digoxin and Critical-Illness

New-onset of atrial fibrillation (NOAF) in critically ill patients is the most common acute cardiac dysrhythmia, but evidence-based data regarding treatment strategies are scarce. In this retrospective monocentric study, we compared effectiveness of amiodarone versus digitalis for heart rate control in critically ill patients with new-onset of atrial fibrillation. We identified a total of 209 patients for the main analysis. Amiodarone as compared to digitalis was associated with a clinically relevant faster time to heart rate control < 110 bpm (2 h (IQR: 1 h to 6 h) versus 4 h (2 h to 12 h); p = 0.003) and longer durations of sinus rhythm during the first 24 h of treatment (6 h (IQR: 6 h to 22 h) versus 0 h (IQR: 0 h to 16 h); p < 0.001). However, more bradycardic episodes occurred in association with amiodarone than with digitalis (7.7% versus 3.4%; p = 0.019). Use of amiodarone was associated with an increase of noradrenalin infusion rate compared to digitalis (23.9% versus 12.0%; p = 0.019). Within the tertile of patients with the highest CRP measurements, amiodarone treated patients presented with a higher decrease in heart rate than digoxin treated patients. Clinical trials comparing different NOAF treatment strategies are much needed and should report on concomitant sympathetic activity and inflammatory status.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amiodarone; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Critical Illness; Digitalis; Digoxin; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Inflammation; Male; Middle Aged; Propensity Score; Retrospective Studies; Sepsis; Treatment Outcome

Atrial fibrillation (AF) with rapid ventricular response frequently complicates the management of critically ill patients with sepsis and may necessitate the initiation of medication to avoid hemodynamic compromise. However, the optimal medication to achieve rate control for AF with rapid ventricular response in sepsis is unclear.. What is the comparative effectiveness of frequently used AF medications (β-blockers, calcium channel blockers, amiodarone, and digoxin) on heart rate (HR) reduction among critically ill patients with sepsis and AF with rapid ventricular response?. We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study among patients with sepsis and AF with rapid ventricular response (HR > 110 beats/min). We compared the rate control effectiveness of β-blockers to calcium channel blockers, amiodarone, and digoxin using multivariate-adjusted, time-varying exposures in competing risk models (for death and addition of another AF medication), adjusting for fixed and time-varying confounders.. Among 666 included patients, 50.6% initially received amiodarone, 10.1% received a β-blocker, 33.8% received a calcium channel blocker, and 5.6% received digoxin. The adjusted hazard ratio for HR of < 110 beats/min by 1 h was 0.50 (95% CI, 0.34-0.74) for amiodarone vs β-blocker, 0.37 (95% CI, 0.18-0.77) for digoxin vs β-blocker, and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.51-1.11) for calcium channel blocker vs β-blocker. By 6 h, the adjusted hazard ratio for HR < 110 beats/min was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.47-0.97) for amiodarone vs β-blocker, 0.60 (95% CI, 0.36-1.004) for digoxin vs β-blocker, and 1.03 (95% CI, 0.71-1.49) for calcium channel blocker vs β-blocker.. In a large cohort of patients with sepsis and AF with rapid ventricular response, a β-blocker treatment strategy was associated with improved HR control at 1 h, but generally similar HR control at 6 h compared with amiodarone, calcium channel blocker, or digoxin.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Amiodarone; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Calcium Channel Blockers; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Critical Illness; Digoxin; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Sepsis; United States

The management of digoxin therapy using pharmacokinetics in a patient undergoing continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) is reported.. A 46-year-old African-American woman with New York Heart Association class IV, American College of Cardiology- American Heart Association stage D heart failure arrived from an outside facility with complaints of dyspnea after minimal exertion, orthopnea, and lower-extremity edema. A transthoracic echocardiogram revealed an estimated left ventricular ejection fraction of 15%. The patient subsequently required left ventricular assist device placement on hospital day 5 as a potential bridge to transplantation. A total digoxin loading dose of 500 μg i.v. (8.2 μg/kg) was given in two divided doses six hours apart. The next morning, the serum digoxin concentration was 1.9 ng/mL, and the patient was started on a maintenance digoxin dosage of 125 μg i.v. daily. On postoperative day (POD) 20, the patient developed acute kidney injury, and CVVH was initiated. The sieving coefficient (Sc), transmembrane clearance (CLtm), digoxin concentration in ultrafiltration fluid (Cuf), and need for supplemental digoxin were determined to account for CVVH- associated digoxin loss. After 14 days of CVVH, the patient's clinical condition improved, and CVVH was transitioned to intermittent hemodialysis. On POD 66, the patient was discharged to an extended-care facility without adverse reactions related to digoxin therapy.. Analysis of serum digoxin concentration and digoxin Cuf values suggested that digoxin was cleared by CVVH, allowed calculation of Sc and CLtm values, and facilitated determination of digoxin requirements in a critically ill patient requiring CVVH.

Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Cardiotonic Agents; Critical Illness; Digoxin; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Echocardiography; Female; Heart Failure; Heart-Assist Devices; Hemofiltration; Humans; Middle Aged

Although the possible interference of digoxin-like immunoreactive substances (DLIS) on the Architect iDigoxin chemiluminiscent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) has been emphasized by the manufacturer, a specific study about this subject has still not been carried out.. Apparent serum digoxin concentrations were determined using the Architect iDigoxin CMIA from Abbott Laboratories in digoxin-free pregnant women (n = 50), and patients with liver disease (n = 50), renal insufficiency (n = 50), kidney (n = 25) or liver (n = 25) transplant, and critical illness (n = 50).. In all of the patients included in this study, apparent serum digoxin concentrations were lower than the correspondent quantification limit (< 0.30 microg/L).. The Architect iDigoxin CMIA assay would be relatively free from endogenous DLIS positive interferences.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Critical Illness; Digoxin; Female; Humans; Kidney Transplantation; Liver Diseases; Liver Transplantation; Male; Middle Aged; Pregnancy; Renal Insufficiency

To determine the incidence of critically ill patients displaying endogenous digitalis-like-immunoreactive substances (DLIS) and to examine the relationship of these hormones to routine laboratory variables, the underlying disease, myocardial function, hemodynamic status, severity of illness, systemic inflammation, and mortality rate.. Sera of 401 consecutive critically ill patients, not treated with cardiac glycosides, were analyzed for DLIS (digitoxin and digoxin, TDx; Abbott Diagnostics, North Chicago, IL) and endogenous ouabain. Normal values of endogenous ouabain were determined in 62 healthy volunteers. We measured pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators (L-selectin, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1beta, interleukin-2, interleukin-6, interleukin-10), C-reactive protein, and serum amyloid A protein as well as patients' Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Goris scores. In a subgroup of patients with a pulmonary artery catheter (n = 95), we determined cardiac output, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance, left ventricular stroke volume, and right and left stroke work.. Two surgical intensive care units of an university hospital.. Sera of 401 consecutive critically ill patients.. Blood sampling.. Of the 401 patients tested, 343 had nonmeasurable DLIS concentrations (DLIS-negative), and 58 (14.5%) had positive digoxin (n = 18) or digitoxin (n = 34) concentrations (DLIS-positive) or were positive in both tests (n = 6). Mean endogenous ouabain concentrations were nine-fold increased in DLIS-positive (3.59 +/- 1.43 nmol/L) and three-fold increased in DLIS-negative (1.34 +/-.81 nmol/L) patients compared with controls (0.38 +/- 0.31 nmol/L). DLIS and ouabain concentrations closely correlated with the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Goris score and were associated with increased concentrations of transaminases, bilirubin, aldosterone, cortisol, serum creatinine, fractional sodium excretion, proinflammatory mediators, C-reactive protein, and serum amyloid A (p

Topics: Aged; APACHE; C-Reactive Protein; Cardenolides; Cardiac Output; Case-Control Studies; Central Venous Pressure; Critical Illness; Digoxin; Female; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Inflammation; Interleukin-1; Interleukin-10; Interleukin-2; Interleukin-6; L-Selectin; Laparotomy; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Wedge Pressure; Saponins; Serum Amyloid A Protein; Stroke Volume; Thoracic Diseases; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Wounds and Injuries

Topics: Blood Proteins; Cardenolides; Critical Illness; Digoxin; Humans; Prognosis; Random Allocation; Saponins