citalopram and Recrudescence

citalopram has been researched along with Recrudescence in 86 studies

Citalopram: A furancarbonitrile that is one of the serotonin uptake inhibitors used as an antidepressant. The drug is also effective in reducing ethanol uptake in alcoholics and is used in depressed patients who also suffer from TARDIVE DYSKINESIA in preference to tricyclic antidepressants, which aggravate dyskinesia.
citalopram : A racemate comprising equimolar amounts of (R)-citalopram and its enantiomer, escitalopram. It is used as an antidepressant, although only escitalopram is active.
1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dihydro-2-benzofuran-5-carbonitrile : A nitrile that is 1,3-dihydro-2-benzofuran-5-carbonitrile in which one of the hydrogens at position 1 is replaced by a p-fluorophenyl group, while the other is replaced by a 3-(dimethylamino)propyl group.

Research

Studies (86)

Authors

Clinical Trials (19)

Trial Overview

Trial Outcomes

Change in Daily Frequency of Hot Flashes Between Baseline and Week 4 as Assessed by Prospective Daily Diaries

Change in daily hot flash frequency was calculated as the daily mean difference between baseline and week 4. Baseline was calculated as the daily mean of the daily frequencies for the first two screening weeks. Week 4 was calculated as the daily mean of the daily frequencies during the week prior to the week 4 visit. (NCT00894543)
Timeframe: week 4 minus baseline

Change in Daily Frequency of Hot Flashes Between Baseline and Week 8 as Assessed by Prospective Daily Diaries

Change in daily hot flash frequency was calculated as the daily mean difference between baseline and week 8. Baseline was calculated as the daily mean of the frequencies for the first two screening weeks. Week 8 was calculated as the daily mean of the daily frequencies during the week prior to the week 8 visit. (NCT00894543)
Timeframe: week 8 minus baseline

Change in Daily Hot Flash Bother Between Baseline and Week 4 as Recorded on Daily Diaries

"Change in daily hot flash bother was calculated as the mean difference between baseline and week 4. Baseline was calculated as the daily mean of the highest daily bother ratings during the first two screening weeks. Week 4 was calculated as the daily mean of the highest of the daily bother ratings during the week prior to the week 4 visit.~Hot flash bother was rated as 1 (none), 2 (a little), 3 (moderately), or 4 (a lot) as adopted from the Study of Women Across the Nation (SWAN)." (NCT00894543)
Timeframe: week 4 minus baseline

Change in Daily Severity of Hot Flashes Between Baseline and Week 4 as Assessed by Prospective Daily Diaries

"Change in daily hot flash severity from baseline to week 4 was calculated as the mean difference in hot flash severity ratings between baseline and week 4. Baseline was calculated as the daily mean from the first two weeks of hot flash severity ratings. Week 4 severity ratings were calculated as the daily mean from the ratings for the week prior to the week 4 visit.~Hot flash severity was rated as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (severe) as adopted from the Study of Women Across the Nation (SWAN)." (NCT00894543)
Timeframe: week 4 minus baseline

Change in Daily Severity of Hot Flashes Between Baseline and Week 8 as Assessed by Prospective Daily Diaries

Change in daily hot flash severity between baseline & week 8 was calculated as mean difference. Baseline severity ratings were calculated as daily mean ratings for the first two screening weeks pre-baseline. Week 8 severity ratings were calculated as daily mean ratings during the week before week 8. Modified intention to treat analysis included all randomized participants who provided diary data, which were analyzed regardless of adherence to treatment assignment. Hot flash severity was rated as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (severe) as adopted from the Study of Women Across the Nation (SWAN). (NCT00894543)
Timeframe: week 8 minus baseline

Daily Frequency of Hot Flashes Per Day Assessed by Prospective Daily Diaries

Baseline hot flash frequency per day was calculated as the daily mean of the daily totals reported during the first two screening weeks. (NCT00894543)
Timeframe: Baseline

Daily Hot Flash Bother, Recorded on Daily Diaries

"Daily Hot flash bother scores were calculated by selecting the highest bother rating for hot flashes or night sweats for each woman in each 24-hour day. The score was set to missing on on any day data were missing or or hot flashes equaled 0. The daily mean of daily ratings for the first 2 screening weeks is reported.~Hot flash bother was rated as 1 (none), 2 (a little), 3 (moderately), or 4 (a lot) as adopted from the Study of Women Across the Nation (SWAN)." (NCT00894543)
Timeframe: Baseline

Daily Severity of Hot Flashes Assessed by Prospective Daily Diaries

"Daily hot flash severity scores were calculated by by selecting the highest severity rating for hot flashes or night sweats for each woman in each 24-hour day. The score was set to missing on on any day data were missing or or hot flashes equaled 0. The daily mean of daily ratings for the first 2 screening weeks is reported.~Hot flash severity was rated as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (severe) as adopted from the Study of Women Across the Nation (SWAN)." (NCT00894543)
Timeframe: Baseline

Secondary Outcome: Change in Daily Hot Flash Bother Between Baseline and Week 8 as Recorded on Daily Diaries

Change in daily hot flash bother between baseline & week 8 was calculated as mean difference. Baseline daily bother was the mean of the highest daily ratings for two screening weeks pre-baseline. Week 8 bother was daily mean of the highest daily bother ratings during the week before week 8. Modified intention to treat analysis included all randomized participants who provided diary data, which were analyzed regardless of adherence to treatment assignment. Hot flash bother was rated as 1 (none), 2 (a little), 3 (moderately), 4 (a lot) as adopted from the Study of Women Across the Nation (SWAN). (NCT00894543)
Timeframe: week 8 minus baseline

Functioning, as Measured by the Social Adjustment Scale (SAS) Summary Score

Social adjustment was measured using the Social Adjustment Scale (SAS). The SAS is a self-report scale that assesses depressive symptoms and functioning in nine social and work-related domains generating a total score that is indicative of a subject's overall level of social adjustment. Subjects rate their own social functioning over times on a 5-point scale on items covering work for pay, housework, extended family, parenting, marital status, social activity and leisure, family unit and student status (sub-scales). Mean values of all the sub-scales are used, with a range from 0-5. Higher score = worse outcome … worse functioning (NCT00519428)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Quality of Life, as Measured by the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Short Form (SF)

"The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) intends to measure quality of life in 16 domains. A summary score is computed by adding the scores and dividing by 16 (or the number of answered items if some are not answered).~The minimum raw score on the Q-LES-Q-SF is 14, and the maximum score is 70. Higher score means more satisfaction." (NCT00519428)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Remission: Persistent Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 17 Items (HAM-D 17) <= 7, With no HAM-D 17 >7 Through Week 12

Chi square comparison of rates of persistent remission (i.e., no subsequent Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 17 items [HAMD-D 17] > 7 once HAMD-D 17 <= 7); Dual rate vs. Escitalopram only rate and Dual rate vs. Bupropion only rate. (NCT00519428)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Severity of Depressive Symptoms as Measured by Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D 17)

"Last summary score rating on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression Eight items are scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 = not present to 4 = severe. Nine are scored from 0-2. Range 0-58.~0-7 = Normal 8-13 = Mild Depression 14-18 = Moderate Depression 19-22 = Severe Depression~≥ 23 = Very Severe Depression" (NCT00519428)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Time to Remission, Defined by the Week of Onset of Persistent Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D 17) <= 7, With no Subsequent HAM-D 17 > 7

Life Table Survival Analysis run twice, once comparing Dual Therapy (i.e., Bupropion + Escitalopram) to Bupropion alone (i.e., Bupropion + Placebo) and once comparing Dual Therapy to Escitalopram alone (i.e., Escitalopram + Placebo). Because both analyses must significantly favor Dual Therapy, each individual analysis must reach a critical alpha = .0916 in order to reach an over-all alpha = .05. (NCT00519428)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Quality of Life Inventory

The Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI) is a 32-item comprehensive self-report of satisfaction in 16 areas of life, such as love, work, and health. Each area is rated in terms of satisfaction and the relationship of that area to overall quality of life. It yields an overall raw score and satisfaction ratings for the 16 individual areas of life. The QOLI raw score is an average of weighted satisfaction ratings computed only over areas of life judged to be Important or Extremely Important to the respondent. Higher scores indicate higher reported quality of life. (NCT00590863)
Timeframe: Measured at Month 7

Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms

Percentage of patients that achieve remission, as defined as QIDS total score below 6 for last 2 study visits. QIDS depression scores range from 0 (normal) to 27 (very severe). (NCT00590863)
Timeframe: Measured at Month 7

Abdominal Pain Index (API)

The API is a well-validated and reliable measure of abdominal pain assessing the frequency, duration, and intensity of abdominal pain consisting of five items assessing the frequency, duration, and intensity of abdominal pain experienced during the prior 2 weeks. Two of the items are scored from 0 to 5, one is scaled 0 to 8, and two are scaled 0 to 10, with lower scores considered to be better than higher scores. Item scores are standardized using Z-scores and then summed to yield an index of abdominal pain that has been sensitive to change in previous epidemiological and treatment studies of FAP. Alpha reliability ranged from 0.80 to 0.93. The API will be a continuous primary outcome measure of abdominal pain. (NCT00962039)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8

Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R)

Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) is a clinician administered measure of depression in children and adolescents and provides data necessary to diagnose depressive disorder and rate the severity of depressive symptoms over time. The CDRS-R is composed of 17 items, most rated on a 1 to 7 scale, with a minimum score of 17 and a maximum of 113. Higher scores reflect greater depression severity, with scores of 40 and above generally considered to be reflective of a depressive diagnosis. (NCT00962039)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8

Children's Global Assessment Scale (C-GAS)

Children's Global Assessment Scale (C-GAS) is an interview-based adaptation of the Global Assessment Scale developed to assess child and adolescent functioning during a specified time period. Scores range from one to 100, with scores of 70 or below reflecting abnormally low functioning and higher scores reflecting better functioning. The C-GAS has demonstrated reliability, as well as discriminant and concurrent validity. A CGAS score of < 70 will be a requirement at study entry. (NCT00962039)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8

Clinical Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) Will be Used to Assess Overall Global Illness Improvement. CGI-I Scores of 1 (Very Much Improved) or 2 (Much Improved) Indicate an Acceptable Treatment Response.

Clinical Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) is a 7-point scale, with lower values being more favorable, used to assess overall global illness improvement. The CGI is a clinician-completed measure, with values ranging from 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (much worse), to 7 (very much worse). CGI-I scores of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) were considered to indicate an acceptable treatment response. A global measure of functional status was chosen as a primary outcome due to the broad array of symptomatology seen in pediatric RAP and the ambiguous relationship between functional status and symptoms of pain, anxiety, and depression in pediatric RAP. The CGI-I is a dichotomous primary outcome measure of global clinical improvement with clinical response be defined as a CGI-I score of 1 or 2 for at least two consecutive weeks. (NCT00962039)
Timeframe: The CGI will be completed at weeks 2, 4, and 8

Clinical Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S)

Clinical Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale is a clinician-completed measure that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment relative to the clinician's past experience with patients who have the same diagnosis. Considering total clinical experience, a patient is assessed on severity of illness at the time of rating, with values ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill), 2 (borderline ill), 3 (mildly ill), 4 (moderately ill), 5 (markedly ill), 6 (severely ill), to 7 (extremely ill). (NCT00962039)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8

Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS)

Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) is a clinician administered measure of anxiety in children and adolescents. The PARS is comprised of a 50-item symptom checklist used to determine the presence or absence of specific anxiety symptoms during the prior week and 7 severity/impairment items, each scored from 0 to 5 . The the score on the 7 items allows the clinician to rate symptom severity and associated impairment on a range from 0 to 35, with higher scores reflecting greater symptom severity and associated impairment. The PARS is characterized by high interrater reliability (ICC = 0.97), adequate internal consistency (α = 0.64), and fair test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.55). There is preliminary support for convergent and divergent validity, and the PARS has demonstrated sensitivity to treatment effects in previously conducted clinical trials. (NCT00962039)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8

Reviews

8 reviews available for citalopram and Recrudescence

Trials

39 trials available for citalopram and Recrudescence

Other Studies

39 other studies available for citalopram and Recrudescence