defactinib and Mesothelioma

defactinib has been researched along with Mesothelioma* in 5 studies

Trials

1 trial(s) available for defactinib and Mesothelioma

ArticleYear
Maintenance Defactinib Versus Placebo After First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients With Merlin-Stratified Pleural Mesothelioma: COMMAND-A Double-Blind, Randomized, Phase II Study.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2019, 04-01, Volume: 37, Issue:10

    Inhibition of focal adhesion kinase has been shown to selectively kill mesothelioma cells that express low levels of moesin-ezrin-radixin-like protein (merlin). On this basis, we designed a randomized, phase II trial to investigate whether defactinib as maintenance therapy after standard first-line chemotherapy could improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).. This global, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in patients with advanced MPM and disease control after at least four cycles of first-line chemotherapy. Patients were stratified for merlin and then randomly assigned (in a 1:1 fashion) to receive either oral defactinib or placebo until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal occurred. The coprimary end points were PFS and overall survival (OS). Quality of life (QoL) was assessed using the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale for Mesothelioma tool.. Three hundred forty-four patients were randomly assigned to receive either defactinib (n = 173) or placebo (n = 171). The median PFS was 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.9 to 5.6 months) for defactinib versus 4.0 months (95% CI, 2.9 to 4.2 months) for placebo. The median OS was 12.7 months (95% CI, 9.1 to 21 months) for defactinib versus 13.6 months (95% CI, 9.6 to 21.2 months) for placebo (hazard ratio, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.7 to 1.4). Although shorter survival for both defactinib- and placebo-treated patients was observed, in the patients who had merlin-low MPM compared with the patients who had merlin-high MPM, there were no statistical differences in response rate, PFS, OS, or QoL between the treatment groups. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were nausea, diarrhea, fatigue, dyspnea, and decreased appetite.. Neither PFS nor OS was improved by defactinib after first-line chemotherapy in patients with merlin-low MPM. Defactinib cannot be recommended as maintenance therapy for advanced MPM.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzamides; Diarrhea; Double-Blind Method; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Mesothelioma; Mesothelioma, Malignant; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neurofibromin 2; Pleural Neoplasms; Pyrazines; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

2019

Other Studies

4 other study(ies) available for defactinib and Mesothelioma

ArticleYear
Reply to K. Masuda et al.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2019, 09-01, Volume: 37, Issue:25

    Topics: Benzamides; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Mesothelioma; Neurofibromin 2; Pyrazines; Sulfonamides

2019
Questions Regarding the Randomized Phase II Trial of Defactinib as Maintenance Therapy in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2019, 09-01, Volume: 37, Issue:25

    Topics: Benzamides; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Mesothelioma; Neurofibromin 2; Pleural Neoplasms; Pyrazines; Sulfonamides

2019
Focal adhesion kinase a potential therapeutic target for pancreatic cancer and malignant pleural mesothelioma.
    Cancer biology & therapy, 2018, 04-03, Volume: 19, Issue:4

    The non-receptor cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase, Focal Adhesion Kinase (FAK) is known to play a key role in a variety of normal and cancer cellular functions such as survival, proliferation, migration and invasion. It is highly active and overexpressed in various cancers including Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM). Here, initially, we demonstrate that FAK is overexpressed in both PDAC and MPM cell lines. Then we analyze effects of two small molecule inhibitors PF-573228, and PF-431396, which are dual specificity inhibitors of FAK and proline rich tyrosine kinase 2 (PYK2), as well as VS-6063, another small molecule inhibitor that specifically inhibits FAK but not PYK2 for cell growth, motility and invasion of PDAC and MPM cell lines. Treatment with PF-573228, PF-431396 and VS-6063 cells resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of growth and anchorage-independent colony formation in both cancer cell lines. Furthermore, these compounds suppressed the phosphorylation of FAK at its active site, Y397, and functionally induced significant apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in both cell lines. Using the ECIS (Electric cell-substrate impedance sensing) system, we found that treatment of both PF compounds suppressed adherence and migration of PDAC cells on fibronectin. Interestingly, 3D-tumor organoids derived from autochthonous KC (Kras;PdxCre) mice treated with PF-573228 revealed a significant decrease in tumor organoid size and increase in organoid cell death. Taken together, our results show that FAK is an important target for mesothelioma and pancreatic cancer therapy that merit further translational studies.

    Topics: Animals; Benzamides; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Cell Adhesion; Cell Culture Techniques; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Movement; Focal Adhesion Kinase 1; Focal Adhesion Kinase 2; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Mesothelioma; Mesothelioma, Malignant; Mice; Mice, Transgenic; Neoplasms, Experimental; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Phosphorylation; Pleural Neoplasms; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Pyrazines; Quinolones; Sulfonamides; Sulfones

2018
Assessment of signaling pathway inhibitors and identification of predictive biomarkers in malignant pleural mesothelioma.
    Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2018, Volume: 126

    Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive tumor with limited therapeutic options, requiring the development of efficient targeted therapies based on molecular phenotype of the tumor and to identify predictive biomarkers of the response.. The effect of inhibitors was investigated by cell viability assessment on primary MPM cell lines established in our laboratory from patient tumors, well characterized at the molecular level. Effects on apoptosis, cell proliferation and viability on MPM growing in multicellular spheroid were also assessed for verteporfin. Gene and protein expression, and gene knockdown by RNA interference were used to define mechanism of inhibition and specific predictive biomarkers.. Anti-tumor effect of eight major signaling pathways inhibitors involved in mesothelial carcinogenesis was investigated. Three inhibitors were more efficient than cisplatin, the drug used as first-line chemotherapy in patients with MPM: verteporfin, a putative YAP inhibitor, defactinib, a FAK inhibitor and NSC668394, an Ezrin inhibitor. Verteporfin, the most efficient inhibitor, induced cell proliferation arrest and cell death, and is effective on 3D spheroid multicellular model. Verteporfin sensitivity was YAP-independent and related to molecular classification of the tumors. Biomarkers based on gene expression were identified to predict accurately sensitivity to these three inhibitors.. Our study shows that drug screening on well-characterized MPM cells allows for the identification of novel potential therapeutic strategies and defining specific biomarkers predictive of the drug response.

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Benzamides; Biomarkers, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Mesothelioma; Phenols; Pleural Neoplasms; Pyrazines; Quinolones; RNA Interference; Signal Transduction; Sulfonamides; Tumor Cells, Cultured; Verteporfin

2018