edoxaban and Thromboembolism

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a high prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF). Stroke in patients with CKD and AF is frequent, and is usually more severe than in the absence of CKD. Current European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend oral anticoagulant therapy in order to reduce thromboembolic risk in AF patients in general, and also in the presence of CKD, excluding however stage 4 and dialysis (stage 5) patients. Warfarin and other vitamin K antagonists are still the most frequently used drugs in these settings, despite the high bleeding risk. In the United States, the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, especially apixaban, are here used off-label, despite the absence of strong evidences of efficacy and safety. Several clinical trials are ongoing, and further evidence is needed before non-vitamin K antagonists can be recommended in these patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Diabetes Complications; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Off-Label Use; Prevalence; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Sex Factors; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism

Edoxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, is the latest of the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Despite being marketed later than other NOACs, its use is now spreading in current clinical practice, being indicated for both thromboprophylaxis in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE). In patients with multiple conditions, the contemporary administration of several drugs can cause relevant drug-drug interactions (DDIs), which can affect drugs' pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Usually, all the NOACs are considered to have significantly fewer DDIs than vitamin K antagonists; notwithstanding, this is actually not true, all of them are affected by DDIs with drugs that can influence the activity (induction or inhibition) of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and cytochrome P450 3A4, both responsible for the disposition and metabolism of NOACs to a different extent. In this review/expert opinion, we focused on an extensive report of edoxaban DDIs. All the relevant drugs categories have been examined to report on significant DDIs, discussing the impact on edoxaban pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and the evidence for dose adjustment. Our analysis found that, despite a restrained number of interactions, some strong inhibitors/inducers of P-gp and drug-metabolising enzymes can affect edoxaban concentration, just as it happens with other NOACs, implying the need for a dose adjustment. However, our analysis of edoxaban DDIs suggests that given the small propensity for interactions of this agent, its use represents an acceptable clinical decision. Still, DDIs can be significant in certain clinical situations and a careful evaluation is always needed when prescribing NOACs.

Topics: ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Drug Interactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Medication Therapy Management; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism

Edoxaban is the last direct oral anticoagulant marketed for the prevention of stroke among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Areas covered: ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 was the pivotal clinical trial that led to the approval of edoxaban 60 mg once daily. After the publication of this study, a great number of substudies and post hoc analyses have been published, together with some observational studies. The aim of this review was to update the current evidence about the use of edoxaban in AF patients. Expert opinion: In the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, edoxaban 60 mg was noninferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism, but significantly reduced the risk of bleeding, major adverse cardiac events and death from cardiovascular causes. The relative efficacy and safety of edoxaban 60 mg compared with warfarin were independent of different clinical conditions, such as prior stroke, age, risk of falls, renal function, hepatic disease, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, valvular heart disease, or cancer. Data about the effectiveness and safety of edoxaban in real-life patients are scarce, but consistent with those of the pivotal clinical trial. Edoxaban seems a cost-effective alternative to warfarin among AF patients with moderate to high thromboembolic risk.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation Factors; Blood Coagulation Tests; Colonoscopy; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Premedication; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism

The Multimorbid Patient: Use of New Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Abstract. Increasing life expectancy in Western countries is associated with a high prevalence of multiple chronic diseases which is defined by the term "multimorbidity". Many of these patients suffer from chronic kidney disease (CKD) and thrombogenic comorbidities such as atrial fibrillation with the need for oral anticoagulation. For decades vitamin K antagonists have been exclusively prescribed for oral anticoagulation. However, due to altered pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of these drugs in CKD, a significant risk of bleeding exists. The introduction of direct oral anticoagulants as a new and promising alternative to vitamin K antagonists was -especially for CKD patients - highly anticipated. However, data from randomized studies are missing for older patients with advanced CKD. Consequently, a careful evaluation of the risk-benefit ratio is recommended for this sensitive patient population.. Zusammenfassung. Die zunehmende Lebenserwartung in den westlichen Ländern führt zu einer gleichzeitigen Zunahme chronischer Krankheiten, was mit «Multimorbidität» bezeichnet wird. Viele dieser Patienten leiden an chronischer Niereninsuffizienz (CKD) sowie thrombogenen Komorbiditäten wie z.B. Vorhofflimmern, weshalb eine orale Antikoagulation indiziert ist. Für lange Zeit standen lediglich die Vitamin-K-Antagonisten zur Verfügung. Aufgrund der unter anderem veränderten Pharmakokinetik sowie Bioverfügbarkeit dieser Medikamente bei CKD besteht jedoch gleichzeitig ein deutlich erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko. Die Einführung der direkten oralen Antikoagulanzien als neue und vielversprechende Alternative zu Vitamin-K-Antagonisten wurde daher insbesondere für die Population der CKD-Patienten mit grosser Spannung erwartet. Aufgrund der noch nicht ausreichenden Datenlage insbesondere bei älteren Patienten mit fortgeschrittener Niereninsuffizienz sollte das Risiko-Nutzen-Verhältnis vor Therapiebeginn sorgfältig evaluiert werden.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arterial Occlusive Diseases; Atrial Fibrillation; Comorbidity; Contraindications; Coronary Disease; Dabigatran; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) have an elevated incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and are at increased risk for thromboembolic events. However, these patients are also at increased risk for bleeding and it is unclear whether they benefit from an oral anticoagulant. Point prevalent on July 1, 2015, only ~28% of dialysis patients with AF were on oral anticoagulation. Warfarin was the most commonly used oral anticoagulant, followed by apixaban, while dabigatran and rivaroxaban were rarely used. This article reviews the current evidence regarding each oral anticoagulant especially as they relate to patients with ESKD.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Dialysis; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Electric Countershock; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Time Factors

New oral anticoagulants (NOACs: dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban) proved to be at least non-inferior to warfarin in reducing thromboembolic risk in patients with atrial fibrillation. In addition, NOACs have been demonstrated to be safe and associated with a significant reduction in major and intracranial bleeding events. With the exception of apixaban, an increase in gastrointestinal bleedings has been observed, but as a whole NOACs have been shown to reduce mortality with rates similar to those of warfarin.Currently, NOACs are spreading slowly into clinical practice because of fears among clinicians and regulatory limitations to their prescription. However, efficacy and safety of NOACs have been confirmed by real-world data, also in elderly and frail patients, who represent the majority of treated subjects. Edoxaban has recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency and marketed from some months. Real-world data are expected shortly. The large body of evidence in support of NOAC efficacy and safety should lead to an increased use of these new drugs in patients affected by atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome

Atrial fibrillation (AF) represents the most common arrhythmia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). As in the general population, in CKD patients AF is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism and stroke. However, CKD patients, especially those on renal replacement therapy (RRT), also exhibit an increased risk of bleeding, especially from the gastrointestinal tract. Oral anticoagulation is the most effective form of thromboprophylaxis in patients with AF presenting increased risk of stroke. Limited evidence on efficacy, the increased risk of bleeding as well as some concern regarding the use of warfarin in CKD, has often resulted in the underuse of anticoagulation CKD patients. A large body of evidence suggests that non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulant agents (NOACs) significantly reduce the risk of stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality, with lower to similar major bleeding rates compared with vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin in normal renal function subjects. Hence, they are currently recommended for patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke. However, NOACs metabolism is largely dependent on the kidneys for elimination and little is known in patients with creatinine clearance <25ml/min who were excluded from all pivotal phase 3 NOACs trials. This review focuses on the current pharmacokinetic, observational, and prospective data on NOACs in patients with moderate to advanced chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance 15-49ml/min) and those on dialysis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) has a worldwide increasing incidence and prevalence, putting patients at risk for atrial thrombus formation and consecutive thromboembolic events. Morbidity and mortality have become a significant global public health care burden. Thus, there is increasing need for safe and effective medical prophylaxis of thromboembolic events. Edoxaban is the fourth approved non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) that has been introduced into the market for the prophylaxis of stroke or systemic embolism in non valvulär AF patients after dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. The pivotal phase III clinical trial evaluating safety and efficacy of edoxaban included more than 21,000 patients. Areas covered: The aim of this expert opinion drug safety review is to introduce edoxaban as a compound, to discuss its development, and its pharmacologic properties. Furthermore, efficacy and safety data of edoxaban - with emphasis on a comparison to oral anticoagulation with warfarin and the other currently available NOACs - are discussed. Ongoing studies that further evaluate edoxaban in special patient populations and disease entities are summarized. Expert opinion: Concerning safety and efficacy, medical compliance, adherence and concomitant diseases like renal impairment are of utmost importance in daily clinical practice, why in the expert opinion part of this review emphasis is put on that issue.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Medication Adherence; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an independent risk factor for stroke. It is most prevalent in the elderly and frequently coexists with heart failure (HF). The joint occurrence of AF and HF further worsens prognosis. The prevention of thromboembolism is crucial in the management of AF. In recent years, new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been licensed for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with AF. Areas covered: This article reviews the key published studies on the pharmacology, clinical efficacy and safety of edoxaban, the latest NOAC to receive approval for the AF indication. This potent and selective inhibitor of factor Xa shows predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles. Its efficacy and safety have been demonstrated in the pivotal, phase III, warfarin-controlled ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial in 21,105 AF patients. Expert opinion: NOACs will likely improve the management of AF, with or without HF. Edoxaban has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile that supports its use in special patient populations, including patients aged ≥75 years, with HF, renal impairment, poor adherence, and on polypharmacy. Proven strategies of edoxaban dose-reduction for optimal use in the presence of moderate renal impairment, and/or use of strong P-gp inhibitors are available.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Humans; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism

Many patients under oral anticoagulation therapy need percutaneous or surgical interventions/operations. For vitamin K antagonists (VKA), there are recommendations regarding preoperative or postoperative administration. Management of the new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) was supposed to be easier - but some aspects must be considered. Due to the different pharmacokinetic profiles of substances such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, different recommendations are given.Upon periprocedural management, thromboembolic risk has to be considered in patients treated with NOACs. NOACS have a pharmacokinetic advantage in terms of a rapid onset and rapid elimination via the liver and kidneys. Impaired renal function results in extended half-life of NOACs considerably.Surgical procedures under NOACS can be scheduled at the beginning of next dosing interval or omitted in low/minimal bleeding risk patients, so that only 2-3 NOAC doses are not administered. In patients with moderate and high risk of bleeding, there should be a NOAC break of 24-48 h prior to surgery in order to allow a corresponding decay of the active metabolite. In patients with low/intermediate risk for thromboembolism, no bridging is necessary if the "unprotected" time (NOAC break) is less than 4-5-(7) days. In patients at high risk of thromboembolism, individual consideration must be taken regarding bridging or extended NOAC break. Whether NOACs can be dispensed or bridging is necessary in these patients must be clarified in randomized trials for periprocedural management of NOACs patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Blood Loss, Surgical; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Half-Life; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

The prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a clinical challenge, primarily owing to drawbacks associated with the use of heparins and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). These and other factors, including a growing elderly population, mean that VTE presents a continuing burden to patients and physicians. Anticoagulant therapy is a fundamental approach for VTE management. Non-VKA oral anticoagulants, including the factor Xa inhibitors apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban, and the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, have been studied in phase III trials across a spectrum of thromboembolic disorders. These agents offer simplified care, with similar or improved efficacy and safety outcomes compared with heparins and vitamin K antagonists. There are several factors a physician must consider when prescribing an anticoagulant. An important consideration with all anticoagulant use is bleeding risk, especially in high-risk groups such as the elderly or those with renal impairment or cancer. In orthopaedic patients, other risks include a need for surgical revision or blood transfusion, or wound complications. Therefore, the clinical benefits of an anticoagulant should ideally be balanced with any risks associated with the therapy. Quantitative benefit-risk assessments are lacking, and owing to differences in trial design the non-VKA oral anticoagulants cannot be compared directly. Based on trial and "real-life" data, this review will summarise the clinical data for the non-VKA oral anticoagulants in the prevention and treatment of VTE, focusing on the balance between the benefits and risks of anticoagulation with these drugs, and their potential impact on VTE management.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Male; Orthopedic Procedures; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are replacing warfarin for many indications. These agents include dabigatran, which inhibits thrombin, and rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, which inhibit factor Xa. All 4 agents are licensed in the United States for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and for treatment of venous thromboembolism and rivaroxaban and apixaban are approved for thromboprophylaxis after elective hip or knee arthroplasty. The NOACs are at least as effective as warfarin, but are not only more convenient to administer because they can be given in fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring but also are safer because they are associated with less intracranial bleeding. As part of a theme series on the NOACs, this article (1) compares the pharmacological profiles of the NOACs with that of warfarin, (2) identifies the doses of the NOACs for each approved indication, (3) provides an overview of the completed phase III trials with the NOACs, (4) briefly discusses the ongoing studies with the NOACs for new indications, (5) reviews the emerging real-world data with the NOACs, and (6) highlights the potential opportunities for the NOACs and identifies the remaining challenges.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Sensitivity and Specificity; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

This study was designed to compare efficacy and safety among novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which have not been directly compared in randomized control trials to date.. We performed network meta-analyses of randomized control trials in preventing thromboembolic events and major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for published studies and various registries of clinical trials for unpublished studies were searched for 2002-2013. All phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of NOACs (apixaban, edoxaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban), idraparinux, and ximelagatran were reviewed.. A systematic literature search identified nine phase III RCTs for primary analyses. The efficacy of each NOAC was similar with respect to our primary composite endpoint following adjustment for open label designs [odds ratios (ORs) versus vitamin K antagonists: apixaban 0.79; dabigatran 150mg 0.77; edoxaban 60mg 0.87; rivaroxaban 0.86] except for dabigatran 110mg and edoxaban 30mg. Apixaban and edoxaban 30mg and 60mg had significantly fewer major bleeding events than dabigatran 150mg, ricvaroxaban, and vitamin K antagonists. All NOACs were similar in reducing secondary endpoints with the exception of dabigatran 110mg and 150mg which were associated with a significantly greater incidence of myocardial infarction compared to apixaban, edoxaban 60mg, and rivaroxaban.. Our indirect comparison with adjustment for study design suggests that the efficacy of the examined NOACs is similar across drugs, but that some differences in safety and risk of myocardial infarction exist, and that open label study designs appear to overestimate safety and treatment efficacy. Differences in study design should be taken into account in the interpretation of results from RCTs of NOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Odds Ratio; Oligosaccharides; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Oral anticoagulation is central to the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and at least one additional stroke risk factor. For decades, the vitamin K antagonists (e.g. warfarin) remained the only oral anticoagulant available for stroke prevention in AF. The non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are now available, and these drugs include the direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors. The latter class includes edoxaban, which has recently been approved for stroke prevention in AF by the United States Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicine Agency. In line with other NOACs, edoxaban avoids the many limitations of warfarin associated with variability of anticoagulation effect and multiple food and drug interactions.. In this review, the currently available evidence on edoxaban in patients with non-valvular AF is discussed. The pharmacology, efficacy and safety, and current aspects of use of edoxaban in patients with non-valvular AF for stroke and thromboembolism prevention are reviewed.. Phase III trials on edoxaban for stroke prevention in non-valvular AF confirms non-inferiority of edoxaban compared to well-managed warfarin both in terms of efficacy and safety. Currently ongoing and future trials as well as real-world data are warranted to confirm its effectiveness and safety for chronic anticoagulation and improve evidence in other areas which are lacking evidence where NOAC use remains controversial.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Risk; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

During recent years, three new anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban) have been introduced to the market, probably with one more anticoagulant (edoxaban) in the next 2 years. This review is not intended to compare the efficacy and risks of these new agents, but rather to detail the advantages and limitations. The pharmacokinetic characteristics of these drugs have few drug and food interactions, predictable dose responses, and rapid onset and offset, thus resulting in simplified management of the patient requiring anticoagulant therapy. No routine laboratory monitoring is required. A somewhat unexpected, but exciting observation involving the new anticoagulants, is the uniform reduction in intracranial bleeding by one-half compared with warfarin. The potential limitations of the new anticoagulants include uncertainty regarding assessment of drug levels, safe drug levels for major surgery, management of major bleeding, renal dependence, multiple dose regimens, adherence in the absence of frequent monitoring and unknown, rare side effects that were not captured in the trials. This review should clarify some of these concerns.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation; Dabigatran; Disease Management; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism

The introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (OACs) for the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic disease represents a shift from the traditional vitamin K antagonist-based therapies, which have been the mainstay of treatment for almost 60 years. A challenge for hospital formularies will be to manage the use of direct OACs from hospital to outpatient settings. Three direct OACs-apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban-are widely approved across different indications, with rivaroxaban approved across the widest breadth of indications. A fourth direct OAC, edoxaban, has also completed phase III trials. Implementation of these agents by physicians will require an understanding of the efficacy and safety profile of these drugs, as well as an awareness of renal function, comedication use, patient adherence and compliance. Optimal implementation of direct OACs in the hospital setting will provide improved patient outcomes when compared with traditional anticoagulants and will simplify the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic diseases.

Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medication Adherence; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome

In the past decade, several new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been studied and approved for the prophylaxis and treatment of arterial and venous thromboembolism. These agents were shown to be as effective as or better than warfarin and resulted in comparable or lower bleeding rates than warfarin. Specific antidotes for the reversal of the anticoagulant effect of these drugs, such as monoclonal antibodies against the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran or recombinant Xa-analog in the case of factor Xa inhibitors, are still being investigated in early clinical trials. In certain situations, as in case of emergency surgery or life-threatening major bleeding, a rapid reversal strategy is needed. Several non-specific prohemostatic agents or coagulation factor concentrates have been suggested as potential candidates for the reversal of NOACs, but the evidence supporting these agents was mainly derived from small animal studies, or is based on partial or complete correction of laboratory parameters in healthy volunteers treated with these agents. Activated prothrombin complex concentrate seems promising for the reversal of dabigatran, while non-activated prothrombin complex concentrates have potential for the reversal of anti-factor Xa. The risk of thromboembolic complications requires careful evaluation. In this article, the evidence- or the lack of it - supporting the use of the different prohemostatic agents for the management of bleeding and for reversal of the different classes of NOACs is discussed.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation Factors; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Hemorrhage; Hemostatics; Humans; Morpholines; Prothrombin; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Elective Surgical Procedures; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Medical Records; Morpholines; Perioperative Period; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism

The standard effective treatment of venous and arterial thromboembolism includes unfractionated and low-molecular weight heparin as well as warfarin, which have major disadvantages. In recent years, new anticoagulants have been developed in an attempt to overcome the known limitations of established treatment and develop improved therapies. This chapter reviews pharmacological properties of the new anticoagulants, the most recent trials assessing their safety and efficacy as well as potential advantages and disadvantages of using these novel drugs in real life.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Benzylamines; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thrombin; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The last decade has seen the evaluation of several new oral anticoagulants that directly target thrombin or activated factor X (FXa). All demonstrate a rapid onset of action, a low potential for food and drug interactions, and a predictable anticoagulant effect that obviates the need for routine coagulation monitoring. Those agents at the most advanced stages of clinical development are a direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran, and direct FXa inhibitors, rivaroxaban and apixaban. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban are approved in more than 70 countries for prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty, and apixaban is being considered for approval by regulatory agencies for this indication. Dabigatran was shown in a large phase III trial to be more effective and safer than warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and has recently been approved for this indication. Edoxaban, an oral FXa inhibitor, is also being evaluated in phase III clinical trials. This review summarizes the pharmacology, clinical trial results, and future role of the new oral anticoagulants in clinical practice.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Amidines; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thrombin; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

Warfarin has been the effective treatment in the prophylaxis of cardioembolism, in particular in patients with atrial fibrillation, for more than 50 years. Nevertheless, many patients with atrial fibrillation are not currently treated because of the numerous limits of oral anticoagulation and in those treated the quality of anticoagulation is often poor. Novel oral anticoagulant drugs, the direct thrombin antagonist dabigatran and factor Xa inhibitors such as rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and betrixaban are more predictable and convenient anticoagulants in comparison with warfarin, mainly because of the non-requirement of regular laboratory monitoring and dose adjustments. Current data from phase III clinical trials are available for dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban, which show to be at least noninferior in efficacy to warfarin for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. This review focuses on the potential of novel anticoagulants to replace warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. Also the place in therapy and the potential limitations of the new agents in clinical practice represent important issues to be considered. The promise of new oral anticoagulants gives us the hope that warfarin will finally be replaced in a near future, but more importantly that anticoagulant undertreatment of atrial fibrillation will be partially overcome.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzamides; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Without thromboprophylaxis, hospital-acquired deep vein thrombosis following major orthopedic surgery occurs with an incidence of approximately 40-60%, which is why thromboprophylaxis has been standard of care in these cases for more than 20 years. Edoxaban (DU-176b; Lixiana) is a novel, once-daily, orally active antithrombotic agent that directly inhibits factor Xa activity in a potent and selective way. It was recently approved in Japan for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total knee replacement, total hip replacement and hip fracture surgery. In phase III trials performed in patients eligible for total knee replacement or total hip replacement, edoxaban 30 mg demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in venous thromboembolic events compared with enoxaparin, with no difference between both treatments in the incidence of major bleeding events. Edoxaban is safe and well tolerated, with predictable pharmacokinetics (low intersubject variability and low protein binding), suggesting that coagulation monitoring may not be required.

Topics: Animals; Clinical Trials as Topic; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Postoperative Complications; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism

Prevention of stroke and systemic emboli is paramount in the management of atrial fibrillation. Although warfarin is the predominant anticoagulant used in patients with atrial fibrillation, it has significant limitations that have impeded appropriate use of stroke prophylaxis in eligible patients with atrial fibrillation. Consequently, much research has been focused on finding an alternative to warfarin. We review the potential alternatives in development and evaluate the current evidence concerning their safety and efficacy.. Oral direct factor Xa inhibitors are potentially well tolerated and effective replacements for warfarin. These agents do not require cofactors and offer selective inhibition at a critical step of amplification in the coagulation cascade. Multiple direct anti-factor Xa agents are currently undergoing evaluation in phase I, II, and III trials. Early results suggest that these novel anticoagulants have favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles with minimal-to-no requirements for therapeutic monitoring. Two direct factor Xa inhibitors are emerging from phase II trials (betrixaban and YM150) and three are being evaluated in phase III trials (apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban) for the prevention of stroke and systemic emboli in patients with atrial fibrillation. The phase III trials of apixaban and rivaroxaban have completed enrollment and are in the follow-up phase.. Given the growing population of patients with atrial fibrillation, there is a great interest in finding new therapies for oral anticoagulation. The direct factor Xa inhibitors may offer several promising alternatives to warfarin therapy.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzamides; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Anticoagulation could not be currently stopped even after successful thoracoscopic ablation of atrial fibrillation for at least 2 months. The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy outcomes between a new oral anticoagulant and warfarin after thoracoscopic ablation. This trial was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled study comparing edoxaban and warfarin in patients undergoing thoracoscopic ablation of atrial fibrillation. This study enrolled 60 patients randomly assigned into 2 groups. The primary endpoint was efficacy outcomes, including stroke and systemic thromboembolic events. The secondary endpoint was safety outcomes including major bleeding and pericarditis. The patients were evaluated at discharge, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. No stroke and thromboembolic events were noted in both treatment groups during the follow-up period. During the 6 months follow-up period, 4 (13%) of 30 patients in the edoxaban group experienced minor bleeding events, whereas none were noted in the warfarin group. Five anticoagulation-related events (bleeding, and prolongation of international normalized ratio), including pericarditis, were noted in both the edoxaban and warfarin groups. No statistically significant difference existed between the 2 groups. In conclusion, this study showed the comparable results of edoxaban to warfarin during the window period of post-thoracoscopic ablation of atrial fibrillation. Moreover, anticoagulation-related events were rather affected by patient factors and not by the anticoagulant type.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pericarditis; Prospective Studies; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

It is unknown whether edoxaban versus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has differential treatment effects on leaflet thrombosis, cerebral thromboembolism, and neurologic or neurocognitive dysfunction according to clinical and anatomic factors after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. To investigate the relative effects of edoxaban and DAPT on leaflet and cerebral thromboembolism in patients with major risk factors. The primary end point of this study was the incidence of leaflet thrombosis on computed tomography at 6 months. The secondary end points were new cerebral lesions on brain magnetic resonance imaging and neurologic and neurocognitive dysfunction between baseline and 6-month follow-up. Cox regression models assessed the consistency of the treatment effects in the prespecified subgroups. The favorable effect of edoxaban versus DAPT on the leaflet thrombosis was consistent across multiple clinical or anatomic subgroups, without significant interaction between the drug effect and each subgroup (p for interaction for age = 0.597, gender = 0.557, body mass index = 0.866, Society of Thoracic Surgeons score = 0.307, valve type = 0.702, edoxaban reduction criteria = 0.604, and valve morphology = 0.688). However, the incidence of new cerebral lesions on brain magnetic resonance imaging and worsening of neurologic and neurocognitive function were not significantly different between the groups among the various key subgroups. The relative effects of edoxaban and DAPT on the risk of leaflet thrombosis, cerebral thromboembolism, and neurologic dysfunction were consistent across a diverse spectrum of clinical or anatomical factors. Further studies are required to define tailored antithrombotic therapy for high-risk groups with specific clinical or anatomic characteristics.

Topics: Aortic Valve; Aortic Valve Stenosis; Female; Humans; Infant; Intracranial Thrombosis; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Thromboembolism; Thrombosis; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement; Treatment Outcome

Early warfarin anticoagulation is recommended in patients undergoing surgical bioprosthetic valve implantation or valve repair. It is unclear whether non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants can be a full alternative to warfarin. This study aimed to compare efficacy and safety of edoxaban with warfarin in patients early after surgical bioprosthetic valve implantation or valve repair.. The Explore the Efficacy and Safety of Edoxaban in Patients after Heart Valve Repair or Bioprosthetic Valve Replacement study was a prospective, randomized (1:1), open-label, clinical trial conducted from December 2017 to September 2019. Patients were randomly assigned to receive edoxaban (60 mg or 30 mg once daily) or warfarin for the first 3 months after surgical bioprosthetic valve implantation or valve repair. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of death, clinical thromboembolic events, or asymptomatic intracardiac thrombosis. The primary safety outcome was the occurrence of major bleeding.. Of 220 participants, 218 (109 per group) were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 4 patients (3.7%) taking warfarin and none taking edoxaban (risk difference, -0.0367; 95% confidence interval, -0.0720 to -0.0014; P < .001 for noninferiority). The primary safety outcome occurred in 1 patient (0.9%) taking warfarin and 3 patients (2.8%) taking edoxaban (risk difference, 0.0183; 95% confidence interval, -0.0172 to 0.0539; P = .013 for noninferiority).. Edoxaban is noninferior to warfarin for preventing thromboembolism and is potentially comparable for risk of major bleeding during the first 3 months after surgical bioprosthetic valve implantation or valve repair.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Prospective Studies; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

It is unknown whether the direct oral anticoagulant edoxaban can reduce leaflet thrombosis and the accompanying cerebral thromboembolic risk after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. In addition, the causal relationship of subclinical leaflet thrombosis with cerebral thromboembolism and neurological or neurocognitive dysfunction remains unclear.. We conducted a multicenter, open-label randomized trial comparing edoxaban with dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel) in patients who had undergone successful transcatheter aortic valve replacement and did not have an indication for anticoagulation. The primary end point was an incidence of leaflet thrombosis on 4-dimensional computed tomography at 6 months. Key secondary end points were the number and volume of new cerebral lesions on brain magnetic resonance imaging and the serial changes of neurological and neurocognitive function between 6 months and immediately after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.. A total of 229 patients were included in the final intention-to-treat population. There was a trend toward a lower incidence of leaflet thrombosis in the edoxaban group compared with the dual antiplatelet therapy group (9.8% versus 18.4%; absolute difference, -8.5% [95% CI, -17.8% to 0.8%];. In patients without an indication for long-term anticoagulation after successful transcatheter aortic valve replacement, the incidence of leaflet thrombosis was numerically lower with edoxaban than with dual antiplatelet therapy, but this was not statistically significant. The effects on new cerebral thromboembolism and neurological or neurocognitive function were also not different between the 2 groups. Because the study was underpowered, the results should be considered hypothesis generating, highlighting the need for further research.. URL: https://www.. gov. Unique identifier: NCT03284827.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aortic Valve; Aortic Valve Stenosis; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Thrombosis; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement; Treatment Outcome

The role of direct oral anticoagulants as compared with vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation after successful transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) has not been well studied.. We conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, adjudicator-masked trial comparing edoxaban with vitamin K antagonists in patients with prevalent or incident atrial fibrillation as the indication for oral anticoagulation after successful TAVR. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of adverse events consisting of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, systemic thromboembolism, valve thrombosis, or major bleeding. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. On the basis of a hierarchical testing plan, the primary efficacy and safety outcomes were tested sequentially for noninferiority, with noninferiority of edoxaban established if the upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval for the hazard ratio did not exceed 1.38. Superiority testing of edoxaban for efficacy would follow if noninferiority and superiority were established for major bleeding.. A total of 1426 patients were enrolled (713 in each group). The mean age of the patients was 82.1 years, and 47.5% of the patients were women. Almost all the patients had atrial fibrillation before TAVR. The rate of the composite primary efficacy outcome was 17.3 per 100 person-years in the edoxaban group and 16.5 per 100 person-years in the vitamin K antagonist group (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 1.31; P = 0.01 for noninferiority). Rates of major bleeding were 9.7 per 100 person-years and 7.0 per 100 person-years, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.91; P = 0.93 for noninferiority); the difference between groups was mainly due to more gastrointestinal bleeding with edoxaban. Rates of death from any cause or stroke were 10.0 per 100 person-years in the edoxaban group and 11.7 per 100 person-years in the vitamin K antagonist group (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.11).. In patients with mainly prevalent atrial fibrillation who underwent successful TAVR, edoxaban was noninferior to vitamin K antagonists as determined by a hazard ratio margin of 38% for a composite primary outcome of adverse clinical events. The incidence of major bleeding was higher with edoxaban than with vitamin K antagonists. (Funded by Daiichi Sankyo; ENVISAGE-TAVI AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02943785.).

