cgp-39393 and Angina--Unstable

cgp-39393 has been researched along with Angina--Unstable* in 4 studies

Reviews

1 review(s) available for cgp-39393 and Angina--Unstable

ArticleYear
Anticoagulation for acute coronary syndromes: from heparin to direct thrombin inhibitors.
    Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2007, Volume: 8 Suppl 3

    The anticoagulant properties of heparin were discovered in 1916, and by the 1930s researchers were evaluating its therapeutic use in clinical trials. Treatment of unstable angina with unfractionated heparin (UFH), in addition to aspirin, was introduced into clinical practice in the early 1980s. UFH was combined with aspirin to suppress thrombin propagation and fibrin formation in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, UFH stimulates platelets, leading to both activation and aggregation, which may further promote clot formation. Clinical trials have demonstrated that newer agents, such as the low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), are superior to UFH for medical management of unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Increasingly, the LMWHs have been used as the anticoagulant of choice for patients presenting with ACS. For patients undergoing PCI, LMWH provides no sub-stantial benefit over UFH for anticoagulation; however, direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) have demonstrated safety and efficacy in this setting. UFH is likely to be replaced by more effective and safer antithrombin agents, such as DTIs. DTIs have antiplatelet effects, anticoagulant action, and most do not bind to plasma proteins, thereby providing a more consistent dose-response effect than UFH. The FDA has approved 4 parenteral DTIs for various indications: lepirudin, argatroban, bivalirudin, and desirudin. The antiplatelet, anticoagulant, and pharmacokinetic properties of bivalirudin support its use as the anticoagulant of choice for both lower- and higher-risk patients, including those undergoing PCI.

    Topics: Acute Disease; Angina Pectoris; Angina, Unstable; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Anticoagulants; Arginine; Fondaparinux; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Hirudins; Humans; Models, Molecular; Molecular Structure; Myocardial Ischemia; Peptide Fragments; Pipecolic Acids; Platelet Activation; Polysaccharides; Recombinant Proteins; Sulfonamides; Syndrome; Thrombin; Thrombosis

2007

Trials

2 trial(s) available for cgp-39393 and Angina--Unstable

ArticleYear
Distinct effects of recombinant desulfatohirudin (Revasc) and heparin on plasma levels of fibrinopeptide A and prothrombin fragment F1.2 in unstable angina. A multicenter trial.
    Circulation, 1996, Nov-15, Volume: 94, Issue:10

    Thrombin plays an important role in the pathogenesis of acute coronary thrombosis. We studied the effects of a direct thrombin inhibitor, recombinant desulfatohirudin, and heparin on plasma levels (at 0, 4, 12, and 24 hours) of fibrinopeptide A (FPA), which reflects thrombin action, and prothrombin fragment F1.2, which reflects thrombin generation, in patients with unstable angina.. Patients were randomized to one of two doses of heparin (n = 50) (target activated partial thromboplastin time, 65 to 90 seconds or 90 to 110 seconds) or one of four doses of r-hirudin (n = 113) (0.05, 0.10, 0.20, or 0.30 mg.kg-1.h-1 by infusion). r-Hirudin induced a dose-dependent decline in plasma FPA. At 24 hours, FPA levels with 0.1- to 0.3-mg.kg-1.h-1 r-hirudin regimens were significantly lower than with 0.05 mg.kg-1.h-1 r-hirudin; levels with 0.1- to 0.2-mg.kg-1.h-1 r-hirudin regimens were lower than with both heparin regimens. Plasma F1.2 did not decline significantly during therapy with heparin or hirudin except at 0.3 mg.kg-1.h-1 hirudin. At 24 hours, they were higher with the 0.05-mg.kg-1.h-1 r-hirudin regimen than with other regimens. For comparable levels of thrombin generation (F1.2 levels), FPA levels were higher in heparin patients than in hirudin patients. For the same FPA values, the corresponding F1.2 values were higher in the hirudin group.. Our findings provide evidence for distinct in vivo effects of the two agents and suggest that r-hirudin is a relatively more potent inhibitor of thrombin action but a less effective inhibitor of thrombin generation than heparin. The lower FPA levels in hirudin patients may reflect its ability to inactivate clot-bound thrombin. The relative clinical efficacies of the two agents need to be defined by clinical trials in progress.

    Topics: Angina, Unstable; Antithrombin III; Coronary Angiography; Fibrinolytic Agents; Fibrinopeptide A; Heparin; Hirudin Therapy; Hirudins; Humans; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Peptide Fragments; Peptide Hydrolases; Prothrombin; Recombinant Proteins

1996
Recombinant hirudin for unstable angina pectoris. A multicenter, randomized angiographic trial.
    Circulation, 1994, Volume: 89, Issue:4

    Coronary artery thrombosis plays an important pathophysiological role in unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. To date, heparin and thrombolytic therapy has not provided complete or consistent benefit. We hypothesized that recombinant hirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, would prevent accumulation of coronary artery thrombus in a manner superior to heparin.. Patients with rest ischemic pain, abnormal ECG, and baseline angiogram indicating a > or = 60% stenosis of a culprit coronary artery or saphenous vein graft with visual appearance of thrombus were randomized to one of two different doses of heparin (either a target activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT] of 65 to 90 or 90 to 110 seconds) or one of four doses of hirudin (0.05, 0.10, 0.20, or 0.30 mg.kg-1.h-1 infusion) in a dose-escalating protocol. After 72 to 120 hours of study drug, a repeat coronary angiogram was obtained, and the paired studies underwent quantitative analysis. The primary end point was change in the average cross-sectional area of the culprit lesion. Other efficacy end points also involved changes in culprit lesion dimensions and TIMI flow grade. Recombinant hirudin led to a dose-dependent elevation of aPTT that appeared to plateau at the 0.2-mg/kg dose. A higher proportion of hirudin-treated patients had their aPTT within a 40-second range (16% heparin versus 71% hirudin, P < .001). Overall, the 116 patients treated with hirudin tended to show more improvement than the 50 patients receiving heparin relative to the primary efficacy variable--the average cross-sectional area (P = .08)--as well as minimal cross-sectional area (P = .028), minimal luminal diameter (P = .029), and percent diameter stenosis (P = .07).. Recombinant hirudin appears to be a promising antithrombotic intervention compared with heparin for inhibition of coronary artery thrombus. Large-scale comparative trials are warranted.

    Topics: Angina, Unstable; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Thrombosis; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Heparin; Hirudin Therapy; Hirudins; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Recombinant Proteins

1994

Other Studies

1 other study(ies) available for cgp-39393 and Angina--Unstable

ArticleYear
Comparison of benefits and complications of hirudin versus heparin for patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention.
    The American journal of cardiology, 2001, Dec-15, Volume: 88, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Angina, Unstable; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiac Catheterization; Female; Heparin; Hirudin Therapy; Hirudins; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Ischemia; Recombinant Proteins; Secondary Prevention; Syndrome

2001