crizotinib and Central-Nervous-System-Neoplasms

Major issues in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung carcinoma are acquired resistance against anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors and control of central nervous system metastasis. The development of these inhibitors has changed therapeutic strategy in patients with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung carcinoma. Brigatinib and lorlatinib were designed to penetrate the blood-brain barrier and to inhibit resistant mutations against anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors. We review the clinical data supporting treatment of advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung carcinoma with brigatinib and lorlatinib. Brigatinib has shown promising antitumour activity, including substantial activity against central nervous system metastases, in crizotinib-treated (ALTA trial) patients and crizotinib-naïve (ALTA-1L trial) patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung carcinoma. In addition, brigatinib improved progression-free survival compared with crizotinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor-naïve patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung carcinoma. Lorlatinib has demonstrated clinical antitumour activity against both intracranial and extracranial lesions in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase- or c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1)-positive non-small cell lung carcinoma. Ongoing trials and further studies of these agents' biological and clinical properties would provide insight into the optimal therapeutic strategy for administering them to achieve the best survival benefit.

Topics: Aminopyridines; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Crizotinib; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; Lactams; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Lung Neoplasms; Mutation; Organophosphorus Compounds; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines

The revolution in individualized therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has seen the emergence of a number of molecularly targeted therapies for distinct patient molecular subgroups. Activating anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-gene rearrangement has been detected in 3-7 % of NSCLC cases, and the ALK inhibitor crizotinib is now an approved treatment for patients with tumors harboring this event. However, resistance to ALK-targeted therapies is a ubiquitous problem in the management of advanced ALK-positive NSCLC and can be mediated by secondary kinase mutations or the activation of compensatory alternative oncogenic drivers. New, more potent ALK inhibitors such as ceritinib (LDK378), alectinib (CH5424802), and AP26113 are now emerging, together with an increased knowledge of the molecular basis of resistance. There is a need to evaluate the optimal clinical application of these new agents, either as sequential therapies or in combination with other targeted agents, to combat resistance and prolong survival in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. The remarkable clinical activity of ALK inhibitors also emphasizes the importance of optimal diagnostic testing algorithms, to ensure that all eligible patients receive these breakthrough therapies.

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Crizotinib; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Mutation; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths in the world with 1.69 million deaths in 2015. A total of 85% of lung cancer cases are non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Driver mutations associated with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) have been identified in a variety of malignancies, including NSCLC. An ALK inhibitor (crizotinib, ceritinib and alectinib) is the preferred therapeutic approach to those advanced ALK fusion variant-positive NSCLC patients. Brigatinib, a next-generation ALK inhibitor, shows promising activity in ALK-rearranged NSCLC that have previously received crizotinib with response rates in ALTA ranging from 42-50%, intracranial response 42-67% and median progression-free survival 9.2-12.9 months. Randomized Phase III trial, ALTA-1 L is investigating brigatinib in ALK inhibitor-naive patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Crizotinib; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation; Neoplasm Proteins; Oncogene Proteins, Fusion; Organophosphorus Compounds; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases

This is the first trial to directly compare efficacy and safety of alectinib versus standard chemotherapy in advanced/metastatic anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who have progressed on, or were intolerant to, crizotinib.. ALUR (MO29750; NCT02604342) was a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III trial of alectinib versus chemotherapy in advanced/metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC patients previously treated with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy and crizotinib. Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to receive alectinib 600 mg twice daily or chemotherapy (pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 or docetaxel 75 mg/m2, both every 3 weeks) until disease progression, death, or withdrawal. Primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS).. Altogether, 107 patients were randomized (alectinib, n = 72; chemotherapy, n = 35) in 13 countries across Europe and Asia. Median investigator-assessed PFS was 9.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.9-12.2] with alectinib and 1.4 months (95% CI: 1.3-1.6) with chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.15 (95% CI: 0.08-0.29); P < 0.001]. Independent Review Committee-assessed PFS was also significantly longer with alectinib [HR 0.32 (95% CI: 0.17-0.59); median PFS was 7.1 months (95% CI: 6.3-10.8) with alectinib and 1.6 months (95% CI: 1.3-4.1) with chemotherapy]. In patients with measurable baseline central nervous system (CNS) disease (alectinib, n = 24; chemotherapy, n = 16), CNS objective response rate was significantly higher with alectinib (54.2%) versus chemotherapy (0%; P < 0.001). Grade ≥3 adverse events were more common with chemotherapy (41.2%) than alectinib (27.1%). Incidence of AEs leading to study-drug discontinuation was lower with alectinib (5.7%) than chemotherapy (8.8%), despite alectinib treatment duration being longer (20.1 weeks versus 6.0 weeks).. Alectinib significantly improved systemic and CNS efficacy versus chemotherapy for crizotinib-pretreated ALK-positive NSCLC patients, with a favorable safety profile.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02604342; Roche study MO29750.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Crizotinib; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Lymphatic Metastasis; Male; Middle Aged; Pemetrexed; Piperidines; Prognosis; Salvage Therapy; Survival Rate

Alectinib, a highly selective inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), has shown systemic and central nervous system (CNS) efficacy in the treatment of ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated alectinib as compared with crizotinib in patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, including those with asymptomatic CNS disease.. In a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 303 patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC to receive either alectinib (600 mg twice daily) or crizotinib (250 mg twice daily). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary end points were independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival, time to CNS progression, objective response rate, and overall survival.. During a median follow-up of 17.6 months (crizotinib) and 18.6 months (alectinib), an event of disease progression or death occurred in 62 of 152 patients (41%) in the alectinib group and 102 of 151 patients (68%) in the crizotinib group. The rate of investigator-assessed progression-free survival was significantly higher with alectinib than with crizotinib (12-month event-free survival rate, 68.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 61.0 to 75.9] with alectinib vs. 48.7% [95% CI, 40.4 to 56.9] with crizotinib; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.34 to 0.65]; P<0.001); the median progression-free survival with alectinib was not reached. The results for independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival were consistent with those for the primary end point. A total of 18 patients (12%) in the alectinib group had an event of CNS progression, as compared with 68 patients (45%) in the crizotinib group (cause-specific hazard ratio, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.28; P<0.001). A response occurred in 126 patients in the alectinib group (response rate, 82.9%; 95% CI, 76.0 to 88.5) and in 114 patients in the crizotinib group (response rate, 75.5%; 95% CI, 67.8 to 82.1) (P=0.09). Grade 3 to 5 adverse events were less frequent with alectinib (41% vs. 50% with crizotinib).. As compared with crizotinib, alectinib showed superior efficacy and lower toxicity in primary treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; ALEX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02075840 .).

Topics: Adult; Aged, 80 and over; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Crizotinib; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Young Adult

Findings from the global phase III ALEX trial unequivocally show that alectinib is superior to crizotinib as first-line therapy for ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer. Alectinib more than doubled progression-free survival, significantly reduced the incidence of brain and CNS metastases, and should be considered the new standard of care.

Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Crizotinib; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; Neoplasm Metastasis; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases

Central nervous system (CNS) progression is common in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving crizotinib. Next-generation ALK inhibitors have shown activity against CNS metastases, but accurate assessment of response and progression is vital. Data from two phase II studies in crizotinib-refractory ALK+ NSCLC were pooled to examine the CNS efficacy of alectinib, a CNS-active ALK inhibitor, using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST version 1.1) and Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology high-grade glioma (RANO-HGG) criteria.. Both studies enrolled patients aged ≥18 years who had previously received crizotinib. NP28761 was conducted in North America and NP28673 was a global study. All patients received 600 mg oral alectinib twice daily and had baseline CNS imaging. CNS response for those with baseline CNS metastases was determined by an independent review committee.. Baseline measurable CNS disease was identified in 50 patients by RECIST and 43 by RANO-HGG. CNS objective response rate was 64.0% by RECIST (95% confidence interval [CI]: 49.2-77.1; 11 CNS complete responses [CCRs]) and 53.5% by RANO-HGG (95% CI: 37.7-68.8; eight CCRs). CNS responses were durable, with consistent estimates of median duration of 10.8 months with RECIST and 11.1 months with RANO-HGG. Of the 39 patients with measurable CNS disease by both RECIST and RANO-HGG, only three (8%) had CNS progression according to one criteria but not the other (92% concordance rate).. Alectinib demonstrated promising efficacy in the CNS for ALK+ NSCLC patients pretreated with crizotinib, regardless of the assessment criteria used.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Crizotinib; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; Retrospective Studies; Young Adult

Crizotinib confers improved progression-free survival compared with chemotherapy in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but progression invariably occurs. We investigated the efficacy and safety of alectinib, a potent and selective ALK inhibitor with excellent CNS penetration, in patients with crizotinib-refractory ALK-positive NSCLC.. Alectinib 600 mg was administered orally twice daily. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) by central independent review committee (IRC).. Of the 138 patients treated, 84 patients (61%) had CNS metastases at baseline, and 122 were response evaluable (RE) by IRC. ORR by IRC was 50% (95% CI, 41% to 59%), and the median duration of response (DOR) was 11.2 months (95% CI, 9.6 months to not reached). In 96 patients (79%) previously treated with chemotherapy, the ORR was 45% (95% CI, 35% to 55%). Median IRC-assessed progression-free survival for all 138 patients was 8.9 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 11.3 months). CNS disease control rate was 83% (95% CI, 74% to 91%), and the median CNS DOR was 10.3 months (95% CI, 7.6 to 11.2 months). CNS ORR in 35 patients with baseline measurable CNS lesions was 57% (95% CI, 39% to 74%). Of the 23 patients with baseline CNS metastases (measurable or nonmeasurable) and no prior radiation, 10 (43%) had a complete CNS response. At 12 months, the cumulative CNS progression rate (24.8%) was lower than the cumulative non-CNS progression rate (33.2%) for all patients. Common adverse events were constipation (33%), fatigue (26%), and peripheral edema (25%); most were grade 1 to 2.. Alectinib is highly active and well tolerated in patients with advanced, crizotinib-refractory ALK-positive NSCLC, including those with CNS metastases.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Crizotinib; Disease Progression; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Treatment Outcome

Purpose Alectinib has shown activity in the CNS in phase I and II studies. To further evaluate this activity, we pooled efficacy and safety data from two single-arm phase II studies (NP28761 and NP28673; ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01871805 and NCT01801111, respectively) in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods Both studies included patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who had previously received crizotinib; all patients received alectinib 600 mg twice per day. The primary end point in both studies was independent review committee (IRC)-assessed objective response rate (ORR; by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] version 1.1). Additional end points (all by IRC) included CNS ORR (CORR), CNS disease control rate (CDCR), and CNS duration of response (CDOR). Results One hundred thirty-six patients had baseline CNS metastases (60% of the overall study populations); 50 patients (37%) had measurable CNS disease at baseline. Ninety-five patients (70%) had prior CNS radiotherapy; 55 patients completed the CNS radiotherapy more than 6 months before starting alectinib. Median follow-up time was 12.4 months (range, 0.9 to 19.7 months). For patients with baseline measurable CNS disease, IRC CORR was 64.0% (95% CI, 49.2% to 77.1%), CDCR was 90.0% (95% CI, 78.2% to 96.7%), and median CDOR was 10.8 months (95% CI, 7.6 to 14.1 months). For patients with measurable and/or nonmeasurable baseline CNS disease, IRC CORR was 42.6% (95% CI, 34.2% to 51.4%), CDCR was 85.3% (95% CI, 78.2% to 90.8%), and median CDOR was 11.1 months (95% CI, 10.3 months to not evaluable). CORR was 35.8% (95% CI, 26.2% to 46.3%) for patients with prior radiotherapy (n = 95) and 58.5% (95% CI, 42.1% to 73.7%) for patients without prior radiotherapy (n = 41). As previously reported, alectinib was well tolerated, regardless of baseline CNS disease. Conclusion Alectinib showed good efficacy against CNS metastases, in addition to systemic activity, in crizotinib-refractory ALK-positive NSCLC.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Crizotinib; Endpoint Determination; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Treatment Outcome

Crizotinib is the approved treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion. Failure of crizotinib treatment frequently involves drug intolerance or resistance. Comparison of using second-generation ALK inhibitors in this setting remains lacking.. Sixty-five ALK-positive advanced NSCLC patients receiving second-generation ALK inhibitors following treatment failure of crizotinib were retrospectively analyzed for the therapeutic efficacy.. Forty-three (66.2%) and 22 (33.8%) patients received alectinib and ceritinib, respectively. Comparing alectinib to ceritinib treatment: the 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate (61.0% [95% confidence interval, 47.1 to 78.9%] vs. 54.5% [95% CI, 37.3 to 79.9%]); the hazard ratio (HR) for disease progression or death, 0.61 (95% CI, 0.31-1.17; p = 0.135). Multivariate Cox regression showed ECOG PS (0-1 vs. 2-3 HR 0.09 [95% CI, 0.02-0.33]; p < 0.001) and cause of crizotinib treatment failure (resistance vs. intolerance HR 2.75 [95% CI, 1.26-5.99]; p = 0.011) were the independent predictors for the PFS of second-generation ALK inhibitors. Treatment of alectinib, compared to ceritinib, was associated with a lower incidence of CNS progression (cause-specific HR, 0.10; 95% CI 0.01-0.78; p = 0.029) and a higher efficacy in patients whose cause of crizotinib treatment failure was intolerance (HR 0.29 [95% CI, 0.08-1.06]; p = 0.050). The most commonly noted adverse events were elevated AST/ALT in 10 (23.3%) patients treated with alectinib and diarrhea in 8 (36.4%) patients treated with ceritinib.. Second-generation ALK inhibitors in crizotinib-treated patients showed a satifactory efficacy. Alectinib treatment demonstrated a CNS protection activity and a higher PFS in selected patients failing crizotinib treatment.

Topics: Aged; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Crizotinib; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Oncogene Proteins, Fusion; Piperidines; Progression-Free Survival; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Taiwan

Most patients treated with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors for ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop resistance, leading to metastasis, with progression to the central nervous system (CNS) being a primary concern. Although alectinib has better CNS penetration than crizotinib, patients treated with alectinib also develop CNS progression. CNS metastases more likely occurs during crizotinib treatment due to less blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration capability than alectinib. CNS progression pattern may be different during crizotinib and alecitinib treatment. Understanding the characteristics of CNS progression is important for developing treatment strategies.. We compared the clinical-radiographic characteristics of CNS metastases among patients undergoing crizotinib and alectinib treatment for ALK-positive NSCLCs.. We retrospectively analyzed the radiographic and clinical characteristics of CNS progression in ALK-positive NSCLC patients treated with crizotinib or alectinib at our hospital between July 2011 and May 2020. CNS and systemic tumor progression were evaluated using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Fifty-three and 65 patients were treated with crizotinib and alectinib, respectively. Baseline CNS metastasis was observed in 18 and 27 patients in the crizotinib and alectinib groups, respectively. Among the patients in the crizotinib and alectinib groups who developed disease progression, 15/49 (30.6%) and 9/44 (20.5%) had CNS progression, respectively (P = .344). Intra-CNS progression-free survival was significantly longer in the alectinib group than in the crizotinib group (median: 14.0 vs 5.6 months, P = .042). The number of CNS metastases sized ≥3 cm, rate of peritumoral brain edema, and the second progression pattern after treatment continuation was not significantly different between the groups.. We observed no significant difference in the clinical-radiographic characteristics of CNS progression between patients undergoing crizotinib and alectinib treatments. Local therapy, including stereotactic radiosurgery, for CNS progression may be suitable and important following alectinib and crizotinib treatment.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Crizotinib; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Piperidines; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Survival Rate; Young Adult

Central nervous system (CNS) progression is a common manifestation of acquired resistance to crizotinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, an optimal tailored treatment approach has not been established in patients with CNS failure during crizotinib treatment.. Patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC with CNS progression during crizotinib treatment between January 2013 and December 2016 were included for analysis. Clinical data for different treatments after CNS failure during crizotinib treatment were retrospectively collected.. Among the 44 patients who had CNS progression during crizotinib treatment, 19, 15, 8, and 2 patients received crizotinib treatment beyond progressive disease (CBPD), a second ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), chemotherapy, and best supportive care, respectively. Post progression survival offered by treatment with a second ALK TKI was significantly more favorable than that of chemotherapy (P < .001) or CBPD (P = .045). In addition, patients who received sequential treatment with a second ALK TKI had significantly longer intracranial time to progression (IC-TTP) compared with those treated with chemotherapy (P < .01) or CBPD after radiotherapy (P = .003). In the 7 patients who received brigatinib, the median IC-TTP was 21.8 months (95% confidence interval, 11.7-32.0). The additional use of CNS radiotherapy in patients treated with a second ALK TKI showed no significance in terms of IC-TTP (P = .54).. Although CBPD is an option in patients with isolated CNS progression during crizotinib treatment, sequential treatment with a second ALK TKI, particularly brigatinib, might be preferable. The newly approved TKI, brigatinib, showed promise in the control of brain metastases, even without radiotherapy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Crizotinib; Female; Gene Rearrangement; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Staging; Organophosphorus Compounds; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Retrospective Studies; Survival Analysis

We determined the central nervous system (CNS) efficacy of alectinib by calculating time to CNS progression and cumulative incidence rates (CIRs) of CNS progression, non-CNS progression and death in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) enrolled in the J-ALEX phase III study.. Japanese patients aged ≥20 years with ALK-positive NSCLC who were ALK inhibitor-naïve and chemotherapy-naïve, or who had received one previous chemotherapy regimen, were enrolled. Patients with treated or untreated asymptomatic CNS metastases were eligible. Treatment comprised oral alectinib 300 mg twice daily or crizotinib 250 mg twice daily until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, death or withdrawal. Imaging scans (computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging) were taken at baseline and at regular intervals throughout the study. The CIRs for CNS progression, non-CNS progression and death were calculated for patients with and without baseline CNS metastases using a competing risks method.. The hazard ratio for time to CNS progression in patients with and without baseline CNS metastases was 0.51 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.16-1.64; P = 0.2502) and 0.19 (95% CI: 0.07-0.53; P = 0.0004), respectively. The CIRs of CNS progression and non-CNS progression were lower in the alectinib group than in the crizotinib group at all time points. The 1-year CIRs of CNS progression were 16.8% and 5.9% with crizotinib and alectinib, respectively, and the 1-year CIRs of non-CNS progression were 38.4% and 17.5%, respectively. Comparable findings were obtained in patients with or without baseline CNS metastases.. Alectinib appears to avert the progression of CNS metastases in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC and baseline CNS metastases, and to prevent the development of new CNS lesions in patients without baseline CNS disease.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Antineoplastic Agents; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Central Nervous System; Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Crizotinib; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Japan; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Treatment Outcome

Glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) are believed to be involved in the mechanisms of tumor resistance, therapeutic failures, and recurrences after conventional glioblastoma therapy. Therefore, elimination of GSCs might be a prerequisite for the development of successful therapeutic strategies. ALK, ROS1, and MET are targeted by Crizotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor which has been approved for treatment of ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer. In this study we investigated ALK, ROS1, and MET status in nine glioblastoma stem cell lines and tumors from which they arise. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), Sanger's direct sequencing, and immunohistochemistry were used to screen genomic rearrangements (or amplifications), genomic mutations, and protein expression, respectively. The immunohistochemical and FISH studies revealed no significant dysregulation of ROS1 in GSCs and associated tumors. Neither amplification nor polysomy of ALK was observed in GSC, but weak overexpression was detected by IHC in three of nine GSCs. Similarly, no MET amplification was found by FISH but three GSCs presented significant immunohistochemical staining. No ALK or MET mutation was found by Sanger's direct sequencing. In this study, we show no molecular rearrangement of ALK, ROS1, and MET that would lead us not to propose, as a valid strategy, the use of crizotinib to eradicate GSCs. However, MET was overexpressed in all GSCs with mesenchymal subtype and three GSCs presented an overexpression of ALK. Therefore, our study corroborates the idea that MET and ALK may assume a role in the tumorigenicity of GSC.

Topics: Aged; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Cell Line, Tumor; Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Crizotinib; DNA Mutational Analysis; Female; Glioblastoma; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neoplastic Stem Cells; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases