enalapril and Diabetes-Mellitus

Angiotensin II and other components of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) have a central role in the pathogenesis and progression of diabetic renal disease. A study in patients with type 1 diabetes and overt nephropathy found that RAAS inhibition with angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors was associated with a reduced risk of progression to end-stage renal disease and mortality compared with non-RAAS-inhibiting drugs. Blood-pressure control was similar between groups and proteinuria reduction was responsible for a large part of the renoprotective and cardioprotective effect. ACE inhibitors can also prevent microalbuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes who are hypertensive and normoalbuminuric; in addition, ACE inhibitors are cardioprotective even in the early stages of diabetic renal disease. Angiotensin-II-receptor blockers (ARBs) are renoprotective (but not cardioprotective) in patients with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy or microalbuminuria. Studies have evaluated the renoprotective effect of other RAAS inhibitors, such as aldosterone antagonists and renin inhibitors, administered either alone or in combination with ACE inhibitors or ARBs. An important task for the future will be identifying which combination of agents achieves the best renoprotection (and cardioprotection) at the lowest cost. Such findings will have major implications, particularly in settings where money and facilities are limited and in settings where renal replacement therapy is not available and the prevention of kidney failure is life saving.

Topics: Albuminuria; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetic Nephropathies; Disease Progression; Enalapril; Humans; Hypertension; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Nisoldipine; Predictive Value of Tests; Renin-Angiotensin System

Recent intervention trials failed to show a significant decrease in mortality of ischemic heart disease in hypertensive patients given pharmacological treatment. These results led to a reassessment of cardiovascular risks of antihypertensive drugs per se and particularly diuretics. Captopril and Enalapril, antihypertensive drugs acting as converting enzyme inhibitors, might have some theoretical advantage over other antihypertensive drugs. The chronic ACE inhibitors therapy does not compromise glucose, lipid and urate and it seems not to be persistent in long-term administration.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Glucose; Cholesterol; Diabetes Mellitus; Enalapril; Humans; Hypertension; Lipids; Triglycerides; Uric Acid

Background The association between blood pressure (BP) control and incident diabetes mellitus remains unknown. We aim to investigate the association between degree of time-averaged on-treatment systolic blood pressure (SBP) control and incident diabetes mellitus in hypertensive adults. Methods and Results A total of 14 978 adults with hypertension without diabetes mellitus at baseline were included from the CSPPT (China Stroke Primary Prevention Trial). Participants were randomized double-masked to daily enalapril 10 mg and folic acid 0.8 mg or enalapril 10 mg alone. BP measurements were taken every 3 months after randomization. The primary outcome was incident diabetes mellitus, defined as physician-diagnosed diabetes mellitus, or use of glucose-lowering drugs during follow-up, or fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL at the exit visit. Over a median of 4.5 years, a significantly higher risk of incident diabetes mellitus was found in participants with time-averaged on-treatment SBP 130 to <140 mm Hg (10.3% versus 7.4%; odds ratio [OR], 1.37; 95% CI, 1.15‒1.64), compared with those with SBP 120 to <130 mm Hg. Moreover, the risk of incident diabetes mellitus increased by 24% (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.00‒1.53) and the incidence of regression to normal fasting glucose (<100 mg/dL) decreased by 29% (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57‒0.89) in participants with intermediate BP control (SBP/diastolic blood pressure, 130 to <140 and/or 80 to <90 mm Hg), compared with those with a tight BP control of <130/<80 mm Hg. Similar results were found when the time-averaged BP were calculated using the BP measurements during the first 6- or 24-month treatment period, or in the analysis using propensity scores. Conclusions In this non-diabetic, hypertensive population, SBP control in the range of 120 to <130 mm Hg, compared with the 130 to <140 mm Hg, was associated with a lower risk of incident diabetes mellitus.

Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure Determination; China; Diabetes Mellitus; Double-Blind Method; Enalapril; Fasting; Female; Folic Acid; Humans; Hypertension; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Propensity Score; Risk

A fixed-dose combination therapy (polypill strategy) has been proposed as an approach to reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease, especially in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). The PolyIran study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of a four-component polypill including aspirin, atorvastatin, hydrochlorothiazide, and either enalapril or valsartan for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.. The PolyIran study was a two-group, pragmatic, cluster-randomised trial nested within the Golestan Cohort Study (GCS), a cohort study with 50 045 participants aged 40-75 years from the Golestan province in Iran. Clusters (villages) were randomly allocated (1:1) to either a package of non-pharmacological preventive interventions alone (minimal care group) or together with a once-daily polypill tablet (polypill group). Randomisation was stratified by three districts (Gonbad, Aq-Qala, and Kalaleh), with the village as the unit of randomisation. We used a balanced randomisation algorithm, considering block sizes of 20 and balancing for cluster size or natural log of the cluster size (depending on the skewness within strata). Randomisation was done at a fixed point in time (Jan 18, 2011) by statisticians at the University of Birmingham (Birmingham, UK), independent of the local study team. The non-pharmacological preventive interventions (including educational training about healthy lifestyle-eg, healthy diet with low salt, sugar, and fat content, exercise, weight control, and abstinence from smoking and opium) were delivered by the PolyIran field visit team at months 3 and 6, and then every 6 months thereafter. Two formulations of polypill tablet were used in this study. Participants were first prescribed polypill one (hydrochlorothiazide 12·5 mg, aspirin 81 mg, atorvastatin 20 mg, and enalapril 5 mg). Participants who developed cough during follow-up were switched by a trained study physician to polypill two, which included valsartan 40 mg instead of enalapril 5 mg. Participants were followed up for 60 months. The primary outcome-occurrence of major cardiovascular events (including hospitalisation for acute coronary syndrome, fatal myocardial infarction, sudden death, heart failure, coronary artery revascularisation procedures, and non-fatal and fatal stroke)-was centrally assessed by the GCS follow-up team, who were masked to allocation status. We did intention-to-treat analyses by including all participants who met eligibility criteria in the two study groups. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01271985.. Between Feb 22, 2011, and April 15, 2013, we enrolled 6838 individuals into the study-3417 (in 116 clusters) in the minimal care group and 3421 (in 120 clusters) in the polypill group. 1761 (51·5%) of 3421 participants in the polypill group were women, as were 1679 (49·1%) of 3417 participants in the minimal care group. Median adherence to polypill tablets was 80·5% (IQR 48·5-92·2). During follow-up, 301 (8·8%) of 3417 participants in the minimal care group had major cardiovascular events compared with 202 (5·9%) of 3421 participants in the polypill group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·66, 95% CI 0·55-0·80). We found no statistically significant interaction with the presence (HR 0·61, 95% CI 0·49-0·75) or absence of pre-existing cardiovascular disease (0·80; 0·51-1·12; p. Use of polypill was effective in preventing major cardiovascular events. Medication adherence was high and adverse event numbers were low. The polypill strategy could be considered as an additional effective component in controlling cardiovascular diseases, especially in LMICs.. Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Barakat Foundation, and Alborz Darou.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticholesteremic Agents; Antihypertensive Agents; Aspirin; Atorvastatin; Blood Pressure; Cardiovascular Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cholesterol, LDL; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Combinations; Enalapril; Female; Humans; Hydrochlorothiazide; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Secondary Prevention; Valsartan

