Page last updated: 2024-10-24

cetirizine and Sneezing

cetirizine has been researched along with Sneezing in 15 studies

Cetirizine: A potent second-generation histamine H1 antagonist that is effective in the treatment of allergic rhinitis, chronic urticaria, and pollen-induced asthma. Unlike many traditional antihistamines, it does not cause drowsiness or anticholinergic side effects.
cetirizine : A member of the class of piperazines that is piperazine in which the hydrogens attached to nitrogen are replaced by a (4-chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methyl and a 2-(carboxymethoxy)ethyl group respectively.

Sneezing: The sudden, forceful, involuntary expulsion of air from the NOSE and MOUTH caused by irritation to the MUCOUS MEMBRANES of the upper RESPIRATORY TRACT.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" However from 22 to 24 h after the first dose cetirizine was significantly superior to fexofenadine for the major symptom complex score and for sneezing."5.09Controlled comparison of the efficacy and safety of cetirizine 10 mg o.d. and fexofenadine 120 mg o.d. in reducing symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis. ( Burtin, B; De Vos, C; Donnelly, F; Horak, F; Kavina, A; Stübner, P; Zieglmayer, R, 2001)
" and intracerebroventricular pentobarbital-induced sedation and alcohol-induced ataxia models."3.76Characterization of anti-inflammatory properties and evidence for no sedation liability for the novel antihistamine SUN-1334H. ( Bagad, AS; Bahekar, PC; Chidrewar, GU; Mandhane, SN; Mehetre, SV; Pawar, CA; Rajamannar, T; Rao, CT; Shah, JH, 2010)
"Levocetirizine was as effective in control of high and low symptoms except for time to achieve maximum effect (2 days versus 1 week, respectively, p = 0."2.75Clinical assessment of levocetirizine and budesonide in treatment of persistent allergic rhinitis regarding to symptom severity. ( Boonkitticharoen, V; Kulapaditharom, B; Pornprasertsuk, K, 2010)
"Levocetirizine treatment also correlated with a significant increase in the percentage of CD4+CD25+ T cells (P<0."2.73Levocetirizine modulates lymphocyte activation in patients with allergic rhinitis. ( Arifhodzic, N; Haines, D; Mahmoud, F; Novotney, L, 2008)
"Japanese cedar pollinosis, a common disease with morbidity of approximately 20% in the Japanese population, is characterized by subjectively irritating symptoms during an annual 3-month period."2.71The efficacy of short-term administration of 3 antihistamines vs placebo under natural exposure to Japanese cedar pollen. ( Fujieda, S; Hyo, S; Kawada, R; Kitazawa, S; Takenaka, H, 2005)
"Cetirizine was significantly more effective at reducing the mean rhinorrhea score compared with oxatomide for both weeks 8 and 12 (P < 0."2.70The comparison of the efficacy and safety of cetirizine, oxatomide, ketotifen, and a placebo for the treatment of childhood perennial allergic rhinitis. ( Hsieh, JC; Lai, DS; Lee, HS; Lin, KL; Lue, KH, 2002)
"Sneezing was also attenuated by both levocetirizine and cetirizine."2.70Effect of cetirizine, levocetirizine, and dextrocetirizine on histamine-induced nasal response in healthy adult volunteers. ( Clement, P; De Vos, C; Hanotte, F; Wang, DY, 2001)
"Montelukast has not been reported to have major effects on sneezing and itching in the clinic but reduces nasal obstruction (lower nasal airway pressure or nasal patency)."1.35Differential responses to various classes of drugs in a model of allergic rhinitis in guinea pigs. ( Al Suleimani, YM; Dong, Y; Walker, MJ, 2008)

Research

Studies (15)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19901 (6.67)18.7374
1990's2 (13.33)18.2507
2000's9 (60.00)29.6817
2010's3 (20.00)24.3611
2020's0 (0.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Kitayama-Sugiyama, C1
Mochizuki, N1
Murata, H1
Katsura, M1
Kamei, C3
Yokota, E1
Kuyama, S1
Sugimoto, Y2
Ogawa, M1
Mahmoud, F1
Arifhodzic, N1
Haines, D1
Novotney, L1
Mandhane, SN1
Shah, JH1
Bahekar, PC1
Mehetre, SV1
Pawar, CA1
Bagad, AS1
Chidrewar, GU1
Rao, CT1
Rajamannar, T1
Kulapaditharom, B1
Pornprasertsuk, K1
Boonkitticharoen, V1
Kayasuga, R1
Watanabe, T1
Lai, DS1
Lue, KH1
Hsieh, JC1
Lin, KL1
Lee, HS1
Ciprandi, G1
Tosca, MA1
Milanese, M1
Schenone, G1
Ricca, V1
Hyo, S1
Fujieda, S1
Kawada, R1
Kitazawa, S1
Takenaka, H1
Al Suleimani, YM1
Dong, Y1
Walker, MJ1
Naclerio, RM2
Day, JH1
Briscoe, MP1
Clark, RH1
Ellis, AK1
Gervais, P1
Wang, DY1
Hanotte, F1
De Vos, C2
Clement, P1
Horak, F1
Stübner, P1
Zieglmayer, R1
Kavina, A1
Burtin, B1
Donnelly, F1
Proud, D1
Kagey-Sobotka, A1
Freidhoff, L1
Norman, PS1
Lichtenstein, LM1

Clinical Trials (2)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
The Addition of Montelukast to Fluticasone in the Treatment of Perennial Allergic Rhinitis[NCT00119015]Phase 4102 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Terminated (stopped due to Difficulty in recruitment)
A Placebo Controlled Trial to Evaluate The Effects of Levocetirizine on Nasal Allergen Challenge And Adenosine Monophosphate Challenge In Patients With Intermittent and Persistent Allergic Rhinitis[NCT00679250]Phase 425 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change From Baseline in Other Symptom Score Over 2 Week Randomized Treatment Period

"Patients recorded the severity of other symptoms, including itchy nose/eyes and post-nasal drip, twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The other symptom score was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 6.~The baseline symptom score used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast-0.24
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo-0.14

Change From Baseline in Runny Nose Symptom Score Over 2 Week Randomized Treatment Period

"Patients recorded the severity of runny nose twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The runny nose symptom score was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 6.~The baseline symptom score used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast-0.52
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo-0.29

Change From Baseline in Sneezing Symptom Score Over 2 Week Randomized Treatment Period

"Patients recorded the severity of sneezing twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The sneezing symptom score was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 6.~The baseline symptom score used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast-0.22
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo-0.25

Change From Baseline in Stuffy Nose Symptom Score Over 2 Week Randomized Treatment Period

"Patients recorded the severity of stuffy nose twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The stuffy nose symptom score was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 6.~The baseline symptom score used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast-0.41
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo-0.47

Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Over 2 Week Randomized Treatment Period

"Patients recorded the severity of sneezing, runny nose, stuffy nose, and other symptoms (itchy nose/eyes and post-nasal drip) twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The TNSS was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 24.~The baseline TNSS used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast-1.66
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo-2.21

Trials

10 trials available for cetirizine and Sneezing

ArticleYear
Levocetirizine modulates lymphocyte activation in patients with allergic rhinitis.
    Journal of pharmacological sciences, 2008, Volume: 108, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Cetirizine; Eosinophils; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Seda

2008
Clinical assessment of levocetirizine and budesonide in treatment of persistent allergic rhinitis regarding to symptom severity.
    Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet, 2010, Volume: 93, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Area Under Curve; Budesonide; Cetirizine; Female; Histamine H

2010
The comparison of the efficacy and safety of cetirizine, oxatomide, ketotifen, and a placebo for the treatment of childhood perennial allergic rhinitis.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2002, Volume: 89, Issue:6

    Topics: Allergens; Animals; Anti-Allergic Agents; Blood Proteins; Cetirizine; Child; Conjunctivitis, Allergi

2002
Antihistamines added to an antileukotriene in treating seasonal allergic rhinitis: histamine and leukotriene antagonism.
    European annals of allergy and clinical immunology, 2004, Volume: 36, Issue:2

    Topics: Acetates; Adolescent; Adult; Asthma; Cetirizine; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Synergism;

2004
The efficacy of short-term administration of 3 antihistamines vs placebo under natural exposure to Japanese cedar pollen.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2005, Volume: 94, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Cetirizine; Cryptomeria; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Histamine

2005
The effect of antihistamines on the immediate allergic response: a comparative review.
    Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 1993, Volume: 108, Issue:6

    Topics: Capillary Permeability; Cetirizine; Cyproheptadine; Diphenhydramine; Double-Blind Method; Histamine

1993
Onset of action and efficacy of terfenadine, astemizole, cetirizine, and loratadine for the relief of symptoms of allergic rhinitis.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 1997, Volume: 79, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Allergic Agents; Astemizole; Cetirizine; Double-Blind Method; Environmental

1997
Effect of cetirizine, levocetirizine, and dextrocetirizine on histamine-induced nasal response in healthy adult volunteers.
    Allergy, 2001, Volume: 56, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Airway Resistance; Cetirizine; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine; Hi

2001
Controlled comparison of the efficacy and safety of cetirizine 10 mg o.d. and fexofenadine 120 mg o.d. in reducing symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    International archives of allergy and immunology, 2001, Volume: 125, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Allergic Agents; Bronchial Provocation Tests; Cetirizine; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Bli

2001
The effect of cetirizine on early allergic response.
    The Laryngoscope, 1989, Volume: 99, Issue:6 Pt 1

    Topics: Albumins; Antigens; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Double-Blind Method; Histamine; Histamine

1989

Other Studies

5 other studies available for cetirizine and Sneezing

ArticleYear
Attenuation of histamine-induced airway effects by intranasal application of levocetirizine in mice.
    Immunopharmacology and immunotoxicology, 2013, Volume: 35, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Animals; Cetirizine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Histamine; Histam

2013
Participation of histamine H3 receptors in experimental allergic rhinitis of mice.
    Journal of pharmacological sciences, 2008, Volume: 108, Issue:2

    Topics: Animals; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Chemotaxis, Leukocyte; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Respo

2008
Characterization of anti-inflammatory properties and evidence for no sedation liability for the novel antihistamine SUN-1334H.
    International archives of allergy and immunology, 2010, Volume: 151, Issue:1

    Topics: Acetates; Alcohols; Anaphylaxis; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Ataxia; Cetirizin

2010
Participation of chemical mediators other than histamine in nasal allergy signs: a study using mice lacking histamine H(1) receptors.
    European journal of pharmacology, 2002, Aug-09, Volume: 449, Issue:3

    Topics: Animals; Anti-Allergic Agents; Antigens; Behavior, Animal; Carbazoles; Cetirizine; Dose-Response Rel

2002
Differential responses to various classes of drugs in a model of allergic rhinitis in guinea pigs.
    Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2008, Volume: 21, Issue:2

    Topics: Acetates; Acute Disease; Animals; Cetirizine; Cyclopropanes; Dexamethasone; Disease Models, Animal;

2008