diazepam has been researched along with Osteoarthritis in 4 studies
Diazepam: A benzodiazepine with anticonvulsant, anxiolytic, sedative, muscle relaxant, and amnesic properties and a long duration of action. Its actions are mediated by enhancement of GAMMA-AMINOBUTYRIC ACID activity.
diazepam : A 1,4-benzodiazepinone that is 1,3-dihydro-2H-1,4-benzodiazepin-2-one substituted by a chloro group at position 7, a methyl group at position 1 and a phenyl group at position 5.
Osteoarthritis: A progressive, degenerative joint disease, the most common form of arthritis, especially in older persons. The disease is thought to result not from the aging process but from biochemical changes and biomechanical stresses affecting articular cartilage. In the foreign literature it is often called osteoarthrosis deformans.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
" Thirty-two patients suffering from osteoarthritis were subjected to electroacupuncture, with or without pretreatment with naloxone or diazepam." | 9.07 | Interaction of diazepam and naloxone on acupuncture induced pain relief. ( Eriksson, SV; Lundeberg, S; Lundeberg, T, 1991) |
"Pain was rated on visual analogue scales before, during, and after treatment." | 6.67 | A comparative study of diazepam and acupuncture in patients with osteoarthritis pain: a placebo controlled study. ( Eriksson, SV; Lundeberg, T; Thomas, M, 1991) |
" Thirty-two patients suffering from osteoarthritis were subjected to electroacupuncture, with or without pretreatment with naloxone or diazepam." | 5.07 | Interaction of diazepam and naloxone on acupuncture induced pain relief. ( Eriksson, SV; Lundeberg, S; Lundeberg, T, 1991) |
"Pain was rated on visual analogue scales before, during, and after treatment." | 2.67 | A comparative study of diazepam and acupuncture in patients with osteoarthritis pain: a placebo controlled study. ( Eriksson, SV; Lundeberg, T; Thomas, M, 1991) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 2 (50.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 2 (50.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 0 (0.00) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 0 (0.00) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 0 (0.00) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
TARPLEY, EL | 1 |
Eriksson, SV | 2 |
Lundeberg, T | 2 |
Lundeberg, S | 1 |
Thomas, M | 1 |
Scott, WA | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Evaluating Specific and Non-Specific Mechanisms in Two Distinct Complementary/Integrative Interventions for Chronic Pain[NCT04744883] | Early Phase 1 | 240 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2020-08-10 | Recruiting | ||
Reduced Opioid Analgesic Requirements Via Improved Endogenous Opioid Function[NCT02469077] | 117 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-08-31 | Completed | |||
Acupuncture for Vasectomy Pre-procedural Anxiety and Pain Control in the Primary Care Setting: A Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial[NCT03938415] | 85 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2019-06-01 | Recruiting | |||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
Mean change in 5-day electronic diary ratings of low back pain intensity from pre intervention baseline to post intervention. 9 point pain scale assessing pain intensity with 0 represents no pain and 8 represents worst possible pain. Positive values indicate reduced pain post intervention. (NCT02469077)
Timeframe: At pre-intervention baseline and again post-intervention (an expected average of 6 weeks later)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline (pre intervention) | Change after 6 week intervention period | |
6 Week Aerobic Exercise Intervention | 2.75 | 0.72 |
Normal Exercise (Control) | 2.82 | 0.18 |
Mean change in McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 total chronic back pain ratings on 3 testing days at baseline (pre intervention) and post intervention. The score ranges from 0-10 where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents most intense pain. Positive values indicate decreased back pain post intervention. (NCT02469077)
Timeframe: At pre-intervention baseline laboratory assessment and again post-intervention (an expected average of 6 weeks later)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline (pre intervention) | Change after 6 week intervention period | |
6 Week Aerobic Exercise Intervention | 2.66 | 1.60 |
Normal Exercise (Control) | 3.01 | 1.36 |
Mean change in morphine condition Drug Effects, Liking, and Take Again (DELTA) -Drug Effect subscale ratings on 3 testing days at baseline (pre intervention) and post intervention. The score ranges from 1-5 where 1 represents no effect and 5 represents very strong effect. Positive values indicate decreased overall drug effects post intervention. (NCT02469077)
Timeframe: At pre-intervention baseline and again post-intervention (an expected average of 6 weeks later)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline (pre intervention) | Change after 6 week intervention period | |
6 Week Aerobic Exercise Intervention | 2.72 | 0.10 |
Normal Exercise (Control) | 2.52 | -0.12 |
Mean change in morphine condition Drug Effects, Liking, and Take Again (DELTA) -Drug Liking subscale ratings on 3 testing days at baseline (pre intervention) and post intervention. The score ranges from 0-100 where 0 represents dislike a lot and 100 represents like a lot. Positive values indicate decreased drug liking post intervention. (NCT02469077)
Timeframe: At pre-intervention baseline and again post-intervention (an expected average of 6 weeks later)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline (pre intervention) | Change after 6 week intervention period | |
6 Week Aerobic Exercise Intervention | 52.03 | 4.13 |
Normal Exercise (Control) | 52.89 | 1.04 |
Mean change in morphine condition Drug Effects, Liking, and Take Again (DELTA) -Take Again subscale ratings on 3 testing days at baseline (pre intervention) and post intervention. The score ranges from 0-100 where 0 represents definitely would not take again and 100 represents definitely would take again. Positive values indicate decreased desire to take the drug again post intervention. (NCT02469077)
Timeframe: At pre-intervention baseline and again post-intervention (an expected average of 6 weeks later)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline (pre intervention) | Change after 6 week intervention period | |
6 Week Aerobic Exercise Intervention | 54.49 | 4.40 |
Normal Exercise (Control) | 55.04 | 1.70 |
Mean change in morphine condition VAS Opioid Effects - Unpleasantness subscale ratings on 3 testing days at baseline (pre intervention) and post intervention. The score ranges from 0-300 where 0 represents no unpleasantness and 300 represents most unpleasantness possible. Positive values indicate decreased unpleasantness post intervention. (NCT02469077)
Timeframe: At pre-intervention baseline and again post-intervention (an expected average of 6 weeks later)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline (pre intervention) | Change after 6 week intervention period | |
6 Week Aerobic Exercise Intervention | 33.58 | -3.21 |
Normal Exercise (Control) | 16.52 | 1.86 |
Mean change in morphine condition VAS Opioid Effects-Euphoria subscale ratings on 3 testing days at baseline (pre intervention) and post intervention. The score ranges from 0-300 where 0 means no euphoria and 300 means most euphoria possible. Positive values indicate decreased euphoria post intervention. (NCT02469077)
Timeframe: At pre-intervention baseline and again post-intervention (an expected average of 6 weeks later)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline (pre intervention) | Change after 6 week intervention period | |
6 Week Aerobic Exercise Intervention | 100.60 | 3.19 |
Normal Exercise (Control) | 108.24 | 0.75 |
Mean change in morphine condition VAS Opioid Effects-Sedation subscale ratings on 3 testing days at baseline (pre intervention) and post intervention. The score ranges from 0-300 where 0 means no sedation and 300 means most sedation possible. Positive values indicate decreased sedation post intervention. (NCT02469077)
Timeframe: At pre-intervention baseline and again post-intervention (an expected average of 6 weeks later)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline (pre intervention) | Change after 6 week intervention period | |
6 Week Aerobic Exercise Intervention | 66.58 | 12.89 |
Normal Exercise (Control) | 30.63 | -9.95 |
Mean change in placebo condition ratings of acute thermal pain intensity using the McGill Pain Questionnaire-Short Form on 3 testing days at baseline (per intervention) and post intervention. The score ranges from 0-33 where 0 represents no pain and 33 represents most intense pain. Positive change values indicate decreased pain responsiveness post intervention. (NCT02469077)
Timeframe: At pre-intervention baseline laboratory assessment and again post-intervention (an expected average of 6 weeks later)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline (pre intervention) | Change after 6 week intervention period | |
6 Week Aerobic Exercise Intervention | 10.23 | 0.45 |
Normal Exercise (Control) | 7.83 | -2.14 |
Mean change in Positive and Negative Affect Scale-Negative Affect subscale ratings on 3 testing days at baseline (pre intervention) and post intervention. . Scale ratings range from 10 to 50 where 10 represents lowest negative affect possible and 50 represents highest negative affect possible. Positive values indicate decreased negative affect post intervention. (NCT02469077)
Timeframe: At pre intervention baseline and again post-intervention (an expected average of 6 weeks later)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline (pre intervention) | Change after 6 week intervention period | |
6 Week Aerobic Exercise Intervention | 16.38 | 0.45 |
Normal Exercise (Control) | 15.43 | -2.14 |
"At a laboratory testing day pre and post intervention each participant received morphine sulphate (0.3mg/kg in 20ml saline vehicle initially, followed by 3 incremental doses of 0.02 mg/kg each with testing for thermal evoked pain response. Weight adjusted dosing was used by multiplying the weight of each patient in kg by 0.3mg (dose 1 only) or by .02mg (doses 2-4), with all doses infused in 20mL saline vehicle.~Mean of the change in morphine dosage required to achieve 25 % reduction in thermal evoked pain responses on testing day at baseline (pre-intervention) and post intervention. Positive values for the change in the mean between pre and post intervention indicated decreased morphine requirements post intervention." (NCT02469077)
Timeframe: At pre-intervention baseline laboratory assessment and again post-intervention (an expected average of 6 weeks later)
Intervention | mg (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline (pre intervention) | Change after 6 week intervention period | |
6 Week Aerobic Exercise Intervention | 4.17 | -1.62 |
Normal Exercise (Control) | 6.34 | 0.92 |
"Between-participant (aerobic exercise vs. control group) comparison of mean changes from pre- to post-intervention in opioid blockade effects for McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 Total ratings of back pain based on 3 laboratory testing days at baseline (pre intervention) and post intervention. The score ranges from 0-10 where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents most intense pain. Positive values indicate increased endogenous opioid analgesia post intervention.~This measure will test the effects of the exercise (versus control) intervention on clinical outcomes as indexed by changes in opioid blockade effects (the difference in laboratory evoked pain response evoked between placebo and naloxone drug conditions).~This is a mixed within-between subject design. Per the study protocol, the intent of outcome measures 4 and 6 was to capture opioid blockade effects (within-participant placebo-naloxone condition difference scores) at both the pre- and post-intervention lab assessments, an" (NCT02469077)
Timeframe: At pre-intervention baseline laboratory assessment and again post-intervention (an expected average of 6 weeks later)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline (pre intervention) | Change after 6 week intervention period | |
6 Week Aerobic Exercise Intervention | 0.11 | -0.12 |
Normal Exercise (Control) | 0.18 | -0.24 |
"Between-participant (aerobic exercise vs. control group) comparison of mean changes from pre- to post-intervention in opioid blockade effects for ratings of acute thermal pain intensity on the McGill Pain Questionnaire-Short Form based on 3 laboratory testing days at baseline (pre-intervention) and post intervention. The score ranges from 0-33 where 0 represents no pain and 33 represents more intense pain. Positive values indicate increased endogenous opioid analgesia post intervention.~This measure will test for endogenous opioid mechanisms of the exercise (versus control) intervention as indexed by changes in opioid blockade effects (the difference in laboratory evoked pain response evoked between placebo and naloxone drug conditions).~This is a mixed within-between subject design. Per the study protocol, the intent of outcome measures 4 and 6 was to capture opioid blockade effects (within-participant placebo-naloxone condition difference scores) at both the pre- and post-in" (NCT02469077)
Timeframe: At pre-intervention baseline laboratory assessment and again post-intervention (an expected average of 6 weeks later)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline (pre intervention) | Change after 6 week intervention period | |
6 Week Aerobic Exercise Intervention | -0.33 | 1.97 |
Normal Exercise (Control) | 0.92 | -0.61 |
2 trials available for diazepam and Osteoarthritis
Article | Year |
---|---|
Interaction of diazepam and naloxone on acupuncture induced pain relief.
Topics: Acupuncture Analgesia; Aged; Animals; Chronic Disease; Combined Modality Therapy; Diazepam; Electroa | 1991 |
Interaction of diazepam and naloxone on acupuncture induced pain relief.
Topics: Acupuncture Analgesia; Aged; Animals; Chronic Disease; Combined Modality Therapy; Diazepam; Electroa | 1991 |
Interaction of diazepam and naloxone on acupuncture induced pain relief.
Topics: Acupuncture Analgesia; Aged; Animals; Chronic Disease; Combined Modality Therapy; Diazepam; Electroa | 1991 |
Interaction of diazepam and naloxone on acupuncture induced pain relief.
Topics: Acupuncture Analgesia; Aged; Animals; Chronic Disease; Combined Modality Therapy; Diazepam; Electroa | 1991 |
A comparative study of diazepam and acupuncture in patients with osteoarthritis pain: a placebo controlled study.
Topics: Acupuncture Analgesia; Adult; Cervical Vertebrae; Chronic Disease; Diazepam; Humans; Middle Aged; Os | 1991 |
2 other studies available for diazepam and Osteoarthritis
Article | Year |
---|---|
EVALUATION OF DIAZEPAM (VALIUM) IN THE SYMPTOMATIC TREATMENT OF RHEUMATIC DISORDERS. A CONTROLLED COMPARATIVE STUDY.
Topics: Anxiety; Arthritis; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biomedical Research; Carisoprodol; Chlormezanone; Diazepa | 1965 |
Rheumatology.
Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Analgesics; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Chronic Disease; Diazepam; Female; Gout; Hum | 1972 |