Page last updated: 2024-10-26

donepezil and Edema

donepezil has been researched along with Edema in 1 studies

Donepezil: An indan and piperidine derivative that acts as a selective and reversible inhibitor of ACETYLCHOLINESTERASE. Donepezil is highly selective for the central nervous system and is used in the management of mild to moderate DEMENTIA in ALZHEIMER DISEASE.
donepezil : A racemate comprising equimolar amounts of (R)- and (S)-donepezil. A centrally acting reversible acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, its main therapeutic use is in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease where it is used to increase cortical acetylcholine.
2-[(1-benzylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl]-5,6-dimethoxyindan-1-one : A member of the class of indanones that is 5,6-dimethoxyindan-1-one which is substituted at position 2 by an (N-benzylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl group.

Edema: Abnormal fluid accumulation in TISSUES or body cavities. Most cases of edema are present under the SKIN in SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE.

Research

Studies (1)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's0 (0.00)29.6817
2010's1 (100.00)24.3611
2020's0 (0.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Gold, M1
Alderton, C1
Zvartau-Hind, M1
Egginton, S1
Saunders, AM1
Irizarry, M1
Craft, S1
Landreth, G1
Linnamägi, U1
Sawchak, S1

Clinical Trials (3)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Insulin Resistance and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) in Older Chinese Adults With Pre-Diabetes and Diabetes: Cognitive Effects of Lifestyle Intervention and Metformin Treatment in a Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT02409238]Phase 4105 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-11Terminated (stopped due to "Limits of grant funding reached~A/Prof Ng Tze Pin (P.I. & holder of NMRC Grant (CIRG12may033) funding this study) retired in Aug 2022.~Resignations of staff and collaborators especially over the 1st 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic")
A 24-week, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Randomized, Parallel-group Study to Investigate the Effects of Rosiglitazone (Extended Release Tablets), Donepezil, and Placebo as Monotherapy on Cognition and Overall Clinical Response in APOE ε4-stratified Subjects[NCT00428090]Phase 3862 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-27Completed
An Open-label Extension to Study AVA105640, to Assess the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Rosiglitazone (Extended Release Tablets) on Cognition in Subjects With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease.[NCT00550420]Phase 3331 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-01Terminated (stopped due to Based on preliminary parent study results)
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change From Baseline (W0) in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at W24.

The blood sample was collected for assessments of HbA1c levels at Baseline and W24. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0. Endpoint treatment differences which were adjusted to take account of missing data are derived. (NCT00428090)
Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and W24

InterventionPercentage (%) (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.1
RSG XR 2 mg0.2
RSG XR 8 mg0.1
Donepezil 10 mg0.1

Change From Baseline (W0) in Heart Rate (HR) Measured From 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)

Triplicate 12-lead ECG measures was obtained digitally, approximately one minute apart after the par. had rested in the supine position in a quiet room (no TV, minimal talking) for at least 10 minutes. Conduction intervals from the 12-lead ECGs were manually read and confirmed by an external cardiologist/vendor. The ECG HR of Central Cardiologist reported. The assessments was performed at Baseline and W24. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Screening/Visit 1/W-6. (NCT00428090)
Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and up to W24

InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
Placebo2.1
RSG XR 2 mg-2.8
RSG XR 8 mg-0.3
Donepezil 10 mg-4.7

Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean ADAS-Cog Total Score at W24 as a Function of APOE e4 Status in All Except e4/e4's Cohort

The 11-item ADAS-Cog assessed a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Items were evaluated by tests and clinician ratings on a 5-point scale. Scores ranged from 0-70 with higher scores indicates more dysfunction. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline is defined as value at W0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for the two rosiglitazone dose groups and the three genetic subgroups. There was no adjustment for the donepezil versus placebo comparisons, which were included to assess the sensitivity of the trial to detect a treatment effect. (NCT00428090)
Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and W24

InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.5
RSG XR 2 mg0.3
RSG XR 8 mg0.7
Donepezil 10 mg-0.1

Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean ADAS-Cog Total Score at W24 as a Function of APOE e4 Status in Apolipoprotein epsilon4 (APOE e4) Negative Cohort

The 11-item ADAS-Cog assessed a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Items were evaluated by tests and clinician ratings on a 5-point scale. Scores ranged from 0-70 with higher scores indicates more dysfunction. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline is defined as value at W0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for the two rosiglitazone dose groups and the three genetic subgroups. There was no adjustment for the donepezil versus placebo comparisons, which were included to assess the sensitivity of the trial to detect a treatment effect. (NCT00428090)
Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and W24

InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.6
RSG XR 2 mg-0.2
RSG XR 8 mg0.6
Donepezil 10 mg0.9

Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean ADAS-Cog Total Score at W24 as a Function of APOE e4 Status in Full Population Cohort

The 11-item ADAS-Cog assessed a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Items were evaluated by tests and clinician ratings on a 5-point scale. Scores ranged from 0-70 with higher scores indicates more dysfunction. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline is defined as value at W0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for the two rosiglitazone dose groups and the three genetic subgroups. There was no adjustment for the donepezil versus placebo comparisons, which were included to assess the sensitivity of the trial to detect a treatment effect. (NCT00428090)
Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and W24

InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo2.0
RSG XR 2 mg1.2
RSG XR 8 mg1.2
Donepezil 10 mg0.6

Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean CIBIC+ Global Functioning Total Score at W24 as a Function of APOE e4 Status in All Except e4/e4's Cohort

The CIBIC+ assessment comprised of a 7-point rating of severity (at baseline) and change (at indicated time points). It was rated on a scale of 1 to 7 as 1: markedly improved, 2.: moderately improved, 3: minimally improved, 4: no change, 5: minimally worse, 6: moderately worse and 7: markedly worse; higher score means greater dysfunction. It was based on interviews with the par. and caregiver by an independent rater. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0. Endpoint treatment differences which were adjusted to take account of missing data are derived. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for the two rosiglitazone dose groups and the three genetic subgroups. There was no adjustment for the donepezil versus placebo comparisons, which were included to assess the sensitivity of the trial to detect a treatment effect. (NCT00428090)
Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and W24

InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo4.3
RSG XR 2 mg4.3
RSG XR 8 mg4.1
Donepezil 10 mg3.8

Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean CIBIC+ Global Functioning Total Score at W24 as a Function of APOE e4 Status in APOE4 Negative Cohort

The CIBIC+ assessment comprised of a 7-point rating of severity (at baseline) and change (at indicated time points). It was rated on a scale of 1 to 7 as 1: markedly improved, 2.: moderately improved, 3: minimally improved, 4: no change, 5: minimally worse, 6: moderately worse and 7: markedly worse; higher score means greater dysfunction. It was based on interviews with the par. and caregiver by an independent rater. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0. Endpoint treatment differences which were adjusted to take account of missing data are derived. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for the two rosiglitazone dose groups and the three genetic subgroups. There was no adjustment for the donepezil versus placebo comparisons, which were included to assess the sensitivity of the trial to detect a treatment effect. (NCT00428090)
Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and W24

InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo4.2
RSG XR 2 mg4.2
RSG XR 8 mg4.1
Donepezil 10 mg3.9

Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean CIBIC+ Global Functioning Total Score at W24 as a Function of APOE e4 Status in Full Population Cohort

The CIBIC+ assessment comprised of a 7-point rating of severity (at baseline) and change (at indicated time points). It was rated on a scale of 1 to 7 as 1: markedly improved, 2.: moderately improved, 3: minimally improved, 4: no change, 5: minimally worse, 6: moderately worse and 7: markedly worse; higher score means greater dysfunction. It was based on interviews with the par. and caregiver by an independent rater. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0. Endpoint treatment differences which were adjusted to take account of missing data are derived. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for the two rosiglitazone dose groups and the three genetic subgroups. There was no adjustment for the donepezil versus placebo comparisons, which were included to assess the sensitivity of the trial to detect a treatment effect. (NCT00428090)
Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and W24

InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo4.3
RSG XR 2 mg4.3
RSG XR 8 mg4.2
Donepezil 10 mg3.8

Change From Baseline (W0) in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score at W24.

The MMSE consists of 11 tests of orientation, memory (recent and immediate), concentration, language and praxis. Scores range from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment. The scale is completed by the investigator, based on the performance of the par. and takes approximately 5 to 10 minutes to administer. The assessments was performed at Baseline and W24. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0. Endpoint treatment differences which were adjusted to take account of missing data are derived (NCT00428090)
Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and W24

InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.5
RSG XR 2 mg-0.6
RSG XR 8 mg-0.7
Donepezil 10 mg0.4

Change From Baseline (W0) in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)

Triplicate 12-lead ECG measures was obtained digitally, approximately one minute apart after the par. had rested in the supine position in a quiet room (no TV, minimal talking) for at least 10 minutes. Conduction intervals from the 12-lead ECGs were manually read and confirmed by an external cardiologist/vendor. The ECG parameters includes PR interval, QRS duration, QT - uncorrected interval, QTc Bazett (QTcB), QTc Fridericia (QTcF) and RR interval of Central Cardiologist are reported. The assessments was performed at Baseline and W24. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Screening/Visit 1/W-6. (NCT00428090)
Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and up to W24

,,,
Interventionmilliseconds (MSEC) (Mean)
PR Interval, n=16,11, 14, 4QRS Duration, n=17, 11, 14, 5QT Interval, n=17, 11, 14, 5QTcB, n=17, 11, 14, 5QTcF, n=17, 11, 14, 5RR Interval
Donepezil 10 mg-5.50.915.9-0.24.976.5
Placebo2.21.15.310.28.1-12.3
RSG XR 2 mg6.90.715.67.110.043.8
RSG XR 8 mg6.03.619.820.020.1-0.5

Change From Baseline (W0) in Alzheimer's Carer's Quality of Life Instrument (ACQLI) Score at W12 and W24.

The ACQLI was an assessment of caregiver quality of life. This instrument consists of 30 questions exploring various aspects of carer's quality of life. Each of the questions had a two point response and the 30 questions were summed to provide a total score. Items are assumed to be unidimensional (i.e., represent a single variable) and are scored 0/1 (false/true) before summation into a total score with a 0-30 range. To ease comparisons between scales, ACQLI scores were transformed to range between 0-100 (100: worse). The assessments was performed at Baseline, W12 and W24. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0. Endpoint treatment differences which were adjusted to take account of missing data are derived. (NCT00428090)
Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and up to W24

,,,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
ACQLI, W12, n=141, 148, 137, 60ACQLI, W24, n=128, 132, 126, 54
Donepezil 10 mg0.5-0.0
Placebo0.50.6
RSG XR 2 mg-0.6-0.2
RSG XR 8 mg-0.10.0

Change From Baseline (W0) in Body Weight

Body weight will be measured at all visits, without shoes and wearing light clothing. The assessments was performed at Baseline, W4, W8, W12, W16, and W24. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0. (NCT00428090)
Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and up to W24

,,,
InterventionKilogram (Kg) (Mean)
Week 4, n=160, 161, 153, 79Week 8, n=150, 157, 147, 66Week 12, n=143, 149, 136, 61Week 16, n=143, 146, 132, 61Week 24, 133, 132, 125, 55
Donepezil 10 mg-0.1-0.4-0.9-1.0-0.8
Placebo0.1-0.00.0-0.0-0.3
RSG XR 2 mg0.40.50.60.70.8
RSG XR 8 mg0.30.80.91.10.8

Change From Baseline (W0) in Hematocrit

Hematology parameters were assessed at Baseline, W4, W12 and W24. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0. (NCT00428090)
Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and Up to W24

,,,
InterventionPercentage of red blood cells in blood (Mean)
Week 4, n=152, 152, 138, 76Week 12, n=132, 142, 132, 60Week 24, n=128, 124, 115, 54
Donepezil 10 mg-0.0024-0.0055-0.0001
Placebo-0.0011-0.0007-0.0010
RSG XR 2 mg-0.0088-0.0152-0.0123
RSG XR 8 mg-0.0125-0.0316-0.0326

Change From Baseline (W0) in Hemoglobin

Hematology parameters were assessed at Baseline, W4, W12 and W24. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0. (NCT00428090)
Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and up to W24

,,,
InterventionGrams per liter (G/L) (Mean)
Week 4, n=152, 152, 138, 76Week 12, n=132, 142, 132, 60Week 24, n=128, 124, 115, 54
Donepezil 10 mg-0.4-0.60.2
Placebo0.1-0.2-1.3
RSG XR 2 mg-2.8-4.5-4.2
RSG XR 8 mg-3.9-10.5-11.9

Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean ADAS-Cog Total Score at W8, W16, W24

The 11-item ADAS-Cog assessed a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Most items were evaluated by tests, but some were dependent on clinician ratings on a 5-point scale. Scores ranged from 0-70 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline is defined as value at W0. Endpoint treatment differences were adjusted to take account of missing data. It was evaluated at Baseline, W8, W16 and W24. (NCT00428090)
Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and up to W24

,,,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
ADAS-Cog, W8, n=153, 155,147,67ADAS-Cog, W16, n=143,145,132,62ADAS-Cog, W24, n=131, 130,125,156
Donepezil 10 mg-0.3-1.10.6
Placebo0.40.52.0
RSG XR 2 mg-0.50.61.2
RSG XR 8 mg0.51.31.2

Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean CIBIC+ Global Functioning Total Score at W8, W16, W24

The CIBIC+ assessment comprised of a 7-point rating of severity (at baseline) and change (at indicated time points). It was rated on a scale of 1 to 7 as 1: markedly improved, 2.: moderately improved, 3: minimally improved, 4: no change, 5: minimally worse, 6: moderately worse and 7: markedly worse; higher score means more dysfunction. The scale was based on interviews with the par. and caregiver and was completed by an independent rater. It required separate structured 15-20 minute interviews with the par. and caregiver. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0. Endpoint treatment differences which were adjusted to take account of missing data are derived. It was evaluated at Baseline, W8, W16 and W24. (NCT00428090)
Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and up to W24

,,,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
CIBIC+, W8, n=150, 156,147,67CIBIC+, W16, n=144,145,127,61CIBIC+, W24, n=131,133, 127, 56
Donepezil 10 mg3.93.83.8
Placebo4.14.24.3
RSG XR 2 mg3.94.04.3
RSG XR 8 mg4.14.14.2

Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) Scale Total Score at W8, W16, W24

The DAD, assessed the ability of a par. to execute basic and instrumental activities of daily living (ADL) and leisure activities. The scale consists of 40 questions assessing basic and instrumental ADLs. This scale assesses a participants' ability to initiate, plan, and perform activities related to hygiene, dressing, continence, eating, meal preparation, telephoning, going on an outing, finance and correspondence, medications, leisure, and housework. Each item was scored as yes: 1, no: 0 and N/A: not applicable. Higher scores indicate less disability with a score of 100 indicating no disability and 0 indicating no functional ability. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0. The percentage score was calculated as (DAD total score/total number of applicable items) multiplied by 100. Endpoint treatment differences which were adjusted to take account of missing data are derived. (NCT00428090)
Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and up to W24

,,,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
DAD, W8, n=147,152, 144, 65DAD, W16, n=141,143,131,59DAD, W24, n=129,133,127,55
Donepezil 10 mg0.51.1-0.2
Placebo-0.8-2.6-3.7
RSG XR 2 mg-0.6-1.7-2.4
RSG XR 8 mg-0.3-1.7-3.8

Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean European Quality of Life -5 Dimensions Proxy Version (EQ-5D Proxy) Total Score at W12, W24 Assessed by Thermometer (Visual Analog Scale [VAS])

The EQ-5D Proxy is a 2 part scale used to assess the quality of life and utility benefit. The data for Part 2 is presented. It is a the visual analogue scale Thermometer which assessed caregiver's impression of par. overall health. The Thermometer has endpoints of 100 (best imaginable health state) and 0 (worst imaginable health state). EQ-5D Proxy assessments was performed at Baseline, W12 and W24. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0. Endpoint treatment differences which were adjusted to take account of missing data are derived. (NCT00428090)
Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and up to W24

,,,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
EQ-5D Proxy Thermometer, W12, n=141, 146, 135, 62EQ-5D Proxy Thermometer, W24, n=128, 130, 126, 55
Donepezil 10 mg-2.61.5
Placebo1.41.9
RSG XR 2 mg0.3-0.7
RSG XR 8 mg1.70.2

Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean European Quality of Life -5 Dimensions Proxy Version (EQ-5D Proxy) Total Score at W12, W24 Assessed by Utility

The EQ-5D Proxy was a 2 part scale used to assess the quality of life and utility benefit. The data for Part 1 is presented. It is a 5 dimensional Health State Classification. Caregivers were asked to respond as they feel the par. would on dimensions of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Answers to each question were recorded on a 3-point scale which indicates the level of impairment (level 1= no problem; level 2=some or moderate problem(s) and level 3=unable, or extreme problem with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction. EQ-5D Proxy assessments was performed at Baseline, W12 and W24. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0. Endpoint treatment differences which were adjusted to take account of missing data are derived. (NCT00428090)
Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and up to W24

,,,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
EQ-5D Proxy Utility, W12, n=141,146, 135, 62EQ-5D Proxy Utility, W24, n=128, 130, 125, 55
Donepezil 10 mg0.010.00
Placebo-0.02-0.02
RSG XR 2 mg0.000.02
RSG XR 8 mg0.01-0.02

Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score at W8, W16, W24

"The NPI assessed behavioral disturbances comprises 10 dimensions: delusions, hallucinations, dysphoria, apathy, euphoria, disinhibition, aggressiveness and agitation, irritability, anxiety and aberrant motor activity. The par. caregiver asked about behavior in the par. If Yes, the informant then rates both the severity on a 3-point scale, 1: mild to 3: severe (total range: 0-36) and the frequency using a 4-point scale, 1: occasionally to 4: very frequently. The total domain score was frequency × severity. The distress was scored on 5-point scale, 0: no distress to 5 - very severe or extreme. A total NPI score can be calculated by adding all domain scores together; NPI total score: from 0-144 and NPI distress score: from 0-60, all with higher scores indicating more severe behavioral disturbance. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0." (NCT00428090)
Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and up to W24

,,,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
NPI, W8, n=146,151,144,65NPI, W16, n=139,142,131,59NPI, W24, n=129,133,127,55
Donepezil 10 mg-0.10.5-0.6
Placebo0.2-0.11.2
RSG XR 2 mg0.1-0.01.6
RSG XR 8 mg0.5-0.11.1

Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean Short Term Memory Assessment Total Score (ADAS-Cog Q1 Plus Q7) at W8, W16, W24

Change from Baseline in short term memory assessment score was assessed from a combined analysis of items 1 (word recall task) and 7 (word recognition task) of ADAS-Cog scale. Word recall task consist of the participants score was the mean number of words not recalled on three trials (maximum score 10) and word recognition task, to score this item the number of incorrect responses was counted (maximum error score was 12). Higher score indicating greater dysfunction. Total score is sum of individual score. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0. Endpoint treatment differences which were adjusted to take account of missing data are derived. (NCT00428090)
Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and up to W24

,,,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
ADAS-Cog Q1 plus Q7, W8, n=152,155,146,67ADAS-Cog Q1 plus Q7, W16, n=143,143,130,62ADAS-Cog Q1 plus Q7, W24, n=131,128,123,56
Donepezil 10 mg-0.4-0.60.2
Placebo0.10.10.7
RSG XR 2 mg-0.10.60.3
RSG XR 8 mg0.50.80.6

Change From Baseline (W0) in Periodic HbA1c Assessment

HbA1c assessment was performed par. with type 2 diabetes mellitus or HbA1c >=6.5% at Screening only. HbA1c levels were assessed at Baseline, W12 and W24. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0. (NCT00428090)
Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and up to W24

,,,
InterventionPercentage (Mean)
Week 12, n=48, 46, 38, 22Week 24, n=123, 120, 117, 52
Donepezil 10 mg-0.20.0
Placebo-0.10.1
RSG XR 2 mg0.20.2
RSG XR 8 mg0.10.1

Number of Par. With Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment

Clinical chemistry parameters were identified as of PCC (H, L), if values were out of RR: Alanine aminotransferase (ALT, none-120 [250% upper limit of RR, ULRR]), Albumin (0.75-2), Aspartate aminotransferase (AST,none-105 (3-64y), 137.5 (65+y), >250%ULRR), Alkaline phosphatase (ALP,none-312.5 (20+y), >250%ULRR), blood urea nitrogen (BUN)/Creatinine ratio (none-1.25), BUN (none-11), Chloride (80-115), Calcium (0.75-1.25), Carbon dioxide (CO2, 15-40) content, Creatinine (22, <50% lower limit of RR [LLRR]-155, >125%ULRR), Creatine phosphokinase (CPK, none-1.25), Gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT,none-2.5), Glucose (3.6-7.8), High density lipoprotein (HDL,0.65-none), Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH,none-1.25), Low density lipoprotein (LDL,none-2), Magnesium (0.5-2), Potassium (3-5.5), Phosphorus inorganic (0.5-1.5), Sodium (130-150), Total protein (0.8-1.5), Total cholesterol (none-1.25), Total bilirubin (none-1.95), Triglycerides (none-9). Data for Creatinine clearance not reported. (NCT00428090)
Timeframe: Up to W24

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
ALT H, n=156, 162, 151, 77AST H, n=156, 162, 151, 77BUN/Creatinine ratio H, n=156, 162, 151, 77Cholesterol H, n=141, 148, 137, 62Creatinine H, n=156, 162, 151, 77CPK H, n=156, 162, 151, 77GGT H, n=156, 162, 151, 77Glucose H, n=156, 162, 151, 77Glucose L, n=156, 162, 151, 77LDL H, n=141, 147, 136, 62Phosphorus L, n=156, 162, 151, 77Potassium H, n=156, 162, 150, 77Sodium H, n=156, 162, 151, 77Sodium L, n=156, 162, 151, 77BUN H, n=156, 162, 151, 77Total Bilirubin H, n=156, 162, 151, 77
Donepezil 10 mg00913518110021250
Placebo228755212336040070
RSG XR 2 mg00817113119551020051
RSG XR 8 mg001929411094551201120

Number of Par. With Hematology Data of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment

Haematology parameters were identified as of PCC (high [H], low [L]), if the values were out of the reference range (RR). The range for parameters was: platelet (100AV-500AV), red blood cell (RBC, 0.8-1.2), hemoglobin (L: female [F]:10, male [M]:11; H: F:16.5-AV, M:18), hematocrit (0.8-1.2), white blood cell (WBC, 3-15), neutrophils (0.75-1.5), lymphocytes (0.75-1.5), monocytes (0.75-2), eosinophils (none-2), basophils (none-2), mean corpuscle volume (MCV, 0.8-1.2), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH, 0.8-1.2), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC, 0.8-1.2), red cell distribution width (RDW, 0.8-1.2). Data for mean platelet volume (reference range not established) not reported (NCT00428090)
Timeframe: Up to W24

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Eosinophils H, n=156, 161, 151, 72Hematocrit H, n=157, 161,151, 76Hematocrit L, n=157, 161,151, 76Hemoglobin H, n=157, 161,151, 76Hemoglobin L, n=157, 161,151, 76Lymphocytes L, n=156, 161,151, 76MCH H, n=157, 161,151, 76MCH L, n=157, 161,151, 76MCV L, n=156, 161,151, 76Monocytes H, n=156, 161,151, 76Monocytes L, n=156, 161,151, 76Platelet H, n=157, 160,150, 76Platelet L, n=157, 160,150, 76RDW H, n=157, 161,151, 76RBC L, n=157, 161,151, 76Total neutrophil H, n=156, 161, 151, 76Total neutrophil L, n=156, 161, 151, 76WBC H, n=157, 161,151, 76WBC L, n=157, 161,151, 76
Donepezil 10 mg0000001011400111310
Placebo2000020000912400204
RSG XR 2 mg01023201001001610504
RSG XR 8 mg101082000015001011717

Number of Participants With Adverse Events Defined by Severity

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE included significant or unexpected worsening or exacerbation of the condition/indication under study, exacerbation of a chronic or intermittent pre-existing condition, new conditions detected or diagnosed, signs, symptoms, or the clinical sequelae of a suspected overdose of either investigational product or a concurrent medication. Number of participants with any AE and as per severity were reported. Refer to the general AE/SAE module for a list of AEs and SAEs. (NCT00428090)
Timeframe: Up to W24

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any AEMild AEModerate AESevere AE
Donepezil 10 mg4222155
Placebo6232255
RSG XR 2 mg6035223
RSG XR 8 mg6937302

Number of Participants With Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (SBP and DBP), Heart Rate (HR) and Weight Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) Any Time on Treatment (ATOT).

SBP, DBP and HR of par. were recorded in sitting posture as vital signs, while body weight was measured without shoes and wearing light clothing at each visit. The blood pressure (BP) and HR values were identified as of PCC if the vales were out of the reference range (for SBP, 90 to 140 millimeters of mercury (mmHg), DBP, 50 to 90 mmHg, and HR >100 or <50 beats per minute [bpm]) or meet a change from Baseline criterion. For SBP it was increase from Baseline (high) if increased by more than or equal to (>=) 40 mmHg; decrease from Baseline (low) if decreased by >=30 mmHg. For DBP, increase from Baseline (high) if increased by >=30 mmHg; decrease from Baseline (low) if decreased by >=20 mmHg. For HR, increase from Baseline (high) if increased by >=30 bpm; decrease from Baseline (low) if decreased by >=30 bpm. For weight, increase from Baseline (high) if increased by >=7%; decrease from Baseline (low) if decreased by >=7%. Baseline was defined as value at W0. (NCT00428090)
Timeframe: Up to W24

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
SBP, >140 or <90SBP, Increase from Baseline >=40SBP, Decrease from Baseline >=30DBP, >90 or <50DBP, Increase from Baseline >=30DBP, Decrease from Baseline >=20HR, >100 or <50HR, Increase from Baseline >=30HR, Decrease from Baseline >=30Weight, Increase from Baseline >=7%Weight, Decrease from Baseline >=7%
Donepezil 10 mg243681821115
Placebo5217174821397
RSG XR 2 mg613916112430214
RSG XR 8 mg4131513125430253

Time Spent Caring for Basic and Instrumental Activities Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD) Scale at W12 and W24

The RUD instrument was developed as a comprehensive tool to assess the amount of resource use among demented par. RUD assess both formal and informal resource use of the par. and the primary caregiver, making it possible to calculate costs from a societal perspective. Q1 relates to assisting par. with basic activities of daily living and Q2 relates to instrumental activities of daily living. The assessments was performed at Baseline, W12 and W24. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0. Endpoint treatment differences which were adjusted to take account of missing data are derived. (NCT00428090)
Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and up to W24

,,,
InterventionHours (Mean)
RUD Q1, W12, n=141, 149, 137, 69RUD Q1, W24, n=128, 133, 127, 55RUD Q2, W12, n=141, 149, 137, 62RUD Q2, W24, n=128, 133, 127, 55
Donepezil 10 mg-5.73.7-5.31.1
Placebo2.319.413.717.1
RSG XR 2 mg4.5-0.69.09.7
RSG XR 8 mg-9.8-2.74.911.6

Percentage of Participants With AEs of Edema

Edema was considered as adverse event of special interest (AESI). The process for AESI selection was based on RSG's pharmacologic class and relevant AEs potentially associated with RSG. Percentage of participants reported with edema as AESI were reported. (NCT00550420)
Timeframe: Up to 82 Weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
RSG XR 8 mg13

Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) Total Score as a Function of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) 4 Status at W24 and W52

The 11-item ADAS-cog was used to assessed a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Most items were evaluated by tests, but some were dependent on clinician ratings on a five point scale. Scores ranged from 0 to 70 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction. Baseline was referred to Visit 1 (W0)assessments. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. (NCT00550420)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1, W0), W24 and W52

InterventionScore on scale (Mean)
All subject population, W24All subject population, W52APOE4, Neg, W24APOE4, Neg, W52APOEe4, Pos, W24APOEe4, Pos, W52
RSG XR 8 mg1.92.52.13.01.81.8

Change From Baseline in Body Weight (BW)

BW of participants were recorded as vital sign at each visit. The BW were identified as of potential clinical concern if the vales were increased or decreased from Baseline by >=7%. The Baseline assessments were referred to assessments at Visit 1 (W0). Change from Baseline was measured as the BW at specified visit minus the Baseline value. (NCT00550420)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1, W0), W4, W8, W12, W16, W24, W36, W52, W64 and Follow-up (W82)

InterventionKilograms (kg) (Mean)
BW, W4BW, W8BW, W12BW, W16BW, W24BW, W36BW, W52BW, Year 2 W12BW, Follow-up
RSG XR 8 mg0.20.40.50.50.60.5-0.00.50.5

Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score as a Function of APOEe 4 Status

The DAD, assessed the ability of a participant to execute basic and instrumental activities of daily living (ADL) and leisure activities. The scale consists of 40 questions assessing basic and instrumental ADLs. This scale assesses a participant's ability to initiate, plan, and perform activities related to hygiene, dressing, continence, eating, meal preparation, telephoning, going on an outing, finance and correspondence, medications, leisure, and housework. Each item was scored as yes: 1, no: 0 and N/A: not applicable. Higher scores indicate less disability with a score of 100 indicating no disability and 0 indicating no functional ability. The percentage score was calculated as (DAD total score/total number of applicable items) multiplied by 100. The DAD was conducted as an interview with the caregiver and took approximately 20 minutes. Baseline was referred to Visit 1 (W0) assessments. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. (NCT00550420)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1, W0), W24 and W52

InterventionScore on scale (Mean)
All subject population, W24All subject population, W52APOEe4, Neg, W24APOEe4, Neg, W52APOEe4, Pos, W24APOEe4, Pos, W52
RSG XR 8 mg-3.2-5.2-4.5-6.2-2.2-3.8

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c)

HbA1c was evaluated as safety parameter in this study. The values of change from Baseline was presented. The Baseline assessments were referred to assessments at Visit 1 (W0). Change from Baseline was measured as the BW at specified visit minus the Baseline value. (NCT00550420)
Timeframe: Baseline (Vsit 1 W0), W12, W24, W36, W52, W76 and Follow-up (W82)

InterventionPercent HbA1c (Mean)
W12W24W36W52W76Follow-up
RSG XR 8 mg-0.020.080.030.090.080.07

Change From Baseline in Heart Rate (HR)

HR of participants was recorded as vital sign at each visit. The HR values were identified as of potential clinical concern if the vales were out of the reference range 50 to 100 beats per minute (BPM) or meet a change from Baseline criterion. The change from Baseline criterion was as, increase in HR (high) from Baseline if HR was increased by >= 30 bpm or decrease in HR (Low) from Baseline if HR was decreased by >= 30 bpm from Baseline. The Baseline assessments were referred to assessments at Visit 1 (W 0). Change from Baseline was measured as the HR at specified visit minus the Baseline value. (NCT00550420)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1, W0), W4, W8, W12, W16, W24, W36, W52, W64 and Follow-up (W82)

InterventionBPM (Mean)
HR, W4HR, W8HR, W12HR, W16HR, W24HR, W36HR, W52HR, Year 2 W12HR, Follow-up
RSG XR 8mg1.11.82.21.21.01.7-0.82.91.6

Change From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score as a Function of APOE 4 Status at W24 and W52

The MMSE consisted of 11 tests of orientation, memory (recent and immediate), concentration, language and praxis. Scores range from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment. The scale was completed by the investigator, based on the performance of the participant, and took approximately 5 to 10 minutes to administer. Change from parent Baseline in MMSE was analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). Baseline was referred to Visit 1 (W0)assessments. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. (NCT00550420)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1, W0), W 24 and W52

InterventionScore on scale (Mean)
All subject population, W24All subject population, W52APOEe4, Neg, W24APOEe4, Neg, W52APOEe4, Pos, W24APOEe4, Pos, W52
RSG XR 8 mg-0.7-1.6-0.7-1.2-0.7-2.1

Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score as a Function of APOE 4 Status at W24 and W52

"The NPI assessed behavioural disturbances comprises 10 dimensions: delusions, hallucinations, dysphoria, apathy, euphoria, disinhibition, aggressiveness and agitation, irritability, anxiety and aberrant motor activity. The participant caregiver asked about behaviour in the participant. If Yes, the informant then rates both the severity on a 3-point scale, 1: mild to 3: severe (total range: 0-36) and the frequency using a 4-point scale, 1: occasionally to 4: very frequently. The total domain score was frequency × severity. The distress was scored on 5-point scale, 0: no distress to 5 - very severe or extreme. A total NPI score was calculated by adding all domain scores together: NPI total score (from 0-144) and NPI distress score (from 0-60), with higher scores indicating more severe behavioral disturbance. Baseline was referred to Visit 1 (W0) assessments. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value." (NCT00550420)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1, W0), W24 and W52

InterventionScore on scale (Mean)
All subject population, W24All subject population, W52APOEe4, Neg, W24APOEe4, Neg, W52APOEe4, Pos, W24APOEe4, Pos, W52
RSG XR 8 mg1.12.11.91.50.42.8

Change From Baseline in Non-fasting Measures of Lipid Metabolism Including Total Cholesterol, High Density Lipoprotein, Low Density Lipoprotein and Triglycerides at Indicated Timepoints.

Non-fasting measures of lipid metabolism including cholesterol (TC), high density lipoprotein (HDL), low density lipoprotein (LDL), triglycerides (TG) were measured at Baseline (W0), W4, W16, W36, W52, Year 2 W24 and Follow-up. The Baseline assessments were referred to assessments at Visit 1 (W0). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at the indicated visit minus the Baseline value. (NCT00550420)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1, W0), W4, W16, W36, W52, W76, and W82

InterventionMillimoles per litre (Mean)
TC, W4TC, W16TC, W36TC, W52TC, Year 2 W24TC, Follow-upHDL, W4HDL, W16HDL, W36HDL, W52HDL, Year 2 W24HDL, Follow-upLDL, W4LDL, W16LDL, W36LDL, W52LDL, Year 2 W24LDL, Follow-upTG, W4TG, W16TG, W36TG, W52TG, Year 2 W24TG, Follow-up
RSG XR 8 mg0.1060.2000.1400.3331.1630.069-0.035-0.030-0.069-0.020-0.150-0.0570.0880.2110.1630.3851.0510.1330.0840.0270.050-0.1790.573-0.062

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

SBP and DBP of participant were recorded in sitting posture as vital sign at each visit. The blood pressure (BP) values were identified as of potential clinical concern if the vales were out of the reference range (for SBP, 90 to 140 mmHg and DBP, 50 to 90 mmHg) or meet a change from Baseline criterion. The change from Baseline criterion for SBP, was increase from Baseline (high) if increased by more than or equal to (>=) 40 mmHg from Baseline; decrease from Baseline (low) if decreased by >= 30 mmHg from Baseline. For DBP, increase form Baseline (high) if increased by >= 30 mmHg from Baseline; decrease from Baseline (low) if decreased by >= 20 mmHg from Baseline. The Baseline assessments were referred to assessments at Visit 1 (W 0). Change from Baseline was measured as the blood pressure value recorded at specified visit minus the Baseline value. (NCT00550420)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1, W0), W4, W8, W12, W16, W24, W36, W52, W64 and Follow-up (W82)

Interventionmillimeter of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
SBP, W4SBP, W8SBP, W12SBP, W16SBP, W24SBP, W36SBP, W52SBP, Year 2 W12SBP, Follow-upDBP, W4DBP, W8DBP, W12DBP, W16DBP, W24DBP, W36DBP, W52DBP, Year 2 W12DBP, Follow-up
RSG XR 8 mg-0.2-1.1-0.7-1.3-1.2-3.00.3-0.1-0.5-0.8-2.1-2.0-2.2-2.1-3.0-1.42.8-0.9

Mean Clinician Interview-Based Impression of Change Plus Caregiver Input (CIBIC+) Score as a Function of APOE 4 Status

The CIBIC+ score used for global functioning assessment. The CIBIC+ assessment comprised of a 7-point rating of severity. It was rated on a scale of 1 to 7 as 1: markedly improved, 2.: moderately improved, 3: minimally improved, 4: no change, 5: minimally worse, 6: moderately worse and 7: markedly worse; The lower score indicated betterment in functioning and higher score means greater dysfunction. The scale was based on interviews with the participant and the caregiver and was completed by an independent rater. (NCT00550420)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1, W0), W 24 and W 52

InterventionScore on scale (Mean)
All subject population, W24All subject population, W52APOEe4, Neg, W24APOEe4, Neg, W52APOEe4, Pos, W24APOEe4, Pos, W52
RSG XR 8 mg4.34.54.34.74.34.3

Number of Participants With Abnormal BW at Any Time During Treatment Period

BW of participants were recorded as vital sign at each visit. The BW were identified as of potential clinical concern if the vales were increased or decreased from Baseline by >=7%. The Baseline assessments were referred to assessments at Visit 1 (W0). Change from Baseline in BW was measured as the BW value at specified visit minus the Baseline BW value. Number of participants with abnormal BW at any time during treatment period were reported. (NCT00550420)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1, W0) to W 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Increase from Baseline >=7%Decrease from Baseline >=7%
RSG XR 8 mg3016

Number of Participants With Abnormal HR at Any Time During Treatment Period

HR of participants was recorded as vital sign at each visit. The HR values were identified as of potential clinical concern if the vales were out of the reference range 50 to 100 beats per minute (BPM) or meet a change from Baseline criterion. The change from Baseline criterion was as, increase in HR (high) from Baseline if HR was increased by >= 30 bpm or decrease in HR (Low) from Baseline if HR was decreased by >= 30 bpm from Baseline. The Baseline assessments were referred to assessments at Visit 1 (W 0). Change from Baseline was measured as the HR at specified visit minus the Baseline value. Number of participants with abnormal HR at any time during treatment period were reported. (NCT00550420)
Timeframe: Up to 82 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
HR, >100 or <50HR, Increase from baseline >=30
RSG XR 8 mg32

Number of Participants With Abnormal SBP and DBP at Any Time During Treatment Period

SBP and DBP of participant were recorded in sitting posture as vital sign at each visit. The blood pressure (BP) values were identified as of potential clinical concern if the vales were out of the reference range (for SBP, 90 to 140 mmHg and DBP, 50 to 90 mmHg) or meet a change from Baseline criterion. The change from Baseline criterion for SBP, was increase from Baseline (high) if increased by more than or equal to (>=) 40 mmHg from Baseline; decrease from Baseline (low) if decreased by >= 30 mmHg from Baseline. For DBP, increase form Baseline (high) if increased by >= 30 mmHg from Baseline; decrease from Baseline (low) if decreased by >= 20 mmHg from Baseline. The Baseline assessments were referred to assessments at Visit 1 (W 0). Change from Baseline was measured as the blood pressure value recorded at specified visit minus the Baseline value. (NCT00550420)
Timeframe: Up to 82 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SBP, >140 or <90,SBP, Increase from Baseline >=40,SBP, Decrease from Baseline >=30,DBP, >90 or <50,DBP, Increase from Baseline >=30,DBP, Decrease from Baseline >=20,
RSG XR 8 mg8482223231

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) and Severity of AEs

AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. The drug related-AEs of special interest (AESI) was reported. The severity of the AESI was categorized as mild, moderate and severe. Number of participants with AEs were reported for treatment duration of the study. (NCT00550420)
Timeframe: Up to Week 82

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any AEsTotal Drug-Related AESIMild AESIModerate AESISevere AESI
RSG XR 8mg1254631132

Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters of Potential Clinical Concern

The clinical chemistry parameters including alanine amino transferase (ALT), aldolase, aspartate amino transferase (AST), blood urea nitrogen /creatinine (BUN/Creat) ratio, cholesterol (Chol), creatine kinase, creatinine, direct bilirubin, gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), glucose, high density lipid (HDL), low density lipid (LDL), potassium, troponin 1, and urea were assessed as safety parameters. The number of participants with values outside the reference range (potential clinical concern ) at any time on treatment (ATOT) and follow-up period were reported. The treatment period was till W104 followed by 6 weeks of follow-up period till W110 of study. (NCT00550420)
Timeframe: Up to 82 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ALT, ATOT, HighALT, Follow-up, HighAldolase, ATOT, HighAldolase, ATOT, LowAldolase, Follow-up, LowAST, ATOT, HighAST, Follow-up, HighBUN/Creat ratio, ATOT, HighBUN/Creat ratio, Follow-up, HighChol, ATOT, HighChol, Follow-up, HighCreatine Kinase, ATOT, HighCreatine Kinase, Follow-up, HighCreatinin, ATOT, HighCreatinin, Follow-up, HighDirect Bilirubin, ATOT, HighGGT, ATOT, HighGGT, Follow-up, HighGlucose, ATOT, HighGlucose, ATOT, LowGlucose, Follow-up, HighHDL, ATOT, LowLDL, ATOT, HighLDL, Follow-up, HighPotassium, ATOT, HighPotassium, ATOT, LowTroponin I, ATOT, HighUrea, ATOT, HighUrea, Follow-up, High
RSG XR 8 mg113732118152133274513081421958113545412197

Number of Participants With Hematological Parameters of Potential Clinical Concern

The hematological parameters including eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, platelet count, Segmented Neutrophils, total neutrophils, white blood cell (WBC), red blood cell (RBC) counts, hemoglobin, hematocrit count, mean corpuscle hemoglobin (MCH) and mean corpuscle volume (MCV) were analyzed as safety parameters. The number of participants with values outside the reference range (potential clinical concern ) at any time on treatment (ATOT) and follow-up period were reported. The treatment period was till W104 followed by 6 weeks of follow-up period till W110 of study. (NCT00550420)
Timeframe: Up to 82 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Eosinophils, ATOT, HighHematocrit, ATOT, LowHematocrit, Follow-up, LowHemoglobin, ATOT, HighHemoglobin, ATOT, LowHemoglobin, Follow-Up, LowLymphocytes, ATOT, LowLymphocytes, Follow-Up, LowMCH, ATOT, HighMCH, Follow-Up, HighMCV, ATOT, HighMCV, Follow-Up, HighMonocytes, ATOT, LowMonocytes, ATOT, HighPlatelet count, ATOT, HighPlatelet count, ATOT, LowRed Cell Distribution Width, ATOT, HighRed Cell Distribution Width,Follow-up, HighRed Blood Cell count, ATOT, LowRed Blood Cell count, Follow-up, LowSegmented Neutrophils, ATOT, HighSegmented Neutrophils, ATOT, LowSegmented Neutrophils, Follow-up, LowTotal Neutrophils, ATOT, HighTotal Neutrophils, ATOT, LowTotal Neutrophils, Follow-Up, LowWBC, ATOT, Low
RSG XR 8 mg12112085311111751230844114211429

Number of Participants With Serious AEs and Deaths

A serious adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, life-threatening condition, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability or incapacity, or a congenital anomaly or birth defect. The SAEs and deaths are reported from Visit 1 (W0) till end of the follow-up period (W110) (NCT00550420)
Timeframe: Up to Week 82

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any SAEDeath
RSG XR 8 mg83

Trials

1 trial available for donepezil and Edema

ArticleYear
Rosiglitazone monotherapy in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study.
    Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders, 2010, Volume: 30, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alleles; Alzheimer Disease; Apolipoproteins E; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; D

2010
Rosiglitazone monotherapy in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study.
    Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders, 2010, Volume: 30, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alleles; Alzheimer Disease; Apolipoproteins E; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; D

2010
Rosiglitazone monotherapy in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study.
    Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders, 2010, Volume: 30, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alleles; Alzheimer Disease; Apolipoproteins E; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; D

2010
Rosiglitazone monotherapy in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study.
    Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders, 2010, Volume: 30, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alleles; Alzheimer Disease; Apolipoproteins E; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; D

2010
Rosiglitazone monotherapy in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study.
    Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders, 2010, Volume: 30, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alleles; Alzheimer Disease; Apolipoproteins E; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; D

2010
Rosiglitazone monotherapy in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study.
    Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders, 2010, Volume: 30, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alleles; Alzheimer Disease; Apolipoproteins E; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; D

2010
Rosiglitazone monotherapy in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study.
    Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders, 2010, Volume: 30, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alleles; Alzheimer Disease; Apolipoproteins E; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; D

2010
Rosiglitazone monotherapy in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study.
    Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders, 2010, Volume: 30, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alleles; Alzheimer Disease; Apolipoproteins E; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; D

2010
Rosiglitazone monotherapy in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study.
    Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders, 2010, Volume: 30, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alleles; Alzheimer Disease; Apolipoproteins E; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; D

2010