Because of concerns about the safety of aliskiren in patients with diabetes, study treatment was stopped prematurely in the Aliskiren Trial of Minimizing OutcomeS for Patients with HEart failuRE (ATMOSPHERE). We examined outcomes and treatment effect in these patients compared with those without diabetes.. ATMOSPHERE included 7016 patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) randomly assigned to enalapril plus aliskiren, aliskiren alone, or enalapril. At baseline, 1944 (27.7%) patients had diabetes. Median follow-up was shorter in patients with diabetes compared with those without (24 months vs. 46 months). Among patients with diabetes, the primary endpoint of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure occurred in 216 patients (33.1%) in the enalapril group (reference), 172 (27.4%) in the aliskiren group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-1.00; P = 0.053], and 196 (29.5%) in the combination group (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.71-1.04; P = 0.13). The effects of the treatments studied did not differ significantly compared with patients without diabetes. In patients with diabetes, aliskiren monotherapy was associated with a lower risk of symptomatic hypotension compared to enalapril [42 (6.7%) vs. 65 (10.0%); P = 0.04], whereas other adverse events were generally balanced between the three groups.. In patients with HFrEF and diabetes, there was no signal of harm and a trend towards benefit when direct renin inhibition monotherapy was compared with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, whereas combined aliskiren and enalapril treatment led to more adverse events with no improvement in outcomes. Treatment effects did not differ in patients with diabetes compared with those without. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00853658.

Topics: Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cause of Death; Diabetes Mellitus; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enalapril; Europe; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Fumarates; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Survival Rate

The aim of the present post hoc analysis of the China Stroke Primary Prevention Trial (CSPPT) was to evaluate the effect of folic acid supplementation on the risk of new-onset diabetes in hypertensive adults in China.. In all, 20 702 hypertensive adults with no history of stroke and/or myocardial infarction (MI) were randomly assigned to receive double-blind daily treatment with tablets containing either: (i) 10 mg enalapril and 0.8 mg folic acid (n = 10 348); or (ii) 10 mg enalapril alone (n = 10 354). New-onset diabetes was defined as either self-reported physician-diagnosed diabetes or the use of glucose-lowering drugs during the follow-up period of the CSPPT.. Over a median treatment duration of 4.5 years, new-onset diabetes occurred in 198 (2.0%) and 214 (2.1%) subjects in the enalapril-folic acid and enalapril groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-1.12). Similar results were observed when analyses were limited to subjects with baseline fasting glucose (FG) <7.0 mmol/L (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.62-1.14). Furthermore, there was no significant group difference in: (i) the risk of new-onset FG ≥7.0 mmol/L (defined as FG <7.0 at baseline and ≥7.0 mmol/L at the last visit; relative risk [RR] 1.07; 95% CI 0.96-1.20); or (ii) the composite of new-onset diabetes or new-onset FG ≥7.0 mmol/L (RR = 1.06; 95% CI 0.95-1.19).. Among adults with hypertension with no history of stroke and/or MI in China, folic acid supplementation had no significant effect on the risk of new-onset diabetes.

Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; China; Diabetes Mellitus; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enalapril; Female; Folic Acid; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Vitamin B Complex

The prevalence of pre-diabetes mellitus and its consequences in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction are not known. We investigated these in the Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) trial.. We examined clinical outcomes in 8399 patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction according to history of diabetes mellitus and glycemic status (baseline hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c]: < 6.0% [< 42 mmol/mol], 6.0%-6.4% [42-47 mmol/mol; pre-diabetes mellitus], and ≥ 6.5% [≥ 48 mmol/mol; diabetes mellitus]), in Cox regression models adjusted for known predictors of poor outcome. Patients with a history of diabetes mellitus (n = 2907 [35%]) had a higher risk of the primary composite outcome of heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular mortality compared with those without a history of diabetes mellitus: adjusted hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.25 to 1.52; P < 0.001. HbA1c measurement showed that an additional 1106 (13% of total) patients had undiagnosed diabetes mellitus and 2103 (25%) had pre-diabetes mellitus. The hazard ratio for patients with undiagnosed diabetes mellitus (HbA1c, > 6.5%) and known diabetes mellitus compared with those with HbA1c < 6.0% was 1.39 (1.17-1.64); P < 0.001 and 1.64 (1.43-1.87); P < 0.001, respectively. Patients with pre-diabetes mellitus were also at higher risk (hazard ratio, 1.27 [1.10-1.47]; P < 0.001) compared with those with HbA1c < 6.0%. The benefit of LCZ696 (sacubitril/valsartan) compared with enalapril was consistent across the range of HbA1c in the trial.. In patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, dysglycemia is common and pre-diabetes mellitus is associated with a higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes (compared with patients with no diabetes mellitus and HbA1c < 6.0%). LCZ696 was beneficial compared with enalapril, irrespective of glycemic status.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01035255.

