edoxaban and Venous-Thromboembolism

To systematically review the efficacy of 11 anticoagulants in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after total hip or knee arthroplasty.. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, VIP, and China Biology Medicine databases were electronically searched for studies assessing the efficacy of different anticoagulants for the prevention of VTE after total hip or knee arthroplasty from January 1, 2010, to January 27, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and graded the evidence using Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis. The network meta-analysis was then performed using Stata 16.0 software and R 4.1.0 software.. A total of 61 articles were included. The results of network meta-analysis showed that apixaban, edoxaban, fondaparinux, rivaroxaban, and darexaban were the most effective anticoagulants for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty (P < .05), while there was no difference in the efficacy among the anticoagulants for the prevention of pulmonary embolism (P > .05).. Apixaban, edoxaban, fondaparinux, rivaroxaban, and darexaban have the best efficacy for the prevention of VTE after total hip or knee arthroplasty.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Fondaparinux; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been used for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Thailand. However, they have not been listed in the National List of Essential Medicines (NLEM). A cost-effectiveness analysis is needed to aid policymakers in deciding whether DOACs should be listed in the NLEM. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of DOACs for patients with VTE in Thailand.. A cohort-based state transition model was constructed from a societal perspective with a lifetime horizon. All available DOACs, including apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran, were compared with warfarin. A 6-month cycle length was used to capture all costs and health outcomes. The model consisted of nine health states, including VTE on treatment, VTE off treatment, recurrent VTE, clinically relevant non-major bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial bleeding, post-intracranial bleeding, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, and death. All inputs were based on a comprehensive literature review. The model outcomes included total cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) with a 3% annual discount rate. A fully incremental cost-effectiveness analysis and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per QALY gained were calculated at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) of THB 160,000/QALY ($5003). The robustness of the findings was assessed using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.. All DOACs were associated with a decreased risk of VTE recurrence and intracranial hemorrhage. In the base-case analysis, apixaban could increase 0.16 QALYs compared with warfarin. An ICER for apixaban was 269,809 Thai baht (THB)/QALY ($8437/QALY). Rivaroxaban had a better QALY than warfarin at 0.09 QALYs with an ICER of 757,363 THB/QALY ($23,682/QALY). Edoxaban and dabigatran could also increase by 0.10 QALYs with an ICER of 709,945 THB ($22,200) and 707,145 THB ($22,122)/QALY, respectively. Our probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicated that warfarin had a 99.8% possibility of being cost-effective, while apixaban had a 0.2% possibility of being cost-effective at the current WTP. Other DOACs had no possibility of being cost-effective.. All DOACs were not cost-effective for VTE treatment at the current WTP in Thailand. Apixaban is likely to be the best option among DOACs.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Rivaroxaban; Thailand; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly being used for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT). However, there is limited evidence of the efficacy of DOACs for the treatment of gynecological CAT. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of edoxaban for the treatment of gynecological CAT using Japanese real-world data.. We reviewed the medical records of patients with 371 gynecological cancer who received edoxaban or vitamin K antagonist (VKA) between January 2011 and December 2018.. Altogether, 211 and 160 patients were treated with edoxaban and VKA, respectively. Fourteen patients (6.8%) in the edoxaban group and 22 (13.8%) in the VKA group showed recurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Cumulative VTE recurrence was not significantly different between the 2 groups (p=0.340). Adverse events occurred in 15 (7.1%) and 11 (6.9%) patients in the edoxaban and VKA groups, respectively (p=0.697). Subgroup analysis of the edoxaban and VKA groups according to different tumor types, including ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer, showed equivalent outcomes in terms of VTE recurrence and adverse events. Patients without pulmonary embolism (PE) were mostly omitted from initial unfractionated heparin (UFH) therapy prior to administration of edoxaban. However, this did not increase the recurrence of VTE.. This study confirmed that edoxaban is effective and safe for the treatment of gynecological CAT. This finding was consistent for different types of gynecological cancer. Additionally, initial UFH therapy prior to the administration of edoxaban may be unnecessary for patients without PE.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Heparin; Humans; Japan; Neoplasms; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Previous preliminary clinical trials have confirmed that edoxaban can be efficacious for venous thromboembolism (VTE). This meta-analysis was considered to evaluate edoxaban's short-term efficacy and safety for venous thromboembolism after arthroplasty.. A comprehensive search was performed in these databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and EMBASE on March 2022. All eligible trials should be randomized controlled trials (RCTs) when evaluating short-term efficacy and safety outcomes of edoxaban for VTE after total hip or knee arthroplasty.. Nine RCTs with 4274 patients were involved in this meta-analysis. Edoxaban in the VTE group prevented the incidence of VTE and indicated valuable clinical efficacy. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the edoxaban group was decreased than that in other groups. Edoxaban increased the incidence of all bleeding events. However, in the edoxaban group and other groups, there was no statistical difference between major bleeding events and clinically relevant non-major or minor bleeding events. Edoxaban subgroups included edoxaban 15 mg, edoxaban 30 mg and edoxaban 60 mg prevented the incidence of VTE. Edoxaban 30 mg and 60 mg group increased the risk of all bleeding events. Edoxaban 30 mg can increase the incidence of major bleeding events. There was no difference in clinically relevant non-major or minor bleeding events. Edoxaban 30 mg can decrease the incidence of AEs.. Edoxaban was an efficacious and safe option to prevent and treat VTE in patients undergoing arthroplasty. However, we need further trials to explore edoxaban's long-term efficacy and safety.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Cancer is a major risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE), and cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) constitutes approximately 15-25% of all VTE cases. For decades, the standard treatment for CAT used to be daily subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Data on the safety and efficacy of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in this population emerged only in recent years and specific DOACs were included into recent guidelines recommendations. In this narrative review of the literature, we reported the results of the phase III randomized controlled trials that evaluated the DOACs for the prevention and the acute treatment of CAT. For the acute phase treatment, the anti-Xa inhibitors (apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban) showed better efficacy than LMWH in preventing VTE recurrence; however, rivaroxaban and edoxaban were also associated with an increased risk of bleeding events. For primary prevention of CAT in ambulatory cancer patients starting chemotherapy, apixaban and rivaroxaban showed better efficacy than placebo but a trend towards higher bleeding rates. Recent guidelines suggest the DOACs for the treatment of CAT in selected cancer patients (eg, low bleeding risk, no luminal gastrointestinal or genitourinary malignancies, no interfering medications). The DOACs are also suggested for primary thromboprophylaxis in selected ambulatory cancer patients at high risk of VTE (eg, Khorana score ≥2 prior to starting new chemotherapy, low bleeding risk, no interfering medications).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism

The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban, for preventing and treating venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer is unclear.. We searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from the establishment to November 30, 2021. In the frequency-based network meta-analysis, the odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval was reported. The relative ranking probability of each group was generated based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).. We included 15 randomized controlled trials involving a total of 6162 patients. Apixaban reduced the risk of VTE compared with low-molecular heparin [OR = 0.53, 95% CI (0.32, 0.89)]. The efficacy of drugs was ranked from highest to lowest as follows: apixaban (SUCRA, 81.0), rivaroxaban (73.0), edoxaban (65.9), dabigatran (51.4), warfarin (30.8), and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) (27.4). Edoxaban increased the risk of major bleeding compared with LMWH [OR = 1.83, 95% CI (1.04, 3.22)]. The safety of drugs was ranked from highest to lowest as follows: major bleeding-apixaban (SUCRA, 68.5), LMWH (55.1), rivaroxaban (53.0), warfarin (35.9), dabigatran (29.2), edoxaban (16.5) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding-LMWH (73.0), apixaban (57.8), edoxaban (45.8), rivaroxaban (35.3), and warfarin (10.8).. For preventing and treating VTE, in terms of VTE occurrence and major bleeding, apixaban had the lowest risk; in terms of clinically relevant non-major bleeding, LMWH had the lowest risk, followed by apixaban. Generally, apixaban is the most efficient and safest DOAC and presents better efficacy and relatively low bleeding risk among the VTE prevention and treatment drugs for patients with cancer.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Network Meta-Analysis; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Moreover, management of VTE is frequently connected with complications, namely risk of recurrent VTE and bleeding. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) therapy administrated for 3-6 months is currently considered a standard for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE (CA-VTE). Direct oral factor Xa inhibitors (FXaI) apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban have emerged as a new possibility for long-term antithrombotic therapy for VTE. These agents expose several advantages in individuals with cancer, and might overcome several disadvantages connected with LMWH therapy.. First clinical studies with oral FXaI for the treatment of CA-VTE with very promising results were recently published. The article summarizes current data regarding the use of oral FXaI in the treatment of CA-VTE.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism

Anticoagulants are essential in the prevention of venous thromboembolism. However, the effectiveness and safety of different anticoagulants have always been controversial. Therefore, we aimed to expand the sample of anticoagulant results and rank the efficacy and safety of 19 anticoagulants in the prevention of venous thromboembolism when total knee or total hip arthroplasty procedure is performed.. A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials of adult patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty were conducted. The trials were identified from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases, in which anticoagulants were used as interventions randomized controlled trial. The incidence of venous embolism and bleeding are the key outcomes of assessing the efficacy of intervention drugs. We used the Physical Therapy Evidence Database (PEDro) to assess risk bias and used pairwise comparison and network meta-analysis with random effects to estimate the summary relative risk. The study has been registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42020200747.. From the 4083 identified manuscripts, 45,067 participants from 53 randomized trials were included in the analysis and randomly assigned to 19 anticoagulants. With Enoxaparin as a control, Rivaroxaban (risk difference 0.07, 95 % credible interval 0.06 to 0.08), Edoxaban (RD 0.09, 95 % CrI 0.08 to 0.11), and Apixaban (RD 0.05, 95 % CrI 0.04 to 0.06) had the best effect in preventing VTE. However, in terms of comprehensive bleeding rate, Apixaban, Edoxaban, and Darexaban were the most effective and stable. Although effective in preventing VTE, bleeding remains relatively high in Rivaroxaban. Enoxaparin is low-molecular-weight heparin that is widely used in clinics, and although its overall efficacy is not the best, its efficacy and safety are very stable.. According to the available data, Apixaban, Edoxaban, and Darexaban are better than any anticoagulants in the prevention of VTE and bleeding during total knee or total hip arthroplasty. In our study, Fondaparinux, Eribaxaban, Dalteparin, Betrixaban, Bemiparin, Reviparin, Acenocoumarol, and Tinzaparin were scarce in the included studies, therefore, more evidence is needed to prove their efficacy and safety.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Enoxaparin; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been widely used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) and the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism. There is an issue with safety, especially in clinically relevant bleeding. We performed a network meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of major gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding associated with NOACs.. Interventions were warfarin, enoxaparin, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. The primary outcome was the incidence of major GI bleeding. A subgroup analysis was performed according to the following indications: AF, deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, and postsurgical prophylaxis.. A total of 29 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 large observation population studies were included. Compared with warfarin, apixaban showed a decreased the risk of major GI bleeding (relative risk [RR] 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.76), and rivaroxaban tended to increase this risk (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.06-1.85). Dabigatran (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.98-1.60), edoxaban (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.69-1.65), and enoxaparin (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.63-2.43) did not significantly increase the risk of GI bleeding than did warfarin. In the subgroup analysis, according to indications, apixaban showed a decreased risk of major GI bleeding (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.34-0.74) than did warfarin in AF studies. Dabigatran (RR 2.36, 95% CI 1.55-3.60, and rivaroxaban (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.10-6.41) increased the risk of major GI bleeding than did apixaban. An analysis of studies on venous thromboembolism or pulmonary embolism showed that no individual NOAC or enoxaparin was associated with an increased risk of major GI bleeding compared to warfarin.. Individual NOACs had varying profiles of GI bleeding risk. Results of analyses including only RCTs and those including both RCTs and population studies showed similar trends, but also showed several differences.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Enoxaparin; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Network Meta-Analysis; Observational Studies as Topic; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants, anti-IIa or anti-Xa, are widely used in the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolic disease as well as in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Direct oral anticoagulants are characterized by a rapid onset of activity, a predictable response and a relatively wide therapeutic window. Nevertheless, theoretical drug interactions exist since direct oral anticoagulants are substrates of the transport protein P-glycoprotein and/or of isoforms of cytochromes P450 pathway. Direct oral anticoagulants do not have a marketing authorization for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis unlike low-molecular-weight heparins which remain the gold standard treatment today. However, recent studies have compared low-molecular-weight heparins to direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis. Results of these studies showed a non-inferiority of direct oral anticoagulants in the prevention of recurrent thromboembolic events but at the cost of an increased hemorrhagic risk, in particular for patients with gastrointestinal and urogenital cancers. Thus, international guidelines, unlike French guidelines, integrate them in first line of the therapeutic strategy of cancer patients. We are certainly entering an era of personalized therapy for cancer-associated thrombosis, considering cancer type and also the theoretical risk of drug interactions with anti-cancer treatments or supportive care.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antineoplastic Agents; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasm Proteins; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thiazoles; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism remains an important but challenging aspect in the treatment of patients with cancer. Recently, alternatives to injection of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) have been introduced, the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which could potentially alleviate patients from burdensome daily injections.. This review discusses the available evidence exploring the role of NOACs in the treatment and secondary prevention of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism, from randomized trials, observational data, contemporary guideline recommendations, and patient perspectives.. Edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and apixaban have proven attractive alternatives to LMWH for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. Contemporary guidelines have promptly endorsed the use of NOACs in patients with most cancer types. Nonetheless, issues remain regarding bleeding risk, interactions with medical cancer treatment, and the effectiveness and safety for extended treatment periods. There are head-to-head comparisons of the NOACs, and therefore no data favoring the use of one NOAC over the others. Patient's preferences are highly diverse and should be part of routine considerations when weighing risks and benefits associated with various available anticoagulant drugs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Currently licenced direct oral anticoagulants selectively target thrombin (eg, dabigatran) or coagulation factor Xa (eg, apixaban, betrixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban). Designed to be given in fixed doses without routine monitoring, direct oral anticoagulants have a lower propensity for food and drug interactions than do vitamin K antagonists, and in randomised controlled trials involving around 250 000 patients, they were at least as effective for prevention and treatment of thrombosis and were associated with a lower risk of life-threatening bleeding. The absolute benefits of direct oral anticoagulants over vitamin K antagonists are modest; however, guidelines recommend them in preference to vitamin K antagonists for most indications because of their ease of use and superior safety. The greatest benefits of direct oral anticoagulants are likely to be in patients who were previously deemed unsuitable for vitamin K antagonist therapy. The emergence of generic preparations is expected to further increase the uptake of direct oral anticoagulants, particularly in countries where they are currently not widely used because of cost. Direct oral anticoagulants are contraindicated in patients with mechanical heart valves and should be used with caution or avoided in patients with advanced kidney or liver disease. In this Therapeutics paper, we review the pharmacology of direct oral anticoagulants, summarise the evidence that led to their approval and incorporation into treatment guidelines, and explore key unresolved issues. We also briefly discuss future perspectives for the development of oral anticoagulants.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has been largely -implemented in the management of venous thromboembolic disease in non-cancer patients. In cancer-associated thrombosis, low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) and especially dalteparin have long been the reference standard therapy. Following the publication of two randomised trials comparing edoxaban and rivaroxaban to -dalteparin, DOACs now represent an alternative with an interesting efficacy and safety profile. Moreover, they offer the comfort of an oral administration and a lower cost. In patients with gastrointestinal or genitourinary cancers however, a higher bleeding risk has been shown with DOACs. LMWHs thus remain the treatment of choice in this group of patients.. L’utilisation des anticoagulants oraux directs (ACOD) pour le traitement de la maladie thromboembolique veineuse (MTEV) chez les patients sans cancer est déjà largement implémentée. En cas de MTEV liée au cancer, les héparines de bas poids moléculaire (HBPM) et en particulier la daltéparine, ont longtemps ­représenté le traitement de référence. Suite à la publication de deux études randomisées récentes comparant l’édoxaban et le rivaroxaban à la daltéparine, les ACOD se sont révélés être une alternative efficace, avec un profil de sécurité satisfaisant, ­offrant par ailleurs le confort d’une administration orale et un coût moindre. Toutefois, en raison d’un risque hémorragique ­accru sous ACOD chez les patients avec un cancer de localisation digestive ou urogénitale, les HBPM restent le traitement de choix dans ce groupe de patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dalteparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Pyridines; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) include dabigatran, which inhibits thrombin, and apixaban, betrixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban, which inhibit factor Xa. In large clinical trials comparing the NOACs with the vitamin K antagonist (VKA) warfarin, dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban and edoxaban were at least as effective for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and for treatment of venous thromboembolism, but were associated with less intracranial bleeding. In addition, the NOACs are more convenient to administer than VKAs because they can be given in fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring. Consequently, the NOACs are now replacing VKAs for these indications, and their use is increasing. Although, as a class, the NOACs have a favourable benefit-risk profile compared with VKAs, choosing among them is complicated because they have not been compared in head-to-head trials. Therefore, selection depends on the results of the individual trials, renal function, the potential for drug-drug interactions and preference for once- or twice-daily dosing. In addition, several 'special situations' were not adequately studied in the dedicated clinical trials. For these situations, knowledge of the unique pharmacological features of the various NOACs and judicious cross-trial comparison can help inform prescription choices. The purpose of this position article is therefore to help clinicians choose the right anticoagulant for the right patient at the right dose by reviewing a variety of special situations not widely studied in clinical trials.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Arginine; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzamides; Biomarkers; Blood Coagulation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa; Heart Diseases; Humans; Piperazines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thrombin; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Approximately one-fifth of all cases of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are related to cancer and anticoagulant treatment in these patients has remained a challenge. Cancer patients with VTE are at increased risk of developing recurrent VTE compared to patients without cancer, but also have a higher risk of major bleeding. In these patients, low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) have been shown to be more effective and as safe as vitamin K-antagonists (VKAs) for the treatment of VTE. Therefore, the majority of current clinical guidelines recommend LMWHs as the treatment of choice for cancer-associated VTE. However, several issues should be considered regarding the use of LMWHs as daily subcutaneous injections, the costs or risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. In recent years, direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown similar efficacy and better safety profile compared to VKAs and have become the standard of care for the treatment of VTE in the general population. Because DOACs offer a simple oral treatment regimen without the need for anticoagulation control, they could be an attractive alternative to LMWH. Before DOACs become an accepted treatment option for cancer associated VTE, they have to be evaluated in a head-to-head comparison with LMWH. Data from two randomized trials comparing DOACs vs. LMWH have recently been published. In the present review, we will provide three clinically relevant questions on the use of DOACs in patients with cancer and VTE and provide an overview on recent evidence on this topic: 1) are DOACs a treatment option for the prevention of VTE in cancer patients?; 2) what is the place for DOACs in patients with cancer-associated VTE?; 3) should I use DOACs for the extended treatment of cancer-related VTE?.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Pyridines; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Cancer accounts for 20% of all venous thromboembolism (VTE) worldwide and cancer patients are at four- to sevenfold increased risk of thrombosis compared to non-cancer patients. VTE is also a morbid complication of cancer and its incidence is rising. Thrombosis is also a second leading cause of death in cancer patients. The standard of care management for the prevention and treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) remains the administration of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs). In the last decade, five direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban and betrixaban, have been approved for the treatment and prevention of VTE in the general patient population. In this review, we discuss the results of the already published clinical trials with DOACs in the treatment of CAT and the ongoing clinical trials with DOACs in the prevention and treatment of CAT.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzamides; Dabigatran; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Cancer patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) are at an elevated risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and of major bleeding while receiving treatment with anticoagulation. Recently, Xa inhibitors have been assessed in cancer patients for the treatment of CAT, providing clinicians and patients with more treatment options.. In this narrative review, the authors evaluate the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and apixaban in the treatment of CAT.. Xa inhibitors are an effective, safe, and convenient option for the treatment of CAT. Overall, they may be associated with a lower risk of recurrent VTE in cancer patients. Certain subgroups of cancer patients may be at increased risk of major bleeding while on treatment with Xa inhibitors, when compared to low-molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH). The current published data suggests an increase in gastrointestinal (GI) major bleeding in patients with GI malignancies. Other patient, treatment, and cancer characteristics may also be associated with a higher risk of major bleeding. Therefore, when assessing the appropriateness of Xa inhibitors for the treatment of CAT, the clinician must take into consideration the known interactions of these drugs, the individualized bleeding risk, and the patient's preferences, in order to make the best possible anticoagulation therapy recommendation.

Topics: Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Background Several studies have investigated the effect of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with cancer, but the results remain controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of NOACs versus warfarin in this population. Methods and Results We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases until February 16, 2019 for studies comparing the effect of NOACs with warfarin in AF patients with cancer. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were extracted and pooled by a random-effects model. Five studies involving 8908 NOACs and 12 440 warfarin users were included. There were no significant associations between cancer status and risks of stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, or death in AF patients. Compared with warfarin, NOACs were associated with decreased risks of stroke or systemic embolism (RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28-0.99), venous thromboembolism (RR, 0.37, 95% CI, 0.22-0.63), and intracranial or gastrointestinal bleeding (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.42-0.98) and with borderline significant reductions in ischemic stroke (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40-1.00) and major bleeding (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53-1.00). In addition, risks of efficacy and safety outcomes of NOACs versus warfarin were similar between AF patients with and without cancer. Conclusions In patients with AF and cancer, compared with warfarin, NOACs had lower or similar rates of thromboembolic and bleeding events and posed a reduced risk of venous thromboembolism.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Vitamin K antagonists were the only choice for chronic oral anticoagulation for more than half a century. Over the past few years, direct oral anticoagulants have emerged, including one direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran etexilate) and three factor Xa inhibitors (apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban). In randomised controlled trials comparing direct oral anticoagulants with traditional vitamin K antagonists, the direct oral anticoagulants all showed a favourable benefit-risk balance in their safety and efficacy profile, in prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation and in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and acute coronary syndrome. In 2008, dabigatran was the first direct oral anticoagulant approved by the European Medicine Agency. Subsequently, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban were also authorised. This article reviews the evidence related to the use of these drugs.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Postoperative Complications; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Withholding Treatment

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a relatively common cardiopulmonary emergency that is a major cause of hospitalization and morbidity and is the primary cause of mortality associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE). During the last decade, one of the biggest changes in the management of PE has been the approval of four non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs; apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban and rivaroxaban) for the treatment of PE and deep vein thrombosis and secondary prevention of VTE. Areas covered: This article reviews the evolving management of PE in the NOAC era and addresses three fundamental questions: who should receive NOACs over conventional heparin/vitamin K antagonist regimens for the treatment of acute PE; should patients be treated as inpatients or outpatients; and how long should patients be treated to reduce the risk of recurrence? Expert commentary: The management of PE is changing. NOACs provide new anticoagulant treatment options for patients with PE, based on Phase III clinical study results. The consistent efficacy and safety profile of NOACs across many PE patient subgroups, including the elderly, fragile patients, those with active cancer and high-risk (right ventricular dysfunction) patients, suggests NOAC use will increase among these patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Humans; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

After the CLOT study, LMWHs (low-molecular weight heparins) have gradually replaced warfarin as the treatment of choice for VTE (venous thromboembolism) in cancer patients. Randomized controlled studies comparing DOACs (direct oral anticoagulants) to LMWHs in cancer patients are still limited. However, new emerging data are supporting the use of DOACs in cancer-associated thrombosis. Areas covered: This review will discuss the recent studies that addressed the utilization of such agents in the treatment of VTE in cancer patients. It will also address challenges that can be encountered while using these agents particularly in cancer patients. Expert commentary: Up until the Hokusai VTE Cancer study, data on the use of DOACs in cancer patients have been limited but supportive of their use in such patients. The Hokusai VTE Cancer study shows that edoxaban is non-inferior to dalteparin in prevention of recurrent VTE but at expense of higher major bleeding namely in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Although further studies involving other DOACs may reinforce the efficacy of DOACs in this population of patients, studies looking at subpopulation of cancer patients may be of more clinical value to clinicians who are trying to balance between treatment of thrombosis and risks of bleeding.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dalteparin; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Humans; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Edoxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor (FXa), is the fourth direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) approved for clinical use in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Latin America, following global approvals for this indication. Edoxaban features some particular characteristics when compared to the previously approved DOACs. This review summarizes the main properties of edoxaban, the outcomes results of its pivotal global clinical trials and the peculiar clinical features of this compound. This practical guide aims to help Latin America clinicians understand edoxaban, its proper indication and its use for the appropriate patients with VTE.

Topics: Humans; Latin America; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Edoxaban is the most recent available representative of the Non-Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC). The approval was based on the largest phase III trials of NOACs for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF, ENGAGE-AF), and for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE, HOKUSAI-VTE). In both trials, edoxaban was associated with similar efficacy and a significant reduction in bleeding events with respect to the pre-defined primary safety endpoints, as compared to warfarin.Additionally, the once daily dosing of edoxaban, the clinically investigated strategy for dose-reduction based on clearly defined criteria and the favorable pharmacokinetic profile might further support the clinical applicability of the substance.In the light of recent data, this expert consensus document aims to summarize the latest clinical trial results while providing a concise overview of current guideline recommendations on the management of patients with non-valvular AF and VTE.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban and edoxaban are the four available new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) which are currently approved for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total hip and knee replacement. Large phase 3 and phase 4 studies comparing NOAC with low molecular weight heparins have shown similar results regarding the efficacy and safety of these two categories of anticoagulants. Management of bleeding complications is a matter of great significance. Three reversal agents have been developed: idarucizumab, andexanet alfa and ciraparantag. Idarucizumab is now commercially available. Regarding the perioperative management of NOAC, two main scientific groups have published their own recommendations. The European Heart Rhythm Association recommends 48-h period of stoppage preoperatively for factor Xa inhibitors and at least 3 or 4 days for dabigatran, while the French Study Group on Thrombosis and Haemostasis recommends 5-day discontinuation for all NOAC. Conventional clot tests can only be used as rough indicators for laboratory assessment of the activity of NOAC. Specific laboratory tests have been developed for more accurate measurements of NOAC blood levels, including a dilute thrombin time test (Hemoclot test) and the ecarin clot test for dabigatran and chromogenic anti-factor Xa assays for direct factor Xa inhibitors. Due to the beneficial properties of NOAC, these drugs are gaining ground in daily orthopaedic practice, and many studies are being conducted in order to extend the indications of these anticoagulants agents.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Arginine; Blood Coagulation Tests; Dabigatran; Factor Xa; Hemorrhage; Humans; Orthopedic Procedures; Piperazines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Edoxaban is the most recently approved factor Xa inhibitor within the class of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Like other DOACs, edoxaban was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of venous thromboembolism and prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Similar to other DOACs, edoxaban has fewer drug-drug interactions than warfarin and does not require routine laboratory monitoring. Unlike other DOACs, edoxaban has yet to be approved for secondary or postoperative venous thromboembolism thromboprophylaxis. Currently no antidote for edoxaban is available. To optimally prescribe agents in the DOAC class, it is critical that providers 1) understand how the agents compare; and 2) identify specific settings in which one agent may be preferred over another.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were developed to compensate for the demerits of warfarin. In Japan, three factor Xa inhibitors are used for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE): edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. Despite problems, such as the inability to monitor their effect and the lack of an antidote, these inhibitors have the same efficacy as conventional treatment with warfarin, and they are associated with a significantly high degree of safety in relation to hemorrhagic complications. East Asians, including Japanese, suffer from hemorrhage more frequently; therefore, DOACs are considered to be highly effective. Although there is no evidence to date, DOACs may be effective in a wide variety of ways, including the possibility that they prevent recurrence over the long term, reduce the length of hospitalization, allow treatment to be started on an outpatient basis, and be effective in cancer patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Japan; Neoplasms; Outpatients; Platelet Count; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Cancer patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at increased risk for both bleeding and VTE recurrence. Anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is the standard of care during the initial and long-term treatment phase (i.e. during the first 3 - 6 months of therapy) based on its overall beneficial safety and efficacy profile compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran are approved for the treatment of acute VTE, and the combined six phase-3 trials have included > 1500 patients with active cancer, as defined by variable selection criteria. Subgroup analyses of these patients, either pooled or separately reported, suggest that DOACs could be a safe and efficacious alternative to VKA therapy for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE. However, the populations of cancer patients included in the DOAC and LMWH trials are not comparable with regard to mortality and VTE risk, and no specific data from direct head-to-head comparisons of DOACs with LMWHs are currently available. The use of DOACs for the management of VTE in cancer is thus not recommended by clinical practice guidelines.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Guideline Adherence; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Long-Term Care; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

It is unclear if the risk of intraocular bleeding with novel oral anticoagulants differs compared with warfarin.. To characterize the risk of intraocular bleeding with novel oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin.. A systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken in an academic medical setting. MEDLINE and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized clinical trials published up until August 2016. This search was supplemented by manual bibliography searches of identified trials and other review articles.. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were phase 3 randomized clinical trials, enrolled patients with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism, compared a novel oral anticoagulant (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban) with warfarin, and recorded event data on intraocular bleeding. Data on intraocular bleeding were pooled using inverse-variance, weighted, fixed-effects meta-analysis.. The PRISMA guidelines were used for abstracting data and assessing quality. Independent extraction was performed by 2 investigators.. Intraocular bleeding events and associated risk ratio for novel oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin.. Twelve trials investigating 102 627 patients were included. Randomization to novel oral anticoagulants was associated with a 22% relative reduction in intraocular bleeding compared with warfarin (risk ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61-0.99). There was no significant heterogeneity observed (I2 = 4.8%, P = .40). Comparably lower risks of intraocular bleeding with novel oral anticoagulants were seen in subgroup analyses, with no significant difference according to the indication for anticoagulation (P for heterogeneity = .49) or the novel oral anticoagulant type (P for heterogeneity = .15). Summary estimates did not differ materially when random-effects meta-analytic techniques were used.. These results suggest that novel oral anticoagulants reduce the risk of intraocular bleeding by approximately one-fifth compared with warfarin. Similar benefits were seen in both patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Our data have particular relevance for patients at higher risk of spontaneous retinal and subretinal bleeding. These findings may also have important implications in the perioperative period, in which the use of novel oral anticoagulants may be superior. Future studies are required to better characterize the optimal management of patients with both ophthalmic disease and cardiovascular comorbidities requiring anticoagulation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Eye Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

After arthroplasty treatment, some complications commonly occur, such as early revision, infection/dislocation, and venous thromboembolism (VTE). This study aims to use a network meta-analysis to compare effects of 9 anticoagulant drugs (edoxaban, dabigatan, apixaban, rivaroxaban, warfarin, heparin, bemiparin, ximelagatran, and enoxaparin) in preventing postoperative complications in arthroplasty patients.. After retrieving PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library database from the inception to November 2016, randomized controlled trials were enrolled. The integration of direct and indirect evidences was performed to calculate odd ratios and the surface under the cumulative ranking curves. Nineteen eligible randomized controlled trials were included.. The network meta-analysis results showed that compared with warfarin, edoxaban, apixaban, and rivaroxaban had a lower incidence rate in asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis, which indicated that edoxaban, apixaban, and rivaroxaban had better effects on prevention. Similarly, in comparison to enoxaparin, edoxaban and rivaroxaban had better effect; rivaroxaban was better than ximelagatran in preventive effects. Compared with apixaban, edoxaban, dabigatan, rivaroxaban, and enoxaparin had a higher incidence rate in clinically relevant non-major bleeding, which showed that preventive effects were relatively poor. In addition, the results of the surface under the cumulative ranking curves showed that rivaroxaban and bemiparin worked best on symptomatic deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. In terms of bleeding, apixaban and warfarin had better preventive effects.. Our findings suggested that rivaroxaban may work better in terms of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, whereas apixaban had better preventive effects in bleeding.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Dabigatran; Enoxaparin; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Postoperative Complications; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Enzalutamide, a novel, oral androgen receptor antagonist used for the treatment of metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer, has been shown to improve overall and progression-free survival, prolong time to initiation of chemotherapy, reduce skeletal-related events, and carry a favorable adverse effect profile. Metastatic prostate cancer is a disease of older men, a population with an increased incidence of medical comorbidities warranting anticoagulation. Prostate cancer itself, along with some of its therapies, is also prothrombotic. Enzalutamide interacts with several anticoagulants through various mechanisms, making their concurrent use clinically challenging. As such, complex decisions about anticoagulation in these patients are frequently encountered by treating physicians. In this review, we describe the potential interactions between enzalutamide and various anticoagulants, and suggest management paradigms based on the current body of knowledge for patients with atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism, and mechanical heart valves.

Topics: Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzamides; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Embolism; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Male; Nitriles; Phenylthiohydantoin; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common disease with high risk for death and recurrence and can severely impair patients' quality of life. Despite decades of study on this troublesome disease, there are still many unsolved problems in terms of pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. Hundreds of articles with various study methods and controversial research results are published every year. Thus it is crucial to keep track of reliable recent studies and articles on VTE in order to better understand it and to handle intricate related clinical events more reasonably. We reviewed high-qualified articles and guidelines from recent years and summarized VTE-related progresses in this review.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation Factors; Computed Tomography Angiography; Dabigatran; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Heparin; Humans; Phlebography; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Quality of Life; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Recent findings require an update of previous recommendations for the perioperative use of Direct Oral AntiCoagulants (DOACs). A break in preoperative treatment of 24-96 hours is recommended based on the pharmacokinetic profiles of DOACs and depends on individual patient characteristics, their renal and possibly liver function, and their surgery-related risk of bleeding. In cases of renal or hepatic insufficiency, whether to extend the preoperative interruption of IIa- and Xa-inhibitors is a clinical decision that must be reached on an individual patient basis. In cases of epidural or spinal anaesthesia, more conservative pausing-intervals are recommended due to the risk of persistent neurologic deficits (e.g., paraplegia) following the development of spinal subdural and epidural haematomas. Elective surgery should be postponed according to these recommendations. Preoperative "bridging" with LMWH (more precisely referred to as "switching") should be omitted due to a significantly increased risk of bleeding. In addition, the incidence of perioperative thromboembolic risks, such as DVT, PE, and stroke, are no different whether interruption or "switching" is undertaken. Postoperatively, the DOACs can be reinstituted within the first 24 hours. In cases of major surgery or if there is a higher risk of bleeding, resumption of DOACS should only begin after 24-72 hours. In patients with an elevated thromboembolic risk, transient postoperative LMWH administration can be recommended during this period.Interaction of DOACs with other drugs usually occurs during the absorption, transport and elimination of these drugs. Therefore, substance- specific restrictions and recommendations should be observed during these times. In everyday clinical practice, webbased, independent information portals on drug-interactions are very helpful in providing safe and rapid information about potential interactions when DOACs are used in combination with other drugs, especially during perioperative management.Non-adherence to medications is a worldwide problem that has dangerous and costly consequences. Present data suggest that persistence is the primary factor that supports adherence. Despite the adherence data presented in the DOACS approval studies (e.g., persistence in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism has been reported to be between 94-99%), the first registries and meta-analyses provide sobering results regarding the incidence of persistence and the success rate of i. Aktuelle Erkenntnisse erfordern die Aktualisierung früherer Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Einsatz von direkte orale Antikoagulanzien (DOAKs). Auf Grundlage der pharmakokinetischen Profile wird in Abhängigkeit von Nierenfunktion, ggf. Leberfunktion sowie individuellem und eingriffsspezifischem Blutungsrisiko eine präoperative Pausierung von 24–96 Stunden in Abhängigkeit von dem verwendeten DOAK empfohlen. Bei schwerer Nieren- oder Leberinsuffizienz ist es eine individuelle, klinische Entscheidung, die präoperative Pause für die Xa-inhibitoren zu verlängern. Für Patienten mit rückenmarksnahen Regionalanästhesieverfahren gelten aufgrund des Risikos von spinal sub- und epiduralen Hämatomen und dem Risiko bleibender schwerer neurologischer Defizite (Querschnittslähmung) sehr konservative Intervalle im oberen Pausierungsbereich. Ein bereits präoperativ beginnendes „Bridging” mit NMH (eigentlich „Switching”) sollte wegen signifikant erhöhter Blutungsrisiken unterbleiben. Das perioperative Thromboembolierisiko (z.B. Thrombose, Lungenembolie, Hirninfarkt) ist nach einer präoperativen Pause bzw. einem präoperativen „Switching” nicht unterschiedlich. Postoperativ können DOAKs innerhalb von 24 h, nach größeren Eingriffen bzw. höherem Blutungsrisiko erst nach 24–72 Stunden wiederaufgenommen werden. Eine postoperative, passagere Umstellung auf eine NMH-Gabe („Switching”) bei erhöhtem venösem Thromboembolierisiko kann in diesem Zeitraum erfolgen.Medikamenteninteraktionen von direkten oralen Antikoagulanzien treten meist bei der Absorption, beim Transport und bei der Elimination von anderen Medikamenten auf. Hierbei sind substanzspezifische Einschränkungen und Empfehlungen zu beachten. Um im klinischen Alltag eine sichere und schnelle Information, auch über DOAKs in Kombination mit anderen Medikamenten im perioperativen Management, zu erhalten, sind webbasierte, unabhängige Informationsportale sehr hilfreich.Die Non-Adhärenz von Medikamenten ist weltweit verbreitet, ist gefährlich und teuer in ihren Folgen. Die aktuellen Daten beschreiben vorwiegend die Persistenz als ein orientierendes Maß für die Adhärenz. Unabhängig von den Zulassungsstudien der DOAKs (Persistenz bei der Therapie akuter venöser Thromboembolien zwischen 94 – 99%) liefern erste Register und Metaanalysen ernüchternde Ergebnisse zur Persistenz und zur Verbesserung der Adhärenz der DOAKs in der Langzeitanwendung.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Drug Substitution; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Kidney Function Tests; Liver Function Tests; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Perioperative Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are likely to have a major impact in the next few years, changing clinical practice of anticoagulation therapy. Evidence on its efficacy and superiority to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in treating non-cancer patients have been reported in a few clinical trials. However, patients with cancer are complicated by the prothrombotic nature of the disease, need for potentially invasive surgery and interventions, and altered drug handling. This chapter examines the available evidence and guidelines on the use of NOAC in patients with cancer.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Catheters, Indwelling; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Dosage Calculations; Humans; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Pulmonary embolism (PE) affects >600,000 patients per year in the United States. Evaluation includes clinical decision rules, laboratory tests, and several imaging modalities. The diagnosis of PE has risen in recent years, particularly subsegmental PE (SSPE). Controversy exists concerning the diagnosis and treatment of these lesions.. We sought to provide emergency physicians with a review of the controversies surrounding PE testing and the diagnosis and treatment of SSPE.. With the rise of computed tomography (CT) testing for PE, diagnosis has increased. Providers often omit risk stratification in favor of D-dimer or imaging, which does not have literature support. The detection of PE has risen by 80%, and this increased testing is associated with several risks, including contrast reaction, nephropathy, and increased radiation. SSPE diagnosis has risen with improved imaging technology, but the literature shows low interobserver agreement with diagnosis of true SSPE. Studies disagree on the clinical significance and dangers of this PE subset. The American College of Chest Physicians 2016 guidelines recommend withholding anticoagulation for SSPE with low risk for recurrent thrombus and no concurrent deep vein thrombosis. Patients at high risk for recurrent venous thromboembolism or with deep vein thrombosis warrant anticoagulation. The provider is ultimately responsible for appropriate evaluation with risk stratification and selective testing.. SSPE presents a quandary, because the literature differs in showing harm despite increased diagnosis. American College of Chest Physicians guidelines for the treatment of SSPE take into account the patient, the imaging, and other imaging modalities. Providers should use risk stratification with shared decision-making in the evaluation and treatment of SSPE.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Decision Making; Humans; Patient Outcome Assessment; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Venous Thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication that manifests during and/or after hospitalization, as well as postsurgeries including orthopedic surgeries. Edoxaban is a new oral direct factor Xa inhibitor that has been recently approved for treating VTE in patients who have already been treated with a parenteral anticoagulant and for the prevention of stroke and non-central nervous system systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of edoxaban for VTE prophylaxis after lower limb orthopedic surgery.. A comprehensive search was conducted in Google Scholar, PubMed, MEDLINE, and ScienceDirect to identify potential records, then titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened using the inclusion criteria to filter out irrelevant studies. Moreover, the data extraction and quality assessment were undertaken using standardized tools, and the results were narratively synthesized and presented in tables.. Six studies were included in this systematic review after screening 2989 records. The majority of studies demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in VTE events in the edoxaban group(s) compared to the dalteparin, placebo, or enoxaparin groups (P < .05). The differences in VTE cases in some studies reached to approximately 50% favoring edoxaban 30 mg over the comparator (P < .05). However, other studies uncovered a statistically insignificant difference between edoxaban and the comparator "enoxaparin" when used for VTE prophylaxis (P > .05). On the other hand, although edoxaban found to cause more bleeding, the differences between edoxaban and the comparator are statistically insignificant (P > .05).. This study helped to amalgamate evidence with regard to the use of edoxaban for VTE prophylaxis post-lower limb orthopedic surgery. In line with the results of the reviewed studies, edoxaban seems to be highly effective in reducing VTE post-lower limb orthopedic surgery.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Orthopedic Procedures; Patient Safety; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, safety, and place in therapy of edoxaban for prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are reviewed.. Although warfarin has been an established therapy for stroke prevention in AF and VTE, the need for agents with less monitoring requirements, fewer food and drug interactions, and a lower risk of major bleeding led to the development of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Current DOACs work by either directly blocking thrombin (dabigatran) or inhibiting factor Xa (apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban). Edoxaban is the newest DOAC and only the second Food and Drug Administration-approved anticoagulant for once-daily administration. Unlike apixaban and rivaroxaban, edoxaban does not interact with the cytochrome P-450 system. The results of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 and Hokusai-VTE trials demonstrated edoxaban's noninferiority to warfarin. However, the adverse-effect profile of edoxaban may limit the drug's use in clinical practice; in clinical trials, patients with AF who had a creatinine clearance of ≥95 mL/min had a higher rate of strokes with the use of edoxaban versus warfarin.. A review of the literature showed that edoxaban, the most recently approved DOAC, is noninferior to warfarin for management of VTE (after parenteral anticoagulant therapy) and for stroke risk reduction in many patients with nonvalvular AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Approximately 900,000 people are affected by some sort of venous thromboembolic (VTE) event every year in the United States. VTE diagnosis used to mean treatment with medications that required routine lab monitoring for safety and efficacy. Activated factor X (FXa) inhibition has emerged as a convenient pathway for management of VTE and currently three FXa inhibitors are available for anticoagulation management - rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban. Continued development of medications utilizing this pathway may offer advantages via novel pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic properties that may minimize the adverse effects associated with traditional anticoagulant therapy. This review summarizes the available information regarding pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and early safety and efficacy data for three factor Xa inhibitors being developed - darexaban, betrixaban and nokxaban. The studies reviewed in this article suggests that three newer agents possess the potential for promise based on early phase I and II trials.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Azepines; Benzamides; Blood Coagulation; Drug Discovery; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Edoxaban is the fourth non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant now available for clinical use in the prevention of stroke/systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation (AF) and in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE), after the completion of large-scale randomized comparative clinical trials with the vitamin K antagonist warfarin. Edoxaban has some peculiar pharmacological properties and outcome data. Here a group of experts in AF and VTE answers a set of questions on its practical use, trying to define the profile of patients that would be most appropriate for its use.

Topics: Age Factors; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Humans; Medication Therapy Management; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are effective in preventing and treating venous thromboembolism, and preventing stroke in atrial fibrillation. Until recently, there has been no specific reversal agent for DOACs. Now, a specific antidote for the direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran has been approved for use, and antidotes for factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban) are being developed. We review the evidence for currently used and emerging reversal strategies, and discuss possible clinical implications, including increased prescription of DOACs, use of DOACs in clinical situations previously felt to pose too great a risk of bleeding, and use of reversal agents beyond currently approved indications.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Arginine; Dabigatran; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Piperazines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used for prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and for prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. In phase III clinical trials that included more than 100,000 patients, the DOACs were at least as effective as vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and were associated with less serious bleeding, particularly less intracranial bleeding. Real-world evidence supports these outcomes. Despite this, some physicians and patients are concerned about serious bleeding or emergencies unless specific reversal agents for the DOACs are available. However, in clinical trials performed without reversal agents, the outcome of major bleeds was similar or better in patients receiving DOACs than in those taking VKAs. Because of their short half-lives, supportive measures are sufficient to manage most bleeds in patients receiving DOACs. Anticoagulant reversal should only be considered with life-threatening bleeds, with bleeds that fail to respond to usual measures and in patients requiring urgent surgery. Idarucizumab is licensed for dabigatran reversal and andexanet alfa is likely to be soon licensed for reversal of rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban. To ensure responsible use of these agents, every hospital needs a bleeding management algorithm that identifies patients eligible for reversal and outlines appropriate dosing regimens.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa; Forecasting; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Current evidence indicates that heart failure (HF) confers a hyper-coagulable state that is associated with adverse events including stroke, systemic embolism, and mortality. This may be due to the elevated levels of pro-thrombotic and pro-inflammatory cytokines that are seen in patients with acute and chronic HF. Left ventricular wall motion abnormalities in patients with systolic dysfunction predispose to local thrombosis due to blood stasis as does atrial fibrillation (AF) which leads to blood stasis in regions of the atria. The high risk of thromboemboli in HF patients with AF has resulted in the use anticoagulation therapy to prevent the occurrence of catastrophic events. There is evidence, however, that the pro-inflammatory, pro-thrombotic state that exists in HF puts patients who are in sinus rhythm at risk. The novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been shown in RCT to have at least equivalent efficacy in reducing stroke as warfarin while exposing patients to a lower risk of bleeding. The fact that the NOACs don't require routine monitoring to assure that patients remain within the therapeutic range and have relatively simple dosing requirements and a safer risk profile makes them attractive substitutes to warfarin in HF patients with atrial fibrillation and other conditions (e.g. deep venous thrombosis). Post hoc analyses from a subset of HF patients from the RCTs in AF patients have demonstrated similar findings as were reported in the entire populations that were included in the trials. As a result, NOACS are commonly used now in HF patients with AF. For HF patients with reduced ejection fraction in sinus rhythm, the use of warfarin in randomized clinical trials (RCT) to reduce stroke has been disappointing and associated with increase bleeding risk when compared to aspirin. The advantages of the NOACs over warfarin, however, raise the question of whether they might improve outcomes in HF patients who are in sinus rhythm. The currently ongoing COMMANDER-HF trial has been designed to address this issue. In this chapter we review evidence of existence of a prothombotic state in HF, the pharmacodynamics and clinical trials of the NOACs and the outcomes from NOAC substudies in the HF subgroup. We also discuss the rationale for using anticoagulation in HF independent of arrhythmia burden.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Emergency physicians make treatment decisions in patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). They also encounter patients on target-specific oral anticoagulants (TSOACs) who require urgent intervention. New approvals and increasing prescriptions for TSOACs (e.g., apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban) for the management of several thromboembolic disorders warrant an evaluation of the impact of these agents in the ED setting.. This review discusses the use of TSOACs in the ED for the treatment of acute VTE, and highlights strategies for the management of patients on TSOACs who present to the ED with other complications, such as bleeding complications or requiring emergency surgery.. Apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban have been approved for the treatment of acute VTE. We discuss the impact of this on ED management of TSOAC-naïve patients and highlight results with TSOACs in high-risk subgroups including the elderly and those with prior VTE or active cancer. This review also discusses management strategies for patients on TSOACs. For emergency physicians, strategies for the management of bleeding, approaches to patient care when emergency surgery is needed, laboratory assays for measuring plasma concentrations of TSOACs, and drug-drug interactions are of special importance.. Familiarity with TSOACs will better position emergency physicians to provide state-of-the art care to their patients with VTE and help them manage potentially complicated circumstances related to the chronic use of these drugs.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation Tests; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Emergency Service, Hospital; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

To review clinical data on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) used in the acute treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) as well as practical considerations when using these products.. Searches of PubMed and Google Scholar for VTE, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and relevant drug international nonproprietary names were conducted. Additional online searches were conducted for prescribing information.. Relevant articles on dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban for the management of VTE compared with oral vitamin K antagonists (VKAs; published between 1966 and December 2015) were reviewed and summarized, together with information on dosing, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and drug-drug interactions.. The DOACs have the potential to circumvent many of the disadvantages of VKAs. At a minimum, they greatly increase the available therapeutic options, thus providing a greater opportunity for clinicians to select a management option that best fits the needs of individual patients. Despite the significant advance that DOACs represent, they are not without risk and require careful consideration of a number of clinical issues to optimize safety and efficacy.. The emergence of DOACs for the management of thromboembolic disorders represents a paradigm shift from oral VKAs. The DOACs provide similar efficacy and improved safety in selected patients as compared with VKAs. Clinicians treating VTE need to be familiar with the intricacies involved in using these agents, including the appropriate dose selection for the relevant indication, avoidance of drug-drug and drug-disease interactions, and consideration of dose adjustments in specific clinical situations, such as organ dysfunction.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Humans; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

In recent years, small oral compounds that specifically block activated coagulation factor X (FXa) or thrombin (FIIa) have become alternatives to the anticoagulants that had been used for several decades. As of today, these direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) include dabigatran etexilate (thrombin inhibitor) and apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban (inhibitors of FXa). While there is no doubt that DOACs represent a major step forward in the management of patients with venous thromboembolic disease and atrial fibrillation, new challenges have arisen. They need to be addressed with the necessary pragmatism on the basis of evidence. Indeed, a better understanding of the management of these last-generation antithrombotics will favour safer use and increase confidence of the practitioner for the prescription of these drugs. The aim of this article is to present practical suggestions for the prescription and use of these drugs in everyday clinical practice, based on clinical experience and recently updated recommendations of the European Heart Rhythm Association and the American College of Chest Physicians among other scientific organisations. We address issues such as pharmacokinetics, dosing, side effects, limitations of use, drug interactions, switching from and to other anticoagulants, renal function, concomitant administration of antiplatelet agents and perioperative use. We also address the issue of monitoring and reversal, taking advantage of the most recent development in this latter area. Rather than being one additional set of recommendations, our narrative review aims at assisting the practicing physician in his or her daily handling of these novel anticoagulant compounds, based on frequently asked questions to the authors, a group of experienced specialists in the field who have, however, no commitment to issue guidelines.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Oral anticoagulation is the therapeutic cornerstone in preventing thromboembolic risk in both atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE). After decades of the sole therapeutic oral anticoagulation option being warfarin, the introduction of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants has heralded a new era. Edoxaban is the latest addition to these available for clinical use. Edoxaban was as effective and safer than warfarin in preventing thromboembolic risk in AF patients. Similarly, edoxaban effectiveness and safety was evident when treating VTE patients to prevent recurrent VTE or VTE-related death. Therefore, edoxaban represents a valuable alternative in treating thromboembolic risk for AF and VTE patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Coagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridines; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Humans; Outpatients; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Gender differences have been reported in patients with acute VTE treated with antithrombotic drugs.. To address the relationship between gender and new oral anticoagulants (NOACs), we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the incidence of recurrent VTE and major plus clinically relevant non-major bleedings in males and females, with acute VTE, treated with NOACs over the treatment period.. Systematic review and meta-analysis of double blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs).. MEDLINE, Cochrane Library of Clinical Trials (up to September 2015).. RCTs that compared the beneficial and harmful effects of NOAC drugs (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban and rivaroxaban).. Three authors abstracted data. Study-specific risk ratios (RR) were combined using random-effects model.. Nine studies including 16,372 patients were selected. No significant difference for the incidence of recurrent VTE was found between men and women. Compared to men, women had a higher incidence of major bleedings plus clinically relevant minor bleedings (5.3% and 7.9% respectively; RR: 0.635; 95% CI: 0.54-0.74; p<0.001). The subgroup analysis showed a significant gender difference in incidence of major bleedings and clinically relevant minor bleedings only for Edoxaban (RR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.42-0.64; p<0.001).. This meta-analysis showed, compared to men, a higher risk of bleeding in women with acute VTE treated with NOACs. Future trials should evaluate the effect of gender on bleeding in patients with acute VTE treated with NOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Sex Characteristics; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common disease associated with high risk for recurrences, death, and late sequelae, accounting for substantial health care costs. Anticoagulant agents are the mainstay of treatment for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The recent availability of oral anticoagulant agents that can be administered in fixed doses, without laboratory monitoring and dose adjustment, is a landmark change in the treatment of VTE. In Phase III trials, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban (antifactor Xa agents), and dabigatran (an antithrombin agent) were noninferior and probably safer than conventional anticoagulation therapy (low-molecular-weight heparin followed by vitamin K antagonists). These favorable results were confirmed in specific patient subgroups, such as the elderly and fragile. However, some patients, such as those with cancer or with intermediate- to high-risk pulmonary embolism, were underrepresented in the Phase III trials. Further clinical research is required before new oral anticoagulant agents can be considered standard of care for the full spectrum of patients with VTE.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Middle Aged; Phlebography; Prognosis; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Survival Analysis; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Edoxaban is a once-daily oral inhibitor of factor Xa, currently indicated to reduce the risk of stroke or systemic embolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients and for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism (EMA, FDA and Japan). The ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 and the Hokusai-VTE trials demonstrated that edoxaban was at least as effective as warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients, as well as for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism, but with a lesser risk of bleeding in both cases. In addition, it seems a cost-effective strategy for the management of this population. In this review, the implications of the most recent available evidence about edoxaban in clinical practice will be updated.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Worldwide, venous thromboembolism (VTE) is among the leading causes of death from cardiovascular disease, surpassed only by acute myocardial infarction and stroke. The spectrum of VTE presentations ranges, by degree of severity, from deep vein thrombosis to acute pulmonary thromboembolism. Treatment is based on full anticoagulation of the patients. For many decades, it has been known that anticoagulation directly affects the mortality associated with VTE. Until the beginning of this century, anticoagulant therapy was based on the use of unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin and vitamin K antagonists, warfarin in particular. Over the past decades, new classes of anticoagulants have been developed, such as factor Xa inhibitors and direct thrombin inhibitors, which significantly changed the therapeutic arsenal against VTE, due to their efficacy and safety when compared with the conventional treatment. The focus of this review was on evaluating the role of these new anticoagulants in this clinical context.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

