dezocine and Neoplasms

Opioids are the primary choice for managing chronic cancer pain. However, many nonopioid therapies are currently prescribed for chronic cancer pain with little published evidence comparing their efficacy.. Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any systemic pharmaceutical intervention and/or combination thereof in treating chronic cancer pain. The primary outcome was global efficacy reported as an odds ratio (OR). The secondary outcome was change in pain intensity reported as a standardized mean difference (SMD).. We included 81 RCTs consisting of 10,003 patients investigating 11 medication classes. Most RCTs (80%) displayed low risk of bias. The top-ranking classes for global efficacy were nonopioid analgesics (network OR, 0.30; 95% credibility interval [CrI], 0.13 to 0.67), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (network OR, 0.44; 95% CrI, 0.22 to 0.90), and opioids (network OR, 0.49; 95% CrI, 0.27 to 0.86), whereas the top-ranked interventions were lidocaine (network OR, 0.04; 95% CrI, 0.01 to 0.18; surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis [SUCRA] score, 98.1), codeine plus aspirin (network OR, 0.22; 95% CrI, 0.08 to 0.63; SUCRA score, 81.1), and pregabalin (network OR, 0.29; 95% CrI, 0.08 to 0.92; SUCRA score, 73.8). In terms of reducing pain intensity, we found that no class was superior to placebo, whereas the following top-ranked interventions were superior to placebo: ziconotide (network SMD, -24.98; 95% CrI, -32.62 to -17.35; SUCRA score, 99.8), dezocine (network SMD, -13.56; 95% CrI, -23.37 to -3.69; SUCRA score, 93.5), and diclofenac (network SMD, -11.22; 95% CrI, -15.91 to -5.80; SUCRA score, 92.9).. There are significant differences in efficacy among current regimens for chronic cancer pain. Our evidence suggests that certain nonopioid analgesics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can serve as effectively as opioids in managing chronic cancer pain.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Aspirin; Bayes Theorem; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Cancer Pain; Chronic Pain; Codeine; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Diclofenac; Female; Humans; Lidocaine; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Network Meta-Analysis; Odds Ratio; omega-Conotoxins; Pregabalin; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tetrahydronaphthalenes; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The association between the efficacy and safety of dezocine injection and morphine injection for persistence of pain in patients with cancer had yielded controversial results. Therefore, we conduct a meta-analysis of existing observational published studies to assess the relationship between them among Chinese. We conducted a comprehensive research from the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, and Wan Fang Med Online for the related studies up to October 2016. Summary odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated with the random effects model. Nine published studies comprising 333 dezocine injection patients and 321 morphine injection patients were included in this meta-analysis. Our results suggested that there was no statistical significance between dezocine injection and morphine injection at the case number of effective pain relief (EPR) [OR = 0.97, 95% CI (0.77-1.22),

Topics: Asian People; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; China; Female; Humans; Male; Morphine; Neoplasms; Pain; Tetrahydronaphthalenes

Sixty hospitalized subjects with chronic moderate to severe pain as a result of advanced cancer were enrolled in a randomized, parallel, double-blind trial comparing single doses and multiple doses of intramuscular dezocine (10 mg) with butorphanol (2 mg) and placebo. During the initial 6-hour efficacy evaluation, analgesia was measured using verbal and visual scriptors and vital signs, and acute toxicity information was recorded. Subjects with initial pain relief entered the 7-day multidose portion of the trial, and efficacy and toxicity data were recorded daily. After the initial dose the peak analgesia of the active agents was similar, but the duration of analgesia was longer with dezocine. After multiple doses, dezocine was superior to butorphanol in terms of length of treatment. Dezocine had less toxicity than had butorphanol after both single and repeated doses, further suggesting that dezocine may be beneficial in managing chronic cancer pain. The described study design is unique in that it compares the analgesic efficacy and toxicity of several analgesics with placebo after both single and multiple doses in the same subject. This method may prove to be an alternative pain model to evaluate chronic cancer pain.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Butorphanol; Chronic Disease; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cycloparaffins; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Male; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Neoplasms; Pain; Random Allocation; Tetrahydronaphthalenes

A double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial was carried out in 20 hospitalized patients with continuous pain due to cancer to assess the analgesic effectiveness and tolerance of a single intramuscular injection of 10 mg dezocine. Subjective assessments of pain, made at hourly intervals over 4 hours, showed that dezocine produces a statistically significant greater and sustained relief of pain than did placebo. Only minor side-effects were reported.

Topics: Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Bridged-Ring Compounds; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cycloparaffins; Humans; Neoplasms; Pain; Placebos; Tetrahydronaphthalenes

Cancer is the second leading cause of death following ischemic heart disease in the world and the primary clinical, social and economic burden. Surgical resection is the main measure for the treatment of the vast majority of solid tumors. However, the recurrence and metastasis of tumors occur at different periods after surgery in many cases undergoing radical tumor surgery, which is the main cause of death of tumor patients. Moreover, tumor patients are prone to suffer from mental depression, which may increase the morbidity and mortality of tumors. Tumors have a series of clinical biological signs with the following five main features: postoperative pain and cancerous pain; suppression of antitumor immunity; angiogenesis in tumors; proliferation, growth and metastasis of tumors; and mental depression. Surgery is the first treatment in the majority of cancer patients with solid tumors. Opioids are required for anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. For cancerous pain control, patients undergo surgery, and their quality of life of is improved. However, traditional opioids, such as morphine, may inhibit antitumor immunity, induce vascular growth of tumors and promote the proliferation, invasion and migration of cancer cells, and traditional opioids can induce a risk of somatic dependence. However, studies have found that not all opioids share the effects of immunosuppression, tumor proliferation promotion and angiogenesis induction. Dezocine, a novel opioid with specific pharmacological mechanisms, has been demonstrated to regulate the five clinical and biological features of tumors. We reviewed the preclinical and clinical studies of dezocine on postoperative pain and cancer pain in tumor patients as well as the immune system, tumor angiogenesis, tumor proliferation, tumor growth, tumor metastasis and mental depression. We proposed that dezocine may be the best choice of opioids for anesthesia and analgesia in cancer patients.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Cancer Pain; Humans; Neoplasms; Pain, Postoperative; Quality of Life; Tetrahydronaphthalenes