dynorphins and Paralysis

Morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) administered centrally produces dose-dependent neuro-excitatory behaviours in rodents via a predominantly non-opioid mechanism. The endogenous opioid peptide, dynorphin A (Dyn A) (1-17), is rapidly cleaved in vivo to the relatively more stable fragment Dyn A(2-17) which also produces excitatory behaviours in rodents via a non-opioid mechanism. This study investigated the possible contribution of Dyn A(2-17) to the neuro-excitatory behaviours evoked by supraspinally and spinally administered M3G in male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. Marked qualitative differences in behaviours were apparent following administration of M3G and Dyn A(2-17). Administration of 11 nmol i.c.v. doses of M3G produced intermittent myoclonic jerks, tonic-clonic convulsions, and ataxia, as well as postural changes, whereas i.c.v. Dyn A(2-17) at 15 nmol produced effects on body posture alone. Administration of 11 nmol i.t. doses of M3G produced intermittent explosive motor activity, and touch-evoked agitation, as well as postural changes, whereas i.t. Dyn A(2-17) at 15 nmol produced postural changes, touch-evoked agitation, and paralysis. Pre-treatment with Dyn A antiserum (200 microg) markedly attenuated total behavioural excitation following i.c.v. and i.t. administration of Dyn A(2-17) by approximately 94% and 78%, respectively. However, total behavioural excitation following i.c.v. and i.t. administration of M3G was less markedly attenuated (both approximately 27%) by pre-treatment with Dyn A antiserum, with reductions in tonic-clonic convulsions ( approximately 43%), explosive motor behaviour ( approximately 28%), and touch-evoked agitation ( approximately 22%). The present findings discount a major role for Dyn A in mediating the neuro-excitatory effects of M3G, although it may contribute to maintaining some individual neuro-excitatory behaviours.

Topics: Animals; Area Under Curve; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Dynorphins; Injections, Intraventricular; Injections, Spinal; Male; Morphine Derivatives; Motor Activity; Paralysis; Peptide Fragments; Posture; Psychomotor Agitation; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley

Prodynorphin-derived peptides elicit various pathological effects including neurological dysfunction and cell death. These actions are reduced by N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) but not opioid receptor antagonists suggesting NMDAR-mediation. Here, we show that a conserved epitope (KVNSEEEEEDA) of the NR1 subunit of the NMDAR binds dynorphin peptides (DYNp) noncovalently. Synthetic peptides containing this epitope form stable complexes with DYNp and prevent the potentiation of NMDAR-gated currents produced by DYNp. They attenuate DYNp-evoked cell death in spinal cord and prevent, as well as reverse, DYNp-induced paralysis and allodynia. The data reveal a novel mechanism whereby prodynorphin-derived peptides facilitate NMDAR function and produce neurotoxicity. Furthermore, they suggest that synthetic peptides that bind DYNp, thus preventing their interaction with NMDAR, may be novel therapeutic agents for the treatment of spinal cord injury.

Topics: Amino Acid Sequence; Animals; Apoptosis; Behavior, Animal; Cells, Cultured; Conserved Sequence; Dynorphins; Electrophysiology; Female; Ganglia, Spinal; Immunohistochemistry; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred ICR; Microinjections; Models, Molecular; Molecular Sequence Data; Neuroprotective Agents; Neurotoxicity Syndromes; Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular; Oocytes; Paralysis; Peptides; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate; RNA, Messenger; Spinal Cord; Time Factors; Xenopus

Intrathecal(i.t.) injection of 10 microliters of dynorphin A(1-17) 20 nmol.L-1 per rat resulted in irreversible hind limb paralysis and suppression of the tail-flick reflex lasting for up to 40 h. The dual effects of dynorphin appeared 5-10 min after the i.t. administration. Histologic examination of the spinal cord in the rats demonstrated dead and/or dying and degenerated motor-neurons in the ventral horn located predominately in the lumbar segment(a 87.2% reduction of the number of motor neurons, P < 0.01) and also in a lesser degree in sacral segment(-69.6%, P < 0.05). The thoracic segment was essentially normal(-8.2%, P > 0.05).

Topics: Animals; Dynorphins; Hindlimb; Injections, Spinal; Male; Motor Neurons; Paralysis; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Spinal Cord

The effect of intrathecal injection of dynorphin A (1-17) on second messenger systems of spinal cord relative to behavioral change in rats was studied. Dynorphin A (1-17) 5, 10 (20 nmol) caused dose-dependent flaccid paralysis of hindlimbs. Dynorphin A (1-17) 10, 20 nmol dose-dependently decreased spinal adenylate cyclase (AC) activity, cyclic AMP production, calmodulin (CaM) level and cyclic-nucleotide phosphodiesterase (PDE) activity 10 min after intrathecal injection. They recovered to a varying extent two hours later. Pretreatment with selective kappa-opioid receptor antagonist nor-BNI 30 nmol 10 min before dynorphin A (1-17) markedly antagonized the effects of dynorphin A (1-17) at 20 nmol on hindlimb paralysis and inhibition of intracellular second messengers. The L-type calcium channel blocker verapamil (100 nmol) also played a role in blocking dynorphin neurotoxicity. The NMDA receptor antagonist APV could partially or completely block dynorphin inhibition of CaM level and PDE activity without affecting paralysis and decrease of AC-cAMP level induced by dynorphin A (1-17) 10 min after intrathecal injection.

Topics: 3',5'-Cyclic-AMP Phosphodiesterases; Animals; Calmodulin; Cyclic AMP; Dynorphins; Female; Injections, Spinal; Motor Activity; Muscle Hypotonia; Paralysis; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Second Messenger Systems; Spinal Cord

Intrathecal injection of dynorphin A produced dual effects on sensory and motor functions in the spinal cord of the rat. At a dose of 5 nmol, dynorphin A produced an increase in tail flick latency (TFL) as well as a reversible motor paralysis as assessed by change in the angle of inclined plane. At a dose of 10 or 20 nmol, dynorphin produced a motor paralysis lasting for up to 24 hours. The effect of dynorphin A on the sensory function of the spinal cord was shown by an increase in the vocalization threshold induced by electrical stimulation of the tail, at dose range of 1.25-10 nmol, with a quick onset (5 min) and relatively short duration (within 60 min). Unlike tail flick reaction which involves spinal motor function, tail stimulation-induced vocalization threshold is a relatively pure index for spinal nociceptive activities. The differential effect of dynorphin on sensory and motor function was supported by the evidence that (1) dynorphin-induced analgesic effect (increase in vocalization threshold) was naloxone reversible, whereas dynorphin-induced motor paralysis was naloxone resistant. (2) Nor-BNI, a specific antagonist for kappa opioid receptor, blocked the sensory effect of dynorphin, but had no influence on motor effect of dynorphin. It is thus concluded that dynorphin has both analgesic and paralytic effects in spinal cord. The analgesia shown by an increase of vocalization threshold is an opioid effect, most probably mediated by kappa opioid receptor; the paralytic effect, however, is a non-opioid effect. The increase of TFL induced by dynorphin involves both sensory (analgesia) and motor (paralysis) effects.

Topics: Analgesics; Animals; Dynorphins; Injections, Spinal; Male; Naloxone; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Pain Measurement; Pain Threshold; Paralysis; Psychomotor Performance; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Reaction Time; Spinal Cord; Vocalization, Animal

Lumbar subarachnoid injection of dynorphin A causes an ischemia-induced neuronal degeneration and persistent hindlimb paralysis. The protective effects of a variety of competitive and non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists indicate that activation of the NMDA receptor complex is essential for dynorphin A-induced spinal cord injury. 1-Aminocyclopropanecarboxylic acid (ACPC) is a high affinity, partial agonist at strychnine-insensitive glycine receptors associated with the NMDA receptor complex. Pretreatment of rats with ACPC (100 and 200 mg/kg, i.p., 30 min prior to dynorphin A) significantly eliminated the persistent hindlimb motor deficits and neuropathological changes produced by 20 nmol of this peptide. The neuroprotective effects of ACPC (100 mg/kg, i.p.) were abolished by parenteral administration of glycine (800 mg/kg, 30 min prior to ACPC), consistent with other in vivo and in vitro studies indicating that the pharmacological actions of ACPC are effected through strychnine-insensitive glycine receptors. When given instead as six daily injections (200 mg/kg, i.p.) followed by an injection-free day, ACPC also significantly improved neurological recovery following dynorphin-A injection. These results support earlier indications that: (1) activation of the NMDA receptor complex plays a critical role in mediating dynorphin A-induced rat spinal cord injury; (2) ACPC provides an effective means of antagonizing excitotoxic phenomena; and (3) chronic administration of ACPC can elicit a persistent change in the NMDA receptor complex.

Topics: Amino Acids; Amino Acids, Cyclic; Animals; Dynorphins; Hindlimb; Injections; Male; Paralysis; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate; Spinal Cord Diseases; Subarachnoid Space

Dynorphin A (1-13) or dynorphin A (1-17) administered intrathecally to rats induces a dose-dependent loss of the tail-flick reflex and a reversible hindlimb paralysis. Although their potency is comparable, dynorphin A (1-17) is less efficacious in producing loss of the tail-flick reflex. These data suggest that dynorphin A (1-17) acts as a partial agonist or exerts its neurotoxic effect in the presence of an endogenous non-competitive inhibitor. To determine whether these substances act at similar sites we performed isobolographic analysis. This analysis revealed that dose-additivity exists for paralysis whereas deviation from dose-additivity exists for loss of the tail-flick reflex.

Topics: Analgesics; Animals; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Synergism; Dynorphins; Injections, Spinal; Male; Pain Measurement; Paralysis; Peptide Fragments; Postural Balance; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Reaction Time

Selective antagonists of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) excitatory amino acid (EAA) receptors have been shown to protect against dynorphin-A (DYN)-induced paralysis and neurotoxicity in the spinal cord. To test the hypothesis that either DYN-induced paralysis or neurotoxicity involves an enhanced release of EAAs, we used microdialysis to monitor aspartate (Asp) and glutamate (Glu) release in both the lumbar spinal cord extracellular fluid (ECF) and the spinal cord cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) of conscious rats in response to DYN (1-13). Injection of 5 nmol of DYN produced temporary paralysis in 8 of 10 animals, but did not significantly change Asp or Glu release in either the ECF or the CSF. Injection of 20 nmol of DYN caused permanent paralysis and neuronal cell loss in all animals tested as well as a significant increase of Asp and Glu in both the ECF and the CSF, and a decrease in glutamine (Gln) release only in the ECF. Pretreatment with 1 mg/kg of the NMDA antagonist MK-801 blocked both paralysis and amino acid changes in the ECF. Pretreatment of animals with 5 mg/kg naloxone inhibited glutamate release in the ECF, but did not block paralysis, Asp release or inhibition of Gln release. As MK-801 sensitive paralysis by DYN was not mediated through enhanced EAA release, we examined whether DYN could act through postsynaptic facilitation of NMDA receptors by testing the ability of DYN to alter the magnitude of a behavioral response produced by intrathecal injection of NMDA in mice.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Topics: Animals; Aspartic Acid; Behavior, Animal; Cell Death; Dizocilpine Maleate; Dynorphins; Glutamates; Glutamic Acid; Male; N-Methylaspartate; Neurons; Paralysis; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Spinal Cord

Dynorphin A(1-13) administered intrathecally to rats induces a reversible hindlimb paralysis and permanent loss of the tail-flick reflex in a dose-dependent and all-or-none manner. The loss of the tail-flick reflex has been determined to result from neurotoxicity linked to the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor. Recently, it has been reported that NMDA antagonists attenuate irreversible paralysis induced by dynorphin A(1-17) and dynorphin A(2-17). In the present studies, we examined whether repeated injections of dynorphin A(1-13) acetate salt could change the characteristics of the reversible paralysis. Injections repeated every 48 h resulted in hindlimb paralysis upon each injection which was not different in terms of magnitude or duration (P greater than 0.60). Injections repeated at 2 h intervals resulted in desensitization of the paralytic effects (P less than 0.05). We also examined if strychnine sulfate, a glycine antagonist would alter the paralytic response to dynorphin. Strychnine protected rats from paralysis (P less than 0.01) and loss of the tail-flick reflex with an ED50 of 7 nmol. We conclude that the reversible paralysis induced by dynorphin A(1-13) is repeatable which suggests that the paralysis results from nontoxic or subtoxic actions of dynorphin. Desensitization to the paralytic effects occurs with closely spaced injections by some unknown mechanism. In addition, we conclude that the spinal glycinergic inhibitory system may participate in the induction of the paralysis because strychnine antagonizes dynorphin-induced paralysis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Topics: Animals; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Dynorphins; Male; Narcotics; Paralysis; Peptide Fragments; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Reaction Time; Reflex; Strychnine

It has been proposed that the endogenous opioid dynorphin A (Dyn A) contributes to the pathogenesis of posttraumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). Dyn A-related peptides given intrathecally (i.t.) produce hindlimb paralysis. These include Dyn A(1-17), Dyn A(1-13), Dyn A(2-17), and Dyn A(3-13). Because Dyn A(2-17) and Dyn A(3-13) are inactive at opiate receptors, Dyn A-induced paralysis may include a non-opioid component. Recently, it has been reported that competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists block the loss of tail-flick reflex caused by i.t. administration of Dyn A(1-13). In the present studies we examined whether competitive [(4-[3-phosphonopropyl]-2-piperazine-carboxylic acid (CPP)] or non-competitive (dextrorphan) NMDA antagonists could attenuate paralysis induced by Dyn A(1-17) or Dyn A(2-17). CPP or dextrorphan each significantly attenuated the neurologic dysfunction and mortality associated with Dyn A(1-17) administration. In addition, CPP and dextrorphan significantly reduced the neurologic dysfunction caused by Dyn A(2-17)(all P less than 0.05). From these data we suggest that the non-opioid component of Dyn A-induced paralysis is mediated in part by the NMDA receptor.

Topics: Animals; Binding, Competitive; Dextrorphan; Dynorphins; Hindlimb; Male; Morphinans; Paralysis; Peptide Fragments; Piperazines; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate; Receptors, Neurotransmitter

Intrathecal (i.t.) administration of the opioid dynorphin causes neurological dysfunction and tissue damage. It has been suggested that these effects of dynorphin may be mediated, in part, by N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. In the present studies, recently developed compounds that block the glycine potentiation site of the NMDA receptor (Gly-NMDA site), including the competitive antagonist 5-fluoro-indole-2-carboxylic acid and the non-competitive antagonist 7-chlorokynurenic acid, prevented the neurologic deficits and mortality caused by i.t. dynorphin A(1-17). These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that dynorphin-induced neurological dysfunction involves activation of NMDA receptors. Moreover, blockade of the Gly-NMDA site may provide an alternative to blockade of the glutamate binding site or NMDA receptor ion channel as an in vivo pharmacological strategy to treat conditions previously associated with excitotoxin mediated tissue injury.

Topics: Animals; Dynorphins; Glycine; Indoles; Injections, Spinal; Kynurenic Acid; Male; Paralysis; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate; Receptors, Neurotransmitter

Intrathecally injected dynorphin A (1-13) in rats results in a reversible hindlimb paralysis and an irreversible loss of the tail-flick reflex. Histologic examination of the spinal cords of dynorphin treated rats demonstrated dead and/or dying neurons predominately localized in the central area which approximates Rexed lamina VII and X. In this area a maximum effect of the dynorphin-induced neurotoxicity is evident. Thus, the dynorphin-induced neuron death is suggestive of an anatomical selectivity.

