dibekacin and Critical-Illness

To define the pharmacokinetics of arbekacin (ABK), an aminoglycoside, in patients with acutely lowered renal function.. We measured the serum concentrations of ABK, using fluorescence polarization immunoassay, in 10 critically ill patients (patient group) and six healthy volunteers (control group). Data were analysed with a two-compartment model and parameters were estimated by the Bayesian method. The Mann-Whitney U-test or chi-squared test was used as appropriate (P < 0.05).. Creatinine clearance (CCR), measured or estimated using Cockcroft and Gault's formula of the patient group (CCR: 58 +/- 13 mL/min), was significantly lower than that of the control group (CCR: 99 +/- 8 mL/min). However, despite the low CCR, even the maintenance ABK dosage for normal CCR did not elevate the highest serum level (C(max)) to the effective range in the patient group. Although the ABK clearance (CL) did not differ between the groups, the patients' distribution volume (V(d)) increased significantly compared with the control. The transfer rate constant from central to peripheral compartment (k(12)) in the patient group was much higher than that in the control.. In critically ill patients with lowered CCR, the ABK dose for normal CCR subjects does not elevate its serum concentration to effective levels because of augmented V(d) caused by increased k(12). The present results hypothesize that adjustment of antibiotic dosing according to CCR further lowers C(max) in critically ill patients with reduced CCR.

Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bayes Theorem; Creatinine; Critical Illness; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Dibekacin; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay; Humans; Male; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Middle Aged; Staphylococcal Infections; Tissue Distribution

This study examined the pharmacokinetics of arbekacin during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) and assessed the pharmacodynamics to consider arbekacin dosage adaptation in CVVHDF. Arbekacin was administered by 0.5-h infusion once daily, using a polymethyl methacrylate membrane hemofilter, to three critically ill patients undergoing CVVHDF; the flow rates were 0.8 l/h for the filtrate and 0.6 l/h for the dialysate. The drug concentrations in plasma and in the filtrate-dialysate were determined using a fluorescence polarization immunoassay and analyzed pharmacokinetically. The average sieving coefficient of arbekacin was 0.739 and the average drug clearance by CVVHDF was 1.03 l/h. A pharmacokinetic model with three compartments (1, central; 2, peripheral; 3, filtrate-dialysate side hemofilter) accurately reflected the concentration-time data for both plasma and filtrate-dialysate. The pharmacokinetic model assessed the pharmacodynamic profile of arbekacin once-daily regimens (0.5-h infusions) at filtrate-dialysate flow rates of 1.4 and 2.8 l/h, and demonstrated that only the 150-mg and 200-mg regimens achieved an effective target range for C(max) (9-20 microg/ml), suggesting that empirical dosages lower than the usual 150-200 mg should be avoided in patients undergoing CVVHDF. The minimum regimens needed to achieve an effective pharmacodynamic target for the free C(max)/MIC ratio (>8) were 75 mg for an MIC of 0.5 microg/ml, 200 mg for an MIC of 2 microg/ml, and 400 mg for an MIC of 4 microg/ml. These results will help us to better understand the pharmacokinetics of arbekacin during CVVHDF, while also helping in the selection of the appropriate arbekacin regimens, based on a pharmacodynamic assessment, for patients receiving this renal replacement therapy.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Infective Agents; Computer Simulation; Critical Illness; Dibekacin; Drug Administration Schedule; Hemofiltration; Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged