.

Topics: Angiotensin II; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Disease Models, Animal; Enalaprilat; Female; Fibrinogen; Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic; Lung; Male; Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A; Pulmonary Edema; Rabbits; Random Allocation; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction; RNA, Messenger