Page last updated: 2024-11-07

dextroamphetamine and Sensitivity and Specificity

dextroamphetamine has been researched along with Sensitivity and Specificity in 20 studies

Dextroamphetamine: The d-form of AMPHETAMINE. It is a central nervous system stimulant and a sympathomimetic. It has also been used in the treatment of narcolepsy and of attention deficit disorders and hyperactivity in children. Dextroamphetamine has multiple mechanisms of action including blocking uptake of adrenergics and dopamine, stimulating release of monamines, and inhibiting monoamine oxidase. It is also a drug of abuse and a psychotomimetic.
(S)-amphetamine : A 1-phenylpropan-2-amine that has S configuration.

Sensitivity and Specificity: Binary classification measures to assess test results. Sensitivity or recall rate is the proportion of true positives. Specificity is the probability of correctly determining the absence of a condition. (From Last, Dictionary of Epidemiology, 2d ed)

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" The method was successfully applied to pharmacokinetic study of the QAAMC in beagle dogs."1.34Development and validation of a liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry assay for the simultaneous determination of D-amphetamine and diphenhydramine in beagle dog plasma and its application to a pharmacokinetic study. ( Chen, Y; Fan, G; Lin, M; Wang, C; Wu, Y; Zhao, W, 2007)
"Phenmetrazine is a central nervous system stimulant currently used as an anorectic agent."1.30A convenient derivatization method for gas chromatography/mass spectrometric determination of phenmetrazine in urine using 2,2,2-trichloroethyl chloroformate. ( Dasgupta, A; Handler, MS; Nine, JS, 1998)

Research

Studies (20)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's7 (35.00)18.2507
2000's7 (35.00)29.6817
2010's6 (30.00)24.3611
2020's0 (0.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Li, J1
Zhang, L2
Cheng, X1
Shen, B1
Qing, C1
Fan, G2
Martin, PT1
Corcoran, M1
Zhang, P1
Katic, A1
Clarke, AR1
Barry, RJ1
Baker, IE1
McCarthy, R1
Selikowitz, M1
Isiten, HN1
Cebi, M1
Sutcubasi Kaya, B1
Metin, B1
Tarhan, N1
Sevak, RJ1
Stoops, WW1
Hays, LR1
Rush, CR1
Fujiki, N1
Cheng, T1
Yoshino, F1
Nishino, S1
Cesari, N1
Fontana, S1
Montanari, D1
Braggio, S1
Wongwan, S1
Sungthong, B1
Scriba, GK1
Luzzi, VI1
Saunders, AN1
Koenig, JW1
Turk, J1
Lo, SF1
Garg, UC1
Dietzen, DJ1
Silber, BY1
Papafotiou, K1
Croft, RJ1
Stough, CK1
Wang, C1
Lin, M1
Chen, Y1
Zhao, W1
Wu, Y1
Bickel, WK1
Oliveto, AH1
Kamien, JB1
Higgins, ST1
Hughes, JR1
Slattum, PW1
Venitz, J1
Barr, WH1
Lienau, AK1
Kuschinsky, K1
Smith, JK1
Neill, JC1
Costall, B1
Chen, YC1
Galpern, WR1
Brownell, AL1
Matthews, RT1
Bogdanov, M1
Isacson, O1
Keltner, JR1
Beal, MF1
Rosen, BR1
Jenkins, BG1
Dasgupta, A1
Handler, MS1
Nine, JS1
Markey, P1
Mills, KC1
Spruill, SE1
Kanne, RW1
Parkman, KM1
Zhang, Y1
Vickers, JN1
Rodrigues, ST1
Brown, LN1

Clinical Trials (1)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Phase I, Randomized, Double Blind, Three-Period Crossover, Estimation Study Using Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate, Immediate Release Mixed Amphetamine Salts and Placebo to Evaluate the Utility of a Standardized Computer Battery of Tests in Adults With Atten[NCT01010750]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-05Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

CAARS-S:S Subscale T-Score: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Index

Consists of 12 items with each item rated on a scale of 0-3 (not at all, just a little, pretty much, very much). The T-score is then calculated as: T = 50 + 10 * (raw score - mean)/Standard Deviation. The average score is 50. Scores below 50 are better than scores above 50. (NCT01010750)
Timeframe: 2 and 14 hours post-dose on Day 7

,,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
2 hours post-dose14 hours post-dose
LDX 50 mg64.8266.56
MAS-IR 20 mg63.9063.09
Placebo64.5964.85

CAARS-S:S Subscale T-Score: Hyperactivity/Restlessness

Consists of 5 items with each item rated on a scale of 0-3 (not at all, just a little, pretty much, very much). The T-score is then calculated as: T = 50 + 10 * (raw score - mean)/Standard Deviation. The average score is 50. Scores below 50 are better than scores above 50. (NCT01010750)
Timeframe: 2 and 14 hours post-dose on Day 7

,,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
2 hours post-dose14 hours post-dose
LDX 50 mg64.2165.08
MAS-IR 20 mg63.6263.41
Placebo63.2865.74

CAARS-S:S Subscale T-Score: Impulsivity/Emotional Liability

Consists of 5 items with each item rated on a scale of 0-3 (not at all, just a little, pretty much, very much). The T-score is then calculated as: T = 50 + 10 * (raw score - mean)/Standard Deviation. The average score is 50. Scores below 50 are better than scores above 50. (NCT01010750)
Timeframe: 2 and 14 hours post-dose on Day 7

,,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
2 hours post-dose14 hours post-dose
LDX 50 mg55.4657.82
MAS-IR 20 mg54.5851.53
Placebo54.6655.78

CAARS-S:S Subscale T-Score: Problems With Self-Concept

Consists of 5 items with each item rated on a scale of 0-3 (not at all, just a little, pretty much, very much). The T-score is then calculated as: T = 50 + 10 * (raw score - mean)/Standard Deviation. The average score is 50. Scores below 50 are better than scores above 50. (NCT01010750)
Timeframe: 2 and 14 hours post-dose on Day 7

,,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
2 hours post-dose14 hours post-dose
LDX 50 mg58.7159.68
MAS-IR 20 mg59.7859.54
Placebo58.4059.68

Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scales-Self Report: Short Version (CAARS-S:S) Subscale Total Score (T-Score): Inattention/Memory Problems

Consists of 5 items with each item rated on a scale of 0-3 (not at all, just a little, pretty much, very much). The T-score is then calculated as: T = 50 + 10 * (raw score - mean)/Standard Deviation. The average score is 50. Scores below 50 are better than scores above 50. (NCT01010750)
Timeframe: 2 and 14 hours post-dose on Day 7

,,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
2 hours post-dose14 hours post-dose
LDX 50 mg66.1665.78
MAS-IR 20 mg63.3964.45
Placebo64.9266.33

Power of Attention Score

The Power of Attention score reflects the ability to focus attention, and is calculated as the sum of the reaction time, measured in milliseconds, from 3 attention tests (Simple Reaction Time, Choice Reaction Time, and Digit Vigilance Speed). Faster performance (lower times) reflects more intense concentration. A decrease in the Power of Attention score indicates improvement. (NCT01010750)
Timeframe: pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 12, 14 and 16 hours post-dose on Day 7

,,
Interventionmilliseconds (Mean)
half an hour prior to dosing1 hour post-dose2 hours post-dose3 hours post-dose4 hours post-dose5 hours post-dose8 hours post-dose12 hours post-dose14 hours post-dose16 hours post-dose
LDX 50 mg1260.71244.61315.51219.11225.91179.61212.01232.41199.31202.6
MAS-IR 20 mg1324.11307.41255.01229.61236.51251.41259.31239.31270.11255.9
Placebo1272.81253.11296.21301.01275.41330.31304.51262.11270.51270.3

Trials

6 trials available for dextroamphetamine and Sensitivity and Specificity

ArticleYear
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of the effects of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and mixed amphetamine salts on cognition throughout the day in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    Clinical drug investigation, 2014, Volume: 34, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Amphetamines; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulant

2014
An Investigation of Stimulant Effects on the EEG of Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
    Clinical EEG and neuroscience, 2017, Volume: 48, Issue:4

    Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; Dext

2017
An evaluation of the sensitivity of the standardised field sobriety tests to detect the presence of amphetamine.
    Psychopharmacology, 2005, Volume: 182, Issue:1

    Topics: Accidents, Traffic; Adult; Alcoholic Intoxication; Amphetamine-Related Disorders; Dextroamphetamine;

2005
A novel-response procedure enhances the selectivity and sensitivity of a triazolam discrimination in humans.
    The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 1993, Volume: 264, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Dextroamphetamine; Discrimination, Psychological; Dose-Response Relationship, Dru

1993
Comparison of methods for the assessment of central nervous system stimulant response after dextroamphetamine administration to healthy male volunteers.
    Journal of clinical pharmacology, 1996, Volume: 36, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Affect; Blood Pressure; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cross-Over Studies; Dextroamphetam

