digoxin and Acute-Coronary-Syndrome

The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Guidelines Committee provides periodic reviews of new data to produce focused updates that address clinically important advances in AF management. This 2016 Focused Update deals with: (1) the management of antithrombotic therapy for AF patients in the context of the various clinical presentations of coronary artery disease; (2) real-life data with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants; (3) the use of antidotes for the reversal of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants; (4) digoxin as a rate control agent; (5) perioperative anticoagulation management; and (6) AF surgical therapy including the prevention and treatment of AF after cardiac surgery. The recommendations were developed with the same methodology used for the initial 2010 guidelines and the 2012 and 2014 Focused Updates. Using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) standards, individual studies and literature were reviewed for quality and bias; the literature review process and evidence tables are included in the Supplementary Material, and on the CCS Web site. The section on concomitant AF and coronary artery disease was developed in collaboration with the CCS Antiplatelet Guidelines Committee. Details of the updated recommendations are presented, along with their background and rationale. This document is linked to an updated summary of all CCS AF Guidelines recommendations, from 2010 to the present 2016 Focused Update.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Algorithms; Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial; Cardiotonic Agents; Catheter Ablation; Coronary Artery Disease; Digoxin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Magnesium; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Complications; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Stroke

Digoxin is used to treat atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Previous studies have reported an association between digoxin and higher mortality, but the results have been conflicting. This study assessed the association between digoxin use and all-cause mortality using comprehensive health data of patients treated for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This was a retrospective analysis of 8,388 consecutive ACS patients treated in Tays Heart Hospital between 2007 and 2017, with a follow-up until the end of 2018. The adjusted Cox regression model was used to analyze the association between digoxin treatment and all-cause mortality with and without the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. IPTW was applied to estimate the residual confounding by the treatment selection. Clinical phenotype data were collected from various sources, including a prospectively updated online database maintained by physicians. The median follow-up time was 6.0 years (interquartile range 3.5 to 9.0 years). During the follow-up, 30.8% (n = 2,580) of the patients died. Altogether, 4.0% (n = 333) of the patients were treated with digoxin during hospitalization. In the Cox regression model, digoxin associated with increased mortality (age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.76 [1.51 to 2.05], p <0.001 and in the full risk factor-adjusted HR 1.23 [1.04 to 1.45], p = 0.016). The IPTW Cox analysis average treatment effect HR was 1.71 (1.12 to 2.62, p = 0.013), standardized average treatment effect HR was 1.35 (0.96 to 1.90, p = 0.082), and treatment effect among the treated HR was 1.32 (1.09 to 1.59, p = 0.004). In conclusion, digoxin treatment during ACS associates with increased mortality, despite adjusting for other risk factors and after accounting for factors explaining the residual confounding by selection bias.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Digoxin; Heart Failure; Humans; Retrospective Studies

The use of digitalis has been plagued by controversy since its initial use. We aimed to determine the relationship between digoxin use and outcomes in hospitalized patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) complicated by heart failure (HF) accounting for sex difference and prior heart diseases.. Of the 25 187 patients presenting with acute HF (Killip class ≥2) in the International Survey of Acute Coronary Syndromes Archives (NCT04008173) registry, 4722 (18.7%) received digoxin on hospital admission. The main outcome measure was all-cause 30-day mortality. Estimates were evaluated by inverse probability of treatment weighting models. Women who received digoxin had a higher rate of death than women who did not receive it [33.8% vs. 29.2%; relative risk (RR) ratio: 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12-1.37]. Similar odds for mortality with digoxin were observed in men (28.5% vs. 24.9%; RR ratio: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.10-1.32). Comparable results were obtained in patients with no prior coronary heart disease (RR ratio: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.10-1.45 in women and RR ratio: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.06-1.39 in men) and those in sinus rhythm at admission (RR ratio: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.15-1.54 in women and RR ratio: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.10-1.45 in men).. Digoxin therapy is associated with an increased risk of early death among women and men with ACS complicated by HF. This finding highlights the need for re-examination of digoxin use in the clinical setting of ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clinical Studies as Topic; Digoxin; Female; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Registries

The aim of the study was to determine the influence of the previous use of digoxin on the hospital mortality and complications of patients admitted because of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We analyzed the data of patients included in the ARIAM-Andalucia Registry, which involves 49 hospitals in Andalucia, Spain, from 2007 to 2012. Patients on digoxin treatment prior to their admission because of ACS constituted the digoxin group (DG), and were compared with the group of patients not on digoxin. Logistic regression and propensity score matching were used to analyze the differences. We included 20,331 patients, of whom 244 (1.2%) were on digoxin. DG patients were older (73.1 vs 63.7 years old), more often women, and had more diabetes, hypertension, previous myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease, obstructive pulmonary disease or kidney disease. On univariate analysis, DG patients had significantly higher hospital mortality (13.5 vs 5.3% P < 0.001), and more cardiogenic shock, but less ventricular fibrillation, and no differences in atrioventricular block, stroke or reinfarction. After the multivariate analysis, DG had no significant influence on hospital prognosis [odds ratio (OR) 1.21, 95% confidence interval 0.79-1.86]. The analysis of a propensity-matched cohort of 464 patients (232 DG and 232 NoDG) did not find differences in hospital mortality (13.4 vs 13.4%) nor other complications. In our cohort of ACS patients, the previous treatment with digoxin was not associated with an increase in dysrhythmic complications nor was an independent predictor of mortality during hospitalization.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Digoxin; Female; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Registries; Spain; Time Factors

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Algorithms; Cardiology; Cardiotonic Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus; Digoxin; Female; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Male; Medicare