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; Enalapril; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Heart Failure; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Prediabetic State; Prevalence; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Single-Blind Method; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

To: (i) describe the baseline characteristics of patients in ATMOSPHERE and the changes in the planned analysis of ATMOSPHERE resulting from the mandated discontinuation of study treatment in patients with diabetes; (ii) compare the baseline characteristics of patients in ATMOSPHERE with those in the Prospective comparison of Angiotensin Receptor neprilysin inhibitors with Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and morbidity in Heart Failure trial (PARADIGM-HF); and (iii) compare the characteristics of patients with and without diabetes at baseline in ATMOSPHERE.. A total of 7063 patients were randomized into ATMOSPHERE April 2009-April 2014 at 755 sites in 43 countries. Their average age was 63 years and 78% were men. ATMOSPHERE patients were generally similar to those in PARADIGM-HF although fewer had diabetes, renal dysfunction, and were treated with a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. In ATMOSPHERE, patients with diabetes differed in numerous ways from those without. Patients with diabetes were older and had worse heart failure status but a similar left ventricular ejection fraction (mean 28%); they had a higher body mass index and more co-morbidity, especially hypertension and coronary heart disease. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was slightly lower in those with diabetes compared with those without.. ATMOSPHERE will determine whether patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (particularly those without diabetes) benefit from the addition of a direct renin inhibitor to standard background therapy, including an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, beta-blocker, and a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. ATMOSPHERE will also determine whether aliskiren alone is superior to, or at least non-inferior to, enalapril.

Topics: Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Cardiovascular Agents; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enalapril; Female; Fumarates; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Renin; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Haemorheological changes have been described in hypertension as well as in diabetes mellitus. Antihypertensive treatment improves rheology in hypertensive patients. The aim of this study was to describe the haemorheological profile and its impact on shear stress in hypertensive type 2 diabetes mellitus patients (HT + DM) and to investigate the effect of antihypertensive therapy on blood rheology using a double-blind randomized protocol, comparing the calcium antagonist amlodipine with the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor enalapril. A total of 144 patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes (64 of transversal study and 80 of randomized clinical trial) were compared with 92 controls belonging to a transversal study. Secondarily, in a separate analysis, therapeutic effects of calcium antagonist amlodipine and ACE inhibitor enalapril were compared in a longitudinal, randomized trial in the patients. We assessed whole-blood viscosity, plasma viscosity, partial and total disaggregation times, haematocrit and fibrinogen. Radial artery systolic flow velocity was measured by pulsed Doppler. Shear stress was calculated as the product of flow velocity x whole-blood viscosity. Compared with controls, patients had significantly higher whole-blood viscosity for all shear rates (P < 0.001) as well as higher arterial diameter and systolic blood flow velocity (2.8 +/- 0.3 vs. 2.6 +/- 0.3 mm, P < 0.001; and 50.8 +/- 11.6 vs. 45.6 +/- 9.8 cm/s, P = 0.01, respectively). Whole-blood viscosity at shear rate gamma = 128/s tended to increase with amlodipine (+1.13%) and decrease with enalapril (-2.47%) (P = 0.028 for inter-group difference). In hypertensive diabetic patients, hyperviscosity contributes to increased shear stress. Haemorheological disturbances in these patients are not significantly influenced by blood pressure lowering with antihypertensive therapy by ACE inhibitor enalapril or calcium antagonist amlodipine. Other factors potentially contributing to rheology and arterial changes may be more critical in HT + DM patients and need further investigation.

Topics: Amlodipine; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Flow Velocity; Blood Pressure; Blood Viscosity; Calcium Channel Blockers; Diabetes Mellitus; Double-Blind Method; Enalapril; Female; Hemorheology; Humans; Hypertension; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Stress, Mechanical

To define efficacy and safety of enarenal in patients with arterial hypertension (AH).. A total of 235 physicians from 13 towns of Russia and 4291 patients aged 30-70 years with AH of the first-second degree (60% women) participated in the trial. Patients with AH of the second degree were older, more frequently had obesity, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia.. Target blood pressure (TBP) was achieved in 69.5% patients. The target was more frequently achieved in AH of the first degree (87.6%) than of the second (51.4%), in the first degree AH it was achieved with the same frequency in men and women. In AH of the second degree the success with TBP achievement was more frequent in men. Obesity decreased treatment efficacy only in women (TBP was achieved in 88.3% and 79.6% normal and obese women, respectively. Smoking had no effect on the treatment efficacy. In diabetes mellitus systolic blood pressure target (< 140 mm Hg) was seen in 54.2%, < 130 mm Hz--in 28.6%, by diastolic pressure (< 90 mm Hz)--in 88% patients, < 80 mm Hg--in 57%. The response was evaluated according to 5-score scale (from bad to good). The treatment improved the condition of the patients from 2.83 to 3.59 scores after 4 weeks of therapy and to 4.04 after 8 weeks of therapy. Side effects were not registered in 77.6% patients, only 1.9% patients discontinued the drug because of toxicity.. Enarenal, generic of enalapril, demonstrated efficacy comparable to that of the other ACE inhibitors, good tolerance and is recommended for treatment of hypertension.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Pressure; Diabetes Mellitus; Enalapril; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hyperlipidemias; Hypertension; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Russia; Treatment Outcome

To assess the impact of immediate versus delayed antihypertensive treatment on the outcome of older patients with isolated systolic hypertension, we extended the double-blind placebo-controlled Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) trial by an open-label follow-up study lasting 4 years.. The Syst-Eur trial included 4695 randomized patients with minimum age of 60 years and an untreated blood pressure of 160-219 mmHg systolic and below 95 mmHg diastolic. The double-blind trial ended after a median follow-up of 2.0 years (range 1-97 months). Of 4409 patients still alive, 3517 received open-label treatment consisting of nitrendipine (10-40 mg daily) with the possible addition of enalapril (5-20 mg daily), hydrochlorothiazide (12.5-25 mg daily), or both add-on drugs. Non-participants (n = 892) were also followed up.. Median follow-up increased to 6.1 years. Systolic pressure decreased to below 150 mmHg (target level) in 2628 participants (75.0%). During the 4-year open-label follow-up, stroke and cardiovascular complications occurred at similar frequencies in patients formerly randomized to placebo and those continuing active treatment. These rates were similar to those previously observed in the active-treatment group during the double-blind trial. Considering the total follow-up of 4695 randomized patients, immediate compared with delayed antihypertensive treatment reduced the occurrence of stroke and cardiovascular complications by 28% (P = 0.01) and 15% (P = 0.03), respectively, with a similar tendency for total mortality (13%, P = 0.09). In 492 diabetic patients, the corresponding estimates of long-term benefit (P < 0.02) were 60, 51 and 38%, respectively.. Antihypertensive treatment can achieve blood pressure control in most older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Immediate compared with delayed treatment prevented 17 strokes or 25 major cardiovascular events per 1000 patients followed up for 6 years. These findings underscore the necessity of early treatment of isolated systolic hypertension.

Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Diabetes Mellitus; Dihydropyridines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enalapril; Europe; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Failure; Humans; Hydrochlorothiazide; Hypertension; Incidence; Linear Models; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Nitrendipine; Stroke; Survival Rate; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The authors investigated in a one-year multicentric open study the effect of enalapril (Enalapril Lachema-Pliva) in 653 patients with mild to moderate hypertension treated in ambulance of 128 general practitioners and specialists in internal medicine. The blood pressure was checked after 6 weeks during the first six months and every 3 months during the second six months. Normal levels of diastolic pressure were achieved in 576 (82%) patients, whereby a combination of antihypertensive drugs had to be used in 383 (59%) patients. Complete renal functions were assessed in 51 patients, microalbuminuria declined from 91.8+/- 37.8 to 72.1 +/- 13.1 mg/l (p < 0.001), glomerular filtration was not affected. Parameters of insulin sensitivity were assessed in 117 patients, the complete lipid spectrum in 253 patients. IRI declined from 12.29 +/- 5.40 to 11.57 +/- 5.42 (p = 0.06) and glycosylated haemoglobin from 6.98 +/- 2.39 to 6.69 +/- 1.97 (p = 0.03), which slows improved insulin sensitivity. Total-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides decreased significantly and HDL increased (p < 0.001). The left ventricle mass declined significantly after treatment, using Dewereux's calculation, by 17.2 %. The left ventricular diastolic function was not affected by the treatment, however, the lef aulium and left ventricle diminished in volume.

Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Enalapril; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Ischemia

The aim of our investigation was to determine whether the presence of additional risk factors or type of hypertension (diastolic or isolated systolic) influences blood pressure (BP) response to treatment. The International Nifedipine GITS Study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT) study is a double-blinded outcome comparison of calcium channel blockade with diuretics in high-risk patients aged 55 to 80 years. Dynamic randomization between nifedipine once daily and hydrochlorothiazide/amiloride was performed to ensure that approximately equal numbers of patients in the 2 groups had each of the major cardiovascular risk factors. Patients with isolated systolic hypertension were also separately randomized. Atenolol or enalapril was the mandatory second-line drug. In 5669 patients who completed the 18-week titration, BP fell from 172+/-15/99+/-9 mm Hg (mean+/-SD) while receiving placebo to 139+/-12/82+/-7 mm Hg. Twenty-six percent of patients required 2 drugs, and 4% required 3 drugs. Patients with diabetes were the most resistant to treatment, requiring second and third drugs 40% and 100% more frequently than patients without diabetes and achieving marginally the highest final BP, for any risk group, of 141+/-13/82+/-8 mm Hg. Age, smoking, gender, hypercholesterolemia, left ventricular hypertrophy, and existing atherosclerosis had little (<1 mm Hg) or no influence on BP at the end of titration, but all except smoking slightly reduced the initial response of either systolic or diastolic BP. Patients with isolated systolic hypertension were slightly more responsive than average to treatment. Our findings suggest that in patients at high absolute risk of cardiovascular complications from hypertension, the risk factors themselves do not prevent the recommended BP targets from being achieved.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antihypertensive Agents; Atenolol; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Diastole; Diuretics; Double-Blind Method; Enalapril; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Systole

Effectiveness of enalapril was studied in hypertensive patients with or without diabetes-mellitus. All the patients received enalapril, 5-20 mg per day for 9 months. Enalapril effectively controlled the blood pressure and favourably altered the lipid levels and did not affect the glucose level in diabetics as well as non-diabetics. Enalapril may be considered as a better therapeutic option for the treatment of hypertension associated with diabetes mellitus.

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Enalapril; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged

1. The effect of administration of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), lisinopril (Carace; 10-40 mg twice daily) and the calcium channel blocker, nifedipine (Adalat Retard; 20-40 mg twice daily) on ex vivo [45Ca2+] uptake by platelets from hypertensive diabetic (type 1 and 2) patients was investigated. 2. At the end of at least 3 months treatment, blood was collected prior to the patient taking the morning dose of medication and washed platelets prepared. [45Ca2+] uptake was monitored following the addition of adrenaline, isoprenaline and dibutyryl cAMP (dbcAMP), as well as in unstimulated (zero) platelets. 3. Both nifedipine and lisinopril significantly inhibited the ex vivo uptake of [45Ca2+] by platelets when this process was stimulated by adrenaline, isoprenaline and dibutyryl cAMP. Basal uptake was also inhibited in both groups. 4. These data consolidate the hypothesis that ACE inhibitors may possess calcium channel/calcium mobilisation blocking properties. Apart from its hypertensive action, lisinopril may also reduce platelet activity via modulation of calcium dynamics, thereby reducing the incidence of vascular complications associated with diabetes mellitus.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Platelets; Bucladesine; Calcium; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Enalapril; Epinephrine; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Isoproterenol; Lisinopril; Male; Middle Aged; Nifedipine

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium antagonists are effective agents for controlling high blood pressure in diabetic patients. We selected 30 type II diabetic patients with proteinuria and evaluated the effect of these drugs on renal function and proteinuria. In a double-blind trial, patients received either 40 mg/day enalapril or 40 mg/day nifedipine during 12 months. They also received a hypoproteic diet with 0.8 g/kg wt/day of protein. In the enalapril group (10 men and eight women), mean arterial blood pressure was 112.0 +/- 12 mm Hg, creatinine clearance was 58.6 +/- 12.4 ml/min, and 24-hour proteinuria was 4.36 +/- 3.23 g/24 hr before treatment. After treatment, mean arterial blood pressure was 82.0 +/- 8.30 mm Hg (p less than 0.001), creatinine clearance was 66.6 +/- 13.8 ml/min (NS), and 24-hour proteinuria was 0.56 +/- 0.78 g/24 hr (p less than 0.001). In the nifedipine group (six men and six women), mean arterial blood pressure was 114.0 +/- 8.0 mm Hg, creatinine clearance was 67.8 +/- 19.6 ml/min, and 24-hour proteinuria was 2.84 +/- 1.31 g/24 hr before treatment. After treatment, mean arterial blood pressure was 86.0 +/- 7.0 mm Hg (p less than 0.001), creatinine clearance was 51.4 +/- 7.9 ml/min (p less than 0.001), and 24-hour proteinuria was 2.66 +/- 0.89 g/24 hr (NS). These results show a similar hypotensive action and different renal effects between these two drugs after 12 months of treatment.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Creatinine; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Enalapril; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Hypotension; Kidney; Male; Nifedipine; Potassium; Proteinuria

Angiotensin II is the main regulator of both glomerular haemodynamics and glomerular capillary permeability. An alteration in the function of intrarenal angiotensin II seems to be the cause of diabetic glomerulopathy in animals and humans. In order to investigate the renal effects of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor enalapril (5 mg once a day), 24 normotensive diabetic patients with persistent proteinuria, after a 3-month run-in period, were randomly allocated to receive the active drug (12 patients) or the corresponding placebo, for the 6 months. Effective renal plasma flow, glomerular filtration rate, renal vascular resistance and filtration fraction were measured at the end of the run-in and the treatment periods. Blood pressure, heart rate, urinary albumin excretion, plasma renin activity and aldosterone, blood glucose, serum fructosamine and body weight were checked monthly during the run-in and every 2 months during the treatment period. Enalapril decreased urinary albumin excretion in the normotensive diabetic patients without any changes in systemic blood pressure or glomerular haemodynamics. These results indicate that ACE inhibition interferes with the glomerular capillary permeability induced by angiotensin II.

Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus; Enalapril; Female; Hemodynamics; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proteinuria

The effects of a long term reduction in blood pressure on the kidney function of normotensive diabetic patients who had persistent microalbuminuria (30-300 mg albumin/24 hours) were studied in two groups of 10 such patients before and during six months of treatment with either 20 mg enalapril or placebo daily. Treatments were assigned randomly in a double blind fashion. Before treatment both groups had similar clinical characteristics, weight, diet, total glycosylated haemoglobin, median albumin excretion rate (enalapril group 124 mg/24 h, placebo group 81 mg/24 h), and mean arterial pressure (enalapril group 100 (SD 8) mm Hg, placebo group 99 (6) mm Hg). During treatment weight, urinary urea excretion, and total glycosylated haemoglobin remained unchanged. The mean arterial pressure decreased in the enalapril group but not in the placebo group (enalapril group 90 (10) mm Hg, placebo group 98 (8) mm Hg). The median albumin excretion rate also fell in the enalapril group but not in the placebo group (enalapril group 37 mg/24 h, placebo group 183 mg/24 h.) The glomerular filtration rate rose in the enalapril group from 130 (23) ml/min/1.73 m2 to 141 (24) ml/min/1.73 m2, and total renal resistances and fractional albumin clearance decreased while fractional albumin clearance increased in the placebo group. These results show that in patients who have diabetes but not hypertension a reduction in blood pressure by inhibition of converting enzyme for six months can reduce persistent microalbuminuria, perhaps by decreasing the intraglomerular pressure.

Topics: Adult; Albumins; Albuminuria; Blood Pressure; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus; Double-Blind Method; Enalapril; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Kidney; Male; Middle Aged; Random Allocation

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a prominent health care issue worldwide. One of the most prevalent comorbidities of DM is cardiovascular disease (CVD). The objective of this study was to assess the utilization patterns of cardiovascular medications in patients with DM in Iran from 2013 to 2017.. This retrospective cross-sectional study was undertaken using prescription claims data from 2013 to 2017 in Iran. Epidemiological data elements used in this study were obtained from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2019 study. In addition, data on total medication sales were obtained from the national regulatory authority database. The data on medication utilization were analyzed according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification (ATC) /Defined Daily Doses (DDD) international system.. Based on the findings, Acetylsalicylic acid was the mainstay of treatment with a utilization rate of 191.7 DDD/ patient/ year in 2017, followed by Atorvastatin with 170.0 and Losartan with 115.1. Although there was an increasing trend in the utilization rate of the medications, the rate of Atenolol and Enalapril was constantly declining during the 2013-17 period. On the other hand, Valsartan and Metoprolol were attracting attention. Almost all medication utilization rates increased from the 30-39 age group up to the 80 + age group. Females had a higher utilization rate in each age group during the whole study period.. The present study reflects that medication utilization patterns were rational, according to the standard treatment guidelines. Utilization patterns of medications that are recommended for both prevention and treatment of CVD in diabetes were observed to be the highest. Implementation of further policies is needed to minimize cardiovascular complications of diabetes.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetes Mellitus; Enalapril; Female; Humans; Retrospective Studies

Compared with enalapril, sacubitril/valsartan lowered HbA1c and reduced new insulin therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and diabetes in the PARADIGM-HF trial. We sought to assess the glycemic effects of sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and diabetes, and across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in heart failure and diabetes.. We compared the effect of sacubitril/valsartan, relative to valsartan, on HbA1c, new insulin therapy and hypoglycemia in the randomized controlled trial PARAGON-HF, and performed pooled analyses of PARAGON-HF and PARADIGM-HF.. Sacubitril/valsartan reduced HbA1c and new insulin therapy in patients with heart failure and diabetes across the spectrum of LVEF but may be associated with a slightly higher risk for hypoglycemia. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01920711.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus; Enalapril; Glycated Hemoglobin; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulins; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

To reduce the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiovascular risk, the guidelines recommend the blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) in patients with proteinuria.. To assess the frequency of enalapril or losartan use in diabetics or hypertensive patients with stage 3 CKD.. Review of clinical records of patients with CKD in an urban primary care clinic.. We identified 408 subjects aged 40 to 98 years (66% women) with stage 3 CKD. Sixty six percent had only hypertension and 34% were diabetic with or without hypertension. Seventy four percent received RAAS blockers (52% used enalapril, 45% losartan and 2% both medications). RAAS blockers were used in 70% of hypertensive and 78% of diabetic patients. The prescription in hypertensive diabetics with microalbuminuria was lower than in those without microalbuminuria (72% vs 87%, p < 0.05), but the opposite occurred in pure hypertensive patients with and without microalbuminuria (88% vs 69%, p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in blood pressure levels, microalbuminuria or serum potassium levels between RAAS blocker users and non-users. No differences were observed either between enalapril and losartan users.. The adherence to clinical guidelines is insufficient and users of the recommended drugs did not achieve the expected goals.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Albuminuria; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Creatinine; Diabetes Mellitus; Disease Progression; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enalapril; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Losartan; Male; Middle Aged; Proteinuria; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Renin-Angiotensin System; Treatment Adherence and Compliance

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Combinations; Enalapril; Heart Failure; Humans; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Background There is very little evidence relating to the association of herbal medicine with diarrhea and the development of acute kidney injury (AKI). This study reports a case of diarrhea-induced AKI, possibly related to an individual ingesting copious amounts of homemade mixed fruit and herb puree. Case presentation A 45-year-old Thai man with diabetes had diarrhea for 2 days, as a result of taking high amounts of a puree made up of eight mixed fruits and herbs over a 3-day period. He developed dehydration and stage 2 AKI, with a doubling of his serum creatinine. He had been receiving enalapril, as a prescribed medication, over one year. After he stopped taking both the puree and enalapril, and received fluid replacement therapy, within a week his serum creatinine had gradually decreased. The combination of puree, enalapril and AKI may also have induced hyperkalemia in this patient. Furthermore, the patient developed hyperphosphatemia due to his worsening kidney function, exacerbated by regularly taking some dietary supplements containing high levels of phosphate. His serum levels of potassium and phosphate returned to normal within a week, once the patient stopped both the puree and all dietary supplements, and had begun receiving treatment for hyperkalemia. Results The mixed fruit and herb puree taken by this man may have led to his diarrhea due to its effect; particularly if the patient was taking a high concentration of such a drink. Both the puree and enalapril are likely to attenuate the progression of kidney function. The causal relationship between the puree and AKI was probable (5 scores) assessed by the modified Naranjo algorithm. This is the first case report, as far as the authors are aware, relating the drinking of a mixed fruit and herbal puree to diarrhea and AKI in a patient with diabetes. Conclusions This case can alert health care providers to the possibility that herbal medicine could induce diarrhea and develop acute kidney injury.

Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetic Nephropathies; Diarrhea; Dietary Supplements; Enalapril; Fruit; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Phytotherapy; Plant Preparations

To investigate whether treatment initiated with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) or an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) for patients with ischemic heart disease, hypertension, or diabetes causes a reduction in hemoglobin (Hb) levels.. This was a retrospective cohort analysis using the computerized database of a large health maintenance organization. Included were all adults with a first purchase of an ACE-I, an ARB, or a calcium channel blocker (CCB) between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2009, defined as the index date. Measures of Hb levels before and 1 year after the index date were reviewed, and the change was calculated. All the analyses were stratified by pharmaceutical class. The main exposure variables were the proportion of days covered (PDC) by these drugs and the mean enalapril dosage (for enalapril users only).. Levels of Hb before and after treatment were available for 14,754 patients taking ACE-Is, 751 taking ARBs, and 3087 taking CCBs. A high PDC was significantly associated with greater yearly reductions in Hb levels compared with a low PDC for CCB use, but was more pronounced for ACE-I and ARB use. A high PDC was also associated with a higher odds of developing anemia in ACE-I users (odds ratio [OR], 1.59; P<.001) and ARB users (OR, 2.21; P=.05). In nonanemic enalapril users, every 10-mg increment in daily dose was associated with an OR of 1.45 for the development of anemia (P<.001). The association remained after excluding nonadherent patients.. Levels of Hb are reduced during the first year of use of ACE-Is and to a lesser extent with use of ARBs. This association is dose dependent and is not explained by patient adherence.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Calcium Channel Blockers; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Enalapril; Female; Hemoglobins; Humans; Hypertension; Logistic Models; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Myocardial Ischemia; Retrospective Studies

Renoprotective effect of ACE-inhibitors has been questioned in case of decreased effective circulating volume, like in right or biventricular chronic heart failure.. To detect clinical predictors of renal worsening in CHF patient population characterized by two types of ACE-inhibitor dosing regimens.. According to a retrospective cohort design, we followed 2 groups of patients with CHF - whether right or biventricular -, all in III NYHA class treated with ACE-inhibitors (enalapril or lisinopril), and with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50%, by distinguishing them by ACE-inhibitor dosing: average-low (<10 mg per day) or "high" dose (>10 mg per day) of enalapril or lisinopril. Worsened renal failure (ARD) was defined by Cr increase >30% from baseline. Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify the predictors of ARD among the following variables: ACE-inhibitors "high" dose, age, basal LVEF, history of repeated intensive intravenous loop diuretic therapies (IV diur), diabetes, basal Cr, history of hypertension, systolic blood pressure < 100 mm Hg.. 57 patients were recruited, of whom 15 were treated with ACE-inhibitor "high" dose. During a mean follow-up of 718 days, ARD occurred in 17 (29.8%) patients. Only ACE-inhibitor "high" dose (HR: 12.4681 C.I.: 2.1614-71.9239 p=0.0050) and basal Cr (HR: 1.2344 C.I.: 1.0414-1.4632 p=0.0157) were shown to predict ARD. Moreover, ACE-inhibitor "high" doses were shown to fail to predict ARD in both CHF without IV diur and CHF with diabetes.. In III NYHA class CHF, ACE-inhibitor "high" doses and a higher basal Cr predicted ARD. Nephrotoxicity related to ACE-inhibitor "high" doses was increased by IV diur, whereas it was not detected in CHF patients with diabetes.

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Chronic Disease; Creatinine; Diabetes Mellitus; Diuretics; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enalapril; Epidemiologic Methods; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Lisinopril; Male; Reference Values; Renal Insufficiency; Risk Factors

Lung cancer involvement of the heart is not unusual, but in most cases is silent. Arrhythmia and electrocardiographic findings suggesting an acute myocardial infarction could be the first manifestation of myocardial infiltration by the tumour. Echocardiography could be a valuable tool to define the diagnosis in patients with lung cancer and newly diagnosed arrhythmia or ST-T wave alterations. When echocardiographics findings are not conclusive, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows differentiation between tumour and myocardium.

Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Atrial Flutter; Carboplatin; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Combined Modality Therapy; Diabetes Mellitus; Docetaxel; Echocardiography; Electrocardiography; Enalapril; Fatal Outcome; Glyburide; Heart Neoplasms; Humans; Hypertension; Hypoglycemic Agents; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Radiotherapy; Taxoids; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

A prospective study was conducted at Manipal Teaching Hospital, Pokhara, Nepal to identify and analyze the pattern of the potential DDIs (drug-drug interaction) in diabetes patients. A total of 182 patients who were prescribed 685 drugs (average, 3.76 drugs per prescription) were enrolled. Patients 51 to 60 years of age had a higher risk [43 patients, or (23.6%)] of developing DDIs. It was found that 174 (92.1%) of the potential DDIs were of "moderate" severity. Cardiovascular drugs carried a risk of DDIs (187 drugs, or 49.5%). The most common potential DDI observed was between metformin and enalapril (n = 64).

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Child; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Interactions; Enalapril; Female; Hospitals, Teaching; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Nepal; Outpatients; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors

Diabetes mellitus is a predictor of morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure. The effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors on the prevention of diabetes in patients with left ventricular dysfunction is unknown. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the effect of the ACE inhibitor enalapril on the incidence of diabetes in the group of patients from the Montreal Heart Institute enrolled in the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD).. Clinical charts were evaluated for fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels by blinded reviewers. A diagnosis of diabetes was made when a FPG > or =126 mg/dL (7 mmol/L) was found at 2 visits (follow-up, 2.9+/-1.0 years). Of the 391 patients enrolled at the Montreal Heart Institute, 291 were not diabetic (FPG <126 mg/dL without a history of diabetes), 153 of these were on enalapril and 138 were on placebo. Baseline characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. Forty patients developed diabetes during follow-up, 9 (5.9%) in the enalapril group and 31 (22.4%) in the placebo group (P<0.0001). By multivariate analysis, enalapril remained the most powerful predictor for risk reduction of developing diabetes (hazard ratio, 0.22; 95% confidence intervals, 0.10 to 0.46; P<0.0001). The effect of enalapril was striking in the subgroup of patients with impaired FPG (110 mg/dL [6.1 mmol/L] < or =FPG <126 mg/dL) at baseline: 1 patient (3.3%) in the enalapril group versus 12 (48.0%) in the placebo group developed diabetes (P<0.0001).. Enalapril significantly reduces the incidence of diabetes in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, especially those with impaired FPG.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Glucose; Chronic Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Enalapril; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

We have reported that the induction of diabetes in N(omega)-nitro-L-orginine methyl ester (L-NAME)-infused rats causes significant hypertension that is associated with increased plasma renin activity. This study tested the role of angiotensin II (Ang II) by clamping it chronically at baseline levels. The clamp consisted of an intravenous infusion of enalapril (10 mg/kg/d), which decreased mean arterial pressure (MAP) by approximately 20 mm Hg after 3 days, and adding chronic Ang II at 4 ng/kg/min, which restored MAP to normal. Chronic L-NAME infusion increased MAP to 127 +/- 1 and 132 +/- 2 mm Hg in normal and clamped rats, respectively, and induction of diabetes (streptozotocin) increased MAP progressively in normal rats to 161 +/- 8 mm Hg by day 12, whereas MAP in the clamped rats decreased progressively to 98 +/- 5 mm Hg by day 12. In non-L-NAME rats, MAP averaged 95 +/- 1 and 91 +/- 1 mm Hg for normal and clamped groups, respectively, before diabetes, and MAP was 10 to 13 mm Hg lower in the clamped versus normal rats midway through the diabetic period. This suggests that Ang II is important for maintaining blood pressure at the onset of diabetes, possibly to compensate for renal volume losses. Angiotensin II also is required for the hypertension caused by induction of diabetes in rats with chronic blockade of nitric oxide synthesis, but whether this is due to increased volume sensitivity in L-NAME-treated, vasoconstricted rats remains to be determined.

Topics: Angiotensin II; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Enalapril; Hypertension; Male; Models, Animal; NG-Nitroarginine Methyl Ester; Nitric Oxide; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Vasoconstrictor Agents

The interaction between angiotensin-(1-7) (Ang-(1-7)) and bradykinin (BK) was determined in the mesentery of anesthetized Wistar alloxan-diabetic and non-diabetic rats using intravital microscopy. Impaired BK vasodilation observed in arterioles of diabetic rats was restored by acute and chronic insulin treatment as well as by enalapril. Though capable of potentiating BK in non-diabetic rats, Ang-(1-7) did not potentiate BK in diabetic rats. Chronic but not acute insulin treatment restored the potentiation, whereas enalapril did not. Potassium channel blockade (by tetraethylammonium (TEA)) but not nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibition (by N-omega-nitro-L-arginine-methyl-esther (L-NAME)) abolished the restorative effect of insulin. Our data allow us to suggest that the alteration observed is restored by insulin by a mechanism involving membrane hyperpolarization but not NO release. The beneficial effect of enalapril in diabetes might not involve the potentiation of BK by Ang-(1-7).

Topics: Angiotensin I; Animals; Blood Glucose; Bradykinin; Diabetes Mellitus; Enalapril; Insulin; Male; Mesenteric Arteries; Peptide Fragments; Rats; Rats, Wistar

Antihypertensive drugs are commonly prescribed for the treatment of patients with both diabetes and hypertension. However, the role of selected agents in the development of hypoglycemia remains controversial. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of antihypertensive agents on the risk of hypoglycemia in diabetic patients receiving insulin or sulfonylurea therapy. A matched case-control study was conducted using Pennsylvania Medicaid data. Five control subjects, matched for sex and age, with no reported medical condition of hypoglycemia, were randomly selected for each case patient admitted for hypoglycemia in 1993, resulting in a total of 404 cases and 1375 controls. With these sample sizes, we were able to detect a difference of 10% (P < 0.05) for our primary outcome measure, hospitalization for hypoglycemia. The relative risk of hypoglycemia was estimated using an unconditional logistic regression. The risk of hypoglycemia was 5.5 times greater (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0 to 7.6) in insulin versus sulfonylurea users and was not influenced by use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors overall. However, use of the ACE inhibitor enalapril was associated with an increased risk of hypoglycemia (odds ratio, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.1 to 5.3) in sulfonylurea users, suggesting that analyzing the unintended side effects of a class of drugs can sometimes mask the adverse effects of individual drugs. Use of beta-blockers was not associated with an increased risk of hypoglycemia, providing further empiric evidence that beta-blockers are an appropriate treatment for persons with concomitant diabetes and hypertension. Per capita health care costs were approximately 3 times higher in patients hospitalized for hypoglycemia compared with controls (P < 0.05). Hospitalization for hypoglycemia is expensive and may be prevented with appropriate monitoring of diabetic patients taking selected antihypertensive agents such as enalapril.

Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Adult; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Data Collection; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Interactions; Enalapril; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Monitoring, Physiologic; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome

Diabetes is an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure, patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction (defined as an ejection fraction of 35% or less), and in a broader registry population with less stringent entry criteria. Although the SOLVD Trials made a major clinical contribution by proving the value of enalapril, diabetes remains a significant predictor of outcome even after adjusting for treatment with enalapril.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Enalapril; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Odds Ratio; Prognosis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Registries; Regression Analysis; Risk Factors; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

1. The present study was undertaken to examine the effect of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, enalapril, on blood pressure and spontaneous blood glucose levels in two rat models: our new diabetic hypertensive rat in which genetic hypertension and diabetes develop following cross-breeding of Cohen diabetic rat (CDR) and spontaneous hypertensive rats (SHR); and a rat in which hypertension, hyperinsulinaemia and hyperlipidaemia were induced by fructose diet. 2. The new strain of animal was fed the usual copper-poor sucrose diet, and for 4 weeks received enalapril. The fructose-induced hyperinsulinaemic animals were fed a fructose-enriched diet for 3 weeks, and enalapril 20 mg per kg per day was added to the drinking water for 2 more weeks. 3. The new strain of diabetic-hypertensive rats that received enalapril showed a significant decrease in blood pressure level. The fructose-fed animals showed a fall in insulin and blood pressure following the introduction of enalapril to their diet. 4. The present study confirms the advantage of the ACE inhibitor enalapril in improving the metabolic parameters of hypertensive diabetic rats, including insulin sensitivity.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Blood Pressure; Copper; Diabetes Mellitus; Diet; Enalapril; Female; Fructose; Hyperinsulinism; Hyperlipidemias; Hypertension; Male; Rats; Rats, Inbred SHR; Rats, Sprague-Dawley

Disturbances of neurovascular function in the extremities may occur in patients with diabetes mellitus, exposure to toxic substances and chronic exposure to vibrating hand tools, as well as in Raynaud's phenomena. In these conditions symptoms of paraesthesia, finger numbness and blanching occur, so nerve conduction studies, vibration and temperature threshold measurements and neurovascular function tests are used for objective assessment of neurological dysfunction. The aim of the present study was to examine some factors which may confound quantitative neuro-vascular function measurements if used to assess neuropathy in diabetics. All subjects were consenting volunteers without exposure to known neurotoxic chemicals. The 5 groups were (a) healthy non-diabetic subjects not exposed to vibration (n = 10, mean age 52.3 yrs) (b) 2 insulin dependent and 8 non-insulin dependent diabetic subjects with a mean of 6 years treatment (n = 10, mean age 55.7 yrs) (c) maintenance employees exposed to high frequency pneumatic hand tools (n = 10, mean age 52.2 yrs) (d) subjects who were not diabetic or exposed to vibrating tools, but were being treated with the ACE-inhibitor enalapril 20 mg daily for hypertension (n = 5, mean age 54 yrs) (e) subjects who had smoked more than 10 cigarettes daily for at least 15 yrs (n = 10, mean age 51 yrs). Neurovascular tests included axon reflex responses measured by laser Doppler velocimeter evoked on the dorsum of the finger by iontophoresis of acetylcholine 16 mC in a circumferential chamber: cutaneous microvascular dilator responses to endothelial stimulation by iontophoretic application of the muscarinic agonist pilocarpine 16 mC and to direct nitrodilator sodium nitroprusside 16 mC. The skin temperature of the digits was held between 33 degrees and 34 degrees C during testing and dilator responses were measured as flux change by on-line computer analysis using 'Perisoft'. There was a significant reduction (P < 0.05) in the neurovascular responses of both diabetics and vibration--exposed subjects to acetylcholine and, in the case of vibration-exposed subjects, to pilocarpine, but nitroprusside responses were not significantly different. Our findings of reductions in neurovascular responses in diabetics and in subjects exposed to higher frequency vibration is consistent with recent epidemiological findings. Furthermore, subjects treated with an ACE-inhibitor (enalapril) showed significant reduction in acetylcholine-evoked axon refle

Topics: Acetylcholine; Axons; Blood Vessels; Diabetes Mellitus; Enalapril; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Nervous System; Pilocarpine; Reference Values; Reflex; Smoking; Vasodilation; Vibration

Topics: Blood Glucose; Captopril; Diabetes Mellitus; Enalapril; Humans; Hypertension

The treatment of arterial hypertension in diabetic patients still raises numerous problems. In this type of patients, the most commonly prescribed drugs (beta-blockers, diuretics, antihypertensive agents acting on the central nervous system) have troublesome and potentially detrimental effects (e.g. effects on lipids). The new categories of antihypertensive drugs recently introduced (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium antagonists) are likely to be most useful in these patients. In an open trial in non-insulin-dependent diabetics with arterial hypertension followed-up for 1 year, enalapril administered alone has proved effective and devoid of clinical and biochemical side-effects. If these results are confirmed, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors will rank high as first-choice treatment of arterial hypertension in diabetics.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Calcium Channel Blockers; Captopril; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Diuretics; Enalapril; Humans; Hypertension; Obesity; Vasodilator Agents