cytochalasin-d and Cicatrix

Although parallel alignment of fibroblasts to the tension lines of scar has been evidenced in vivo, how scar contracture generates directional contraction remains largely unclear due to the lack of effective in vitro model. Fibroblast populated collagen lattice (FPCL), a widely used in vitro model, fails to mimic scar contracture since it produces concentric contraction with the random orientation of fibroblast. We hypothesized that a novel FPCL model with fibroblast alignment might produce directional contraction and then simulate scar contracture better. Here, we showed that although direct current electric fields (DCEFs) enabled fibroblasts aligned perpendicularly to the field vector, it also promoted electrotactic migration of fibroblast in FPCL. By contrast, biphasic pulse direct current electric fields (BPDCEFs), featured by reversal of the EF direction periodically, abolished the electrotactic migration, but induced fibroblast alignment in a pulse frequency dependent manner. Specifically, BPDCEF at a pulse frequency of 0.0002 Hz induced fibroblast alignment comparable to that induced by DCEF under the same field strength (300 mV/mm), leading to an enhanced contraction of FPCL along the direction of cell alignment. FPCL pretreated by BPDCEF showed an elliptical contraction whereas it was concentric in control FPCL. Further study revealed that F-actin redistributions acted as a key mechanism for the induction of fibroblasts alignment by BPDCEF. Cytochalasin D, an inhibitor of actin dynamics, abolished F-actins redistribution, and significantly suppressed the fibroblasts alignment and the directional contraction of FPCL. Importantly, BPDCEF significantly increased RhoA activity in fibroblasts, while this response was attenuated by C3 transferase pre-treatment, a potent inhibitor of RhoA, caused F-actin depolymerization and actin filament bundle randomly distributed. Taken together, our study suggests a crucial role for fibroblast orientation in scar contracture, and provides a novel FPCL model that may be feasible and effective for investigating scar contracture in vitro.

Topics: Actins; ADP Ribose Transferases; Animals; Animals, Newborn; Biomechanical Phenomena; Botulinum Toxins; Cell Movement; Cicatrix; Collagen; Cytochalasin D; Electricity; Female; Fibroblasts; Gene Expression; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Models, Biological; Primary Cell Culture; Rats; rho GTP-Binding Proteins; rhoA GTP-Binding Protein; Skin; Surface Tension; Tissue Scaffolds

In many vertebrate inner ear sensory epithelia, dying sensory hair cells are extruded, and the apices of surrounding supporting cells converge to re-seal the epithelial barrier between the electrochemically-distinct endolymph and perilymph. These cellular mechanisms remain poorly understood. Dynamic microtubular mechanisms have been proposed for hair cell extrusion; while contractile actomyosin-based mechanisms are required for cellular extrusion and closure in epithelial monolayers. The hypothesis that cytoskeletal mechanisms are required for hair cell extrusion and supporting cell scar formation was tested using bullfrog saccules incubated with gentamicin (6h), and allowed to recover (18h). Explants were then fixed, labeled for actin and cytokeratins, and viewed with confocal microscopy. To block dynamic cytoskeletal processes, disruption agents for microtubules (colchicine, paclitaxel) myosin (Y-27632, ML-9) or actin (cytochalasin D, latrunculin A) were added during treatment and recovery. Microtubule disruption agents had no effect on hair cell extrusion or supporting cell scar formation. Myosin disruption agents appeared to slow down scar formation but not hair cell extrusion. Actin disruption agents blocked scar formation, and largely prevented hair cell extrusion. These data suggest that actin-based cytoskeletal processes are required for hair cell extrusion and supporting cell scar formation in bullfrog saccules.

Topics: Actins; Amides; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azepines; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Cell Death; Cicatrix; Colchicine; Cytochalasin D; Gentamicins; Hair Cells, Auditory; Immunohistochemistry; Keratins; Microscopy, Confocal; Microscopy, Electron, Transmission; Microtubules; Myosins; Paclitaxel; Pyridines; Rana catesbeiana; Saccule and Utricle; Thiazolidines; Time Factors; Tissue Culture Techniques; Tubulin Modulators; Wound Healing