citalopram has been researched along with Lassitude in 16 studies
Citalopram: A furancarbonitrile that is one of the serotonin uptake inhibitors used as an antidepressant. The drug is also effective in reducing ethanol uptake in alcoholics and is used in depressed patients who also suffer from TARDIVE DYSKINESIA in preference to tricyclic antidepressants, which aggravate dyskinesia.
citalopram : A racemate comprising equimolar amounts of (R)-citalopram and its enantiomer, escitalopram. It is used as an antidepressant, although only escitalopram is active.
1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dihydro-2-benzofuran-5-carbonitrile : A nitrile that is 1,3-dihydro-2-benzofuran-5-carbonitrile in which one of the hydrogens at position 1 is replaced by a p-fluorophenyl group, while the other is replaced by a 3-(dimethylamino)propyl group.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"The authors sought to determine the relative efficacy and tolerability of duloxetine versus citalopram and sertraline in the treatment of poststroke depression (PSD), anxiety, and fatigue." | 9.16 | Duloxetine versus citalopram and sertraline in the treatment of poststroke depression, anxiety, and fatigue. ( Karaiskos, D; Paparrigopoulos, T; Spengos, K; Tzavellas, E; Vassilopoulou, S, 2012) |
"In design 1, fatigue for subjects taking citalopram was significantly and substantially reduced when subjects were switched from placebo to citalopram, p <." | 9.10 | The effectiveness of citalopram for idiopathic chronic fatigue. ( Bentler, SE; Brake, KA; Hartz, AJ; Kelly, MW, 2003) |
"The aim of the study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram in treating poststroke depression, since available treatments are usually poorly tolerated." | 9.07 | Effective treatment of poststroke depression with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram. ( Andersen, G; Lauritzen, L; Vestergaard, K, 1994) |
"To explore relationships between baseline and changes in fatigue during treatment with outcomes in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) receiving citalopram monotherapy." | 5.19 | Impact of fatigue on outcome of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment: secondary analysis of STAR*D. ( Dennehy, EB; Ferguson, M; Marangell, LB; Martinez, J; Wisniewski, SR, 2014) |
"The authors sought to determine the relative efficacy and tolerability of duloxetine versus citalopram and sertraline in the treatment of poststroke depression (PSD), anxiety, and fatigue." | 5.16 | Duloxetine versus citalopram and sertraline in the treatment of poststroke depression, anxiety, and fatigue. ( Karaiskos, D; Paparrigopoulos, T; Spengos, K; Tzavellas, E; Vassilopoulou, S, 2012) |
"In design 1, fatigue for subjects taking citalopram was significantly and substantially reduced when subjects were switched from placebo to citalopram, p <." | 5.10 | The effectiveness of citalopram for idiopathic chronic fatigue. ( Bentler, SE; Brake, KA; Hartz, AJ; Kelly, MW, 2003) |
"The aim of the study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram in treating poststroke depression, since available treatments are usually poorly tolerated." | 5.07 | Effective treatment of poststroke depression with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram. ( Andersen, G; Lauritzen, L; Vestergaard, K, 1994) |
"Aripiprazole is an effective and safe adjunctive therapy as demonstrated in this short-term study for patients who are nonresponsive to standard ADT." | 2.73 | The efficacy and safety of aripiprazole as adjunctive therapy in major depressive disorder: a second multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. ( Berman, RM; Carson, WH; Fava, M; Hennicken, D; Marcus, RN; McQuade, RD; Simon, JS; Thase, ME; Trivedi, MH, 2008) |
"Escitalopram was well tolerated." | 2.72 | An open-label study of escitalopram in body dysmorphic disorder. ( Phillips, KA, 2006) |
"Late-life depression is associated with substantial heterogeneity in clinical presentation, disability, and response to antidepressant treatment." | 1.91 | Cognitive, Disability, and Treatment Outcome Implications of Symptom-Based Phenotyping in Late-Life Depression. ( Conway, C; Elson, D; Kang, H; Sudol, K; Szymkowicz, SM; Taylor, WD, 2023) |
