ciclesonide and Bronchial-Hyperreactivity

In asthma small airways inflammation often persists despite inhaled corticosteroids therapy.. To discuss the effects of ciclesonide, a newer inhaled corticosteroid on small airways inflammation and the reliability of some biomarkers of small airways inflammation in asthma.. Evaluation of a study assessing the short-term effects of ciclesonide on small airways inflammation in patients with mild to moderate asthma.. Ciclesonide could have beneficial effects on small airways inflammation and some of the outcome measures used as efficacy endpoints could represent possible biomarkers of small airways involvement in obstructive chronic respiratory diseases.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Bronchial Hyperreactivity; Humans; Inflammation Mediators; Pilot Projects; Pregnenediones; Pulmonary Alveoli

Ciclesonide is a novel inhaled corticosteroid for the treatment of asthma, and it is important to measure the onset of effect of this therapy on airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), exhaled nitric oxide (NO), and levels of eosinophils in induced sputum.. In a randomized, double-blind, crossover study, 21 patients with mild asthma inhaled ciclesonide 320 microg (ex-actuator) qd, ciclesonide 640 microg (ex-actuator) bid, and placebo for 7 days. Exhaled NO and AHR to adenosine monophosphate (AMP), measured as the provocative concentration of AMP producing a 20% reduction in FEV1 (PC20FEV1), were assessed after inhalation on days 1, 3 and 7. Eosinophil levels in induced sputum were also measured.. Ciclesonide 320 microg qd and 640 microg bid produced significantly greater improvements in PC20FEV1 compared with placebo on day 1 (within 2.5 h), and on days 3 and 7 (all p < 0.0001). On day 3, both ciclesonide doses significantly reduced exhaled NO levels by - 17.7 parts per billion (p < 0.0001) and - 15.4 parts per billion (p < 0.003) vs placebo, respectively. Significant reductions were maintained during the study with both ciclesonide doses (p < 0.01). A nonsignificant trend towards a decrease in eosinophil cell numbers was observed after 7 days of ciclesonide treatment, especially in patients receiving the higher dose.. A single dose of ciclesonide decreased AHR to AMP and exhaled NO within 3 h, while FEV, improved at 3 days and 7 days.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Anti-Allergic Agents; Asthma; Bronchial Hyperreactivity; Bronchial Provocation Tests; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Eosinophils; Female; Humans; Leukocyte Count; Male; Nitric Oxide; Pregnenediones; Sputum

There are no data comparing the relative effects of high-dose ciclesonide (CIC) and fluticasone propionate (FP) on airway and systemic outcomes in patients with moderate persistent asthma.. We elected to evaluate the relative effects of CIC and FP on the plasma cortisol response to stimulation with human corticotropin-releasing factor (hCRF) and bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine as the primary outcome variables, in addition to secondary outcomes of overnight 10-h urinary cortisol (OUC) levels, exhaled nitric oxide levels, lung function, symptoms, and quality of life.. Fourteen patients with moderate persistent asthma (mean FEV(1), 67% predicted [prior to each randomized treatment]) completed the study, which had a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover design, per protocol. Patients stopped receiving their usual inhaled corticosteroids for the duration of the study and instead began receiving salmeterol, 50 mug twice daily, and montelukast, 10 mg once daily, for the 2-week washout periods prior to each randomized treatment, in order to prevent dropouts after withdrawal from inhaled corticosteroid therapy. Patients received 4 weeks of either CIC, 200 microg ex-valve (160 microg ex-actuator) four puffs twice daily, plus FP-placebo, four puffs twice daily, or FP, 250 microg ex-valve (220 microg ex-actuator) four puffs twice daily, plus CIC-placebo, four puffs twice daily. Salmeterol and montelukast were withheld for 72 h prior to each postwashout baseline visit, and CIC or FP was withheld for 12 h prior to each posttreatment visit.. FP, but not CIC, when compared to respective baseline values, significantly suppressed (p < 0.05) plasma cortisol levels as follows: FP prior to receiving hCRF: geometric mean fold difference, 1.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1 to 1.3; CIC prior to receiving hCRF: geometric mean fold difference, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.0; FP 30 min after receiving hCRF: geometric mean fold difference, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.3; CIC 30 min after receiving hCRF: geometric mean fold difference, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.2; OUC after FP administration: geometric mean fold difference, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.6; OUC after CIC administration: geometric mean fold difference, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.5. There was also a significantly lower (p < 0.05) mean value for OUC levels after FP administration than after CIC administration (geometric mean fold difference, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.0). Therapy with CIC and FP, compared to respective baselines, significantly increased (p < 0.05) the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV(1), as follows: CIC: doubling dilution difference, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.1 to 1.6; FP: doubling dilution difference, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.1 to 2.0. It also significantly reduced (p < 0.05) exhaled nitric oxide levels, as follows: CIC: geometric mean fold difference, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.3; FP: geometric mean fold difference, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3 to 2.8. There was no effect on other secondary efficacy outcomes.. FP, 2,000 microg daily, but not CIC, 1,600 microg daily, significantly suppressed hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis outcomes, with OUC levels being lower after FP administration than after CIC administration. Both drugs significantly improved airway outcomes in terms of methacholine bronchial hyperresponsiveness and exhaled nitric oxide levels. The present results would therefore suggest that CIC might confer a better therapeutic ratio than FP when used at higher doses.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Androstadienes; Asthma; Breath Tests; Bronchial Hyperreactivity; Bronchial Provocation Tests; Bronchodilator Agents; Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fluticasone; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Male; Methacholine Chloride; Middle Aged; Nitric Oxide; Peak Expiratory Flow Rate; Pregnenediones; Quality of Life; Spirometry

