enalapril and Cicatrix

enalapril has been researched along with Cicatrix* in 3 studies

Other Studies

3 other study(ies) available for enalapril and Cicatrix

ArticleYear
Cell transplantation to prevent heart failure: a comparison of cell types.
    The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2003, Volume: 76, Issue:6

    Autologous cell transplantation may restore viable muscle after a myocardial infarction. We compared the effect of three cell types or an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor on preservation of ventricular function after cardiac injury.. A uniform transmural myocardial scar was created in adult rats by cryoinjury. Three weeks later the rats were randomly assigned to one of four blinded treatments: transplantation with 5 x 10(6) aortic smooth muscle cells (SMC, n = 12), ventricular heart cells (VHC, n = 13), skeletal muscle cells (SKC, n = 13) or culture medium alone (control, n = 11). The ACE inhibitor group (n = 8) received enalapril (1.0 mg/kg per day), also beginning 3 weeks after cryoinjury. Five and 12 weeks after transplantation, left ventricle (LV) function was assessed in a Langendorff apparatus, and histologic and immunohistological evaluation of the LV scars was performed.. At 5 weeks, greater scar elastin content and better LV function was noted with cell transplantation or ACE inhibitor therapy compared with control rats (p < 0.05). Twelve weeks after transplantation, cell-transplanted rats still had greater elastin content and better LV function than control rats, although elastin content and LV function had declined in ACE inhibitor-treated animals to levels below those observed in control rats (p < 0.05).. Transplantation of SMC, VHC, and SKC preserved ventricular function equivalent to the effects of an ACE inhibitor. Muscle cell transplantation, but not ACE inhibitor therapy, continues to be effective later after cryoinjury. No differences were detected between the muscle cells.

    Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Aorta; Cardiac Output, Low; Cell Transplantation; Cells, Cultured; Cicatrix; Cryopreservation; Elastin; Enalapril; Heart Injuries; Heart Ventricles; Immunohistochemistry; Muscle, Skeletal; Muscle, Smooth, Vascular; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardium; Rats; Rats, Inbred Lew; Ventricular Function, Left

2003
Partial prevention of changes in SR gene expression in congestive heart failure due to myocardial infarction by enalapril or losartan.
    Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 2003, Volume: 254, Issue:1-2

    Although activation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is known to produce ventricular remodeling and congestive heart failure (CHF), its role in inducing changes in the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) protein and gene expression in CHF is not fully understood. In this study, CHF was induced in rats by ligation of the left coronary artery for 3 weeks and then the animals were treated orally with or without an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, enalapril (10 mg/kg/day) or an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, losartan (20 mg/kg/day) for 4 weeks. Sham-operated animals were used as control. The animals were hemodynamically assessed and protein content as well as gene expression of SR Ca(2+)-release channel (ryanodine receptor, RYR), Ca(2+)-pump ATPase (SERCA2), phospholamban (PLB) and calsequestrin (CQS) were determined in the left ventricle (LV). The infarcted animals showed cardiac hypertrophy, lung congestion, depression in LV +dP/dt and -dP/dt, as well as increase in LV end diastolic pressure. Both protein content and mRNA levels for RYR, SERCA2 and PLB were decreased without any changes in CQS in the failing heart. These alterations in LV function as well as SR protein and gene expression in CHF were partially prevented by treatment with enalapril or losartan. The results suggest that partial improvement in LV function by enalapril and losartan treatments may be due to partial prevention of changes in SR protein and gene expression in CHF and that these effects may be due to blockade of the RAS.

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Blotting, Northern; Blotting, Western; Calcium; Calcium-Binding Proteins; Calcium-Transporting ATPases; Calsequestrin; Cicatrix; Enalapril; Gene Expression Regulation; Heart Failure; Heart Ventricles; Losartan; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; RNA; RNA, Messenger; Sarcoplasmic Reticulum; Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Calcium-Transporting ATPases; Time Factors

2003
Beneficial effects of therapy on the progression of structural remodeling during healing after reperfused and nonreperfused myocardial infarction: different effects on different parameters.
    Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics, 2002, Volume: 7, Issue:2

    Structural left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction is a complex process with several pathophysiologic descriptors that can be modified by pharmacotherapy. However, the possibility that different classes of antiremodeling agents might exert different effects on different remodeling parameters after reperfused and nonreperfused myocardial infarction has not been systematically studied.. We measured detailed left ventricular remodeling parameters in vivo (echocardiograms) repeatedly over 6 weeks and ex vivo (planimetry) at 6 weeks after myocardial infarction in 36 dogs randomized (factorial design) after reperfused or nonreperfused myocardial infarction to 6 weeks of twice daily oral therapy with the calcium channel blocker amlodipine (5 mg), the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril (5 mg) or placebo, and 18 matching sham or control animals. Compared to placebo and control groups over 6 weeks, both agents reduced left ventricular loading and limited overall remodeling in both reperfused and nonreperfused groups, but there were pertinent differences. Enalapril limited the increase in left ventricular asynergy in the reperfused group. Both enalapril and amlodipine limited infarct zone thinning in the nonreperfused groups but increased infarct zone thinning in the reperfused groups, despite preserved infarct zone collagen with amlodipine. Enalapril decreased left ventricular diastolic volume and mass more than amlodipine in the reperfused group and increased left ventricular ejection fraction in the nonreperfused group. Both agents limited regional and global shape deformation in reperfused and non-reperfused groups. Diastolic wall stress in the infarct zone decreased with amlodipine, and increased with enalapril and reperfusion.. Different antiremodeling therapies may exert different effects on different remodeling parameters during healing after reperfused myocardial infarction. Significant interactions occur during reperfusion. More than one variable may be needed for the comprehensive assessment of the antiremodeling efficacy of different therapies.

    Topics: Amlodipine; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Calcium Channel Blockers; Cardiac Volume; Cicatrix; Collagen; Disease Models, Animal; Dogs; Enalapril; Heart; Hemodynamics; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Reperfusion; Myocardium; Organ Size; Time Factors; Ventricular Remodeling; Wound Healing

2002