This article serves as a review of the current literature regarding the role of edoxaban for the prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE).. Until recent years, oral treatment options for both treatment and prevention of VTE and stroke were limited to warfarin. Dabigatran was the first new oral anticoagulant approved in over 50 years followed by rivaroxaban and apixaban. These new oral anticoagulants offer many benefits over warfarin. Edoxaban is the newest member among the oral anticoagulants and exerts its action by direct inhibition of factor Xa. It may offer some advantages in that it is the second Food and Drug Administration-approved once-daily anticoagulant available and does not interact with the cytochrome P450 (CYP450) system. However, there are concerns in patients with AF and preserved renal function (>95 mL/min), as these cohorts experienced a higher incidence of stroke in trials.. Based on the 3 clinical trials, edoxaban appears to be a safe and effective factor Xa inhibitor in patients with a creatinine clearance of <95 mL/min. It will serve as an alternative anticoagulant for those with a preference for once-daily dosing and/or taking medications that interact with the CYP450 system.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Four non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) have been approved in the United States for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolic disease. They have been as or more effective than the prior standards of care, with less fatal or intracranial bleeding, fewer drug and dietary interactions, and greater patient convenience. Nonetheless, the absence of the ability for clinicians to assess compliance or washout with a simple laboratory test (or to adjust dosing with a similar assessment) and the absence of an antidote to rapidly stop major hemorrhage or to enhance safety in the setting of emergent or urgent surgery/procedures have been limitations to greater non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant usage and better thromboembolic prevention. Accordingly, a Cardiac Research Safety Consortium "think tank" meeting was held in February 2015 to address these concerns. This manuscript reports on the discussions held and the conclusions reached at that meeting.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antidotes; Antithrombins; Arginine; Atrial Fibrillation; Congresses as Topic; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Piperazines; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thrombin Time; Venous Thromboembolism

The new generation of target-specific oral anticoagulants is being prescribed for increasing numbers of patients at risk of stroke or venous thromboembolism (VTE). These drugs offer valuable benefits due to fast onset anticoagulation, a fixed anticoagulation effect (allowing administration of specified doses), and no requirement for routine monitoring. Edoxaban is a fast-acting oral anticoagulant, approved for use in the prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and in the treatment of acute VTE. Like many of the new oral anticoagulants, it selectively inhibits factor Xa, in a concentration-dependent manner. Multiple Phase II clinical trials have shown edoxaban to be noninferior to vitamin K antagonists in the prevention of stroke and VTE, with a good safety profile. To date, the pivotal studies to endorse edoxaban's clinical use have been ENGAGE AF-TIMI and Hokusai-VTE, both of which have compared its efficacy to standard warfarin treatment. This paper aims at reviewing the use of edoxaban in the management of stroke and thromboembolic disease, highlighting the key study results that have led to its current license.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are rapidly replacing vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The DOACs include dabigatran, which inhibits thrombin, and rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, which inhibit factor Xa. When compared with conventional VTE treatment consisting of a parenteral anticoagulant followed by a VKA, the DOACs were equally effective for prevention of recurrence, but were associated with less bleeding. With similar efficacy, better safety, and the convenience of fixed dosing without the need for routine coagulation monitoring, guidelines now recommend DOACs over VKAs for VTE treatment in patients without active cancer. Nonetheless, measures are needed to optimize the safety of DOACs. Focusing on these measures, this paper summarizes the results of phase III trials evaluating DOACs for VTE treatment; identifies which VTE patients are or are not candidates for DOACs; provides guidance on how to choose among DOACs; lists the licensed dosing information for DOACs; discusses the optimal treatment duration for VTE; describes periprocedural management of DOACs in patients requiring surgery or intervention; and finally, reviews the management of bleeding, including the role for specific reversal agents.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Coagulants; Dabigatran; Humans; Patient Safety; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

In studying the comparative effectiveness of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in orthopedic surgery and in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, previous meta-analyses have found no proof of difference in head-to-head indirect comparisons between individual agents. However, the question of their therapeutic equivalence remains unanswered.. The objective of this analysis was to test the equivalence of three NOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) in orthopedic surgery and four NOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) in non-valvular atrial fibrillation.. Standard pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis for indirect comparisons were combined with equivalence testing. The endpoint was venous thromboembolism in orthopedic surgery and a composite of stroke or systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation. Comparisons were expressed as risk difference (RD). Margins for equivalence testing were derived from the original trials.. Our results indicate that rivaroxaban and apixaban (but not dabigatran) are equivalent for thromboprophylaxis in orthopedic surgery. In atrial fibrillation, all the four NOACs we tested were found to meet the criterion of therapeutic equivalence. Some concern, however, is raised by some findings focused on adverse events of these agents, in which the equivalence was not proven in all analyses.. Regardless of clinical implications, our results can be the basis to develop local acquisition tenderings on NOACS. In Italy, a new law has been issued according to which equivalence analyses have become a mandatory prerequisite for local tenderings.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Orthopedic Procedures; Patient Safety; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Therapeutic Equivalency; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

The prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a clinical challenge, primarily owing to drawbacks associated with the use of heparins and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). These and other factors, including a growing elderly population, mean that VTE presents a continuing burden to patients and physicians. Anticoagulant therapy is a fundamental approach for VTE management. Non-VKA oral anticoagulants, including the factor Xa inhibitors apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban, and the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, have been studied in phase III trials across a spectrum of thromboembolic disorders. These agents offer simplified care, with similar or improved efficacy and safety outcomes compared with heparins and vitamin K antagonists. There are several factors a physician must consider when prescribing an anticoagulant. An important consideration with all anticoagulant use is bleeding risk, especially in high-risk groups such as the elderly or those with renal impairment or cancer. In orthopaedic patients, other risks include a need for surgical revision or blood transfusion, or wound complications. Therefore, the clinical benefits of an anticoagulant should ideally be balanced with any risks associated with the therapy. Quantitative benefit-risk assessments are lacking, and owing to differences in trial design the non-VKA oral anticoagulants cannot be compared directly. Based on trial and "real-life" data, this review will summarise the clinical data for the non-VKA oral anticoagulants in the prevention and treatment of VTE, focusing on the balance between the benefits and risks of anticoagulation with these drugs, and their potential impact on VTE management.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Male; Orthopedic Procedures; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) causes substantial morbidity and mortality worldwide. The traditional treatment of VTE, with an initial therapy with (low molecular weight) heparin or fondaparinux and a continued treatment with vitamin K antagonists, is effective but has limitations.. The current review summarizes the results of the Phase III trials with the new oral direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban and provides a meta-analysis of these trials in the subgroups of elderly patients (> 75 years) and patients with impaired renal function.. The practical use of direct Xa inhibitors in the treatment of VTE in general and in specific subgroups is discussed. For elderly patients, patients with extremes of body weight, cancer patients or patients with moderate renal impairment, pooled data suggest that the direct oral Xa inhibitors are a reasonable alternative to standard therapy. For other indications, such as treatment of VTE in children, during pregnancy or in the context of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, further data from clinical trials are needed.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

The target-specific oral anticoagulants are a class of agents that inhibit factor Xa or thrombin. They are effective and safe compared to warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and for the treatment of venous thromboembolism, and they are comparable to low-molecular-weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip or knee arthroplasty. For other indications, however, such as the prevention of stroke in patients with mechanical heart valves, initial studies have been unfavorable for the newer agents, leaving warfarin the anticoagulant of choice. Further studies are needed before the target-specific anticoagulants can be recommended for patients with cancer-associated thrombosis or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Concerns also persist about difficulties with the laboratory assessment of anticoagulant effect and the lack of a specific reversal agent. For these reasons, we anticipate that the vitamin K antagonists will continue to be important anticoagulants for years to come.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Edoxaban, an oral direct inhibitor of factor Xa, was recently approved in the United States and Japan for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and for treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). It is also licensed in Japan for prevention of VTE after major orthopedic surgery. Although routine laboratory monitoring of edoxaban is not required, laboratory measurement may be desirable in special circumstances. Our objective was to provide a systematic review of current evidence on laboratory measurement of the anticoagulant activity of edoxaban. PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies that reported a relationship between coagulation tests and plasma edoxaban levels. Study quality was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2). We identified 9 eligible studies. Anti-Xa activity is linear across a broad range of drug levels (R (2) > 0.95) and may be used for edoxaban quantification. The assay shows greater variability at above on-therapy drug concentrations. The PT is less sensitive to edoxaban. A normal prothrombin time may not exclude clinically relevant on-therapy drug levels. The activated partial thromboplastin time has insufficient sensitivity to edoxaban for measurement of its anticoagulant activity. Edoxaban exhibits variable effects on coagulation assays. Understanding these effects facilitates interpretation of test results in edoxaban-treated patients. More data on the relationship between drug levels, coagulation test results, and clinical outcomes in patients are needed.

Topics: Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Three factor Xa inhibitors have been studied in the treatment of venous thromboembolism, both for acute therapy and as extended therapy to prevent recurrent events. Rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban have all proven to be effective in Phase III clinical trials for this indication when compared to current standard of therapy with similar or less bleeding. Nevertheless, the agents all offer different pharmacological profiles, which have an impact on patient selection and potential advantages in clinical practice.

Topics: Animals; Blood Coagulation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Four non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban, have been evaluated in phase III clinical trials for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism, and all except edoxaban have also been studied for extended secondary prophylaxis after venous thromboembolism. Rivaroxaban, and recently also dabigatran, has been approved for this indication, and it is therefore timely to review the characteristics, efficacy, and safety of these drugs with emphasis on patients with venous thromboembolism. This review focuses on the clinical results from the phase III trials, separately for each of the drugs as compared with vitamin K antagonists. We also address the results from meta-analyses that were published recently. Finally, the results in some special groups of interest-renal impairment, elderly patients, and patients with cancer-are reviewed, although they only comprised small minorities of the study populations. All 4 drugs demonstrated noninferiority against vitamin K antagonists in the acute treatment and clear superiority against placebo in the extended treatment (not performed with edoxaban). The risk of bleeding was generally lower with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, and the reduction of risk of intracranial hemorrhage seems to mirror the experience from atrial fibrillation trials. In conclusion, during the past 30 years we have moved from a week of hospitalization and intravenous heparin therapy, via low-molecular-weight heparin injections subcutaneously and early discharge from the hospital, to the possibility of only oral outpatient therapy without coagulation monitoring, yet safe for patients with acute venous thromboembolism.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication of cancer and has a significant impact on morbidity and mortality in patients with malignancies. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) currently represent the drug of choice for both initial and long-term treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis. In recent years, however, a new class of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) inhibiting directly thrombin or activated factor X have been proposed as an alternative therapeutic option on the basis the results of subgroup analyses of phase III randomized controlled trials, including few cases of patients with cancer. After analysis of the available literature data, we conclude that although potentially interesting, future research specifically conducted in cancer patients is needed to clarify the role of these newer anticoagulant agents in prevention and treatment of cancer-related VTE.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Thiazoles; Thrombin; Venous Thromboembolism

Four new oral anticoagulants (NOAC), apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran, are now available in the USA; however, only apixaban and rivaroxaban are FDA approved for the prevention of venous thromboembolism following orthopedic surgery. Apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban's anticoagulant activity can be measured using a chromogenic anti-factor Xa assay but there is no widely available means of measuring dabigatran blood levels. None of the NOAC has an antidote. Dabigatran is 80% renally excreted, and patients with atrial fibrillation taking dabigatran for stroke prevention should stop the drug 4-5 days prior to major orthopedic surgery. Apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban should be held for 48 h preoperatively in this setting.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Humans; Orthopedic Procedures; Postoperative Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

To evaluate the current literature and potential clinical role of edoxaban (Savaysa) for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and treatment of deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.. A PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials search was conducted in February 2015 using the search terms edoxaban (ordu-176b) and atrial fibrillation, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or venous thromboembolism. Bibliographies of all retrieved articles were reviewed. All references included were published between 1998 and 2015.. All studies that included humans and contained data describing the use of edoxaban for either stroke prevention in patients with NVAF or the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) were reviewed.. Edoxaban is a target-specific oral anticoagulant, specifically a factor Xa inhibitor. It has been studied in 4 major randomized controlled trials for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with NVAF. One randomized controlled trial was conducted for the treatment of VTE. Edoxaban demonstrated noninferiority of the primary efficacy end point compared with warfarin for both approved indications. The most common adverse effect is bleeding, similar to other anticoagulants. A dosing limitation exists related to patients treated for NVAF with creatinine clearance >95 mL/min; these patients experienced decreased efficacy.. Edoxaban is a safe and effective anticoagulant to reduce the risk of stroke in patients with NVAF and for the treatment of VTE.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Interactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), manifesting as either deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, is common worldwide including in Japan. The number of patients clinically diagnosed with VTE is increasing with the majority of cases occurring out-of-hospital and of milder severity. Cancer is the largest risk factor for VTE and VTE in cancer patients confers an increased 1-year mortality rate. However, the majority of VTE cases are considered "idiopathic" or "unprovoked." The limited efficacies of unfractionated heparin and warfarin have stimulated the development of new anticoagulant therapies. Recently, parenteral and oral administration of the Xa inhibitors fondaparinux and edoxaban, respectively, was approved in Japan. These agents have the potential to provide safer and more efficacious treatment options for VTE. Although further randomized studies are required to validate the utility of these agents, they are expected to substantially improve quality of life in VTE patients. This review summarizes the current status of VTE management in Japan focusing on current epidemiology and recent advances in anticoagulant therapy.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Fondaparinux; Heparin; Humans; Japan; Polysaccharides; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Quality of Life; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Edoxaban is an oral once-daily factor Xa inhibitor with a predictable anticoagulant effect. After oral administration, edoxaban is rapidly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, reaching the peak plasma concentrations at 1-2 h. Oral bioavailability is 62% in healthy subjects and the terminal half-life is approximately 10-14 h. Edoxaban has been extensively studied in three clinical scenarios. In ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48, edoxaban was at least as effective as warfarin, but with a marked lesser risk of bleeding. In the Hokusai-VTE study, edoxaban was as effective as warfarin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or both, but with a lesser risk of bleeding. In the STARS program, edoxaban was more effective for the prevention of VTE after knee or hip arthroplasty than low-dose enoxaparin, without an increased bleeding risk. In this review, the available clinical evidence about edoxaban is updated.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

In the last few years, a new category of anticoagulants have been developed, the non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs). The NOACs are of two classes: the direct thrombin inhibitor, namely dabigatran etexilate; and the oral factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban, which have been proven to be as effective and safe (and sometimes, superior) compared to warfarin in the treatment of both atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE). One major concern about their use has always been the lack of an effective antidote or reversal strategy. The objective of this editorial is to provide an overview of the characteristics of NOAC antidotes that are in development. Moreover, we review their likely place in the management of NOAC-related bleeding episodes.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

To review current literature for target-specific oral anticoagulants (TSOACs) and provide critical analysis for dosing recommendations in special population groups.. A literature search was conducted in Medline (1996 to April week 2 2015) and Embase (1980 to 2015 week 16) using key terms dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, kidney diseases, liver diseases, elderly, obesity, and special populations.. Randomized controlled trials in English assessing efficacy and safety of TSOACs in healthy adults and special populations were selected for analysis.. Phase 3 trials for TSOACs predominately excluded patients with severe renal impairment or active liver disease. There were no exclusion criteria based on age, body weight or body mass index. Additional conclusions were made in special populations, including those with renal or liver impairment and obese and elderly patients, based on secondary analyses, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic studies.. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes associated special populations may alter clinical decision with regard to drug selection and dosing. It is valuable to understand the rationale for labeled dosing recommendations in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism treatment and prevention, particularly in patients that fall into special population groups. Furthermore, the use of TSOACs is likely to increase as clinicians gain experience with these agents and additional TSOACs and indications are approved.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Liver Diseases; Obesity; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

The treatment of pulmonary embolism is going to be deeply modified by the development of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs). There are currently three anti-Xa factors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) and one anti-IIa factor (dabigatran) labeled by the FDA and the EMA. All these drugs are direct anticoagulant, orally effective, without the need for adaptation to hemostasis test. As kidney excretion is involved for all of them, they are contra-indicated in patients with severe renal failure (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min according to Cockcroft & Gault formula). All the anti-Xa factor drugs are metabolized by liver cytochromes and then contra-indicated in case of liver insufficiency. Of note, the four DOACS have been evaluated in non-inferiority trials, including one open-label trial (the EINSTEIN program with the rivaroxaban). Moreover, two of them (rivaroxaban and apixaban) were evaluated in a single drug approach (provided initial increased doses: 15 mg bid during 21 days for rivaroxaban and 10 mg bid during 7 days for apixaban) whereas the two others (edoxaban and dabigatran) were evaluated after at least 5 days of parenteral heparin. They were found to be non-inferior to the conventional treatment, but also seem to be associated with a decreased risk of major bleeding, in a quite young and without significant comorbidities population. The risk/benefit ratio of DOACs in specific subgroups deserves prospective validations.

Topics: Antithrombins; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Edoxaban is a direct factor Xa inhibitor and has become the fourth direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) approved for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) and for treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE). This review provides an overview of the key characteristics of edoxaban and clinical evaluation program leading to regulatory approval. Approval for AF and VTE treatment was based on large phase III randomized controlled trials that showed that edoxaban reduces the risk of bleeding compared with warfarin and provides similar protection against thromboembolism. Edoxaban is the second once-daily DOAC, is tested in a reduced dose for patients with a moderate renal impairment, body weight of ≤60 kg or concomitant use of p-glycoprotein inhibitors and thereby is a valuable addition to the therapeutic arsenal of modern anticoagulation. For AF regulatory approval in the USA is limited to patients with a creatinine clearance of 15-95 ml/min. Another limitation is the need for initial parenteral anticoagulation with heparin in treatment of acute VTE.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Pulmonary embolism is a potentially life-threatening condition in which a clot can travel from the deep veins, most commonly in the leg, up to the lungs. Previously, a pulmonary embolism was treated with the anticoagulants heparin and vitamin K antagonists. Recently, however, two forms of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been developed: oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) and oral factor Xa inhibitors. The new drugs have characteristics that may be favourable over conventional treatment, including oral administration, a predictable effect, lack of frequent monitoring or re-dosing and few known drug interactions. To date, no Cochrane review has measured the effectiveness and safety of these drugs in the long-term treatment (minimum duration of three months) of pulmonary embolism.. To assess the effectiveness of oral DTIs and oral factor Xa inhibitors for the long-term treatment of pulmonary embolism.. The Cochrane Vascular Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Specialised Register (last searched January 2015) and the Cochrane Register of Studies (last searched January 2015). Clinical trials databases were also searched for details of ongoing or unpublished studies. We searched the reference lists of relevant articles retrieved by electronic searches for additional citations.. We included randomised controlled trials in which patients with a pulmonary embolism confirmed by standard imaging techniques were allocated to receive an oral DTI or an oral factor Xa inhibitor for the long-term (minimum duration three months) treatment of pulmonary embolism.. Two review authors (LR, JM) independently extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias in the trials. Any disagreements were resolved by discussion with the third author (PK). We used meta-analyses when we considered heterogeneity low. The two primary outcomes were recurrent venous thromboembolism and pulmonary embolism. Other outcomes included all-cause mortality and major bleeding. We calculated all outcomes using an odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).. We included five randomised controlled trials with a total of 7897 participants. Two studies tested oral DTIs (dabigatran) and three studies tested oral factor Xa inhibitors (one rivaroxaban, one edoxaban and one apixaban).Analysis showed no difference in the effectiveness of oral DTIs and standard anticoagulation in preventing recurrent pulmonary embolism (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.04; two studies; 1602 participants; high quality evidence), recurrent venous thromboembolism (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.66; two studies; 1602 participants; high quality evidence), deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.29 to 2.13; two studies; 1602 participants; high quality evidence) and major bleeding (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.68; two studies; 1527 participants; high quality evidence).For oral factor Xa inhibitors, when we combined the three included studies together in meta-analyses, there was significant heterogeneity for recurrent pulmonary embolism (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.46 to 2.56; two studies; 4509 participants; I(2) = 58%; moderate quality evidence). The oral factor Xa inhibitors were no more or less effective in the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.15; three studies; 6295 participants; high quality evidence), DVT (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.32; two studies; 4509 participants; high quality evidence), all-cause mortality (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.70; one study; 4817 participants; moderate quality evidence) or major bleeding (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.62; two studies; 4507 participants; high quality evidence). None of the studies measured quality of life.. Moderate to high quality evidence suggests that there are no differences between DOACs and standard anticoagulation for the long-term treatment of pulmonary embolism, for the outcomes recurrent pulmonary embolism, recurrent venous thromboembolism, DVT, all-cause mortality and major bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Edoxaban is a factor Xa inhibitor that is approved for prevention of stroke in individuals with atrial fibrillation and treatment of venous thromboembolic disease at once daily 60 mg dose for individuals with normal renal function. A decrease of dose to 30 mg is recommended for those with moderate renal insufficiency, weight ≤ 60 kg or simultaneous administration of strong P-glycoprotein inhibitors. At this time, it is not recommended for use in persons with either end stage renal disease or with GFR exceeding 95 mL/min. Shorter half-life averaging 8-10 hours may translate into a safer profile. With a fast onset of action of ~1.5 hours and relatively high bioavailability, edoxaban is an alternative for patients who may not be good candidates for warfarin therapy due to multiple limitations that vitamin K anticoagulation entails. No clear benefits of edoxaban have been reported to date compared to the other available factor Xa inhibitors.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Molecular Structure; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin and vitamin K antagonists is the current standard of care (SOC) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment and prevention. Although novel oral anti-coagulants (NOACs) have been compared with SOC in this indication, no head-to-head randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have directly compared NOACs. A systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of NOACs for the initial and long-term treatment of VTE.. Electronic databases (accessed July 2014) were systematically searched to identify RCTs evaluating apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban versus SOC. Eligible patients included adults with an objectively confirmed deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE) or both. A fixed-effect Bayesian NMA was conducted for outcomes of interest, and results were presented as relative risks (RR) and 95% credible intervals (Crl).. Six Phase III RCTs met criteria for inclusion: apixaban (one RCT; n = 5,395); rivaroxaban (two RCTs; n = 3,423/4,832); dabigatran (two RCTs; n = 2,539/2,568); edoxaban (one RCT; n = 8,240). There were no statistically significant differences between the NOACs with regard to the risk of 'VTE and VTE-related death. Apixaban treatment was associated with the most favourable safety profile of the NOACs, showing a statistically significantly reduced risk of 'major or clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleed' compared with rivaroxaban (0.47 [0.36, 0.61]), dabigatran (0.69 [0.51, 0.94]), and edoxaban (0.54 [0.41, 0.69]). Dabigatran was also associated with a significantly lower risk of 'major or CRNM bleed' compared with rivaroxaban (0.68 [0.53, 0.87]) and edoxaban (0.77 [0.60, 0.99]).. Indirect comparisons showed statistically similar reductions in the risk of 'VTE or VTE-related death for all NOACs. In contrast, reductions in 'major or CRNM bleed' for initial/long-term treatment were significantly better with apixaban compared with all other NOACs, and with dabigatran compared with rivaroxaban and edoxaban. Results from the current analysis indicate that the NOACs offer clinical benefit over conventional therapy while highlighting relative differences in their bleeding profile.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

New direct oral anticoagulants (NOACs) constitute a novel treatment option for acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), with practical advantages. Individual studies have demonstrated comparable efficacy to that of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and have suggested a more favorable safety profile . We performed a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of NOACs as compared with those of VKAs in patients with acute VTE.. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Clinical Trials Registry up to October 2013. Eligible studies included phase 3 trials comparing NOACs with VKAs in patients with acute VTE. Relative risks (RRs), absolute risk differences and numbers needed to treat (NNTs) to prevent one event were calculated for recurrent VTE, fatal pulmonary embolism (PE), overall mortality, major bleeding, and other bleeding complications, with random-effects models.. Five studies were included, investigating four NOACs (rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, and edoxaban) in 24 455 patients with acute VTE. RRs for recurrent VTE, fatal PE and overall mortality for NOACs vs. VKAs were 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-1.05), 1.02 (95% CI 0.39-5.96), and 0.97 (95% CI 0.83-1.14), respectively. The RR for major bleeding was 0.60 (95% CI 0.41-0.88). The NNT with NOACs instead of VKA to prevent one major bleed was 149. The RR and NNT for fatal bleeding were 0.36 (95% CI 0.15-0.87) and 1111. A fixed-effect network analysis did not demonstrate significant differences between individual NOACs and rivaroxaban.. NOACs have comparable efficacy to that of VKAs, and are associated with a significantly lower risk of bleeding complications, although the NNT to prevent one major bleed was relatively high.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

During the past four years the phase III trials on stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation and on treatment of venous thromboembolism have been completed for four new oral anticoagulants - dabigatran, apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban. The studies have revealed advantages in terms of a reduced risk of bleeding, most importantly of intracranial bleeding. These anticoagulants also have favourable pharmacokinetics, eliminating the need for routine laboratory monitoring and dose adjustments. There are, however, some differences between the drugs in certain subsets of patients, according to patient characteristics or to indication for treatment. These features are reviewed here. The management of patients in association with invasive procedures or major bleeding is also discussed. Finally, a strategy of how to select patients for warfarin or the new anticoagulants and thereafter possibly also among the latter is outlined.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Patient Selection; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Thromboembolic diseases will become the most important contributors to mortality and morbidity for modern societies. Current antithrombotic strategies using heparins or vitamin K antagonists are inconvenient, with limitations and inherent side effects. A series of new oral anticoagulants with powerful and reliable antithrombotic actions have been developed in the last decade.. Edoxaban is a direct and specific inhibitor of activated factor X, delivered orally. This article reviews literature from PubMed and articles referenced within. The text explores the pharmacological aspects of its antithrombotic action. Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and drug interactions are examined. The review places the results of recent clinical trials that have evaluated the antithrombotic potential of edoxaban versus standard antithrombotic therapies in the prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism into perspective. The possible relationship between the pharmacokinetic profile of edoxaban and the favorable results in clinical trials is discussed.. Edoxaban is perceived as a major advance, compared to vitamin K antagonists, in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease given its favorable efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetic profile and renal clearance. The results of ongoing large international trials exploring the prevention of thrombotic complications in patients in different clinical settings should ensure the approval of edoxaban to treat new indications.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) specifically target factor IIa or Xa and represent a major step forward in the treatment of acute- and long-term prevention of venous thrombo-embolism (VTE). They are at least as effective and as safe as conventional therapy (heparins and vitamin-K inhibitors) and have practical advantages, such as fixed dosing and no need for laboratory monitoring. These antithrombotic agents introduce a new paradigm for the day-to-day management of VTE. Direct oral anticoagulants should streamline the management of most patients with VTE and will facilitate care in the outpatient setting. Nevertheless, it remains uncertain how to select specific DOACs for particular profiles of patients, and the optimal management of bleeding complications is evolving.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Antithrombins; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Long-Term Care; Morpholines; Perioperative Care; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Perioperative pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) occurred in 2.93 per 10,000 cases and mortality of PTE was 14% in Japan according to the surveillance of Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists from 2009 to 2011. Anesthesiologists have to evaluate perioperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk carefully and take adequate measures to prevent PTE. The first step is the assessment of the preoperative probability of VTE and the next step is the assessment of the risk for VTE during and after operation. If a patient has moderate probability of VTE preoperatively, diagnostic procedures are recommended. If the d-dimer is positive, whole-leg ultrasound is recommended. If DVT is positive in proximal vein, further investigation or anticoagulant therapy are considered. Primary preventions of VTE during and after surgeries are as follows. In patients with low or moderate risks for VTE, intermittent pneumatic compression is recommended. In patients with high risks for VTE, pharmacologic prophylaxes are recommended. In recent years newly developed anticoagulants can be available other than low-dose unfractionated heparin. However, the incidence of VTE in Japanese populations is different from western countries. Moreover our own evidence has not fully been accumulated yet. Therefore further investigations for prevention of perioperative VTE in Japan are expected for our own new guidelines.

Topics: Anesthesia, Epidural; Anticoagulants; Biomarkers; Diagnostic Imaging; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Heparin; Humans; Intraoperative Complications; Perioperative Care; Postoperative Complications; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

The traditional treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been use of heparin and vitamin K antagonists (VKA), and although shown to be effective, they have numerous limitations. New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) including direct thrombin (factor IIa) inhibitors (dabigatran) and selective factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban) have emerged as promising alternatives with the potential to overcome the limitations of traditional treatments. Clinical trials have been performed with a view to making significant changes to the acute, long-term and extended treatment of VTE. Data are now available on the efficacy and safety, including bleeding rates, of the NOACs in comparison with VKA in the acute treatment and secondary prevention of VTE as well as in comparison with placebo extended VTE treatment. This review compares and contrasts the design and results of the Phase III trials of NOACs in VTE and discusses the implications of the NOACs in terms of treatment strategies in VTE patients.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Patient Acuity; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Hospitalized medical and surgical patients encompass a group of patients in whom venous thromboembolism (VTE) poses a major concern on morbidity and mortality. Recently, direct oral anticoagulants for the prevention of VTE have been developed to overcome the drawbacks of the food/drug interactions and the need for frequent laboratory monitoring and dose adjustments associated with the use of vitamin K antagonists and the inconvenience of the subcutaneous administration of low-molecular-weight heparins and fondaparinux. The novel oral anticoagulants that have been tested in major clinical trials for VTE prevention in medical and surgical patients are the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the factor Xa inhibitors apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban, which will be the focus of this review. While the new drugs proved to be highly effective and safe in the prevention of VTE following major orthopedic surgery, they failed to show a favorable benefit-to-risk profile in hospitalized medical patients receiving extended anticoagulation beyond the hospital stay.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Half-Life; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

For decades the antithrombotic management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was limited to parenteral heparin formulations and oral vitamin K antagonists. Even though both classes of anticoagulants are effective, they have several limitations, including a narrow therapeutic window and the need to monitor anticoagulant activity. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) that specifically target factor IIa or Xa have emerged. Recent data suggest that they are at least as effective and as safe as conventional therapy and have practical advantages, such as fixed dose regimen and no need for laboratory monitoring. Hence, they represent a major step forward in the acute treatment and long-term prevention of VTE. In this review, we outline the use of DOACs in the management of VTE and provide an overview of recently published major trials.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

The new oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which include dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, are poised to replace warfarin for treatment of the majority of patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). With a rapid onset of action and the capacity to be administered in fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring, NOACs streamline VTE treatment. In phase 3 trials in patients with acute symptomatic VTE, NOACs have been shown to be noninferior to conventional anticoagulant therapy for prevention of recurrence and are associated with less bleeding. Rivaroxaban and dabigatran are already licensed for VTE treatment in the United States, and apixaban and edoxaban are under regulatory consideration for this indication. As the number of approved drugs increases, clinicians will need to choose the right anticoagulant for the right VTE patient. To help with this decision, this review (1) compares the pharmacologic profiles of the NOACs, (2) outlines the unique design features of the phase 3 trials that evaluated the NOACs for VTE treatment, (3) reviews the results of these trials highlighting similarities and differences in the findings, (4) provides perspective about which VTE patients should receive conventional treatment or are candidates for NOACs, and (5) offers suggestions about how to choose among the NOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

The aim was to perform a review of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants (NOAs) in the management of venous thromboembolism (VTE).. This was a systematic review and meta-analysis. On March 26, 2014, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane trial register were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the NOAs dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in VTE treatment and secondary prevention. Two investigators assessed the methodological quality of the RCTs. The main study outcomes (efficacy, safety and net clinical benefit) were expressed as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).. Ten RCTs, mostly with low risk of bias, with nearly 38,000 patients, were identified. In six trials of treatment, NOAs were equally effective as VKAs in preventing recurrent symptomatic VTE (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.75-1.05), but major bleeding occurred less often (1.08% vs. 1.73% for VKAs, RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.51-0.77), leading net clinical benefit to favor NOAs (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.90). Fatal bleeding occurred less often with NOAs (0.09% vs. 0.18% for VKAs), a difference that approached statistical significance (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.26-1.01). In three secondary prevention trials, NOAs reduced VTE recurrence rates to 1.32% (vs. 7.24% with placebo, RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.12-0.24) and fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) (including unexplained deaths) to 0.1% (vs. 0.29% for placebo, RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.10-1.38) at the expense of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (4.3% vs. 1.8% for placebo, RR 2.32, 95% CI 1.65-3.35), but not major bleeding. All-cause mortality rate was reduced to 0.41% with NOAs (vs. 0.86% with placebo, RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18-0.79). Net clinical benefit favored NOAs (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.15-0.29), and NNT was 18.. Compared to VKAs, NOAs are not only effective in treating VTE but also safer in terms of bleeding, thereby conferring clinical benefit. Their safety and efficacy was confirmed further in secondary prevention trials.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

In the last 4 years, 6 phase 3 trials including a total of 27,023 patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). To aid the clinician in assessing the amount of information, we address frequently raised clinical questions in a review of combined trial results. We included the phase 3 trials that compared dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban with VKA therapy in patients with acute symptomatic VTE. Recurrent VTE occurred in 2.0% of DOAC recipients compared with 2.2% in VKA recipients (relative risk [RR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-1.06). Treatment with a DOAC significantly reduced the risk of major bleeding (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.83). In parallel, intracranial bleeding, fatal bleeding, and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred significantly less in DOAC recipients. The efficacy and safety of DOACs were consistent in patients with pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, a body weight ≥100 kg, moderate renal insufficiency, an age ≥75 years, and cancer. In conclusion, DOACs and VKAs have similar efficacy in the treatment of acute symptomatic VTE, a finding that is consistent in key clinical subgroups. Treatment with a DOAC significantly reduces the risks of major bleeding.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Edoxaban is a once-daily oral anticoagulant that rapidly and selectively inhibits factor Xa in a concentration-dependent manner. This review describes the extensive clinical development program of edoxaban, including phase III studies in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE). The ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 study (N = 21,105; mean CHADS2 score 2.8) compared edoxaban 60 mg once daily (high-dose regimen) and edoxaban 30 mg once daily (low-dose regimen) with dose-adjusted warfarin [international normalized ratio (INR) 2.0-3.0] and found that both regimens were non-inferior to warfarin in the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with NVAF. Both edoxaban regimens also provided significant reductions in the risk of hemorrhagic stroke, cardiovascular mortality, major bleeding and intracranial bleeding. The Hokusai-VTE study (N = 8,292) in patients with symptomatic VTE had a flexible treatment duration of 3-12 months and found that following initial heparin, edoxaban 60 mg once daily was non-inferior to dose-adjusted warfarin (INR 2.0-3.0) for the prevention of recurrent VTE, and also had a significantly lower risk of bleeding events. Both studies randomized patients at moderate-to-high risk of thromboembolic events and were further designed to simulate routine clinical practice as much as possible, with edoxaban dose reduction (halving dose) at randomisation or during the study if required, a frequently monitored and well-controlled warfarin group, a well-monitored transition period at study end and a flexible treatment duration in Hokusai-VTE. Given the phase III results obtained, once-daily edoxaban may soon be a key addition to the range of antithrombotic treatment options.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common disease associated to significant morbidity and mortality.. We systematically reviewed and meta-analysed clinical outcomes with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC: dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban or edoxaban) for treatment of acute VTE. We used MEDLINE and CENTRAL, clinical trials registers, conference proceedings, and websites of regulatory agencies to identify randomised clinical trials of DOAC compared with conventional treatment [parenteral anticoagulant followed by a vitamin K antagonist (VKA)] for acute VTE. Two investigators independently extracted data. Relative risk of recurrent VTE, bleeding events, deaths and a net clinical endpoint (composite of recurrent VTE, major bleeding, and death) were estimated using a random effect meta-analysis (RevMan software).. Six trials including 27,127 patients were selected. The risk of recurrent VTE was similar with the DOAC and standard treatment (relative risk 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 1.06). The DOAC reduced the risk of major bleeding in comparison with standard treatment (0.62, 0.45 to 0.85) (absolute risk difference, -0.6%; 95% confidence interval -1.0% to -0.3%), but there was heterogeneity across trials in the relative risk of bleeding. No between treatment differences were found in the relative risk of all-cause mortality (0.98, 0.84 to 1.14). The DOAC and conventional treatment differed on the net clinical endpoint (0.85, 0.75 to 0.97). Subgroup analyses in relevant subgroups (index pulmonary embolism, heparin lead-in, age, gender, renal function, presence of cancer), as well as sensitivity analyses, were consistent with the main analysis.. The DOAC seem as effective as, and probably safer than standard treatment of acute VTE. The relative efficacy and safety of the DOAC was consistent across a wide range of patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism and atrial fibrillation are among the most common cardiovascular disorders in the United States. For over 50 years, the standard of care has been anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists. However, the numerous limitations of vitamin K antagonists led to the development of target-specific oral anticoagulants. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban have been shown to be as effective as warfarin in the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism and prevention of stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. This article compares the basic pharmacologic properties of these anticoagulants, reviews the data supporting their use, and discusses practical clinical issues including measurement of the anticoagulation effect, reversal strategies, and management of patients prior to surgery.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Humans; Medication Adherence; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditure. In the United States, approximately 0.1 % of the population experiences an initial VTE event each year. Anticoagulation therapy is the cornerstone of acute VTE treatment and for prevention of recurrent VTE events. Conventional anticoagulants, including heparin, low-molecular-weight heparins, fondaparinux, and vitamin K antagonists are widely used but have limitations. Newer oral anticoagulant agents, including direct thrombin inhibitors (e.g., dabigatran etexilate) and direct factor Xa inhibitors (e.g., rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) have been developed to attempt to overcome some of the limitations of conventional anticoagulant therapy. These new oral agents have been evaluated for safety and efficacy in large, randomized clinical trials in the treatment and secondary prevention of VTE with results that are comparable to conventional therapy. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban are important new treatment options for patients with VTE. In this review, we compare these new agents and their associated clinical trials in VTE treatment.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have long been the standard of care for treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation (AF). Despite their efficacy, their use requires frequent monitoring and is complicated by drug-drug interactions and the need to maintain a narrow therapeutic window. Since 2009, novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), including the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the direct factor Xa inhibitors apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban, have become alternative options to VKAs owing to their predictable and safe pharmacological profiles. The overall clinical effect of these drugs, which is a balance between ischaemic benefit and bleeding harm, varies according to the clinical scenario. As adjunctive therapy to dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome, NOACs are associated with incremental bleeding risks and modest benefits. For treatment of VTE, NOACs have a safer profile than VKAs and a similar efficacy. In thromboprophylaxis in AF, NOACs are associated with the greatest benefits by reducing both ischaemic events and haemorrhagic complications and might reduce mortality compared with VKAs. The role of NOACs continues to evolve as these drugs are evaluated in different patient populations, including those with renal impairment or with AF and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Topics: Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

In recent years, the significant limitations associated with the use of vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have encouraged the development of new agents. Based upon the central roles played by the serine proteases thrombin and Factor Xa in the blood coagulation cascade, direct thrombin inhibitors and direct Factor Xa inhibitors have been developed. These agents, which include the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate and the Factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban and idrabiotaparinux are free from many of the limitations of VKAs. According to the results of available phase III randomized clinical trials, both dabigatran and rivaroxaban are effective and safe enough to qualify as ideal oral anticoagulants for the initial and long-term treatment of patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). Rivaroxaban does not require an initial parenteral treatment and can be given in once daily administrations after the first three weeks. Both of them have limitations for the treatment of patients with severe renal failure, and require further investigations in cancer patients and in pregnant patients with VTE. Both of them lack an antidote.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Benzimidazoles; Biotin; Dabigatran; Humans; Oligosaccharides; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

To review novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC) trials in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and the possible use of risk-stratification tools to guide their use in practice.. MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were searched to identify relevant journal articles published from January 1982 to February 2013. Additional references were obtained from articles extracted during the database search.. NOACs have been developed to optimize VTE management and overcome the limitations of heparin and vitamin K antagonists (VKA). The AMPLIFY and EINSTEIN trials of apixaban and rivaroxaban, respectively, investigated single-drug management of VTE, whereas the edoxaban Hokusai-VTE trial and dabigatran RE-COVER and RE-COVER II trials investigated the use of NOACs with a heparin lead-in. The AMPLIFY and Hokusai-VTE trials are ongoing but the EINSTEIN and RE-COVER trials have demonstrated that rivaroxaban and dabigatran, respectively, are non-inferior to parenteral anticoagulants and warfarin in the management of VTE. Differences in study design complicate the application of study results to clinical practice. There are multiple validated DVT protocols that effectively and safely treat patients in outpatient settings. The pulmonary embolism (PE) severity index (PESI), simplified PESI (sPESI), and other prognostic tools have been used to risk stratify patients with PE by estimating mortality risk to guide outpatient eligibility.. NOACs provide physicians with new therapeutic options in the management of VTE. While heparin and VKAs compose the current standard treatment for VTE, their use will likely disappear as physicians grow comfortable with the adoption of NOACs. As studies have not clearly defined the efficacy of these agents in certain patient populations, further data in special patient populations and risk stratification through the use of VTE severity scores could potentially be adapted to guide anticoagulant management and outpatient treatment eligibility.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Factor X; Heparin; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thrombin; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

New oral anticoagulants, acting either as direct factor-Xa or thrombin inhibitors, have been evaluated for the acute and long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Dabigatran and rivaroxaban are as effective as conventional therapy (heparin/vitamin K antagonists) without safety concerns. Rivaroxaban allows a single-drug regimen even in patients with pulmonary embolism, while dabigatran requires 5-7 days of initial heparin treatment. The results of clinical trials with apixaban and edoxaban will become available in the coming months. Rivaroxaban, apixaban and dabigatran are more effective than placebo for the extended treatment of VTE. Apixaban is effective in both therapeutic and prophylactic doses. Considering both efficacy and bleeding complications, all these agents have a favorable net clinical benefit. Dabigatran is as effective and safe as warfarin for the extended treatment of VTE. It is conceivable that the new oral anticoagulants will become the standard therapy for VTE in the next years.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Anticoagulants can complicate the approach to the management of patients undergoing operative interventions. We review new anticoagulants that have been introduced recently to the market or that are undergoing investigations for treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixiban, and edoxaban.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Loss, Surgical; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban, and the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate (dabigatran) have gained approval for use in several indications, most notably for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Hepatic impairment can affect the disposition of these anticoagulants considerably not only because of the hepatic metabolism of the direct FXa inhibitors but also because moderate to severely impaired hepatic function will affect coagulation. This review describes the key pharmacological properties of novel oral anticoagulants with special attention to patients with impaired hepatic function. In subjects with moderately impaired liver function (i.e. Child-Pugh classification B), the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of rivaroxaban (10 mg single dose) is increased by 2.27-fold, which is paralleled by an increase in FXa inhibition. The AUC of apixaban (5 mg single dose) is increased by 1.09-fold, whereas the AUC of edoxaban (15 mg single dose) is decreased by 4.8 % and the AUC of dabigatran (150 mg single dose) is decreased by 5.6 %. Specific labelling restrictions for rivaroxaban, apixaban and dabigatran regarding impaired hepatic function are based on both the Child-Pugh classification and liver-related exclusion criteria applied in pivotal clinical trials. Rivaroxaban is contraindicated in patients with hepatic disease associated with coagulopathy and clinically relevant bleeding risk, including cirrhotic patients classified as Child-Pugh B and C. Apixaban can be used with caution in patients with mild (Child-Pugh A) or moderate (Child-Pugh B) hepatic impairment or in patients with alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels >2× upper limit of normal (ULN). Apixaban is not recommended in patients with severe hepatic impairment and is contraindicated in those with hepatic disease associated with coagulopathy and clinically relevant bleeding risk. Dabigatran is not recommended in patients with elevated liver enzymes (>2× ULN). Dabigatran is contraindicated in patients with hepatic impairment or liver disease expected to have any impact on survival. Currently, edoxaban is not available in the US or European markets. However, the Japanese label did not restrict use in hepatic dysfunction but advises care in patients with severe hepatic impairment.

Topics: Absorption; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Liver Diseases; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thrombin; Tissue Distribution; Venous Thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and its long-term secondary complications are major health problems associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality and considerable costs for healthcare systems. Many patients receive suboptimal therapy, despite the availability of established and effective agents (including low molecular weight heparins, unfractionated heparin, fondaparinux and vitamin K antagonists) and evidence-based, internationally recognised guidelines. Limited knowledge of guidelines, concerns about bleeding risks and the inconvenience of parenteral administration and routine coagulation monitoring contribute to non-adherence to guidelines. Newer oral anticoagulants such as rivaroxaban, dabigatran etexilate, apixaban and edoxaban, which do not have the limitations of established anticoagulants, have been developed.. Phase III randomised controlled trials for the treatment of acute VTE or for secondary prevention of recurrent VTE were identified in the PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. The search was limited to phase III studies and performed up to 26 March 2012 with the terms 'rivaroxaban OR Xarelto', 'dabigatran OR Pradaxa', 'apixaban OR Eliquis' and 'edoxaban OR DU-176b OR Lixiana'.. A total of ten phase III studies, four published (three rivaroxaban, one dabigatran), three completed with results presented at recent congresses (dabigatran), and three ongoing (two apixaban, one edoxaban) were identified. Published and completed studies showed that rivaroxaban and dabigatran provided effective and convenient short-term treatment for deep vein thrombosis and VTE, respectively, when compared with standard of care, and showed superiority for long-term prevention of recurrent VTE when compared with placebo. Currently, rivaroxaban is the only newer anticoagulant that has been approved in Europe for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and prevention of recurrent VTE.. Based on results of completed trials, rivaroxaban and dabigatran both may reduce the incidence of secondary complications of VTE and associated socioeconomic costs. Introduction of these newer anticoagulants is likely to have a substantial impact on clinical practice.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents one of the most preventable complications that occur during hospitalization, and measurement of hospital-associated VTE is becoming a key component in hospital quality measures. Guidelines for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism have been published by several organizations to guide quality of care; however, some of the guidelines are divergent in their recommendations. This disagreement among guidelines is most pronounced in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery. The advent of newer anticoagulants, which are now approved or in late-phase development, have already had an effect on the guidelines and may also affect quality measures in the future. In this article, we review the burden of VTE in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery, highlight the differences in the guidelines, and examine the new anticoagulants as they are related to VTE prophylaxis in this patient group.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Morpholines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Societies, Medical; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

Daiichi Sankyo is developing edoxaban tosylate (DU 176b; DU-176; DU-176b; DU176b) as an orally active direct factor Xa inhibitor for the prevention of stroke and the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. Two dosing regimens of edoxaban tosylate are being compared with warfarin over 24 months in the ENGAGE AF TIMI 48 trial (NCT00781391) in over 21 000 patients with atrial fibrillation in North and South America, Africa, Asia, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. Edoxaban tosylate is also being compared with warfarin in the treatment and prevention of recurrent thromboembolic events in approximately 7500 patients with deep-vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism in the HOKUSAI VTE trial (NCT00986154) being conducted in 40 countries. This review discusses the development history and scientific profile of this new compound.

Topics: Animals; Clinical Trials as Topic; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

The optimal duration of anticoagulation therapy for isolated distal deep vein thrombosis in patients with cancer is clinically relevant, but the evidence is lacking. The prolonged anticoagulation therapy could have a potential benefit for prevention of thrombotic events; however, it could also increase the risk of bleeding.. In a multicenter, open-label, adjudicator-blinded, randomized clinical trial at 60 institutions in Japan, we randomly assigned patients with cancer with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis, in a 1-to-1 ratio, to receive either a 12-month or 3-month edoxaban treatment. The primary end point was a composite of a symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) or VTE-related death at 12 months. The major secondary end point was major bleeding at 12 months, according to the criteria of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. The primary hypothesis was that a 12-month edoxaban treatment was superior to a 3-month edoxaban treatment with respect to the primary end point.. From April 2019 through June 2022, 604 patients were randomized, and after excluding 3 patients who withdrew consent, 601 patients were included in the intention-to-treat population: 296 patients in the 12-month edoxaban group and 305 patients in the 3-month edoxaban group. The mean age was 70.8 years, 28% of the patients were men, and 20% of the patients had symptoms of deep vein thrombosis at baseline. The primary end point of a symptomatic recurrent VTE event or VTE-related death occurred in 3 of the 296 patients (1.0%) in the 12-month edoxaban group and in 22 of the 305 patients (7.2%) in the 3-month edoxaban group (odds ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03-0.44). The major secondary end point of major bleeding occurred in 28 of the 296 patients (9.5%) in the 12-month edoxaban group and in 22 of the 305 patients (7.2%) in the 3-month edoxaban group (odds ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.75-2.41). The prespecified subgroups did not affect the estimates on the primary end point.. In patients with cancer with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis, 12 months was superior to 3 months for an edoxaban treatment with respect to the composite outcome of a symptomatic recurrent VTE or VTE-related death.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03895502.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Neoplasms; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a complication of prior pulmonary thromboembolism (PE), caused by incomplete clot dissolution after PE. In patients with CTEPH, lifelong anticoagulation is mandatory to prevent recurrence of PE and secondary in situ thrombus formation. Warfarin, a vitamin K antagonist, is commonly used for anticoagulation in CTEPH based on historical experience and evidence. The anticoagulant activity of warfarin is affected by food and drug interactions, requiring regular monitoring of prothrombin time. The lability of anticoagulant effect often results in haemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications. Thus, lifelong warfarin is a handicap in terms of safety and convenience. Currently, the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in CTEPH has increased with the advent of four DOACs. The safety of DOACs is superior to warfarin, with less intracranial bleeding in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Edoxaban, the latest DOAC, also has proven efficacy and safety for those diseases in two large clinical trials; the ENGAGE-AF trial and HOKUSAI-VTE trial. The present trial seeks to evaluate whether edoxaban is non-inferior to warfarin in preventing worsening of CTEPH.. The KABUKI trial (is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, phase 3, randomised, single-blind, parallel-group, warfarin-controlled, non-inferiority trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of edoxaban versus warfarin (vitamin K Antagonist) in subjects with chronic thromBoembolic pUlmonary hypertension taking warfarin (vitamin K antagonIst) at baseline) is designed to prove the non-inferiority of edoxaban to warfarin in terms of efficacy and safety in patients with CTEPH.. This study is approved by the Institutional Review Board of each participating institution. The findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, including positive, negative and inconclusive results.. NCT04730037.. This paper was written per the study protocol V.4.0, dated 29 January 2021.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Single-Blind Method; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Children with cardiac diseases suffer from significant morbidity and mortality secondary to thromboembolic complications. Anticoagulant agents currently used for thromboprophylaxis have many limitations, including subcutaneous administration (low molecular weight heparins) and requirement for frequent monitoring via venipuncture (vitamin K antagonists). Edoxaban is an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor without need of monitoring. In the treatment of venous thromboembolism in adults, edoxaban has shown to be effective and safe.This manuscript summarises the rationale and design of a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial to evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of edoxaban against standard of care (namely, vitamin K antagonist and low molecular weight heparin) in children with cardiac diseases.A goal of 150 children with cardiac diseases at risk of thromboembolic complications who need primary or secondary anticoagulant prophylaxis will be recruited. Eligible children between 6 months and <18 years of age will be randomised in a ratio of 2 to 1 for edoxaban versus standard of care. Randomisation will be stratified based on underlying cardiac disease and concomitant use of aspirin for patients other than Kawasaki disease. The primary outcome will be safety, comprised of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding in first 3 months of treatment. Bleeding beyond 3 months, symptomatic and asymptomatic thromboembolic events, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters will be evaluated as secondary outcomes.Randomised controlled anticoagulation trials are challenging in children. This study will evaluate a potentially valuable alternative of oral anticoagulant prophylactic use in children with cardiac diseases.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Child; Heart Diseases; Humans; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

In the Hokusai VTE Cancer study, the risk of major bleeding was 2.9% higher in the edoxaban group compared with the dalteparin group, mainly due to more gastrointestinal bleedings in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. The identification of risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding may help to guide the use of DOACs in these patients.. To evaluate risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with gastrointestinal cancer receiving edoxaban.. In this nested case-control study in patients with gastrointestinal cancer randomized to edoxaban in the Hokusai VTE Cancer study, cases (patients with clinically relevant gastrointestinal bleeding during treatment) were randomly matched to three controls (patients who had no gastrointestinal bleeding). Data for the 4-week period prior to bleeding were retrospectively collected. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated in a crude conditional logistic regression model and a multivariable model adjusted for age, sex, and cancer type.. Twenty-four cases and 64 matched controls were included. In the multivariable analysis, advanced cancer, defined as regionally advanced or metastatic cancer (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.01-12.6) and low hemoglobin levels (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.5-16.0) were significantly associated with bleeding. There was no significant difference in patients with resected tumors (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.1-1.4), or in patients on chemotherapy (OR 1.3, 95% CI 0.5-3.5).. Advanced cancer and low hemoglobin levels were associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with gastrointestinal cancer receiving edoxaban. We were unable to identify other risk factors, mainly due to limited statistical power.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Case-Control Studies; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Humans; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

ETNA-VTE-Japan is an ongoing prospective observational study conducted as part of a postmarketing observational study to investigate the safety and effectiveness of edoxaban in Japanese patients for whom the drug has been newly prescribed to treat venous thromboembolism (VTE) and prevent VTE recurrence. The results of an interim analysis of data collected at 3 months are presented.Methods and Results:A total of 1,732 patients were enrolled. The safety and effectiveness analyses included data from 1,703 and 1,699 patients, respectively. In the safety analysis set, 39.4% of patients were aged ≥75 years, 58.2% had body weight ≤60 kg, and 22.2% had creatinine clearance <50 mL/min. Approximately 90% of patients received a dose in accordance with the package insert. Approximately 80% of patients continued treatment; the mean treatment period was 74.5 days. The incidence of bleeding adverse events and major bleeding was 6.3% and 1.4%, respectively. The incidence of VTE recurrence and symptomatic VTE recurrence in the on-treatment population was 0.8% and 0.4%, respectively. Safety and effectiveness profiles of edoxaban in patients receiving the low dose (30 mg/day), generally administered to patients with high bleeding risk, were similar to those of the standard dose (60 mg/day).. The results confirm no major concerns about the safety and effectiveness of edoxaban in Japanese patients with VTE in the first 3 months of treatment. (Trial registration No.: UMIN000016387.).

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Patients with active cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at high risk of recurrence. Therefore, continued anticoagulant therapy beyond the initial 6 months is suggested in this patient population, but evidence supporting this approach is limited.. The Hokusai VTE Cancer trial compared edoxaban with dalteparin for VTE treatment in patients with active cancer. This post hoc analysis focused on the follow-up period from 6 to 12 months. The primary outcome was the composite of adjudicated first recurrent VTE or major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included recurrent VTE, major bleeding, and clinically relevant bleeding.. Of the 522 and 524 patients randomized to edoxaban or dalteparin, 294 (56%) received edoxaban and 273 (52%) received dalteparin for more than 6 months (median duration of 318 and 211 days, respectively). Between 6 and 12 months, the primary outcome during study treatment occurred in seven patients (2.4%) in the edoxaban group and six patients (2.2%) in the dalteparin group (unadjusted hazard ratio 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-3.05). Recurrent VTE occurred in two patients (0.7%) in the edoxaban group and in three patients (1.1%) in the dalteparin group, whereas major bleeding occurred in 5 (1.7%) and three patients (1.1%), respectively.. The rates of recurrent VTE or major bleeding are relatively low among patients with active cancer receiving extended anticoagulant therapy beyond 6 months. Extended treatment with oral edoxaban appears as effective and safe as subcutaneous dalteparin.

Topics: Aged; Blood Coagulation; Dalteparin; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

An analysis of the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) in major orthopedic surgery patients receiving edoxaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was carried out.. The APTT waveform was analyzed in the above patients to monitor edoxaban administration.. Of these 99 patients, 12 exhibited deep vein thrombosis, and 25 had massive bleeding. An increased biphasic pattern of the APTT waveform was observed after the administration of edoxaban, but there were no significant differences between the patients with and without complications. The peak times of acceleration, velocity, and 1/2 fibrin formation were significantly prolonged after the administration of edoxaban, especially in patients with massive bleeding, and were moderately correlated with the anti-Xa activity. While the heights of velocity and acceleration peak 2 were lower in patients receiving warfarin treatment than in those receiving edoxaban, the widths of these parameters were significantly longer. The height of 1/2 fibrin formation and the width of acceleration peaks 1 and 2 and the velocity were significantly increased after the administration of edoxaban.. The peak time of the APTT waveform was significantly prolonged after the administration of edoxaban. The analysis of the APTT waveform may therefore be useful for the prediction of the risk of massive bleeding.

Topics: Aged; Drug Monitoring; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Orthopedic Procedures; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

The combination of physiotherapy and edoxaban significantly reduced the incidence of VTE after TKA compared with physiotherapy alone. However, it is possible that VTE occurrence after TKA is not only associated with thrombogenicity, but also rheological factors.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Combined Modality Therapy; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Physical Therapy Modalities; Postoperative Complications; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism

Low-molecular-weight heparin is the standard treatment for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. The role of treatment with direct oral anticoagulant agents is unclear.. In this open-label, noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned patients with cancer who had acute symptomatic or incidental venous thromboembolism to receive either low-molecular-weight heparin for at least 5 days followed by oral edoxaban at a dose of 60 mg once daily (edoxaban group) or subcutaneous dalteparin at a dose of 200 IU per kilogram of body weight once daily for 1 month followed by dalteparin at a dose of 150 IU per kilogram once daily (dalteparin group). Treatment was given for at least 6 months and up to 12 months. The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent venous thromboembolism or major bleeding during the 12 months after randomization, regardless of treatment duration.. Of the 1050 patients who underwent randomization, 1046 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. A primary-outcome event occurred in 67 of the 522 patients (12.8%) in the edoxaban group as compared with 71 of the 524 patients (13.5%) in the dalteparin group (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 1.36; P=0.006 for noninferiority; P=0.87 for superiority). Recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in 41 patients (7.9%) in the edoxaban group and in 59 patients (11.3%) in the dalteparin group (difference in risk, -3.4 percentage points; 95% CI, -7.0 to 0.2). Major bleeding occurred in 36 patients (6.9%) in the edoxaban group and in 21 patients (4.0%) in the dalteparin group (difference in risk, 2.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.1 to 5.6).. Oral edoxaban was noninferior to subcutaneous dalteparin with respect to the composite outcome of recurrent venous thromboembolism or major bleeding. The rate of recurrent venous thromboembolism was lower but the rate of major bleeding was higher with edoxaban than with dalteparin. (Funded by Daiichi Sankyo; Hokusai VTE Cancer ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02073682 .).

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Dalteparin; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Pyridines; Recurrence; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Many patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) are elderly, have multiple comorbidities and take several concomitant medications. Physicians may prefer warfarin over direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in such patients because comparative data are lacking. This analysis was designed to determine the effects of advanced age, comorbidities, and polypharmacy on the efficacy and safety of edoxaban and warfarin in patients with VTE.. Using data from the Hokusai-VTE study, we report rates of recurrent VTE and of clinically relevant bleeding by age category (<65, 65-75, and ≥75; <80 versus ≥80years), and by number of comorbidities (0, 1-2, >2) and concomitant medications (<3, 3-5, >5). Hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for edoxaban versus warfarin were determined and Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to construct time-to-event curves. At 3months, pre- and postdose levels of edoxaban were measured using mass spectrometry. For warfarin-treated patients, the time in therapeutic range was calculated. The study was approved by institutional review boards; informed consent was obtained.. Recurrent VTE increased with advanced age, multiple comorbidities, and polypharmacy in warfarin-treated patients but not with edoxaban. Edoxaban was more effective than warfarin in patients ≥75years of age and in those with multiple comorbidities. In the 517 patients over 80years of age, recurrent VTE occurred in 2.8% given edoxaban and in 5.7% given warfarin (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.21-1.24). Bleeding increased with age, comorbidity, and polypharmacy regardless of treatment, but the relative safety of edoxaban versus well-managed warfarin was maintained. Age, comorbidity, and polypharmacy did not impact edoxaban concentrations.. These data suggest that a once-daily fixed dose of edoxaban is more effective and at least as safe as warfarin in high-risk VTE patients identified by older age, more comorbidities, and polypharmacy.. NCT00986154.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Comorbidity; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Polypharmacy; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Cancer patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) have a two- to six-fold increased risk of anticoagulant-related major bleeding events compared with VTE patients without cancer. It is unknown whether major bleeding events are more severe in cancer patients than in those without cancer. Individual patient data from four randomized phase III trials that compared factor Xa inhibitors and vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of VTE were used to compare the severity of major bleeding events in patients with and without cancer. Using predefined criteria, the severity of the clinical presentation and course of major bleeding events were classified into four categories of increasing severity. A one-stage meta-analysis was used to evaluate the effect of cancer on the severity of the clinical presentation and course by estimating crude odds ratios (ORs) and ORs adjusted for age, sex and anticoagulant type with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The study group comprised 290 patients with major bleeding, of whom 50 (17%) had cancer. The clinical presentation was judged to be severe (category 3 or 4) in 38% of patients with cancer and 44% of patients without cancer (adjusted OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.47-1.72). The clinical course was found to be severe in 20 and 25% of patients with and without cancer, respectively (adjusted OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.35-1.61). The present study suggests that the clinical presentation and course of anticoagulant-related major bleeding events are not more severe in cancer patients than in patients without cancer. This may be reassuring for physicians who treat cancer patients with anticoagulant-related bleeding.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Blood Transfusion; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Odds Ratio; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

To investigate the characteristics and outcome of abnormal vaginal bleeding in women receiving edoxaban or warfarin for treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE).. Post hoc analysis of the Hokusai-VTE study, a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial comparing edoxaban with warfarin for acute symptomatic VTE.. Women below 50 years receiving edoxaban or warfarin for treatment of VTE.. We collected data on diagnostic measures, treatment, and clinical outcome of abnormal vaginal bleeding events.. Occurrence of major and clinically relevant nonmajor (CRNM) abnormal vaginal bleeding events.. In all, 628 women aged under 50 years were treated with edoxaban and 665 with warfarin. The rate of abnormal vaginal bleeding was 15/100 person-years (py) (95% CI 11-19) in women receiving edoxaban and 9/100 py (95% CI 6-12) in the warfarin group (hazard ratio: 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.5). Major abnormal vaginal bleeding occurred in eight (1.3%) women on edoxaban and in three (0.9%) women receiving warfarin [odds ratio (OR) 2.8; 95% CI 0.8-10.8], and CRNM abnormal vaginal bleeding occurred in 53 (8.4%) women treated with edoxaban and in 37 (5.6%) on warfarin therapy (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.4). Over 85% of all vaginal bleeds were characterised by heavy menstrual bleeding. Major bleeds frequently required treatment, and in more than 75% of patients anticoagulant therapy was adjusted. The severity of clinical presentation and course of major and CRNM bleeds was mild in most patients.. Abnormal vaginal bleeding occurred more frequently in women treated with edoxaban than with warfarin. Reassuringly, most events could be managed conservatively and had a mild outcome.. Abnormal vaginal bleeding occurred more frequently in women treated with edoxaban than with warfarin.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Uterine Hemorrhage; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

In the Hokusai VTE Cancer study, edoxaban was non-inferior to dalteparin for the composite outcome of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding in 1,050 patients with cancer-associated VTE. The absolute rate of recurrent VTE was 3.4% lower with edoxaban, whereas the absolute rate of major bleeding was 2.9% higher. The present analysis focuses on the sites, clinical presentation, course and outcome of bleeding events, and the associated tumour types. Major bleeds and their severity (categories 1-4) were blindly adjudicated by a committee using a priori defined criteria, and data were analysed in the safety population. Major bleeding occurred in 32 of 522 patients given edoxaban (median treatment duration, 211 days) and in 16 of 524 patients treated with dalteparin (median treatment duration, 184 days); no patients had more than one major bleed. There were no fatal bleeds with edoxaban, and two with dalteparin. Severe bleeding at presentation (category 3 or 4) occurred in 10 (1.9%) and 11 (2.1%) patients in the edoxaban and dalteparin groups, respectively. The excess of major bleeding with edoxaban was confined to patients with gastrointestinal cancer. However, severe major bleeding at presentation (category 3 or 4) in this sub-group occurred in 5 of 165 (3.0%) and in 3 of 140 (2.1%) patients given edoxaban or dalteparin, respectively.In conclusion, this analysis suggests that while oral edoxaban is an appropriate alternative to subcutaneous dalteparin for treatment of cancer-associated VTE, the use of edoxaban in patients with gastrointestinal cancer requires careful benefit-risk weighting.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Clinical Decision-Making; Dalteparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Patient Selection; Pyridines; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

This study aimed to determine the appropriate administration duration of edoxaban 15 mg (a factor Xa inhibitor) for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).. Our study comprised 202 patients who underwent TKA (excluding bilateral TKA) at our institution between 2014 and 2015. The subjects received edoxaban 15 mg daily for 1 (n = 93) or 2 (n = 109) weeks; group assignment was random. B-mode ultrasonography was performed 7 and 14 days post-TKA for the detection of DVT. We compared the incidence of DVT between the groups and examined for side effects.. The demographic data of the patients in the 1- and 2-week administration groups were similar at baseline. DVT incidence did not differ significantly between the groups at 1 week post-TKA. However, it was significantly lower in the 2-week administration group (n = 0) than in the 1-week administration group (n = 7; p = 0.004) at 2 weeks post-DVT. Neither group exhibited symptomatic DVT. A total of six patients withdrew during the study period because of hepatic dysfunction.. Our results show that the administration of edoxaban 15 mg is more effective in preventing DVT after TKA when administered for 2 weeks than for 1 week.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthritis; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

The aim of this study was to investigate whether genetic variants can identify patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) at an increased risk of bleeding with warfarin.. Hokusai-venous thromboembolism (Hokusai VTE), a randomised, multinational, double-blind, non-inferiority trial, evaluated the safety and efficacy of edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with VTE initially treated with heparin. In this subanalysis of Hokusai VTE, patients genotyped for variants in. The analysis included 47.7% (3956/8292) of the patients in Hokusai VTE. Among 1978 patients randomised to warfarin, 63.0% (1247) were normal responders, 34.1% (675) were sensitive responders and 2.8% (56) were highly sensitive responders. Compared with normal responders, sensitive and highly sensitive responders had heparin therapy discontinued earlier (p<0.001), had a decreased final weekly warfarin dose (p<0.001), spent more time overanticoagulated (p<0.001) and had an increased bleeding risk with warfarin (sensitive responders HR 1.38 [95% CI 1.11 to 1.71], p=0.0035; highly sensitive responders 1.79 [1.09 to 2.99]; p=0.0252).. In this study,. NCT00986154.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9; Double-Blind Method; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pharmacogenetics; Pharmacogenomic Variants; Phenotype; Pyridines; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K Epoxide Reductases; Warfarin

The purpose of this study was twofold: to investigate whether edoxaban significantly decreases the rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy (CWHTO), in terms of phlebographic event, and to determine whether edoxaban is safe or increases the rate of hemorrhagic complications. We hypothesized that edoxaban would decrease the incidence of VTE and would not increase the rate of hemorrhagic complications.. We randomly enrolled 60 patients undergoing CWHTO. The patients were divided into two groups: one group receiving edoxaban (15mg in 5 patients, 30mg in 23 patients) and a non-edoxaban group. All patients underwent computed tomography venography on day 7to diagnose postoperative VTE. Blood samples were obtained on the day before CWHTO and on postoperative days 1, 3, 7 and 14. The incidence of VTE and hemorrhagic events in both groups was compared using unpaired Student t-test or chi-square test.. The incidence of VTE was significantly greater in the non-edoxaban group (31.3% versus 7.1%; P=0.02). The incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was also significantly greater in the non-edoxaban group (28.1% versus 3.6%; P=0.01). A single patient from the edoxaban group experienced major bleeding. On days 3 and 7, D-dimer levels were significantly lower in the edoxaban group (P=0.03 and 0.003, respectively). On days 3, 7 and 14, activated partial thromboplastin time was significantly greater in the edoxaban group (P=0.02, 0.01 and 0.006, respectively).. Patients undergoing CWHTO are at risk of postoperative VTE. Edoxaban helps prevent asymptomatic phlebographic VTE and DVT following CWHTO; however, the risk of major bleeding must be considered.. II.

Topics: Aged; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Osteotomy; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Phlebography; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Period; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Tibia; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) facilitate the outpatient treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the pivotal trials of DOACs have not reported outcomes separately for patients managed either as outpatients or in the hospital. We performed a subgroup analysis of the Hokusai-VTE study comparing efficacy and safety of edoxaban with warfarin in 8,292 patients with acute VTE. Patients received initial therapy with open-label enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin for ≥5 days in the hospital or as an outpatient at the discretion of the treating physician. Edoxaban or warfarin was then given for 3 to 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was the cumulative incidence of symptomatic recurrent VTE at 12 months. The principal safety outcome was the incidence of clinically relevant bleeding (composite of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding). Of the 5,223 consecutively enrolled patients with recorded hospital status and length of stay, 1,414 patients (27.1%) were managed as outpatients and 3,809 were managed in hospital. Among the outpatients, initial presentation was symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) in 1,183 patients (83.7%) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in 231 patients (16.3%). Among the outpatients with DVT, recurrent VTE occurred in 18 (3.0%) given edoxaban and in 21 (3.6%) given warfarin (risk difference: −0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −2.6 to 1.4). The principal safety outcome in outpatients occurred in 46 edoxaban patients (7.7%) and in 48 warfarin patients (8.3%; risk difference: −0.59, 95% CI: −3.7 to 2.5). Most outpatients had symptomatic DVT at presentation. In these patients, initial heparin followed by edoxaban had similar efficacy and safety to standard therapy with heparin and warfarin.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Ambulatory Care; Anticoagulants; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Thiazoles; United States; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

This study aimed to investigate the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) and evaluate the efficacy and safety of edoxaban for the prevention of VTE in patients undergoing OWHTO.. A total of 139 patients with osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis undergoing OWHTO were enrolled in this prospective, randomized study. Four patients were excluded because of preoperatively diagnosed VTE, and 135 patients were divided into two groups-an edoxaban group and a non-edoxaban group-and underwent computed tomography venography on day 7 to check for postoperative VTE. Blood samples were taken on the day before OWHTO and on postoperative days 1, 3, 7, and 14.. Treatment with edoxaban reduced the incidence of VTE after OWHTO; however, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. No major bleeding was noted in the edoxaban group. There were significant differences in the D-dimer level, prothrombin time, fibrinogen level, and thrombin antithrombin complex levels between the groups.. Edoxaban is an oral, once-daily, selective, direct factor Xa inhibitor that is safe and easy to handle. It may offer a new option for preventing VTE after OWHTO.. I.

Topics: Aged; Antithrombin III; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Fibrinogen; Humans; Male; Osteotomy; Peptide Hydrolases; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Prothrombin Time; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Tibia; Venous Thromboembolism

Better understanding of risk factors for major bleeding events during anticoagulant treatment for venous thromboembolism (VTE) may help physicians when deciding on intensity and duration of treatment. The primary aim of this study was to identify risk factors for major and clinically relevant bleeding in patients receiving the oral factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban or warfarin for the treatment of acute VTE. We analysed data from 8240 patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug in the Hokusai-VTE study. Bleeding risk factors were evaluated in 4118 patients who received edoxaban and significant variables were combined in a prediction model. We used the C-statistic to estimate model discrimination and bootstrap techniques for internal validation. Major bleeding occurred in 56/4118 (1.4 %) patients given edoxaban and in 66/4122 (1.6 %) patients given warfarin. Clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 349 (8.5 %) and 423 (10.3 %), respectively. Significant risk factors for major bleeding during edoxaban treatment were female sex, concomitant antiplatelet therapy, haemoglobin ≤10 g/dl, history of arterial hypertension, and systolic blood pressure >160 mmHg. The discrimination of the model was high (C-statistic: 0.71) for major bleeding, lower for clinically relevant bleeding (C-statistic: 0.62) and when the model was applied to patients receiving warfarin (C-statistic 0.60). In conclusion, we identified five main predictors of major bleeding in patients receiving edoxaban for the treatment of acute VTE. A risk model based on these factors predicted an increased risk of bleeding with good discrimination.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Decision Support Techniques; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Pyridines; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

One of the main determinants of establishing the optimal treatment duration of patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the risk of major bleeding during long-term anticoagulant therapy. The 6-variable VTE-BLEED score was recently developed to enable estimation of this bleeding risk. This study aimed at externally validating VTE-BLEED. This was a post-hoc study of the randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, Hokusai-VTE study that compared edoxaban versus warfarin for treatment of VTE. VTE-BLEED was calculated in all 8,240 study patients. The numbers of adjudicated major bleeding events during 'stable anticoagulation', i. e. occurring after day 30, in patients with low (total score <2 points) and high risk of bleeding (total score ≥2 points) were compared for the overall study population, patients randomised to edoxaban or warfarin, and for important patient subcategories. During 'stable' anticoagulation, major bleeding occurred in 1.02 % (40/3,903) and 0.82 % (32/3,899) of patients treated with warfarin and edoxaban, respectively. For the overall study population, the risks of bleeding in the low and high risk groups were 0.51 % and 2.03 %, respectively, for an odds ratio (OR) of 4.04 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 2.51-6.48). ORs were 5.04 (95 %CI: 2.62-9.69) and 3.09 (95 %CI: 1.54-6.22) for warfarin and edoxaban, respectively. VTE-BLEED was consistently able to identify patients at a 2.5- to 11-fold higher bleeding risk across all the predefined subcategories, as well as for the treatment period between day 30 to day 180, and beyond day 180. In conclusion, patients identified as high risk by VTE-BLEED had a four-fold increased risk of bleeding during the chronic phase of treatment.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Disease Progression; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Predictive Value of Tests; Prognosis; Pyridines; Research Design; Risk; Surveys and Questionnaires; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Edoxaban is a once-daily direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). The Hokusai-VTE study revealed that, after initial treatment with heparin, edoxaban was non-inferior to and safer than vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in the prevention of recurrent deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. This is the first report on the clinical relevance and management of bleeding events with edoxaban. All major bleeding events were classified blindly by three study-independent adjudicators. Pre-defined criteria were used to classify severity of clinical presentation and, separately, the clinical course and outcome into four categories. Major bleeding occurred in 56 patients treated with edoxaban and 65 patients treated with VKA. The severest categories (3 or 4) of the clinical presentation were assigned to 46 % of the major bleeding episodes in edoxaban recipients versus 58 % of the major bleeds in VKA recipients (odds ratio [OR] 0.62, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.30-1.27, p = 0.19). Clinical course was classified as severe (category 3 or 4) in 23 % of the edoxaban and 29 % of the VKA associated bleeds (OR 0.73, 95 % CI 0.32-1.66, p = 0.46). In conclusion, edoxaban associated major bleeding events have a comparable clinical presentation and course to major bleeds with VKA in patients treated for venous thromboembolism in the Hokusai-VTE study. These results may assure physicians that it is safe to prescribe this medication. If a major bleeding during edoxaban treatment occurs, its clinical presentation and clinical course are not worse than in VKA-treated patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

There are few data on the relative efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants, such as edoxaban, compared with vitamin K antagonists during extended therapy for venous thromboembolism. This analysis evaluates the risk-benefit of extended treatment for up to 12 months with edoxaban compared with warfarin among patients enrolled in the Hokusai-VTE study who continued therapy beyond 3 months.. The Hokusai-VTE trial (NCT00986154) was a randomised, double-blind, event driven non-inferiority trial in 8292 patients comparing edoxaban with warfarin in the treatment of patients with acute venous thromboembolism. All patients were treated for at least 3 months and treatment was continued for up to 12 months. The outcomes at 12 months were documented in all patients irrespective of treatment duration. 3633 patients treated with edoxaban and 3594 treated with warfarin who completed 3 months of treatment were eligible for this analysis. The primary efficacy outcome was the incidence of adjudicated symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism evaluated for each of the time intervals of 3 months, greater than 3 months to 6 months, greater than 6 months to less than 12 months, and at 12 months, as well as the cumulative incidence occurring between 3 and 12 months. The principal safety outcome was the incidence of clinically relevant bleeding (composite of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding). Both on-treatment and intention-to-treat analyses were done.. In the on-treatment analysis, the incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism at 3 months was 1·1% (0·8-1·4; 44 of 4118 patients) in the edoxaban-treated group versus 1·2% (0·9-1·6; 51 of 4122) in the warfarin-treated group; between greater than 3 months and 6 months, 0·7% (0·3-1·5; eight of 1076) versus 0·5% (0·2-1·1; five of 1084); between greater than 6 months and less than 12 months, 0·2% (0·0-0·8; two of 896) versus 0·8% (0·03-1·7; seven of 851); and at 12 months, <0·1% (0·0-0·3; one of 1661) versus 0·1% (0·0-0·4; two of 1659). In the on-treatment analysis, the cumulative incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism between 3 and 12 months was 0·3% (95% CI 0·2-1·5; 11 of 3633 patients) in the edoxaban-treated group and 0·4% (0·2-1·7; 14 of 3594) in the warfarin-treated group (HR 0·78, 95% CI 0·36-1·72). The cumulative incidence of clinically relevant bleeding (major or non-major) between 3 and 12 months was 3·9% (95% CI 3·3-4·6; 143 of 3633 patients) in the edoxaban-treated group and 4·1% (3·5-4·8; 147 of 3594 patients) in the warfarin-treated group (HR 0·97, 95% CI 0·77-1·22); cumulative incidence of major bleeding was 0·3% (95% CI 0·2-0·5; 11 of 3633 patients) in the edoxaban-treated group and 0·7% (0·4-1·0; 24 of 3594 patients) in the warfarin-treated group (HR 0·45, 95% CI 0·22-0·92). Similar results were obtained in the intention-to-treat analysis.. Extended treatment with edoxaban is effective and associated with less major bleeding than warfarin. Edoxaban once daily provides an attractive alternative to warfarin for patients with venous thromboembolism who require extended treatment for prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism.. Daiichi Sankyo.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Secondary Prevention; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Ventricular Dysfunction, Right; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants simplify venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment by obviating the need for coagulation monitoring. Nonetheless, renal function, body weight and P-glycoprotein inhibitors influence drug levels. The objective of this analysis was to determine whether reduction in edoxaban dose based on clinical criteria avoids excess drug exposure and preserves efficacy and safety in the Hokusai-VTE study. After initial heparin, patients received edoxaban or warfarin for 3-12 months. Edoxaban was given once daily at a dose of 60 mg, which was reduced to 30 mg in patients with a creatinine clearance of 30-50 ml/minute, body weight ≤60 kg or receiving certain P-glycoprotein inhibitors. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent VTE and the principal safety outcome was major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding. A total of 8292 patients with acute VTE were randomised, 733 and 719 patients in the edoxaban and warfarin groups met the criteria for dose reduction. These patients were older, more often female or Asian and had more extensive VTE. Edoxaban levels were lower in the 30 mg edoxaban group. Rates of recurrent VTE and bleeding with the 30 mg and 60 mg edoxaban dose were comparable: VTE rates were 3.0 % and 3.2 % and clinically relevant bleeding rates were 7.9 % and 8.6 %, respectively. Rates of recurrent VTE and bleeding in the warfarin-treated patients meeting the criteria for dose reduction were 4.2 % and 12.8 %, respectively. The reduced dose edoxaban regimen maintained efficacy and safety compared with the 60 mg dose but was safer than warfarin in patients meeting the criteria for dose reduction.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Venous thromboembolism occurs commonly in patients with cancer. Direct oral anticoagulants are non-inferior to conventional anticoagulants for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. We hypothesised that edoxaban, a direct oral inhibitor of activated clotting factor Xa, might be more suitable than conventional anticoagulants in the management of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of edoxaban compared with warfarin in a subgroup of patients with cancer enrolled in the Hokusai-VTE trial.. We did a prespecified subgroup analysis in August, 2013, and a post-hoc analysis of non-inferiority and safety in March, 2016, of the patients with cancer enrolled in the randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre, Hokusai-VTE trial done between Jan 28, 2010, and Oct 31, 2012. In this study, patients aged at least 18 years with acute symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis or acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism (with or without deep-vein thrombosis) were assigned to receive edoxaban 60 mg once per day (or 30 mg once per day for patients with a creatinine clearance of 30-50 mL/min, bodyweight <60 kg, or who were receiving concomitant treatment with the P-glycoprotein inhibitors quinidine or verapamil) or warfarin (dose adjusted to maintain the international normalised ratio between 2·0 and 3·0) or placebos for either group for at least 3 months up to 12 months. All patients received initial therapy with open-label enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin for at least 5 days. Edoxoban (or placebo) was started after discontinuation of initial heparin; warfarin (or placebo) started concurrently with the study regimen of heparin. In our analysis we examined data for a subgroup of these patients who had a history of cancer or who had been categorised as having active cancer by the study physician at the time of enrolment. Additionally, all patients with a history of cancer were reviewed post hoc and categorised according to the presence or absence of active cancer. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of these patients with symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism during the 12-month study period, analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population, with an upper limit of the CI for the hazard ratio (HR) of 1·5. The principal safety outcome was the proportion of patients who had clinically relevant bleeding in the population of patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00986154.. Of 771 patients with cancer enrolled in the trial, 378 were assigned to edoxaban and 393 to warfarin. Recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in 14 (4%) of 378 patients given edoxaban and in 28 (7%) of 393 patients given warfarin (hazard ratio [HR] 0·53, 95% CI 0·28-1·00; p=0·0007). The upper limit of this 95% CI did not exceed the non-inferiority margin of 1·5 that was prespecified for the trial. Clinically relevant bleeding (major or non-major) occurred in 47 (12%) of 378 patients who received edoxaban and in 74 (19%) of 393 patients who received warfarin; HR for clinically relevant bleeding 0·64, 95% CI 0·45-0·92; p=0·017. Major bleeding occurred in ten (3%) of 378 patients with a history of cancer who received edoxaban and in 13 (3%) of 393 who received warfarin (HR 0·80, 95% CI 0·35-1·83).. Edoxaban might be as effective as warfarin for the treatment of patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism, and with less clinically relevant bleeding. Additional clinical trials of edoxaban versus low-molecular-weight heparin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer are warranted.. Daiichi Sankyo.

Topics: Aged; Double-Blind Method; Equivalence Trials as Topic; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Prognosis; Pyridines; Survival Rate; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

In patients with pulmonary embolism, right ventricular dysfunction is associated with early mortality. The Hokusai-VTE study used N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and right to left ventricular diameter ratio on CT as indicators of right ventricular dysfunction and reported that recurrent venous thromboembolism rates were lower with edoxaban than warfarin. The aim of the current study was to further explore the significance of right ventricular dysfunction and investigate potential explanations for the superiority of edoxaban-ie, differences in baseline clinical characteristics, duration of initial heparin treatment, bleeding rates, or quality of warfarin treatment.. The Hokusai-VTE trial was a randomised, double-blind, event-driven non-inferiority trial in patients from centres in 37 countries that compared edoxaban with warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. Patients received treatment for at least 3 months and up to a maximum of 12 months. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Outcome data at 12 months was collected for all patients irrespective of treatment duration. This prespecified subgroup analysis focuses on the included patients with pulmonary embolism. The primary efficacy outcome was the incidence of adjudicated symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism defined as a composite of deep vein thrombosis or non-fatal or fatal pulmonary embolism at 12 months. Recurrence rates with edoxaban and warfarin were compared in patients with and without right ventricular dysfunction. In those with NT-proBNP concentrations of 500 pg/mL or higher, we compared baseline characteristics, duration of heparin treatment, and bleeding leading to study drug discontinuation in the edoxaban and warfarin groups. We also assessed quality of warfarin treatment. All analyses were done with the modified intention-to-treat population. The Hokusai-VTE trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00986154.. Between Jan 28, 2010, and Oct 5, 2012, 8292 patients were enrolled from 439 centres, of whom 8240 received at least one dose of study drug. 3319 patients had pulmonary embolism. NT-proBNP was 500 pg/mL or higher in 465 (30%) of 1565 patients given edoxaban and in 507 (32%) of 1599 given warfarin. Recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in 14 (3%) of 465 patients in the edoxaban group and 30 (6%) of 507 in the warfarin group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·50, 95% CI 0·26-0·94; p=0·033). The right to left ventricular diameter ratio was 0·9 or higher in 414 (44%) of 937 patients in the edoxaban group and 427 (45%) of 946 in the warfarin group. Recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in 11 (3%) of 414 and 20 (5%) of 427 patients in the edoxaban and warfarin groups (HR 0·57, 95% CI 0·27-1·17; p=0·13). Baseline characteristics, duration of heparin treatment, and rates of bleeding leading to study drug discontinuation were similar in the edoxaban and warfarin groups and the quality of warfarin management was adequate for patients with NT-proBNP concentrations of 500 pg/mL or higher.. Findings from our analysis suggest that edoxaban is more effective than warfarin in the treatment and prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with pulmonary embolism and evidence of right ventricular dysfunction.. Daiichi Sankyo.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Double-Blind Method; Equivalence Trials as Topic; Europe; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Recurrence; Survival Rate; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Ventricular Dysfunction, Right; Warfarin; Young Adult

Direct oral anticoagulants have been evaluated for their efficacy and safety in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE), which comprises deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The randomized, double-blind Hokusai-VTE trial demonstrated that 60 mg of edoxaban once daily following initial heparin treatment is non-inferior to heparin overlapped with and followed by warfarin for the treatment of VTE, and is associated with significantly fewer bleeding events.. To assess the efficacy and safety of edoxaban versus warfarin among East Asian patients enrolled in the Hokusai-VTE trial.. The Hokusai-VTE trial enrolled 8292 patients from 439 centers worldwide, including 1109 patients from Japan, China, Korea, and Taiwan. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were symptomatic recurrent VTE and clinically relevant bleeding, respectively.. In the overall East Asian population, the primary efficacy outcome of symptomatic recurrent VTE occurred in 16 of 563 (2.8%) patients in the edoxaban group versus 24 of 538 (4.5%) patients in the warfarin group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-1.19; P = 0.1601). The primary safety outcome of clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 56 of 563 (9.9%) patients in the edoxaban group versus 93 of 538 (17.3%) patients in the warfarin group (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.40-0.78; P < 0.001).. Edoxaban is an effective and safer alternative to warfarin in East Asian patients with acute VTE who require anticoagulant therapy, consistent with overall study findings from the Hokusai-VTE trial.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Asia, Eastern; Asian People; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Recurrence; Therapeutic Equivalency; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Vitamin K; Warfarin; Young Adult

Edoxaban, an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, has proven antithrombotic efficacy. In a multicenter, phase II study, 264 total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients randomly received edoxaban 15 or 30 mg once daily or enoxaparin 2000IU (20-mg) twice daily for 11-14 days. Thromboembolic event incidences were 3.8% (3/78), 2.8% (2/72), and 4.1% (3/74) for edoxaban 15-mg, 30-mg, and enoxaparin, respectively (P=1.00). Edoxaban-induced prolongation of prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, and activated partial thromboplastin time were proportional to plasma edoxaban concentration. Major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding incidences were 2.2% (2/89), 1.2% (1/85), and 2.3% (2/87) for edoxaban 15-mg, 30-mg, and enoxaparin, respectively (P=1.00). Once-daily edoxaban showed similar efficacy and safety to enoxaparin for prevention of thromboembolic events in patients undergoing THA.

Topics: Aged; Antithrombins; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Double-Blind Method; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Taiwan; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

New oral anticoagulants may simplify long-term therapy by eliminating the need for laboratory monitoring. Edoxaban is an oral, direct inhibitor of factor Xa that is given in a fixed dose once daily.. The Hokusai-VTE study is a randomized, double-blind trial to evaluate whether initial low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) followed by edoxaban (60 mg once daily) is non-inferior to LMWH followed by warfarin (International Normalized Ratio of 2.0-3.0) for the prevention of recurrent thromboembolism in patients with acute symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE). The primary efficacy outcome is symptomatic recurrent VTE during the 12-month study period. The principal safety outcome is clinically relevant bleeding (major or non-major) occurring during or within 3 days of stopping study treatment. A clinical events committee adjudicates all suspected outcome events. A unique study design feature is the flexible treatment duration of between 3 and 12 months to simulate usual clinical practice, and enabled by: (i) double-blinding to minimize bias that could occur if knowledge of the patient's treatment influenced the duration of therapy; and (ii) follow-up for 12 months of all patients and inclusion in the primary efficacy analysis, regardless of the duration of therapy received. A second innovative design feature is the strategy for achieving an appropriate time in therapeutic range in the warfarin group, with central tracking for each participating center and feedback to the investigators.. The standard methods combined with innovative design features should achieve study results that are both scientifically valid and relevant to clinical practice.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Blood Coagulation Tests; Clinical Protocols; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Predictive Value of Tests; Pyridines; Research Design; Secondary Prevention; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Currently venous thromboembolic disease (VTE), i.e. deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality all around the world. The Hokusai-VTE study is a randomized, double-blind trial to evaluate whether initial heparin (5 days) followed by the oral Xa factor inhibitor edoxaban (60 mg once daily) may be an alternative to the standard therapy, i.e. heparin (5 days) followed by warfarin (INR of 2.0-3.0) for the prevention of recurrent thromboembolism in patients with acute symptomatic VTE. In patients with VTE, including pulmonary embolism with right ventricular dysfunction, treatment with heparin followed by oral edoxaban 60 mg once daily was non inferior to the standard treatment with respect to efficacy and superior with respect to bleeding (fewer fatal and intracranial bleeds, but no statistical significance regarding major bleeding). Reducing the dosage of edoxaban to 30 mg once daily is safe in case of renal impairment and low body weight.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Edoxaban is an oral direct factor (F)Xa inhibitor in advanced stages of clinical development. The primary objective of the present study was to assess the pharmacodynamics (PD) and safety of enoxaparin 1 mg/kg followed 12 hours (h) post-dose by edoxaban 60 mg, which is the regimen being used in the phase III study of edoxaban for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (Hokusai-VTE). This was a phase I, open-label, randomised, four-period, four-treatment cross-over study. Treatments were edoxaban alone (EDOX), enoxaparin alone (ENOX), edoxaban plus enoxaparin (EDOX+ENOX), and enoxaparin followed by edoxaban 12 h later (ENOX12-EDOX). Serial blood samples were collected for PD (thrombin generation, anti-FXa) and pharmacokinetic (PK) variables (edoxaban and its principal metabolite M4 by LC-MS/MS, and anti-FIIa as a surrogate of enoxaparin). The highest effect on thrombin AUC (endogenous thrombin potential, or ETP), thrombin (peak), thrombin generation lag time, and velocity index was observed for EDOX+ENOX, followed by ENOX, ENOX12-EDOX, and EDOX. The greatest effect on anti-FXa activity was observed for EDOX+ENOX, followed by ENOX12-EDOX. As expected, neither edoxaban nor enoxaparin significantly altered the PK of the other drug. There were no serious adverse events during the study. It is concluded that a 60-mg dose of edoxaban can be safely administered 12 h following enoxaparin 1 mg/kg.

Topics: Adult; Blood Coagulation Tests; Chromatography, Liquid; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Mass Spectrometry; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Thrombin; Venous Thromboembolism

Edoxaban is an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor approved for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Japan. The objectives of this analysis were to characterise the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of edoxaban and the relationships between edoxaban exposure and clinical outcomes in a phase IIb study of surgical patients following total hip replacement (THR). A total of 1,795 subjects from a phase IIb study, 10 phase I studies, and three phase IIa studies were included in the PK analysis. The exposure-response analysis included data from surgical patients assigned to edoxaban in the phase IIb study. Edoxaban disposition in healthy and post-surgical patients was well-described with a linear, two-compartment model. Creatinine clearance was significantly correlated with edoxaban clearance and the rate of oral absorption was affected by surgery. The probability of a post-operative VTE was significantly correlated with steady-state metrics of edoxaban exposure estimated for each subject by Bayesian post-hoc methods with age and gender being the significant and expected covariates. The incidence of bleeding was low in these studies and hence no exposure-response relationship could be identified. These analyses suggest that edoxaban has a predictable anticoagulant effect in this patient population leading to dose-proportional reduction in incidence of VTE with low incidence of bleeding.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Bayes Theorem; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Models, Biological; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Edoxaban is a new oral direct factor Xa inhibitor. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different doses of edoxaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing elective total hip replacement. A total of 903 patients were randomised to oral edoxaban 15, 30, 60 or 90 mg once daily or subcutaneous dalteparin once daily (initial dose 2,500 IU, subsequent doses 5,000 IU). Both drugs were begun 6-8 hours postoperatively and continued for 7-10 days, when bilateral venography was performed. The primary efficacy endpoint was the incidence of total VTE, which included proximal and/or distal deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) by venography or symptomatic, objectively confirmed DVT or pulmonary embolism during the treatment period. The primary safety outcome was the incidence of the composite of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. All venograms and bleeding events were reviewed by a central independent adjudication committee blinded as to treatment allocation. Of the 903 patients randomised, 776 were evaluable for the primary efficacy analysis. The incidences of VTE were 28.2%, 21.2%, 15.2%, and 10.6% in patients receiving edoxaban 15, 30, 60 and 90 mg, respectively, compared with 43.8% in the dalteparin group (p<0.005 ). There was a statistically significant (p<0.001) dose-response for efficacy across the edoxaban dose groups for total VTE and for major VTE. The incidence of clinically relevant bleeding was low and similar across the groups. Oral edoxaban once daily is effective for preventing VTE after total hip replacement.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Canada; Dalteparin; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Elective Surgical Procedures; Europe; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Injections, Subcutaneous; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Phlebography; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Edoxaban (the free base of DU-176b) is an oral, direct factor (F)Xa inhibitor in clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic events.. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of edoxaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study conducted in Japan. A total of 523 Japanese patients were assigned to receive edoxaban 5, 15, 30 or 60 mg once daily or placebo for 11-14 days. A placebo control was used as neither low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) nor fondaparinux had been approved for thromboprophylaxis at the time of the study in Japan. The primary efficacy outcome was the incidence of VTE (lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis, symptomatic pulmonary embolism or symptomatic deep vein thrombosis). The primary safety outcome was the incidence of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding.. Edoxaban produced a significant dose-related reduction in VTE: the incidence of VTE was 29.5%, 26.1%, 12.5% and 9.1% in the edoxaban 5-, 15-, 30- and 60-mg treatment groups vs. 48.3% in the placebo group. The incidence of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding was similar across all groups without any significant differences among edoxaban doses or between edoxaban and placebo.. Edoxaban demonstrated significant dose-dependent reductions in VTE in patients undergoing TKA with a bleeding incidence similar to placebo. [This trial is registered with JAPIC, JapicCTI-060283 (ja).].

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Middle Aged; Placebos; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

The increased risk of thrombosis and bleeding with an active tumor disease is known as the so-called "thrombo-hemorrhagic syndrome", which places high demands on anticoagulation. There are currently 4 randomized, prospective studies on the use of new, non-vitamin K dependent oral anticoagulants (NOAC) for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) that have occurred in oncology. The FXa inhibitors rivaroxaban, edoxaban and twice apixaban were each used in individual studies versus the standard therapeutic agent dalteparin. Since there is no direct head-to-head comparison of the FXa inhibitors mentioned within a study, the largest study - always compared to dalteparin - was evaluated for each NOAC. The studies were analyzed with regard to their effectiveness, safety, fatal bleeding rates, the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) and other differences using descriptive statistics. With dalteparin, the mean VTE recurrence rate was approximately 9% over a 6-month treatment period. All three FXa inhibitors were not inferior to dalteparin in terms of potency. The VTE recurrence rate was - 2.3% lower in edoxaban and apixaban-treated patients and - 5.0% in rivaroxaban-treated patients. In terms of safety, there was an increased rate of severe bleeding (both + 2.4%) for rivaroxaban and edoxaban compared to dalteparin; in particular, the number of GIBs was significantly increased. In contrast, the number of severe bleeding was not increased for apixaban, as was the case for various bleeding types including GIB. In the Apixaban study, the overall rate of severe GIB, which accounted for about 50% of all severe bleeding, and that of clinically relevant non-severe bleeding, were the lowest. The FXa inhibitors are not inferior to the standard therapy with dalteparin in the VTE recurrence rate in oncological patients. The GIB rate appears to be an important predictive factor for the safety of this group of substances, so that tumor location, gastrointestinal risk factors and other individual criteria should be given greater consideration in future therapy decisions for or against an FXa inhibitor.. Das erhöhte Thrombose- und Blutungsrisiko bei aktiver Tumorerkrankung wird als sog. „thrombo-hämorrhagisches Syndrom“ bezeichnet, welches hohe Anforderungen an die Antikoagulation stellt. Aktuell liegen 4 randomisierte, prospektive Studien zum Einsatz von neuen, nicht Vitamin K-abhängigen oralen Antikoagulantien (NOAK) zur Behandlung von in der Onkologie aufgetretenen venösen Thromboembolien (VTE) vor. Dabei wurden die FXa-Inhibitoren Rivaroxaban, Edoxaban und zweimal Apixaban jeweils in einzelnen Studien gegenüber dem Standardtherapeutikum Dalteparin eingesetzt. Da es keinen direkten Head-to-Head-Vergleich der genannten FXa-Inhibitoren innerhalb einer Studie gibt, wurde zu jedem NOAK die jeweils größte Studie – stets verglichen gegenüber Dalteparin – ausgewertet. Die Studien wurden bzgl. ihrer Wirksamkeit, Sicherheit, fataler Blutungsraten, dem Risiko für gastrointestinale Blutungen (GIB) und sonstiger Unterschiede anhand deskriptiver Statistik analysiert. Unter Dalteparin ergab sich eine mittlere VTE-Rezidivrate von ca. 9% bei einem 6-monatigen Behandlungszeitraum. Alle 3 FXa-Inhibitoren waren gegenüber Dalteparin bezüglich der Wirksamkeit nicht unterlegen. Die VTE-Rezidivrate war bei mit Edoxaban und Apixaban behandelten Patienten um – 2,3% und bei Rivaroxaban um – 5,0% niedriger.Bei der Sicherheit fanden sich – jeweils gegenüber Dalteparin – für Rivaroxaban und Edoxaban eine erhöhte Rate an schweren Blutungen (jeweils +2,4%); insbesondere war hierbei die Zahl GIB deutlich erhöht. Dagegen war für Apixaban die Zahl schwerer Blutungen, wie auch für verschiedene Blutungstypen inkl. GIB, nicht erhöht. In der Apixabanstudie war insgesamt die Rate von schweren GIB, die ca. 50% aller schweren Blutungen ausmachten, und die der klinisch-relevanten nicht schweren Blutungen, am niedrigsten. Die FXa-Inhibitoren sind der Standardtherapie mit Dalteparin in der VTE-Rezidivrate bei onkologischen Patienten nicht unterlegen. Die GIB-Rate scheint ein wichtiger prädiktiver Faktor für die Sicherheit dieser Substanzgruppe zu sein, sodass Tumorlokalisation, gastrointestinale Risikofaktoren und andere individuelle Kriterien in Zukunft stärker bei der Therapieentscheidung für oder gegen einen FXa-Inhibitor berücksichtigt werden sollten.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Dalteparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

The regimens for factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors (apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban) vary with venous thromboembolism (VTE) or non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The dosage and duration of FXa inhibitor therapy also differ. However, the distribution of anti-factor Xa activity (AXA) values, prothrombin time (PT), and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) in patients administered each FXa inhibitor has not fully been assessed. Trough and peak AXA values, PT, and APTT were measured in 85 patients taking apixaban, 105 patients taking edoxaban, and 27 patients taking rivaroxaban. The patients were further divided into three groups based on the dosage. Each FXa inhibitor showed various ranges of AXA values, and twice-daily use resulted in higher absolute AXA values than once-daily use. AXA values and PT for 20 mg apixaban at both trough and peak times were significantly higher than those for 5 mg or 10 mg. AXA values for 60 mg edoxaban at peak time were significantly higher than those for 15 mg or 30 mg. AXA values for 30 mg of rivaroxaban at both trough and peak times were significantly higher than those for 10 mg or 15 mg. In a nonlinear regression model of the relationship between AXA and PT or APTT, PT was positively correlated with AXA values for each FXa inhibitor. This study obtained trough and peak levels of AXA, PT, and APTT in patients with VTE or NVAF who were administered apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Prothrombin Time; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Edoxaban is given as pharmacologic prophylaxis alone or in combination with mechanical prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism after total knee arthroplasty. Several choices are made regarding edoxaban dosages when used in combination with mechanical prophylaxis. This study aimed to compare efficacy and safety in patients who received edoxaban with elastic stockings after total knee arthroplasty between those who received the standard dose, including those who received a reduced dose after meeting dose reduction criteria, and those who received reduced doses without dose reduction criteria.. This study included 143 patients in the standard-dose group (with 125 patients receiving dose-adjusted edoxaban 15 mg/day) and 110 patients in the low-dose group, and it compared the incidence of venous thromboembolism and bleeding events between groups. The impact of edoxaban administration on the occurrence of venous thromboembolism after total knee arthroplasty was also examined using multivariate regression analysis.. Our results showed that rates of venous thromboembolism and bleeding events in patients wearing elastic stockings after total knee arthroplasty were similar in both standard- and low-dose groups. Multivariate regression analysis showed that use of reduced-dose edoxaban without dose adjustment did not correlate with the occurrence of venous thromboembolism, but edoxaban administration was significantly associated with older age and longer surgery time (odds ratio 1.84, 95% confidence interval 1.04 - 3.25, p = 0.036; odds ratio 1.69; 95% confidence interval 1.09 - 2.62, p = 0.019).. These results suggest that reduced dose selection of edoxaban for patients who receive mechanical prophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty and post-administration pharmacological management may be useful.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Disease Progression; Humans; Neoplasms; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have established indications, according to recent guidelines for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE), including pulmonary embolism (PE), with a safer profile compared to vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in terms of a lower risk for major bleeding and no need of blood coagulation tests. However, DOACs are not indicated in the treatment of patients with triple-positive antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). This limitation is often extended in clinical practice to patients with isolated positivity. The COVID-19 pandemic has sometimes made it difficult to maintain a safe VKA treatment, due to the practical difficulties of performing INR.. We evaluated 39 patients with a previous unprovoked VTE/PE, who were no longer eligible for VKA treatment due to the difficulty of performing INR during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, in Italy. All patients had a positive LAC and refused a long-term anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin. They were shifted to edoxaban.. Any recurrence of VTE/PE occurred during the observation period (up to eight months of treatment), while only one minor bleeding event was recorded (Hazard ratio=0.06, 95% confidence interval 0.03-0.11, p=0.094). No arterial events occurred during the observation period. Hemoglobin, platelets, and creatinine were unchanged during the observation period.. Edoxaban treatment may be safe and effective in preventing the recurrence of VTE/PE in patients with isolated LAC positivity, without the occurrence of arterial events.

Topics: Adult; COVID-19; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Italy; Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor; Male; Middle Aged; Pandemics; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Quarantine; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

The incidence of thrombotic complications in SARS-CoV-2 infections has become a global concern; thus, anticoagulants are an integral part of the treatment. Edoxaban (EDX) is an oral anticoagulant suitable for pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. Herein, two novel analytical methods for EDX determination in tablets are developed and validated using capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Operating conditions such as the electrolyte's concentration and pH value, injection time, volume, and the capillary temperature, were optimized. The methods were successfully validated by establishing the linearity, intra- and inter-day precisions (relative standard deviation [%]), accuracy, and robustness. Adequate separation of excipients and degradation products of EDX generated by stress degradation conditions demonstrated the stability-indicating capability of the methods. The analytical procedures were linear in the range of 25-125 µg/ml (r > 0.999), with the limits of detection and quantification of 3.26 and 10.87 µg/ml for CZE and 0.740 and 2.78 µg/ml for HPLC. Although both methodologies are suitable for determining EDX in tablets, CZE provides a greener alternative due to low-cost analysis using less organic solvents and minimizing waste generation.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; COVID-19; Electrophoresis, Capillary; Humans; Pyridines; Reproducibility of Results; SARS-CoV-2; Tablets; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Although several studies have compared the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban and apixaban in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), direct comparison of these drugs with edoxaban is lacking.. We compared the effectiveness and safety of edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and apixaban in patients with VTE.. In this retrospective cohort study using a Japanese hospital administrative database, we identified three mutually exclusive groups of patients with VTE beginning treatment with edoxaban, rivaroxaban, or apixaban. Primary effectiveness outcome was recurrent VTE, and principal safety outcome was a composite of intracranial hemorrhage and gastrointestinal bleeding. Subjects were followed for up to 180 days. Baseline characteristics among groups were balanced using propensity score matching weights.. Three thousand three hundred sixty-nine edoxaban, 1592 rivaroxaban, and 1998 apixaban initiators were identified. There were no significant differences among the three drugs in the prevention of recurrent VTE (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-1.30 for edoxaban vs. rivaroxaban; aIRR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.54-1.56 for edoxaban vs. apixaban; and aIRR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.69-2.10 for rivaroxaban vs. apixaban), or in the risk of intracranial hemorrhage or gastrointestinal bleeding (aIRR, 1.57, 95% CI, 0.85-2.90 for edoxaban vs. rivaroxaban; aIRR, 1.30, 95% CI, 0.76-2.23 for edoxaban vs. apixaban; and aIRR, 0.83, 95% CI, 0.42-1.64 for rivaroxaban vs. apixaban).. In routine care, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and apixaban appear to have similar effectiveness and safety in the treatment of VTE.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Cohort Studies; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Edoxaban is used for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment. Real-life data are lacking about its use in long-term therapy. We aimed to assess the efficacy and the safety of edoxaban for long-term VTE treatment in a real-life setting. Patients with VTE included in the Registro Informatizado Enfermedad TromboEmbólica (RIETE) registry, receiving edoxaban 60 or 30 mg daily were prospectively followed up to validate the benefit of using different dosages. The main outcome was the composite of VTE recurrences or major bleeding in patients with or without criteria for dose reduction. Multivariable analysis to identify predictors for the composite outcome was performed. From October 2015 to November 2019, 562 patients received edoxaban for long-term therapy. Most (94%) of the 416 patients not meeting criteria for dose reduction received 60 mg daily, and 92 patients meeting criteria (63%) received 30 mg daily. During treatment, two patients developed recurrent VTE, six had major bleeding and nine died (2 from fatal bleeding). Among patients not meeting criteria for dose reduction, those receiving 30 mg daily had a higher rate of the composite event (hazard ratio (HR) 8.37; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-42.4) and a significant higher mortality rate (HR 31.1; 95% CI 4.63-262) than those receiving 60 mg. Among patients meeting criteria for dose reduction, those receiving 60 mg daily had no events, and a nonsignificantly higher mortality rate (HR 5.04; 95% CI 0.54-133) than those receiving 30 mg daily. In conclusion, edoxaban seems to be effective and safe for long-term VTE treatment in real life. Criteria for dose reduction should be reformulated.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Tapering; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Recurrence; Registries; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Venous Thromboembolism

Standard therapy for venous thromboembolism (VTE) includes the use of heparins and vitamin K antagonists. Randomized clinical trials have shown that non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants are as effective and safe as standard therapy in VTE treatment, with an improved pharmacological profile. Edoxaban, a direct inhibitor of factor Xa, has demonstrated noninferiority to standard therapy for the treatment of VTE, preserving a high safety profile even in long-term therapy, in frail patients and in severe clinical presentations. The present paper focuses on the role of edoxaban in VTE treatment, from general population to cancer patients, presenting the available data from randomized clinical trials and real world, to discuss edoxaban use in clinical practice.

Topics: Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is increased 7-fold in patients with cancer than in those without. Low-molecular-weight heparin is the standard treatment for cancer-associated VTE. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are not inferior to low-molecular-weight heparin with respect to the general outcome of recurrent VTE. Warfarin is associated with a risk of bleeding when used in combination with gefitinib or erlotinib which are epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). It is unclear, however, whether combination treatments with EGFR-TKIs and DOACs pose the same risk. We aimed to identify anticancer drugs and anticoagulants that can be used safely in combination, as accompanying research to an observational study on VTE incidence rates in lung cancer patients (Rising-VTE/NEJ037 study).. Twelve patients receiving EFGR-TKI monotherapy and VTE treatment were enrolled. Blood samples were collected in time series after the first dose of edoxaban, and further samples were collected within 8-15 days after administering EGFR-TKIs. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of edoxaban were analyzed using a non-compartmental model.. Edoxaban concentrations (30 mg once daily) were measured in eight patients. PK analyses showed no significant differences before and after co-administration of EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib).. Our findings indicate that the PK of edoxaban was not considerably affected by co-administration of EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib).

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; ErbB Receptors; Erlotinib Hydrochloride; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gefitinib; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

So far, the only available data for edoxaban periprocedural management come from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. The recently published EMIT-AF/VTE study showed low periprocedural bleeding and thromboembolic risks of edoxaban in a real-world setting in patients undergoing any diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. The aim of this study was to compare descriptively Italian and European data with regard to patient characteristics and outcomes in the EMIT-AF/VTE study.. A total of 1155 patients treated with edoxaban for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation and with venous thromboembolism, and undergoing a wide range of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures were enrolled in 326 centers across Europe. Of these patients, 246 were from 43 Italian centers. The periprocedural interruption of edoxaban was at the physician's discretion. All the procedures were classified into minor, low, and high bleeding procedural risk according to the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) definition. The primary outcome was the incidence of major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included thromboembolic events.. Patients were older in Italy in comparison with the rest of Europe with a mean age of 74.2 vs 71.3 years. Also, the rate of comorbidities was higher in Italy (e.g. diagnosed cancer and vascular disease) than in Europe. In Italy, there was a higher rate of high bleeding risk procedures than in other European countries (37.8% vs 20.6%) and a more homogeneous distribution of all types of procedures (while in Europe 44.1% were vascular access and transcatheter diagnostic procedures and interventions). In Italy, a higher proportion of patients did not interrupt edoxaban (32.9% vs 29% in Europe). The number of major bleeding events (2 in Italy, 3 in Europe) as well as of thromboembolic events (4 in Italy, 3 in Europe) was overall low.. In the EMIT-AF/VTE study, the number of bleeding and thromboembolic events in patients treated with edoxaban undergoing elective or unplanned procedures was low either in Italy or in the rest of Europe. The safety and efficacy of edoxaban was confirmed in Italy even if patients were older, presented more frequently with cancer, and there was a higher rate of high bleeding risk procedures by EHRA definition.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Italy; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

It is unclear how many patients treated with a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) are using concomitant acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, or aspirin) and how this affects clinical outcomes.. To evaluate the frequency and outcomes of prescription of concomitant ASA and DOAC therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) or venous thromboembolic disease (VTE).. This registry-based cohort study took place at 4 anticoagulation clinics in Michigan from January 2015 to December 2019. Eligible participants were adults undergoing treatment with a DOAC for AF or VTE, without a recent myocardial infarction (MI) or history of heart valve replacement, with at least 3 months of follow-up.. Use of ASA concomitant with DOAC therapy.. Rates of bleeding (any, nonmajor, major), rates of thrombosis (stroke, VTE, MI), emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and death.. Of the study cohort of 3280 patients (1673 [51.0%] men; mean [SD] age 68.2 [13.3] years), 1107 (33.8%) patients without a clear indication for ASA were being treated with DOACs and ASA. Two propensity score-matched cohorts, each with 1047 patients, were analyzed (DOAC plus ASA and DOAC only). Patients were followed up for a mean (SD) of 20.9 (19.0) months. Patients taking DOAC and ASA experienced more bleeding events compared with DOAC monotherapy (26.0 bleeds vs 31.6 bleeds per 100 patient years, P = .01). Specifically, patients undergoing combination therapy had significantly higher rates of nonmajor bleeding (26.1 bleeds vs 21.7 bleeds per 100 patient years, P = .02) compared with DOAC monotherapy. Major bleeding rates were similar between the 2 cohorts. Thrombotic event rates were also similar between the cohorts (2.5 events vs 2.3 events per 100 patient years for patients treated with DOAC and ASA compared with DOAC monotherapy, P = .80). Patients were more often hospitalized while undergoing combination therapy (9.1 vs 6.5 admissions per 100 patient years, P = .02).. Nearly one-third of patients with AF and/or VTE who were treated with a DOAC received ASA without a clear indication. Compared with DOAC monotherapy, concurrent DOAC and ASA use was associated with increased bleeding and hospitalizations but similar observed thrombosis rate. Future research should identify and deprescribe ASA for patients when the risk exceeds the anticipated benefit.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug Interactions; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

The safety and efficacy of edoxaban and dalteparin is unclear for several cancer groups.. We evaluated the occurrence of the primary outcome in large cancer groups. The primary outcome was the composite of recurrent VTE or major bleeding over 12 months.. In patients with gastrointestinal cancer, the primary outcome occurred in 19.4% patients given edoxaban and in 15.0% given dalteparin (risk difference [RD], 4.4%; 95%-CI, -4.1% to 12.8%). The corresponding rates for edoxaban and dalteparin were 10.4% and 10.7% for lung cancer (RD, -0.3%; 95%-CI, -10.0% to 9.5%), 13.6% and 12.5% for urogenital cancer (RD, 1.1; 95%-CI, -10.1-12.4), 3.1% and 11.7% for breast cancer (RD, -8.6; 95%-CI, -19.3-2.2), 8.9% and 10.9% for hematological malignancies (RD, -2.0; 95%-CI, -13.1-9.1), and 10.4% and 17.4% for gynecological cancer (RD, -7.0; 95%-CI, -19.8-5.7). In the subgroup of gastrointestinal cancer, edoxaban was associated with a 3.5% lower absolute risk of recurrent VTE and a 7.9% higher risk of major bleeding.. Edoxaban has a similar risk-benefit ratio to dalteparin in most cancer groups. In those with gastrointestinal cancer, the lower risk of recurrent VTE and the advantages of oral therapy need to be balanced against the increased risk of major bleeding.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

The anticoagulant actions of oral direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors can be inferred from their observed plasma concentrations; however, the steady-state pharmacokinetics (PK) of different FXa inhibitors have not been compared in clinically.. The sensitivity of the rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban in the STA-Liquid Anti-FXa assay were compared, and the anti-FXa plasma concentrations were measured for PK assessments. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was used to assess population PK in 329 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism. Patients were followed up for an average of 3.6 years.. Sensitivity was similar among the three drugs in this assay, which could directly compare plasma concentrations instead of anti-FXa activities. Overall exposure was greatest in 5 mg BID apixaban relative to other drugs (p < 0.001). The geometric mean AUC for the 0 to 24-h interval was 4550 ng h/mL for apixaban, 2710 ng h/mL for 15 mg QD rivaroxaban, and 1290 ng h/mL for 60 mg QD edoxaban. The PKs of 2.5 mg BID apixaban or 15 mg QD rivaroxaban were associated with hemorrhagic events.. Apixaban was associated with greater exposure, higher trough concentrations in plasma compared with rivaroxaban or edoxaban. Furthermore, a higher plasma concentration may partially predict hemorrhagic events.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation Tests; Chromatography, Liquid; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

For some years now, direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have entered the clinical practice for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) or for prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, there is uncertainty on DOACs' use in some clinical scenarios that are not fully explored by clinical trials, but commonly encountered in the real world. We report a Delphi Consensus on DOAC use in VTE patients. The consensus dealt with seven main topics: (1) clinical superiority of DOACs compared to VKAs; (2) therapeutic options for patients with intermediate risk PE; (3) therapeutic management of patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT); (4) DOACs' role in oncological patients with VTE; (5) role of the reversal agent; (6) safety of low doses of DOACs in VTE patients; (7) DOACs long-term therapy (more than 12 months) in VTE patients; Forty-six physicians (cardiologists, internists, angiologists, oncologists, hematologists, and geriatricians) from Italy expressed their level of agreement on each statement by using a five-point Likert scale (1: strongly disagree, 2: disagree, 3: somewhat agree, 4: agree, 5: strongly agree). Votes 1-2 were considered as disagreement, while votes 3-5 as agreement. For each statement an agreement of ≥ 66% among the respondents was considered consensus. A brief discussion about the results for each topic is also reported.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Delphi Technique; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The safety and efficacy of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) have been established in randomized controlled trials, but limited data are available on their use in clinical practice across geographical regions.. In the international RE-COVERY DVT/PE observational study (enrollment January 2016 to May 2017), we sought to characterize the patient population and describe the prescribed anticoagulant. Patient characteristics and anticoagulants administered after objective diagnosis of VTE were recorded at the baseline visit and again at hospital discharge or at 14 days after the diagnosis, whichever was later.. A total of 6095 patients were included, 50.2% were male, and the mean age was 61.5 years. The most common comorbidities were hypertension (35%), diabetes mellitus (11%), cancer (11%), prior VTE(11%), and trauma/surgery (7%). Overall, 77% of patients received oral anticoagulants, with 54% on NOACs and 23% on vitamin K antagonists (VKAs); 20% received parenteral anticoagulation only. NOACs comprised about 60% of anticoagulant treatment in Europe and Asia but substantially less in Latin America (29%) and the Middle East (21%). For NOAC therapies, the distribution (as a percentage of the total cohort) was rivaroxaban 25.6%, dabigatran 15.5%, apixaban 11.3%, and edoxaban 1.7%. Treatment with NOACs was less frequent in patients who had cancer, chronic renal disease, heart failure, or stroke.. These findings enhance our understanding of baseline characteristics and the initial management of patients with VTE in routine practice.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Age Distribution; Aged; Anticoagulants; Asia; Comorbidity; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dabigatran; Diabetes Mellitus; Europe; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fondaparinux; Heparin; Humans; Hypertension; Latin America; Male; Middle Aged; Middle East; Neoplasms; Postoperative Complications; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Wounds and Injuries

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) may recur during anticoagulation, but the actual rate is not well established. In a post hoc analysis of the Hokusai-VTE trial we evaluated the risk and determinants of recurrent VTE of patients during anticoagulation with heparin, edoxaban or warfarin.. The Hokusai-VTE study showed that in VTE patients edoxaban was non-inferior to warfarin with significantly less bleeding. Treatment duration ranged from 3 to 12 months. The recurrent VTE during anticoagulation period was defined as the VTE which occurred from the date of the first to the last dose (+3 days) of study drug.. 147 of 8240 patients (1.8%) had a recurrent VTE during anticoagulant treatment. Median duration of anticoagulation was 267 days. 80 (54%) patients recurred within the first 30 days, 39 of those during heparin lead-in. 23 of 147 patients died of pulmonary embolism (PE) during anticoagulation (case fatality rate 15.6%). 13 of those fatalities (57%) occurred during the first 30 days; 4 of those during heparin lead-in. The recurrence risk was numerically lower in patients assigned to edoxaban compared to those assigned to warfarin, particularly beyond 30 days. We observed a trend towards a higher proportion of men, high NT-proBNP levels and obesity at the time of diagnosis among patients with early recurrence and mortality in particular.. The risk of recurrent VTE and PE-related mortality during the time of anticoagulation is low but noteworthy. Further studies are warranted to sharpen the risk profile of VTE patients in order to improve treatment and reduce mortality.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Adult; Ambulatory Care; Bed Rest; COVID-19; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Edoxaban has proven its efficacy and safety in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 and HOKUSAI-VTE clinical trials. Clinical practice patients, however, may differ from those enolled in clinical trials. We aimed to compare patients from the HOKUSAI-VTE clinical trial with those treated in clinical practice.. ETNA-VTE-Europe is a prospective, non-interventional post-authorisation safety study conducted in eight European countries.. A total of 2,879 patients presenting with acute symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) were enrolled at 339 sites. Of the 2,680 patients with complete data, 23.6% reported prior VTE and 2.8% had a history of bleeding. Patients in ETNA-VTE were older (65vs.57 years), more likely to be female (46.5vs.39.8%) and had a higher prevalence of chronic venous insufficiency (11.1vs.1.6%) than those in the European cohort of the HOKUSAI-VTE trial (n=1,512). Bodyweight and creatinine clearance were substantially lower in clinical practice. Edoxaban dosing was adherent to label in 90% of patients, with higher (60 mg) and lower than recommended doses (30 mg) used in 6.6% and 3.3% of the patients, respectively. Heparin lead-in was used in 84.7% of the patients overall, and was more frequently used in patients with PE than patients with DVT only (91.3% vs. 80.1%; p<0.0001).. These data reinforce the largely appropriate use of edoxaban in routine clinical practice, where the study population differs from those in prior randomised controlled trials. CLINICALTRIALS.. NCT02943993.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Europe; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Edoxaban had a positive risk-benefit ratio for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared to conventional therapy with warfarin. The objective of this analysis of the ongoing ETNA-VTE Europe study was to assess the real-world benefits and risks of edoxaban during the first 3 months of treatment, the highest risk period for further VTE events.. ETNA-VTE Europe is a prospective, non-interventional, post-authorization study, conducted in eight European countries. Participants had initial or recurrent acute VTE (deep vein thrombosis [DVT] and/or pulmonary embolism [PE]) that occurred ≤2 weeks prior to enrolment and received edoxaban therapy.. The analysis set included 2672 patients (PE ± DVT, n = 1117; DVT only, n = 1555); mean age 62.9 ± 16.0 years, bodyweight 81.9 ± 17.4 kg, estimated glomerular filtration rate 95.4 ± 42.8 mL/min; 46.4% were female. Overall, 66.4% of patients (PE ± DVT, 68.5%; DVT-only, 64.8%) received heparin lead-in treatment for at least 5 days. Most patients (87.7%) received edoxaban at a dose of 60 mg once daily. Event rates at 3 months were: recurrent VTE 0.34% (n = 9), major bleeding 0.97% (n = 26), all-cause mortality 0.79% (n = 21). Rates were numerically higher in the PE ± DVT group compared with the DVT-only group (recurrent VTE, 0.45% (n = 5) versus 0.26% (n = 4); major bleeding, 1.34% (n = 15) versus 0.71% (n = 11); and all-cause mortality 1.16% (n = 13) versus 0.51% (n = 8)).. The results support the safety and effectiveness of edoxaban in a general VTE population during the most critical time period, the first 3 months. The outcomes of this study extend the principal efficacy and safety data on edoxaban into the routine clinical practice setting.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Europe; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Risk Assessment; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Randomized controlled trials showed the nonvitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) edoxaban was effective and safe for stroke and systemic embolism prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE; including pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis). Additional research is needed to evaluate the effects of edoxaban in routine clinical practice. Therefore, the Edoxaban Treatment in routine cliNical prActice (ETNA) program is being conducted to provide routine clinical care data on characteristics and outcomes in patients with AF or VTE receiving edoxaban.. The Global ETNA program integrates prospectively collected data from edoxaban patients in regional ETNA noninterventional studies across Europe, Japan, and East and Southeast Asia into indication-specific databases for AF and VTE. Targeted enrollment is >31 000 patients (AF >26 000; VTE >4500), with a follow-up of 2 years for AF and 1 year for VTE. Data integration will be possible using consistent terminology, parameter definitions, and data collection across the regional noninterventional studies. Safety and effectiveness data will be assessed. Crude rates of outcomes including bleeding and thromboembolic events will be reported.. Globally, enrollment began in early 2015 and is ongoing.. Global ETNA will generate the largest integrated prospective repository of routine clinical care data for a single NOAC in patients with AF or VTE. It will provide important information on the safety of edoxaban in routine clinical care and gather further information on its effectiveness.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Databases, Factual; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

A woman in her 70s developed deep vein thromboembolism(DVT)and pulmonary embolism(PE)during chemotherapy for advanced transverse colon cancer. After the first treatment with heparin and warfarin, the anticoagulant was changed to edoxaban to reduce the risk of bleeding. She continued receiving chemotherapy for 4 years. We recommend edoxaban as the first choice of anticoagulant for patients with DVT and PE requiring chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine-based antineoplastic agents.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Colonic Neoplasms; Fluorouracil; Humans; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Anticoagulants; Female; Humans; Male; Prothrombin Time; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; United Kingdom; Venous Thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a multifactorial disease. Cancer and older age are risk factors for both recurrent VTE and bleeding under anticoagulant therapy. Oral direct factor Xa inhibitors (Xa inhibitors) have been widely used to treat VTE. However, their effectiveness and safety in cancer and elderly patients have not been fully elucidated. A total of 187 consecutive patients who started Xa inhibitors for VTE therapy between September 2014 and September 2016 were recruited. Patients' demographics, changes in VTE amount, VTE recurrence, clinically relevant bleeding, and death until February 2017 were compared between 92 cancer and 95 non-cancer patients, and 57 elderly (≥ 75 years) and 130 non-elderly patients. Compared with non-cancer patients, cancer patients had a significantly higher incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the proximal legs, superior vena cava, and upper extremities (p = 0.034), although the patients' demographics and incidence of pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) were similar between the two groups. There were no significant differences in VTE recurrence (p = 0.328) and clinically relevant bleeding (p = 0.078) between the two groups. Death occurred in 29 cancer patients, 23 of whom died of cancer, while there were no deaths among the non-cancer patients. Elderly patients had a lower body weight and creatinine clearance than non-elderly patients. No significant differences between the two groups were found in relation to PE (p = 0.544), DVT site (p = 0.054), recurrent VTE (p = 0.194), clinically relevant bleeding (p = 0.130) and death (p = 0.241). In comparisons among the four groups (elderly and non-elderly patients with and without cancer), recurrent VTE and clinically relevant bleeding were comparable (p = 0.493 and 0.227, respectively), while death was more frequent in cancer patients regardless of age (p < 0.001). The efficacy and safety of Xa inhibitors as VTE treatment were comparable between cancer and non-cancer patients, and in elderly and non-elderly patients. This suggests that Xa inhibitors may be promising drugs for VTE treatment, irrespective of age and comorbid cancer.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Japan; Lower Extremity; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are safe and efficacious when compared to warfarin for patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, bleeding is a major side effect of anticoagulant therapy in VTE patients. Discontinuation of the DOACs associated to adverse events such as bleeding. The HAS-BLED score predicts warfarin-associated hemorrhage. However, little is known about risk factors for DOAC-associated minor bleeding in VTE patients. We aimed to identify risk factors for minor bleeding in VTE patients that were treated with edoxaban, rivaroxaban, or apixaban. We retrospectively evaluated the data of 212 VTE patients who received treatment with a DOAC. The study endpoint was defined as the occurrence of minor bleeding. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine risk factors that were significantly associated with minor bleeding. A total of 36 (17.0%) patients experienced minor bleeding, with rates of 15.7%, 0%, and 21.3% for edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, bleeding history or predisposition [odds ratio (OR) 6.083, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.131-17.364, p=0.001] and cancer (OR 6.397, 95% CI 2.858-14.317, p<0.001) were significantly associated with minor bleeding. Bleeding history or predisposition and cancer were the most important risk factors for DOAC-induced minor bleeding in VTE patients in this study. To continue anticoagulant therapy of the DOACs, further management systems by minor bleeding risk factors for patients with VTE will be required.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Cohort Studies; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

The efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the treatment and prophylaxis of cancer-related venous thromboembolism (VTE) is reportedly similar to that of heparin. However, the effect of DOACs on the prophylaxis of cancer-related arterial thromboembolism (ATE) remains unclear. To our knowledge, we present the 1st case where cerebral ATE was encountered during edoxaban administration for VTE in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma.. In March 2017, a 63-year-old female was diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma (cT2aN3M1b stage IVa) along with having asymptomatic VTE; thus, 60 mg/day edoxaban administration was initiated. In addition, 1st-line chemotherapy generated a partial antitumoral response. However, owing to lung cancer progression, a secondary treatment with pembrolizumab administration was initiated. The patient suddenly experienced aphasia 11 days after pembrolizumab administration.. The patient was diagnosed as multiple cerebral ATE using brain magnetic resonance imaging. However, VTE recurrence was not observed. Based on the findings of lung cancer progression and increased coagulation, cerebral ATE was diagnosed as Trousseau syndrome.. DOAC administration was switched to heparin administration.. Coagulation profile normalized and aphasia improved without any further disease symptoms.. We considered that DOACs are effective for the treatment and prophylaxis of VTE but may be insufficient for ATE prevention. Therefore, DOACs should be replaced with heparin to prevent ATE when cancer and coagulation become uncontrollable with DOAC.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease Progression; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Heparin; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Lung Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

A direct oral anticoagulant, edoxaban, is as effective as vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the mechanism underlying the treatment effect on VTE remains to be determined. The aims of this study were to evaluate the effect of edoxaban on tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA)-induced clot lysis in human plasma and to determine the roles of plasmin and thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) in the profibrinolytic effect by edoxaban. Pooled human normal plasma or TAFI-deficient plasma (containing 180 ng/mL t-PA and 0.1 nM thrombomodulin) was mixed with edoxaban or an activated TAFI inhibitor, potato tuber carboxypeptidase inhibitor (PCI). Clot was induced by adding tissue factor and phospholipids. Clot lysis time and plasma plasmin-α2 antiplasmin complex (PAP) concentration were determined. Clot structure was imaged with a scanning electron microscope. In normal plasma, edoxaban at clinically relevant concentrations (75, 150, and 300 ng/mL) and PCI significantly shortened clot lysis time. PCI increased PAP concentration and a correlation between PAP concentration and percent of clot lysis was observed. Edoxaban also dose-dependently elevated PAP concentration. In TAFI-deficient plasma, the effects of edoxaban and PCI on clot lysis and PAP concentration were markedly diminished as compared with normal plasma. Fibrin fibers were thinner in clots formed in the presence of edoxaban. In conclusion, edoxaban at clinically relevant concentrations accelerates t-PA-induced fibrinolysis via increasing plasmin generation in human plasma. The effects of edoxaban is mainly dependent on TAFI. The profibrinolytic effect of edoxaban might contribute to the efficacy for the treatment of VTE.

Topics: alpha-2-Antiplasmin; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Carboxypeptidase B2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fibrin Clot Lysis Time; Fibrinolysin; Fibrinolysis; Humans; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Tissue Plasminogen Activator; Venous Thromboembolism

Protein S (PS) deficiency is an inherited thrombophilia associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). In Japan, unfractionated heparin followed by warfarin has been historically applied for the treatment of VTE. Recent evidence showed that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were non-inferior to standard therapy with warfarin, with significantly less bleeding in patients with VTE. However, it is unknown whether DOACs are effective for the treatment of VTE in patients with thrombophilia, including protein S deficiency, due to lack of evidence. Here, we report a case of recurrent venous thrombosis during edoxaban therapy in a patient with protein S deficiency, which was successfully treated using high-dose apixaban therapy. J.Med. Invest. 66 : 182-184, February, 2019.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Humans; Male; Protein S Deficiency; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recurrence; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dalteparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Neoplasms; Pyridines; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Secondary Prevention; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is one of the main complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In this study, oral administration of 15 mg edoxaban (a factor Xa inhibitor) once daily for 14 days efficiently prevented the incidence of DVT. Our hypothesis was that prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR) on the third postoperative day could predict the incidence of DVT following TKA.. In this study, 286 subjects were enrolled and divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of DVT. Several variables [age, body mass index, postoperative D-dimer level, PT-INR, and functional recovery findings (standing)] were analysed to determine the predictors of DVT, and for DVT diagnosis, ultrasonography was performed for seven days after surgery.. The PT-INR levels were significantly higher in the group that did not develop DVT (p = 0.01). Further analysis with logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve was performed. The PT-INR on the third postoperative day was an independent factor of the incidence of DVT (odds ratio 0.210; p = 0.035). The cut-off PT-INR was calculated to be 1.425.. PT-INR level is a useful marker in determining whether 15 mg edoxaban administration can prevent DVT after TKA. It is suggested that increment of edoxaban to control PT-INR over the cut-off point might prevent the incidence of DVT.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Biomarkers; Early Ambulation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Period; Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis; Prospective Studies; Prothrombin Time; Pyridines; ROC Curve; Thiazoles; Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

To evaluate the use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants in patients with cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE) treated at Ochsner Medical Center with the intent of determining the efficacy and safety of these agents.. Patients were identified by a retrospective data extraction of patients treated at Ochsner Medical Center from January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2015. Patients were included for review if they were ≥18 years of age, with a confirmed diagnosis of VTE and active or history of cancer, and if they received dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, or edoxaban for at least 6 months. The primary objectives were the rate of recurrence of VTE and the incidence of bleeding at 6 months.. Thirty-seven patients were identified. Twelve patients were diagnosed with PE, 21 with DVT, 3 with DVT and PE, and 1 with DVT and superficial vein thrombosis (SVT). Apixaban was used most often (n = 27). No patients experienced a recurrent DVT or PE at 6 months. Two patients experienced adverse effects during treatment.. In this single-center, retrospective, observational study in patients with cancer receiving DOAC therapy, there were no episodes of recurrent VTE and only 2 episodes of clinically significant bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

It is well known that warfarin inhibits the synthesis of vitamin K-dependent anticoagulants, including thrombin, protein C and S, and factor Xa, leading, paradoxically, to an initial hypercoagulable state. Edoxaban, a direct inhibitor of activated factor X is widely used for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the effect of edoxaban on circulating coagulation factors, in patients with acute VTE, remains unknown.. We enrolled 57 patients with acute VTE with/without pulmonary embolism treated with edoxaban (n=37) or warfarin (n=20) in a clinical setting. Before treatment and 2 weeks after treatment, we evaluated thrombotic burden using ultrasound or computed tomography angiography. We also evaluated thrombin generation, represented by prothrombin fragment F1+2; thrombus degradation, represented by D-dimer; and levels of anticoagulants, including protein C, protein S, and antithrombin III. Both edoxaban and warfarin treatment improved thrombotic burden and decreased prothrombin fragment F1+2, and D-dimer. Edoxaban treatment preserved protein C and protein S levels. In contrast, warfarin decreased protein C and protein S levels. Neither treatment affected antithrombin III.. Edoxaban improves VTE while preserving protein C and protein S levels, thereby indicating that edoxaban improves thrombotic burden while maintaining levels of anticoagulants.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombin III; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Protein C; Protein S; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

This report describes the case of a 66-year-old man with non-small cell lung cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Unfractionated heparin (UFH) was initially used to control VTE before chemotherapy. However, switching UFH to warfarin or edoxaban, a novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC), failed. Chemotherapy was then administered to control the tumor which was thought to have been the main cause of VTE, which had been treated by UFH. After tumor shrinkage was achieved by chemotherapy, we were able to successfully switch from UFH to edoxaban. Controlling the tumor size and activity enabled the use of edoxaban as maintenance therapy for VTE.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Heparin; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Tumor Burden; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Neoplasms; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

This study was conducted to describe the real-world hospital length of stay in patients treated with all of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin for new-onset venous thromboembolism (VTE) at a large, tertiary, academic medical center. A retrospective cohort analysis of all adult patients diagnosed with acute onset VTE was conducted. Of the 441 patients included, 261 (57%) patients received DOACs versus 180 (41%) patients received warfarin. In the DOAC group, a total of 92 (35%) patients received rivaroxaban, followed by 83 (32%) patients received apixaban, 50 (19%) patients received dabigatran, and 36 (14%) patients received edoxaban. Patients initiated on DOACs had a statistically significant shorter hospital length of stay compared to patients initiated on warfarin (median 3 days, [IQR 0-5] vs. 8 days [IQR 5-11], P < 0.05). Despite the shorter hospital length of stay in patients receiving DOACs, the overall reported differences between the DOACs group and the warfarin group in terms of recurrent VTE, major bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and gastrointestinal bleeding at 3 and 6 months were deemed to be statistically insignificant.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent and serious complication of cancer. The current guidelines in the USA and Europe recommend low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE. In Japan, LMWH is not given for the treatment of VTE; instead edoxaban, an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, was approved for the treatment of VTE in September 2014. However, the efficacy and safety of the factor Xa inhibitor in cancer patients have not been fully elucidated.. Patients' charts were reviewed retrospectively, and 125 VTE patients (61 cancer patients) in whom edoxaban therapy was started between September 2014 and September 2016 were included in this study. Patients' demographics, changes in VTE amount, VTE recurrence, clinically relevant bleeding, and outcomes until February 2017 were examined.. Patients' characteristics, including age, sex, weight, creatinine clearance, and duration of administration of edoxaban were comparable between cancer and non-cancer patients. No parenteral anticoagulant pretreatment before edoxaban was given in 37.5% and 55.7% of non-cancer and cancer patients, respectively. The incidence of pulmonary embolism was also similar in the two groups. The amount of thrombosis decreased ("improved") or disappeared ("normalized") in 89.6% and 94.1%, respectively, of non-cancer and cancer patients who underwent at least two imaging tests. The frequencies of recurrence of VTE and clinically relevant bleeding were not significantly different between the two groups (p=0.414 and 0.516, respectively). However, 21 cancer patients died, 17 of whom died of cancer, while none of the non-cancer patients died.. The present study showed that the efficacy and safety of edoxaban for the treatment of VTE is comparable between cancer and non-cancer patients. Edoxaban may be a clinically useful therapy for VTE in Japanese cancer patients.

