edoxaban and Chemical-and-Drug-Induced-Liver-Injury

Efficacy and safety of dronedarone was shown in the ATHENA trial for paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Further trials revealed safety concerns in patients with heart failure and permanent AF. This review summarizes insights from recent real-world studies and meta-analyses, including reports on efficacy, with focus on liver safety, mortality risk in patients with paroxysmal/persistent AF, and interactions of dronedarone with direct oral anticoagulants. Reports of rapidly progressing liver failure in dronedarone-prescribed patients in 2011 led to regulatory cautions about potential liver toxicity. Recent real-world evidence suggests dronedarone liver safety profile is similar to other antiarrhythmics and liver toxicity could be equally common with many Class III antiarrhythmics. Dronedarone safety concerns (increased mortality in patients with permanent AF) were raised based on randomized controlled trials (RCT) (ANDROMEDA and PALLAS), but comedication with digoxin may have increased the mortality rates in PALLAS, considering the dronedarone-digoxin pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction. Real-world data on apixaban-dronedarone interactions and edoxaban RCT observations suggest no significant safety risks for these drug combinations. Median trough plasma concentrations of dabigatran 110 mg during concomitant use with dronedarone are at acceptable levels, while PK data on the rivaroxaban-dronedarone interaction are unavailable. In RCTs and real-world studies, dronedarone significantly reduces AF burden and cardiovascular hospitalizations, and demonstrates a low risk for proarrhythmia in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF. The concerns on liver safety must be balanced against the significant reduction in hospitalizations in patients with non-permanent AF and low risk for proarrhythmias following dronedarone treatment.

Topics: Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Dabigatran; Digoxin; Dronedarone; Drug Interactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Mortality; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thiazoles

Case reports and analyses of clinical studies and of pharmacovigilance data suggest that new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are associated with a small risk for hepatotoxicity. The objective of this publication is to summarize the current data about this subject, with a special emphasis on pharmacovigilance data in the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSR) database and on potential mechanisms of hepatotoxicity. For that, all available case reports as well as published analyses of clinical studies were obtained with a detailed search in PubMed. In addition, pharmacovigilance data from VigiBase(®), the WHO Global ICRS database, were extracted and analyzed. The data show that liver injury associated with NOACs was reported in clinical studies and in pharmacovigilance databases. Several case reports described potentially life-threatening hepatotoxicity in patients treated with rivaroxaban or dabigatran. For rivaroxaban, most affected patients were symptomatic and liver injury was most often hepatocellular or mixed. The frequency was between 0.1 and 1 % in clinical studies and was by trend lower than for comparators (mostly enoxaparin or warfarin). Comparing the pharmacovigilance reports for the individual NOACs, more hepatic adverse events were reported for rivaroxaban than for dabigatran or apixaban. With the exception of edoxaban, for which only few reports are available, patients with acute liver failure have been reported for every NOAC, but most patients had concomitant drugs or diseases. So far, there are no clear mechanisms explaining the hepatotoxicity of these drugs. We conclude that hepatotoxicity appears to be associated with all NOACs currently on the market. Hepatotoxicity associated with NOACs is idiosyncratic; it appears at therapeutic doses, is rare and the mechanism is not related to the pharmacological action of these drugs. Prescribers should inform patients about possible symptoms of hepatotoxicity and stop these drugs in patients presenting with severe liver injury.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles

Thromboembolism is a major complication of nephrotic syndrome, with the renal vein being the most frequent site. However, the incidence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with nephrotic syndrome is rare. We report a case of a relapsed steroid-dependent minimal change disease with incidental PVT. A 38-year-old man presented with anasarca. Elevated liver enzymes were discovered during routine blood testing within days after commencing treatment. Although drug-induced liver injuries are frequently observed with mild aminotransferase abnormality during therapy with steroid or immune-suppressive agents, imaging revealed a massive thrombus of the portal vein, which was treated by anticoagulant therapy with edoxaban. Treatment with anticoagulant therapy could normalize liver function. Two months after the initiation of treatment with edoxaban, the follow-up CT scan and ultrasound showed the disappearance of PVT. Our case suggests that much attention should be paid to PVT as a cause of liver enzyme elevation when treating patients with nephrotic syndrome.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Nephrotic Syndrome; Portal Vein; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin