digoxin and Diabetic-Angiopathies

A multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind trial compared the preventive effect of aprindine and digoxin on the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) with placebo, and also compare the effectiveness of these 2 drugs in the prevention of AF. Patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF who had converted to sinus rhythm (SR) were randomly assigned aprindine (40 mg/day), digoxin (0.25 mg/day) or placebo and followed up on an outpatient basis every 2 weeks for 6 months. Of the 141 patients from 36 participating centers, 47 were given aprindine, 47 digoxin, and 47 were on placebo. After the 6-month follow-up, the Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of patients remaining free of recurrent symptomatic AF on aprindine, digoxin and placebo were 33.3%, 29.2% and 21.5%, respectively. In patients remaining in SR for 15 days after from the start of follow-up, freedom from recurrence was significantly more prevalent in the aprindine group than in the placebo group (p=0.0414), but there was no significant difference between the digoxin and placebo groups. The rate of adverse events was similar in the 3 groups. In conclusion, neither aprindine nor digoxin had a significant effect on preventing relapse of symptomatic AF; however, recurrence of AF occurred later with aprindine than with placebo or digoxin.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Aprindine; Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary Disease; Diabetic Angiopathies; Digoxin; Double-Blind Method; Electric Countershock; Female; Heart Valve Diseases; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Placebos; Safety; Time Factors

We defined the prevalence and impact on survival of clinical bedside variables in 385 patients with symptomatic congestive heart failure (CHF), of whom there were 176 with and 209 without diabetes mellitus. Patients were consecutively hospitalized and admitted for various acute conditions. Following discharge all-cause mortality was recorded. Prevalence and association of various variables with mortality were statistically analyzed. Prevailing in the diabetics versus nondiabetics were younger age (p < 0.05), pulmonary edema on admission (p = 0.002), using furosemide > 80 mg/day (p < 0.01) for > 1 year (p < 0.01) and hyponatremia (p = 0.01). Less prevalent were chronic lung disease (p < 0.01) and cardiac arrhythmias (p = 0.001). On follow-up extending up to 60 months, diabetic patients, especially those with fasting blood glucose levels on admission > or = 180 mg/dl, survived for a shorter period of time than nondiabetics (p = 0.02). Associated with increased mortality in the diabetic group were female gender (p = 0.04), furosemide > or = 80 mg/day (p < 0.001) and renal dysfunction (RD; p = 0.04). The respective variables in the nondiabetics were advanced age (p < 0.001) and RD (p = 0.002). Although they were younger, diabetic patients presented more severe CHF. It is recommended that special attention should be given to diabetic females, those using higher furosemide dosages and those suffering from RD.

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Calcium Channel Blockers; Cardiotonic Agents; Diabetic Angiopathies; Digoxin; Diuretics; Female; Furosemide; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Prevalence; Prognosis; Risk Factors; Survival Analysis

This prospective hospital-based, case-control study compares the outcome of unstable angina in non-insulin dependent diabetic patients and non-diabetic control subjects. One hundred and sixty-two diabetic patients and 162 non-diabetic control patients with unstable angina were entered into the study. The 3-month mortality was 8.6% (95% confidence interval, CI = 4.4-12.9%) in diabetic patients and 2.5% (CI = 0.1-4.9%) in control patients (p = 0.014). The 1-year mortality was 16.7% (CI = 10.9%-22.4%) in diabetic patients and 8.6% (CI = 4.4%-12.9%) in non-diabetic patients (p = 0.029). Diabetic patients received beta-blockade and underwent coronary angiography and angioplasty less frequently than controls; the frequency of unstable angina, of acute myocardial infarction, and coronary artery bypass grafting was similar in both groups at 1 year of follow-up. It is concluded that diabetic patients with unstable angina have a higher mortality than non-diabetic patients and that this difference is largely accounted for by early (first 3 months) mortality.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angina, Unstable; Angioplasty; Aspirin; Calcium Channel Blockers; Case-Control Studies; Confidence Intervals; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Disease; Diabetic Angiopathies; Digoxin; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Nitrates; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Time Factors

Substances with digoxin- and ouabain-like immunoactivity (DLIA) are specific inhibitors of Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase which increase the total amount of intracellular stored calcium (Ca2+i). In diabetic patients, DLIA levels have been reported to be increased. Although this increase is probably secondary to sodium retention and volume expansion (included in diabetic subjects by hyperinsulinemia and/or diabetic nephropathy), the question arises of whether it has pathophysiological consequences: namely, whether substances with DLIA, via their effect on Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase activity and Ca2+i stores, could in diabetic subjects facilitate development of hypertension and/or modulate insulin sensitivity or insulin secretion. Clinical findings of correlations of DLIA to blood pressure, insulin levels and to degree of insulin resistance, together with experimental findings of decreased Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase activity, increased Ca2+i and decreased Mg2+i in both diabetic and hypertensive subjects, support these hypotheses. However, the issue of whether or not these relations are causative and whether or not defects in intracellular milieu are primary or secondary to non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus has not been resolved yet. Moreover, pathogenesis of both diabetes mellitus and hypertension is multifactorial and includes many other factors. Therefore, further efforts should be made to elucidate the exact role of substances with DLIA in diabetes mellitus.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Diabetic Nephropathies; Digoxin; Glucose; Humans; Hyperinsulinism; Hypertension; Immunoassay; Insulin; Insulin Secretion; Models, Biological; Ouabain

The aim of this study was to compare the intensity of typical late complications in diabetic patients (n = 65, 28 type I, 37 type II) who were not on glycoside drugs with low vs. high serum levels of digoxin-like immunoreactive factor (DLIF: group I, n = 42, DLIF < or = the detection limit of 0.2 ng ml-1; and group II, n = 23, mean +/- SEM: 1.17 +/- 0.31 [0.25-4.96] ng ml-1). For detection of nephropathy, urinary albumin excretion (24 h) and creatinine clearance tests were used. For coronary heart disease a questionnaire and standard ECG; for peripheral occlusive vascular disease a questionnaire; for eye disease a fundoscopy; for neuropathy a neurological score system; and for autonomic neuropathy a standardized test battery was employed. Patients with high DLIF levels showed better test results in vibratory perception (95.7 +/- 1.5 vs. 82.8 +/- 3.8%, normal finding = 100%, 2p = 0.016), had better percentile localizations concerning maximal pupillary area in darkness (28.4 +/- 6.6 vs. 8.1 +/- 1.8%, 2p = 0.0004), contraction velocity at 1 s (21.5 +/- 5.8 vs. 8.0 +/- 2.2%, 2p = 0.012), and dilation velocity at 6 s (23.0 +/- 6.8 vs. 10.5 +/- 2.5%, 2p = 0.041), had less retinopathy (with retinopathy: 26.1% vs. 64.3%, 2p = 0.0028), and better percentile localizations in the respiratory sinus arrhythmia test (68.4 +/- 7.3 vs. 44.1 +/- 4.9%, 2p = 0.0064). There was no difference concerning nephropathy, blood pressure, coronary heart disease and peripheral vascular disease. Separate analysis according to the type of diabetes confirmed the results in each group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Proteins; Cardenolides; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Diabetic Nephropathies; Diabetic Neuropathies; Diabetic Retinopathy; Digoxin; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Saponins; Severity of Illness Index

To determine whether digoxin protects the myocardium during the initial phases of hypertension and diabetes combined, adult male Wistar rats with two-kidney, one-clip renal hypertension and streptozotocin-induced diabetes mellitus were treated with digoxin (500 micrograms.kg-1.day-1) by gavage for 10 wk immediately after the onset of hypertension and diabetes. Systemic arterial blood pressures, ventricular pressures, the first time derivative of left ventricular pressure, diastolic wall stress, and the quantitative analysis of the number and distribution of myocardial lesions and capillary density of the myocardium were measured. In comparison to untreated hypertensive-diabetic animals, digoxin-treated rats showed a lesser elevation in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and diastolic and systolic wall stress despite comparable degrees of hypertension and blood glucose levels. In addition, chamber diameter was smaller and the diffusion distance for oxygen was within normal values in animals treated with this glycoside. However, the numerical density of the foci of replacement fibrosis was similar to that found in untreated hypertensive-diabetic animals. In conclusion, digoxin reduces the magnitude of ventricular remodeling and diastolic wall stress in this model of hypertension and diabetes.

Topics: Animals; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Diabetic Angiopathies; Digoxin; Heart Rate; Hypertension, Renal; Male; Mathematics; Models, Cardiovascular; Myocardial Contraction; Myocardium; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Reference Values; Ventricular Function, Left