enalapril and Diabetic-Retinopathy

Diabetes management has increasingly focused on the prevention of macrovascular disease, in particular for type 2 diabetes. Diabetic retinopathy, one of the main microvascular complications of diabetes, is also an important public health problem. Much of the care invested in retinopathy relates to treatment rather than prevention of disease. Tight glycaemic and blood pressure control helps to reduce the risk of retinopathy, but this is not easy to achieve in practice and additional treatments are needed for both primary and secondary prevention of retinopathy. A renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has been identified in the eye and found to be upregulated in retinopathy. This has led to specific interest in the role of RAS blockade in retinopathy prevention. The recent DIRECT programme assessed use of the angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) candesartan in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Although the primary trial end-points were not met, there was a clear trend to less severe retinopathy with RAS blockade. A smaller trial, RASS, reported reduced retinopathy progression in type 1 diabetes from RAS blockade with both the ARB losartan and the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor enalapril. The clinical implications of these new data are discussed.

Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Retinopathy; Enalapril; Humans; Losartan; Renin-Angiotensin System; Tetrazoles

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the structural and functional effects of systemic oxygen therapy and enalapril in patients with diabetic macular ischemia (DMI). This randomized clinical trial consisted of 105 eyes with DMI divided into three groups. Group I received systemic oxygen by face mask at a flow rate of 10 L/min; Group II received 5 mg enalapril daily; and Group III received placebo tablets for 3 months. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT), extent of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) on fluorescein angiograms, and electroretinograms (ERG) were obtained at baseline and after 3 and 6 months. Overall, 102 patients completed the study. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different among groups. Significant improvement in BCVA and decrease in CMT and FAZ occurred at months 3 and 6 in oxygen group compared to deterioration in enalapril and control groups (All P values <0.001). ERG parameters were significantly better in oxygen group compared to enalapril group at months 3 and 6 and better than those in control group at month 3. Normobaric oxygen therapy for 3 months in DMI decreased CMT and FAZ and improved BCVA and ERG parameters. Enalapril did not show any favorable effect.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Diabetic Retinopathy; Enalapril; Female; Humans; Ischemia; Macula Lutea; Macular Edema; Male; Middle Aged; Oxygen; Retinal Diseases; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Visual Acuity

Optimal glycemic control slows diabetic retinopathy (DR) development and progression and is the standard of care for type 1 diabetes. However, these glycemic goals are difficult to achieve and sustain in clinical practice. The Renin Angiotensin System Study (RASS) showed that renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade can slow DR progression. In the current study, we evaluate whether glycemic control influenced the benefit of RAS blockade on DR progression in type 1 diabetic patients.. We used RASS data to analyze the relationships between two-steps or more DR progression and baseline glycemic levels in 223 normotensive, normoalbuminuric type 1 diabetic patients randomized to receive 5 years of enalapril or losartan compared with placebo.. A total of 147 of 223 patients (65.9%) had DR at baseline (47 of 74 patients [63.5%] in placebo and 100 of 149 patients [67.1%] in the combined treatment groups [P = 0.67]). Patients with two-steps or more DR progression had higher baseline A1C than those without progression (9.4 vs. 8.2%, P < 0.001). There was no beneficial effect of RAS blockade (P = 0.92) in patients with baseline A1C ≤7.5%. In contrast, 30 of 112 (27%) patients on the active treatment arms with A1C >7.5% had two-steps or more DR progression compared with 26 of 56 patients (46%) in the placebo group (P = 0.03).. RAS blockade reduces DR progression in normotensive, normoalbuminuric type 1 diabetic patients with A1C >7.5%. Whether this therapy could benefit patients with A1C ≤7.5% will require long-term studies of much larger cohorts.

Topics: Adult; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetic Retinopathy; Enalapril; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Losartan; Male; Renin-Angiotensin System; Young Adult

Nephropathy and retinopathy remain important complications of type 1 diabetes. It is unclear whether their progression is slowed by early administration of drugs that block the renin-angiotensin system.. We conducted a multicenter, controlled trial involving 285 normotensive patients with type 1 diabetes and normoalbuminuria and who were randomly assigned to receive losartan (100 mg daily), enalapril (20 mg daily), or placebo and followed for 5 years. The primary end point was a change in the fraction of glomerular volume occupied by mesangium in kidney-biopsy specimens. The retinopathy end point was a progression on a retinopathy severity scale of two steps or more. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed with the use of linear regression and logistic-regression models.. A total of 90% and 82% of patients had complete renal-biopsy and retinopathy data, respectively. Change in mesangial fractional volume per glomerulus over the 5-year period did not differ significantly between the placebo group (0.016 units) and the enalapril group (0.005, P=0.38) or the losartan group (0.026, P=0.26), nor were there significant treatment benefits for other biopsy-assessed renal structural variables. The 5-year cumulative incidence of microalbuminuria was 6% in the placebo group; the incidence was higher with losartan (17%, P=0.01 by the log-rank test) but not with enalapril (4%, P=0.96 by the log-rank test). As compared with placebo, the odds of retinopathy progression by two steps or more was reduced by 65% with enalapril (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14 to 0.85) and by 70% with losartan (odds ratio, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.73), independently of changes in blood pressure. There were three biopsy-related serious adverse events that completely resolved. Chronic cough occurred in 12 patients receiving enalapril, 6 receiving losartan, and 4 receiving placebo.. Early blockade of the renin-angiotensin system in patients with type 1 diabetes did not slow nephropathy progression but slowed the progression of retinopathy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00143949.)

Topics: Adult; Albuminuria; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetic Nephropathies; Diabetic Retinopathy; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Enalapril; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Kidney Glomerulus; Logistic Models; Losartan; Male; Mesangial Cells; Renin-Angiotensin System; Retina

To examine the association of ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and ambulatory pulse rate (APR) with diabetic retinopathy (DR) in persons with type 1 diabetes in the Renin-Angiotensin System Study (RASS), a multicenter primary diabetic nephropathy (DN) prevention trial.. Cross-sectional study.. One hundred ninety-four normotensive RASS participants in 3 centers who are 16 years of age or older with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) of 2 to 20 years' duration.. Ambulatory blood pressure and APR were monitored using standardized protocols. Patients were defined as nondippers if the night-to-day ratios for both systolic and diastolic blood pressures were >0.9. Diabetic retinopathy was determined by masked grading of 30 degrees color stereoscopic fundus photographs of 7 standard fields using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study severity scale.. Severity of DR.. No DR was present in 32%, mild nonproliferative DR (NPDR) was present in 55%, and moderate to severe NPDR or proliferative DR was present in 13% of the cohort. Neither 24-hour systolic ABP or diastolic ABP, daytime systolic or diastolic ABP, nor nighttime diastolic ABP were related to severity of DR. Statistically significant associations were found between nighttime systolic ABP and mean ABP and DR. Among those with no DR, 19% were nondippers; for those with mild NPDR, 28% were nondippers; and for those with severe NPDR or proliferative DR, 36% were nondippers (P = 0.08). The ratio of nighttime to daytime APR, but not the 24-hour APR or daytime or nighttime APR, was related positively to the severity of DR. In multivariable analyses, only the nighttime systolic ABP was related to severity of DR (P<0.05).. These data suggest that ABP, especially during the night, may provide a better measure than clinical BP regarding the relationship of BP to the severity of retinopathy in normotensive persons with type 1 DM without clinical DN.

Topics: Adult; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetic Nephropathies; Diabetic Retinopathy; Double-Blind Method; Enalapril; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Heart Rate; Humans; Losartan; Male; Renin-Angiotensin System

Although several important studies have been performed in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients, it is not known whether lowering blood pressure in normotensive (BP <140/90 mm Hg) patients offers any beneficial results on vascular complications. The current study evaluated the effect of intensive versus moderate diastolic blood pressure (DBP) control on diabetic vascular complications in 480 normotensive type 2 diabetic patients.. The current study was a prospective, randomized controlled trial in normotensive type 2 diabetic subjects. The subjects were randomized to intensive (10 mm Hg below the baseline DBP) versus moderate (80 to 89 mm Hg) DBP control. Patients in the moderate therapy group were given placebo, while the patients randomized to intensive therapy received either nisoldipine or enalapril in a blinded manner as the initial antihypertensive medication. The primary end point evaluated was the change in creatinine clearance with the secondary endpoints consisting of change in urinary albumin excretion, progression of retinopathy and neuropathy and the incidence of cardiovascular disease.. The mean follow-up was 5.3 years. Mean BP in the intensive group was 128 +/- 0.8/75 +/- 0.3 mm Hg versus 137 +/- 0.7/81 +/- 0.3 mm Hg in the moderate group, P < 0.0001. Although no difference was demonstrated in creatinine clearance (P = 0.43), a lower percentage of patients in the intensive group progressed from normoalbuminuria to microalbuminuria (P = 0.012) and microalbuminuria to overt albuminuria (P = 0.028). The intensive BP control group also demonstrated less progression of diabetic retinopathy (P = 0.019) and a lower incidence of strokes (P = 0.03). The results were the same whether enalapril or nisoldipine was used as the initial antihypertensive agent.. Over a five-year follow-up period, intensive (approximately 128/75 mm Hg) BP control in normotensive type 2 diabetic patients: (1) slowed the progression to incipient and overt diabetic nephropathy; (2) decreased the progression of diabetic retinopathy; and (3) diminished the incidence of stroke.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Albuminuria; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Diabetic Nephropathies; Diabetic Neuropathies; Diabetic Retinopathy; Disease Progression; Enalapril; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nisoldipine; Prospective Studies; Single-Blind Method; Stroke