"Fatigue is a common symptom in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS)." | 1.39 | Reward responsiveness and fatigue in multiple sclerosis. ( Capello, E; Krueger, F; Mancardi, G; Pardini, M; Uccelli, A, 2013) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 1 (6.25) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 7 (43.75) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 7 (43.75) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 1 (6.25) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Sudol, K | 1 |
Conway, C | 1 |
Szymkowicz, SM | 1 |
Elson, D | 1 |
Kang, H | 1 |
Taylor, WD | 1 |
Boston, CD | 1 |
Ferguson, M | 1 |
Dennehy, EB | 1 |
Marangell, LB | 1 |
Martinez, J | 1 |
Wisniewski, SR | 1 |
Rizo, C | 1 |
Deshpande, A | 1 |
Ing, A | 1 |
Seeman, N | 1 |
Hannestad, J | 1 |
DellaGioia, N | 1 |
Ortiz, N | 1 |
Pittman, B | 1 |
Bhagwagar, Z | 1 |
Bould, H | 1 |
Wiles, N | 1 |
Potokar, J | 1 |
Cowen, P | 1 |
Nutt, DJ | 1 |
Peters, TJ | 1 |
Lewis, G | 1 |
Pardini, M | 1 |
Capello, E | 1 |
Krueger, F | 1 |
Mancardi, G | 1 |
Uccelli, A | 1 |
Karaiskos, D | 1 |
Tzavellas, E | 1 |
Spengos, K | 1 |
Vassilopoulou, S | 1 |
Paparrigopoulos, T | 1 |
Hartz, AJ | 1 |
Bentler, SE | 1 |
Brake, KA | 1 |
Kelly, MW | 1 |
Joliat, MJ | 1 |
Brown, EB | 1 |
Miner, CM | 1 |
Wingen, M | 1 |
Bothmer, J | 1 |
Langer, S | 1 |
Ramaekers, JG | 1 |
Phillips, KA | 1 |
Paul, MA | 1 |
Gray, GW | 1 |
Love, RJ | 1 |
Lange, M | 1 |
Marcus, RN | 1 |
McQuade, RD | 1 |
Carson, WH | 1 |
Hennicken, D | 1 |
Fava, M | 1 |
Simon, JS | 1 |
Trivedi, MH | 1 |
Thase, ME | 1 |
Berman, RM | 1 |
Andersen, G | 1 |
Vestergaard, K | 1 |
Lauritzen, L | 1 |
Borba, CP | 1 |
Henderson, DC | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression[NCT00021528] | Phase 4 | 4,000 participants | Interventional | 2001-07-31 | Completed | ||
A Study of Adjunctive Aripiprazole in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder[NCT00095758] | Phase 3 | 1,200 participants | Interventional | 2004-09-30 | Completed | ||
A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Aripiprazole Adjunctive to Antidepressant Therapy (ADT) Among Outpatients With Major Depressive Disorder Who Have Responded Inadequately to Prior ADT[NCT00683852] | Phase 3 | 225 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-09-30 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
MADRS readmission rate is defined as MADRS score<11. The 10-item Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), which measures depression severity over the past week, was completed by clinicians using an MGH structured interview. Each item is measured on a scale from 0 to 6, and the items are summed to find the total score. The total minimum score is 0 units on a scale and the total maximum score is 60 units on a scale, where higher scores indicate more severe depression. (NCT00683852)
Timeframe: 12 weeks
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Phase 1 Drug | 4 |
Phase 1 Placebo Non-Responders on Drug in Phase 2 | 8 |
Phase I Placebo | 16 |
Phase 1 Placebo Non-Responders on Placebo in Phase 2 | 4 |
The primary outcome was the difference in response rate (decrease in MADRS total score of at least 50%) using the SPCD (sequential parallel comparison design). The 10-item Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), which measures depression severity over the past week, was completed by clinicians using an MGH structured interview. Each item is measured on a scale from 0 to 6, and the items are summed to find the total score. The total minimum score is 0 units on a scale and the total maximum score is 60 units on a scale, where higher scores indicate more severe depression. (NCT00683852)
Timeframe: 12 weeks
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Phase 1 Drug | 10 |
Phase 1 Placebo Non-Responders on Drug in Phase 2 | 11 |
Phase I Placebo | 29 |
Phase 1 Placebo Non-Responders on Placebo in Phase 2 | 5 |