Topics: Aged; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Postoperative anemia is a common complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the effect of edoxaban on postoperative anemia after THA remains unclear. Here, we retrospectively evaluated the clinical assessment of postoperative anemia and the associated changes of coagulation parameters in patients undergoing thromboprophylaxis with edoxaban compared with fondaparinux as a conventional anticoagulant thromboprophylactic agent after THA.. One hundred and forty-nine patients who underwent THA from July 2010 to June 2012 were divided into two groups, according to whether they were operated on before or after the approval of edoxaban: the fondaparinux group (Group F: 86 patients) and the edoxaban group (Group E: 63 patients). The frequency of postoperative anemia and blood coagulation values were investigated.. Postoperative anemia developed more frequently in Group E than in Group F after surgery. However, the degree of postoperative anemia showed no significant difference between the groups. Meanwhile, prothrombin time (PT), prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR), and activated partial thromboplastin time were markedly higher in patients with edoxaban-associated postoperative anemia, which showed an increased potential to predict the occurrence of postoperative anemia. Additionally, both PT and PT-INR in Group E were also correlated with the volume of estimated blood loss.. The frequency of postoperative anemia was increased in patients treated with edoxaban, compared to fondaparinux, after THA. Edoxaban thromboprophylaxis might, therefore, require more careful monitoring to prevent postoperative anemia. Additionally, particular prolongation of PT and PT-INR induced by edoxaban treatment might predict postoperative anemia.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anemia; Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Blood Coagulation Tests; Chemoprevention; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fondaparinux; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Female; Humans; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Uterine Hemorrhage; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Neoplasms; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Humans; Neoplasms; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Humans; Neoplasms; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Humans; Neoplasms; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Humans; Neoplasms; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Dabigatran; Dalteparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Neoplasms; Observational Studies as Topic; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Oral anticoagulants used for the primary treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) include warfarin and the more recently introduced direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran and edoxaban. Information on the comparative safety of these medications in routine clinical practice is lacking. We identified patients with diagnoses for VTE and prescriptions for oral anticoagulants using claims data from a large U.S. insurance database from 2012 to 2017. Marginal structural logistic models were used to examine associations between type of oral anticoagulant and risk of all-cause mortality. Of 62,431 enrolees in this analysis, 51% were female and the mean age was 61.9 years. Initial oral anticoagulant prescriptions were for warfarin (

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Survival Analysis; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Most clinical practice guidelines recommend low molecular weight heparin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients. In the Hokusai VTE Cancer study, 1050 patients with cancer and acute VTE were randomized to oral edoxaban or subcutaneous dalteparin for at least 6 months and up to 12 months. Edoxaban was non-inferior to dalteparin with respect to the composite outcome of recurrent VTE and major bleeding. The rate of recurrent VTE was numerically lower, but the rate of major bleeding was significantly higher with edoxaban. The frequency of severe major bleeding was similar with edoxaban and dalteparin. The difference in major bleeding was mainly driven by a higher rate of upper gastrointestinal bleeding with edoxaban, especially in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. The pilot Select-D study randomized 406 patients with cancer and VTE to rivaroxaban or dalteparin for 6 months. Recurrent VTE was reduced, while both major and clinically relevant non major bleeding were significantly increased with rivaroxaban. Bleeding mostly involved the gastrointestinal tract and occurred in patients with gastroesophageal cancer. While waiting for ongoing studies on direct oral anticoagulants, the results of the Hokusai VTE Cancer suggest that edoxaban may represent a valuable alternative to low molecular weight heparin for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE. In patients with gastrointestinal cancer, the use of edoxaban requires careful benefit-risk weighting, taking into consideration patient's preferences.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Dalteparin; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Neoplasms; Perioperative Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Topics: Antithrombins; Dabigatran; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Review Literature as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Vitamin K

In the Hokusai-VTE trial, 733 patients were treated with the reduced dose edoxaban regimen, which maintained efficacy and safety compared with the 60 mg dose, and was safer than warfarin. The prophylactic doses of apixaban and rivaroxaban reduced the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the extended treatment trials. Dabigatran 110 mg was approved by the European Medicine Agency for VTE treatment. Further data from registries and real-world studies will help to clarify whether patients, with other specific characteristics, can benefit from the reduced dose of direct oral anticoagulants.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The international guidelines recommend the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over vitamin K antagonists for anticoagulation long-term therapy in patients diagnosed with venous thromboembolism (VTE), and for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Efficacy and safety of DOACS have been extensively evaluated in large phase III trials. According to the product label, dose reductions of DOACs are recommended for patients with AF and renal impairment, low body weight and concomitant use of interfering medications. Except for Edoxaban, dose reductions of DOACs are not recommended in patients with VTE based on the same indications for AF patients. The aim of this article is to discuss the indication of a lower DOAC dose in some patients with VTE. Observational studies and randomized control trials (RCTs) show that patients with AF are usually older, more often have chronic diseases, and more often are treated with several concomitant medications, potentially increasing their haemorrhagic risk. Furthermore, many VTE patients need a shorter period of anticoagulation therapy than AF patients. In real-life studies, VTE patients treated with inappropriate DOAC doses present a higher rate of VTE recurrence, and the same risk of bleeding compared to those treated with the correct dose. In light of this evidence, the use of lower DOAC dose in patients with VTE does not appear reasonable and may be potentially dangerous.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) can be quantified using methods that can be performed in any clinical or research laboratory using manual or automated instrument platforms. Dabigatran etexilate, the oral direct thrombin inhibitor, can be quantified by drug-calibrated clot or chromogenic-based assays using either thrombin or ecarin as substrates. Oral direct anti-Xa inhibitors, such as rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, can be quantified with drug-calibrated anti-Xa kits or reagents as typically used for measuring heparins (unfractionated, low molecular weight, or pentasaccharides).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antithrombins; Blood Coagulation; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Endopeptidases; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thrombin Time; Venous Thromboembolism

The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are drugs used in clinical practice since 2009 for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, and for the treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism. The four DOACs, including the three factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban) and one direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran) provide oral anticoagulation therapy alternatives to Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Despite their clear advantages, the DOACs require on the part of the internist a thorough knowledge of their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics to ensure their correct use, laboratory monitoring and the appropriate management of adverse events. This document represents a consensus paper on the use of DOACs by representatives of three Italian scientific societies: the Italian Society of Internal Medicine (SIMI), the Federation of the Associations of Hospital Managers (FADOI), and the Society for the Study of Haemostasis and Thrombosis (SISET). This document formulates expert opinion guidance for pragmatic managing, monitoring and reversing the anticoagulant effect of DOACs in both chronic and emergency settings. This practical guidance may help the internist to create adequate protocols for patients hospitalized ion internal medicine wards, where patients are often elderly subjects affected by poly-morbidities and renal insufficiency, and, thus, require particular attention to drug-drug interactions and peri-procedural protocols.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Competence; Consensus; Dabigatran; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Food-Drug Interactions; Humans; Internal Medicine; Italy; Liver Diseases; Perioperative Period; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Anticoagulants; Humans; Pyridines; Secondary Prevention; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

We report a case of venous thromboembolism during the cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. A 49-year-old woman who was undergone left lower lobectomy for the lung cancer received adjuvant chemotherapy of cisplatin + vinorelbine ditartrate regimen. On day 11 after starting the chemotherapy, she presented a left lower leg pain and readmitted. Computed tomography revealed a deep venous thrombosis of the left lower leg and peripheral pulmonary embolism. The symptom and thromboembolism were successfully treated by anticoagulant drug and thrombolytic therapy. Although cisplatin-based chemotherapy is a risk factor of venous thromboembolism in patients with advanced malignancy, it should be also recognized as a complication of the adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Cisplatin; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Echocardiography; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Fondaparinux; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Polysaccharides; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Thrombolytic Therapy; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome; Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Anticoagulants; Double-Blind Method; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Humans; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Ventricular Dysfunction, Right

Observational data and results from post-hoc analyses in clinical trials suggest that direct oral factor Xa inhibitors might increase menstrual bleeding intensity in women of reproductive age, but the extent of this effect is unknown. We aimed to investigate the management and outcomes of vaginal bleeding complications during therapy with direct oral factor Xa inhibitors in a case series of women of reproductive age.. To identify individuals for inclusion in this case series, we searched two sources of prospectively collected data from women of reproductive age treated with direct oral factor Xa inhibitors: the non-interventional Dresden NOAC Registry (NCT01588119), which is based in the administrative district of Dresden (Saxony, Germany), and all locally archived data from phase 3 trials of direct oral factor Xa inhibitors done at University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden. Vaginal bleeding events were defined as any vaginal bleeding complications as reported by the patient. We collected data on type and dosage of anticoagulation; suspected or confirmed bleeding events, hospital admissions, and mortality; and pattern and management of vaginal bleeding events. For all cases of bleeding identified, we reviewed all available source data to identify examination results suggesting potential underlying anatomical causes of bleeding.. We identified 178 women of reproductive age who received direct oral factor Xa inhibitor therapy, of whom 57 had vaginal bleeding events, including 50 who received rivaroxaban, six who received apixaban, and one who received edoxaban. These 57 women had 72 vaginal bleeding events, including 59 cases of heavy menstrual bleeding and 13 bleeding events unrelated to the menstrual cycle. 51 (86%) of these heavy menstrual bleeding events (two major bleeding events, 17 clinically relevant non-major bleeding events, 32 minor bleeding events) were treated conservatively (eg, change of oral hormone therapy or reduction, temporary interruption, or discontinuation of direct oral factor Xa inhibitor) and the remaining eight (14%) events (three major bleeding events and five clinically relevant non-major bleeding events) required elective surgical or interventional treatment (hysterectomy, curettage, ovary excision, or excision of ovarian cysts). Of the 57 women, 13 (23%) had a second bleeding event and two (4%) had a third event. Nine patients had underlying anatomical abnormalities; compared with patients without abnormalities, these patients had more intense bleeding, more had recurrent bleeding (five [56%] of nine patients with abnormalities vs eight [17%] of 48 patients without abnormalities), and more needed surgical treatment for bleeding (eight [89%] of nine vs zero of 48).. Vaginal bleeding, particularly heavy menstrual bleeding, is a common complication in women of reproductive age on direct oral factor Xa inhibitor therapy. Most cases can be treated conservatively, but patients with severe or recurrent vaginal bleeding complications should be assessed for underlying anatomical abnormalities, which might require surgical or interventional treatment. Further data are needed to provide guidance on prevention and treatment of vaginal bleeding complications in this patient population.. None.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hormone Replacement Therapy; Humans; Menorrhagia; Middle Aged; Progesterone; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Uterine Hemorrhage; Venous Thromboembolism

Medical costs that may be avoided when any of the four new oral anticoagulants (NOACs), dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, are used instead of warfarin for the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) were estimated and compared. Additionally, the overall differences in medical costs were estimated for NVAF and venous thromboembolism (VTE) patient populations combined.. Medical cost differences associated with NOAC use vs warfarin or placebo among NVAF and VTE patients were estimated based on clinical event rates obtained from the published trial data. The clinical event rates were calculated as the percentage of patients with each of the clinical events during the trial periods. Univariate and multivariate sensitivity analyses were conducted for the medical-cost differences determined for NVAF patients. A hypothetical health plan population of 1 million members was used to estimate and compare the combined medical-cost differences of the NVAF and VTE populations and were projected in the years 2015-2018.. In a year, the medical-cost differences associated with NOAC use instead of warfarin were estimated at -$204, -$140, -$495, and -$340 per patient for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, respectively. In 2014, among the hypothetical population, the medical-cost differences were -$3.7, -$4.2, -$11.5, and -$6.6 million for NVAF and acute VTE patients treated with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, respectively. In 2014, for the combined NVAF, acute VTE, and extended VTE patient populations, medical-cost differences were -$10.0, -$10.9, -$21.0, and -$21.0 million for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, 2.5 mg apixaban, and 5 mg apixaban, respectively. Medical-cost differences associated with use of NOACs were projected to steadily increase from 2014 to 2018.. Medical costs are reduced when NOACs are used instead of warfarin/placebo for the treatment of NVAF or VTE, with apixaban being associated with the greatest reduction in medical costs.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Costs and Cost Analysis; Dabigatran; Health Expenditures; Hemorrhage; Humans; Models, Econometric; Myocardial Infarction; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; United States; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Patients with cancer account for 20 % of cases of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Cancer patients are at increased risk for VTE during the entire course of their disease, also in absence of traditional VTE risk factors. Furthermore, patients with VTE and cancer have an estimated risk of bleeding of 15-20 % per year while on anticoagulant treatment. For these reasons, treatment of acute VTE in patients with cancer remains a clinical challenge. In clinical studies, which included about 27,000 patients, new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been shown to be as effective and safe as conventional anticoagulation (heparin given with and followed by vitamin K antagonists) for the treatment of VTE. In these studies, 1227 patients with active cancer were enrolled. Preliminary results of subgroup analyses and meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials suggest that NOACs could represent an alternative to conventional anticoagulation in patients with active cancer. Further "ad hoc" studies evaluating the clinical benefit of treatment with NOACs in patients with VTE and cancer are needed.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Approval; Embolism; Humans; Pyridines; Recurrence; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Stroke and venous thromboembolism (VTE) affect millions of patients. The vitamin K antagonist, warfarin, has been the main oral anticoagulant used to treat these conditions despite many limitations associated with its use. Recently, multiple novel oral anticoagulants have been approved and are reshaping how patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at risk of stroke and patients with VTE are treated. The direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran etexilate , is among these novel agents that have been developed to overcome limitations with warfarin.. In this article, authors describe the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of dabigatran etexilate and summarize the clinical evidence and controversy surrounding its use in the US, Canada and Europe.. Dabigatran has demonstrated similar efficacy and safety to enoxaparin for VTE prevention in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty, and to warfarin for the treatment of VTE. Dabigatran (110 mg) is noninferior and dabigatran (150 mg) is superior to warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular AF, with a lower rate of intracranial hemorrhage reported at both doses. Apixaban, rivaroxaban and edoxaban provide alternate anticoagulant options to dabigatran. While there are many similarities, there are also significant differences to consider in agent selection based on patient-specific characteristics.

Topics: Antithrombins; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Enoxaparin; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Two multiple myeloma (MM) patients developed venous thromboembolism (VTE) while being treated with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone. Aspirin is recommended for VTE prophylaxis when using lenalidomide/dexamethasone for MM patients with a standard risk of VTE. Despite aspirin administration, however, these two patients experienced VTE. Following VTE development, warfarin and then a Factor Xa inhibitor, edoxaban, were administered. The edoxaban treatment, especially, resulted in favorable and effective control of VTE. Considering these observations, Factor Xa inhibitors may in future become a preferred option for prevention and treatment of VTE when managing MM patients.

Topics: Aged; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Lenalidomide; Multiple Myeloma; Pyridines; Thalidomide; Thiazoles; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Venous Thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is increasingly diagnosed in pediatric patients, and anticoagulant use in this population has become common, despite the absence of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for this indication. Guidelines for the use of anticoagulants in pediatrics are largely extrapolated from large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults, smaller dose-finding and observational studies in children, and expert opinion. The recently FDA-approved direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, provide potential advantages over oral vitamin K antagonists and subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs). However, key questions arise regarding their potential off-label clinical application in pediatric thromboembolic disease. In this Perspective, we provide background on the use of LMWHs such as enoxaparin as the mainstay of treatment of pediatric provoked VTE; identify key questions and challenges with regard to DOAC trials and future DOAC therapy in pediatric VTE; and discuss applicable lessons learned from the recent pilot/feasibility phase of a large multicenter RCT of anticoagulant duration in pediatric VTE. The challenges and lessons learned present opportunities to improve evidence for anticoagulant therapies in pediatric VTE through future clinical trials.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Anticoagulants; Child; Child, Preschool; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Disease Management; Evidence-Based Medicine; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Infant; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is associated with almost 300,000 deaths per year in the United States. Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) offer an alternative to warfarin-based therapy without monitoring requirements and with fewer drug and food interactions. Edoxaban, a direct Xa inhibitor, is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), based upon results of the Hokusai-VTE Phase 3 trial. The trial demonstrated that edoxaban administered once daily after initial treatment with heparin was non-inferior in reducing the risk of VTE recurrence and caused significantly less major and clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding compared to warfarin. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of edoxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of adults with VTE.. A cost-effectiveness model was developed using patient-level data from the Hokusai-VTE trial, clinical event costs from real-world databases, and drug acquisition costs for warfarin of $0.36 and edoxaban of $9.24 per tablet.. From a U.S. health-care delivery system perspective, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $22,057 per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that edoxaban had an ICER <$50,000 per QALY gained relative to warfarin in 67% of model simulations. The result was robust to variation in key model parameters including the cost and disutility of warfarin monitoring.. Despite its higher drug acquisition cost, edoxaban is a cost-effective alternative to warfarin for the treatment of VTE.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are at high risk of venous thromboembolism, manifesting as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of edoxaban 15 mg once daily (o.d.) for preventing DVT in patients undergoing TKA.. Three hundred patients undergoing primary TKA under general anaesthesia for osteoarthritis were enrolled in this study: 100 treated with enoxaparin 2,000 IU twice daily (b.i.d.), 100 treated with fondaparinux 1.5 mg o.d. and 100 treated with edoxaban 15 mg o.d.. All treatments were scheduled to continue for 14 days.. The incidence of DVT in patients treated with edoxaban 15 mg o.d. was lower than in patients with enoxaparin 2,000 IU b.i.d. and fondaparinux 1.5 mg o.d.. D-dimer levels were significantly lower in patients with edoxaban than in patients with enoxaparin and fondaparinux 1.5 mg o.d. on the first postoperative day; ΔHb levels were lower in patients with edoxaban than in patients with enoxaparin and fondaparinux on postoperative days, However, the difference was not statistically significant. Finally, the incidence of hepatic dysfunction was lower in patients with edoxaban than in patients with enoxaparin and fondaparinux.. Edoxaban 15 mg o.d. was more efficient than enoxaparin 2,000 IU b.i.d. and fondaparinux 1.5 mg o.d.. Furthermore, edoxaban was safe compared with enoxaparin and fondaparinux. Edoxaban, an orally administered direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor, may offer a new option for preventing DVT, with a level of evidence III.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Enoxaparin; Female; Fondaparinux; Humans; Incidence; Knee Joint; Male; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Polysaccharides; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Topics: Acute Disease; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Drug Approval; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

This study evaluated differences in medical costs associated with clinical end-points from randomized clinical trials that compared the new oral anticoagulants (NOACs), dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, to standard therapy for treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE).. Event rates of efficacy and safety end-points from the clinical trials (RE-COVER, RE-COVER II, EINSTEIN-Pooled, AMPLIFY, Hokusai-VTE trial) were obtained from published literature. Incremental annual medical costs among patients with clinical events from a US payer perspective were obtained from the literature or healthcare claims databases and inflation adjusted to 2013 costs. Differences in total medical costs associated with clinical end-points for the NOACs vs standard therapy were then estimated. One-way and Monte Carlo sensitivity analyses were carried out.. A lower rate of major bleedings was associated with use of any of the NOACs vs standard therapy. Except for dabigatran, use of NOACs was also associated with a lower rate of recurrent VTE/death. As a result of the reduction in clinical event rates, the overall medical cost differences were -$146, -$482, -$918, and -$344 for VTE patients treated with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, respectively, vs patients treated with standard therapy.. When any of the four NOACs are used instead of standard therapy for acute VTE, treatment medical costs are reduced. Apixaban is associated with the greatest reduction in medical costs, which is driven by medical cost reductions associated with both efficacy and safety end-points. Further evaluation may be needed to validate these results in the real-world setting.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Fees, Pharmaceutical; Health Expenditures; Hemorrhage; Humans; Models, Econometric; Monte Carlo Method; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

Edoxaban is an oral, once-daily, selective, direct factor Xa inhibitor approved in Japan for the prevention of venous thromboembolism following major orthopedic surgery. Currently, edoxaban is in Phase III clinical development for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation, and for the treatment and prevention of recurrences of venous thromboembolism. This report describes the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) spontaneously reported during early postmarketing phase vigilance from the time of its commercial launch in Japan.. All spontaneously reported ADRs following edoxaban use received by Daiichi Sankyo during early postmarketing phase vigilance from July 19, 2011, to January 18, 2012, were entered into the safety database and included in this review. Approximately 20,000 patients were estimated to have been treated with edoxaban.. The mean age of patients was 74.2 years, their mean weight was 59.4 kg, and approximately 70% were female. A total of 67 ADRs were reported in 56 patients, of which the majority included bleeding events (51 ADRs in 42 patients). Of these, 15 ADRs (in 14 patients) were serious, including cerebral hemorrhage (n = 1), gastric hemorrhage (n = 2; gastric hemorrhage [n = 1] and gastric ulcer hemorrhage [n = 1]), and surgical-site hemorrhage (n = 12; hemorrhage [n = 6], subcutaneous hemorrhage [n = 3], wound hemorrhage [n = 2], and wound hematoma [n = 1]). Most ADRs occurred within the first week of treatment and there were no fatalities. Nonserious ADRs associated with bleeding that occurred in >1 patient included subcutaneous hemorrhage (n = 9), wound hemorrhage (n = 5), postprocedural hematoma (n = 4), anemia (n = 4), and hemarthrosis (n = 3). Other nonserious ADRs not associated with bleeding and occurring in >1 patient included abnormal hepatic function (n = 4) and diarrhea (n = 2).. Safety data from the first 6 months of postmarketing experience with edoxaban did not identify any unforeseen safety signals, consistent with the known safety profile of edoxaban.

Topics: Adult; Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Aged; Anticoagulants; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Orthopedic Procedures; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Although currently available anticoagulants are effective for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders, they have several drawbacks. Low molecular weight heparin and fondaparinux produce a predictable level of anticoagulation that obviates the need for coagulation monitoring, but they must be given parenterally, which renders them inconvenient for long-term use. Vitamin K antagonists, such as warfarin, are administered orally, but produce a variable anticoagulant response because genetic polymorphisms, dietary vitamin K intake and multiple drug-drug interactions affect their metabolism. Consequently, coagulation monitoring and frequent dose adjustments are needed to ensure that a therapeutic level of anticoagulation is achieved. This is burdensome for patients and physicians, and costly for the healthcare system. These limitations have prompted the development of new oral anticoagulants that target thrombin or factor Xa. The new agents produce such a predictable anticoagulant response that they can be given in fixed doses without monitoring. This paper focuses on the new oral anticoagulants in the most advanced stages of development.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Drug Discovery; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thrombin; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Clinical data on the risk factors, incidence, consequences and current treatment options of venous thromboembolism are reviewed. Current guidelines advise anticoagulant treatment for a few weeks or months in immobilized patients treated in hospital, and after major surgery. The initial treatment is based on heparin, followed by vitamin K antagonist treatment. Recently a number of new, partially orally administered medications have undergone clinical investigations and based on the results three of them were also registered for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. Direct thrombin inhibitors, direct and indirect Factor Xa inhibitors exhibited proven non-inferiority or superiority compared with traditional treatment options. The superior efficacy or non-inferiority was not accompanied with an increase in the bleeding risk. Results of the most important clinical trials are reviewed. Based on these results, prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism will change substantially in the near future.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Drug Costs; Drugs, Investigational; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Hungary; Morpholines; Oligosaccharides; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thrombin; Venous Thromboembolism

Vitamin K antagonists have been the cornerstone of oral antithrombotic therapy to help prevent ischemic stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF) and reduce venous thromboembolic events. Despite proven clinical benefit, vitamin K antagonists have several limitations, including a narrow therapeutic window, slow onset/offset of action, need for close monitoring and significant drug/food interactions, highlighting the need for alternative therapies. Recently, the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran was approved by the US FDA for use in AF, and several factor Xa inhibitors are in late-stage clinical testing. Edoxaban is a novel, oral, reversible, direct factor Xa inhibitor with rapid absorption and predictable dose-dependent anticoagulation effects. Early clinical studies have shown promising results and it is currently undergoing large-scale Phase III trials for stroke prevention in AF and venous thromboembolic event prophylaxis and treatment. This review provides an overview of the current understanding, clinical trial results and pharmacology of edoxaban.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism