Page last updated: 2024-10-26

donepezil and Fatigue

donepezil has been researched along with Fatigue in 6 studies

Donepezil: An indan and piperidine derivative that acts as a selective and reversible inhibitor of ACETYLCHOLINESTERASE. Donepezil is highly selective for the central nervous system and is used in the management of mild to moderate DEMENTIA in ALZHEIMER DISEASE.
donepezil : A racemate comprising equimolar amounts of (R)- and (S)-donepezil. A centrally acting reversible acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, its main therapeutic use is in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease where it is used to increase cortical acetylcholine.
2-[(1-benzylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl]-5,6-dimethoxyindan-1-one : A member of the class of indanones that is 5,6-dimethoxyindan-1-one which is substituted at position 2 by an (N-benzylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl group.

Fatigue: The state of weariness following a period of exertion, mental or physical, characterized by a decreased capacity for work and reduced efficiency to respond to stimuli.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"To evaluate the effectiveness of donepezil compared with placebo in cancer patients with fatigue as measured by the Functional Assessment for Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F)."9.12Donepezil for cancer fatigue: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. ( Bruera, E; Driver, LC; El Osta, B; Palmer, JL; Pei, BL; Poulter, VA; Shen, L; Valero, V, 2007)
"Donepezil is widely used to treat Alzheimer's disease (AD), but detecting early response remains challenging for clinicians."6.90Attention Measures of Accuracy, Variability, and Fatigue Detect Early Response to Donepezil in Alzheimer's Disease: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Trial. ( Berger, JT; Foldi, NS; Kaplan, L; Ly, JJ; Macina, LO; Stewart, JL; Van Dyk, K; Vila-Castelar, C, 2019)
"Some breast cancer survivors report cognitive difficulties greater than 1 year after chemotherapy."6.82A study of donepezil in female breast cancer survivors with self-reported cognitive dysfunction 1 to 5 years following adjuvant chemotherapy. ( Balcueva, EP; Case, LD; Griffin, L; Groteluschen, DL; Lawrence, JA; Lesser, GJ; Naughton, MJ; Rapp, SR; Samuel, TA; Shaw, EG, 2016)
"  Studies in early radiotherapy treatment phase (five studies) Pharmacological studies in the "early radiotherapy treatment phase" were designed to prevent or ameliorate cognitive deficits and included drugs used in dementia (memantine) and fatigue (d-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride)."5.22Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation. ( Brown, PD; Day, J; Gehring, K; Grosshans, D; Kirkman, MA; Li, J; Taphoorn, M; Zienius, K, 2022)
"To evaluate the effectiveness of donepezil compared with placebo in cancer patients with fatigue as measured by the Functional Assessment for Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F)."5.12Donepezil for cancer fatigue: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. ( Bruera, E; Driver, LC; El Osta, B; Palmer, JL; Pei, BL; Poulter, VA; Shen, L; Valero, V, 2007)
"Donepezil is widely used to treat Alzheimer's disease (AD), but detecting early response remains challenging for clinicians."2.90Attention Measures of Accuracy, Variability, and Fatigue Detect Early Response to Donepezil in Alzheimer's Disease: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Trial. ( Berger, JT; Foldi, NS; Kaplan, L; Ly, JJ; Macina, LO; Stewart, JL; Van Dyk, K; Vila-Castelar, C, 2019)
"Some breast cancer survivors report cognitive difficulties greater than 1 year after chemotherapy."2.82A study of donepezil in female breast cancer survivors with self-reported cognitive dysfunction 1 to 5 years following adjuvant chemotherapy. ( Balcueva, EP; Case, LD; Griffin, L; Groteluschen, DL; Lawrence, JA; Lesser, GJ; Naughton, MJ; Rapp, SR; Samuel, TA; Shaw, EG, 2016)
"All 24 patients had a primary brain tumor, mostly low-grade glioma."2.72Phase II study of donepezil in irradiated brain tumor patients: effect on cognitive function, mood, and quality of life. ( D'Agostino, RB; Lovato, J; Naughton, MJ; Rapp, SR; Robbins, ME; Rosdhal, R; Shaw, EG, 2006)

Research

Studies (6)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's2 (33.33)29.6817
2010's3 (50.00)24.3611
2020's1 (16.67)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Kirkman, MA3
Day, J3
Gehring, K3
Zienius, K3
Grosshans, D3
Taphoorn, M3
Li, J3
Brown, PD3
Vila-Castelar, C1
Ly, JJ1
Kaplan, L1
Van Dyk, K1
Berger, JT1
Macina, LO1
Stewart, JL1
Foldi, NS1
Lawrence, JA1
Griffin, L1
Balcueva, EP1
Groteluschen, DL1
Samuel, TA1
Lesser, GJ1
Naughton, MJ2
Case, LD1
Shaw, EG2
Rapp, SR2
Strober, LB1
Christodoulou, C1
Benedict, RH1
Westervelt, HJ1
Melville, P1
Scherl, WF1
Weinstock-Guttman, B1
Rizvi, S1
Goodman, AD1
Krupp, LB1
Rosdhal, R1
D'Agostino, RB1
Lovato, J1
Robbins, ME1
Bruera, E1
El Osta, B1
Valero, V1
Driver, LC1
Pei, BL1
Shen, L1
Poulter, VA1
Palmer, JL1

Clinical Trials (4)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Detecting an Early Response to Donepezil With Measures of Visual Attention[NCT03073876]Phase 425 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-01Completed
A Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial of Ashwagandha (Withania Somnifera) for Cognitive Dysfunction Associated With Cancer Chemotherapy.[NCT04092647]Phase 280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-01Recruiting
Intranasal Insulin for Improving Cognitive Function in Multiple Sclerosis[NCT02988401]Phase 1/Phase 2105 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-01Completed
Donepezil and EGb761 in Improving Neurocognitive Function in Patients Who Have Previously Undergone Radiation Therapy for Primary Brain Tumor or Brain Metastases[NCT00070161]Phase 268 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-07-01Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-Cog)

Change of Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog); primary outcome measure of drug efficacy. Minimum value = 0, maximum value = 70. Higher scores represent worse cognitive functioning. (NCT03073876)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Drug-1.90
Placebo.99

Change in Attentional Blink Task Baseline to 6 Weeks - SOA 399ms

Computerized attention task measures the accuracy of reporting stimuli presented within 399 ms interval. Higher accuracy represents better performance. (NCT03073876)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 weeks

Interventionmilliseconds (Mean)
Drug Treatment-.022

Change in Attentional Blink Task Baseline to 6 Weeks - Stimulus Onset Asynchrony (SOA) 266ms

Computerized attention task measures the accuracy of reporting stimuli presented at time intervals, varying load. Faster reaction time and accuracy represents better performance. (NCT03073876)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 weeks

Interventionmilliseconds (Mean)
Drug Treatment-.06

Change in Category Fluency Test

Measure of language / semantic function. This task requires participants to generate words belonging to specific categories within 1 minute. There are three trials. Total scores is computed by obtaining the mean number of words generated across the three trials (fruits/vegetables/animals). Higher score represents better outcome. (NCT03073876)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Drug.17
Placebo-2.8

Change in Covert Orienting Task

Computerized attention task measuring response time to detect a target after a spatial orienting cues of either valid (cue on same side in space as target) or Invalid Cue (cue on opposite side of space as target). Longer response time (msec) indicates worse performance. (NCT03073876)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 weeks

Interventionmilliseconds (Median)
Drug496.5
Placebo452.5

Change in Dementia Rating Scale

Dementia Rating Scale (DRS) change score (performance at 6 weeks minus performance at baseline). This is a global measure of cognitive function. Scores range from 0 - 144; higher scores represent better cognitive functioning. (NCT03073876)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Drug1.67
Placebo-.54

Change in Digit Span Backwards

This measure represents the change in the variable longest Digit Span Backwards (LDSB) from baseline to 6 weeks. Score represents the maximum length of number repeated in the backward condition. Score ranges from 0 to 8. Higher scores represent better outcome. (NCT03073876)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Drug0.5
Placebo0.1

Change in Digit Span Forward

This measure represents the change in the variable longest Digit Span Forward (LDSF) from baseline to 6 weeks. Score represents the maximum length of number repeated in the forward condition. Score ranges from 0 to 9. Higher scores represent better outcome. (NCT03073876)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Drug-0.6
Placebo-0.4

Change in Hopkins Verbal Learning Test- Revised - Recall

Hopkins Verbal Learning Test- Revised (HVLT-R) (Brandt, 1991) is a list-learning task. Recall variable is computed by adding the number of words repeated in each of the three learning trials. Raw scores of each measure were used in the analyses. Total Recall ranges from 0-30. Higher scores represent better outcome. (NCT03073876)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Drug.17
Placebo.40