The CGI-S scale was administered by clinicians based on assessment of the patient's clinical status. They measured, based on history and scores on other instruments, depressive severity. It consists of one question scored on a seven-point scale (1 = normal to 7 = among the most severe), so a higher total score indicates greater depressive severity. The minimum score is 1, and the maximum score is 7. (NCT00683852)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Phase 1 Drug | -0.81 |
Phase 1 Placebo Non-Responders on Drug in Phase 2 | -0.64 |
Phase I Placebo | -0.84 |
Phase 1 Placebo Non-Responders on Placebo in Phase 2 | -0.43 |
The 10-item Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), which measures depression severity over the past week, was completed by clinicians using an MGH structured interview. Each item is measured on a scale from 0 to 6, and the items are summed to find the total score. The total minimum score is 0 units on a scale and the total maximum score is 60 units on a scale, where higher scores indicate more severe depression. (NCT00683852)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Phase 1 Drug | -8.54 |
Phase 1 Placebo Non-Responders on Drug in Phase 2 | -5.80 |
Phase I Placebo | -8.09 |
Phase 1 Placebo Non-Responders on Placebo in Phase 2 | -3.32 |
Differences in the incidence of treatment emergent AEs between the treatment groups were examined and evaluated using descriptive statistics. This analysis compared AEs between the arms that received exclusively drug throughout the study or placebo throughout the study. (NCT00683852)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks
Intervention | Patients (Number) |
---|---|
ADAPT Drug/Drug Group | 39 |
ADAPT Placebo/Placebo Group | 60 |
Differences in the incidence of treatment emergent AEs between the treatment groups were examined and evaluated using descriptive statistics. This analysis focused on placebo non-responders in phase 1 and presented them by their treatment assignment in phase 2. (NCT00683852)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks
Intervention | Patients (Number) |
---|---|
Phase 1 Placebo Non-Responders on Drug in Phase 2 | 40 |
Phase 1 Placebo Non-Responders on Placebo in Phase 2 | 44 |
Differences in the incidence of treatment emergent AEs between the treatment groups were examined and evaluated using descriptive statistics. In this analysis, AEs were summarized according to person-phase of occurrence. Each AE was attributed to the person and then to phase 1 or phase 2, depending on the initial date of onset. (NCT00683852)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks
Intervention | adverse events (Number) |
---|---|
ADAPT Drug Group | 58 |
ADAPT Placebo Group | 110 |
The SQ, a 92-item (yes/no) self-rating questionnaire, includes 4 distress and 4 well-being subscales. There are 68 items for the distress subscales and 24 items for the well-being subscales. Each item has either a Yes/No or True/False answer. For the distress symptom score, add together the following items and score 1 when the answer is Yes/True: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12, 15, 18, 20, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, 33, 34, 36, 37, 39, 41, 42, 44, 45, 47, 48, 49, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92. Minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 68. A higher score indicates more distress symptoms. For the well-being subscale score, add together the following items and score 1 when the answer is No/False: 4, 7, 9, 10, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 21, 23, 29, 31, 35, 38, 40, 43, 46, 50, 51, 71, 78, 83, 89. Minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 24. A higher score indicates more well-being. (NCT00683852)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Sum of 4 subscaled distress scores | Sum of 4 subscaled well-being scores | |
Phase 1 Drug | -9.44 | 3.71 |
Phase 1 Placebo Non-Responders on Drug in Phase 2 | -6.78 | 3.34 |
Phase 1 Placebo Non-Responders on Placebo in Phase 2 | -4.52 | 1.98 |
Phase I Placebo | -9.70 | 2.75 |
10 trials available for citalopram and Lassitude
Article | Year |
---|---|
Impact of fatigue on outcome of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment: secondary analysis of STAR*D.
Topics: Adult; Citalopram; Depressive Disorder, Major; Double-Blind Method; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Male; M | 2014 |
Citalopram reduces endotoxin-induced fatigue.
Topics: Adult; Anxiety; Behavior; Citalopram; Cytokines; Depression; Double-Blind Method; Endotoxins; Fatigu | 2011 |
Does baseline fatigue influence treatment response to reboxetine or citalopram in depression? An open label randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Citalopram; Depressive Disorder; Fatigue; Female; Follow-Up Studies; H | 2012 |
Duloxetine versus citalopram and sertraline in the treatment of poststroke depression, anxiety, and fatigue.
Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Adult; Aged; Antidepressive Agents; Anxiety; Citalopram; Depression; Dul | 2012 |
The effectiveness of citalopram for idiopathic chronic fatigue.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Chronic Disease; Citalopram; Drug Administration Schedule; Fatigue; Fatigue Syndrome, C | 2003 |
Actual driving performance and psychomotor function in healthy subjects after acute and subchronic treatment with escitalopram, mirtazapine, and placebo: a crossover trial.
Topics: Adult; Affect; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Automobile Driving; Circadian Rhythm; Citalopram; C | 2005 |
An open-label study of escitalopram in body dysmorphic disorder.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Citalopram; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Midd | 2006 |
SSRI effects on pyschomotor performance: assessment of citalopram and escitalopram on normal subjects.
Topics: Adult; Aerospace Medicine; Citalopram; Cognition; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Fatigue; | 2007 |
The efficacy and safety of aripiprazole as adjunctive therapy in major depressive disorder: a second multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Topics: Adult; Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Antidepressive Agents; Aripiprazole; Citalopram; Cyclohexanols; Depr | 2008 |
The efficacy and safety of aripiprazole as adjunctive therapy in major depressive disorder: a second multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Topics: Adult; Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Antidepressive Agents; Aripiprazole; Citalopram; Cyclohexanols; Depr | 2008 |
The efficacy and safety of aripiprazole as adjunctive therapy in major depressive disorder: a second multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Topics: Adult; Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Antidepressive Agents; Aripiprazole; Citalopram; Cyclohexanols; Depr | 2008 |
The efficacy and safety of aripiprazole as adjunctive therapy in major depressive disorder: a second multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Topics: Adult; Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Antidepressive Agents; Aripiprazole; Citalopram; Cyclohexanols; Depr | 2008 |
Effective treatment of poststroke depression with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Citalopram; Cohort Studies; Depression; D | 1994 |
6 other studies available for citalopram and Lassitude
Article | Year |
---|---|
Cognitive, Disability, and Treatment Outcome Implications of Symptom-Based Phenotyping in Late-Life Depression.
Topics: Aged; Anhedonia; Citalopram; Cognition; Depression; Escitalopram; Fatigue; Humans; Sleep Initiation | 2023 |
Competitive EDge or over the cliff?
Topics: Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Citalopram; Depression; Fatigue; Humans; Hypercalcemia; Ma | 2013 |
A rapid, Web-based method for obtaining patient views on effects and side-effects of antidepressants.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Citalopram; Cyclohexanols; Data Col | 2011 |
Reward responsiveness and fatigue in multiple sclerosis.
Topics: Adult; Anxiety; Attention; Bupropion; Citalopram; Cognition; Depression; Disability Evaluation; Diso | 2013 |
Changes in energy after switching from daily citalopram, paroxetine, or sertraline to once-weekly fluoxetine.
Topics: Citalopram; Depressive Disorder; Drug Administration Schedule; Fatigue; Fluoxetine; Humans; Paroxeti | 2004 |
Citalopram and clozapine: potential drug interaction.
Topics: Adult; Citalopram; Clozapine; Confusion; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Sched | 2000 |