enalapril and Acute-Coronary-Syndrome

This study investigated the effects of irbesartan vs. enalapril, with early vs. late treatment, on markers of inflammation and ischaemic heart disease in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS).. Patients hospitalized with ischaemic symptoms and evidence of NSTEACS were randomized to early (at hospitalization) or late (at hospital discharge) treatment with irbesartan 150 mg/day followed by 300 mg/day on day 15 (n = 212) or enalapril 10 mg/day followed by 20 mg/day on day 15 (n = 217) to day 60. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-C-reactive protein) at day 60; secondary endpoints included changes in troponin I, B-type natriuretic peptide, microalbuminuria, interleukin 6, myeloperoxidase, secretory non-pancreatic type II phospholipase A2, ischaemia-modified albumin, soluble CD40 ligand, matrix metalloproteinase-9, aldosterone, and blood pressure. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels were comparable in both the irbesartan and enalapril treatment arms. There were no treatment-related differences in any of the biomarkers measured. Changes in inflammatory markers were unaffected by the timing of treatment initiation. Both treatments were well tolerated, with no differences in major adverse cardiac events.. In patients with NSTEACS, inflammatory markers decreased over time in both treatment arms, with no differences between irbesartan and enalapril.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; C-Reactive Protein; Double-Blind Method; Enalapril; Female; Humans; Irbesartan; Male; Middle Aged; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome

The main objective was to compare the meaning of soluble angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (sACE2) plasma levels modulation on the prognosis of two cohorts of heart failure (HF) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We conducted an observational clinical study where sACE2 was measured in two cohorts of HF or ACS (102 patients each), matched by age and gender. The primary endpoint (cardiac death) and the secondary endpoints (non-fatal myocardial infarction or HF readmission) were registered during a 5-year follow-up period. Association with pharmacotherapy was studied, and the effects of cardiovascular drugs on ACE isoforms expression were analysed in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) in vitro. The levels of sACE2 were significantly higher in the HF than ACS cohort. sACE2 was inversely related with the leukocytes number and directly with urea levels. In the ACS cohort, sACE2 was associated with age and glycaemic parameters, but in the HF cohort, the association was with N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide. The levels of sACE2 were related to long-term prognosis and confirmed as a non-independent predictor in the HF cohort. Soluble ACE2 was higher in patients treated with angiotensin receptors blockers and β-blockers, accordingly with losartan and metoprolol upregulation of ACE1 and ACE2 in HUVECs. Plasma levels of sACE2 were higher in HF than in ACS, independently of age and gender, and were related to long-term cardiac death in the HF cohort. Losartan and metoprolol, but not enalapril, upregulated ACE expression in endothelial cells, accordingly with higher levels of sACE2 in patients using these drugs.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; ADAM17 Protein; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2; Enalapril; Female; Heart Failure; Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Losartan; Male; Metoprolol; Middle Aged; Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A; Prognosis