delapril and Diabetes-Mellitus--Type-2

In patients with hypertension and diabetes, atherothrombosis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, and there is now compelling evidence demonstrating that lowering elevated blood pressure (BP) is one of the most beneficial aims of therapy in this high-risk population. Indeed, major international guidelines have set a target BP goal of 130/80 mmHg in high-risk patients and recommend combination treatment with two or more drug classes to help achieve this objective. Manidipine plus delapril is a fixed-dose combination of a third-generation dihydropyridine calcium antagonist and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, which is effective in mild-to-moderately hypertensive patients with an inadequate response to monotherapy. It is also effective in the long-term (50 weeks) management of essential hypertension. Comparative studies have demonstrated that manidipine plus delapril is as effective as enalapril plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in patients with hypertension that is unresponsive to monotherapy, and as effective as ramipril plus HCTZ, valsartan plus HCTZ, irbesartan plus HCTZ and olmesartan plus HCTZ in patients with essential hypertension and Type 2 diabetes. In addition, manidipine plus delapril exhibited renoprotective effects in normotensive Type 2 diabetic patients, and improved fibrinolytic function (significantly more than irbesartan plus HCTZ) in hypertensive patients with Type 2 diabetes. Manidipine 10 mg plus delapril 30 mg once daily was generally well tolerated, with no unexpected adverse effects and evidence of a low incidence of ankle edema. Thus, manidipine plus delapril is a fixed-dose combination treatment that significantly reduces elevated BP with once-daily administration. It is well tolerated and has ancillary properties, such as nephroprotective activity and improvement of fibrinolytic balance, which may help reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, particularly in high-risk patients, such as those with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Topics: Blood Pressure Determination; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Dihydropyridines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Indans; Male; Nitrobenzenes; Piperazines; Prognosis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Survival Analysis

To assess whether angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and third-generation dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers ameliorate diabetic complications, we compared glomerular filtration rate (GFR; primary outcome), cardiovascular events, retinopathy, and neuropathy in 380 hypertensive type 2 diabetics with albuminuria <200 mg/min included in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (DEMAND [Delapril and Manidipine for Nephroprotection in Diabetes]) and randomized to 3-year treatment with manidipine/delapril combination (10/30 mg/d; n=126), delapril (30 mg/d; n=127), or placebo (n=127). GFR was centrally measured by iohexol plasma clearance. Median monthly GFR decline (interquartile range [IQR]) was 0.32 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) (IQR: 0.16-0.50 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)) on combined therapy, 0.36 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) (IQR: 0.18-0.53 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)) on delapril, and 0.30 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) (IQR: 0.12-0.50 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)) on placebo (P=0.87 and P=0.53 versus combined therapy or delapril, respectively). Similar findings were observed when baseline GFR values were not considered for slope analyses. Albuminuria was stable in the 3 treatment groups. The hazard ratio (95% CI) for major cardiovascular events between combined therapy and placebo was 0.17 (0.04-0.78; P=0.023). Among 192 subjects without retinopathy at inclusion, the hazard ratio for developing retinopathy between combined therapy and placebo was 0.27 (0.07-0.99; P=0.048). Among 200 subjects with centralized neurological evaluation, the odds ratios for peripheral neuropathy at 3 years between combined therapy or delapril and placebo were 0.45 (0.24-0.87; P=0.017) and 0.52 (0.27-0.99; P=0.048), respectively. Glucose disposal rate decreased from 5.8±2.4 to 5.3±1.9 mg/kg per min on placebo (P=0.03) but did not change on combined or delapril therapy. Treatment was well tolerated. In hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients, combined manidipine and delapril therapy failed to slow GFR decline but safely ameliorated cardiovascular disease, retinopathy, and neuropathy and stabilized insulin sensitivity.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Calcium Channel Blockers; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Dihydropyridines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Indans; Kidney Function Tests; Male; Middle Aged; Nitrobenzenes; Piperazines; Prognosis; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome

Patients with diabetes complicated by hypertension and microalbuminuria have elevated cardiovascular risk, and controlling blood pressure in these patients is an urgent clinical priority. The present study aimed to examine the effects of a fixed-dose combination of antihypertensives on blood pressure and microalbuminuria.. Patients with type 2 diabetes, mild-to-moderate hypertension (diastolic blood pressure 85-105 mmHg, systolic blood pressure <160 mmHg, and 24-hour mean systolic blood pressure >130 mmHg), and microalbuminuria were randomized to 1 year of doubleblind treatment with fixed-dose manidipine/delapril (n=54) or losartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) (n=56).. Blood pressure was significantly reduced at 1 year in both groups (-22.2/-14.6 mmHg and -19.5/-14.3 mmHg, for systolic and diastolic blood pressure respectively, P<0.001 for each), with no significant between-group difference. Reductions in microalbuminuria occurred in both groups, with mean changes at 1 year of -3.9 mg/mmol creatinine (95% CI -5.3, -2.5) for manidipine/delapril (P<0.001 vs. baseline) and -2.7 mg/mmol creatinine (95% CI -4.0, -1.3) for losartan/HCTZ (P<0.001 vs. baseline and P=0.199 between groups). Glycemia over the 1-year study was largely unaffected; the blood glucose concentration was reduced from baseline with manidipine/delapril, although not statistically significant (mean change -0.2 mmol/L, P=0.064). Both treatments were well tolerated, with discontinuation for adverse events for one (1.9%) patient in the manidipine/delapril group and two (3.6%) in the losartan/HCTZ group.. A fixed-dose manidipine/delapril combination represents a useful addition to the treatment options available to control hypertension complicated by diabetes and microalbuminuria.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Albuminuria; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dihydropyridines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Hydrochlorothiazide; Hypertension; Indans; Losartan; Male; Middle Aged; Nitrobenzenes; Piperazines

Hypertension markedly increases the already high risk for cardiovascular complications in patients with diabetes mellitus. Less than one in eight patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes have adequately controlled blood pressure. As a result, antihypertensive combinations are now widely used in management of hypertension associated with diabetes.. This double-blind study investigated efficacy of a new fixed dose combination of a calcium antagonist, manidipine 10 mg, and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, delapril 30 mg, compared with a combination of an angiotensin receptor blocker, losartan 50 mg, and a diuretic, hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg. Patients with hypertension (blood pressure > or = 130/80 mmHg) with controlled type 2 diabetes (HbA1c < or = 7.5%) were randomized to manidipine/delapril (n = 153) or losartan/hydrochlorothiazide (n = 161), administered once daily for 12 weeks. Patients underwent ambulatory blood pressure monitor evaluation at baseline and end of treatment.. Mean decreases in 24-h systolic blood pressure were seen with both manidipine/delapril (-9.3 mmHg) and losartan/hydrochlorothiazide (-10.7 mmHg) combinations. The mean (95% confidence interval) treatment difference was -1.4 (-4.5/1.8) mmHg, demonstrating noninferiority of the manidipine/delapril combination. Reduction in 24-h diastolic blood pressure (-4.6 versus -4.5 mmHg) and daytime (systolic blood pressure -10.5 versus -11.1 mmHg) and night-time (systolic blood pressure -7.1 versus -9.3 mmHg) blood pressure were also not significantly different between treatments. Compliance and adverse events were comparable for both groups.. The study demonstrated that the combination of manidipine and delapril is as effective as losartan and hydrochlorothiazide in treatment of hypertension in type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dihydropyridines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hydrochlorothiazide; Hypertension; Indans; Losartan; Male; Middle Aged; Nitrobenzenes; Piperazines; Treatment Outcome

The purpose of this study was to compare the combination treatments of manidipine/delapril and olmesartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in elderly diabetic hypertensives. After a 4-week placebo period, 158 hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes (age range: 66 to 74 years) were randomized to receive combination treatment of 10 mg manidipine plus 30 mg delapril or 20 mg olmesartan plus 12.5 mg HCTZ for 48 weeks in a prospective, parallel arm trial. After 12 weeks, manidipine or HCTZ was doubled in nonresponders (systolic blood pressure [SBP] > or =130 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure [DBP] > or =80 mmHg). Patients were checked at the end of the placebo period and every 12 weeks thereafter. At each visit, lying, sitting and standing BP as well as fasting glycemia, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), electrolytes, uric acid, total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides (TG) were evaluated. Both combinations reduced sitting SBP (-27.7 and -28.3 mmHg, respectively; both p<0.001) and DBP (-15.1 and -14.8 mmHg, respectively; both p<0.01) with no difference between the two treatments. Standing DBP was more markedly reduced by olmesartan/HCTZ (-19.5 mmHg; p<0.001) than by manidipine/delapril (-14.7 mmHg; p<0.05 vs. olmesartan/HCTZ). No changes in metabolic parameters were observed with manidipine/delapril, whereas an increase in HbA1c (+0.7%; p<0.05), uric acid (+0.4 mg/dL; p<0.05) and TG (+41.3 mg/dL; p<0.05), and a decrease in serum potassium (-0.3 mmol/L; p<0.05) and HDL-C (-3.4 mg/dL; p<0.05) were found in the olmesartan/HCTZ group. In conclusion, both combinations were similarly effective in reducing BP in elderly hypertensive diabetic patients. However, manidipine/delapril offered some advantages in terms of the less-pronounced BP orthostatic changes and absence of metabolic adverse effects.

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Calcium Channel Blockers; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dihydropyridines; Diuretics; Drug Combinations; Endpoint Determination; Female; Humans; Hydrochlorothiazide; Hypertension; Hypotension, Orthostatic; Imidazoles; Indans; Male; Nitrobenzenes; Piperazines; Posture; Prospective Studies; Tetrazoles

The aim of this double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study was to compare the effects of delapril-manidipine combination vs a irbesartan-hydrochlorothiazide combination on plasma tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and plasmogen activator inhibitor type I (PAI-l) activities in hypertensive patients with type II diabetes mellitus. After a 4-week run-in placebo period, 80 patients (37 male and 43 female), aged 41-65 years, were randomly allocated to an 8-week treatment with delapril 30 mg once daily or irbesartan 150 mg once daily. Thereafter, manidipine l0 mg once daily was added to delapril treatment and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg to irbesartan treatment for a further 8 weeks. Blood pressure (BP), plasma t-PA and PAI-l activities were evaluated at the end of the run-in period, after 4-week monotherapy treatments, and at the end of the combination treatment periods. Both combination treatments, delapril-manidipine and irbesartan-hydrochlorothiazide, produced a greater reduction in systolic BP/diastolic BP (SBP/DBP) values (-27.6/21.8 mmHg and -26.4/20.2 mmHg, respectively) than the respective monotherapies (-15.2/11.7 mmHg with delapril and -16.3/11.3 mmHg with irbesartan). Delapril monotherapy significantly decreased plasma PAI-l activity (-10.4 IU/mI; P<0.05). The addition of manidipine produced a significant increase in t-PA activity (+0.27 IU/mI); P<0.05). Irbesartan monotherapy did not significantly affect the fibrinolytic balance, whereas the addition of hydrochlorothiazide worsened it, producing a significant increase in PAI-l activity (+9.5 IU/ml; P<0.05). In hypertensive patients with type II diabetes mellitus, the combination delapril-manidipine may determine a greater improvement of the fibrinolytic function than the respective monotherapy, while the association irbesartan-hydrochlorothiazide may worsen it.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dihydropyridines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fibrinolysis; Humans; Hydrochlorothiazide; Hypertension; Indans; Irbesartan; Male; Middle Aged; Nitrobenzenes; Piperazines; Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1; Tetrazoles; Tissue Plasminogen Activator; Treatment Outcome