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is thought to be instrumental in the progression of diabetic retinopathy. Indications exist that the renin-angiotensin system is involved in VEGF overexpression. We assessed the vitreous VEGF concentrations in patients and related them to anti-hypertensive treatment, with special interest in the use of ACE-inhibitors.. Samples of vitreous fluid (10-80 microl) were obtained from 39 patients both with Type I (insulin-dependent) and Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus and 11 non-diabetic patients undergoing intra-ocular surgery. The VEGF-A concentrations were assessed by immunoassay.. Control patients and patients without proliferative diabetic retinopathy ( n = 8) had low and comparable VEGF concentrations (medians < 50 pg/ml). In contrast, patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy ( n = 31) had high vitreous VEGF concentrations (median 1134 pg/ml), which showed a negative correlation with the use of ACE inhibiting medication (Spearman rank-R = - 0.54; p = 0.002, n = 13). Diastolic and systolic blood pressure did not differ significantly between the two subgroups with proliferative diabetic retinopathy, i. e. those patients receiving ACE-inhibition (medians 88/160 mm Hg, respectively) and the others (90/160). For the mostly used ACE-inhibitor in the proliferative diabetic retinopathy group, i. e. enalapril ( n = 8), a linear dose-effect relation was observed (-20 +/- 4 pg x ml(-1) x mg(-1) x day(-1); p = 0.024; coefficient +/- SEM).. Treatment with ACE-inhibitors attenuates retinal overexpression of VEGF-A in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy, probably by interference with a local effect of angiotensin II.

Topics: Adult; Age of Onset; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Pressure; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Retinopathy; Enalapril; Endothelial Growth Factors; Female; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Lymphokines; Male; Middle Aged; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors; Vitreous Body

The Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes (ABCD) Trial is a prospective randomized blinded clinical trial that compares the effects of intensive versus moderate blood pressure control on the incidence and progression of type 2 diabetic complications. The current article discusses the results of 5.3 years of follow-up of 470 patients with hypertension and evaluates the effects of intensive and moderate blood pressure therapy using nisoldipine versus enalapril as the initial antihypertensive medication for nephropathy, retinopathy, and neuropathy.. The 470 hypertensive subjects, defined as having a baseline diastolic blood pressure of > or = 90 mmHg, were randomized to intensive blood pressure control (diastolic blood pressure goal of 75 mmHg) versus moderate blood pressure control (diastolic blood pressure goal of 80-89 mmHg).. The mean blood pressure achieved was 132/78 mmHg in the intensive group and 138/86 mmHg in the moderate control group. During the 5-year follow-up period, no difference was observed between intensive versus moderate blood pressure control and those randomized to nisoldipine versus enalapril with regard to the change in creatinine clearance. After the first year of antihypertensive treatment, creatinine clearance stabilized in both the intensive and moderate blood pressure control groups in those patients with baseline normo- or microalbuminuria. In contrast, patients starting with overt albuminuria demonstrated a steady decline in creatinine clearance of 5-6 ml.min-1.1.73 m-2 per year throughout the follow-up period whether they were on intensive or moderate therapy. There was also no difference between the interventions with regard to individuals progressing from normoalbuminuria to microalbuminuria (25% intensive therapy vs. 18% moderate therapy, P = 0.20) or microalbuminuria to overt albuminuria (16% intensive therapy vs. 23% moderate therapy, P = 0.28). Intensive therapy demonstrated a lower overall incidence of deaths, 5.5 vs. 10.7%, P = 0.037. Over a 5-year follow-up period, there was no difference between the intensive and moderate groups with regard to the progression of diabetic retinopathy and neuropathy. In addition, the use of nisoldipine versus enalapril had no differential effect on diabetic retinopathy and neuropathy.. Blood pressure control of 138/86 or 132/78 mmHg with either nisoldipine or enalapril as the initial antihypertensive medication appeared to stabilize renal function in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients without overt albuminuria over a 5-year period. The more intensive blood pressure control decreased all-cause mortality.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Diabetic Nephropathies; Diabetic Neuropathies; Diabetic Retinopathy; Enalapril; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Nisoldipine; Placebos