Topics: 4-Hydroxycoumarins; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Mortality; Phenindione; Postoperative Complications; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement; Vitamin K

In ENSURE-AF study, edoxaban had similar efficacy and safety profile versus enoxaparin-warfarin (enox-warf) in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion of non-valvular atrial fibrillation.. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of edoxaban versus enox-warf in patients who were vitamin K antagonists (VKA) naïve or experienced at time of randomisation into ENSURE-AF trial.. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of stroke, systemic embolic event, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death during the overall study period, 28 days on study drug after cardioversion and 30 days follow-up. The primary safety endpoint was the composite of major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding during the on-medication period from time of first dose to last dose of study drug taken + 3 days.. Of 2199 patients enrolled in ENSURE-AF, 1095 were randomised to edoxaban and 1104 to enox-warf. There were numerically fewer primary efficacy endpoint events with edoxaban than enox-warf irrespective of whether VKA experienced or naïve (0.5% vs. 0.9%, 0.3% vs. 1.4%, respectively). There were no significant differences in the primary safety endpoint [odds ratio (OR) 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-6.81 in anticoagulant experienced patients, OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.15-3.60 in anticoagulant naïve patients] and in major bleeding rates regardless of treatment or VKA experience (OR 0.69, 95%CI 0.06-6.04, OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.01-9.25, respectively).. Edoxaban had comparable efficacy and safety to optimized anticoagulation with enox-warf. The primary efficacy and safety endpoint outcomes were broadly similar between VKA experienced or naïve patients.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has been the main therapeutic revolution in the last 20 years. Four molecules have been approved for the thromboembolic prophylaxis in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). After the publication of phase 3 clinical trials, many studies evaluating DOAC safety and efficacy in daily clinical practice have been published. Edoxaban is the latest DOAC available on the market, based on the results of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. The phase 4 ETNA-AF (Edoxaban Treatment in Routine Clinical Practice for Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation) observational study was designed with the aim to confirm the results of the pivotal clinical trial in routine care in unselected patients with AF. This registry involved several sites and enrolled a large population in Europe and in Italy (13 980 and 3512 patients, respectively). The broad spectrum of patients will allow to have an overview of the characteristics of the AF population and to make a comparison with previous national registries and between different European realities.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Europe; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Registries; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism

In ENSURE-AF (NCT02072434), the oral Factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban showed similar efficacy and safety vs enoxaparin-warfarin in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). This ancillary analysis compares primary efficacy and safety end points for patients receiving vs not receiving concomitant antiplatelet therapy (APT) in ENSURE-AF.. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of stroke, systemic embolic events, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death during 28 days on study drug after cardioversion plus 30 days of follow-up. The primary safety end point was the composite of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding occurring between the first and the last dose of study drug.. Of 2199 patients enrolled, 1095 were randomized to edoxaban and 1104 to enoxaparin-warfarin. Patients receiving concomitant APT were older; more naïve to vitamin K antagonist; had lower creatinine clearance; and more likely to have history of coronary artery disease, hypertension, diabetes, or ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack. In patients receiving vs not receiving concomitant APT, primary efficacy event rate was numerically higher (0.92% vs 0.60%, p = 0.64) and primary safety event rate was significantly higher (3.21% vs 0.92%, p = 0.0096). Stepwise logistic regression analysis identified age and APT as covariates correlated with bleeding. There was a trend toward increased bleeding risk in elderly patients receiving vs not receiving concomitant APT.. In ENSURE-AF, thromboembolic events were rare and absolute bleeding event rates were higher with concomitant APT. These findings may be relevant for AF-patients considered for dual therapy; even for a short treatment duration of 1 month.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The ongoing prospective, single-arm, observational, phase 4 ETNA-AF Europe study is collecting real-world data about the safety and, secondarily, the effectiveness and therapeutic adherence of newly prescribed edoxaban for non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Europe.. At the end of enrollment in 2018, 13 980 subjects were included, of whom 3509 were Italian. Of them, 3341 (95.2%) had follow-up data available at 1 year.. Their mean age was 75 ± 9.3 years, with 56.9% being ≥75 years old. The CHA2DS2-VASc score was ≥4 in 1380 (41.3%) patients. Overall, 662 patients (19.7%) were judged as "frail" by the investigators. Edoxaban 30 mg/day was given to 1048 (31.4%) subjects, who were older with more comorbidities and a lower estimated creatinine clearance than those prescribed the 60 mg/day dose. Overall, the rates of bleeding and thromboembolic events were low: major bleeding was 1.63%/year, intracranial hemorrhage 0.16%/year, stroke or systemic embolism 0.50%/year and all-cause mortality 3.72%/year. Rates were higher in subjects ≥75 years or with a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥4 and in frail individuals. Remarkably, there was a trend for no increase in intracranial bleeding with more advanced age.. These findings confirm the favorable safety and effectiveness profile of edoxaban in atrial fibrillation patients in routine clinical care in Italy.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Italy; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism

The KYU-RABLE study, a prospective, multicenter, single-arm interventional study, evaluated the efficacy and safety of uninterrupted oral edoxaban in patients undergoing catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF).Methods and Results:We enrolled patients with AF from 23 centers in Japan. Edoxaban 60 mg (30 mg in patients indicated for dose adjustment) was administered uninterrupted, once daily in the morning for ≥4 weeks before CA and 4 weeks ±7 days after CA with one dose delayed on the procedural day. The primary endpoint was a composite of thromboembolism and major bleeding during 4 weeks from the procedural day. Among the 513 eligible patients who underwent CA, 63.5% received edoxaban 60 mg/day and 36.1% received 30 mg/day. For the primary endpoint, no thromboembolism and 1 major bleeding event (0.2%, cardiac tamponade) were observed. The plasma edoxaban concentration decreased depending on the time from the last administration to the CA procedure. However, plasma levels of coagulative biomarkers were within appropriate ranges regardless of the interval from the last administration of edoxaban.. The present study provided evidence of the efficacy and safety of uninterrupted edoxaban administered once daily in the morning, with one dose delayed on procedural day, in patients with AF undergoing CA. Edoxaban was associated with a low risk of periprocedural thromboembolic and bleeding complications.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Catheter Ablation; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Rate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Remission, Spontaneous; Retrospective Studies; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who interrupt anticoagulation are at high risk of thromboembolism and death.. Interruption of study drug was frequent in patients with AF and was associated with a substantial risk of major cardiac and cerebrovascular events over the ensuing 30 days. This risk was particularly high in patients who interrupted as a result of an adverse event; these patients deserve close monitoring and resumption of anticoagulation as soon as it is safe to do so.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin; Withholding Treatment

Direct acting non-Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) are characterized by a fixed dosing regimen. Despite the potential for relative underdosing due to large distribution volumes, dose adjustments for patients with high body mass index (BMI) are not recommended. Since efficacy and safety data in obese patients are scarce, we evaluated the impact of BMI on clinical outcomes in daily care patients treated with NOAC for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism. Using prospectively collected data from a non-interventional registry, cardiovascular (CV), major bleeding events (MB) and all-cause mortality were evaluated according to BMI classes. All outcome events were centrally adjudicated using standard scientific definitions. Between November 1st 2011 and December 31st 2016, 3432 patients were enrolled into the registry (61.3% rivaroxaban; 20% apixaban; 10.1% dabigatran, 8.6% edoxaban; mean follow-up 998.1 ± 542.9 days; median 1004 days). With increasing BMI (range 13.7-57.2 kg/m

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Body Mass Index; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Obesity; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation, also called transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), is the treatment of choice for patients with severe aortic stenosis and intermediate to high operative risk. A significant portion of TAVR patients have atrial fibrillation (AF) requiring chronic oral anticoagulation. In moderate- to high-risk AF patients, the direct factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban is noninferior to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for prevention of stroke or systemic embolism with less bleeding and cardiovascular deaths. ENVISAGE-TAVI AF (NCT02943785) is a multinational, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point evaluation study comparing edoxaban to VKA-based therapy in approximately 1,400 patients with an indication for chronic oral anticoagulation after successful transfemoral TAVR. The coprimary end points are to assess the differential effects of the 2 treatments (a) on net adverse clinical events (the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, systemic thromboembolism, valve thrombosis, and major bleeding events) and (b) on major bleeding. Twelve hours to 5 days after successful TAVR, patients will be randomized to 60 mg daily oral edoxaban or any VKA (international normalized ratio: 2.0-3.0 or 1.6-2.6 [numbers inclusive] in Japan if age ≥ 70 years). Antiplatelet therapy may be administered per physician's discretion. Randomization will be stratified by edoxaban dose reduction (per local label). Treatment duration will be up to 36 months. The study is powered (80%) to detect noninferiority (margin for the hazard ratio: 1.38) for the composite primary end points, followed by superiority testing.

Topics: Aortic Valve; Aortic Valve Stenosis; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Standard of Care; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Thrombolytic Therapy; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement; Treatment Outcome

The ENSURE-AF study (NCT 02072434) of anticoagulation for electrical cardioversion in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) showed comparable low rates of bleeding and thromboembolism between the edoxaban and the enoxaparin-warfarin treatment arms. This post hoc analysis investigated the relationship between renal function and clinical outcomes.. ENSURE-AF was a multicenter, PROBE evaluation trial of edoxaban 60 mg, or dose reduced to 30 mg/d for weight≤60 kg, creatinine clearance (CrCl; Cockcroft-Gault) ≤50 mL/min, or concomitant P-glycoprotein inhibitors compared with therapeutically monitored enoxaparin-warfarin in 2,199 NVAF patients undergoing electrical cardioversion. Efficacy and safety outcomes and time in therapeutic range in the warfarin arm were analyzed in relation to CrCl in prespecified ranges ≥15 and ≤30, >30 and ≤50, >50 and <80, and ≥80 mL/min, and an exploratory ≥95-mL/min analysis.. A total of 1,095 subjects were randomized to edoxaban and 1,104 to enoxaparin-warfarin. Mean age was 64.3±10 and 64.2±11 years. Mean time in therapeutic range was progressively lower with reducing CrCl strata, being 66.8% in those with CrCl >30 to ≤50 compared with 71.8% in those with CrCl ≥80. The odds ratios for the primary efficacy and safety end points were comparable for the different predefined renal function strata; given the small numbers, the 95% CI included 1.0. In the subset of those with CrCl ≥95, the odds ratios showed consistency with the other CrCl strata. When CrCl was assessed as a continuous variable, there was a nonsignificant trend toward higher major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding with reducing CrCl levels, with no significant differences between the 2 treatment arms. When we assessed CrCl at baseline compared with end of treatment, there were no significant differences in CrCl change between the edoxaban and enoxaparin-warfarin arms. The proportions with worsening of renal function (defined as a decrease of >20% from baseline) were similar in the 2 treatment arms.. Given the small number of events in ENSURE-AF, no effect of renal (dys)function was demonstrated in comparing edoxaban to enoxaparin-warfarin for cardioversion; efficacy and safety of edoxaban remained consistent even in patients with normal or supranormal renal function.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Creatinine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Kidney; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Whether the pattern of atrial fibrillation (AF) modifies the risk/benefit of anticoagulation is controversial. In ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial (Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48), the factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban was noninferior to warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolic events and significantly reduced bleeding and cardiovascular mortality. However, detailed analyses by AF pattern have not been reported.. The 21 105 patients were categorized as having paroxysmal (<7 days duration), persistent (≥7 days but <1 year), or permanent (≥1 year or failed cardioversion) AF patterns at randomization. Efficacy and safety outcomes were evaluated during the 2.8 years median follow-up and compared by AF pattern. The primary end point of stroke/systemic embolic event was lower in those patients with paroxysmal AF (1.49%/year), compared with persistent (1.83%/year; P-adj =0.015) and permanent AF (1.95%/year; P-adj =0.004). Overall, all-cause mortality also was lower with paroxysmal (3.0%/year) compared with persistent (4.4%/year; P-adj <0.001) and permanent AF (4.4%/year; P-adj <0.001). Annualized major bleeding rates were similar across AF patterns (2.86% versus 2.65% versus 2.73%). There was no effect modification by treatment assignment.. In ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, patients with paroxysmal AF suffered fewer thromboembolic events and deaths compared with those with persistent and permanent AF. The efficacy and safety profile of edoxaban as compared with warfarin was consistent across the 3 patterns of AF.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00781391.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Bioprosthesis; Blood Coagulation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is caused by antibodies (Abs) specific to platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complexes. In this study, we evaluated the rates of seroconversion of anti-PF4/heparin Ab between patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and with osteoarthritis (OA) who underwent total knee arthroplasty.. The subjects of this randomized controlled trial were 124 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and received edoxaban with or without a foot pump as thromboprophylaxis. We measured anti-PF4/heparin Abs before and 10 days after surgery, as well as preoperative PF4, using commercially available ELISAs. We also used the database of J-PSVT, a hospital-based, prospective cohort study designed to document the effectiveness of thromboprophylactic agents during arthroplasty.. The rates of seroconversion to anti-PF4/heparin Ab were lower in RA patients (4.0 %) than in OA patients (25.5 %). The anti-PF4/heparin IgG optical density (OD) values did not differ before and after surgery in RA patients. In contrast, there was a significant increase in anti-PF4/heparin IgG OD values in OA patients after TKA. In the J-PSVT data, the postoperative seroconversion rates of anti-PF4/heparin Ab were lower in RA patients (10.4 %) than in OA patients (21.8 %) who received fondaparinux. The titers of anti-CCP Ab were significantly lower in RA patients with postoperative ant-PF4/heparin Ab compared with those without postoperative ant-PF4/heparin Ab There was no significant difference in preoperative PF4 levels between RA patients and OA patients. The heparin-binding affinity of the circulating PF4 was similar between RA patients and OA patients; however, the IgG fractions isolated from the sera of RA patients contained PF4 more frequently (69.2 %) than those from OA patients (10.2 %).. Our results showed a reduced likelihood of postoperative anti-PF/heparin Ab production in RA patients compared with OA patients. This suggests that the mechanisms underlying the anti-PF4 immune response in RA patients differ from the mechanisms of the anti-PF4/heparin immune response seen in OA patients after joint replacement.. ISRCTN 18090286. Registered 8 July 2016.

