chromazurol-b and Bone-Diseases

In this study, the sensitivity of the aurine tricarboxylic acid (ATA) and acid solochrome azurine (ASA) stain for aluminum were compared under special consideration of the relationship to bone histology in renal osteodystrophy. Al deposition in iliac crest bone biopsies taken from 78 patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) was assessed histochemically using the ATA and ASA stain; the Al accumulation was correlated with bone histology and histomorphometry. Significantly more Al was detectable with the ASA method on trabecular bone surfaces and cement lines (18 +/- 20% vs 4 +/- 12% on surfaces; 13 +/- 18% vs 0.4 +/- 1.3% on cement lines). In 31 cases in which ATA yielded negative results, ASA in contrast indicated Al deposits on up to 20% of the trabecular bone surface. The specimens with more Al on the trabecular bone surface had a significantly higher osteoid volume and osteoid surface. With ATA, these differences were observed at a staining of > or = 10% of the trabecular surface, with ASA at a staining of > or = 40% of the trabecular surface. Therefore, it seems to be possible to detect a very low Al deposition, without any Al-induced changes in bone morphology or signs of Al toxicity in the bone using the ASA method. By contrast, a positive ATA stain is mainly found in biopsies with typical signs of Al-induced changes of histomorphometric bone parameters. We, therefore, recommend the routine use of the ASA stain to detect Al deposition in bone.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aluminum; Aurintricarboxylic Acid; Benzoates; Biopsy; Bone and Bones; Bone Diseases; Female; Germany; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Middle Aged; Osteoblasts; Renal Dialysis; Retrospective Studies; Spectrophotometry, Atomic; Staining and Labeling; Statistics as Topic; Time Factors

Fourteen individuals on long term hemodialysis, with varying amounts of aluminum in bone from 11 to 296 mg/kg by flameless atomic absorption spectrophotometry, were examined to see whether the aluminon or acid solochrome azurine (ASA) staining reactions best approximated the chemical determination. Correlation coefficients were 0.78 for aluminon and 0.88 for ASA. Together with 11 additional patients morphometric parameters were compared with the two aluminum stains. The aluminon stain gave satisfactory results in the osteomalacic group but underestimated the amount of aluminum present in those with hyperparathyroid, mixed or aplastic disease. Some individuals showed a striking difference between the two techniques which could have led to an erroneous conclusion regarding the amount of aluminum present. The aluminon stain was pH dependent and together with ASA could be enhanced by prior heat treatment of the sections. It is recommended that ASA either replace aluminon for routine use or be used together with the aluminon stain, particularly for bones without osteomalacia or with mild to moderate aluminum storage.

Topics: Aluminum; Aurintricarboxylic Acid; Benzoates; Bone and Bones; Bone Diseases; Histological Techniques; Humans; Renal Dialysis; Staining and Labeling