citalopram has been researched along with Refractory Depression in 32 studies
Citalopram: A furancarbonitrile that is one of the serotonin uptake inhibitors used as an antidepressant. The drug is also effective in reducing ethanol uptake in alcoholics and is used in depressed patients who also suffer from TARDIVE DYSKINESIA in preference to tricyclic antidepressants, which aggravate dyskinesia.
citalopram : A racemate comprising equimolar amounts of (R)-citalopram and its enantiomer, escitalopram. It is used as an antidepressant, although only escitalopram is active.
1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dihydro-2-benzofuran-5-carbonitrile : A nitrile that is 1,3-dihydro-2-benzofuran-5-carbonitrile in which one of the hydrogens at position 1 is replaced by a p-fluorophenyl group, while the other is replaced by a 3-(dimethylamino)propyl group.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"The aim of this open trial was to assess the antidepressant/anxiolytic effects of oxytocin used as an adjunct to antidepressant in treatment-resistant depression." | 9.20 | Additional intranasal oxytocin to escitalopram improves depressive symptoms in resistant depression: an open trial. ( Ansseau, M; Geenen, V; Hansenne, M; Legros, JJ; Scantamburlo, G, 2015) |
"The aim of this open trial was to assess the antidepressant/anxiolytic effects of oxytocin used as an adjunct to antidepressant in treatment-resistant depression." | 5.20 | Additional intranasal oxytocin to escitalopram improves depressive symptoms in resistant depression: an open trial. ( Ansseau, M; Geenen, V; Hansenne, M; Legros, JJ; Scantamburlo, G, 2015) |
"A recent review proposed four criteria for an animal model of treatment-resistant depression (TRD): a phenotypic resemblance to a risk factor for depression; enhanced response to stress; nonresponse to antidepressant drugs and response to treatments effective in TRD, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the prefrontal cortex or ketamine." | 3.91 | Validation of chronic mild stress in the Wistar-Kyoto rat as an animal model of treatment-resistant depression. ( Gruca, P; Lason, M; Litwa, E; Niemczyk, M; Papp, M; Tota-Glowczyk, K; Willner, P, 2019) |
"Adults with major depressive disorder frequently do not achieve remission with an initial treatment." | 2.90 | Benefits of Sequentially Adding Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy or Antidepressant Medication for Adults With Nonremitting Depression. ( Cole, SP; Craighead, WE; Dunlop, BW; Kinkead, B; LoParo, D; Mayberg, HS; Mletzko-Crowe, T; Nemeroff, CB, 2019) |
" The five most common adverse events (dissociation, nausea, vertigo, dysgeusia, and dizziness) all were observed more frequently in the esketamine plus antidepressant arm than in the antidepressant plus placebo arm; 7% and 0." | 2.90 | Efficacy and Safety of Flexibly Dosed Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a Newly Initiated Oral Antidepressant in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Double-Blind Active-Controlled Study. ( Bajbouj, M; Cooper, K; Daly, EJ; Drevets, WC; Hough, D; Lane, R; Lim, P; Manji, H; Mazzucco, C; Molero, P; Popova, V; Shelton, RC; Singh, JB; Thase, ME; Trivedi, M; Vieta, E, 2019) |
" The most common (>20%) adverse events reported for esketamine/antidepressant were nausea, dissociation, dizziness, vertigo, and headache." | 2.90 | Efficacy and Safety of Fixed-Dose Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a New Oral Antidepressant in Treatment-Resistant Depression: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Study (TRANSFORM-1). ( Ameele, HVD; Blier, P; Daly, EJ; Drevets, WC; Fava, M; Fedgchin, M; Gaillard, R; Hough, D; Lane, R; Liebowitz, M; Lim, P; Manji, H; Melkote, R; Preskorn, S; Ravindran, A; Singh, JB; Trivedi, M; Vitagliano, D, 2019) |
"Studies of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) have consistently reported reduced hippocampal volumes; however, the exact pattern of these volume changes in specific anatomical subfields and their functional significance is unclear." | 2.87 | Increased hippocampal tail volume predicts depression status and remission to anti-depressant medications in major depression. ( Broadhouse, K; Gordon, E; Grieve, SM; Koslow, S; Maller, JJ; Rush, AJ, 2018) |
"Major depressive disorder is a debilitating illness, which is most commonly treated with antidepressant drugs." | 2.84 | Investigation of miR-1202, miR-135a, and miR-16 in Major Depressive Disorder and Antidepressant Response. ( Berlim, M; Chachamovich, E; Fiori, LM; Foster, J; Jollant, F; Kennedy, SH; Lopez, JP; Richard-Devantoy, S; Rotzinger, S; Turecki, G, 2017) |
"220 patients with major depressive disorder who were non-responders to a previous antidepressant were treated with venlafaxine for 4-6 weeks and in case of non-response with escitalopram for 4-6 weeks." | 2.84 | Neuroplasticity and second messenger pathways in antidepressant efficacy: pharmacogenetic results from a prospective trial investigating treatment resistance. ( Albani, D; Calabrò, M; Calati, R; Crisafulli, C; Fabbri, C; Forloni, G; Juven-Wetzler, A; Kasper, S; Martines, R; Mendlewicz, J; Montgomery, S; Serretti, A; Souery, D; Zohar, J, 2017) |
"Bupropion is an antidepressant agent usually reserved as an augmentation strategy for treatment-resistant depression." | 1.42 | Hyponatraemia and confusion in a 70-year-old female when bupropion was added to dothiepin and escitalopram. ( Balasubramanian, T; Ferraro, A; Wiggins, A, 2015) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 0 (0.00) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 27 (84.38) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 5 (15.63) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Li, Q | 1 |
Zhao, W | 1 |
Liu, S | 1 |
Zhao, Y | 1 |
Pan, W | 1 |
Wang, X | 1 |
Liu, Z | 1 |
Xu, Y | 1 |
Amasi-Hartoonian, N | 1 |
Pariante, CM | 1 |
Cattaneo, A | 1 |
Sforzini, L | 1 |
Halaris, A | 2 |
Cantos, A | 1 |
Johnson, K | 1 |
Hakimi, M | 1 |
Sinacore, J | 1 |
Marchetti, L | 1 |
Lauria, M | 1 |
Caberlotto, L | 1 |
Musazzi, L | 1 |
Popoli, M | 1 |
Mathé, AA | 1 |
Domenici, E | 1 |
Carboni, L | 1 |
Murata, S | 1 |
Murphy, M | 1 |
Hoppensteadt, D | 1 |
Fareed, J | 1 |
Welborn, A | 1 |
Fiori, LM | 1 |
Lopez, JP | 1 |
Richard-Devantoy, S | 1 |
Berlim, M | 1 |
Chachamovich, E | 1 |
Jollant, F | 1 |
Foster, J | 1 |
Rotzinger, S | 1 |
Kennedy, SH | 1 |
Turecki, G | 1 |
Maller, JJ | 1 |
Broadhouse, K | 1 |
Rush, AJ | 2 |
Gordon, E | 2 |
Koslow, S | 1 |
Grieve, SM | 2 |
Papp, M | 2 |
Gruca, P | 2 |
Lason, M | 2 |
Tota-Glowczyk, K | 2 |
Niemczyk, M | 2 |
Litwa, E | 2 |
Willner, P | 2 |
Dunlop, BW | 1 |
LoParo, D | 1 |
Kinkead, B | 1 |
Mletzko-Crowe, T | 1 |
Cole, SP | 1 |
Nemeroff, CB | 1 |
Mayberg, HS | 1 |
Craighead, WE | 1 |
Strawn, JR | 1 |
Mills, JA | 1 |
Croarkin, PE | 1 |
Olgiati, P | 1 |
Serretti, A | 4 |
Souery, D | 4 |
Kasper, S | 4 |
Kraus, C | 1 |
Montgomery, S | 4 |
Zohar, J | 4 |
Mendlewicz, J | 4 |
Popova, V | 1 |
Daly, EJ | 2 |
Trivedi, M | 2 |
Cooper, K | 1 |
Lane, R | 2 |
Lim, P | 2 |
Mazzucco, C | 1 |
Hough, D | 2 |
Thase, ME | 1 |
Shelton, RC | 1 |
Molero, P | 1 |
Vieta, E | 1 |
Bajbouj, M | 1 |
Manji, H | 2 |
Drevets, WC | 3 |
Singh, JB | 2 |
Fedgchin, M | 1 |
Melkote, R | 1 |
Vitagliano, D | 1 |
Blier, P | 1 |
Fava, M | 1 |
Liebowitz, M | 1 |
Ravindran, A | 1 |
Gaillard, R | 1 |
Ameele, HVD | 1 |
Preskorn, S | 1 |
Hilton, RC | 1 |
Rengasamy, M | 2 |
Mansoor, B | 2 |
He, J | 2 |
Mayes, T | 1 |
Emslie, GJ | 2 |
Porta, G | 2 |
Clarke, GN | 1 |
Wagner, KD | 2 |
Birmaher, B | 2 |
Keller, MB | 1 |
Ryan, N | 2 |
Shamseddeen, W | 2 |
Asarnow, JR | 1 |
Brent, DA | 1 |
Hilton, R | 1 |
Spirito, A | 1 |
Mayes, TL | 1 |
Clarke, G | 1 |
Brent, D | 1 |
Vijaya Kumar, K | 1 |
Rudra, A | 1 |
Sreedhara, MV | 1 |
Siva Subramani, T | 1 |
Prasad, DS | 1 |
Das, ML | 1 |
Murugesan, S | 1 |
Yadav, R | 1 |
Trivedi, RK | 1 |
Louis, JV | 1 |
Li, YW | 1 |
Bristow, LJ | 1 |
Naidu, PS | 1 |
Vikramadithyan, RK | 1 |
Scantamburlo, G | 1 |
Hansenne, M | 1 |
Geenen, V | 1 |
Legros, JJ | 1 |
Ansseau, M | 1 |
Bennabi, D | 1 |
Nicolier, M | 1 |
Monnin, J | 1 |
Tio, G | 1 |
Pazart, L | 1 |
Vandel, P | 1 |
Haffen, E | 1 |
Calati, R | 3 |
Papageorgiou, K | 1 |
Juven-Wetzler, A | 2 |
Gailledreau, J | 1 |
Modavi, D | 1 |
Sentissi, O | 1 |
Pitchot, W | 1 |
Papadimitriou, GN | 1 |
Dikeos, D | 1 |
Möller, HJ | 1 |
Demyttenaere, K | 1 |
Olausson, B | 1 |
Szamosi, J | 1 |
Wilson, E | 1 |
Hosford, D | 1 |
Dunbar, G | 1 |
Tummala, R | 1 |
Eriksson, H | 1 |
Zhang, Y | 1 |
Wang, Y | 1 |
Wang, L | 1 |
Bai, M | 1 |
Zhang, X | 1 |
Zhu, X | 1 |
Munari, L | 1 |
Provensi, G | 1 |
Passani, MB | 1 |
Galeotti, N | 1 |
Cassano, T | 1 |
Benetti, F | 1 |
Corradetti, R | 1 |
Blandina, P | 1 |
Wiggins, A | 1 |
Balasubramanian, T | 1 |
Ferraro, A | 1 |
Balestri, M | 1 |
Kautzky, A | 1 |
Tadić, A | 1 |
Wachtlin, D | 1 |
Berger, M | 1 |
Braus, DF | 1 |
van Calker, D | 1 |
Dahmen, N | 1 |
Dreimüller, N | 1 |
Engel, A | 1 |
Gorbulev, S | 1 |
Helmreich, I | 1 |
Kaiser, AK | 1 |
Kronfeld, K | 1 |
Schlicht, KF | 1 |
Tüscher, O | 1 |
Wagner, S | 1 |
Hiemke, C | 1 |
Lieb, K | 1 |
Korgaonkar, MS | 1 |
Williams, LM | 1 |
Li, QS | 1 |
Tian, C | 1 |
Seabrook, GR | 1 |
Narayan, VA | 1 |
Fabbri, C | 1 |
Crisafulli, C | 1 |
Albani, D | 1 |
Forloni, G | 1 |
Calabrò, M | 1 |
Martines, R | 1 |
Breitfeld, J | 1 |
Scholl, C | 1 |
Steffens, M | 1 |
Laje, G | 1 |
Stingl, JC | 1 |
Gaynes, BN | 1 |
Dusetzina, SB | 1 |
Ellis, AR | 1 |
Hansen, RA | 1 |
Farley, JF | 1 |
Miller, WC | 1 |
Stürmer, T | 1 |
Romera, I | 1 |
Pérez, V | 1 |
Menchón, JM | 1 |
Schacht, A | 1 |
Papen, R | 1 |
Neuhauser, D | 1 |
Abbar, M | 1 |
Svanborg, P | 1 |
Gilaberte, I | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cyclooxygenase-2-Inhibitor Combination Treatment for Bipolar Depression: Role of Inflammation and Kynurenine Pathway Biomarkers[NCT01479829] | Phase 4 | 88 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2011-03-31 | Completed | ||
International Study to Predict Optimised Treatment - in Depression[NCT00693849] | Phase 4 | 2,688 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2008-09-30 | Active, not recruiting | ||
Effect of S-ketamine on Depressed Patients Undergoing Electroconvulsive Therapy-a Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Clinical Study[NCT04399070] | 150 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2020-08-01 | Not yet recruiting | |||
A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Flexible Doses of Intranasal Esketamine Plus an Oral Antidepressant in Adult Subjects With Treatment-resistant Depression[NCT02418585] | Phase 3 | 236 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-08-07 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Fixed Doses of Intranasal Esketamine Plus an Oral Antidepressant in Adult Subjects With Treatment-resistant Depression[NCT02417064] | Phase 3 | 346 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-08-10 | Completed | ||
Treatment of SSRI-Resistant Depression in Adolescents (TORDIA)[NCT00018902] | Phase 2/Phase 3 | 334 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2001-01-31 | Completed | ||
Pilot Study of Feasibility of the Effect of Treatment With tDCS in Patients Suffering From Resistant Depression[NCT01428804] | Phase 2 | 24 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2011-06-30 | Completed | ||
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Parallel Group Placebo-Controlled Phase III, Efficacy and Safety Study of 3 Fixed Dose Groups of TC-5214 (S-mecamylamine) as an Adjunct to an Antidepressants in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Who Exhibit an[NCT01197508] | Phase 3 | 696 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-09-30 | Completed | ||
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Parallel Group Placebo-Controlled Phase III,Efficacy and Safety Study of 3 Fixed Dose Groups of TC-5214 (S-mecamylamine) as an Adjunct to an Antidepressant in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Who Exhibit an I[NCT01153347] | Phase 3 | 2,409 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-06-30 | Completed | ||
Comparison of Two Different Treatment Strategies in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Not Exhibiting Improvement on Escitalopram Treatment: Early vs. Delayed Intervention Strategy[NCT00810069] | Phase 4 | 840 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-11-30 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
"CGI-S provides measure of severity of participant's illness including participant's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior and impact of symptoms on ability to function. CGI-S evaluates severity of psychopathology on scale of 0 to 7. Considering total clinical experience, participant is assessed on severity of mental illness according to: 0=not assessed; 1=normal (not at all ill); 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among most extremely ill patients. CGI-S permits global evaluation of participant's condition at given time. The last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as End Point for that phase." (NCT02418585)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Endpoint (Double-blind Induction Phase [Day 28])
Intervention | Units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine (Esk) Plus Oral Antidepressant (AD) | -2.0 |
Intranasal Placebo Plus Oral AD | -2.0 |
EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part instrument for use as a measure of health outcome, designed for self-completion by respondents. It consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ VAS. The EQ VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his or her overall health status at the time of completion, on a scale of 0 (the worst health you can imagine) to 100 (the best health you can imagine). (NCT02418585)
Timeframe: Baseline up to End of Double-blind Induction Phase (Day 28)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine (Esk) Plus Oral Antidepressant (AD) | 29.1 |
Intranasal Placebo Plus Oral AD | 20.9 |
"EQ-5D-5L consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). Participant selects answer for each of 5 dimensions considering response that best matches his/her health today. Responses were used to generate a Health Status Index (HSI). Health Status Index range is -0.148 - 0.949, is anchored at 0 (dead) and 1 (full health). EQ VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his/her overall health status at time of completion, on a scale of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine). Sum score ranges from 0 to 100 where, sum score = (sum of the scores from the 5 dimensions minus 5) *5. Higher score indicates worst health state." (NCT02418585)
Timeframe: Baseline up to End of Double-blind Induction Phase (Day 28)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine (Esk) Plus Oral Antidepressant (AD) | -23.2 |
Intranasal Placebo Plus Oral AD | -17.1 |
"European Quality of Life Group-5 Dimension-5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) is a 2-part instrument for use as a measure of health outcome, designed for self-completion by respondents. It consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ VAS. EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). Participant selects answer for each of 5 dimensions considering response that best matches his/her health today. Responses were used to generate a Health Status Index (HSI). Health Status Index range is -0.148 - 0.949, is anchored at 0 (dead) and 1 (full health)." (NCT02418585)
Timeframe: Baseline up to End of Double-blind Induction Phase (Day 28)
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine (Esk) Plus Oral Antidepressant (AD) | 0.288 |
Intranasal Placebo Plus Oral AD | 0.231 |
"GAD-7 is a brief and validated 7-item self-report assessment of overall anxiety. Participants respond to each item using a 4-point scale with response categories of 0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, and 3=nearly every day. Item responses are summed to yield a total score with a range of 0 to 21, where higher scores indicate more anxiety. The recall period is 2 weeks. The severity of the GAD-7 is categorized as follows: None (0-4), Mild (5-9), Moderate (10-14) and Severe (15 -21). The last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as End Point for that phase." (NCT02418585)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Endpoint (Double-blind Induction Phase [Day 28])
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine (Esk) Plus Oral Antidepressant (AD) | -7.9 |
Intranasal Placebo Plus Oral AD | -6.8 |
MADRS is clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity, and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment. Scale consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), each of which is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent more severe condition. (NCT02418585)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 28 of Double-blind Induction Phase
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine (Esk) Plus Oral Antidepressant (AD) | -21.4 |
Intranasal Placebo Plus Oral AD | -17.0 |
"MADRS is clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity, and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment. Scale consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), each of which is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent more severe condition. The last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as End Point for that phase." (NCT02418585)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Endpoint (Double-blind Induction Phase [Day 28])
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine (Esk) Plus Oral Antidepressant (AD) | -19.6 |
Intranasal Placebo Plus Oral AD | -16.3 |
PHQ-9 is 9-item, self-report scale assessing depressive symptoms. Each item is rated on 4-point scale (0=Not at all, 1=Several Days, 2=More than half days, 3=Nearly every day. Scale scores each of 9 symptom domains of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder criteria and it has been used both as screening tool and measure of response to treatment for depression. The participant's item responses are summed to provide a total score (range of 0 to 27) with higher scores indicating greater severity of depressive symptoms. Severity of PHQ-9 categorized as follows: None-minimal (0-4), Mild (5-9), Moderate (10-14), Moderately Severe (15-19), Severe (20-27). (NCT02418585)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 28 of Double-blind Induction phase
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine (Esk) Plus Oral Antidepressant (AD) | -13.0 |
Intranasal Placebo Plus Oral AD | -10.2 |
"PHQ-9 is 9-item, self-report scale assessing depressive symptoms. Each item is rated on 4-point scale (0=Not at all, 1=Several Days, 2=More than half days, 3=Nearly every day). Scale scores each of 9 symptom domains of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder criteria and it has been used both as screening tool and measure of response to treatment for depression. The participant's item responses are summed to provide a total score (range of 0 to 27) with higher scores indicating greater severity of depressive symptoms. Severity of PHQ-9 categorized as follows: None-minimal (0-4), Mild (5-9), Moderate (10-14), Moderately Severe (15-19), Severe (20-27). The last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as End Point for that phase." (NCT02418585)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Endpoint (Double-blind Induction Phase [Day 28])
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine (Esk) Plus Oral Antidepressant (AD) | -12.2 |
Intranasal Placebo Plus Oral AD | -10.1 |
The SDS is a participant-reported outcome measure and 5 item questionnaire used for assessment of functional impairment and associated disability. First three items assess disruption of 1 work/school, 2 social life, 3 family life/home responsibilities using a 0(no impairment)-10 (most severe impairment). Score for first 3 items are summed to create total score of 0-30 where higher score indicates greater impairment and a negative change in score indicates improvement. It also has one item on days lost from school or work and one item on days when under productive. (NCT02418585)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 28 of Double-blind Induction phase
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine (Esk) Plus Oral Antidepressant (AD) | -13.6 |
Intranasal Placebo Plus Oral AD | -9.4 |
"The SDS is a participant-reported outcome measure and 5 item questionnaire used for assessment of functional impairment and associated disability. First three items assess disruption of 1 work/school, 2 social life, 3 family life/home responsibilities using a 0(no impairment)-10 (most severe impairment). Score for first 3 items are summed to create total score of 0-30 where higher score indicates greater impairment and a negative change in score indicates improvement. It also has one item on days lost from school or work and one item on days when under productive. The last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as End Point for that phase." (NCT02418585)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Endpoint (Double-blind Induction Phase [Day 28])
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine (Esk) Plus Oral Antidepressant (AD) | -12.5 |
Intranasal Placebo Plus Oral AD | -9.3 |
"Remission was defined as participants who had a MADRS total score of less than or equal to (=<) 12. MADRS is clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity, and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment. Scale consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), each of which is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent more severe condition. The last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as End Point for that phase." (NCT02418585)
Timeframe: At Endpoint (Double-blind Induction Phase [Day 28])
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine (Esk) Plus Oral Antidepressant (AD) | 48.2 |
Intranasal Placebo Plus Oral AD | 30.3 |
Remission defined as SDS total score <= 6 and individual item scores each <= 2. SDS is a participant reported outcome measure and is a 5-item questionnaire which has been widely used and accepted for assessment of functional impairment and associated disability. The first three items assess disruption of (1) work/school, (2) social life, and (3) family life/home responsibilities using a 0-10 rating scale. The score for the first three items were summed to create a total score of 0-30 where a higher score indicates greater impairment. It also has one item on days lost from school or work and one item on days when under productive. (NCT02418585)
Timeframe: At Day 28 (End of Double-blind Induction Phase)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine (Esk) Plus Oral Antidepressant (AD) | 39.5 |
Intranasal Placebo Plus Oral AD | 20.9 |
Response defined as SDS total score <= 12 and individual item scores each <= 4. SDS is a participant-reported outcome measure and 5 item questionnaire used for assessment of functional impairment and associated disability. First three items assess disruption of 1 work/school, 2 social life, 3 family life/home responsibilities using a 0(no impairment)-10 (most severe impairment). Score for first 3 items are summed to create total score of 0-30 where higher score indicates greater impairment and a negative change in score indicates improvement. It also has one item on days lost from school or work and one item on days when under productive. (NCT02418585)
Timeframe: At Day 28 [end of Double-blind Induction Phase]
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine (Esk) Plus Oral Antidepressant (AD) | 57.0 |
Intranasal Placebo Plus Oral AD | 39.5 |
"MADRS is clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity, and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment. Scale consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), each of which is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent more severe condition. The percentage of participants with greater than or equal to (>=) 50 % reduction from baseline in MADRS total score was reported. The last post baseline observation during the phase was carried forward as End Point for that phase." (NCT02418585)
Timeframe: At Endpoint (Double-blind Induction Phase [Day 28])
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine (Esk) Plus Oral Antidepressant (AD) | 63.4 |
Intranasal Placebo Plus Oral AD | 49.5 |
A participant was defined as having a clinical response if there is at least 50 percent (%) improvement from baseline in the MADRS total score with onset by Day 2 and Day 8 that was maintained to Day 28. MADRS is clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity, and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment. Scale consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), each of which is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent more severe condition. Participants who did not meet such criterion or discontinue during the study before Day 28 for any reason were considered as non-responders. (NCT02418585)
Timeframe: Day 2 up to Day 28 and Day 8 up to Day 28
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Onset of Clinical response on Day 2 | Onset of Clinical response on Day 8 | |
Intranasal Esketamine (Esk) Plus Oral Antidepressant (AD) | 7.9 | 10.5 |
Intranasal Placebo Plus Oral AD | 4.6 | 6.4 |
"CGI-S provides measure of severity of participant's illness including participant's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior and impact of symptoms on ability to function. CGI-S evaluates severity of psychopathology on scale of 0 to 7. Considering total clinical experience, participant is assessed on severity of mental illness according to: 0=not assessed; 1=normal (not at all ill); 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among most extremely ill patients (a decrease in score indicates improvement). Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the double-blind induction phase was carried forward as End Point for that phase." (NCT02417064)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Double-blind Endpoint (Day 28)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine 56 mg Plus Oral Antidepressant | -2.0 |
Intranasal Esketamine 84 mg Plus Oral AD | -2.0 |
Oral AD Plus Intranasal Placebo | -1.0 |
EQ-5D-5L measures health outcome self-completed by respondents. It consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS). EQ-VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his/her overall health status at time of completion, on scale of 0 (the worst health you can imagine) to 100 (the best health you can imagine). (NCT02417064)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of Double-blind induction phase (Day 28)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine 56 mg Plus Oral Antidepressant | 20.9 |
Intranasal Esketamine 84 mg Plus Oral AD | 19.1 |
Oral AD Plus Intranasal Placebo | 14.9 |
EQ-5D-5L measures health outcome self-completed by respondents. It consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS). The descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each has 5 levels (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). The responses are used to generate Health Status Index (HSI). HSI range is -0.148 to 0.949, is anchored at 0 (dead) and 1 (full health). (NCT02417064)
Timeframe: Baseline up to End of Double-blind Induction Phase (Day 28)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine 56 mg Plus Oral Antidepressant | 0.224 |
Intranasal Esketamine 84 mg Plus Oral AD | 0.243 |
Oral AD Plus Intranasal Placebo | 0.181 |
EQ-5D-5L measures health outcome self-completed by respondents. It consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS). The descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each has 5 levels (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). The responses are used to generate Health Status Index (HSI). HSI range is -0.148 to 0.949, is anchored at 0 (dead) and 1 (full health). EQ-VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his/her overall health status at time of completion, on scale of 0 (the worst health you can imagine) to 100 (the best health you can imagine). Sum score ranges from 0 to 100 where, sum score = (sum of the scores from the 5 dimensions minus 5) *5. Higher score indicates worst health state. (NCT02417064)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of Double-blind Induction phase (Day 28)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine 56 mg Plus Oral Antidepressant | -19.0 |
Intranasal Esketamine 84 mg Plus Oral AD | -19.4 |
Oral AD Plus Intranasal Placebo | -14.6 |
"GAD-7 is a brief and validated 7-item self-reported assessment of overall anxiety. Participants responded to each item using a 4 point scale with response categories of 0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, and 3=nearly every day. Item responses are summed to yield a total score with a range of 0 to 21, where higher scores indicate more anxiety. The recall period is 2 weeks. The severity of the GAD-7 is categorized as follows: None (0-4), Mild (5-9), Moderate (10-14) and Severe (15-21). Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the double-blind induction phase was carried forward as End Point for that phase." (NCT02417064)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Double-blind Endpoint (Day 28)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine 56 mg Plus Oral Antidepressant | -7.4 |
Intranasal Esketamine 84 mg Plus Oral AD | -7.7 |
Oral AD Plus Intranasal Placebo | -6.0 |
MADRS is clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity, and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment. Scale consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), each of which is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent more severe condition. (NCT02417064)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 28 of Double-blind Induction Phase
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine 56 mg Plus Oral Antidepressant | -19.0 |
Intranasal Esketamine 84 mg Plus Oral AD | -18.8 |
Oral AD Plus Intranasal Placebo | -14.8 |
"MADRS is clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity, and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment. Scale consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), each of which is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent more severe condition. Missing data was imputed using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method and last post baseline observation during double-blind induction phase was carried forward as End Point for that phase." (NCT02417064)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Double-blind Endpoint (Day 28)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine 56 mg Plus Oral Antidepressant | -18.3 |
Intranasal Esketamine 84 mg Plus Oral AD | -17.4 |
Oral AD Plus Intranasal Placebo | -14.3 |
PHQ-9 is 9-item, self-reported scale assessing 9 symptom domains of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder criteria. Each item is rated on 4-point scale (0 = Not at all, 1 = Several Days, 2 = More than half days, 3 = Nearly every day). The scores are summed for a total score ranging from 0-27. Higher score indicates greater severity of depression. Severity of PHQ-9 categorized as follows: None-minimal (0-4), Mild (5-9), Moderate (10-14), Moderately Severe (15-19), Severe (20-27). The recall period is 2 weeks. (NCT02417064)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 28 of Double-blind Induction phase
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine 56 mg Plus Oral Antidepressant | -11.0 |
Intranasal Esketamine 84 mg Plus Oral AD | -11.7 |
Oral AD Plus Intranasal Placebo | -9.1 |
"PHQ-9 is 9-item, self-reported scale assessing 9 symptom domains of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder criteria. Each item is rated on 4-point scale (0 = Not at all, 1 = Several Days, 2 = More than half days, 3 = Nearly every day). The scores are summed for a total score ranging from 0-27. Higher score indicates greater severity of depression. Severity of PHQ-9 categorized as follows: None-minimal (0-4), Mild (5-9), Moderate (10-14), Moderately Severe (15-19), Severe (20-27). The recall period is 2 weeks. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the double-blind induction phase was carried forward as End Point for that phase." (NCT02417064)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Double-blind Endpoint (Day 28)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine 56 mg Plus Oral Antidepressant | -10.9 |
Intranasal Esketamine 84 mg Plus Oral AD | -10.9 |
Oral AD Plus Intranasal Placebo | -8.9 |
The SDS is a participant-reported outcome measure and 5 item questionnaire used for assessment of functional impairment and associated disability. The first 3 items assess disruption of 1) work/school, 2) social life, and 3) family life/home responsibilities using 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely) rating scale. Score for first 3 items are summed to create total score of 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired), where higher score indicates greater impairment. (NCT02417064)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 28 of Double-blind Induction phase
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine 56 mg Plus Oral Antidepressant | -11.0 |
Intranasal Esketamine 84 mg Plus Oral AD | -11.1 |
Oral AD Plus Intranasal Placebo | -8.4 |
"The SDS is a participant-reported outcome measure and 5 item questionnaire used for assessment of functional impairment and associated disability. The first 3 items assess disruption of 1) work/school, 2) social life, and 3) family life/home responsibilities using 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely) rating scale. Score for first 3 items are summed to create total score of 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired) where higher score indicates greater impairment. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the double-blind induction phase was carried forward as End Point for that phase." (NCT02417064)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Double-blind Endpoint (Day 28)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine 56 mg Plus Oral Antidepressant | -10.7 |
Intranasal Esketamine 84 mg Plus Oral AD | -10.2 |
Oral AD Plus Intranasal Placebo | -8.1 |
Participants who had a MADRS total score of less than or equal to (<=) 12 were considered as remitters. MADRS is clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity, and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment. Scale consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), each of which is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent more severe condition. (NCT02417064)
Timeframe: At Day 28 of Double-blind Induction Phase
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine 56 mg Plus Oral Antidepressant | 36 |
Intranasal Esketamine 84 mg Plus Oral AD | 38.8 |
Oral AD Plus Intranasal Placebo | 30.6 |
"Participants who had a MADRS total score of less than or equal to (<=) 12 were considered as remitters. MADRS is clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity, and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment. Scale consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), each of which is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent more severe condition. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the double-blind induction phase was carried forward as End Point for that phase." (NCT02417064)
Timeframe: At Day 28 (Double-blind Endpoint)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine 56 mg Plus Oral Antidepressant | 34.8 |
Intranasal Esketamine 84 mg Plus Oral AD | 35.4 |
Oral AD Plus Intranasal Placebo | 29.2 |
A participant was defined as a responder (yes=1 and no=0) at a given time point if the percent reduction from baseline in MADRS total score is at least 50 percent (%). The percentage of participants who achieved at least 50% reduction from baseline were reported. MADRS is clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity, and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment. Scale consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), each of which is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent more severe condition. (NCT02417064)
Timeframe: At Day 28 of Double-blind Induction phase
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine 56 mg Plus Oral Antidepressant | 54.1 |
Intranasal Esketamine 84 mg Plus Oral AD | 53.1 |
Oral AD Plus Intranasal Placebo | 38.9 |
"A participant was defined as a responder (yes=1 and no=0) at a given time point if the percent reduction from baseline in MADRS total score is at least 50 percent (%). The percentage of participants who achieved at least 50% reduction from baseline were reported. MADRS is clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity, and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment. Scale consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), each of which is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent more severe condition. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the double-blind induction phase was carried forward as End Point for that phase." (NCT02417064)
Timeframe: At Day 28 (Double-blind Endpoint)
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Intranasal Esketamine 56 mg Plus Oral Antidepressant | 53.0 |
Intranasal Esketamine 84 mg Plus Oral AD | 47.8 |
Oral AD Plus Intranasal Placebo | 37.2 |
A participant was defined as having a clinical response if there was at least 50% improvement (decrease) from baseline in the MADRS total score with onset by Day 2 and Day 8 that was maintained to Day 28. Participants were allowed one excursion (non-response) on Days 8, 15 or 22, however score must show at least 25% improvement. Participants who did not meet these criteria or discontinued during the study before Day 28 were considered as non-responders and were assigned the value of 0 (that is no). MADRS is clinician-rated scale that consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), each of which is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of symptoms), for total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent more severe condition. (NCT02417064)
Timeframe: Day 2 up to Day 28 and Day 8 up to Day 28
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Day 2 up to Day 28 | Day 8 up to Day 28 | |
Intranasal Esketamine 56 mg Plus Oral Antidepressant | 10.4 | 13.0 |
Intranasal Esketamine 84 mg Plus Oral AD | 8.8 | 11.4 |
Oral AD Plus Intranasal Placebo | 1.8 | 3.5 |
A 3-part, clinician-administered scale that rates the improvement or worsening of the patient's illness from randomization (baseline). Each item is scored on a 1 to 7 scale. CGI-I scores >4 indicate worsening, while scores <4 indicate improvement. (NCT01197508)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | percentage of participants analyzed (Number) |
---|---|
0.1 mg BID TC-5214 | 59.5 |
1 mg BID TC-5214 | 62.1 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | 58.8 |
Placebo | 67.8 |
The Q-LES-Q-SF (Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form) measures the patient's satisfaction with medication and overall quality of life. The 15th item queries respondents' satisfaction with the medication they are taking. Higher scores are indicative of greater enjoyment or satisfaction in each domain. (NCT01197508)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.1 mg BID TC-5214 | 0.6 |
1 mg BID TC-5214 | 0.7 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | 0.5 |
Placebo | 0.7 |
The Q-LES-Q-SF (Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form) measures the patient's satisfaction with medication and overall quality of life. The 16th item is a global rating of overall life satisfaction and contentment. Higher scores are indicative of greater enjoyment or satisfaction in each domain. (NCT01197508)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.1 mg BID TC-5214 | 0.7 |
1 mg BID TC-5214 | 0.7 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | 0.6 |
Placebo | 0.8 |
A 17-item, clinician-rated scale that assesses depressive symptoms. The HAMD-17 consists of 17 symptoms, each of which is rated from 0 to 2 or 0 to 4, where 0 is none/absent. The HAMD-17 total score is calculated as the sum of the 17 individual symptom scores; the total score can range from 0 to 52. Higher HAMD-17 scores indicate more severe depression. (NCT01197508)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.1 mg BID TC-5214 | -10.07 |
1 mg BID TC-5214 | -10.21 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | -9.07 |
Placebo | -11.16 |
A 5-item, self-administered scale that measures the extent a patient is impaired by their disease. Higher scores indicate more severe impairment. The 3 inter-correlated domains are school/work, social life, and family life/home responsibilities. The numerical rating for the SDS family life/home responsibilities domain score is 0- 10, where 10 is considered to be 'highly impaired'. (NCT01197508)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.1 mg BID TC-5214 | -2.0 |
1 mg BID TC-5214 | -2.1 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | -2.0 |
Placebo | -2.3 |
A 5-item, self-administered scale that measures the extent a patient is impaired by their disease. Higher scores indicate more severe impairment. The 3 inter-correlated domains are school/work, social life, and family life/home responsibilities. The numerical rating for the SDS social life domain score is 0- 10, where 10 is considered to be 'highly impaired'. (NCT01197508)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.1 mg BID TC-5214 | -2.1 |
1 mg BID TC-5214 | -2.2 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | -2.2 |
Placebo | -2.4 |
A 5-item, self-administered scale that measures the extent a patient is impaired by their disease. Higher scores indicate more severe impairment. The 3 inter-correlated domains are school/work, social life, and family life/home responsibilities. The numerical rating for the work/school domain score is 0- 10, where 10 is considered to be 'highly impaired'. (NCT01197508)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.1 mg BID TC-5214 | -2.0 |
1 mg BID TC-5214 | -1.8 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | -1.9 |
Placebo | -2.1 |
Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) is 5-item, self-administered scale that measures the extent a patient is impaired by their disease. Higher scores indicate more severe impairment. The SDS total score is calculated as the sum of the score for the 3 inter-correlated domains (school/work, social life, and family life/home responsibilities) and ranges from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired). (NCT01197508)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.1 mg BID TC-5214 | -6.08 |
1 mg BID TC-5214 | -6.34 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | -6.21 |
Placebo | -7.06 |
A 14-item clinician-administered scale for the evaluation of anxiety symptoms. Each HAM-A item is rated on a 0 to 4 scale. Higher HAM-A scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. (NCT01197508)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.1 mg BID TC-5214 | -8.5 |
1 mg BID TC-5214 | -8.6 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | -8.1 |
Placebo | -9.3 |
A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms. (NCT01197508)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to Week 10
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.1 mg BID TC-5214 | -4.8 |
1 mg BID TC-5214 | -5.9 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | -5.0 |
Placebo | -6.0 |
A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms. (NCT01197508)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to Week 12
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.1 mg BID TC-5214 | -8.1 |
1 mg BID TC-5214 | -8.5 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | -7.8 |
Placebo | -8.7 |
A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms. (NCT01197508)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to Week 14
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.1 mg BID TC-5214 | -9.5 |
1 mg BID TC-5214 | -10.6 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | -9.6 |
Placebo | -11.0 |
A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms. (NCT01197508)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to Week 9
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.1 mg BID TC-5214 | -3.0 |
1 mg BID TC-5214 | -3.0 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | -2.6 |
Placebo | -3.2 |
The Q-LES-Q-SF (Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form) total score is derived by summing item scores 1 to 14. Higher scores are indicative of greater enjoyment or satisfaction in each domain. The Q-LES-Q-SF % maximum total score is calculated as 100% × (Q-LES-Q-SF total score - 14) / 56, and can range from 0% to 100%. (NCT01197508)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.1 mg BID TC-5214 | 13.08 |
1 mg BID TC-5214 | 13.24 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | 11.84 |
Placebo | 14.55 |
A 3-part, clinician-administered scale that rates the improvement or worsening of the patient's illness from randomization (baseline). Each item is scored on a 1 to 7 scale. Higher CGI-S scores indicate greater illness severity. (NCT01197508)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.1 mg BID TC-5214 | -1.5 |
1 mg BID TC-5214 | -1.6 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | -1.7 |
Placebo | -1.7 |
A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms. (NCT01197508)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.1 mg BID TC-5214 | -11.6 |
1 mg BID TC-5214 | -12.2 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | -12.2 |
Placebo | -12.7 |
"The percentage of patients with a ≥50% reduction from randomization (Week 8) in MADRS total score and a MADRS total score of ≤12 at Week 10, Week 12, Week 14, and end of treatment (Week 16) was calculated.~MADRS is 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms." (NCT01197508)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16); Week 10, Week 12, Week 14, and Week 16
Intervention | percentage of participants analyzed (Number) |
---|---|
0.1 mg BID TC-5214 | 7.5 |
1 mg BID TC-5214 | 8.1 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | 9.6 |
Placebo | 9.2 |
"The percentage of patients with a MADRS total score of ≤8 at end of treatment (Week 16) was calculated.~MADRS is 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms." (NCT01197508)
Timeframe: Week 16
Intervention | percentage of participants analyzed (Number) |
---|---|
0.1 mg BID TC-5214 | 37.0 |
1 mg BID TC-5214 | 35.1 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | 30.0 |
Placebo | 39.1 |
"The percentage of patients with a ≥50% reduction from randomization (Week 8) in MADRS total score at end of treatment (Week 16) was calculated.~MADRS is 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms." (NCT01197508)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | percentage of participants analyzed (Number) |
---|---|
0.1 mg BID TC-5214 | 48.6 |
1 mg BID TC-5214 | 51.1 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | 41.2 |
Placebo | 54.0 |
"The percentage of patients with a MADRS total score of ≤8 at Week 12, Week 14, and end of treatment (Week 16)was calculated.~MADRS is 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms." (NCT01197508)
Timeframe: Week 12, Week 14, Week 16
Intervention | percentage of participants analyzed (Number) |
---|---|
0.1 mg BID TC-5214 | 10.6 |
1 mg BID TC-5214 | 10.5 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | 8.0 |
Placebo | 12.1 |
"The percentage of patients with a ≥50% reduction from randomization (Week 8) in MADRS total score and a MADRS total score of ≤12 at Week 12, Week 14, and end of treatment (Week 16) was calculated.~MADRS is 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms." (NCT01197508)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16); Week 12, Week 14, and Week 16
Intervention | percentage of patients analyzed (Number) |
---|---|
0.1 mg BID TC-5214 | 14.7 |
1 mg BID TC-5214 | 19.3 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | 15.3 |
Placebo | 23.7 |
A self-assessment questionnaire that provides 2 measures of health status. The EQ-5D index score is a weighted linear combination over 5 dimensions of health status. The score for each of the 5 dimensions can range from 1 to 3, and an equation is used to calculate the EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D index score can range from possible negative values to a maximum of 1.0. The EQ-VAS is a visual analog scale with a range of 0 to 100. For both variables, a higher score indicates a better health state. (NCT01197508)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | |
---|---|---|
EQ-5D index score | EQ-5D VAS score | |
0.1 mg BID TC-5214 | 0.128 | 16.4 |
1 mg BID TC-5214 | 0.139 | 17.0 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | 0.133 | 15.9 |
Placebo | 0.139 | 18.7 |
A 3-part, clinician-administered scale that rates the improvement or worsening of the patient's illness from randomization (baseline). Each item is scored on a 1 to 7 scale. CGI-I scores >4 indicate worsening, while scores <4 indicate improvement. (NCT01153347)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | percentage of participants analyzed (Number) |
---|---|
0.5 mg BID TC-5214 | 48.4 |
2 mg BID TC-5214 | 49.4 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | 37.5 |
Placebo | 47.8 |
The Q-LES-Q-SF (Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form) measures the patient's satisfaction with medication and overall quality of life. The 16th item is a global rating of overall life satisfaction and contentment, rated on a 1 to 5 scale. Higher scores are indicative of greater satisfaction. (NCT01153347)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.5 mg BID TC-5214 | 0.6 |
2 mg BID TC-5214 | 0.5 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | 0.4 |
Placebo | 0.5 |
The Q-LES-Q-SF (Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form) measures the patient's satisfaction with medication and overall quality of life. The 15th item queries respondents' satisfaction with the medication they are taking, rated on a 1 to 4 scale, score 0 indicates that no medication was taken. Higher scores are indicative of greater satisfaction. (NCT01153347)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.5 mg BID TC-5214 | 0.3 |
2 mg BID TC-5214 | 0.4 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | 0.2 |
Placebo | 0.4 |
A 17-item, clinician-rated scale that assesses depressive symptoms. The HAMD-17 consists of 17 symptoms, each of which is rated from 0 to 2 or 0 to 4, where 0 is none/absent. The HAMD-17 total score is calculated as the sum of the 17 individual symptom scores; the total score can range from 0 to 52. Higher HAMD-17 scores indicate more severe depression. (NCT01153347)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.5 mg BID TC-5214 | -10.1 |
2 mg BID TC-5214 | -9.7 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | -9.5 |
Placebo | -9.1 |
A 5-item, self-administered scale that measures the extent a patient is impaired by their disease. Higher scores indicate more severe impairment. The 3 inter-correlated domains are school/work, social life, and family life/home responsibilities. The numerical rating for the SDS family life/home responsibilities domain score is 0- 10, where 10 is considered to be 'highly impaired'. (NCT01153347)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.5 mg BID TC-5214 | -1.9 |
2 mg BID TC-5214 | -1.8 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | -1.6 |
Placebo | -1.6 |
A 5-item, self-administered scale that measures the extent a patient is impaired by their disease. Higher scores indicate more severe impairment. The 3 inter-correlated domains are school/work, social life, and family life/home responsibilities. The numerical rating for the SDS social life domain score is 0- 10, where 10 is considered to be 'highly impaired'. (NCT01153347)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.5 mg BID TC-5214 | -1.9 |
2 mg BID TC-5214 | -1.9 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | -1.6 |
Placebo | -1.9 |
A 5-item, self-administered scale that measures the extent a patient is impaired by their disease. Higher scores indicate more severe impairment. The 3 inter-correlated domains are school/work, social life, and family life/home responsibilities. The numerical rating for the work/school domain score is 0- 10, where 10 is considered to be 'highly impaired'. (NCT01153347)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.5 mg BID TC-5214 | -1.7 |
2 mg BID TC-5214 | -1.8 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | -1.7 |
Placebo | -1.7 |
Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) is 5-item, self-administered scale that measures the extent a patient is impaired by their disease. Higher scores indicate more severe impairment. The SDS total score is calculated as the sum of the score for the 3 inter-correlated domains (school/work, social life, and family life/home responsibilities) and ranges from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired). (NCT01153347)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.5 mg BID TC-5214 | -5.53 |
2 mg BID TC-5214 | -5.45 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | -4.53 |
Placebo | -4.93 |
A 14-item clinician-administered scale for the evaluation of anxiety symptoms. Each HAM-A item is rated on a 0 to 4 scale, the total score can range from 0 to 56. Higher HAM-A scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. (NCT01153347)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.5 mg BID TC-5214 | -7.07 |
2 mg BID TC-5214 | -6.46 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | -6.75 |
Placebo | -6.24 |
A self-administered scale to be used by clinical subjects to rate suffering over the past week with regard to irritability symptoms. The total SIS score is the sum of 7 items, and ranges from 0 to 70. Each item is assessed on an 11- point scale where 0=not at all, 1-3=mildly, 4-6=moderately, 7-9=markedly, and 10=extremely. The SIS also records the number of days impaired by irritability. (NCT01153347)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.5 mg BID TC-5214 | -10.2 |
2 mg BID TC-5214 | -10.1 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | -8.3 |
Placebo | -8.8 |
A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms. (NCT01153347)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to Week 10
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.5 mg BID TC-5214 | -6.3 |
2 mg BID TC-5214 | -6.9 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | -7.3 |
Placebo | -7.1 |
A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms. (NCT01153347)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to Week 12
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.5 mg BID TC-5214 | -9.4 |
2 mg BID TC-5214 | -9.4 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | -8.9 |
Placebo | -8.5 |
A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms. (NCT01153347)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to Week 14
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.5 mg BID TC-5214 | -11.0 |
2 mg BID TC-5214 | -11.3 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | -10.6 |
Placebo | -10.7 |
A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms. (NCT01153347)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to Week 9
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.5 mg BID TC-5214 | -4.0 |
2 mg BID TC-5214 | -5.1 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | -4.0 |
Placebo | -5.0 |
The Q-LES-Q-SF total score is derived by summing item scores 1 to 14. Higher scores are indicative of greater enjoyment or satisfaction in each domain. The Q-LES-Q-SF % maximum total score is calculated as 100% × (Q-LES-Q-SF total score - 14) / 56, and can range from 0% to 100%. (NCT01153347)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.5 mg BID TC-5214 | 12.81 |
2 mg BID TC-5214 | 11.42 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | 8.83 |
Placebo | 10.71 |
A 3-part, clinician-administered scale that rates the improvement or worsening of the patient's illness from randomization (baseline). Each item is scored on a 1 to 7 scale. Higher CGI-S scores indicate greater illness severity. (NCT01153347)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.5 mg BID TC-5214 | -1.3 |
2 mg BID TC-5214 | -1.3 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | -1.2 |
Placebo | -1.2 |
A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms. (NCT01153347)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
0.5 mg BID TC-5214 | -12.1 |
2 mg BID TC-5214 | -11.8 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | -11.3 |
Placebo | -11.2 |
"The percentage of patients with a ≥50% reduction from randomization (Week 8) in MADRS total score and a MADRS total score of ≤12 at Week 10, Week 12, Week 14, and end of treatment (Week 16) was calculated.~A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms." (NCT01153347)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16); Week 10, Week 12, Week 14, and Week 16
Intervention | percentage of participants analyzed (Number) |
---|---|
0.5 mg BID TC-5214 | 8.8 |
2 mg BID TC-5214 | 7.8 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | 8.3 |
Placebo | 8.5 |
"The percentage of patients with a MADRS total score of ≤8 at end of treatment (Week 16) was calculated.~A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms." (NCT01153347)
Timeframe: Week 16
Intervention | percentage of participants analyzed (Number) |
---|---|
0.5 mg BID TC-5214 | 29.0 |
2 mg BID TC-5214 | 26.9 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | 23.7 |
Placebo | 29.9 |
"The percentage of patients with a ≥50% reduction from randomization (Week 8) in MADRS total score at end of treatment (Week 16) was calculated.~A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms." (NCT01153347)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | percentage of participants analyzed (Number) |
---|---|
0.5 mg BID TC-5214 | 43.9 |
2 mg BID TC-5214 | 39.7 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | 38.8 |
Placebo | 42.7 |
"The percentage of patients with a MADRS total score of ≤8 at Week 12, Week 14, and end of treatment (Week 16)was calculated.~A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms." (NCT01153347)
Timeframe: Week 12, Week 14, Week 16
Intervention | percentage of participants analyzed (Number) |
---|---|
0.5 mg BID TC-5214 | 10.3 |
2 mg BID TC-5214 | 12.7 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | 7.6 |
Placebo | 9.2 |
"The percentage of patients with a ≥50% reduction from randomization (Week 8) in MADRS total score and a MADRS total score of ≤12 at Week 12, Week 14, and end of treatment (Week 16) was calculated.~A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms." (NCT01153347)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16); Week 12, Week 14, and Week 16
Intervention | percentage of patients analyzed (Number) |
---|---|
0.5 mg BID TC-5214 | 15.9 |
2 mg BID TC-5214 | 18.7 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | 14.0 |
Placebo | 15.9 |
A self-assessment questionnaire that provides 2 measures of health status. The EQ-5D index score is a weighted linear combination over 5 dimensions of health status. The score for each of the 5 dimensions can range from 1 to 3, and an equation is used to calculate the EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D index score can range from possible negative values (minimum -0.415) to a maximum of 1.0. The EQ-VAS is a visual analog scale with a range of 0 to 100. For both variables, a higher score indicates a better health state. (NCT01153347)
Timeframe: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | |
---|---|---|
EQ-5D index score | EQ-5D VAS score | |
0.5 mg BID TC-5214 | 0.114 | 13.4 |
2 mg BID TC-5214 | 0.107 | 12.9 |
4 mg BID TC-5214 | 0.106 | 10.3 |
Placebo | 0.120 | 11.5 |
Survival function is estimating the probability of participants not achieving confirmed remission. Confirmed remission is defined as a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 Items (HAMD-17) Score of ≤ 7 that is maintained for two consecutive visits. The 17-item HAMD measures depression severity. Each item was evaluated and scored using either a 5-point scale (e.g. absent, mild, moderate, severe, very severe) or a 3-point scale (e.g. absent, mild, marked). The total score of HAMD-17 may range from 0 (normal) to 52 (severe). (NCT00810069)
Timeframe: Week 4 through Week 16
Intervention | estimated probability (percent) (Mean) |
---|---|
Early Intervention | 52 |
Delayed Intervention | 59 |
Survival function is estimating the probability of participants not achieving confirmed response after 12 weeks. Confirmed response is defined as >=50% change from baseline reduction in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 Items (HAMD-17). The 17-item HAMD measures depression severity. Each item was evaluated and scored using either a 5-point scale (e.g. absent, mild, moderate, severe, very severe) or a 3-point scale (e.g. absent, mild, marked). The total score of HAMD-17 may range from 0 (normal) to 52 (severe). (NCT00810069)
Timeframe: Week 4 through Week 16
Intervention | estimated probability (percent) (Mean) |
---|---|
Early Intervention | 28 |
Delayed Intervention | 26 |
Time to confirmed remission is defined as the time from the day of study randomization (Visit 2) to the date of first observation of confirmed remission. A 16-item participant-rated measure of depressive symptomatology. The total score ranges from 0 to 27 with higher scores indicative of greater severity. (NCT00810069)
Timeframe: Week 4 through Week 16
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Early Intervention | NA |
Delayed Intervention | NA |
Time to confirmed remission is defined as the time from the day of study randomization (Visit 2) to the date of first observation of confirmed remission defined as a score on the HAMD-17 of ≤ 7 for 2 consecutive visits. The 17-item HAMD measures depression severity. Each item was evaluated and scored using either a 5-point scale (e.g. absent, mild, moderate, severe, very severe) or a 3-point scale (e.g. absent, mild, marked). The total score of HAMD-17 may range from 0 (normal) to 52 (severe). (NCT00810069)
Timeframe: Week 4 through Week 16
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Early Intervention | 12.9 |
Delayed Intervention | NA |
Time to confirmed response is defined as the time from the day of study randomization (Visit 2) to the date of first observation of confirmed response. QIDS16SR is a 16-item participant-rated measure of depressive symptomatology. The total score ranges from 0 to 27 with higher scores indicative of greater severity. (NCT00810069)
Timeframe: Week 4 through Week 16
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Early Intervention | 6.0 |
Delayed Intervention | 6.9 |
Time to confirmed response is defined as the time from the day of study randomization (Visit 2) to the date of first observation of confirmed response defined as ≥ 50% baseline score reduction on the HAMD-17 for 2 consecutive visits. The 17-item HAMD measures depression severity. Each item was evaluated and scored using either a 5-point scale, e.g. absent, mild, moderate, severe, very severe) or a 3-point scale (e.g. absent, mild, marked). The total score of HAMD-17 may range from 0 (normal) to 52 (severe). (NCT00810069)
Timeframe: Week 4 through Week 16
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Early Intervention | 6.4 |
Delayed Intervention | 8.0 |
Measures severity of illness at the time of assessment compared with start of treatment. Scores range from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). (NCT00810069)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 10, Week 12, Week 14, Week 16
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=282, 284) | Week 4 (n=281, 284) | Week 6 (n=271, 277) | Week 8 (n=254, 254) | Week 10 (n=231, 236) | Week 12 (n=203, 214) | Week 14 (n=184, 194) | Week 16 (n=178, 182) | |
Delayed Intervention | 4.6 | 4.3 | 3.7 | 3.3 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 2.2 |
Early Intervention | 4.6 | 4.3 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 2.2 |
The EQ-5D Health State Score is self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale measured in centimeters (cm) and reported as units on a scale. Best imaginable health state = 10 cm and worst imaginable health state = 0 cm. (NCT00810069)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=281, 283) | Week 4 (n=282, 280) | Week 8 (n=244, 237) | Week 12 (n=169, 177) | Week 16 (n=142, 153) | |
Delayed Intervention | 3.9 | 4.5 | 5.4 | 5.8 | 6.5 |
Early Intervention | 4.2 | 4.9 | 5.7 | 5.9 | 6.5 |
The EQ-5D is a generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality of life instrument. The profile allows participants to rate their health state in 5 health domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and mood. A single score between 1 and 3 is generated for each domain. For each participant, the outcome rating on the 5 domains will be mapped to a single index through an algorithm. The index ranges between 0 and 1, with the higher score indicating a better health state perceived by the participant. (NCT00810069)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=279, 282) | Week 4 (n=279, 282) | Week 8 (n=244, 238) | Week 12 (n=168, 178) | Week 16 (n=143, 153) | |
Delayed Intervention | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.7 |
Early Intervention | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 |
The list of AEs is located in the Reported Adverse Event module. (NCT00810069)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 16
Intervention | participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Number of participants with adverse events | Number of participants with serious adverse events | |
Delayed Intervention | 101 | 4 |
Early Intervention | 112 | 8 |
(NCT00810069)
Timeframe: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | Week 16 | |
Delayed Intervention | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Early Intervention | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(NCT00810069)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Intervention | Hours (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Week 4 (n=153, 159) | Week 8 (n=136, 141) | Week 12 (n=119, 115) | Week 16 (n=96, 96) | |
Delayed Intervention | 38.6 | 37.7 | 38.1 | 38.0 |
Early Intervention | 37.7 | 37.9 | 37.7 | 37.2 |
(NCT00810069)
Timeframe: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Intervention | Visits (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Week 4 (n=25, 16) | Week 8 (n=8, 8) | Week 12 (n=3, 2) | Week 16 (n=2, 1) | |
Delayed Intervention | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.0 | 3.0 |
Early Intervention | 2.2 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 2.0 |
(NCT00810069)
Timeframe: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Intervention | Visits (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Week 4 (n=36, 55) | Week 8 (n=14, 22) | Week 12 (n=8, 12) | Week 16 (n=4, 7) | |
Delayed Intervention | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
Early Intervention | 1.5 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 2.0 |
Only those participants who missed at least 1 hour of work due to depression were included. (NCT00810069)
Timeframe: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Intervention | Hours (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Week 4 (n=70, 86) | Week 8 (n=47, 61) | Week 12 (n=31, 52) | Week 16 (n=24, 38) | |
Delayed Intervention | 95.1 | 109.7 | 111.4 | 126.0 |
Early Intervention | 90.6 | 98.5 | 98.7 | 91.9 |
Only those participants who missed at least 1 hour of work were included. (NCT00810069)
Timeframe: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Intervention | Hours (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Week 4 (n=73, 89) | Week 8 (n=54, 67) | Week 12 (n=38, 56) | Week 16 (n=25, 39) | |
Delayed Intervention | 95.0 | 102.3 | 104.5 | 126.4 |
Early Intervention | 88.6 | 92.5 | 85.0 | 91.5 |
The SDS is completed by the participant and is used to assess the effect of the participant's symptoms on their work/social/family life. Total scores range from 0 to 30 with higher values indicating greater disruption in the participant's work/social/family life. (NCT00810069)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=216, 217) | Week 4 (n=215, 215) | Week 8 (n=186, 188) | Week 12 (n=140, 144) | Week 16 (n=113, 121) | |
Delayed Intervention | 19.9 | 17.5 | 14.0 | 13.2 | 10.2 |
Early Intervention | 19.9 | 16.9 | 13.5 | 12.1 | 10.3 |
VAS for pain consists of 6 questions that assess overall pain, headache, back pain, shoulder pain, pain interference with daily activities, and pain while awake. Participant rates pain on a 10 centimeter (cm) line between two anchors (0= no pain and 10=very severe pain). (NCT00810069)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 10, Week 12, Week 14, Week 16
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=282, 284) | Week 4 (n=281, 283) | Week 6 (n=270, 271) | Week 8 (n=245, 241) | Week 10 (n=207, 204) | Week 12 (n=170, 181) | Week 14 (n=151, 152) | Week 16 (n=143, 152) | |
Delayed Intervention | 3.8 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 2.3 |
Early Intervention | 3.6 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
1 review available for citalopram and Refractory Depression
Article | Year |
---|---|
Understanding treatment-resistant depression using "omics" techniques: A systematic review.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Calcium; Citalopram; Depression; Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant; Hu | 2022 |
18 trials available for citalopram and Refractory Depression
Article | Year |
---|---|
Modulation of the inflammatory response benefits treatment-resistant bipolar depression: A randomized clinical trial.
Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antidepressive Agents; Bipolar Disorder; Celecoxib; | 2020 |
Effects of adjunctive inflammatory modulation on IL-1β in treatment resistant bipolar depression.
Topics: Bipolar Disorder; Celecoxib; Citalopram; Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant; Humans; Interleuk | 2020 |
Investigation of miR-1202, miR-135a, and miR-16 in Major Depressive Disorder and Antidepressant Response.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Biomarkers; Citalopram; Clinical Decision-Making; Depressive Disorder, Major; | 2017 |
Increased hippocampal tail volume predicts depression status and remission to anti-depressant medications in major depression.
Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Antidepressive Agents; Citalopram; Cohort Studies; Delayed-Action Preparations; | 2018 |
Benefits of Sequentially Adding Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy or Antidepressant Medication for Adults With Nonremitting Depression.
Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Citalopram; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Combined Modality Therapy; D | 2019 |
Efficacy and Safety of Flexibly Dosed Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a Newly Initiated Oral Antidepressant in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Double-Blind Active-Controlled Study.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Citalopram; Depressi | 2019 |
Efficacy and Safety of Flexibly Dosed Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a Newly Initiated Oral Antidepressant in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Double-Blind Active-Controlled Study.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Citalopram; Depressi | 2019 |
Efficacy and Safety of Flexibly Dosed Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a Newly Initiated Oral Antidepressant in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Double-Blind Active-Controlled Study.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Citalopram; Depressi | 2019 |
Efficacy and Safety of Flexibly Dosed Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a Newly Initiated Oral Antidepressant in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Double-Blind Active-Controlled Study.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Citalopram; Depressi | 2019 |
Efficacy and Safety of Fixed-Dose Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a New Oral Antidepressant in Treatment-Resistant Depression: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Study (TRANSFORM-1).
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Citalopr | 2019 |
Impact of treatments for depression on comorbid anxiety, attentional, and behavioral symptoms in adolescents with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-resistant depression.
Topics: Adolescent; Anxiety; Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders; Behavioral Symptoms; Cital | 2013 |
The bidirectional relationship between body mass index and treatment outcome in adolescents with treatment-resistant depression.
Topics: Adolescent; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Body Mass Index; Child; Citalopram; Cyclohexan | 2013 |
Additional intranasal oxytocin to escitalopram improves depressive symptoms in resistant depression: an open trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Adult; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Ci | 2015 |
Pilot study of feasibility of the effect of treatment with tDCS in patients suffering from treatment-resistant depression treated with escitalopram.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antidepressive Agents; Citalopram; Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant; Double-Bli | 2015 |
Two Phase III randomised double-blind studies of fixed-dose TC-5214 (dexmecamylamine) adjunct to ongoing antidepressant therapy in patients with major depressive disorder and an inadequate response to prior antidepressant therapy.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antidepressive Agents; Citalopram; Depressive Disorder, Major; Depressive D | 2015 |
Two Phase III randomised double-blind studies of fixed-dose TC-5214 (dexmecamylamine) adjunct to ongoing antidepressant therapy in patients with major depressive disorder and an inadequate response to prior antidepressant therapy.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antidepressive Agents; Citalopram; Depressive Disorder, Major; Depressive D | 2015 |
Two Phase III randomised double-blind studies of fixed-dose TC-5214 (dexmecamylamine) adjunct to ongoing antidepressant therapy in patients with major depressive disorder and an inadequate response to prior antidepressant therapy.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antidepressive Agents; Citalopram; Depressive Disorder, Major; Depressive D | 2015 |
Two Phase III randomised double-blind studies of fixed-dose TC-5214 (dexmecamylamine) adjunct to ongoing antidepressant therapy in patients with major depressive disorder and an inadequate response to prior antidepressant therapy.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antidepressive Agents; Citalopram; Depressive Disorder, Major; Depressive D | 2015 |
Socio-demographic and clinical predictors of treatment resistant depression: A prospective European multicenter study.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antidepressive Agents; Citalopram; Depressive Disorder, Major; Depressive D | 2016 |
Randomized controlled study of early medication change for non-improvers to antidepressant therapy in major depression--The EMC trial.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antidepressive Agents; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Citalopram | 2016 |
Prediction of nonremission to antidepressant therapy using diffusion tensor imaging.
Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Brain; Citalopram; Delayed-Action Preparations; Depressive Disorder, M | 2016 |
Neuroplasticity and second messenger pathways in antidepressant efficacy: pharmacogenetic results from a prospective trial investigating treatment resistance.
Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Citalopram; Databases, Genetic; Depressive Disorder | 2017 |
Treating depression after initial treatment failure: directly comparing switch and augmenting strategies in STAR*D.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Bupropion; Buspirone; Citalopram; | 2012 |
Early switch strategy in patients with major depressive disorder: a double-blind, randomized study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antidepressive Agents; Citalopram; Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Re | 2012 |
13 other studies available for citalopram and Refractory Depression
Article | Year |
---|---|
Partial resistance to citalopram in a Wistar-Kyoto rat model of depression: An evaluation using resting-state functional MRI and graph analysis.
Topics: Animals; Citalopram; Depression; Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant; Disease Models, Animal; H | 2022 |
Gene expression signature of antidepressant treatment response/non-response in Flinders Sensitive Line rats subjected to maternal separation.
Topics: Animals; Antidepressive Agents; Citalopram; Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant; Disease Models | 2020 |
Rapid antidepressant effects of deep brain stimulation of the pre-frontal cortex in an animal model of treatment-resistant depression.
Topics: Animals; Antidepressive Agents; Behavior, Animal; Citalopram; Deep Brain Stimulation; Depressive Dis | 2018 |
Validation of chronic mild stress in the Wistar-Kyoto rat as an animal model of treatment-resistant depression.
Topics: Animals; Antidepressive Agents; Behavior, Animal; Citalopram; Depression; Depressive Disorder; Depre | 2019 |
Switching Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Adolescents with Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor-Resistant Major Depressive Disorder: Balancing Tolerability and Efficacy.
Topics: Adolescent; Citalopram; Depressive Disorder, Major; Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant; Fluoxe | 2019 |
Attrition in treatment-resistant depression: predictors and clinical impact.
Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Citalopram; Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistan | 2019 |
Bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccine induces a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)-resistant depression like phenotype in mice.
Topics: Animals; BCG Vaccine; Behavior, Animal; Brain; Citalopram; Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant; | 2014 |
What to expect from a third step in treatment resistant depression: A prospective open study on escitalopram.
Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Citalopram; Depressive Disorder, Major; Depressive Disorder, Treatment | 2015 |
Dopamine Receptor D2 and Associated microRNAs Are Involved in Stress Susceptibility and Resistance to Escitalopram Treatment.
Topics: Animals; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Chronic Disease; Citalopram; Corpus Striatum; Dep | 2015 |
Brain Histamine Is Crucial for Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors' Behavioral and Neurochemical Effects.
Topics: 8-Bromo Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate; Animals; Antidepressive Agents; Brain; Citalopram; Cyclic AM | 2015 |
Hyponatraemia and confusion in a 70-year-old female when bupropion was added to dothiepin and escitalopram.
Topics: Aged; Antidepressive Agents; Bupropion; Citalopram; Confusion; Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resist | 2015 |
Analysis of 23andMe antidepressant efficacy survey data: implication of circadian rhythm and neuroplasticity in bupropion response.
Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Bupropion; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 4; Circadian Rhythm; Citalopram; D | 2016 |
Gene expression and proliferation biomarkers for antidepressant treatment resistance.
Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B; Biomarkers; Cell Line; | 2017 |