cloprostenol and Exfoliation-Syndrome

To evaluate efficacy and safety data of currently available ocular hypotensive medicines derived from 24-hour studies, of similar design, in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), exfoliative glaucoma, or ocular hypertension (OH).. Meta-analysis of published articles evaluating patients with POAG, exfoliative glaucoma, or OH.. We included articles that were randomized, prospective, single- or double-masked, comparative studies of ocular hypotensive therapies over 24 hours. Each article selected contained an untreated baseline, >or=4-week treatment period, >/=20 patients per treatment arm, and >or=6 time points not spaced >5 hours apart and used Goldmann applanation or Tonopen tonometry (supine measurements) to measure intraocular pressure (IOP).. Twenty-four-hour IOP efficacy.. This analysis included 864 separate 24-hour treatment curves from 386 patients in 28 treatment arms from 11 studies. A statistical difference in the mean diurnal pressure decrease existed between monotherapy treatments for POAG/OH patients, with bimatoprost (29%) and travoprost (27%) showing the greatest 24-hour reduction (P = 0.026). Timolol 0.5% was less effective than latanoprost (24% vs. 19% reduction) but decreased the pressure at each night time point (P = 0.0003). Dorzolamide showed a 19% 24-hour pressure reduction and brimonidine 0.2% a 14% one. In exfoliative glaucoma patients, latanoprost and travoprost showed higher baseline and treatment pressures, although the pressure reductions (29% and 31%, respectively) were greater generally than observed with POAG/OH. An evening-dosed latanoprost/timolol fixed combination reduced the pressure 33%, and the dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination (DTFC), 26%. However, the power to detect a difference for this specific comparison was probably low, due to the limited number of patients (n = 20) in the DTFC group. A statistical difference between evening-dosed (24%) and morning-dosed (18%) latanoprost (P<0.0001) was noted, but not between evening (27%) and morning (26%) travoprost (P = 0.074). The mean reduction of night time points was statistically lower than day time points for latanoprost (P = 0.031), timolol (P = 0.032), and brimonidine (P = 0.050), but not for dorzolamide. Dorzolamide (P = 0.60), travoprost (P = 0.064), and bimatoprost (P = 0.057) did not demonstrate nighttime pressures lower than daytime ones. The mean reduction of night time points was statistically lower than that of day time points for latanoprost (P = 0.031), timolol (P = 0.032), and brimonidine (P = 0.050), but not for dorzolamide (P = 0.60), bimatoprost (P = 0.057), travoprost (P = 0.064).. Similar relative efficacies generally exist in various classes of ocular hypotensive agents during night and day hours.

Topics: Amides; Antihypertensive Agents; Bimatoprost; Circadian Rhythm; Cloprostenol; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exfoliation Syndrome; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Latanoprost; Ocular Hypertension; Ophthalmic Solutions; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Single-Blind Method; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Timolol; Tonometry, Ocular; Travoprost; Treatment Outcome

To compare the 24-h intraocular pressure (IOP) control obtained with the bimatoprost-timolol fixed combination (BTFC) versus latanoprost in newly diagnosed, previously untreated exfoliation syndrome (XFS) or exfoliative glaucoma (XFG) patients with baseline morning IOP greater than 29 mm Hg.. One eye of 41 XFS/XFG patients who met inclusion criteria was included in this prospective, observer-masked, crossover, comparison protocol. All subjects underwent a 24-h untreated curve and were then randomised to either evening administered BTFC or latanoprost for 3 months and then switched to the opposite therapy. At the end of each treatment period, patients underwent a treated 24-h IOP assessment.. 37 patients completed the trial. At baseline, mean untreated 24-h IOP was 31.1 mm Hg. Mean 24-h IOP with BTFC was significantly lower than with latanoprost (18.9 vs 21.2 mm Hg; p<0.001). Furthermore, BTFC reduced IOP significantly more than latanoprost at every time point, for the mean peak and trough 24-h IOP (p<0.001). There was no difference, however, in mean 24-h IOP fluctuation between the two medications (3.8 with BTFC vs 4.2 with latanoprost; p=0.161). Both treatments were well tolerated and there was no statistically significant difference for any adverse event between them.. As first choice therapy in high-pressure, at-risk exfoliation patients, BTFC controlled mean 24-h IOP significantly better than latanoprost monotherapy.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amides; Antihypertensive Agents; Bimatoprost; Circadian Rhythm; Cloprostenol; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Exfoliation Syndrome; Female; Glaucoma; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Latanoprost; Male; Middle Aged; Ocular Hypertension; Prospective Studies; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic; Timolol; Tonometry, Ocular; Treatment Outcome; Visual Field Tests; Visual Fields

To compare 24 h intraocular pressure (IOP) control of morning and evening administered bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination (BTFC) and evening administered bimatoprost in exfoliative glaucoma (XFG).. One eye of 60 XFG patients was included in this prospective, observer-masked, crossover comparison. Following wash-out, all patients received bimatoprost monotherapy for 6 weeks. They were then randomised to morning, or evening, administered BTFC for 3 months and then switched to the opposite therapy.. At baseline, mean 24 h pressure was 29.0 mm Hg. Bimatoprost reduced the mean IOP by 8.1 mm Hg (27.8%, p<0.001). The evening administration of BTFC reduced 24 h IOP to a statistically lower level than morning administration (10.2 mm Hg (35.3%) vs 9.8 mm Hg (33.8%); p=0.005). Both dosing regimens reduced IOP significantly more than bimatoprost (p < or = 0.006, for all time points). A 24 h IOP reduction > or = 30% was seen in 43 patients (72%) with evening BTFC compared with 39 patients (65%) with morning BTFC (p=0.344) and only 24 patients (40%) with bimatoprost monotherapy (p<0.001 vs both BTFC regimens).. Both BTFC dosing regimens significantly reduce 24 h IOP in XFG compared with bimatoprost monotherapy. The evening dosing gives rise to statistically better 24 h IOP control and could be considered in these patients.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amides; Antihypertensive Agents; Bimatoprost; Circadian Rhythm; Cloprostenol; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Exfoliation Syndrome; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Male; Middle Aged; Single-Blind Method; Timolol; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate 24-h efficacy of travoprost/timolol fixed combination (TTFC) vslatanoprost/timolol fixed combination (LTFC) in exfoliative glaucoma (XFG).. A prospective, single-masked, crossover, active-controlled, randomized 24-h comparison.. After up to a 6-week medicine-free period, XFG patients were randomized to either TTFC or LTFC for 3 months, dosed each evening, and then changed to the opposite treatment for another 3 months. At the end of the washout, and both treatment periods, a 24-h intraocular pressure (IOP) curve was measured.. In total, 40 patients completed the study. The TTFC group showed a lower mean absolute 24-h IOP (18.7±2.6 vs 19.6±2.6 mm Hg, P<0.001), maximum IOP (20.5±2.6 vs 21.5±2.6 mm Hg, P<0.001) and 24-h IOP range (3.4±1.3 vs 4.1±1.6 mm Hg, P=0.01). At individual time points, TTFC showed reduced IOPs compared with LTFC, after a Bonferroni correction, at 1000, 1800, and 2200 hours (P≤0.04). No statistical differences existed at hours: 0600, 1400, and 0200 (P≥0.05) and for the minimum IOP (P=0.09).. This study suggests that evening-dosed TTFC may provide greater 24-h IOP reduction, primarily at the 1800 hours time point, compared with LTFC in XFG.

Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Cloprostenol; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exfoliation Syndrome; Female; Glaucoma; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Latanoprost; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic; Single-Blind Method; Time Factors; Timolol; Travoprost

To evaluate intraocular pressure (IOP) control over 24 hours using travoprost and timolol fixed combination (TTFC) administered in the morning or evening in primary open-angle and exfoliative glaucoma.. Patients were randomized to TTFC administered in either the morning or evening for 8 weeks. Previously treated patients underwent an untreated washout period of 4-6 weeks, after which baseline IOP was required to be > 25 mm Hg and < 38 mmHg (in two readings taken at 10.00 +/- 1 hours). During the treatment period, IOP was measured at 10.00, 14.00, 18.00, 22.00, 02.00 and 06.00 hours. Patients were then treated with the opposite dosing regimen for 8 weeks and IOP measurements were repeated.. In 32 subjects who completed the study, the untreated baseline IOP following washout was 27.7 +/- 3.5 mmHg. Both dosing regimens reduced IOP from baseline at each time-point and throughout the 24-hour diurnal curve (p < 0.0001). When treatments were compared directly, evening dosing (18.4 +/- 3.3 mmHg) provided a statistically significant lower 24-hour curve than morning dosing (19.2 +/- 3.5 mmHg; p = 0.001). Evening dosing also resulted in a lower 24-hour IOP fluctuation (3.8 +/- 1.6 mmHg) than morning dosing (5.1 +/- 1.6 mmHg; p = 0.0002) and lower peak IOP (p = 0.0003).. Both morning and evening administration of TTFC provide effective 24-hour IOP reduction, but evening dosing demonstrates better 24-hour pressure control.

Topics: Adult; Antihypertensive Agents; Circadian Rhythm; Cloprostenol; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Exfoliation Syndrome; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Timolol; Tonometry, Ocular; Travoprost; Visual Acuity

To compare the 24-h IOP reductions induced by latanoprost, travoprost, and bimatoprost in eyes with exfoliation syndrome (XFS) associated with ocular hypertension (OH).. This was a prospective, randomized, single masked, and parallel design study with 15 patients in each treatment group. After washout of any previous medications, each patient underwent a baseline 24-h IOP curve testing at 0600, 0900, 1200, 1500, 1800, 2100, and at 2400 (midnight) hours. Patients were then randomized to receive latanoprost, travoprost, or bimatoprost once a day for 3 months. The 24-h curve testing was repeated at first week, and first and third months.. Maximal and minimal IOP was recorded at 0600 and 1800-2100 hours. There was no significant difference among treatment groups at any time-point except for the first week. At the first week, the travoprost group had significantly lower IOP levels than the latanoprost and bimatoprost groups. All medicines significantly lowered 24-h IOP from baseline (P=0.001 for each). Although there was no significant difference in IOP reduction among groups at first week and first month, bimatoprost reduced the 24-h IOP (7.9+/-1.4) more than travoprost (6.6+/-0.5) at the end of the third month (P=0.003). The mean 24-h range of IOP was lowest with travoprost in all visits, and between-group differences was significant for travoprost vslatanoprost (P=0.007) and travoprost vsbimatoprost (P=0.001) at the third month.. Latanoprost, travoprost, and bimatoprost were effective in reducing the 24-h IOP in patients with XFS and OH, and more research is required with a larger study.

Topics: Amides; Antihypertensive Agents; Bimatoprost; Cloprostenol; Exfoliation Syndrome; Female; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Latanoprost; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Ocular Hypertension; Prospective Studies; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic; Single-Blind Method; Travoprost; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) control and safety of bimatoprost versus latanoprost in exfoliative glaucoma (XFG).. One eye of 129 consecutive patients with XFG (mean (SD) age 66.5 (8.3) years) was included in this prospective, observer-masked, three-centre, crossover comparison. After a 4-6 week medicine-free period patients were randomised to bimatoprost or latanoprost monotherapy for 3 months. Patients were then switched to the opposite treatment for another 3 months. At the end of the washout and the treatment periods diurnal IOP was measured at 0800, 1300, and 1800.. At baseline the IOP (mean (SD)) was 28.0 (4.0), 26.9 (3.6), and 25.9 (3.6) mm Hg, at the three time points, respectively. Both treatments significantly reduced mean diurnal IOP at month 3. Mean diurnal IOP was 26.9 (3.5) mm Hg at baseline, 17.6 (3.3) mm Hg with bimatoprost, and 18.6 (3.6) mm Hg with latanoprost (p<0.0001). Furthermore, lower IOP values were obtained with bimatoprost at all time points (17.9 (3.4), 17.3 (3.3), and 17.6 (3.5) mm Hg, respectively) compared with latanoprost (18.7 (3.6), 18.5 (3.6), and 18.6 (4.1) mm Hg, respectively). The corresponding mean differences (0.8, 1.1, and 1.0 mm Hg, respectively) were all significant (p<0.001 for each comparison). Significantly more patients with XFG obtained a target diurnal IOP <17 mm Hg with bimatoprost than with latanoprost, 55/123 (45%) v 34/123 (28%); (p = 0.001), and significantly fewer patients were non-responders with bimatoprost than with latanoprost (5 v 13, p = 0.021). More patients reported at least one adverse event with bimatoprost than with latanoprost (58 v 41 at 3 months; p = 0.0003).. This crossover study suggests that better diurnal IOP control is obtained with bimatoprost than with latanoprost in patients with XFG.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Amides; Antihypertensive Agents; Bimatoprost; Circadian Rhythm; Cloprostenol; Cross-Over Studies; Exfoliation Syndrome; Glaucoma; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Latanoprost; Lipids; Middle Aged; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic; Single-Blind Method

To evaluate 24-hour intraocular pressure (IOP) efficacy of latanoprost versus travoprost, each given every evening, in exfoliative glaucoma patients.. Prospective, observer-masked, crossover comparison.. Forty patients with exfoliation glaucoma.. Patients with a pressure of >24 mmHg were randomized to latanoprost or travoprost for an 8-week treatment period after a 6-week medicine-free period. Patients were then switched to the opposite treatment for the second period. At untreated baseline and at the end of each treatment period the IOP was measured at 6 am, 10 am, 2 pm, 6 pm, 10 pm, and 2 am.. Diurnal IOP.. The mean 24-hour IOP was 25.1+/-2.5 mmHg at baseline, 17.8+/-2.1 mmHg on latanoprost, and 17.3+/-2.2 mmHg on travoprost (P = 0.001). Individual time points were similar between treatments, except at 6 pm when travoprost provided lower IOP (16.7+/-2.6 vs 17.9+/-2.5 mmHg, P<0.001). Adverse events showed more conjunctival hyperemia with travoprost (n = 15) than latanoprost (n = 6; P = 0.03).. Latanoprost and travoprost both significantly reduce the 24-hour IOP from baseline in exfoliative glaucoma, but travoprost may demonstrate a greater hypotensive efficacy in the late afternoon.

Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Circadian Rhythm; Cloprostenol; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Exfoliation Syndrome; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Latanoprost; Male; Prospective Studies; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic; Travoprost; Treatment Outcome; Visual Acuity; Visual Fields

To evaluate the effect of bimatoprost 0.03% on intraocular pressure (IOP) after phacoemulsification in eyes with exfoliation syndrome.. This prospective, randomized, masked study comprised 90 eyes of 90 patients scheduled for phacoemulsification. The patients were divided into three groups (group 1 = without exfoliation, group 2 = with exfoliation syndrome, group 3 = exfoliation syndrome + bimatoprost). Immediately after phacoemulsification, one drop of bimatoprost was instilled in eyes in group 3. Baseline IOP was measured 1 day before surgery and routine follow-ups were performed at 6 hours, 20-24 hours and 1 week postoperatively.. Preoperative IOP was 15.0 +/- 2.7 mmHg in group 1, 15.6 +/- 3.2 mmHg in group 2 and 16.1 +/- 3.2 mmHg in group 3 (p = 0.372). Six hours postoperatively, there was a significant difference between the groups (p = 0.013): IOP in group 2 (22.4 +/- 7.3 mmHg) was higher than in group 1 (18.4 +/- 4.4 mmHg) (p = 0.018) and group 3 (18.9 +/- 4.9 mmHg) (p = 0.044). In all groups, IOP values at 6 hours postoperatively were higher than preoperative values (p < 0.001), but IOP values at 20-24 hours and 1 week after surgery were not significantly different from baseline values (p > 0.05). The change in IOP in group 2, from baseline to 6 hours postoperatively, was greater than the equivalent changes in group 1 (p = 0.048) and group 3 (p = 0.016).. Transient IOP increase and spikes were more common in eyes with exfoliation syndrome. Postoperative application of bimatoprost was effective in reducing IOP and preventing IOP spikes >/= 30 mmHg in eyes with exfoliation syndrome in the early postoperative period.

Topics: Aged; Amides; Antihypertensive Agents; Bimatoprost; Cloprostenol; Double-Blind Method; Exfoliation Syndrome; Female; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Lens Implantation, Intraocular; Lipids; Male; Ocular Hypertension; Ophthalmic Solutions; Phacoemulsification; Postoperative Care; Prospective Studies

To compare efficacies of adjunctive therapy with brimonidine 0.15% and adjunctive therapy with brinzolamide 1% in combination with travoprost 0.004%.. Three-month randomized, parallel-group, double-masked, multicenter clinical trial.. Patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, exfoliation glaucoma, or ocular hypertension with intraocular pressure (IOP) > 18 mmHg on monotherapy with travoprost (N = 163).. Patients were randomized to receive adjunctive therapy with twice-daily brimonidine (N = 79) or twice-daily brinzolamide (N = 84). Treatment efficacy was assessed after 1 and 3 months of combination therapy. Intraocular pressure was measured at 8 am, noon, and 4 pm at baseline (on travoprost monotherapy) and after 3 months of combination therapy. Mean diurnal IOP was defined as the average of the IOP measurements at these 3 time points. Adverse events were recorded at each visit.. Difference between treatment groups in mean diurnal IOP at month 3, adjusted for difference in baseline IOP, using analysis of covariance.. Mean diurnal IOPs (+/- standard error of the mean) at baseline were 21.7+/-0.33 mmHg in the brimonidine group and 21.1+/-0.29 mmHg in the brinzolamide group (P = 0.16). Mean diurnal IOPs at month 3 were 19.6+/-0.41 mmHg in the brimonidine group and 18.4+/-0.33 mm Hg in the brinzolamide group (P = 0.019). At month 3, mean diurnal IOPs, adjusted for difference in baseline IOP, were 19.3+/-0.27 in the brimonidine group and 18.6+/-0.25 in the brinzolamide group (P = 0.035).. The combination of travoprost and brinzolamide was statistically significantly more efficacious than the combination of travoprost and brimonidine in lowering IOP. The clinical significance of this difference is uncertain.

Topics: Adrenergic alpha-Agonists; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Brimonidine Tartrate; Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors; Circadian Rhythm; Cloprostenol; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exfoliation Syndrome; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Male; Middle Aged; Ocular Hypertension; Quinoxalines; Sulfonamides; Thiazines; Travoprost; Treatment Outcome

While topical ocular hypotensive agents cause secretion of endogenous prostaglandin (PG), systemic and topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents inhibit its production; thus, they may interfere with therapeutic efficacy. This study aimed to investigate the effect of add-on treatment with ketorolac on intra-ocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effects of three different PG analogues.. This study included 30 adult bilateral glaucoma patients who had been receiving PG analogues for primary open-angle glaucoma (n = 25) or pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (n = 5). Ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% and placebo drops were administered to the right and left eyes of the patients, respectively, 4 times a day for 1 week. IOP measurements were performed at baseline, within the first 4 h after application, on days 1, 3 and 7, and 1 and 7 days after discontinuation of the treatment.. Eyes receiving ketorolac had significantly lower IOP throughout the treatment period (p < 0.001). Patients who were on latanoprost, travoprost and bimatoprost did not differ with regard to the change in IOP (p = 0.780). After discontinuation, pressures became similar on day 1 (p = 0.796) and day 7 (p = 0.314).. In glaucoma patients, ketorolac significantly enhances the IOP-lowering effects of latanoprost, travoprost and bimatoprost.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amides; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antihypertensive Agents; Bimatoprost; Cloprostenol; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exfoliation Syndrome; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Ketorolac Tromethamine; Latanoprost; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Prostaglandins A, Synthetic; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic; Tonometry, Ocular; Travoprost

To investigate the intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering effect of bimatoprost (BIM) 0.03% and the potential additional effect of the BIM 0.03%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination (BTFC) in eyes with ocular hypertension, primary open-angle glaucoma, or exfoliation glaucoma.. Following an appropriate washout period that varied with previous medication, participants with ocular hypertension, primary open-angle glaucoma, or exfoliation glaucoma were treated with evening-dosed BIM for 5 weeks. They were then given evening-dosed BTFC for another 5 weeks. One randomly selected eye was evaluated. Goldmann applanation tonometry was performed by the same investigator at 8 a.m., 12 noon, 4 p.m., and 8 p.m. at baseline and at the end of each treatment period.. Thirty-three participants completed the study. Three patients discontinued because of local adverse effects during the BIM treatment period. The mean diurnal IOP (mean ± SD) at baseline, on BIM, and on BTFC were 24.8 ± 5.4, 17.3 ± 3.5, and 14.9 ± 3.1 mmHg, respectively (repeated measures analysis of variance, P < 0.001 for all pairwise comparisons). The individual time-point IOP values showed similar significant reductions. The percentage of IOP reduction from baseline was 30.2% for BIM and 39.9% for the BTFC. The mean ± SD diurnal fluctuation at baseline was 6.8 ± 3.2 mmHg, which decreased to 4.0 ± 3.1 and 2.9 ± 1.4 mmHg on BIM and BTFC, respectively (P < 0.05 for both treatments versus baseline).. Both BIM 0.03% and the BTFC were effective in lowering IOP in eyes with ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma. However, the fixed combination provided an additional statistically significant reduction in IOP compared with BIM 0.03%.

Topics: Aged; Amides; Antihypertensive Agents; Bimatoprost; Circadian Rhythm; Cloprostenol; Drug Combinations; Exfoliation Syndrome; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Male; Middle Aged; Ocular Hypertension; Ophthalmic Solutions; Single-Blind Method; Timolol; Treatment Outcome

To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction profiles of bimatoprost 0.03% administered every other night (QOD-HS) compared with every night (QHS) in patients with primary open angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma.. A retrospective chart review of 68 eyes of 45 consecutive patients who were switched from QHS to QOD-HS bimatoprost due to intolerable conjunctival hyperemia between May 2005 and May 2008. IOP in the morning (AM) and afternoon (PM) of the next day after administration (day 1) and the day after (day 2) on QOD-HS regimen was compared with IOP in the AM and PM when they were on QHS regimen, 4-6 weeks after switching to QOD-HS.. Mean IOPs on QHS bimatoprost were 15.9±3.4 mm Hg in the AM and 15.5±2.7 mm Hg in the PM, whereas mean IOPs on QOD-HS were 14±2 mm Hg (AM) and 14.2±2.5 mm Hg (PM) on day 1, and 14.7±2.6 mm Hg (AM) and 14.4±2.4 mm Hg (PM) on day 2 after administration. Differences between IOP fluctuation on QHS and QOD-HS days 1 and 2, respectively, were not significant (P=0.87 and 0.94).. Every other night dosing of bimatoprost was effective in controlling IOP in this select group of patients with primary open angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma who had troublesome side effects on bimatoprost 0.03% QHS regimen, and may be considered as an alternative to every day treatment.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amides; Antihypertensive Agents; Bimatoprost; Cloprostenol; Conjunctiva; Drug Administration Schedule; Exfoliation Syndrome; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Hyperemia; Intraocular Pressure; Male; Middle Aged; Ophthalmic Solutions; Retrospective Studies

Topics: Amides; Antihypertensive Agents; Bimatoprost; Circadian Rhythm; Cloprostenol; Cornea; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exfoliation Syndrome; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Latanoprost; Ocular Hypertension; Ophthalmic Solutions; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Single-Blind Method; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Timolol; Tonometry, Ocular; Travoprost; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Amides; Antihypertensive Agents; Bimatoprost; Circadian Rhythm; Cloprostenol; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exfoliation Syndrome; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Latanoprost; Ocular Hypertension; Ophthalmic Solutions; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Single-Blind Method; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Timolol; Tonometry, Ocular; Travoprost; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Aged; Cloprostenol; Exfoliation Syndrome; Female; Glaucoma; Humans; Ophthalmic Solutions; Travoprost; Uveitis, Anterior

To describe a previously unreported case of anterior granulomatous uveitis in a patient using bimatoprost.. A 72-year-old woman with a long-standing history of anisometropic amblyopia and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma in the right eye started therapy with bimatoprost 0.03% once a day in the right eye. She had no previous history of ocular inflammation or ocular surgery. Her medical history was negative for systemic diseases associated with ocular inflammation.. After one week, the patient developed severe conjunctival injection, cells and flare, and numerous 'mutton fat' keratic precipitates in the right eye. Examination of the left eye revealed no evidence of inflammation. Bimatoprost was discontinued; no topical steroid therapy was started. Systemic investigations were normal. The inflammation resolved over two weeks, solely with the discontinuation of bimatoprost.. Bimatoprost is a synthetic prostamide, chemically related to prostamide F. Prostamides are naturally occurring substances, biosynthesized from anandamide in a pathway that includes COX2. Even though anandamide has proven suggestive potential pro-inflammatory effects, the mechanism of induction of inflammation by bimatoprost remains uncertain and speculative. In our report, the onset of acute uveitis in a patient using bimatoprost, after a long-term and well-tolerated treatment with a prostaglandin analog, suggests a distinct potential pro-inflammatory action of prostamides. This can indirectly support the concept that the target receptor of bimatoprost is different, and that the mechanism of action of prostamides is pharmacologically unique.

Topics: Aged; Amides; Antihypertensive Agents; Bimatoprost; Cloprostenol; Exfoliation Syndrome; Female; Glaucoma; Granuloma; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Lipids; Uveitis, Anterior