cholecalciferol and Low-Back-Pain

Although vitamin D is one of the essential nutrients associated with musculoskeletal system function, there is no standard treatment method for vitamin D deficiency. This study aimed to investigate the effects of vitamin D supplementation on the improvement in symptoms, functional recovery of the spine, and changes in the quality of life in patients with spinal stenosis.. In this prospective study, patients with spinal stenosis and serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels < 10 ng/mL were randomly assigned to a supplementation group (Group S) and a non-supplementation group (Group NS): 26 participants in Group S (16 females and 10 males) and 25 in Group NS (15 females and 10 males). The degree of lower back pain in both groups was assessed using the visual analog scale; spine function was assessed using the Oswestry disability index and Roland-Morris disability questionnaire; and patient quality of life was assessed using the 36-item short form health survey. We compared and analyzed the values that were measured at baseline, between 4 and 6 weeks (V1), 10 and 12 weeks (V2), and 22 and 26 weeks (V3).. No statistically significant difference was observed in lower back pain, spine function, or quality of life between both groups at baseline. In terms of lower back pain in V1, Group S scored 4.15 ± 3.12, while Group NS scored 5.64 ± 1.85 (P = .045). In V2, Group S scored 3.15 ± 2.38, while Group NS scored 4.52 ± 1.87 (P = .027). Moreover, in V3, Group S scored 3.58 ± 1.65, while Group NS scored 4.60 ± 1.68 (P = .033), indicating a statistically significant improvement in each period.. If a vitamin D deficiency that does not require surgical treatment exists in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, high-dose vitamin D injections can improve lower back pain, which is the main symptom of lumbar spinal stenosis, as well as the functional outcomes of the spine and quality of life.

Topics: Cholecalciferol; Dietary Supplements; Female; Humans; Low Back Pain; Lumbar Vertebrae; Male; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Spinal Stenosis; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin D Deficiency

Nonspecific low back pain is known as one of the most common reasons for chronic low back pain (CLBP) that burdens healthcare systems with high costs. According to a hypothesis, CLBP has been associated with vitamin D3 deficiency, the goal of this study is to evaluate the effect of vitamin D3 administration on improvements in CLBP.. This double blind randomized clinical trial included 53 patients aged between 18-40 years with nonspecific CLBP. Pain was measured using the pain visual analogue scale score (VAS), and serum 25-OH-vitamin D level was measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. The patients were randomly divided into two groups based on sex and weight. Pearl of vitamin D(3) (50 000 IU) or placebo was administered orally every week for 8 weeks. Data were analyzed via SPSS 17th edition software using two-tailed paired t-test and chi-square test.. There were 26 and 27 patients in drug and placebo groups respectively. Out of 53 subjects, 75.47% were female. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean age, sex, and mean weight between the two groups. The mean serum 25-OH-vitamin D level was 18.86 ± 9.24 nmol/L on the first visit. After 8 weeks of intervention, the mean serum 25-OH-vitamin D level changed from 17.88 ± 9.04 to 27.52 ± 9.04 (P = 0.043) and from 19.81 ± 9.60 to 18.91 ± 7.84 (P = 0.248) in drug and placebo groups, respectively. The mean VAS score for pain decreased from 5.42 ± 1.65 to 3.03 ± 3.14 (P = 0.001) and from 6.42 ± 1.62 to 3.11 ± 3.08 (P = 0.001) among drug and placebo groups, respectively. The mean changes in chronic pain were 2.38 ± 2.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.32-3.44 in the drug group and 3.33 ± 3.67, 95%CI = 0.61-2.55 in the placebo group. No significant statistical difference between the two groups was observed.. According to our results, both vitamin D(3) and placebo treatments improved CLBP and there was no significant difference between vitamin D(3) and placebo groups.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Biomarkers; Chi-Square Distribution; Cholecalciferol; Dietary Supplements; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Female; Humans; Iran; Low Back Pain; Male; Pain Measurement; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin D; Vitamin D Deficiency; Young Adult

Vitamin D is important for bone metabolism and neuromuscular function. While a routine dosage is often proposed in osteoporotic patients, it is not so evident in rheumatology outpatients where it has been shown that the prevalence of hypovitaminosis D is high. The aim of the current study was to systematically evaluate the vitamin D status in our outpatient rheumatology population to define the severity of the problem according to rheumatologic diseases. During November 2009, all patients were offered a screening test for 25-OH vitamin D levels and categorised as deficient (<10 µg/l [ng/ml] [25 nmol/l]), insufficient (10 µg/l to 30 µg/l [25 to 75 nmol/l]) or normal (>30 µg/l [75 nmol/l]). A total of 272 patients were included. The mean 25-OH vitamin D level was 21 µg/l (range 1.5 to 45.9). A total of 20 patients had vitamin D deficiency, 215 patients had an insufficiency and 37 patients had normal results. In the group of patients with osteoporosis mean level of 25-OH vitamin D was 25 µg/l and 31% had normal results. In patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (N = 219), the mean level of 25-OH vitamin D was 20.5 µg/l, and only 12% had normal 25-OH vitamin D levels. In the small group of patients with degenerative disease (N = 33), the mean level of 25-OH vitamin D was 21.8 µg/l, and 21% had normal results. Insufficiency and deficiency were even seen in 38% of the patients who were taking supplements. These results confirm that hypovitaminosis D is highly prevalent in an outpatient population of rheumatology patients, affecting 86% of subjects. Despite oral supplementation (taken in 38% of our population), only a quarter of those on oral supplementation attained normal values of 25-OH vitamin D.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cholecalciferol; Chronic Disease; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dietary Supplements; Female; Humans; Low Back Pain; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Male; Middle Aged; Osteoporosis; Prevalence; Rheumatic Diseases; Switzerland; Vitamin D; Vitamin D Deficiency

Topics: Adult; Cholecalciferol; Diagnosis, Differential; Diagnostic Imaging; Female; Humans; Low Back Pain; Osteoporosis; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Pregnancy Trimester, Third