didanosine and Nausea

didanosine has been researched along with Nausea* in 4 studies

Trials

2 trial(s) available for didanosine and Nausea

ArticleYear
Long-term hydroxyurea in combination with didanosine and stavudine for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Swiss HIV Cohort Study.
    AIDS (London, England), 2000, Sep-29, Volume: 14, Issue:14

    In 1998 we reported on a randomized comparison between stavudine plus didanosine plus placebo versus stavudine plus didanosine plus hydroxyurea (HU), in patients with a CD4 count of 200-500 x 10(6) cells/l. After 3 months, the HU group had a higher proportion of patients with viral load < 200 x 10 cells/l. At the end of the 3 months blinded period, patients in the placebo group had the option to add HU if their viral load remained > 200 x 10(6) cells/l. We report results after 24 months.. Seventy-two patients were randomized to the HU arm, and a further 30 elected to add HU after 12 weeks. Twenty-four months after the start of the trial, only 25% of the 72 patients originally randomized to HU, and 20% of the 30 who added HU after week 12, were still taking it. The reasons for stopping HU were: lack of efficacy (45%), adverse events (37%) and patient or physician preference (18%). Side effects were more frequent in the didanosine/stavudine/HU group than in the didanosine/stavudine group: neuropathy (35 versus 15%, P< 0.02), fatigue (22 versus 7%, P< 0.01), and nausea or vomiting (26 versus 9%, P< 0.01). Of those who had discontinued HU, 73% were taking three drugs including a protease inhibitor. Patients who had started HU were compared with similar patients who had started protease inhibitors in the Swiss cohort. The probability of stopping HU was higher than the probability of stopping nelfinavir or indinavir, and similar to the probability of stopping ritonavir.. HU increased the antiviral effect of stavudine plus didanosine. However, side effects were more frequent, and after 24 months the majority of patients had switched to protease inhibitor regimens.

    Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Diarrhea; Didanosine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enzyme Inhibitors; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Hydroxyurea; Nausea; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Stavudine

2000
A pilot case-control study of zidovudine compared with zidovudine plus didanosine in patients with advanced HIV-1 disease and no previous experience with antiretrovirals.
    Antiviral therapy, 1996, Volume: 1, Issue:2

    Although zidovudine (ZDV) is effective in HIV-1-infected patients, the duration of its efficacy may be short when treatment is started in advanced HIV disease. This pilot prospective case-control study was designed to evaluate the combination of ZDV plus didanosine [ddI] compared with ZDV monotherapy as an initial therapeutic strategy. 'Control' patients (ZDV monotherapy) were matched with 'case' patients (ZDV plus ddI combination therapy) according to the presence or absence of AIDS-defining criteria at entry and CD4 cell count. The case patient group consisted of 35 consecutive HIV-1-infected individuals with < or = 300 CD4 cells/mm3, no previous experience of antiretroviral therapy and who accepted treatment with a combination of ZDV plus ddI. The control patient group consisted of 35 consecutive patients with similar characteristics, but who preferred to start treatment with ZDV alone. Control patients received 250 mg ZDV bid and case patients received ZDV at the same dose plus ddI (200 mg bid). Primary study endpoints were virological (serum HIV-1 RNA) and immunological (CD4 cell count) responses. Viral phenotype (syncytium-inducing (SI) or non-syncytium-inducing (NSI)), development of mutations at codons 215, 41 and 74 and clinical progression (new AIDS-defining event or death) were also assessed. Virological and CD4 cell count responses were significantly greater and more sustained in the group treated with ZDV plus ddI than in the control group, with peak responses of -1.2 +/- 0.7 log10 versus -0.3 +/- 0.4 log10 at 1 month (P = 0.0003) and 61 +/- 52 cells/mm3 versus 19 +/- 25 cells/mm3 at 2 months (P = 0.001), respectively. In both groups the percentage of patients developing a mutation at codon 215 was around 80 per cent at 12 months. A mutation at codon 74 was detected in 30 per cent of case patients at 12 months. Five case patients (14 per cent) versus 12 control patients (34 per cent) showed signs of clinical progression (P = 0.09). In a multivariate model, clinical progression was significantly associated with a baseline

    Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Case-Control Studies; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Codon; Didanosine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Mutation; Nausea; Neutropenia; Pilot Projects; RNA, Viral; Survival Analysis; Zidovudine

1996

Other Studies

2 other study(ies) available for didanosine and Nausea

ArticleYear
Tolerability of enteric-coated didanosine capsules compared with didanosine tablets in adults with HIV infection.
    Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2001, Oct-01, Volume: 28, Issue:2

    A new enteric-coated (EC) didanosine (ddI) formulation (Videx EC; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, U.S.A.) may be better tolerated than the tablet form because it lacks the buffer component thought to be responsible for diarrhea and other gastrointestinal (GI) side effects.. To evaluate the frequency and magnitude of GI side effects (nausea, bloating, GI upset, diarrhea, abdominal cramps, gas [flatus]) before and after switching the formulation of ddI, in study subjects who were experiencing one or more GI symptom(s) of at least moderate severity.. A 6-week open label crossover study of current didanosine tablet users comparing daily symptom scores (7 point scale, 0 = absent to 6 = very severe) during weeks 1 to 2 (on tablets) to weeks 4 and 6 (on EC capsules). Formulation palatability and preference, lifestyle effects, and use of antidiarrheals or other medications for symptom relief were also assessed.. GI symptom scores (7-day means) on tablets were diarrhea 2.11, gas 2.00, bloating 1.23, abdominal cramps 0.74, GI upset 0.69, nausea 0.66. After switching to EC (week 4 and week 6), mean scores decreased for diarrhea (mean scores 0.99 week 4, 0.79 week 6), gas (0.95, 0.79), bloating (0.49, 0.32), abdominal cramps (0.21, 0.05), GI upset (0.16, 0.14), and nausea (0.32, 0.22). Severity of all GI symptoms was significantly reduced after 4 weeks on EC capsules ( p <.01 by paired t- test). Negative impact of side effects on routine activities was significantly reduced (41% on tablet vs. 7% on EC; p <.01). All 42 study subjects preferred the EC form.. According to patients' diary scores, switching to ddI in EC form significantly reduces nausea, bloating, GI upset, diarrhea, abdominal cramps, and gas for individuals who experienced GI side effects while taking the buffered tablet form. The striking tolerability advantages appear to support routine switching to EC for such patients and may suggest that widespread preferential selection of the EC form is appropriate to enhance didanosine tolerability and promote treatment adherence.

    Topics: Adult; Amylases; Anti-HIV Agents; Boston; Capsules; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cross-Over Studies; Diarrhea; Didanosine; Drug Tolerance; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Nausea; Patient Selection; Tablets

2001
Preliminary experience of adverse drug reactions, tolerability, and efficacy of a once-daily regimen of antiretroviral combination therapy.
    Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2000, Jul-01, Volume: 24, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Didanosine; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; Humans; Hypercholesterolemia; Hypertriglyceridemia; Indinavir; Middle Aged; Nausea; Oxazines; Ritonavir

2000