cnv1014802 and Trigeminal-Neuralgia

Vixotrigine is a voltage and use dependent sodium channel blocker currently under development for treatment of various neuropathic pain indications.. The objective of this work was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model and assess effects of various covariates on pharmacokinetic parameters of vixotrigine.. Plasma concentration-time data from 12 Phase 1 or 2 studies were included in the analyses. The data were obtained following administration of single or multiple doses of vixotrigine in healthy volunteers and patients. One- and two-compartment pharmacokinetic models were evaluated as base structural pharmacokinetic models. The inclusion of selected covariates was assessed using a stepwise backward elimination approach (α = 0.001) once the base/full model was developed. The predictive ability of the model was evaluated using a visual predictive check (VPC). The final model was used to evaluate effect of covariates on exposure of vixotrigine.. A total of 10,263 pharmacokinetic samples collected from 465 subjects were included in the analyses. The pharmacokinetics of vixotrigine was adequately described by a two-compartment model with two transit absorption compartments and first-order elimination. Predictability of the model was also established by VPC. The final model included covariates of age, weight and carbamazepine co-administration on clearance, weight on central volume of distribution, food on absorption rate constant and formulation and Japanese race on bioavailability. None of the covariates identified had a clinically relevant effect, as impact on area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (C. The model characterizes the pharmacokinetics of vixotrigine well, and the exposure of vixotrigine was comparable between healthy subjects and patients. None of the covariates evaluated have a clinically relevant impact on the pharmacokinetics of vixotrigine.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Area Under Curve; Asian People; Biological Availability; Erythromelalgia; Female; Food-Drug Interactions; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Phenyl Ethers; Proline; Radiculopathy; Tissue Distribution; Trigeminal Neuralgia; Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers; Young Adult

Despite recent advances in understanding and treating trigeminal neuralgia, its management remains a considerable challenge. Better classification of different types of facial pain and the identification of prognostic factors for different treatment options lead the way toward better quality of life for the individual patient. Although the principles of treating trigeminal neuralgia remain basically the same, antiepileptic drugs, muscle relaxants, and neuroleptic agents are widely used medical treatment options. They were not originally developed for treating trigeminal neuralgia. Carbamazepine was studied in adequate placebo-controlled clinical trials in the 1960s and is still considered the most effective drug. Among emerging treatment options currently under clinical investigation are local botulinum neurotoxin type A injections and a novel sodium channel blocker (CNV1014802) that selectively blocks the Na

Topics: Carbamazepine; Humans; Phenyl Ethers; Proline; Quality of Life; Radiosurgery; Sodium Channel Blockers; Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation; Trigeminal Neuralgia

Trigeminal neuralgia is a representative neuropathic facial pain condition, characterised by unilateral paroxysmal pain in the distribution territory of one or more divisions of the trigeminal nerve, triggered by innocuous stimuli. A subgroup of patients with trigeminal neuralgia [TN (previously defined as atypical TN)] also suffer from concomitant continuous pain, i.e. a background pain between the paroxysmal attacks. The aim of this review is to provide current, evidence-based, knowledge about the pharmacological treatment of typical and atypical TN, with a specific focus on drugs in development. We searched for relevant papers within PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Clinical Trials database (ClinicalTrials.gov), taking into account publications up to February 2018. Two authors independently selected studies for inclusions, data extraction, and bias assessment. Carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine are the first-choice drugs for paroxysmal pain. When sodium channel blockers cannot reach full dosage because of side effects, an add-on treatment with lamotrigine or baclofen should be considered. In patients with atypical TN, both gabapentin and antidepressants are expected to be efficacious and should be tried as an add-on to oxcarbazepine or carbamazepine. Although carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine are effective in virtually the totality of patients, they are responsible for side effects causing withdrawal from treatment in an important percentage of cases. A new, better tolerated, Nav1.7 selective state-dependent, sodium channel blocker (vixotrigine) is under development. Future trials testing the effect of combination therapy in patients with TN are needed, especially in patients with concomitant continuous pain and in TN secondary to multiple sclerosis.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Antidepressive Agents; Baclofen; Carbamazepine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Gabapentin; Humans; Lamotrigine; Oxcarbazepine; Phenyl Ethers; Proline; Sodium Channel Blockers; Trigeminal Neuralgia

Current standard of care for trigeminal neuralgia is treatment with the sodium channel blockers carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine, which although effective are associated with poor tolerability and the need for titration. BIIB074, a Nav1.7-selective, state-dependent sodium-channel blocker, can be administered at therapeutic doses without titration, and has shown good tolerability in healthy individuals in phase 1 studies. We therefore assessed the safety and efficacy of BIIB074 in patients with trigeminal neuralgia in a phase 2a study.. We did a double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled, randomised withdrawal phase 2a trial in 25 secondary care centres in Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, and the UK. After a 7-day run-in phase, eligible patients aged 18-80 years with confirmed trigeminal neuralgia received open-label, BIIB074 150 mg three times per day, orally, for 21 days. Patients who met at least one response criteria were then randomly assigned (1:1) to BIIB074 or placebo for up to 28 days in a double-blind phase. We used an interactive web response system to assign patients with a computer-generated schedule, with stratification (presence or absence of existing pain medication). Patients, clinicians, and assessors were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was the difference between groups in the number of patients classified as treatment failure during the double blind phase assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population. We assessed safety in all patients who received one or more doses of BIIB074. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01540630) and EudraCT (2010-023963-16).. The first patient was enrolled on April 23, 2012, and the last patient completed the study on February 26, 2014. We enrolled 67 patients into the open-label phase; 44 completed open-label treatment, and 29 were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment (15 to BIIB074 and 14 to placebo). During the double-blind phase, five (33%) patients assigned to BIIB074 versus nine (64%) assigned to placebo were classified as treatment failures (p=0·0974). BIIB074 was well tolerated, with similar adverse events in the double-blind phase to placebo. Headache was the most common adverse event with BIIB074 in the open-label phase (in 13 [19%] of 67 patients), followed by dizziness (in six [9%] patients). In the double-blind phase, headache, pyrexia, nasopharyngitis, sleep disorder, and tremor were the most frequent adverse events in patients assigned to BIIB074 (in one [7%] of 15 patients for each event), and headache, dizziness, diarrhoea, and vomiting were the most frequent adverse events in patients assigned to placebo (in one [7%] of 14 patients for each event). No severe or serious adverse events were reported in the BIIB074 group during the double-blind phase. One patient assigned to placebo reported intestinal adhesions with obstruction as a severe and serious adverse event, which was considered as unrelated to study medication.. The primary endpoint of treatment failure was not significantly lower in the BIIB074 group than in the placebo group. However, our findings provide a basis for continued investigation of BIIB074 in patients with trigeminal neuralgia in future clinical trials.. Convergence Pharmaceuticals.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Area Under Curve; Double-Blind Method; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; International Cooperation; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Phenyl Ethers; Proline; Retrospective Studies; Sodium Channel Blockers; Treatment Outcome; Trigeminal Neuralgia; Young Adult

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a rare severe unilateral facial pain condition. Current guidelines in trigeminal neuralgia management recommend sodium channel blockers--carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine--as the first-line treatment. However, the currently available drugs are often associated with poor tolerability resulting in sub-optimal pain control. CNV1014802 is a novel sodium channel blocker that is being assessed in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Due to the severity of the condition, it is not ethical to conduct a traditional placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial. It is also difficult to use an active control such as carbamazepine, the current gold standard, because of its complex pharmacology and potential for drug interactions.. The trial uses a randomized withdrawal design to assess efficacy in this rare condition. There is a 21-day open-label phase followed by a randomized 28-day placebo-controlled phase for responders. Thirty patients will be randomized. The primary outcome measure will be pain relief, but secondary measures of quality of life will be of significant importance given the effect of this condition on activities of daily living. Safety and adverse event endpoints are described.. There have been very few well-controlled, randomized, placebo-controlled studies in trigeminal neuralgia, and the majority of drugs have had other primary uses. Due to the severity of the pain, minimizing the time a patient is administered placebo was a key factor in designing this study. This study will not only provide data on the efficacy of CNV1014802 in trigeminal neuralgia, but will also provide information on the effectiveness and acceptability of a novel trial design in trigeminal neuralgia.. Trial number NCT01540630.

Topics: Double-Blind Method; Humans; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Phenyl Ethers; Proline; Research Design; Sodium Channel Blockers; Trigeminal Neuralgia; Withholding Treatment