da-8159 and Prostatic-Hyperplasia

Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) have showed significant improvements in both lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and erectile dysfunction (ED) in men affected by one or both conditions, without a significant increase in adverse events. However, the results are inconsistent.. Perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of available prospective and cross-sectional studies on the use of PDE5-Is alone or in combination with α1-adrenergic blockers in patients with LUTS/benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).. A systematic search was performed using the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases through September 2011 including the combination of the following terms: LUTS, BPH, PDE5-Is, sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil, udenafil, α-blockers, and α1-adrenergic blocker. The meta-analysis was conducted according to the guidelines for observational studies in epidemiology.. Of 107 retrieved articles, 12 were included in the present meta-analysis: 7 on PDE5-Is versus placebo, with 3214 men, and 5 on the combination of PDE5-Is with α1-adrenergic blockers versus α1-adrenergic blockers alone, with 216 men. Median follow-up of all RCTs was 12 wk. Combining the results of those trials, the use of PDE5-Is alone was associated with a significant improvement of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score (+5.5; p<0.0001) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (-2.8; p<0.0001) but not the maximum flow rate (Q(max)) (-0.00; p=not significant) at the end of the study as compared with placebo. The association of PDE5-Is and α1-adrenergic blockers improved the IIEF score (+3.6; p<0.0001), IPSS score (-1.8; p = 0.05), and Q(max) (+1.5; p<0.0001) at the end of the study as compared with α-blockers alone.. The meta-analysis of the available cross-sectional data suggests that PDE5-Is can significantly improve LUTS and erectile function in men with BPH. PDE5-Is seem to be a promising treatment option for patients with LUTS secondary to BPH with or without ED.

Topics: Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists; Carbolines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Erectile Dysfunction; Humans; Imidazoles; Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms; Male; Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors; Piperazines; Prostatic Hyperplasia; Purines; Pyrimidines; Sildenafil Citrate; Sulfonamides; Sulfones; Tadalafil; Treatment Outcome; Triazines; Vardenafil Dihydrochloride

Postmicturition dribbling (PMD) is a stressful symptom in middle-aged men characterized by urinary leakage after the completion of normal voiding. Appropriate treatments have not yet been introduced. This study assessed the efficacy of treatment of PMD with 75 mg udenafil daily.. The study included 138 men with regular sexual lifestyles. The Hallym PMD questionnaire (HPMDQ) was used to assess PMD symptoms. After all basic examinations, patients were randomly assigned to either udenafil or placebo. Patients completed the surveys, uroflowmetry (UFM), a bladder scan, and the paper test during the follow-up visit.. Udenafil 75 mg once daily can be an effective treatment for patients with PMD symptoms.

Topics: Double-Blind Method; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Prostatic Hyperplasia; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the hemodynamic interactions between udenafil and tamsulosin.. After a placebo lead-in period, 27 healthy volunteers received 200 mg udenafil + tamsulosin placebo, udenafil placebo +0.4 mg tamsulosin, or 200 mg udenafil +0.4 mg tamsulosin. Blood pressure and pulse rate (PR) were measured at 15 time points from 0 to 24 hours.. A single dose of udenafil, when administered with multiple tamsulosin doses, produced statistically significant increases in PR (mean: 10.7; 95% confidence interval: 5.3, 16.2 bpm; p < 0.001) compared with tamsulosin administered with an udenafil placebo. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements remained unchanged. Two subjects who took udenafil with tamsulosin had a decrease in standing systolic blood pressure (SBP) greater than 30 mmHg in comparison to their baseline SBP; however, compared with the frequency of a decrease in standing SBP greater than 30 mmHg in comparison to the baseline, there was no significant difference in frequency among the four treatments (p = 0.243). There was no difference in the Cmax, AUClast, or AUCinf of udenafil and its active metabolite DA-8164 between the administration of udenafil and udenafil with tamsulosin.. The coadministration of udenafil and tamsulosin was not associated with clinically significant hemodynamic changes in healthy volunteers. Although this study was conducted on a small number of healthy young subjects, the use of udenafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in patients taking tamsulosin for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia is not expected to cause significant safety problems.