Topics: Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Autoantibodies; Autoantigens; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Immunoblotting; Immunoglobulin G; Male; Middle Aged; Osteoarthritis; Platelet Factor 4; Pyridines; Seroconversion; Thiazoles; Thrombocytopenia; Thromboembolism

Edoxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, is non-inferior for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and is associated with less bleeding than well controlled warfarin therapy. Few safety data about edoxaban in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion are available.. We did a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint evaluation trial in 19 countries with 239 sites comparing edoxaban 60 mg per day with enoxaparin-warfarin in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion of non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The dose of edoxaban was reduced to 30 mg per day if one or more factors (creatinine clearance 15-50 mL/min, low bodyweight [≤60 kg], or concomitant use of P-glycoprotein inhibitors) were present. Block randomisation (block size four)-stratified by cardioversion approach (transoesophageal echocardiography [TEE] or not), anticoagulant experience, selected edoxaban dose, and region-was done through a voice-web system. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of stroke, systemic embolic event, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular mortality, analysed by intention to treat. The primary safety endpoint was major and clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding in patients who received at least one dose of study drug. Follow-up was 28 days on study drug after cardioversion plus 30 days to assess safety. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02072434.. Between March 25, 2014, and Oct 28, 2015, 2199 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive edoxaban (n=1095) or enoxaparin-warfarin (n=1104). The mean age was 64 years (SD 10·54) and mean CHA. ENSURE-AF is the largest prospective randomised clinical trial of anticoagulation for cardioversion of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Rates of major and CRNM bleeding and thromboembolism were low in the two treatment groups.. Daiichi Sankyo provided financial support for the study.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Electric Countershock; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

We designed a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point evaluation parallel group Phase 3b clinical trial comparing edoxaban (a new oral factor Xa inhibitor) with enoxaparin/warfarin followed by warfarin alone in subjects undergoing planned electrical cardioversion of non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The primary efficacy end point is the composite end points of stroke, systemic embolic event, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular (CV) mortality, from randomization until the end of follow-up (day 56 post cardioversion). The primary safety end point is the composite of major and clinically-relevant non-major bleeding, from the first administration of study drug to end of treatment (Day 28 post cardioversion) +3 days. The primary efficacy analysis will be conducted on the intention-to-treat population whereas the primary safety analysis, on the safety population. The study includes stratification on the following levels: (i) approach to cardioversion (transoesophagel echocardiography or non-transoesophagel echocardiography) as determined by the Investigator; (ii) subject's experience in taking anticoagulants at the time of randomization (anticoagulant-experienced or anticoagulant-naïve); and (iii) assigned edoxaban dose (full 60 mg QD or reduced 30 mg dose QD). A subject with one or more factors (CrCl ≥15 mL/min and ≤50 mL/min, low body weight [≤60 kg], and concomitant use of p-pg inhibitors (excluding amiodarone) will receive a reduced dose (30 mg) of edoxaban if the subject is randomized to the edoxaban group. ENSURE-AF will be the largest prospective randomised trial of anticoagulation for cardioversion, also involving a Non-VKA Oral Anticoagulant-edoxaban.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Research Design; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Edoxaban is an oral, direct, once-daily factor Xa inhibitor. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of edoxaban compared to subcutaneous enoxaparin in Japanese patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.. In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-comparator, phase 3 trial, 92 patients were randomized 2:1 to receive edoxaban 30mg once daily (n=62) or enoxaparin sodium (enoxaparin) 2000IU (equivalent to 20mg) twice daily (n=30) for 11 to 14days. The primary endpoints were the incidence of major or clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding and incidence of any bleeding events (major, CRNM, or minor bleeding). Secondary efficacy endpoints included the incidence of thromboembolic events, venous thromboembolism-related deaths, and all-cause deaths. Additional adverse events were recorded throughout the study.. In the edoxaban and enoxaparin treatment groups, the incidence of major or CRNM bleeding was 3.4% and 6.9%, respectively, while any bleeding event occurred in 25.4% and 17.2% of patients, respectively. The incidence of thromboembolic events was 6.5% in the edoxaban group and 3.7% in the enoxaparin group. All events were asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis. The incidence of adverse events was 72.9% and 82.8% in the edoxaban and enoxaparin groups, respectively.. Compared to subcutaneous enoxaparin 2000IU twice daily, oral edoxaban 30mg once daily demonstrated similar safety and efficacy in the prevention of thromboembolic events in Japanese patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.. NCT01181141.

Topics: Aged; Blood Loss, Surgical; Drug Administration Schedule; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hip Fractures; Humans; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism

This phase 3 trial compared the safety and efficacy of edoxaban, an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, with enoxaparin sodium (enoxaparin) for thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients in Japan and Taiwan.. In this randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study, patients received oral edoxaban 30 mg once daily beginning 6 to 24 hours postsurgery or enoxaparin 2000 IU (equivalent to 20 mg) subcutaneously twice daily beginning 24 to 36 hours postsurgery for 11 to 14 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of symptomatic pulmonary embolism and symptomatic and asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis. Safety endpoints included the incidence of major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding, major bleeding or CRNM bleeding, all bleeding events, adverse events, and adverse drug reactions.. Of 716 patients enrolled, 360 and 356 were randomized to receive edoxaban or enoxaparin, respectively. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 22/299 (7.4%) and 41/295 (13.9%) patients in the edoxaban and enoxaparin groups, respectively (relative risk reduction=46.8%), indicating non-inferiority (P <0.001) and superiority (P=0.010) of edoxaban versus enoxaparin. In the edoxaban and enoxaparin groups, major bleeding occurred in 4/354 (1.1%) versus 1/349 (0.3%) patients (P=0.373); major or CRNM bleeding occurred in 22/354 (6.2%) versus 13/349 (3.7%) patients (P=0.129), respectively.. Edoxaban 30 mg once daily was more effective for thromboprophylaxis than subcutaneous enoxaparin 2000 IU twice daily following TKA and demonstrated a similar incidence of bleeding events.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Double-Blind Method; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Pyridines; Risk Assessment; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome

Extensive data support the superior safety without any trade-off in efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Whether DOACs may be successfully used to treat complex and fragile patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) remains to be proven. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility, anticoagulant effect, and preliminary safety/efficacy profile of edoxaban administered via PEG in patients with an indication for long-term oral anticoagulation.. In this prospective, single-arm, pilot study, 12 patients with PEG and guideline-recommended indication for anticoagulation for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation were prospectively enrolled. Crushed edoxaban at approved doses was administered via PEG. Quantitative measures of edoxaban's antifactor Xa activity were performed at steady state. Thromboembolic and bleeding events were assessed at one-month follow-up.. Steady state edoxaban plasma levels were at therapeutic range in all patients; mean plasma concentration was 208.5 (±78.6) ng/mL. At one month follow-up, none had suffered a thromboembolic event; one developed minor bleeding, and one died from non-cardiovascular death, owing to sudden worsening of a pre-existing underlying severe condition.. In this pilot investigation, we report for the first time that crushed edoxaban, administered at approved doses through PEG in fragile and complex patients, is feasible, results in therapeutic edoxaban concentrations, and is apparently effective and safe.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrostomy; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Thromboembolism

Recent data have suggested that insulin-requiring diabetes mostly contributes to the overall increase of thromboembolic risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) on warfarin. We evaluated the prognostic role of a different diabetes status on clinical outcome in a large cohort of AF patients treated with edoxaban.. We accessed individual patients' data from the prospective, multicenter, ETNA-AF Europe Registry. We compared the rates of ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA)/systemic embolism, myocardial infarction (MI), major bleeding and all-cause death at 2 years according to diabetes status.. Out of an overall population of 13,133 patients, 2885 had diabetes (22.0%), 605 of whom (21.0%) were on insulin. The yearly incidence of ischemic stroke/TIA/systemic embolism was 0.86% in patients without diabetes, 0.87% in diabetic patients not receiving insulin (p = 0.92 vs no diabetes) and 1.81% in those on insulin (p = 0.002 vs no diabetes; p = 0.014 vs diabetes not on insulin). The annual rates of MI and major bleeding were 0.40%, 0.43%, 1.04% and 0.90%, 1.10% and 1.71%, respectively. All-cause yearly mortality was 3.36%, 5.02% and 8.91%. At multivariate analysis, diabetes on insulin was associated with a higher rate of ischemic stroke/TIA/systemic embolism [adjusted HR 2.20, 95% CI 1.37-3.54, p = 0.0011 vs no diabetes + diabetes not on insulin] and all-cause death [aHR 2.13 (95% CI 1.68-2.68, p < 0.0001 vs no diabetes]. Diabetic patients not on insulin had a higher mortality [aHR 1.32 (1.11-1.57), p = 0.0015], but similar incidence of stroke/TIA/systemic embolism, MI and major bleeding, vs those without diabetes.. In a real-world cohort of AF patients on edoxaban, diabetes requiring insulin therapy, rather than the presence of diabetes per se, appears to be an independent factor affecting the occurrence of thromboembolic events during follow-up. Regardless of the diabetes type, diabetic patients had a lower survival compared with those without diabetes.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Diabetes Mellitus; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Insulins; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Ischemic Stroke; Myocardial Infarction; Prospective Studies; Registries; Stroke; Thromboembolism

Although widely used in clinical fields, real-world data on the role of warfarin and non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for the secondary prevention of thromboembolic complications in ischemic stroke patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) are scarce.. This retrospective cohort study compared the effectiveness and safety of secondary prevention of NOAC and warfarin in ischemic stroke patients with NVAF.. From the Korean National Health Insurance Service Database, we included 16,762 oral anticoagulants-naive acute ischemic stroke patients with NVAF between July 2016 and June 2019. The main outcomes included ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, and all-cause of death.. In total, 1717 warfarin and 15,025 NOAC users were included in the analysis. After 1:8 propensity score matching, during the observation period, all types of NOACs had a significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism than warfarin (edoxaban: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.93, rivaroxaban: aHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.96, apixaban: aHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69-0.91, and dabigatran: aHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.97). Edoxaban (aHR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.96), apixaban (aHR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.90), and dabigatran (aHR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51-0.86) had lower risks of major bleeding and all-cause of death.. All NOACs were more effective than warfarin in the secondary prevention of thromboembolic complications in ischemic stroke patients with NVAF. Except for rivaroxaban, most NOACs demonstrated a lower risk of major bleeding and all-cause of death than warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) represent the cornerstone therapy for cardioembolic events prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). In practice, the choice of one DOAC over another is guided by the decision-making process of the physician, which considers specific patient and drug characteristics. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical features and long-term outcomes of a real-world population treated with DOACs, where the use of the 4 different DOACs is quite equal. We conducted a retrospective observational, single-center, multidisciplinary study enrolling consecutive NVAF patients treated with one of the 4 DOACs. From an initial number of 753 patients, we excluded 72 patients because of loss to follow-up, at the end we enrolled 681:174 (23%) treated with dabigatran, 175 (23%) with apixaban, 190 (25%) with rivaroxaban, and 214 (29%) with edoxaban. Patients treated with apixaban were significantly older, more women represented (p <0.001), and with a higher cardioembolic and bleeding risk (p <0.001). Dabigatran was preferred in patients with liver failure (p = 0.008), whereas Apixaban and Edoxaban were chosen in chronic kidney disease (p = 0.002). At 3-year follow-up, 20 patients (2.7%) experienced a systemic thromboembolic event without significant differences in the 4 DOACs. In the same period, an International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis classification major bleeding event occurred in 26 patients (3.6%), more statistically correlated to edoxaban (6.1%) (p = 0.038). Thromboembolic events or major bleeding were higher in the edoxaban group (10%) compared with the others (p = 0.014). In our single-center real-world experience, the choice of the DOAC for a patient with NVAF was tailored to specific clinical features and drug pharmacokinetics of the patient. As a result, a small number of adverse events were observed.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

Limited data were published on the management of direct oral anticoagulants in the insertion of pacemaker and cardiac monitoring devices. This study describes the management and outcomes of edoxaban, a direct oral factor Xa inhibitor, in patients undergoing pacemaker or monitoring device implantation in routine clinical practice.. EMIT-AF/VTE collected data of patients from Europe, Korea, and Taiwan. Timing and duration of periprocedural interruption of edoxaban were at the treating physician's discretion. Pacemakers or monitoring devices were implanted into 136 patients who were evaluated from 5 days pre- until 30 days post-procedure. The primary outcomes were the incidences of acute thromboembolic events (ATE), ischemic events, and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis-defined Major Bleeding; secondary outcomes included incidence of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) and perioperative edoxaban interruption times. Conformance with European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) Guidance on interruption of direct oral anticoagulant therapy was variable: of the cardiac monitoring device patients, where no interruption of therapy would be expected, nonetheless, 62.5% had interruption of treatment, whereas in pacemaker procedures, where interruption would be expected, 23.4% had no interruption. No ATE or ischemic events occurred. One case of CRNMB and two of minor bleeding occurred. All bleedings occurred more than 3 days after the procedure.. The periprocedural complication risk for edoxaban treated patients undergoing pacemaker or invasive cardiac monitoring implantation was low. This population of patients was well managed in routine practice.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices; Europe; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Male; Pacemaker, Artificial; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Republic of Korea; Risk Factors; Taiwan; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism

The effectiveness and safety of edoxaban 60 mg and 30 mg for stroke prevention compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation have not been well-described in a nationwide cohort of Caucasian patients treated in standard clinical practice.. We used Danish nationwide registries to identify patients with atrial fibrillation during June 2016 and November 2018 who were treated with edoxaban or warfarin and computed rates per 100 person-years of thromboembolic, all-cause mortality, and bleeding events using an inverse probability of treatment weighting approach to account for baseline confounding. We used weighted pooled logistic regression to compute hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals comparing events between edoxaban 60 mg and warfarin users; edoxaban 30 mg was not included in formal comparisons.. We identified 6451 atrial fibrillation patients, mean age was 72 years and 40% were females. A total of 1772 patients were treated with edoxaban 60 mg, 537 with edoxaban 30 mg, and 4142 with warfarin. The median CHA. Edoxaban 60 mg is a safe and effective treatment compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in routine clinical care for Danish (mainly Caucasian) patients with AF, with non-significantly different risks for stroke and clinically relevant bleeding, but lower all-cause mortality.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Delayed bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients receiving anticoagulants remains an unpreventable adverse event. Although direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have superior efficacy in preventing thromboembolism, their effects on the occurrence of delayed bleeding remain unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the clinical effect of DOACs on delayed bleeding after gastric ESD.. We retrospectively examined 728 patients who received anticoagulants and were treated for gastric neoplasms with ESD in 25 institutions across Japan. Overall, 261 patients received DOACs, including dabigatran (92), rivaroxaban (103), apixaban (45) and edoxaban (21), whereas 467 patients were treated with warfarin.. Delayed bleeding occurred in 14% of patients taking DOACs, which was not considerably different in patients receiving warfarin (18%). Delayed bleeding rate was significantly lower in patients receiving dabigatran than in those receiving warfarin and lower than that observed for other DOACs. Multivariate analysis showed that age ≥ 65, receiving multiple antithrombotic agents, resection of multiple lesions and lesion size ≥ 30 mm were independent risk factors, and that discontinuation of anticoagulants was associated with a decreased risk of bleeding. In multivariate analysis among patients taking DOACs, dabigatran therapy was associated with a significantly lower risk of delayed bleeding.. The effects of DOACs on delayed bleeding varied between agents, but dabigatran therapy was associated with the lowest risk of delayed bleeding. Switching oral anticoagulants to dabigatran during the perioperative period could be a reasonable option to reduce the risk of delayed bleeding after gastric ESD.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Endoscopic Mucosal Resection; Female; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stomach; Stomach Neoplasms; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Biomarkers; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proteomics; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants represent a new option for prevention of embolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, little is known about the impact of non-cardiac comorbidities on the efficacy and safety profile of these drugs.. In a post hoc analysis of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, we analysed 21 105 patients with AF followed for an average of 2.8 years and randomized to either a higher-dose edoxaban regimen (HDER), a lower-dose edoxaban regimen, or warfarin. We used the updated Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) to stratify the patients according to the burden of concomitant disease (CCI = 0, 1, 2, 3, and ≥4). The treatment groups were then compared for safety, efficacy, and net clinical outcomes across CCI categories. There were 32.0%, 7.3%, 42.1%, 12.7%, and 6.0% of patients with CCI scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, and ≥4, respectively. A CCI score ≥4 was associated with significantly higher rates of thromboembolic events, bleeding, and death compared to CCI = 0 (P < 0.05 for each). The annualized rates of the primary net clinical outcome (stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, or death) for CCI = 0, 1, 2, 3, or ≥4 were 5.9%, 8.7%, 6.6%, 10.3%, and 13.6% (Ptrend < 0.001). There were no significant interactions between treatment with HDER vs. warfarin and efficacy, safety, and net outcomes across the CCI groups (P-interaction > 0.10 for each).. Although increasing CCI scores are associated with worse outcomes, the efficacy, safety, and net clinical outcomes of edoxaban vs. warfarin were independent of the degree of comorbidity present.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Comorbidity; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Cryoballoon ablation is an established catheter-based approach to treat atrial fibrillation (AF). However, thromboembolic events cannot be avoided during cryoablation. There is little data regarding the blood coagulation status during freezing.The thrombin antithrombin complex (TAT) and prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F 1+2) of patient blood were measured during cryoballoon application when the cryoballoon temperature reached the nadir in 63 AF patients. TAT was also measured from porcine blood during cryoballoon freezing in 5 pigs.The TAT and F 1+2 increased from 6.60 ± 5.65 to 9.16 ± 7.28 ng/mL (P = 0.004) and from 279.6 ± 146.4 to 323.6 ± 169.1 pmol/L (P = 0.003) between the control and during freezing, respectively. The TAT increased from 0.46 to 0.87 ng/mL during freezing compared to that of pre-freezing (P < 0.05), and it returned to 0.39 ng/mL in 30 minutes after an intravenous edoxaban administration (N.S.).Dabigatran failed to exert sufficient anticoagulant effects during cryofreezing. In contrast, intravenous edoxaban seemed to provoke anticoagulation effects under extreme low temperature circumstances.

Topics: Aged; Antithrombins; Cryosurgery; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism

Guidance for periprocedural anticoagulant management is mainly based on limited data from Phase III or observational studies and expert opinion.. EMIT-AF/VTE was designed to document the risks of bleeding and thromboembolic events in more than 1000 patients on edoxaban undergoing diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in clinical practice.. Routine care in a multinational multicenter, prospective observational study. Participants were adult patients with atrial fibrillation and/or venous thromboembolism treated with edoxaban for stroke prevention or for secondary prevention in venous thromboembolic disease, undergoing a wide range of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Edoxaban therapy was interrupted periprocedurally at the treating physician's discretion. Patients were evaluated from 5 days pre- until 30 days postprocedure. Primary outcome was the incidence of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis defined major bleeding; secondary outcomes included incidence of clinically relevant non-major bleeding, acute coronary syndrome, and acute thromboembolic events.. Outcomes and management are reported for the first procedures in 1155 unselected patients. Five cases of major bleeding (0.4%) and eight of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (0.7%) were documented, five (38%) of which occurred outside the period of likely edoxaban effect (last edoxaban dose ≥3 days prior to bleeding). Five (0.4%) deaths from any cause, seven acute thromboembolic events (0.6%) including two cardiac deaths (0.2%) in six patients, and one acute coronary event (0.1%) occurred.. The periprocedural bleeding and acute thromboembolic event risks for patients treated with edoxaban were low. This can help inform both clinical routine and guidelines for the periprocedural management of edoxaban.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Perioperative Period; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome

There is little data on management and outcomes of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) undergoing general surgery.We retrospectively assessed 98 surgeries in 85 nonvalvular AF patients aged 73 ± 8 (59 men) receiving DOACs. Cardiac, emergency, and minimally invasive surgeries were excluded.The CHA

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Loss, Surgical; Carotid Artery Diseases; Cerebral Infarction; Dabigatran; Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Elective Surgical Procedures; Embolism; Endoscopy; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Orthopedic Procedures; Perioperative Care; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Urologic Surgical Procedures; Vascular Surgical Procedures

Annually > 10% of patients with atrial fibrillation on oral anticoagulation undergo invasive procedures. Optimal peri-procedural management of anticoagulation, as judged by major bleeding and thromboembolic events, especially in the elderly, is still debated.. Procedures from 1442 patients were evaluated. Peri-procedural edoxaban management was guided only by the experience of the attending physician. The primary safety outcome was the rate of major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included the peri-procedural administration of edoxaban, other bleeding events, and the main efficacy outcome, a composite of acute coronary syndrome, non-hemorrhagic stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolic events, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and mortality.. Of the 1442 patients, 280 (19%) were < 65, 550 (38%) were 65-74, 514 (36%) 75-84, and 98 (7%) were 85 years old or older. With increasing age, comorbidities and risk scores were higher. Any bleeding complications were uncommon across all ages, ranging from 3.9% in patients < 65 to 4.1% in those 85 years or older; major bleeding rates in any age group were ≤ 0.6%. Interruption rates and duration increased with advancing age. Thromboembolic events were more common in the elderly, with all nine events occurring in those > 65, and seven in patients aged > 75 years.. Despite increased bleeding risk factors in the elderly, bleeding rates were small and similar across all age groups. However, there was a trend toward more thromboembolic complications with advancing age. Further efforts to identify the optimal management to reduce ischemic complications are needed.. NCT# 02950168, October 31, 2016.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Asia; Atrial Fibrillation; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Drug Administration Schedule; Europe; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Perioperative Care; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome

A woman in her 70s developed deep vein thromboembolism(DVT)and pulmonary embolism(PE)during chemotherapy for advanced transverse colon cancer. After the first treatment with heparin and warfarin, the anticoagulant was changed to edoxaban to reduce the risk of bleeding. She continued receiving chemotherapy for 4 years. We recommend edoxaban as the first choice of anticoagulant for patients with DVT and PE requiring chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine-based antineoplastic agents.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Colonic Neoplasms; Fluorouracil; Humans; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Venous Thromboembolism

There is a high degree of uncertainty regarding optimum care of patients with potential or known intake of oral anticoagulants and traumatic brain injury (TBI). Anticoagulation therapy aggravates the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage but, on the other hand, patients take anticoagulants because of an underlying prothrombotic risk, and this could be increased following trauma. Treatment decisions must be taken with due consideration of both these risks. An interdisciplinary group of Austrian experts was convened to develop recommendations for best clinical practice. The aim was to provide pragmatic, clear, and easy-to-follow clinical guidance for coagulation management in adult patients with TBI and potential or known intake of platelet inhibitors, vitamin K antagonists, or non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. Diagnosis, coagulation testing, and reversal of anticoagulation were considered as key steps upon presentation. Post-trauma management (prophylaxis for thromboembolism and resumption of long-term anticoagulation therapy) was also explored. The lack of robust evidence on which to base treatment recommendations highlights the need for randomized controlled trials in this setting.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Austria; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Consensus; Dabigatran; Deamino Arginine Vasopressin; Humans; Interdisciplinary Communication; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Tranexamic Acid; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

Whether four direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are superior to warfarin in Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) remains unclear.. This nationwide retrospective cohort study was based on data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database from June 1, 2012, to December 31, 2017, covering patients with NVAF taking edoxaban (n = 4,577), apixaban (n = 9,952), rivaroxaban (n = 33,022), dabigatran (n = 22,371), and warfarin (n = 19,761). Propensity score weighting was used to balance covariates across study groups. Patients were followed up until occurrence of study outcomes or end date of study.. In the largest real-world practice study among Asian patients with NVAF, four DOACs were associated with a comparable or lower risk of thromboembolism, and a lower risk of bleeding than warfarin. There was consistency even among high-risk subgroups and whether standard-or low-dose regimens were compared.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Taiwan; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Conventional coagulation assays have poor sensitivity and specificity for assessing the anticoagulant effect of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). This study aimed to evaluate the causes and consequences of the excessive prolongation of coagulation time in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who receive DOACs.. We retrospectively analysed 1521 patients (age, 66 ± 12 years). The prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) were averaged if they were measured more than twice depending on the respective DOAC and dosage across individuals. Excessive coagulation time prolongation was defined as PT or APTT of >2 standard deviations over the median for each DOAC.. In all, 1913 DOAC cases were found. Excessive prolongation (EP), which was noted in 88 patients (5.8%), was found to be significantly associated with inappropriately high DOAC dosage and body weight (≤ 60 kg). During follow-up (median, 8.9 months), thromboembolisms developed in 10 patients (0.66%) and bleeding events in 85 (5.6%). Bleeding events were significantly higher in patients with excessive prolongation (EP group) than in those without (P = 0.013). Of the 53 patients in the EP group, 15 (28%) were positive for antiphospholipid antibodies, 6 (11%) had inappropriately high prescription dosages, 4 (8%) had coagulation factor deficiencies, and 3 (6%) had severe liver dysfunction.. Bleeding event rates were remarkably higher in patients receiving DOACs that caused EP of PT or APTT. Thus, following the current guidelines and administering the recommended dose of DOACs are fundamentally important. Patients with the body weight of <60 kg should be considered for dosage reduction or DOAC withdrawal.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Blood Coagulation Tests; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Japan; Male; Prognosis; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism

The purpose of the current study was to compare the efficacy and safety of edoxaban versus vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy among a cohort of elderly patients (ie, those aged ≥75 years) with atrial fibrillation (AF) in a real-life setting.. A propensity score-matched cohort observational study was performed comparing the safety and efficacy of edoxaban versus VKA therapy among a cohort of elderly (aged ≥75 years) patients with AF in a real-life setting. Follow-up data were obtained through outpatient visits at 1, 3, and every 6 months. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of stroke, transient ischemic attack, and systemic embolism.. A total of 130 patients receiving edoxaban 60 mg (EDO) treatment were compared with the same number of VKA recipients. The mean follow-up was 16 (2.6) months. The cumulative incidence of thromboembolic events in the EDO and VKA groups was 1.5% (2 of 130) and 2.3% (3 of 130), respectively (P < 0.6). The cumulative incidence of major bleeding events was 1.5% (2 of 130) in the EDO group and 3.1% (4 of 130) in the VKA group (P < 0.4). The total anticoagulant therapy discontinuation rate was 2.3% (3 of 130) in the EDO group and 4.6% (6 of 130) in the VKA group (P < 0.3). A nonsignificant trend in improved adherence was observed between the EDO and VKA groups (81% vs 78%; P = 0.6).. Edoxaban therapy showed a good real-life performance among elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) with AF.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Propensity Score; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

Edoxaban was extracted from human plasma by simple protein precipitation with acetonitrile, followed by quantitative determination using a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method. The recoveries of edoxaban and the internal standard (ticlopidine) from human plasma were >85%, and the within- and between-day coefficients of variation were within 15%. The limit of quantification in human plasma was 1 ng/mL. The concentration of edoxaban in blood decreased at room temperature, but remained unchanged for 1 week at 4°C. On the other hand, the concentration in plasma at both -20 and -80°C remained unchanged for 5 months. These results indicated that blood samples should be centrifuged immediately or stored at 4°C, and that plasma samples should be stored below -20°C until analysis. This method was applied to human plasma obtained from four patients after total knee arthroplasty. Analysis of edoxaban pharmacokinetics demonstrated an absorption time lag of 4h, a maximum concentration of 110 ± 26 ng/mL and an oral clearance of 37 ± 16 L/h. The analytical methods established in this study will be suitable for determining the concentrations of edoxaban in human plasma.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Chromatography, Liquid; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Linear Models; Male; Postoperative Complications; Pyridines; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism

Atrial fibrillation is the most common clinically relevant arrhythmia frequently causing systemic thromboembolic events. Traditionally vitamin K antagonists had been used for decades to prevent these events. The emerging of the new direct anticoagulants has revolutionized this treatment and a gradual growth and extensive spread of usage is expected. The latest one approved in Hungary, edoxaban, is a factor Xa inhibitor. Once-daily administration and favourable safety profile are major benefits of this drug. In a large clinical study with a high number of patients it proved to be at least as effective as warfarin in the prevention of stroke and systemic embolization while causing significantly less major bleedings. As the incidence of atrial fibrillation increases with age, the observation that, compared with the other direct oral anticoagulants, the administration of edoxaban in the elderly has a favourable net clinical benefit (in the rate of prevented thromboembolic events and the number of caused bleedings) may have a great importance. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(20): 798-802.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Hungary; Male; Patient Safety; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome

Inappropriate doses of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are often prescribed. This study evaluated the prevalence, outcomes, and predictors of the prescription of inappropriately low doses of 4 types of DOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data from a single-center registry with 2272 patients prescribed DOACs for AF (apixaban: 1014; edoxaban: 267; rivaroxaban: 498; dabigatran: 493). Patients were monitored for 2years and classified into appropriate-dose (n = 1,753; including appropriate low doses), inappropriate-low-dose (n = 490) and inappropriate-high-dose groups (n = 29). Major bleeding (MB) and thromboembolic events (TEEs) were evaluated.. In a single-center registry, 23% of patients with AF treated with a DOAC received an inappropriate dose. Several clinical factors, such as age and the creatinine clearance value, can identify patients at risk of under-treatment with DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Chi-Square Distribution; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Drug Dosage Calculations; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Inappropriate Prescribing; Incidence; Japan; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Prevalence; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Background Patients with impaired liver function ( ILF ) were excluded from clinical trials that investigated non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants ( NOAC s) for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NOAC s in atrial fibrillation patients with ILF . Methods and Results A cohort study based on electronic medical records was conducted from 2009 to 2016 at a multicenter healthcare provider in Taiwan and included 6451 anticoagulated atrial fibrillation patients (aged 76.7±7.0 years, 52.5% male). Patients were classified into 2 subgroups: patients with normal liver function (n=5818) and patients with ILF (n=633, 9.8%). Cox regression analysis was performed to investigate the risks of thromboembolism, bleeding, and death associated with use of NOAC s and warfarin in patients with normal liver function and ILF , respectively. In patients with normal liver function, compared with warfarin therapy (n=2928), NOAC therapy (n=4048) was associated with significantly lower risks of stroke or systemic embolism (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.88; P<0.001) and death (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.80; P<0.001) with no difference in major bleeding or gastrointestinal bleeding. In patients with ILF , compared with warfarin therapy (n=394), NOAC therapy (n=342) was associated with significantly lower risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.83; P<0.001), but no difference in stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, or gastrointestinal bleeding. Conclusions In atrial fibrillation patients with ILF , NOAC therapy and warfarin therapy were associated with similar risks of stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, and gastrointestinal bleeding.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Hepatic Insufficiency; Humans; Male; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

In this age of evidence-based medicine, the use of medical thrombosis prophylaxis stockings (AES) as a physical strategy for the prevention of lower limb venous thrombosis has been questioned. The current German S3 guidelines even state that their non-application is, in the vast majority of cases, explicitly covered by the recommendations of this guideline. Low molecular weight heparins (NMH) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOAK) have received approval for thrombosis prophylaxis in elective knee and hip joint replacement, but the use of AES is absent from these approval studies. The results of the additional effects of the AES in the approval studies of Edoxaban were published for the first time. According to these results, the incidence of venous thromboembolism was 6.0% when AES were worn and 13.0% when AES were not worn. Since the approval studies of NMH and the DOAKs did not control for the use of AES, the impact of AES on the overall results remains unclear. Therefore the study results are only valid in the context of the general application of AES. Guidelines commissions should take this into account in their recommendations.. Der Nutzen von medizinischen Thromboseprophylaxestrümpfen (AES) als physikalisches Mittel zur Prävention von venösen Thrombosen der unteren Extremität wird im Zeitalter der evidenzbasierten Medizin infrage gestellt. Die aktuellen S3-Leitlinien schreiben sogar, dass ihre Nichtanwendung in den allermeisten Fällen explizit im Empfehlungskorridor dieser Leitlinie liegt. Die niedermolekularen Heparine (NMH) und die direkten oralen Antikoagulanzien (DOAK) haben über Studien zur Thromboseprophylaxe bei elektivem Knie- und Hüftgelenkersatz ihre Zulassung erhalten, allerdings ist zur Anwendung von AES in diesen Zulassungsstudien nichts bekannt. Nun wurden erstmals die Ergebnisse der zusätzlichen Wirkung der AES in den Zulassungsstudien von Edoxaban publiziert. Danach betrug die Inzidenz von venösen Thromboembolien 6,0%, wenn AES getragen wurden, und 13,0%, wenn keine AES getragen wurden. Da in den Zulassungsstudien von NMH und den DOAKs nicht die Anwendung von AES kontrolliert wurde, kann nicht gesagt werden, wie groß der Effekt der AES auf das Gesamtergebnis ist, und die Studienergebnisse gelten nur vor dem Hintergrund der allgemeinen Anwendung von AES.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Combined Modality Therapy; Drug Approval; Evidence-Based Medicine; Germany; Guideline Adherence; Postoperative Complications; Pyridines; Stockings, Compression; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Since first used in 2009, non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC) have gained world-wide acceptance. Two groups of NOAC are currently used: the direct thrombin antagonist dabigatran and three direct factor  Xa antagonists apixaban, edoxaban, and ricaroxaban. With their increasing use for prevention of thromboembolism, the probability increases that NOAC-pretreated patients are admitted to emergency departments or intensive care units.The clinical challenge in NOAC preanticoagulated patients is to adequately cope with the given anticoagulated status of such patients. Because of their short half-life, many patients will be adequately treated with a "wait and see" approach, and surgeries and interventions are postponed until anticoagulant activities have totally subsided. In the few cases where immediate action is mandated, based on appropriate risk assessments it can be decided either to take the increased hemorrhagic risk of early intervention or to transfuse factor concentrates like PPSB or FEIBA which can safely reverse the anticoagulant activities of the three factor Xa antagonists (and potentially also of dabigatran). Recently a humanized Fab antibody fragment for dabigatran, idarucizumab, has been introduced onto the market, that can immediately reverse the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran. For the reversal of dabigatran, idarucizumab is therefore the drug of choice.In addition, in some specific indications of emergency and intensive care medicine, the primary use of a NOAC can be considered advantageous. Such indications are early cardioversion in patients admitted for new episodes of atrial fibrillation and patients with acute pulmonary embolism. For the widespread use of low-molecular-weight heparins in such indications, however, the decision to use a NOAC for anticoagulant therapy is frequently postponed to the treatment phase when the stabilized patient is already treated on the general ward.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Electric Countershock; Emergency Service, Hospital; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thrombin; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Clinical trials of antithrombotic therapy require a cohesive assessment of benefit and risk. A new graphical method to represent the bivariate relation of benefit and risk in trials of antithrombotic drugs is described and illustrated using published data from the four major registration clinical trials of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) totalling 71,683 patients for prevention of thromboembolic events (TE) in patients with atrial fibrillation (RE-LY, ROCKET AF, ARISTOTLE, and ENGAGE-AF TIMI48). A curve representing a null hypothesis defines a region of benefit on a two-dimensional plane. Trial results are summarised by a rectangle defined by standard 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for thrombosis and bleeding risks. Benefit is judged by whether the confidence rectangle contains the null curve. The treatment effect is measured by the distance from the null curve to the opposing corners of the confidence rectangle (termed "corner distance (CD)"). Across trials NOACs reduced the absolute risk of TE compared to warfarin by 0.30 % (95 % CI: -0.56 % to -0.05 %) and reduced major bleeding by 0.88 % (95 % CI: -1.26 % to -0.51 %). Bivariate evaluation showed NOAC superiority to warfarin overall and elucidated dose differences; low dose edoxaban increased bivariate TE-bleeding risk 0.08 % (CD = -0.85 % to 0.78 %), whereas high dose edoxaban reduced risk 1.41 % (CD = -2.07 % to -0.70 %). In conclusion, bivariate evaluation facilitates visual assessment of the safety-efficacy profile of antithrombotic drugs. Its application to trials in atrial fibrillation found NOACs superior to warfarin without substantial differences between agents.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Hemorrhage; Humans; Models, Statistical; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

In the coming decades, the number of Europeans with atrial fibrillation (AF) is set to rise as the population ages, and so with it will the number of strokes. The risk of thromboembolism (principally stroke and systemic embolism) and death can be reduced by the use of the vitamin K antagonists (VKA, e.g. warfarin) and more so by non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) such as edoxaban.. We modelled the effect of the increasing use of edoxaban in preference to warfarin in a European AF population from both clinical and economic perspectives. We estimate that the introduction of NOACs in 2010 eliminated over 88 000 thromboembolisms and deaths annually, of which over 17 000 were ischaemic strokes. At a 1-year cost of €30k per ischaemic stroke, this strategy saved €510 million annually. Should the use of edoxaban increase from 11% in 2013 to 75% by 2030, we expect that rate of thromboembolism and death will fall from 5.67 to 5.42 total events per million patients per year, which will further eliminate over 12 000 of these events annually. At an inflation-adjusted 1-year cost of approximately €35k per ischaemic stroke, this will save €44.5 million each year. At a conservative rate of increase in the AF population of 2.2-fold from 2005, in 2050 there will be around 180 000 AF-related ischaemic strokes that, at an inflation-adjusted cost of around €62k per stroke, sums to €11 116 million. Should the rate of AF rise 2.6-fold from 2005, then in 2050 there will be 214 500 ischaemic strokes that will cost around €13 300 million.. Our data point to a substantial increase in the human and economic cost burden of AF and so emphasize the need to reduce this burden. This may be achieved by the increased use of oral anticoagulants, particularly with the NOACs such as edoxaban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost Savings; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Europe; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Forecasting; Humans; Models, Economic; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Drug Substitution; Half-Life; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney Function Tests; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Approval; Germany; Humans; National Health Programs; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

The direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran, as well as the direct factor Xa inhibtors rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, display pharmacodynamic features quite similar to low-molecular-weight heparins, with a time to peak level of 1-4 hours after oral administration, and a half-life between 5 and 14 hours. All drugs display a linear relationship and a high degree of correlation between drug levels in plasma, and the anticoagulant effect. Major differences are the extent of renal elimination (with 80% or more for dabigatran, 66% for rivaroxaban [33% unchanged, active drug, and 33% inactive metabolites], 33% for edoxaban, and finally, 25% for apixaban), and bioavailability, which determines the amount of drug required for attaining the target plasma concentration of the drug. Due to the reliable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, no routine laboratory monitoring is necessary, although dedicated laboratory assays are available for emergencies and some other specific conditions.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Half-Life; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism

Edoxaban is a novel, potent and orally active direct Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor under development for prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic diseases. Properties of dose response and margin of safety of anticoagulants are the key factors for a positive risk/benefit of novel oral anticoagulants.. To compare the dose response of antithrombotic effect and margin of safety between antithrombotic and hemorrhagic effects of edoxaban with conventional anticoagulants, unfractionated heparin (UFH), dalteparin (low molecular weight heparin), lepirudin, and warfarin in rat models of thrombosis and hemorrhage.. Rats were treated with edoxaban, UFH, dalteparin, and lepirudin by continuous intravenous (iv) infusion, or with oral warfarin for 4 days before inducing thrombosis or bleeding. Thrombosis was induced by inserting a platinum wire into the inferior vena cava for 60 minutes. Tail template bleeding time was measured after making an incision on the tail.. In rats, iv infusion of edoxaban inhibited venous thrombosis in a dose-dependent manner. The other anticoagulants also exerted dose-dependent antithrombotic effects. The slopes of the dose-response curves of edoxaban were significantly shallower than the slopes of UFH, dalteparin, and warfarin. At supratherapeutic doses, edoxaban prolonged bleeding time in a rat tail bleeding model. To determine bleeding risk, the margins between antithrombotic and bleeding-time prolongation were compared. The margins of safety of edoxaban were wider than those of UFH, dalteparin, lepirudin, and warfarin.. These results suggest that edoxaban may be more easily controlled and has the potential for a more positive risk/benefit ratio compared to conventional anticoagulants.

Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heparin; Hirudins; Male; Pyridines; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Recombinant Proteins; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Acenocoumarol; Anticoagulants; Benzamides; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Heparin; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Thrombosis; Warfarin