1996
The influence of stimulants, sedatives, and fatigue on tunnel vision: risk factors for driving and piloting.
    Human factors, 2001,Summer, Volume: 43, Issue:2

    Topics: Alcohol Drinking; Alprazolam; Analysis of Variance; Automobile Driving; Aviation; Central Nervous Sy

2001

Other Studies

14 other studies available for dextroamphetamine and Sensitivity and Specificity

ArticleYear
Determination of d-amphetamine and diphenhydramine in beagle dog plasma by a 96-well formatted liquid-liquid extraction and capillary zone electrophoresis with field-amplified sample stacking.
    Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2018, Jul-15, Volume: 156

    Topics: Animals; Calibration; Capsules; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Dextroamphetamine; Diphenhydra

2018
Medication Effects on EEG Biomarkers in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
    Clinical EEG and neuroscience, 2017, Volume: 48, Issue:4

    Topics: Adolescent; Antidepressive Agents; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Biomarkers; Brain

2017
Discriminative stimulus and subject-rated effects of methamphetamine, d-amphetamine, methylphenidate, and triazolam in methamphetamine-trained humans.
    The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2009, Volume: 328, Issue:3

    Topics: Anti-Anxiety Agents; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Dextroamphetamine; Diastole; Discrimination,

2009
Specificity of direct transition from wake to REM sleep in orexin/ataxin-3 transgenic narcoleptic mice.
    Experimental neurology, 2009, Volume: 217, Issue:1

    Topics: Analysis of Variance; Animals; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Ataxin-3; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cen

2009
Development and validation of a high-throughput method for the quantitative analysis of D-amphetamine in rat blood using liquid chromatography/MS3 on a hybrid triple quadrupole-linear ion trap mass spectrometer and its application to a pharmacokinetic stu
    Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences, 2010, Jan-01, Volume: 878, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; Chromatography, Liquid; Dextroamphetamine; Drug Stability; Male; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley

2010
CE assay for simultaneous determination of charged and neutral impurities in dexamphetamine sulfate using a dual CD system.
    Electrophoresis, 2010, Volume: 31, Issue:9

    Topics: Acetone; Amphetamine; beta-Cyclodextrins; Calibration; Dextroamphetamine; Drug Contamination; Electr

2010
Analytic performance of immunoassays for drugs of abuse below established cutoff values.
    Clinical chemistry, 2004, Volume: 50, Issue:4

    Topics: Cocaine; Dextroamphetamine; Dronabinol; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry; Humans; Immunoassay; M

2004
Development and validation of a liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry assay for the simultaneous determination of D-amphetamine and diphenhydramine in beagle dog plasma and its application to a pharmacokinetic study.
    Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences, 2007, Jul-01, Volume: 854, Issue:1-2

    Topics: Animals; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Dextroamphetamine; Diphenhydramine; Dogs; Reference S

2007
Sensitization phenomena after repeated administration of cocaine or D-amphetamine in rats: associative and non-associative mechanisms and the role of dopamine in the striatum.
    Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 1997, Volume: 355, Issue:4

    Topics: Animals; Cocaine; Dextroamphetamine; Dopamine; Locomotion; Male; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Sensitivity and

1997
Post-weaning housing conditions influence the behavioural effects of cocaine and d-amphetamine.
    Psychopharmacology, 1997, Volume: 131, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; Behavior, Animal; Cocaine; Dextroamphetamine; Female; Locomotion; Rats; Sensitivity and Spe

1997
Detection of dopaminergic neurotransmitter activity using pharmacologic MRI: correlation with PET, microdialysis, and behavioral data.
    Magnetic resonance in medicine, 1997, Volume: 38, Issue:3

    Topics: Adrenergic Agents; Animals; Behavior, Animal; Brain; Cocaine; Dextroamphetamine; Dopamine; Dopamine

1997
A convenient derivatization method for gas chromatography/mass spectrometric determination of phenmetrazine in urine using 2,2,2-trichloroethyl chloroformate.
    Journal of forensic sciences, 1998, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Appetite Depressants; Cross Reactions; Dextroamphetamine; Forensic Medicine; Gas Chromatography-Mass

1998
Is it truly random?
    Australian family physician, 1999, Volume: 28 Suppl 1

    Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Australia; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Dextroa

1999
Gaze pursuit and arm control of adolescent males diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and normal controls: evidence of a dissociation in processing visual information of short and long duration.
    Journal of sports sciences, 2002, Volume: 20, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Analysis of Variance; Arm; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Case-Control S

2002