Topics: Animals; Cell Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Dynorphins; Male; Neurons; Pain; Paralysis; Peptide Fragments; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Reflex; Spinal Cord Diseases

The selective kappa opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI) was used to distinguish a kappa opioid component in the mechanisms underlying the hindlimb paralysis, ischemia, and neuronal injury induced in the rat by the kappa opioid agonist dynorphin A. Spinal intrathecal (i.t.) injection of nor-BNI (20 nmol) either 15 min or immediately before i.t. injections of 5 or 20 nmol of dynorphin A failed to alter the dynorphin A-induced disruption of hindlimb motor function and nociceptive responsiveness. Nor-BNI also did not change the 3-fold increases in cerebrospinal fluid lactate concentrations produced by 20 nmol of dynorphin A. Neuroanatomical evaluations revealed that the cell loss, fiber degeneration, and central gray necrosis in lumbosacral spinal cords of rats treated with 20 nmol of dynorphin A were not altered by nor-BNI (20 nmol, i.t.). Thus, the spinal cord injury and associated neurological deficits resulting from i.t. injection of dynorphin A appear to be primarily, if not totally, attributable to its non-kappa opioid action(s).

Topics: Animals; Atrophy; Dynorphins; Hindlimb; Ischemia; Male; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Paralysis; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Receptors, Opioid; Receptors, Opioid, kappa; Spinal Cord Diseases

Thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH), which has been shown to improve neurologic recovery following cervical contusive spinal injury in cats, has also recently been reported to prevent the neuronal damage produced by the intrathecal (i.t.) administration of the substance P antagonist, spantide. Spantide and other substance P antagonists share with dynorphin A (DYN A)-related peptides the ability to produce an acute hindlimb paralysis after i.t. administration in the rat. By virtue of this effect, DYN A has been implicated in the secondary injury mechanisms that follow spinal trauma. Since TRH was shown to reduce the degree of histopathological injury caused by i.t. spantide, we investigated the ability of TRH to prevent or ameliorate the acute hindlimb paralysis produced by the i.t. injection of the substance P antagonists, (D-Arg1,D-Trp7,9,Leu11)-substance P (spantide) and (D-Arg1,D-Pro2,D-Trp7,9,Leu11)-substance P, and DYN A in rats. In this study, TRH failed to improve motor function or survival following i.t. injections of substance P antagonists or DYN A.

Topics: Animals; Dynorphins; Hindlimb; Male; Movement; Muscles; Paralysis; Peptide Fragments; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Recombinant Proteins; Substance P; Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone

In rats, the spinal subarachnoid injection of the kappa opioid agonist Dynorphin A (Dyn A)(1-13) and the delta opioid receptor antagonist ICI 174864 produced dose-related flaccid paralysis of hindlimbs and tail that were influenced appreciably by injection procedures. When injected through indwelling intrathecal (i.t.) catheters terminating at L1 to L2, both peptides were significantly more potent producing paralysis 1 day, rather than 10 to 14 days, after i.t. catheterization. Other rats received direct subarachnoid injections of these peptides through 30-gauge needles placed in the L4 to L5 intervertebral space. In naive, uncatheterized and acutely catheterized rats, direct intervertebral injection of these peptides, as well as D-Ala2-Dyn A (1-13) amide (a metabolically stable analog of Dyn A (1-13), produced hindlimb paralysis with potencies comparable to those recorded after injections through acutely implanted catheters. In contrast, chronically catheterized rats showed significantly reduced responsivity to direct intervertebral injections of all three of these peptides. Loss of hindlimb motor function was associated with loss of nociceptive responsiveness. Elevations in tail-flick latencies were only seen with doses of Dyn A (1-13) which produced motor dysfunction, and were not blocked or reversed by high doses of the opioid antagonist naloxone. These results indicate that: 1) indwelling i.t. catheters induce spinal cord alterations which complicate their experimental usefulness, 2) Dyn A (1-13) does not alter responsiveness to thermal nociceptive stimuli through opioid mechanism and 3) Dyn A (1-13) causes parallel disruptions of spinal cord motor and nociceptive function.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Topics: Animals; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Dynorphins; Enkephalin, Leucine; Hindlimb; Injections, Spinal; Male; Motor Activity; Nociceptors; Paralysis; Peptide Fragments; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Spinal Cord

