chlorantranilipole and Body-Weight

Spodoptera frugiperda is an economically important agricultural pest and poses a serious threat to food security globally. Its management is gravely challenged by its high polyphagous nature, strong migratory ability, and massive fecundity. Chlorantraniliprole (CHL) is widely utilized in controlling S. frugiperda, its intensive application and over-reliance pose adverse health risks, development of resistance, toxicity to beneficial insects, natural enemies, and environmental contamination. To address S. frugiperda resistance to CHL and its inherent challenges, this study explores the synergistic effects of camptothecin (CPT) with CHL in its management. The binary mixed adversely induced the larvae weight and mortality when compared to single-treated. CHL + CPT (1:20 mg/L) had the highest larvae mortality of (73.80 %) with a high antagonistic factor (0.90), while (1:10 mg/L) with (66.10%) mortality exhibited a high synergistic factor (1.43). Further, CHL + CPT (1:10 mg/L) considerably altered the midgut epithelial cell, peritrophic membrane, microvilli, basement membrane, and regenerative cells. For biochemical analysis, CHL + CPT (1:10 mg/L) significantly decreased glutathione-S-transferase (1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene CDNB) and cytochrome P450 (7-ethoxycoumarin O-deethylation) activities in the midgut in a dose and time dependent manner. Based on RNA-Seq analysis, a total of 4,373 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified from the three treatments. CPT vs CK (Control) had 1694 (968 up-, 726 down-regulated), CHL vs CK with 1771 (978 up-, 793 down-regulated), and CHL + CPT vs CK had 908 (394 up-, 514 down-regulated) DEGs. The enrichment analysis disclosed significant pathways such as metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P450, glutathione metabolism, TOLL and IMD (Immune Deficiency) signaling pathway, longevity regulating pathway. This study provides basis to expatiate on the molecular toxicological mechanism of CHL + CPT in management of fall armyworm.

Topics: Animals; Body Weight; Camptothecin; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Drug Synergism; Food Security; Gene Expression Profiling; Gene Ontology; Glutathione Transferase; Insecticides; Larva; Reproducibility of Results; RNA-Seq; Secondary Metabolism; Spodoptera

Maintaining bee-friendly habitats in cities and suburbs can help conserve the vital pollination services of declining bee populations. Despite label precautions not to apply them to blooming plants, neonicotinoids and other residual systemic insecticides may be applied for preventive control of lawn insect pests when spring-flowering weeds are present. Dietary exposure to neonicotinoids adversely affects bees, but the extent of hazard from field usage is controversial. We exposed colonies of the bumble bee Bombus impatiens to turf with blooming white clover that had been treated with clothianidin, a neonicotinoid, or with chlorantraniliprole, the first anthranilic diamide labeled for use on lawns. The sprays were applied at label rate and lightly irrigated. After residues had dried, colonies were confined to forage for six days, and then moved to a non-treated rural site to openly forage and develop. Colonies exposed to clothianidin-treated weedy turf had delayed weight gain and produced no new queens whereas those exposed to chlorantraniliprole-treated plots developed normally compared with controls. Neither bumble bees nor honey bees avoided foraging on treated white clover in open plots. Nectar from clover blooms directly contaminated by spray residues contained 171±44 ppb clothianidin. Notably, neither insecticide adversely impacted bee colonies confined on the treated turf after it had been mown to remove clover blooms present at the time of treatment, and new blooms had formed. Our results validate EPA label precautionary statements not to apply neonicotinoids to blooming nectar-producing plants if bees may visit the treatment area. Whatever systemic hazard through lawn weeds they may pose appears transitory, however, and direct hazard can be mitigated by adhering to label precautions, or if blooms inadvertently are contaminated, by mowing to remove them. Chlorantraniliprole usage on lawns appears non-hazardous to bumble bees.

Topics: Analysis of Variance; Animals; Bees; Body Weight; Feeding Behavior; Guanidines; Insecticides; Kentucky; Medicago; Neonicotinoids; ortho-Aminobenzoates; Plant Nectar; Plant Weeds; Reproduction; Thiazoles