diospyros has been researched along with Food-Hypersensitivity* in 3 studies
3 other study(ies) available for diospyros and Food-Hypersensitivity
Article | Year |
---|---|
Anaphylaxis in a child after ingestion of persimmon.
Topics: Anaphylaxis; Anti-Allergic Agents; Biomarkers; Child; Diospyros; Food Hypersensitivity; Fruit; Humans; Immunoglobulin E; Intradermal Tests; Male; Predictive Value of Tests; Risk Factors | 2015 |
Facial rash and palmoplantar pruritus in an infant after first contact with kaki.
Topics: Allergens; Diospyros; Exanthema; Food Hypersensitivity; Foot; Fruit; Hand; Humans; Immunoglobulin E; Infant; Male; Pruritus; Skin Tests | 2009 |
Severe allergy to sharon fruit caused by birch pollen.
Allergy to sharon fruit (persimmon) has been only rarely reported. Cross-reactivity with pollen (profilin and Bet v 6) appeared to be involved, but Bet v 1 has not been implicated previously.. It is our aim to identify whether Bet v 1 sensitization is linked to sharon fruit allergy.. Two patients with a reaction upon first exposure to sharon fruit were included in the study, as well as 7 patients with birch-pollen-related apple allergy. Sensitivity was assessed by skin prick testing (SPT), a radio-allergosorbent test (RAST) and immunoblotting. RAST analysis was performed for Bet v 1, Bet v 2 and Bet v 6. Cross-reactivity was evaluated by RAST and immunoblot inhibitions. Biological activity of IgE was measured by basophil histamine release. Sharon fruit allergy was evaluated by double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) or open challenge (OC).. Both sharon-fruit-allergic patients demonstrated positive reactions in the RAST (8.6 and 6.2 IU/ml, respectively) and SPT (wheal area 37 and 36 mm2). Sharon fruit allergy was confirmed by DBPCFC in 1 patient. The second patient refused a challenge because of the severe initial reaction. Sera from both patients were reactive to Bet v 1 and Bet v 6, which was cross-reactive with sharon fruit by inhibition assays. The patient with the severest reactions was reactive to profilin on immunoblotting. However, profilin did not induce significant histamine release, nor did Bet v 6. Bet v 1 induce approximately 60% histamine release. An OC with sharon fruit in 7 patients allergic to birch pollen and apple, who had not eaten sharon fruit previously, was positive in 6/7 cases.. Birch-pollen-related allergy to sharon fruit is mediated by the known cross-reactive pollen allergens including Bet v 1 and may become more of a problem should sharon fruit consumption increase. Topics: Adult; Betula; Contractile Proteins; Cross Reactions; Diospyros; Double-Blind Method; Female; Food Hypersensitivity; Fruit; Histamine Release; Humans; Immunoblotting; Immunoglobulin E; Male; Microfilament Proteins; Netherlands; Pollen; Profilins; Radioallergosorbent Test; Skin Tests | 2005 |