Change in Language Function Assessed With the Letter Fluency Test

Letter fluency (FAS) (Benton, 1967) was selected to assess speed of verbal generativity. Participants are required to generate words that start with a particular letter (excluding n; three trials (words starting with 'F', 'A', 'S' each for 1 minute minutes) are administered. Higher performance is better with range from 0 to unlimited. (NCT03073876)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Drug.003
Placebo.17

Change in Visual Form Discrimination

Measure of visuospatial function requiring matching designs from the Benton Visual Form Discrimination test. Total scores is calculated by adding the number of items correct. Total score ranges from 0-32, higher score is better. (NCT03073876)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Drug.92
Placebo.33

Change of ADAS-COG From Baseline to 6 Months

Change of Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog); primary outcome measure of drug efficacy. Minimum value = 0, maximum value = 70. Higher scores represent worse cognitive functioning. (NCT03073876)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Drug Treatment-.29

Change on Trail Making Test - Condition

The Delis-Kaplan Executive Function (D-KEFS Trail) Subtest 4: Number-Letter Switching Scaled Score was used to assess executive functioning. Scaled scores range from 1-19. Higher scores represent less impairment (below 8 = low; 8-12 = average; > 12 = above average). Scores represent seconds to complete the task. Faster performance is better. (NCT03073876)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Drug-1.67
Placebo-2.3

Instrumental Activities of Daily Living

Scale of instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), adapted from Lawton Brody scale. Caregiver rates 8 functional items from 0-2 severity. Total score is the sum of ratings for each item. Total score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 16 (maximum) with higher scores representing worse functional outcomes. (NCT03073876)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Drug Treatment6.54

Mini Mental Status Examination

Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) is a commonly used cognitive screener. Scores range from 0-30; higher scores mean better cognitive functioning. (NCT03073876)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Drug-.17
Placebo-1.09

Neuropsychiatric Inventory Score

Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) is a scale that measures neuropsychiatric symptoms. We reported a score that captures the frequency of each symptom multiplied by the severity rating score. Scores range from 0 - 144; Higher scores represent worse outcomes. (NCT03073876)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Drug Treatment14.09

Change in Foreperiod Effect Task - Processing Speed

Computerized attention task measures response time to detect a target presented at varied interstimulus intervals (350ms and 500ms). Participants respond to centrally presented asterisk on computer screen. Time elapsed from prior stimulus (= interstimulus interval) indicates when prior stimulus was presented. xx (NCT03073876)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 weeks

,
Interventionresponse time in msec (Median)
350500
Drug4233
Placebo1313

Change in Foreperiod Effect Task - Variability (350ms & 500ms)

Computerized attention task measures the variability (SD) in response time to detect a target presented at varied interstimulus intervals (350ms and 500ms) (NCT03073876)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 weeks

,
Interventionmsec (Mean)
350ms500ms
Drug-26.728.46
Placebo-4.58.37

Covert Orienting at 6 Weeks - Fatigue Across Blocks

Computerized attention task measures response time to detect a target across blocks of stimuli. Data shown for performance at Block1 and Block5 (NCT03073876)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

,
Interventionmsec (Median)
Block 1Block 5
Drug415451
Placebo402487

Foreperiod Effect Task at 6 Weeks - Fatigue (Blocks 1 & 2)

Computerized attention task measures reaction time (RT) to detect a target presented at varied interstimulus interval comparing Block 1 (presented at beginning of session) and Block 2 (presented at end of session) (NCT03073876)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

,
Interventionmsec (Median)
Block 1Block 2
Drug400395
Placebo331385

Assess Depression Severity, as Measured by the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)

The BDI-II is a 21-question multiple-choice self-report inventory test for measuring the severity of depression. Scores range from zero to 63; higher scores indicate greater depression. In order to account for all contributed data (even for those who did not complete the study but contributed some post-randomization data in the active study phase), the analyses include the BDI-II scores acquired within the active treatment phase (from baseline to week 24 visit). We then calculated and report the average change per week in the scores. (NCT02988401)
Timeframe: Up to week 24 visit

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Insulin 20 International Units-0.022
Intranasal Insulin 10 International Units-0.019
Placebo-0.045

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Assessed by the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R) Delayed Recall

This is a visual, nonverbal test of learning and memory. Scores range from zero to 12; higher is better. In order to account for all contributed data (even for those who did not complete the study but contributed some post-randomization data in the active study phase), the analyses include the BVMT-R delayed recall scores acquired within the active treatment phase (from baseline to week 24 visit). We then calculated and report the average change per week in the score. (NCT02988401)
Timeframe: Up to week 24 visit

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Insulin 20 International Units0.027
Intranasal Insulin 10 International Units0.059
Placebo0.030

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Assessed by the California Verbal Learning Test, Second Edition (CVLT-II)

This is a verbal learning and memory test. Scores range from zero to 16; a higher number is better. In order to account for all contributed data (even for those who did not complete the study but contributed some post-randomization data in the active study phase), the primary analyses include the CVLT-II scores acquired within the active treatment phase (from baseline to week 24 visit). We then calculated and report the average change per week in the score. (NCT02988401)
Timeframe: Up to week 24 visit

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Insulin 20 International Units0.082
Intranasal Insulin 10 International Units0.021
Placebo0.020

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Assessed by the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT)

This test measures phonemic fluency. The test scores the number of words a participant can provide that begin with a specified letter within one minute, such that scores range from zero (worst) to an infinite number (better). Total score is sum of three 60-second trials. In order to account for all contributed data (even for those who did not complete the study but contributed some post-randomization data in the active study phase), the primary analyses include the COWAT scores acquired within the active treatment phase (from baseline to week 24 visit). We then calculated and report the average change per week in the score. (NCT02988401)
Timeframe: Up to week 24 visit

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Insulin 20 International Units0.090
Intranasal Insulin 10 International Units0.070
Placebo0.021

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Assessed by the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Sorting Test

This test measures executive functioning, concept formation, and cognitive flexibility. Scores range from zero to 16; higher is better. In order to account for all contributed data (even for those who did not complete the study but contributed some post-randomization data in the active study phase), the analyses include DKEFS correct sort scores acquired within the active treatment phase (from baseline to week 24 visit). We then calculated and report the average change per week in the score. (NCT02988401)
Timeframe: Up to week 24 visit

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Insulin 20 International Units-0.001
Intranasal Insulin 10 International Units0.027
Placebo0.002

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Assessed by the Judgement of Line Orientation Test (JLO)

Judgment of Line Orientation Test measures a person's ability to match the angle and orientation of lines in space. Scores range from zero to 30; higher is better. In order to account for all contributed data (even for those who did not complete the study but contributed some post-randomization data in the active study phase), the analyses include JLO data acquired within the active treatment phase (from baseline to week 24 visit). We then calculated and report the average change per week in the score. (NCT02988401)
Timeframe: Up to week 24 visit

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Insulin 20 International Units-0.031
Intranasal Insulin 10 International Units0.047
Placebo-0.005

Change in Cognitive Function as Assessed by the Rao-version of the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT)

"The Rao-version of the PASAT evaluates processing speed, working memory, and basic addition skills. Scores range from zero to 60; higher is better. Herein we present 3-second PASAT results (PASAT-3). In order to account for all contributed data (even for those who did not complete the study but contributed some post-randomization data in the active study phase), the analyses include PASAT-3 scores acquired within the active treatment phase (from baseline to week 24 visit). We then calculated and report the average change per week in the SDMT." (NCT02988401)
Timeframe: Up to week 24 visit

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Insulin 20 International Units0.372
Intranasal Insulin 10 International Units0.363
Placebo0.212

Change in Cognitive Function as Assessed by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)

This task will be performed at five study visits. The SDMT is one of the most commonly used tests to assess processing speed in the MS population and is included in the Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in MS (MACFIMS). Higher scores reflect a better outcome (range 0 to 110). In order to account for all contributed data (even for those who did not complete the study but contributed some post-randomization data in the active study phase), the primary analyses include the SDMTs acquired within the active treatment phase (from baseline to week 24 visit). We then calculated and report the average change per week in the SDMT. (NCT02988401)
Timeframe: Up to week 24 visit

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Insulin 20 International Units0.145
Intranasal Insulin 10 International Units0.207
Placebo0.163

Evaluation of How Overall Sleep Quality Impacts People With MS Using a Sleep Questionnaire (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index)

The sleep questionnaire asks subjects to report various aspects related to their sleep routine. Scores range from zero to 21; higher score indicates worse sleep quality. In order to account for all contributed data (even for those who did not complete the study but contributed some post-randomization data in the active study phase), the analyses include the PSQIs acquired within the active treatment phase (from baseline to week 24 visit). We then calculated and report the average change per week in the score. (NCT02988401)
Timeframe: Up to week 24 visit

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Insulin 20 International Units-0.026
Intranasal Insulin 10 International Units0.035
Placebo-0.045

Evaluation of Impact of Study Products on Health Related Quality of Life Using the Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire (FAMS)

FAMS is a self-reported health-related quality-of-life instrument for people with multiple sclerosis. Subjects rate six quality-of-life domains: Mobility, Symptoms, Emotional well-being, General contentment, Thinking/fatigue, and Family/social well-being. Scores range from zero to 176; higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life. In order to account for all contributed data (even for those who did not complete the study but contributed some post-randomization data in the active study phase), the analyses include the FAMS scores acquired within the active treatment phase (from baseline to week 24 visit). We then calculated and report the average change per week in the score. (NCT02988401)
Timeframe: Up to week 24 visit

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Insulin 20 International Units0.056
Intranasal Insulin 10 International Units0.051
Placebo0.240

Number of Participants With Adverse Events Leading to Study Discontinuation

An adverse event will be defined as any occurrence or worsening of an undesirable or unintended sign, symptom (or abnormal laboratory test), or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or intervention, whether or not it is considered related to the product/intervention. We report overall adverse events in the relevant section. Here, we report adverse events that led to study discontinuation. (NCT02988401)
Timeframe: Up to week 24 visit

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Intranasal Insulin 20 International Units3
Intranasal Insulin 10 International Units2
Placebo1

Fingerstick Blood Glucose (Subset)

Fingerstick blood glucose levels were monitored twice within the 90 minutes following the first dose administration of study drug for the first 15 participants. (NCT02988401)
Timeframe: At the baseline visit, monitored twice within the 90 minutes following the first dose administration of study drug

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
First timepointSecond timepoint
Intranasal Insulin 10 International Units95.892.2
Intranasal Insulin 20 International Units97.888.4
Placebo90.087.8

Reviews

1 review available for donepezil and Fatigue

ArticleYear
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2022, 11-25, Volume: 11

    Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cranial Irradiation; Dementia; Donepezil;

2022
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2022, 11-25, Volume: 11

    Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cranial Irradiation; Dementia; Donepezil;

2022
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2022, 11-25, Volume: 11

    Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cranial Irradiation; Dementia; Donepezil;

2022
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2022, 11-25, Volume: 11

    Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cranial Irradiation; Dementia; Donepezil;

2022
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2022, 11-25, Volume: 11

    Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cranial Irradiation; Dementia; Donepezil;

2022
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2022, 11-25, Volume: 11

    Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cranial Irradiation; Dementia; Donepezil;

2022
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2022, 11-25, Volume: 11

    Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cranial Irradiation; Dementia; Donepezil;

2022
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2022, 11-25, Volume: 11

    Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cranial Irradiation; Dementia; Donepezil;

2022
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2022, 11-25, Volume: 11

    Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cranial Irradiation; Dementia; Donepezil;

2022

Trials

4 trials available for donepezil and Fatigue

ArticleYear
Attention Measures of Accuracy, Variability, and Fatigue Detect Early Response to Donepezil in Alzheimer's Disease: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Trial.
    Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 2019, May-01, Volume: 34, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alzheimer Disease; Attention; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Donepezil; Double-

2019
A study of donepezil in female breast cancer survivors with self-reported cognitive dysfunction 1 to 5 years following adjuvant chemotherapy.
    Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2016, Volume: 10, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Affect; Aged; Breast Neoplasms; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Cognition;

2016
Phase II study of donepezil in irradiated brain tumor patients: effect on cognitive function, mood, and quality of life.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2006, Mar-20, Volume: 24, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Affect; Aged; Anger; Brain Neoplasms; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Cognition Disorders; Donepez

2006
Donepezil for cancer fatigue: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2007, Aug-10, Volume: 25, Issue:23

    Topics: Aged; Disease Progression; Donepezil; Double-Blind Method; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Indans; Male; Mi

2007

Other Studies

1 other study available for donepezil and Fatigue

ArticleYear
Unemployment in multiple sclerosis: the contribution of personality and disease.
    Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2012, Volume: 18, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Affect; Chi-Square Distribution; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Cost of Illness; Cross-Secti

2012