The efficacy and systemic effects of ciclesonide, a novel glucocorticosteroid, inhaled via pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) were compared with fluticasone propionate pMDI in 26 patients with asthma, using a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, double dummy, 6-period crossover study design. Treatments were placebo, ciclesonide 320 microg (ex-actuator dose) once daily (o.d.), ciclesonide 640 microg o.d., ciclesonide 640 microg twice daily (b.i.d.), fluticasone propionate 440 microg (ex-actuator dose) b.i.d., and fluticasone propionate 880 microg b.i.d. The primary variable was area under the plasma cortisol concentration-time curve over 24 h (plasma cortisol AUC(0-24), relative to placebo) derived from samples taken every 2 h, on the 9th day of treatment. Secondary variables were 24-h urinary cortisol excretion and PC20 for adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) (relative to placebo and expressed in doubling concentrations). Ciclesonide did not affect 24-h cortisol secretion. Fluticasone propionate suppressed cortisol secretion as demonstrated by a decrease in plasma cortisol AUC(0-24), relative to placebo, by 29% (95% CI 15-41) and 59% (95% CI 51-66) with 440 and 880 microg b.i.d., respectively. PC20 more than doubled with each active treatment, but no statistically significant dose-response effect could be established. It was concluded that moderate to high doses of fluticasone propionate suppressed cortisol secretion, that ciclesonide did not suppress cortisol secretion, and that all active treatments decreased hyperresponsiveness to AMP.

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Administration, Inhalation; Adolescent; Adult; Androstadienes; Area Under Curve; Asthma; Bronchial Hyperreactivity; Bronchodilator Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluticasone; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Lung; Male; Middle Aged; Pregnenediones; Spirometry; Treatment Outcome

There are no data comparing the relative efficacy of hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) formulations of ciclesonide (CIC) and fluticasone propionate (FP) on airway hyper-responsiveness, in mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. We therefore elected to evaluate the comparative efficacy of HFA pressurized metered-dose inhaler formulations of CIC and FP, assessing methacholine challenge, in addition to exhaled nitric oxide, lung function, diary cards and quality of life.. Nineteen mild-to-moderate asthmatic patients completed the study per protocol in randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover fashion. Patients were required to stop their usual inhaled corticosteroid therapy for the duration of the study. Patients were commenced instead on salmeterol (SM) 50 microg one puff twice daily + montelukast (ML) 10 mg once daily for 2-week washout periods prior to each randomized treatment, in order to prevent dropouts. Patients received 4 weeks of either CIC 200 microg two puffs once daily (08.00 h) + CIC-placebo (PL) two puffs once daily (20.00 h) + FP-PL two puffs twice daily (08.00 h and 20.00 h), or FP 125 microg two puffs twice daily (08.00 h and 20.00 h) + CIC-PL two puffs twice daily (08.00 h and 20.00 h). SM + ML were withheld for 72 h prior to post-washout visits and CIC or FP was withheld for 24 h prior to study visits.. There was no significant difference between CIC vs. FP for the primary outcome of methacholine PC20 as doubling dilution (dd) shift from respective baseline; mean difference: 0.4 dd (95% CI -0.4, 1.2). Moreover, there was no difference between treatments for the sequence of CIC first vs FP second; mean difference: 0.2 dd (95% CI -1.3, 1.7) or FP first vs CIC second; mean difference: 0.9 dd (95% CI -0.1, 1.8). There were also no differences for other secondary outcomes between treatments, either respective or irrespective of sequence, as change from baseline.. There were no differences between 4 weeks of CIC 400 microg once daily and FP 250 microg twice daily on methacholine hyper-responsiveness in mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. Longer-term studies are indicated to evaluate their relative efficacy on asthma exacerbations.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Androstadienes; Asthma; Bronchial Hyperreactivity; Bronchial Provocation Tests; Bronchoconstrictor Agents; Bronchodilator Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fluticasone; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Hydrocarbons, Fluorinated; Male; Methacholine Chloride; Middle Aged; Pregnenediones; Vital Capacity