The kappa opioid agonist dynorphin A (Dyn A) (1-13) produced dose-related neurological deficits after subarachnoid injection in the lumbar spinal cords of rats. Whereas the neurological dysfunctions produced by low doses of Dyn A (1-13) were transient, higher doses caused persistent deficits, characterized by motor and nociceptive impairment in hindlimbs and tail, hindlimb edema, priapism, bladder infarction and atony and urinary incontinence. These deficits appeared to result from nonopioid actions of Dyn A (1-13), as they were: 1) not blocked by the opioid antagonists naloxone or WIN 44,441-3; 2) shared by Dyn A (3-13), which lacks opioid activity; and 3) not produced or altered by the selective kappa opioid agonist U 50,488. Coinjection of a combination of peptidase inhibitors, shown previously to enhance the actions of Dyn A fragments in vitro, significantly increased the paralytic actions of Dyn A (1-13). The peptidase inhibitors did not by themselves cause neurological dysfunction, and they did not alter the paralytic potency of the peptidase-resistant delta opioid antagonist ICI 174864. These findings indicate that Dyn A effects were: 1) limited appreciably by its rapid enzymatic degradation after injection and 2) most likely the result of actions of the intact peptide rather than proteolytic products generated after injection. Neuroanatomical evaluations revealed extensive neuronal and axonal injury in the lumbosacral spinal cords of rats injected with 25 nmol of Dyn A (1-13). Collectively, these results indicate that Dyn A (1-13) acts through nonopioid mechanisms to cause the injury and death of neurons involved in diverse spinal cord functions.

Topics: Animals; Autonomic Nervous System; Dynorphins; Injections, Spinal; Male; Motor Activity; Nociceptors; Paralysis; Peptide Fragments; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Spinal Cord

Dynorphin A-(1-17) acts through non-opioid mechanisms to produce dose-related neurological deficits following injection into the lumbar spinal subarachnoid space in rats. Hindlimb motor function was examined following subarachnoid injection of dynorphin A fragments and other opioid peptides derived from prodynorphin to establish: (1) which portion(s) of the dynorphin A molecule cause hindlimb motor dysfunction, and (2) whether these paralytic actions are shared by other opioids (dynorphin B, alpha-neo-endorphin, and beta-neo-endorphin) derived from the same promolecule. To minimize the influence of enzymatic inactivation on relative bioactivities, peptides were coinjected with a combination of peptidase inhibitors previously shown to enhance the actions of dynorphin A fragments in vitro. Dynorphin A-(1-17) and -(2-17) produced dose-related neurological deficits with equal potencies and durations. Although without effect when injected alone, dynorphin A-(1-8), -(1-7) and -(3-8) caused transient motor dysfunction when co-injected with peptidase inhibitors. In contrast, dynorphin A-(1-6), -(1-5) and -(6-17) did not disrupt hindlimb motor function with or without peptidase inhibition. Dynorphin B, alpha-neo-endorphin and beta-neo-endorphin also caused hindlimb dysfunction which was potentiated by peptidase inhibition. These deficits appeared to result from non-opioid actions of these three peptides, since they were not blocked by the opioid antagonist naloxone. Thus, the paralytic effects of dynorphin A: (1) result from non-opioid actions involving the 3-7 or 3-8 positions of the molecule, and (2) are shared by other prodynorphin-derived opioid peptides.

Topics: Animals; Dynorphins; Hindlimb; Injections; Male; Naloxone; Paralysis; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Spinal Cord; Subarachnoid Space

The delta opioid receptor antagonist ICI 174864 produces postural abnormalities and barrel rolling after i.c.v. injection and hindlimb and tail flaccidity after spinal subarachnoid injection in rats. These effects appear to result from nonopioid characteristics of ICI 174864 because they are neither shared nor blocked by other opioid antagonists (naloxone, ICI 154129 and WIN 44,441-3) and are produced by two compounds (ICI 174644 and ICI 178173) that are structurally related to ICI 174864 but lack its delta antagonist properties. Barrel rolling and hindlimb paralysis are also produced by dynorphin A-related peptides; however, rats failed to demonstrate tolerance or cross-tolerance to the hindlimb paralytic actions of ICI 174864 or dynorphin A (1-13) after 7 days of continuous spinal intrathecal infusion of either of these compounds. Whereas hindlimb responses to low doses of ICI 174864 (1.6-6.2 nmol intrathecally) were usually transient, higher doses (6.2-25 nmol intrathecally) produced persistent hindlimb motor dysfunction, altered nociception, priapism, hindlimb edema, bladder infarction and atony and urinary incontinence. Neuronal and axonal changes in the lumbosacral spinal cords of rats with persistent and transient neurologic deficits provided direct evidence of the neuropathologic actions of ICI 174864 (3.1 and 6.2 nmol) and ICI 174644 (25 nmol). These results indicate that 1) use of ICI 174864 as a selective delta opioid receptor antagonist is potentially compromised by its nonopioid neuropathologic actions and 2) ICI 174864 and dynorphin A-related peptides are unique among opioid agonists and antagonists in sharing barrel rolling and hindlimb paralytic effects. A similar mechanism of action may underlie the shared nonopioid actions of these peptides.

Topics: Animals; Drug Tolerance; Dynorphins; Enkephalin, Leucine; Male; Narcotic Antagonists; Neurons; Paralysis; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Receptors, Opioid; Receptors, Opioid, delta; Spinal Cord

Intrathecal administration of dynorphin A in rats produced dose-dependent antinociceptive effects in the tail-flick test to radiant heat and on a limb-flexion test to pressure. The potency of dynorphin A as an analgesic agent on the tail-flick test was dependent upon the duration of cannula implantation. When a short-term procedure was used (drug injected 1 day after catheter implantation) dynorphin A was approximately equipotent to morphine, whereas in animals with long-term implants (drug injected 7 or more days after catheter implantation) dynorphin A was an order of magnitude less potent than morphine. [D-Ala2,D-Leu5]enkephalin was the most potent opioid tested, and in the tail-flick test (long-term procedure) it was about 2 orders of magnitude more potent than dynorphin A and 7 times more potent than morphine. [Leu]enkephalin had no detectable antinociceptive effects. Low doses of naloxone (1 and 2 mg/kg s.c.) completely blocked the antinociceptive effects of morphine and [D-Ala2,D-Leu5]enkephalin, but neither low nor high (40 mg/kg s.c.) doses clearly blocked the antinociceptive effects of dynorphin A. Thus, dynorphin A has an antinociceptive action at the level of the spinal cord, and mu opioid receptors do not mediate these effects. In addition, high doses of dynorphin A (20 nmol or greater) produced long-lasting hindlimb paralysis, which suggests that dynorphin peptides may play a role in motor function in the spinal cord. This paralytic action of dynorphin A was not antagonized by naloxone in doses up to 32 mg/kg s.c.

Topics: Animals; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Dynorphins; Enkephalin, Leucine; Enkephalin, Leucine-2-Alanine; Male; Morphine; Motor Activity; Naloxone; Nociceptors; Paralysis; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains

We compared effects on motor function of four peptides belonging to the dynorphin family--dynorphin-(1-17) (DYN-(1-17], dynorphin-(1-13) (DYN-(1-13], dynorphin-(1-8) (DYN-(1-8] and alpha-neo-endorphin (alpha NE). After intrathecal administration, each of these peptides produced dose-related, flaccid, hindlimb paralysis, with the order of potency being DYN-(1-17) greater than DYN-(1-13) greater than alpha NE congruent to DYN-(1-8). This motor dysfunction was not reversed or blocked by the opiate receptor antagonist naloxone and was not produced by a variety of other kappa-selective agonists. However, paralysis was produced by des-Tyr-dynorphin (DYN-(2-17], which does not act at the opioid receptor. Taken together, the present studies show that dynorphin-related peptides, uniquely amongst opioids, produce motor dysfunction, an action which does not appear to be mediated by opioid receptors.

Topics: Animals; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Dynorphins; Endorphins; Male; Motor Activity; Naloxone; Paralysis; Peptide Fragments; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Receptors, Opioid