Thirty-nine hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were followed under long-term treatment (mean, 20.7 months) with manidipine hydrochloride, a Ca antagonist, or delapril hydrochloride, an ACE inhibitor, at nine institutions. Both the treatments showed similar antihypertensive effects, although slight but significantly larger decreases were observed in systolic and mean blood pressures at months 12 and 24 in the patients treated with manidipine (P < 0.02). The urinary albumin excretion index (AEI) tended to increase throughout the study in both treatment groups, but no significant difference in AEI was observed between the two treatment groups at any time point. Overt albuminuria developed in four patients on manidipine but did not appear in any of the patients on delapril. The risk of progression to overt albuminuria was significantly different between manidipine and delapril groups (P = 0.011). No increase in serum creatinine (Cr) was observed with delapril. The average excretion indexes of tubular markers such as beta2-microglobulin, alpha1-microglobulin, and NAG tended to be higher in the patients on manidipine than in those on delapril. Taken in sum, these findings suggest that the ACE inhibitor delapril is more beneficial than the Ca antagonist manidipine in the treatment of diabetic renal diseases via mechanisms other than the blood pressure regulation, partly through their different effects on tubular function. In conclusion, delapril was significantly more effective than manidipine in inhibiting progression to overt albuminuria in hypertensive type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Dihydropyridines; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Indans; Male; Middle Aged; Nitrobenzenes; Piperazines

Effects of manidipine, a new calcium antagonist, and delapril, an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, on glucose and lipid metabolism were investigated in mild to moderate hypertensive patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). The patients were treated with either manidipine 10 mg/day (n = 12, mean age 63 +/- 2 years) or delapril 30 mg/day (n = 8, 62 +/- 3 years) for 12 weeks. Glucose and insulin (IRI) responses to 75 g oral glucose load, glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (Hb A1c), serum levels of total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglyceride and apolipoproteins, and 24 h urinary excretion of C-peptide were measured before and at the end of treatment. Both manidipine and delapril showed adequate hypotensive effects. Neither manidipine nor delapril affected blood glucose and IRI responses to glucose load. Manidipine showed no effect on lipids whereas delapril increased HDL cholesterol (47 +/- 5 mg/dL to 61 +/- 7, p < 0.05), although total cholesterol and triglyceride were not altered. The ratio of TC-HDL cholesterol/HDL cholesterol was decreased by delapril (3.44 +/- 0.30 to 2.61 +/- 0.45, p < 0.05). There were no significant changes in apolipoproteins. Both manidipine and delapril have adequate antihypertensive actions without unfavorable effects on glucose and lipid metabolism in hypertensive patients with NIDDM. Delapril seems to have a beneficial effect on lipid metabolism.

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dihydropyridines; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Hypertension; Indans; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Nitrobenzenes; Piperazines

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dihydropyridines; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Indans; Male; Nitrobenzenes; Piperazines

The open trial was designed to evaluate the effects of long-term antihypertensive treatment with the calcium-channel blocker, manidipine and the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, delapril on insulin sensitivity in Japanese non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients with essential hypertension. We measured the insulin sensitivity index (SI) and the glucose-effectiveness (SG) by the use of Bergman's minimal model method in 18 hypertensive NIDDM patients before and after administration of manidipine (group A) or delapril (group B) for 3 months. Manidipine treatment for 3 months significantly improved SI in group A from 3.35 +/- 0.61 (x 10(-4) min-1 microU-1 ml-1) to 4.70 +/- 1.34 (P < 0.05). Delapril treatment for 3 months also significantly improved SI in group B from 3.56 +/- 1.04 to 5.00 +/- 0.87 (P < 0.05). Manidipine significantly improved SG in group A from 1.60 +/- 0.64 (x 10(-2) min) to 2.19 +/- 0.38 (P < 0.05). Delapril treatment also significantly improved SG in the group B from 1.41 +/- 0.56 to 1.91 +/- 0.35 (P < 0.05). Manidipine and delapril did not affect urinary C-peptide excretion for 24 h in the hypertensive NIDDM patients. Treatment with manidipine or delapril significantly reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressures in the hypertensive NIDDM patients. There were no differences between plasma glucose, serum total triglycerides, and cholesterol or lipoprotein cholesterol fractions, heart rate and body weight after 3 months on manidipine or delapril. This study confirmed the improving effects on SI and SG by long-term treatment with manidipine or delapril in the hypertensive NIDDM patients.

Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Glucose; Calcium Channel Blockers; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Dihydropyridines; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypertension; Indans; Insulin Resistance; Male; Middle Aged; Nitrobenzenes; Piperazines