dorzolamide-timolol-combination and Ocular-Hypertension

Topically administered dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% (dorzolamide/timolol ophthalmic solution; Cosopt) is a fixed combination of two ocular hypotensive drugs (the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor dorzolamide and the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist timolol) that have an additive effect on lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) when administered together. This product is indicated for the treatment of elevated IOP in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension (OH) who are insufficiently responsive to topical beta-adrenoceptor antagonist monotherapy. As such, it can be considered for use in individuals who, as a consequence of failing to achieve target IOP with beta-adrenoceptor antagonist monotherapy, require the addition or substitution of another class of topical antiglaucoma medication. Clinical trials have demonstrated that dorzolamide/timolol (1 drop per eye twice daily) is an effective and generally well tolerated fixed combination for lowering IOP in patients with open angle glaucoma or OH, including individuals uncontrolled on beta-adrenoceptor antagonist monotherapy. Compared with concomitant therapy with the individual components, the primary advantage of fixed combination dorzolamide/timolol is convenience.

Topics: Drug Combinations; Glaucoma; Humans; Ocular Hypertension; Ophthalmic Solutions; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Timolol; Vision, Ocular

To compare the additive effects and safety of 1% brinzolamide/0.5% timolol fixed combination (BTFC) versus the low-dose regimen of 1% dorzolamide/0.5% timolol fixed combination (DTFC) in patients with open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension (OAG/OH) following treatment with prostaglandin analogues (PGAs).. A prospective, randomized, double-masked, multicentre, parallel-group and active-controlled study included 201 Japanese OAG/OH patients who had been treated with PGA. Efficacy was assessed as the change in intra-ocular pressure (IOP) from baseline after weeks 4 and 8. Safety was assessed with adverse event rates, ocular discomfort score, blur scale, blood pressure and heart rates, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and slit lamp examinations.. Intra-ocular pressure (IOP) change from baseline at 9 AM/11 AM pooled over the 8 weeks was -3.3/-3.3 mmHg in the BTFC group and -2.9/-3.4 mmHg in the DTFC group, demonstrating non-inferiority of BTFC to DTFC. Ocular irritation was frequently seen in DTFC group. Although blurred vision was frequently seen in BTFC group, it was transient and blurring became the equivalent 3 min after instillation between two groups. No noteworthy issue was observed in other safety outcome.. Non-inferiority of BTFC to DTFC in IOP reduction was demonstrated after adding onto PGA therapy in Japanese OAG/OH patients. Although the score of blurred vision was transiently higher in BTFC than DTFC, treatment difference decreased and disappeared with time. Thus, BTFC can be considered as a safe and effective agent for glaucoma treatment.

Topics: Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Follow-Up Studies; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Intraocular Pressure; Ocular Hypertension; Ophthalmic Solutions; Prospective Studies; Prostaglandins, Synthetic; Sulfonamides; Thiazines; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Timolol; Tonometry, Ocular; Treatment Outcome

To compare the efficiency of brinzolamide/brimonidine fixed combination vs the dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination.. Forty-four eyes of 44 patients were divided in 2 groups treated either with dorzolamide/timolol twice a day (group A) or with brinzolamide/brimonidine twice a day (group B). Complete ophthalmic examination including Goldmann applanation tonometry was performed before treatment administration and 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks afterwards. The intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured twice a day (morning at 9 AM and afternoon at 4 PM).. At the end of the follow-up period (12 weeks), mean morning IOP reduction was 7.0 ± 2.8 mm Hg in group A and 8.4 ± 1.9 mm Hg in group B. A significant difference was found (p = 0.0343). In contrast, mean afternoon IOP reduction was 8.6 ± 2.7 mm Hg in group A and 7.9 ± 1.6 mm Hg in group B and no significant difference was found (p = 0.3413). No significant adverse effects were observed in either group.. Brinzolamide/brimonidine seems to be an effective and safe alternative β-blocker free fixed combination, especially for patients with comorbidities, having its own antihypertensive profile.

Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Male; Middle Aged; Ocular Hypertension; Ophthalmic Solutions; Prospective Studies; Sulfonamides; Thiazines; Thiophenes; Timolol; Tonometry, Ocular; Treatment Outcome

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the 24-h efficacy, tolerability, and ocular surface health with preservative-free (PF) tafluprost and a PF triple drug regimen comprising tafluprost and dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination (DTFC) in open-angle glaucoma patients who were insufficiently controlled with preserved branded or generic latanoprost monotherapy and who exhibited signs or symptoms of ocular surface disease (OSD).. Prospective, observer-masked, crossover, comparison. Eligible consecutive open-angle glaucoma patients were randomized to either PF tafluprost or the triple PF regimen for 3 months. They were then crossed over to the opposite therapy for another 3 months. At the end of the latanoprost run-in period and after each PF treatment period, patients underwent habitual 24-h intraocular pressure (IOP) monitoring with Goldmann tonometry in the sitting position (at 10:00, 14:00, 18:00, and 22:00) and Perkins tonometry in the supine position (at 02:00 and 06:00). Tolerability and selected ocular surface parameters were evaluated at baseline and the end of each treatment period.. Forty-three open-angle glaucoma patients completed the trial. Mean 24-h IOP on preserved latanoprost was 22.2 ± 3.9 mmHg. Compared with latanoprost monotherapy, PF tafluprost obtained a greater reduction in mean, peak, and fluctuation of 24-h IOP including the 02:00 and 06:00 time points (P < 0.05). With the exception of 24-h fluctuation, the triple PF regimen provided significantly lower IOP parameters than latanoprost or PF tafluprost (P < 0.001). Finally, PF tafluprost therapy displayed significantly improved tear film break-up times (6.7 vs 6.0 s), corneal staining (1.3 vs 2.2), and Schirmer I test results (9.1 vs 8.2 mm) compared with the preserved latanoprost baseline (all P < 0.01). The triple PF regimen demonstrated similar tear film break-up times (6.1 vs 6.0 s) and Schirmer I test results (8.2 vs 8.2 mm) to latanoprost, but revealed a significant improvement in the corneal stain test (1.7 vs 2.2; P < 0.001).. In this trial PF tafluprost therapy provided statistically greater 24-h efficacy and improved tolerability compared with preserved latanoprost. The combination of PF tafluprost and PF dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination was statistically and clinically more efficacious than both monotherapies and demonstrated similar ocular surface characteristics to preserved latanoprost monotherapy.. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02802137).. Santen.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antihypertensive Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Latanoprost; Male; Middle Aged; Ocular Hypertension; Preservatives, Pharmaceutical; Prospective Studies; Prostaglandins F; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Timolol; Tonometry, Ocular; Treatment Outcome

To demonstrate that preoperative treatment for 28 days with topical dorzolamide/timolol is non-inferior (Δ = 4 mm Hg) to oral acetazolamide and topical dexamethasone (standard therapy) in terms of intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction 3 and 6 months after trabeculectomy in glaucoma patients.. Sixty-two eyes undergoing trabeculectomy with mitomycin C were included in this monocentric prospective randomized controlled study. IOP change between baseline and 3 months post-op was defined as the primary efficacy variable. Secondary efficacy variables included the number of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) injections, needlings, suture lyses, preoperative IOP change, hypertension rate and change of conjunctival redness 3 and 6 months post-op. Safety was assessed based on the documentation of adverse events.. Preoperative treatment with topical dorzolamide/timolol was non-inferior to oral acetazolamide and topical dexamethasone in terms of IOP reduction 3 months after trabeculectomy (adjusted means -8.12 mmHg versus -8.30 mmHg; Difference: 0.18; 95% CI -1.91 to 2.26, p = 0.8662). Similar results were found 6 months after trabeculectomy (-9.13 mmHg versus -9.06 mmHg; p = 0.9401). Comparable results were also shown for both groups concerning the classification of the filtering bleb, corneal staining, and numbers of treatments with 5-FU, needlings and suture lyses. More patients reported AEs in the acetazolamide/dexamethasone group than in the dorzolamide/timolol group.. Preoperative, preservative-free, fixed-dose dorzolamide/timolol seems to be equally effective as preoperative acetazolamide and dexamethasone and has a favourable safety profile.

Topics: Acetazolamide; Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Dexamethasone; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluorouracil; Glaucoma; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Male; Middle Aged; Ocular Hypertension; Ophthalmic Solutions; Preoperative Care; Prospective Studies; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Timolol; Trabeculectomy; Treatment Outcome

The study purpose was to evaluate preventive use of dorzolamide-timolol ophthalmic solution (Cosopt) during laparoscopic surgery with the patient in steep Trendelenburg (ST) position. Periorbital swelling, venous congestion, and elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) may produce low ocular perfusion. Prompt IOP reduction is important because 30- to 40-minute episodes of acute IOP elevations can result in retinal ganglion cell dysfunction. Dorzolamide-timolol ophthalmic drops reduce IOP and may ameliorate this effect. A double-blind randomized experimental study was conducted to test the effect of dorzolamide-timolol on IOP elevation during laparoscopic surgeries in ST position. Patients were randomly assigned to receive dorzolamide-timolol treatment or balanced salt solution following anesthesia induction. The IOP levels were measured at baseline and 30-minutes intervals throughout surgery. The generalized estimating equations model was used to analyze treatment and time effects and treatment by time interactions. Ninety patients were recruited, with 46 receiving dorzolamide-timolol treatment and 44 receiving balanced salt solution. Statistical analysis revealed significant treatment and time effects and treatment-time interactions on IOP. Patients' IOP was significantly lower in the treatment group than controls (P < .05 to P < .001). Treatment effects were medium to strong. Prophylactic therapy with dorzolamide-timolol significantly reduced IOP of surgical patients during ST positioning.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Pressure; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Eye; Female; Head-Down Tilt; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Intraoperative Complications; Laparoscopy; Male; Middle Aged; Monitoring, Intraoperative; Ocular Hypertension; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Timolol; Tonometry, Ocular

To compare the efficacy of fixed combinations of dorzolamide-timolol (FCDT) and brimonidine-timolol (FCBT) in patients with intraocular pressure (IOP) elevations after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) injections.. This was a prospective, randomized, open-label study. Patients who received IVTA injections due to diffuse diabetic macular edema and who had an IOP of 24 mm Hg or higher after IVTA treatment were included. They were randomized to receive either FCBT or FCDT twice daily. Follow-up visits were scheduled on week 4 and 12 weeks after starting the study medication. At all follow-up visits, IOP was measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry. The primary outcome measure was mean IOP, the secondary outcome was reduction in mean IOP at 4 and 12 weeks compared with postinjection values.. Sixty patients were randomized in 1:1 ratio. The FCBT and FCDT groups were similar in terms of age, sex, and preinjection IOP (P>0.05 for all). Mean postinjection IOP was 31.95±7.39 and 29.83±5.17 mm Hg in FCBT and FCDT groups, respectively (P=0.239). After 4 weeks, mean IOP was 17.05±3.61 mm Hg in FCBT and 18.93±3.30 mm Hg in FCDT groups (P=0.063). After 12 weeks, mean IOP in the FCBT and FCDT study groups was 16.35±2.70 and 18.43±2.82 mm Hg, respectively (P=0.012). Both fixed combinations significantly reduced IOP in comparison with the postinjection values (P<0.05). Mean reduction in IOP after 4 weeks were 14.90±7.28 mm Hg in FCBT and 10.90±4.83 mm Hg in FCDT groups (P=0.024); after 12 weeks, these values were 15.60±7.77 and 11.40±5.89 mm Hg in FCBT and FCDT groups, respectively (P=0.035).. Both FCBT and FCDT are effective in controlling IOP elevations after IVTA injections. The results of this study suggest that FCBT is superior to FCDT in reducing IOP and provides better IOP control after IVTA injections.

Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Brimonidine Tartrate; Diabetic Retinopathy; Drug Combinations; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Intravitreal Injections; Macular Edema; Male; Middle Aged; Ocular Hypertension; Prospective Studies; Quinoxalines; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Timolol; Tonometry, Ocular; Triamcinolone Acetonide

The aim of this study was to compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering efficacy and to determine patient preference based on ocular discomfort with fixed combination brinzolamide/timolol and fixed combination dorzolamide/timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who required a change in therapy due to elevated IOP while receiving IOP-lowering medication.. This was a 3-month, randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled, parallel-group trial. Patients had open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension, which could not be controlled with monotherapy and were randomized to twice daily therapy with either brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% or dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5%. IOP assessments were taken at 8 AM, 10 AM, and 4 PM at week 2 as well as at months 1, 2, and 3. Patients completed ocular discomfort assessments (based on stinging, burning, feeling of heat or warmth, or sharp pain) on their current IOP lowering therapy at baseline.. Of the 114 patients enrolled, 57 received Brinz/Tim and 57 received Dorz/Tim twice daily. Both medications produced statistically relevant IOP reductions, which were similar in both groups at each visit. The IOP reductions with Brinz/Tim ranged from 6.42 to 9.74 mmHg (26.09%-37.46%), whereas Dorz/Tim produced mean IOP reductions ranging from 8.16 to 12.41 mmHg (31.19%-41.44%) (P>0.05). Brinz/Tim showed significantly less ocular irritation (0.5% vs. 15.7%, respectively; P=0.0004) than Dorz/Tim.. Both Brinz/Tim and Dorz/Tim showed similar significant and clinically relevant IOP-lowering efficacy, whereas Brinz/Tim provided superior outcomes in terms of ocular comfort.

Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Male; Middle Aged; Ocular Hypertension; Patient Preference; Sulfonamides; Thiazines; Thiophenes; Timolol; Treatment Outcome

The purpose of this study was to evaluate intraocular pressure increase after intravitreal injections (IVIs) and the effect of prophylactic pressure-lowering medications.. A prospective study of 210 anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) IVI (0.05 mL of bevacizumab or ranibizumab), that were divided into five groups, group 1: no intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medication (n=50); group 2: apraclonidine 1 % one drop 2 hours prior to IVI (n=50); group 3: acetazolamide 250 mg 2 hours prior (n=50); group 4: fixed combination brimonidine+timolol (n=30); group 5: fixed combination dorzolamide+timolol (n=30). IOP was measured before, immediately after (T1), 15 min after (T15) and 45 min after (T45) the IVI using a Perkins tonometer.. The mean IOP peak in group 1 was 46.4 ± 4.8 mmHg at T1, 21.7 ± 5.7 mmHg at T15 and 15.4 ± 4.3 mmHg at T45. Apraclonidine 1 % and the fixed combinations produced a significant reduction of IOP at every time point, of around 9 mmHg at T1. The reduction in IOP obtained with acetazolamide was not significant versus group 1 at T1 (-1.6 mmHg, P=0.12), but became significant at T15 and T45 (respectively, P=0.011 and P=0.015).. IOP spikes are high but transient following IVI. Acetazolamide proved to be ineffective in preventing this spike. Topical medications, however, produced a significant reduction in IOP spike as well as in the duration of the increased pressure, with no significant difference between fixed combinations and 1 % apraclonidine at T1. It would seem advisable to prevent this IOP spike in the case of repeated injections, particularly in patients with glaucoma.