The ABCD (Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes) Trial is a large, prospective, randomized clinical trial of 950 patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) designed to compare the effects of intensive blood pressure control with moderate control on the prevention and progression of diabetic nephropathy, retinopathy, cardiovascular disease, and neuropathy in NIDDM. The secondary objective is to determine equivalency of the effects of a calcium channel blocker (nisoldipine) and an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (enalapril) as a first-line antihypertensive agent in the prevention and/or progression of these diabetic vascular complications. The study consists of two study populations aged 40-74 years, 470 hypertensive patients (diastolic blood pressure of > or = 90.0 mmHg at time of randomization) and 480 normotensive patients (diastolic blood pressure of 80.0 mmHg at time of randomization). The study duration is 5 years and is scheduled to end in May of 1998. Patients are randomized to receive either intensive antihypertensive drug therapy or moderate antihypertensive drug therapy. Patients are also randomized to nisoldipine or enalapril, with open-label medications added if further blood pressure control is necessary. The primary outcome measure is glomerular filtration rate as assessed by 24-h creatinine clearance. Secondary outcome measures are urinary albumin excretion, left ventricular hypertrophy, retinopathy, and neuropathy. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality will also be evaluated. Given the data showing the impact of hypertension on complications in NIDDM, the ABCD Trial is designed to determine if intensive antihypertensive therapy will be more efficacious than moderate antihypertensive therapy on the outcome of diabetic complications in NIDDM.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Albuminuria; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Diabetic Neuropathies; Diabetic Retinopathy; Enalapril; Exercise; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Nisoldipine; Prospective Studies; Sex Characteristics

To compare the effects of nifedipine and enalapril on carbohydrate and lipoprotein metabolism in Chinese non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients with hypertension.. A 12-week, double-blind, randomized study of plasma lipid levels and glycemic control in patients treated with nifedipine (n = 52) or enalapril (n = 50) was conducted. None of the patients were treated with insulin. Diet and dosages of oral hypoglycemic agents remained unchanged during the 12-week treatment period.. Mean arterial pressure was reduced more by nifedipine than by enalapril (23.1 vs. 11.1 mmHg, P < 0.001). Similar reductions in body mass index and plasma triglycerides and increases in apolipoprotein A-I were seen with both treatments, but HbA1 was reduced more during treatment with enalapril than with nifedipine (0.49 vs. 0.20%, P = 0.035) and serum apolipoprotein B (apoB) also declined more with enalapril than with nifedipine (8.2 vs. 2.3 mg/dl, P = 0.009).. Twelve weeks of treatment with enalapril in hypertensive NIDDM patients was associated with greater improvement in glycemic control and greater reduction in serum apoB concentration, although the reduction in blood pressure was less than with nifedipine. These changes in cardiovascular risk profile warrant investigation for a longer term.

Topics: Apolipoprotein A-I; Apolipoproteins B; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; China; Cholesterol; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Creatinine; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Retinopathy; Double-Blind Method; Enalapril; Fructosamine; Glycated Hemoglobin; Hexosamines; Hong Kong; Humans; Hypertension; Lipids; Nifedipine; Triglycerides

Arterial hypertension and proteinuric nephropathy are common features in diabetic patients. In streptozotocin-diabetic rats, it has been possible to reduce the blood pressure and proteinuria by converting enzyme inhibitors, and so slowing the decline of kidney function. These results have been confirmed in diabetic patients affected by arterial hypertension and persistent proteinuria. However, up to now it has not been clear if these favorable renal effects are related specifically to converting enzyme inhibition. In the attempt to clarify this last point, from a practical as well as from a speculative point of view, 12 type 2 diabetic outpatients affected by mild to moderate arterial hypertension and persistent macroalbuminuria (greater than 250 mg/daily, at least on three consecutive occasions) without any other signs of renal diseases were studied. In a randomized sequence and in a double blind fashion, after a washout period of 3 weeks, the patients underwent pharmacological treatment which consisted of enalapril 20 mg o.d., chlorthalidone 12.5 mg o.d., atenolol 50 mg o.d. and placebo o.d. Each treatment lasted 45 days. Kidney function, blood pressure and heart rate were checked at the beginning and at the end of each treatment, while urinary albumin excretion was measured at the end of the 4th, 5th, and 6th week of each treatment. Blood pressure significantly decreased in a similar fashion after each active treatment, while kidney function did not change significantly. Urinary albumin excretion rate significantly decreased after enalapril and atenolol, but did not change after chlorthalidone. According to these results we can hypothesize that the inhibition of tissue angiotensin formation and its related change on the glomerular permeability, rather than renal and systemic hemodynamic features, seem to be the common mechanisms by which both enalapril as well as atenolol decrease the albuminuria in our patients.

Topics: Atenolol; Blood Pressure; Chlorthalidone; Chronic Disease; Diabetic Nephropathies; Diabetic Retinopathy; Double-Blind Method; Enalapril; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Kidney; Male; Middle Aged; Proteinuria

Angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), erythropoietin, and angiopoietin play important roles in the development of diabetic retinopathy. However, the suppression of a single factor does not inhibit angiogenesis completely. This study simultaneously evaluated the expression of several angiogenic factors in the retinas of diabetes-induced rats and determined the effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (enalapril) on the expression of angiogenic factors.. Diabetes was chemically induced by injecting 14 of 21 Sprague-Dawley rats with streptozotocin. After induction of diabetes, enalapril (10 mg/kg) was administered orally to seven rats. The rats were divided into normal, diabetes mellitus (DM), and enalapril-treated groups (each group, n = 7). The eyeballs were removed at 8 weeks after the induction of diabetes, and the retinal expression of VEGF, the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)3/5, erythropoietin, and angiopoietin were examined using immunohistochemistry, RT-PCR, and Western blotting.. RT-PCR revealed that the expression of VEGF, VEGF receptors, STAT3, erythropoietin, erythropoietin receptor, STAT5, angiopoietin 2, and Tie2 mRNA increased in the DM group, whereas angiopoietin 1 expression decreased. The enalapril-treated group showed no increase in mRNA expression of angiogenic factors. Immunohistochemical staining and Western blotting showed that the expression of VEGF, STAT3, and erythropoietin receptor proteins increased in the DM group but not in the enalapril-treated group. Erythropoietin and angiopoietin proteins were not detected by immunohistochemical staining or Western blotting. STAT5 protein expression was detected only in the DM group using immunohistochemical staining and Western blotting. The mRNA expression of the angiogenic factors VEGF, erythropoietin, and angiopoietin 2 increased in the DM group but not in the enalapril-treated group. In contrast, angiopoietin 1 mRNA expression decreased in the DM group.. Enalapril treatment prevented increased angiogenic factor levels in the retinas of experimentally induced diabetic rats.

Topics: Angiogenic Proteins; Angiopoietin-1; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Blood Glucose; Blotting, Western; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Diabetic Retinopathy; Enalapril; Erythropoietin; Immunoenzyme Techniques; Male; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; RNA, Messenger; STAT3 Transcription Factor; STAT5 Transcription Factor; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

To evaluate the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) in retarding progression of severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) in normotensive type 2 diabetic patients.. This was a retrospective case control study of 128 patients with normotensive type 2 diabetes with lower than +1 dipstick proteinuria and severe NPDR who were classified into either an ACE-I treated group (Enalapril maleate 10 mg, n=12 , Ramipril 5 mg, n=17) or an ACE-I untreated group (n=99). Medical records were reviewed for endpoints of (a) occurrence of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) or macular edema (ME) for which laser phototherapy was necessary or (b) development of proteinuria of higher than +1 level requiring medication of ACE-I.. From the total of 128 patients, there were 29 ACE-I treated patients and 99 ACE-I untreated patients. There were no differences in the average age, duration of diabetes, body mass indices, blood pressure and levels of hyperglycemia or HbA1C between the two groups. Blood pressure and HbA1C levels in both groups remained unchanged during the study. The mean follow-up period was 41.6 months. In the ACE-I group, 6 patients progressed to PDR, 5 to ME and 6 developed proteinuria of greater than +1 over the follow-up period. In the control group, 30 patients progressed to PDR, 6 to ME and 9 developed proteinuria of greater than +1 over the follow-up period.. Small doses of ACE-I did not yield any beneficial effects in retarding the progression of severe NPDR.

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Case-Control Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Retinopathy; Disease Progression; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Enalapril; Female; Fundus Oculi; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ramipril; Retrospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Failure