Topics: Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists; Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists; Adult; Blood Pressure; Double-Blind Method; Drug Interactions; Erectile Dysfunction; Healthy Volunteers; Hemodynamics; Humans; Hypotension, Orthostatic; Male; Middle Aged; Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors; Placebos; Prostatic Hyperplasia; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Tamsulosin; Young Adult

• To evaluate the impact and distribution of a single phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5 I) dose (udenafil or tadalafil) in prostate tissue and plasma in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).. • Thirty BPH patients complaining of erectile dysfunction along with moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) were enrolled in the present study. • The patients were randomly divided into the three groups: group 1, TURP without PDE5 Is; group 2, 200 mg of udenafil given 1 h before TURP; and group 3, 20 mg of tadalafil given 1 h before TURP. • We evaluated the concentrations of PDE5-I, cAMP and cGMP in prostate tissues and plasma, and calculated the prostate tissue-to-plasma (T/P) ratio.. • The concentration of udenafil in prostate tissue and plasma was 2028.6 ± 360.8 ng/g and 463.7 ± 39.1 ng/mL, respectively, and the resulting T/P ratio was 4.4. The tadalafil concentration in prostate tissue and plasma was 385.7 ± 83.8 ng/g and 305.8 ± 41.1 ng/mL, respectively, and the T/P ratio was 1.3. • Udenafil and tadalafil significantly increased the cAMP and cGMP levels in plasma and prostate tissues.. • Udenafil and tadalafil significantly increased cAMP and cGMP levels and were more highly distributed in the prostate than plasma. The T/P ratio of udenafil was higher than tadalafil. • These findings may help in the assessment of the feasibility of using PDE5 Is to concurrently treat both LUTS and erectile dysfunction.

Topics: Aged; Carbolines; Erectile Dysfunction; Feasibility Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors; Prostatic Hyperplasia; Prostatism; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Tadalafil; Treatment Outcome

To assess the relaxation effect of the phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor udenafil on the bladder and prostatic urethra and its therapeutic potentials for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)/lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).. For the in vitro study, muscle strips from urinary bladder and urethra were prepared from male New Zealand rabbits. The strips were mounted in organ baths and connected to force transducers. After stabilization, maximal tissue contractions were obtained by the addition of phenylepinephrine for urethra strips and carbachol for bladder strips. When the contraction was stabilized, a dose-response curve of udenafil was constructed. For the in vivo study using adult male Sprague-Dawley rats, changes of intravesical pressure and urethral perfusion pressure after intraarterial administration of udenafil were monitored.. Udenafil significantly relaxed the bladder and urethra strips in a dose-dependent manner. At 10(-3) M, udenafil induced a significant relaxation of the bladder strips by 37.3% and of the urethra strips by 44.0%. In the in vivo study, the intercontraction interval was significantly prolonged (p < 0.01) and the duration of urethral relaxation with high-frequency oscillations was significantly prolonged (p < 0.01) after udenafil.. Udenafil had relaxant effects on the bladder and prostatic urethral smooth muscle. Clinically, udenafil could be applied as an effective treatment for BPH/LUTS.

Topics: Animals; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Male; Muscle, Smooth; Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors; Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors; Prostate; Prostatic Hyperplasia; Pyrimidines; Rabbits; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Sulfonamides; Urethra; Urinary Bladder; Urinary Tract; Urodynamics

This study was performed to investigate the effect of DA-8159, a selective phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor, on benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) both in vitro and in vivo.. We assessed the influence of DA-8159 on the contractility of rat prostate tissues in an organ-bath experiment. In addition, in order to investigate whether chronic administration of DA-8159 prevents the increase of electrostimulation-induced intraurethral pressure (IUP) responses associated with BPH, BPH was induced by steroid hormones (testosterone plus 17beta-estradiol) and DA-8159 (5, 20 mg/kg) was concomitantly administered once a day for 8 weeks. After that the electrostimulation-induced IUP responses were measured. Finally, we investigated the acute treatment effect of DA-8159 on IUP responses in an established BPH model after a single intravenous injection of DA-8159 (0.3, 1 mg/kg).. DA-8159 concentration-dependently reduced the contraction of the isolated prostate strips with an IC50 value of 70 microM. In chronic treatment study, while the BPH control rats showed a significantly increased IUP both at the baseline and by electrostimulation, the chronic DA-8159 treatment significantly attenuated the increase in IUP responses in a dose- and frequency-dependent manner. In the acute treatment study, a single intravenous injection of DA-8159 also prevented the increase in urethral pressure in a dose-dependent manner.. These results suggest that DA-8159 may be beneficial on lowering the urethral pressure associated with BPH via dilatation of the prostate, but a further evaluation of the efficacy on humans needs to be performed.

Topics: Animals; Disease Models, Animal; Male; Muscle Contraction; Muscle, Smooth; Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors; Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors; Pressure; Prostate; Prostatic Hyperplasia; Pyrimidines; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Rats, Wistar; Sulfonamides; Urethra