Topics: Acetazolamide; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antihypertensive Agents; Bevacizumab; Brimonidine Tartrate; Chemoprevention; Clonidine; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Hypotonic Solutions; Intraocular Pressure; Intravitreal Injections; Macular Degeneration; Male; Ocular Hypertension; Quinoxalines; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Timolol; Tonometry, Ocular; Treatment Outcome

To investigate the ocular hypotensive effect and safety of dorzolamide hydrochloride 1 %/timolol maleate 0.5 % fixed-combination eye drops.. The study cohort comprised 34 patients with either primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who were being concomitantly treated with dorzolamide hydrochloride 1 % eye drops and timolol maleate 0.5 % eye drops. The dorzolamide hydrochloride 1 % and timolol maleate 0.5 % eye drops were replaced with dorzolamide hydrochloride 1 %/timolol maleate 0.5 % fixed-combination eye drops without any washout period. The intraocular pressure (IOP) was evaluated both before and 1 and 3 months after the treatment change. The patients were asked to complete a questionnaire on adherence to the treatment protocol 1 month after the change in treatment.. The IOP was 15.5 ± 2.7 mmHg at the time of treatment change, 15.2 ± 2.7 mmHg at 1 month post-change, and 15.5 ± 2.9 mmHg at 3 months post-change, which is consistent with that before the treatment change (p = 0.286). Based on the completed questionnaire, following the treatment change, 50 % of patients felt a stinging sensation following administration of the eye drops and 11.8 % experienced blurred vision. In no case were the eye drops discontinued due to adverse reactions or insufficient IOP decrease.. The replacement of concomitant treatment with dorzolamide hydrochloride 1 % and timolol maleate 0.5 % eye drops with dorzolamide hydrochloride 1 %/timolol maleate 0.5 % fixed-combination eye drops improved protocol adherence and preserved the IOP.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antihypertensive Agents; Drug Combinations; Drug Evaluation; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Ocular Hypertension; Ophthalmic Solutions; Sulfonamides; Surveys and Questionnaires; Thiophenes; Timolol; Tonometry, Ocular

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of preservative-free (PF) and preservative-containing (PC) formulations of the dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination (COSOPT™) in patients with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP).. A parallel, randomized, double-masked study was conducted. After a 3-week run-in on timolol, patients with ocular hypertension, as confirmed by an IOP ≥22 mmHg, were randomized 1:1 to receive PF or PC dorzolamide/timolol twice daily for 12 weeks. IOP was measured at hour 0 (drug trough) and hour 2 (drug peak) at baseline (last day of 3-week timolol run-in), and weeks 2, 6 and 12.. A total of 261 patients were randomized. Mean baseline IOPs were 23.7 mmHg for both treatments at hour 0 and 21.2 mmHg for PF dorzolamide/timolol and 21.4 mmHg for PC dorzolamide/timolol at hour 2. At all study time points (trough and peak at weeks 2, 6, and 12), the difference between treatments in mean change from baseline IOP was <0.5 mmHg. The 95% confidence intervals for the estimated treatment difference (PF minus PC) in mean change from baseline IOP at week 12 was -0.86 to 0.23 mmHg for trough (primary endpoint) and -0.39 to 0.67 mmHg for peak (secondary endpoint). The most common adverse events were ocular burning/stinging, reported by 16.0% and 21.5% of patients receiving PF and PC dorzolamide/timolol respectively, and taste perversion, reported by 3.1% and 5.4% of patients receiving PF and PC dorzolamide/timolol respectively.. In patients with elevated IOP, PF and PC dorzolamide/timolol were equivalent in efficacy for change in trough and peak IOP, and had generally similar tolerability.

Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Male; Middle Aged; Ocular Hypertension; Preservatives, Pharmaceutical; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Timolol; Tonometry, Ocular; Treatment Outcome

The existence of "ophthalmotonic consensual reaction," a contralateral change in intraocular pressure in the fellow eye induced by treatment of the first eye only, was suggested in 1924. Since then, the validity of this mechanism has been controversial.. To assess intraocular pressure changes in the contralateral fellow eyes of patients treated with IOP-lowering medication in one eye, and investigate the existence of an ophthalmotonic consensual reaction.. The study population included 38 patients with newly diagnosed bilateral ocular hypertension or early open angle glaucoma. One eye of each patient was randomly treated with one of five compounds: prostaglandin analogues, beta-blockers, alpha-2 agonists, carbonic anhidrase inhibitors and a combination therapy: dorzolamide hydrochloride-timolol maleate (Cosopt, Merck Sharpe & Dohme). The eye with the higher baseline IOP was selected to be the treated eye. After 3 weeks a masked examiner measured the IOP in both the treated and untreated eye.. Mean IOP of the treated eyes at baseline was 26.1 +/- 4.2 mmHg and at follow-up 20.2 +/-2.9 mmHg, a reduction of IOP from baseline of -6 +/- 3.8 mmHg, a mean percent reduction of -22 +/- 10.1%. In the contralateral eyes, the mean IOP at baseline was 24.2 +/- 3 mmHg and 23.1 +/- 3.1 mmHg at follow-up; IOP reduction from baseline was -1.2 +/- 1.8 mmHg, or mean percent reduction -4.7 +/- 7.1%. A major contralateral IOP decrease was seen only in the beta-blockers and the combination (Cosopt) treatment groups (-6.1 +/- 8.3% and -12.3 +/- 8.3% mean percent reduction, respectively, P < 0.05). The contralateral eyes in the prostaglandin analogues, CAI or alpha2-agonist groups showed only a small change in IOP (-2.6 +/- 4.6%, -3.2 +/- 2.6%, +0.7 +/- 3.3%, mean percent reduction, respectively, P < 0.05).. The existence of an ophthalmotonic consensual reaction was not supported.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Adult; Antihypertensive Agents; Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors; Cohort Studies; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Male; Ocular Hypertension; Ophthalmic Solutions; Prostaglandins, Synthetic; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Timolol

To examine whether the addition of dorzolamide to timolol monotherapy influences oxygen saturation in the human retina.. Non-invasive spectrophotometric retinal oximetry was used to measure oxygen saturation in retinal vessels. Twenty patients with open-angle glaucoma (11) and ocular hypertension (9) were recruited. The patients were randomised into receiving timolol monotherapy or dorzolamide-timolol combination for an 8-month test period, followed by a second test period, before which the patients switched treatments. Oximetry measurements were performed at 2-month intervals during each period. Of the 20 patients, 13 followed the study protocol into the second test period, and 10 managed all study visits.. The oxygen saturation in retinal vessels was stable within the test periods. The mean arteriolar saturation was 96 (2)% (mean (SD)) during timolol monotherapy and 97 (2)% during dorzolamide-timolol combination therapy (p = 0.17, all patients pooled, n = 13). Corresponding values in venules were 66 (5)% during timolol monotherapy and 65 (6)% during dorzolamide-timolol therapy (p = 0.13). Patients who started on dorzolamide-timolol combination showed a significant reduction in arteriolar (98 (2)% to 95 (2)%, p<0.01) and venular saturation (69 (5)% to 66 (6)%, p<0.05) when changing to timolol monotherapy.. Adding dorzolamide to timolol monotherapy has a minimal effect, but going from dorzolamide-timolol combination to timolol alone lowered arteriolar and venular oxygen saturation. The retinal oxygen saturation measurements show a high degree of stability over an extended period of time. Previous studies have suggested increased retinal and optic nerve blood flow with dorzolamide. Unchanged oxygen saturation and increased blood flow would indicate increased oxygen delivery to the retina.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Male; Middle Aged; Ocular Hypertension; Oximetry; Oxygen; Retinal Vessels; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Timolol; Young Adult

To evaluate the 24-hour intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect of latanoprost and the dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination (DTFC) after 2 and 6 months of treatment.. Randomized, prospective, crossover comparison.. Thirty-nine patients had primary open-angle glaucoma, and 14 patients had ocular hypertension.. After a 6-week washout period, patients were randomized to either 6 months of treatment with the DTFC twice daily or latanoprost every evening and then crossed over to the opposite treatment for an additional 6 months.. Mean 24-hour IOP after 2 and 6 months of treatment.. Fifty-three patients had an average 24-hour baseline IOP of 25.2+/-2.3 mmHg. After 6 months of treatment, 24-hour IOPs were 18.1+/-1.9 mmHg for the DTFC and 18.3+/-1.9 mmHg for latanoprost. Compared with 2 months of therapy, at 6 months the DTFC showed no significant change in mean 24-hour IOP, whereas latanoprost demonstrated a reduction of 0.3 mmHg (P = 0.01). The DTFC had more burning (P<0.001) and bitter taste (P = 0.01), whereas the latanoprost had more hypertrichosis (P = 0.02).. After 6 months of therapy, the DTFC and latanoprost have clinically similar 24-hour IOP-lowering efficacies.

Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Circadian Rhythm; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Combinations; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Latanoprost; Male; Middle Aged; Ocular Hypertension; Prospective Studies; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic; Sulfonamides; Therapeutic Equivalency; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Timolol; Tonometry, Ocular; Treatment Outcome

The efficacy of dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination (DTFC) versus latanoprost/timolol fixed combination (LTFC) in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertensive patients.. Patients were randomized to DTFC or LTFC for 6 weeks and switched to opposite treatment for Period 2.. Thirty-two completed patients had a mean diurnal IOP of 19.5+/-3.2 mmHg for DTFC and 18.9+/-3.4 mmHg for LTFC (p=0.12), with no significant difference found between DTFC and LTFC at any timepoint following a Bonferroni correction (p>or=0.01).. Patients treated with DTFC and LTFC have a statistically similar ocular hypotensive effect.

Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Latanoprost; Male; Middle Aged; Ocular Hypertension; Prospective Studies; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Timolol; Tonometry, Ocular

To compare the efficacy of the fixed dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% combination (COSOPT) versus latanoprost 0.005% (XALATAN).. Two 3-month, parallel group, randomized, observer-masked and patient-masked, multicentre, clinical trials were performed in patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma. Study 1 (n=256) was conducted in the United States and Study 2 (n=288) was conducted in Europe/Israel. Patients could be included whether or not they were currently taking ocular hypotensive therapy, and regardless of the effectiveness of any previous therapy. Patients were washed out from their usual ocular hypotensive medications and then those with a baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) >/= 24 mmHg were randomized to either the dorzolamide/timolol combination eye drops twice daily or latanoprost eye drops once daily in both eyes. Efficacy was assessed by daytime diurnal IOP (the mean of measurements made at 0800, 1000, 1400 and 1600 h).. At baseline, the mean daytime diurnal IOP was 26.1 mmHg in the dorzolamide/timolol combination group versus 25.6 mmHg in the latanoprost group in Study 1, and 25.3 mmHg in the dorzolamide/timolol combination group versus 24.7 mmHg in the latanoprost group in Study 2. After 3 months, the mean daytime diurnal IOP was 18.9 mmHg for the dorzolamide/timolol combination versus 18.4 mmHg for latanoprost in Study 1, and 17.4 mmHg for the dorzolamide/timolol combination versus 17.5 for latanoprost in Study 2. The difference between treatments in mean IOP change at 3 months was -0.04 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.85, 0.77] in Study 1, and -0.57 mmHg (95% CI -1.31, 0.16) in Study 2. The probability that the true difference lay between -1.5 and 1.5 mmHg, the predefined bounds for equivalence, was >0.950 in both studies. Both treatments were well tolerated over 3 months, although ocular stinging occurred more frequently with the dorzolamide/timolol combination.. The dorzolamide/timolol combination and latanoprost were equally effective at lowering IOP.

Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Latanoprost; Male; Middle Aged; Ocular Hypertension; Ophthalmic Solutions; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic; Safety; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Timolol; Treatment Outcome

To compare the efficacy and safety of topical bimatoprost (LUMIGAN; Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA) once daily with that of topical combined timolol and dorzolamide (Cosopt; Merck and Co, Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ) twice daily.. Prospective, randomized, double-masked, multicenter clinical trial.. One hundred seventy-seven patients with a diagnosis of glaucoma or ocular hypertension and inadequate control of intraocular pressure (IOP) after at least 2 weeks of topical timolol maleate 0.5% monotherapy.. Patients were randomized to receive bimatoprost 0.03% once daily (n = 90) or combined timolol 0.5% and dorzolamide 2% twice daily (n = 87) over a 3-month period.. Intraocular pressure, the primary end point, was measured at 8 AM and 10 AM at baseline, week 1, and months 1, 2, and 3, and also at 4 PM and 8 PM at baseline and month 3.. Bimatoprost provided significantly greater IOP lowering compared with combined timolol and dorzolamide. At the 8 AM measurements, bimatoprost lowered mean IOP 6.8 mmHg to 7.6 mmHg from baseline, whereas combined timolol and dorzolamide lowered mean IOP 4.4 to 5.0 mmHg from baseline (P<0.001). At the last follow-up, patients had better diurnal IOP control with bimatoprost than combined timolol and dorzolamide. At 8 AM at the 3-month visit, the percentages of patients achieving IOPs of

Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amides; Antihypertensive Agents; Bimatoprost; Cloprostenol; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Glaucoma; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Ocular Hypertension; Ophthalmic Solutions; Prospective Studies; Safety; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Timolol

To determine whether the consumption of topical glaucoma medication is influenced by the type of eye drop dispenser.. Retrospective cohort study.. We examined 366 patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who were bilaterally treated with 0.0015% tafluprost or 2% dorzolamide/0.5% timolol fixed combination (DTFC). The patients were grouped by the type of dispenser and content of eye drops used: (1) tafluprost in bottles (T-Bottle group); (2) tafluprost in unit-dose pipettes (T-Unit group); (3) DTFC in bottles (C-Bottle group); and (4) DTFC in unit-dose pipettes (C-Unit group). We evaluated the medication possession ratio (MPR) among groups, and factors associated with over-consumption (MPR > 1.2) or under-consumption (MPR < 0.8) in multinomial logistic regression.. The mean MPR was 1.49 (range, 0.69-2.91) in the T-Bottle group, 0.91 (range, 0.32-1.27) in the T-Unit group, 1.25 (range, 0.51-2.60) in the C-Bottle group, and 0.96 (range, 0.36-1.60) in the C-Unit group. The Bottle groups demonstrated higher mean values and wider ranges of MPR compared to the Unit groups. The MPR interval at which the largest number of patients were found was 1.0-1.4 in the Bottle groups and 0.8-1.2 in the Unit groups. Bottle-type dispenser (odds ratio [OR] 64.02), tafluprost medication (OR 2.84), and older age (OR 1.03) were associated with over-consumption, whereas no factor was correlated with under-consumption.. The type of eye drop dispenser affects the consumption of glaucoma medication. Physicians should consider the type of eye drop dispenser when assessing glaucoma medication adherence.

Topics: Administration, Ophthalmic; Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Drug Combinations; Drug Packaging; Drug Utilization; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Male; Middle Aged; Ocular Hypertension; Ophthalmic Solutions; Prostaglandins F; Retrospective Studies; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Timolol

To test the hypothesis that the use of refrigerated fixed combination of dorzolamide 2% plus timolol 0.5% solution (COSOPT. In this prospective comparative study, 30 primary open-angle patients and 30 healthy subjects filled in the questionnaire on symptoms (Ocular Surface Disease Index) and subjective stinging feeling scale (1-10), at the start of study and 30 days after continuous use of refrigerated fixed combination or placebo eye drops. Results were processed by applying the methods of descriptive (arithmetical mean, standard deviation) and analytical statistics for evaluation of significance of the difference (Student's t-test).. Ocular discomfort parameters were significantly lower after the use of refrigerated fixed combination of dorzolamide 2% plus timolol 0.5% solution (t-test, P < 0.0001). Breakup time, Schirmer 1 test, and intraocular pressure values did not differ.. The use of refrigerated fixed combination of dorzolamide 2% plus timolol 0.5% (COSOPT) solution is associated with less ocular discomfort than the use of the same fixed combination at room temperature.

Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Drug Combinations; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Ocular Hypertension; Ophthalmic Solutions; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Timolol

To compare the ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) lowering effects of preservative-free tafluprost and dorzolamide-timolol fixed combination (DTFC) using dynamic contour tonometry.. In total, 66 eyes of 66 patients with normal tension glaucoma (NTG) (n = 34) or primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) (n = 32) were included. Patients were divided into two groups: the preservative-free tafluprost-treated group (n = 33) and the preservative-free DTFC-treated group (n = 33). Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). OPA was measured using dynamic contour tonometry; corrected OPA (cOPA) was calculated at baseline and at 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment.. After 6 months of treatment, tafluprost significantly reduced IOP (P < 0.001). The OPA lowering effects differed significantly between the two treatment groups (P = 0.003). The cOPA-lowering effect of tafluprost (1.09 mmHg) was significantly greater than that of DTFC (0.36 mmHg) after 6 months of treatment (P = 0.01).. Tafluprost and DTFC glaucoma treatments provided marked OPA and IOP lowering effects. Tafluprost had a greater effect than DTFC; thus, this drug is recommended for patients at risk of glaucoma progression, due to the high OPA caused by large fluctuations in IOP.

Topics: Drug Combinations; Eye; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Low Tension Glaucoma; Male; Middle Aged; Ocular Hypertension; Ophthalmic Solutions; Preservatives, Pharmaceutical; Prostaglandins F; Retrospective Studies; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Timolol; Tonometry, Ocular

Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) and venous congestion may produce a low ocular perfusion state that can lead to postoperative visual loss (POVL). The literature cites the importance of early IOP reduction to prevent optic nerve damage and visual loss. This study examined dorzolamide hydrochloride and timolol maleate (Cosopt) eyedrops on reducing elevated IOP during laparoscopic surgery with the patient in steep Trendelenburg position. A quasi-experimental study design was used. Subjects involving robotic urologic and gynecologic procedures at 3 separate medical centers were included. The medication was administered topically to both eyes at time points when IOP approached 40 mm Hg. The IOP was measured at 30-minute intervals compared with a supine, anesthetized baseline and final postprocedure supine measurements. A total of 194 patients were recruited, and 63 patients received dorzolamide-timolol treatment when IOP levels reached 38 to 40 mm Hg. Repeated-measures analysis of variance showed that IOP values dropped significantly after drug intervention at 60, 90, and 120 minutes (P < .001). Effect sizes of pharmacologic intervention on IOP reduction were strong (partial eta2 of 0.60 to 0.66). Treatment with dorzolamide-timolol eyedrops significantly reduces elevated IOP of patients who undergo lengthy laparoscopic surgery in the steep Trendelenburg position.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anesthesia; Antihypertensive Agents; Blindness; Drug Combinations; Female; Head-Down Tilt; Humans; Laparoscopy; Male; Middle Aged; New England; Ocular Hypertension; Ophthalmic Solutions; Perioperative Care; Postoperative Complications; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Timolol; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of dorzolamide-timolol (DT) in the management of open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and ocular hypertension.. An open-label, 12-week, multicenter, Canadian study was conducted. Patients with untreated OAG or ocular hypertension received DT for 12 weeks to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP). If target IOP was not reached after the first 6-week treatment period, a prostaglandin (PG) (latanoprost) was added for the remaining 6 weeks. Primary outcome measures were changes in IOP from baseline to 6 and 12 weeks of treatment, and secondary outcome measures included the proportion of patients achieving target IOP and the proportion of patients achieving therapeutic response defined as a reduction of 5.0 mmHg or 20% in IOP from baseline. IOP values were the mean of 2 measures taken before and at least 2 h after patients administered the study medication.. A total of 164 patients were enrolled. Mean [standard deviation (SD)] population age was 63.0 (12.3) years and 53.0% of the patients were men. At week 6, the mean (SD) absolute and percent change in IOP for the total population was (-11.1) (4.9) and (-36.4)% (13.9%), respectively, and 92.1% of the patients achieved a reduction in IOP of at least 5 mmHg. Therapeutic target was achieved by 136 (82.9%) patients (DT subgroup) at 6 weeks, whereas 28 (17.1%) patients were changed to a combination therapy of DT and latanoprost [DT plus PG (DT & PG) subgroup]. Between weeks 6 and 12, DT was effective in sustaining the IOP within therapeutic target, whereas addition of latanoprost reduced the IOP of the DT & PG subgroup by an additional 6.3 mmHg or 22.1% (20.1%). At week 12, patients in the DT subgroup experienced a clinically and statistically significant mean (SD) decrease in IOP from a baseline of 12.2 mmHg or 40.4% (11.9%) (P < 0.001), whereas these values corresponded to 13.4 mmHg and 39.7% (15.7%) (P < 0.001), respectively, in the DT & PG subgroup. The proportion of patients who achieved therapeutic response during the entire 12-week study period was over 82%. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were reported by 19 (14.0%) patients in the DT subgroup and by 6 (21.4%) patients in the combination subgroup. Eye disorders and nervous system disorders were among the most common treatment-related AEs in both subgroups. No serious AEs were reported during the study period.. DT alone and DT in combination with a PG are effective in significantly reducing IOP in patients with untreated OAG or ocular hypertension. The treatment was safe and well tolerated with a low incidence of AEs.

Topics: Aged; Drug Combinations; Eye; Female; Glaucoma; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Latanoprost; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Ocular Hypertension; Ophthalmic Solutions; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Timolol; Tonometry, Ocular; Treatment Outcome

We document the recurrence of a CSMD in a patient subsequent to the instillation of topical ocular hypotensive medications and its resolution on discontinuation of therapy. An independent cause or causes contributing to the development of CSMD other than the use of topical ocular hypotensive medications cannot be ruled out in this case, neither can it be considered dissociated from the use of these drugs. We recommend that patients with VTS, those with a history of CSMD or having developed recurrent episodes of CSMD requiring management with topical ocular hypotensive medications, be cautiously monitored for the possible occurrence or exacerbation of CSMD.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Antihypertensive Agents; Clonidine; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Male; Middle Aged; Ocular Hypertension; Recurrence; Retinal Detachment; Serum; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Timolol; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Visual Acuity

Topics: Amides; Antihypertensive Agents; Bimatoprost; Cloprostenol; Drug Combinations; Glaucoma; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Lipids; Ocular Hypertension; Ophthalmic Solutions; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Timolol

To describe prescription trends within a managed care setting for glaucoma medications and to examine the effect of introduction of Cosopt--a fixed combination of dorzolamide and timolol.. All prescriptions dispensed to any of the 470,350 members of an Israeli health maintenance organization were monthly scanned for patients treated for glaucoma, between January 2000 and May 2003. The monthly mean number of glaucoma patients was 3899 +/- 104 (mean +/- SD). All topical glaucoma prescriptions were documented, and the monthly prescription rate of each medication was calculated and plotted. The monitored glaucoma medications were: beta-adrenergic antagonists, dorzolamide, latanoprost, pilocarpine, brimonidine, Cosopt, and others.. beta-adrenergic antagonists were the top prescribing drug (>35% of all glaucoma prescriptions). The prescription rates of pilocarpine and beta-adrenergic antagonists were in constant decline, while latanoprost and brimonidine increased steadily. The introduction of Cosopt changed the prescription trends of dorzolamide from increasing to rapidly decreasing, and accelerated the long-term decline of beta-adrenergic antagonists. Concomitant with the introduction of Cosopt the prescription rate of beta-adrenergic antagonists temporarily increased. This was due to a total increase in glaucoma prescriptions. When Cosopt was introduced, 37.5% of patients were prescribed Cosopt together with beta-adrenergic antagonists, and 16.5% also received dorzolamide. Thereafter the co-prescription decreased steadily.. Introduction of a combination drug should be accompanied by physicians', pharmacists', and patients' education to prevent its inappropriate usage together with its components.

Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Drug Combinations; Drug Prescriptions; Drug Utilization; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Health Maintenance Organizations; Health Services Research; Health Surveys; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Israel; Ocular Hypertension; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Timolol

To analyse a response to the therapy switch from the concomitant application of beta-blocker and topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor to the fixed combination of timolol and dorzolamide (Cosopt) in glaucoma/ocular hypertensive patients under everyday, office-practice conditions.. The data source was a survey among practising ophthalmologists in Switzerland assessing their experience with glaucoma patients/ocular hypertensives put for the first time on the fixed combination of timolol and dorzolamide. A total of 98 patients underwent the therapy switch in at least one eye. The intraocular pressure (IOP) change between the baseline visit before switch to the timolol-dorzolamide fixed combination occurred, and the first follow-up control after the switch, served as an indicator of compliance.. The IOP decreased on average from 19.43 +/- 5.64 mmHg to 17.97 +/- 3.58 mmHg (p < 0.01). The time to the follow-up visit ranged from 4 to 354 days, and the magnitude of IOP change demonstrated a significant dependence on the time to the follow-up visit, also when corrected for baseline IOP level. A total of 87 (85.3%) continued on the timolol-dorzolamide fixed combination therapy after the first control visit. In 68 of these 98 patients the contralateral eyes underwent the same therapy switch, and their IOP followed an identical pattern of behaviour.. The average IOP decrease of 1.5 mmHg upon therapy switch to the timolol-dorzolamide fixed combination suggests a better efficacy due to improved compliance. Short-term compliance benefit seems to be more pronounced. The high timolol-dorzolamide fixed combination therapy continuation rate reflects an improvement in compliance and subjectively-perceived convenience.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors; Cluster Analysis; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Male; Ocular Hypertension; Ophthalmic Solutions; Ophthalmology; Sulfonamides; Switzerland; Thiophenes; Timolol