colistin and Healthcare-Associated-Pneumonia

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteremia; Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae; Colistin; Creatinine; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Enterobacteriaceae Infections; Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated; Sample Size; Sisomicin

In clinical practice, colistin is used as combination therapy to improve its antibacterial activity, despite the consequent increase in toxicity. This prospective, comparative study evaluated the effectiveness and adverse effects of using colistin alone at a loading dose of 9 million international units (MIU) followed by 3 MIU every 8h (q8h) versus colistin+meropenem 1g q8h in treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) Klebsiella pneumoniae-induced hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. The secondary measure was the occurrence of colistin toxicity.. A total of 60 patients were divided into two groups (30 patients each); the first group received intravenous colistin at a mean daily dose of 8.304 MIU and the second group received colistin 8.58 MIU combined with meropenem (mean daily dose of 2.88g for 15 days).. The colistin-meropenem combination group showed a significant decrease in mortality versus colistin alone [16.7% (5/30) vs. 43.3% (13/30); P=0.047]. The improved clinical response mediated by combination therapy was not associated with any significant nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity or neurotoxicity. Moreover, the 42 surviving patients showed normal procalcitonin values associated with a decrease in SOFA score, whilst 12 of them showed significantly elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) (P=0.0002).. This study revealed the superiority of colistin-meropenem combination therapy over colistin monotherapy in the treatment of MDR K. pneumoniae-induced HAP or VAP and highlights the advantage of procalcitonin over CRP as a marker for eradication of sepsis and suspension of therapy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Colistin; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia; Humans; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated; Prospective Studies

Nosocomial pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CRGNB) is a growing threat due to the limited therapeutic choices and high mortality rate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic factors for mortality in patients with nosocomial pneumonia caused by CRGNB and the impact of colistin-based therapy on the outcomes of intensive care unit (ICU) patients. We conducted a retrospective study of the ICUs in five tertiary teaching hospitals in Taiwan. Patients with nosocomial pneumonia caused by CRGNB from January 2016 to December 2016 were included. Prognostic factors for mortality were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. The influence of colistin-based therapy on mortality and clinical and microbiological outcomes were evaluated in subgroups using different severity stratification criteria. A total of 690 patients were enrolled in the study, with an in-hospital mortality of 46.1%. The most common CRGNB pathogens were Acinetobacter baumannii (78.7%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (13.0%). Significant predictors (odds ratio and 95% confidence interval) of mortality from multivariate analysis were a length of hospital stay (LOS) prior to pneumonia of longer than 9 days (2.18, 1.53-3.10), a sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score of more than 7 (2.36, 1.65-3.37), supportive care with vasopressor therapy (3.21, 2.26-4.56), and escalation of antimicrobial therapy (0.71, 0.50-0.99). There were no significant differences between the colistin-based therapy in the deceased and survival groups (42.1% vs. 42.7%, p = 0.873). In the subgroup analysis, patients with multiple organ involvement (> 2 organs) or higher SOFA score (> 7) receiving colistin-based therapy had better survival outcomes. Prolonged LOS prior to pneumonia onset, high SOFA score, vasopressor requirement, and timely escalation of antimicrobial therapy were predictors for mortality in critically ill patients with nosocomial CRGNB pneumonia. Colistin-based therapy was associated with better survival outcomes in subgroups of patients with a SOFA score of more than 7 and multiple organ involvement.

Topics: Acinetobacter baumannii; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Carbapenems; Colistin; Critical Illness; Cross Infection; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia; Humans; Retrospective Studies

To investigate the association between adjunctive nebulized colistin and treatment outcomes in critically ill patients with nosocomial carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial (CR-GNB) pneumonia.. This retrospective, multi-centre, cohort study included individuals admitted to the intensive care unit with nosocomial pneumonia caused by colistin-susceptible CR-GNB. Enrolled patients were divided into groups with/without nebulized colistin as adjunct to at least one effective intravenous antibiotic. Propensity score matching was performed in the original cohort (model 1) and a time-window bias-adjusted cohort (model 2). The association between adjunctive nebulized colistin and treatment outcomes was analysed.. In total, 181 and 326 patients treated with and without nebulized colistin, respectively, were enrolled for analysis. The day 14 clinical failure rate and mortality rate were 41.4% (75/181) versus 46% (150/326), and 14.9% (27/181) versus 21.8% (71/326), respectively. In the propensity score-matching analysis, patients with nebulized colistin had lower day 14 clinical failure rates (model 1: 41% (68/166) versus 54.2% (90/166), p 0.016; model 2: 35.3% (41/116) versus 56.9% (66/116), p 0.001). On multivariate analysis, nebulized colistin was an independent factor associated with fewer day 14 clinical failures (model 1: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.92; model 2: aOR 0.37, 95% CI 0.21-0.65). Nebulized colistin was not associated independently with a lower 14-day mortality rate in the time-dependent analysis in both models 1 and 2.. Adjunctive nebulized colistin was associated with lower day 14 clinical failure rate, but not lower 14-day mortality rate, in critically ill patients with nosocomial pneumonia caused by colistin-susceptible CR-GNB.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Carbapenems; Colistin; Critical Illness; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia; Humans; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Colistin; Cross Infection; Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia; Hospitals; Humans; Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated

To compare the effectiveness and safety of aerosolized (AER) plus intravenous (IV) colistin with IV colistin alone in patients with nosocomial pneumonia (NP) due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria.. This was a retrospective cohort study of adults with NP who received IV colistin alone or in combination with AER colistin. The primary endpoint was clinical cure at end of therapy. Secondary endpoints included microbiological eradication, in-hospital mortality and nephrotoxicity.. In total, 135 patients were included in this study: 65 patients received AER plus IV colistin and 70 patients received IV colistin alone. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Clinical cure was achieved in 42 (65%) patients who received AER plus IV colistin and 26 (37%) patients who received IV colistin alone (P = 0.01). Among a total of 88 patients who were microbiologically evaluable, 27 (42%) patients who received AER plus IV colistin and 12 (17%) patients who received IV colistin alone attained favourable microbiological outcomes (P = 0.022). In-hospital mortality (43% vs 59%, P = 0.072) was higher in patients who received IV colistin alone, but the difference was not significant. Renal injury occurred in 31% of patients who received AER plus IV colistin and in 41% of patients who received IV colistin alone (P = 0.198).. AER colistin can be considered as salvage therapy as an adjunct to IV administration for the treatment of patients with NP due to MDR Gram-negative pathogens.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Colistin; Cross Infection; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia; Humans; Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Background Gram negative pathogens are increasingly resistant to commonly used first line antibiotics and colistin is in most cases the only medicine available. There is very limited information available comparing the effectiveness and costs of low versus high dose colistin with studies showing efficacy with both doses and with variable levels of adverse effects. The absence of a definite dosing strategy makes a model to compare low dose and high dose colistin invaluable in making decisions regarding the appropriate use of colistin. Objective This study was designed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of low versus high dose colistin in the treatment of Pneumonia caused by colistin-only sensitive gram negative bacteria from the perspective of a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. Setting 300-bed tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. Method A retrospective review was conducted to compare the costs and outcomes of treatment of pneumonia with low versus high dose colistin. The model followed an average patient from initiation of treatment until clinical cure or failure. Main outcome measures The main outcomes were cure, nephrotoxicity, total direct costs per episode, cost per additional cure and cost per nephrotoxicity avoided. Results There was no significant difference between high and low dose colistin with regards to clinical cure (30% vs. 21%; p = 0.292). Significantly more patients experienced nephrotoxicity with high versus low dose colistin (30% vs. 8%; p = 0.004). With low dose colistin the incremental costs per nephrotoxicity avoided was SAR-3056.28. One-way sensitivity analyses did not change the overall results. Conclusion Low dose was not inferior to high dose colistin in terms of clinical cure and had a lower incidence of nephrotoxicity resulting in significant cost avoidance.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Clinical Decision-Making; Colistin; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Female; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Retrospective Studies; Saudi Arabia; Treatment Outcome