Page last updated: 2024-10-24

cetirizine and Nasal Obstruction

cetirizine has been researched along with Nasal Obstruction in 24 studies

Cetirizine: A potent second-generation histamine H1 antagonist that is effective in the treatment of allergic rhinitis, chronic urticaria, and pollen-induced asthma. Unlike many traditional antihistamines, it does not cause drowsiness or anticholinergic side effects.
cetirizine : A member of the class of piperazines that is piperazine in which the hydrogens attached to nitrogen are replaced by a (4-chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methyl and a 2-(carboxymethoxy)ethyl group respectively.

Nasal Obstruction: Any hindrance to the passage of air into and out of the nose. The obstruction may be unilateral or bilateral, and may involve any part of the NASAL CAVITY.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Levocetirizine treatment induced significant symptom relief (P=0."6.71Levocetirizine improves nasal obstruction and modulates cytokine pattern in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis: a pilot study. ( Ciprandi, G; Cirillo, I; Tosca, MA; Vizzaccaro, A, 2004)
"Nasal obstruction is the main symptom in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis."6.71Desloratadine and levocetirizine improve nasal symptoms, airflow, and allergic inflammation in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis: a pilot study. ( Allen, M; Barberi, S; Ciprandi, G; Cirillo, I; Civardi, E; Marseglia, GL; Vizzaccaro, A, 2005)
"Nasal obstruction is a difficult-to-treat symptom."6.43Pathophysiology of nasal obstruction and meta-analysis of early and late effects of levocetirizine. ( Bachert, C; De Smedt, H; Patou, J; van Cauwenberge, P, 2006)
"Twenty-one patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and asthma were enrolled into a single-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study comparing 2 weeks of 1) 400 microg inhaled plus 200 microg intranasal budesonide once daily and 2) 10 mg montelukast plus 10 mg cetirizine once daily."5.09Effects of topical corticosteroid and combined mediator blockade on domiciliary and laboratory measurements of nasal function in seasonal allergic rhinitis. ( Coutie, WJ; Gardiner, Q; Lipworth, BJ; Orr, LC; Sims, EJ; White, PS; Wilson, AM, 2001)
"From a comprehensive databank containing data from ten different open-label prospective observational studies including raw data of 140,853 patients with allergic rhinitis, symptomatology variables were analysed and scored to study the effects of treatment with four antihistamines (Desloratadine, Ebastine, Fexofenadine, Levocetirizine) alone or in combination with intranasal corticosteroids."4.89The effectiveness of modern antihistamines for treatment of allergic rhinitis - an IPD meta-analysis of 140,853 patients. ( Köberlein, J; König, V; Mösges, R, 2013)
"Levocetirizine 5 mg/day is an effective and well-tolerated treatment of PAR."2.71Levocetirizine is effective for symptom relief including nasal congestion in adolescent and adult (PAR) sensitized to house dust mites. ( Potter, PC, 2003)
"Levocetirizine treatment induced significant symptom relief (P=0."2.71Levocetirizine improves nasal obstruction and modulates cytokine pattern in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis: a pilot study. ( Ciprandi, G; Cirillo, I; Tosca, MA; Vizzaccaro, A, 2004)
"Cetirizine treatment induced a significant decrease of IL4 (p<0."2.71Cetirizine reduces cytokines and inflammatory cells in children with perennial allergic rhinitis. ( Ciprandi, G; Milanese, M; Ricca, V; Tosca, MA, 2004)
"Levocetirizine treatment induced: significant symptom relief (p<0."2.71Levocetirizine improves nasal symptoms and airflow in patients with persistent allergic rhinitis: a pilot study. ( Ciprandi, G; Cirillo, IG; Tosca, MA; Vizzaccaro, A, 2005)
"Nasal obstruction is the main symptom in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis."2.71Desloratadine and levocetirizine improve nasal symptoms, airflow, and allergic inflammation in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis: a pilot study. ( Allen, M; Barberi, S; Ciprandi, G; Cirillo, I; Civardi, E; Marseglia, GL; Vizzaccaro, A, 2005)
" No clinically relevant adverse events were recorded."2.70Efficacy and safety of an oral formulation of cetirizine and prolonged-release pseudoephedrine versus xylometazoline nasal spray in nasal congestion. ( Berger, UE; Burtin, B; Horak, F; Marks, B; Stübner, UP; Toth, J, 2001)
"Cetirizine is a new antihistamine with greater selectivity for the histamine H1 receptor and a low rate of hepatic metabolism."2.68Comparative study of cetirizine and terfenadine versus placebo in the symptomatic management of seasonal allergic rhinitis. ( Dockhorn, R; Grossman, J; Lockey, RF; Lumry, W; Mitchell, DQ; Widlitz, MD; Woehler, T, 1996)
"Pretreatment with cetirizine blocked the histamine-induced change in nasal patency as measured by both methods."2.67Acoustic rhinometry compared with posterior rhinomanometry in the measurement of histamine- and bradykinin-induced changes in nasal airway patency. ( Austin, CE; Foreman, JC, 1994)
" Three-day repeat dosing of the intranasal solution GSK1004723 1,000 μg also demonstrated a statistically significant attenuation of nasal symptoms, but was less than seen with cetirizine and GSK835726 and caused initial nasal discomfort."2.48The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis. ( Ambery, C; Daley-Yates, P; McQuade, B; Oliver, A; Sweeney, L; Watson, J, 2012)
"Fexofenadine was associated with significantly lower nasal congestion scores compared with placebo in 4 studies (P <- 0."2.45A review of the efficacy of desloratadine, fexofenadine, and levocetirizine in the treatment of nasal congestion in patients with allergic rhinitis. ( Bachert, C, 2009)
"Nasal obstruction is a difficult-to-treat symptom."2.43Pathophysiology of nasal obstruction and meta-analysis of early and late effects of levocetirizine. ( Bachert, C; De Smedt, H; Patou, J; van Cauwenberge, P, 2006)
"Levocetirizine has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile; it is rapidly and extensively absorbed, minimally metabolized, and has a lower volume of distribution (V(d)) than some other second-generation antihistamines."2.42Levocetirizine: a new selective H1 receptor antagonist for use in allergic disorders. ( Day, JH; Ellis, AK; Rafeiro, E, 2004)
"Montelukast has not been reported to have major effects on sneezing and itching in the clinic but reduces nasal obstruction (lower nasal airway pressure or nasal patency)."1.35Differential responses to various classes of drugs in a model of allergic rhinitis in guinea pigs. ( Al Suleimani, YM; Dong, Y; Walker, MJ, 2008)

Research

Studies (24)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's6 (25.00)18.2507
2000's15 (62.50)29.6817
2010's3 (12.50)24.3611
2020's0 (0.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Mösges, R1
König, V1
Köberlein, J1
Badorrek, P1
Dick, M1
Schauerte, A1
Hecker, H1
Murdoch, R1
Luettig, B1
Hohlfeld, JM1
Krug, N1
Bachert, C2
Özgür, A1
Arslanoğlu, S1
Etıt, D1
Demıray, U1
Önal, HK1
Daley-Yates, P1
Ambery, C1
Sweeney, L1
Watson, J1
Oliver, A1
McQuade, B1
Potter, PC1
Ciprandi, G4
Cirillo, I2
Vizzaccaro, A3
Tosca, MA3
Day, JH1
Ellis, AK1
Rafeiro, E1
Milanese, M1
Ricca, V1
Lee, DK1
Currie, GP1
Taylor-Clark, T1
Sodha, R1
Warner, B1
Foreman, J1
Cirillo, IG1
Klimek, L1
Civardi, E1
Barberi, S1
Allen, M1
Marseglia, GL1
Patou, J1
De Smedt, H1
van Cauwenberge, P1
Al Suleimani, YM1
Dong, Y1
Walker, MJ1
Austin, CE1
Foreman, JC1
Lockey, RF1
Widlitz, MD1
Mitchell, DQ1
Lumry, W1
Dockhorn, R1
Woehler, T1
Grossman, J1
Wood-Baker, R1
Lau, L1
Howarth, PH1
Bertrand, B1
Eloy, P1
Rombeaux, P1
Wilson, AM1
Sims, EJ1
Orr, LC1
Coutie, WJ1
White, PS1
Gardiner, Q1
Lipworth, BJ1
Stübner, UP1
Toth, J1
Marks, B1
Berger, UE1
Burtin, B1
Horak, F1
Braunstein, G1
Malaquin, F1
Fajac, I1
Melac, M1
Frossard, N1
Dijkman, JH1
Hekking, PR1
Molkenboer, JF1
Nierop, G1
Vanderschueren, R1
Bernheim, J1
Van Ganse, EH1

Clinical Trials (8)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Cross-over Single Dose Escalation Study and a Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomised Parallel Group 7-days Once Daily Repeat Dose Study to Investigate Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmaco[NCT00605852]Phase 129 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-29Completed
A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, 4-period Incomplete Block Crossover Study of Single Oral Dose GSK835726 (100mg, 50mg, 10mg), Cetirizine (10mg) and Placebo to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety Using an Environmental Challenge Chamber in Male[NCT00851344]Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Single Dose Escalation Study and a Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomised Parallel Group 14-days Once Daily Repeat Dose Study to Investigate Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of an Intranasal H1[NCT00694993]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-17Completed
A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled 4-period Cross-over Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Repeat Dose Intranasal GSK1004723 (1000µg), Oral GSK835726 (10mg) and Cetirizine (10mg) in the Environmental Challenge Chamber in Subjects With S[NCT00972504]Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-01Completed
A Proof of Concept Study to Evaluate if Concomitant Topical Intranasal Steroid Prevents Tolerance and Rebound Congestion Due to Regular Oxymetazoline in Persistent Allergic Rhinitis.[NCT00846326]Phase 40 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn (stopped due to The suppliers were unable to provide the investigational medicinal product (IMP))
A Proof of Concept Study to Evaluate Differential Tachyphylaxis of Alpha 1 and Alpha 2 Adrenoreceptor Mediated Decongestant Response to Oxymetazoline and Its Acute Reversal by Corticosteroid in Healthy Volunteers[NCT00487032]Phase 419 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Reproducibility of Cell Counts in Nasal Lavage: A Comparison of Pooled Versus Non-Pooled Nasal Lavage Samples[NCT00229190]21 participants Interventional2004-09-30Completed
The Addition of Montelukast to Fluticasone in the Treatment of Perennial Allergic Rhinitis[NCT00119015]Phase 4102 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Terminated (stopped due to Difficulty in recruitment)
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Weighted Mean Nasal Congestion VAS 1-6 Hours Post Start of Allergen Challenge (2-7 Hours Post-dose) on Day 3

On the third dosing day, participants entered the ECC for a duration of 6 hours, 1 hour after receiving their third dose. Time 0 hour was considered as the time that the participant entered the ECC. Nasal congestion was measured on 0-10 centimeter VAS scale (0: no symptoms and 10: the worst possible symptoms) with low score indicates well-being and higher values indicate greater congestion. It was measured at 60, 80, 100, 120, 140, 160, 180, 200, 220, 240, 260, 280, 300, 320, 340 and 360 minutes. The adjusted mean is provided as least square mean. (NCT00972504)
Timeframe: Day 3 of each treatment period (approximately up to 63 days)

InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo3.97
GSK1004723 1000 µg Once Daily4.29
GSK835726 10 mg Once Daily2.92
Cetirizine 10 mg Once Daily2.90

Weighted Mean TNSS (Sneeze, Itch, Rhinorrhoea and Nasal Blockage) 1-6 Hours Post Start of Allergen Challenge (2-7 Hours Post-dose) on Day 3

On the third dosing day, participants entered the ECC for a duration of 6 hours, 1 hour after receiving their third dose. Time 0 hour was considered as the time that the participant entered the ECC. Nasal blockage, itch, sneeze and rhinorrhoea was scored on a categorical scale from 0 to 3 (0: no symptoms; 1: mild symptoms; 2: moderate symptoms; 3: severe symptoms). The total TNSS ranged from 0-12 point, with low score indicates well-being and higher score indicates more severity. Individual symptoms scores was summed at each time point (0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, 140, 160, 180, 200, 220, 240, 260, 280, 300, 320, 340 and 360 minutes). The adjusted mean is provided as least square mean. (NCT00972504)
Timeframe: Day 3 of each treatment period (approximately up to 63 days)

InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo4.9
GSK1004723 1000 µg Once Daily4.2
GSK835726 10 mg Once Daily3.6
Cetirizine 10 mg Once Daily3.5

Weighted Mean Wet Tissue Weight (as a Surrogate Marker of Nasal Secretion) 1-6 Hours Post Start of Allergen Challenge (2-7 Hours Post-dose) on Day 3

On the third dosing day, participants entered the ECC for a duration of 6 hours, 1 hour after receiving their third dose. Time 0 hour was considered as the time that the participant entered the ECC. Wet tissue weight assessments was measured as a surrogate marker of nasal secretion at 60, 120, 180, 240, 300 and 360 minutes. The adjusted mean is provided as least square mean. (NCT00972504)
Timeframe: Day 3 of each treatment period (approximately up to 63 days)

InterventionGrams (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo6.251
GSK1004723 1000 µg Once Daily5.210
GSK835726 10 mg Once Daily4.491
Cetirizine 10 mg Once Daily3.459

Mean Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)

On the third dosing day, participants entered the ECC for a duration of 6 hours, 1 hour after receiving their third dose. Time 0 hour was considered as the time that the participant entered the ECC. FEV1 was measured at pre-challenge, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300 and 360 minutes. (NCT00972504)
Timeframe: Day 3 of each treatment period (approximately up to 63 days)

,,,
InterventionLiters (Mean)
FEV1-Pre challengeFEV1,1 hourFEV1,2 hourFEV1,3 hourFEV1,4 hourFEV1,5 hourFEV1,6 hour
Cetirizine 10 mg Once Daily3.9323.9583.9253.8993.9033.8583.868
GSK1004723 1000 µg Once Daily3.9353.9593.9483.9383.9133.8903.877
GSK835726 10 mg Once Daily3.9243.9483.9363.9183.9033.8903.887
Placebo3.9083.9493.9103.9013.8813.8583.914

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence (MO) in a participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product (MP), whether or not considered related to the MP and can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with its use. The SAE was any untoward MO that, at any dose, results in death, life threatening, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, results in or prolongs inpatient hospitalization, congenital abnormality or birth defect, that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization but may jeopardize the participant or may require medical or surgical intervention or is associated with liver injury and impaired liver function defined as: alanine aminotransferase >=3 times upper limit of normal (ULN), and total bilirubin >=2 times ULN or international normalized ratio more than 1.5. (NCT00972504)
Timeframe: approximately up to 63 days

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any AEAny SAE
Cetirizine 10 mg Once Daily170
GSK1004723 1000 µg Once Daily530
GSK835726 10 mg Once Daily130
Placebo150

Weighted Mean of the Individual Components of TNSS (Sneeze, Itch, Rhinorrhoea and Nasal Blockage) 1-6 Hours Post Start of Allergen Challenge (2-7 Hours Post-dose) on Day 3

On the third dosing day, participants entered the ECC for a duration of 6 hours, 1 hour after receiving their third dose. Time 0 hour was considered as the time that the participant entered the ECC. Nasal blockage, itch, sneeze and rhinorrhoea was scored on a categorical scale from 0 to 3 (0: no symptoms; 1: mild symptoms; 2: moderate symptoms; 3: severe symptoms). The total TNSS ranged from 0-12 point, with low score indicates well-being and higher score indicates more severity. Individual symptoms scores was summed to produce the TNSS at each time point (0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, 140, 160, 180, 200, 220, 240, 260, 280, 300, 320, 340 and 360 minutes). The adjusted mean is provided as least square mean. (NCT00972504)
Timeframe: Day 3 of each treatment period (approximately up to 63 days)

,,,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Nasal BlockageRhinorrhoeaNasal ItchingSneezing
Cetirizine 10 mg Once Daily1.31.00.80.5
GSK1004723 1000 µg Once Daily1.71.30.90.4
GSK835726 10 mg Once Daily1.31.10.80.5
Placebo1.51.51.10.8

Change From Baseline in Other Symptom Score Over 2 Week Randomized Treatment Period

"Patients recorded the severity of other symptoms, including itchy nose/eyes and post-nasal drip, twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The other symptom score was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 6.~The baseline symptom score used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast-0.24
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo-0.14

Change From Baseline in Runny Nose Symptom Score Over 2 Week Randomized Treatment Period

"Patients recorded the severity of runny nose twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The runny nose symptom score was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 6.~The baseline symptom score used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast-0.52
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo-0.29

Change From Baseline in Sneezing Symptom Score Over 2 Week Randomized Treatment Period

"Patients recorded the severity of sneezing twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The sneezing symptom score was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 6.~The baseline symptom score used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast-0.22
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo-0.25

Change From Baseline in Stuffy Nose Symptom Score Over 2 Week Randomized Treatment Period

"Patients recorded the severity of stuffy nose twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The stuffy nose symptom score was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 6.~The baseline symptom score used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast-0.41
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo-0.47

Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Over 2 Week Randomized Treatment Period

"Patients recorded the severity of sneezing, runny nose, stuffy nose, and other symptoms (itchy nose/eyes and post-nasal drip) twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The TNSS was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 24.~The baseline TNSS used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast-1.66
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo-2.21

Reviews

7 reviews available for cetirizine and Nasal Obstruction

ArticleYear
The effectiveness of modern antihistamines for treatment of allergic rhinitis - an IPD meta-analysis of 140,853 patients.
    Allergology international : official journal of the Japanese Society of Allergology, 2013, Volume: 62, Issue:2

    Topics: Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Histamine Antagonists; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Hum

2013
A review of the efficacy of desloratadine, fexofenadine, and levocetirizine in the treatment of nasal congestion in patients with allergic rhinitis.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2009, Volume: 31, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cetirizine; Child; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; His

2009
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    International archives of allergy and immunology, 2012, Volume: 158, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli

2012
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    International archives of allergy and immunology, 2012, Volume: 158, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli

2012
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    International archives of allergy and immunology, 2012, Volume: 158, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli

2012
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    International archives of allergy and immunology, 2012, Volume: 158, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli

2012
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    International archives of allergy and immunology, 2012, Volume: 158, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli

2012
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    International archives of allergy and immunology, 2012, Volume: 158, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli

2012
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    International archives of allergy and immunology, 2012, Volume: 158, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli

2012
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    International archives of allergy and immunology, 2012, Volume: 158, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli

2012
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    International archives of allergy and immunology, 2012, Volume: 158, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli

2012
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    International archives of allergy and immunology, 2012, Volume: 158, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli

2012
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    International archives of allergy and immunology, 2012, Volume: 158, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli

2012
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    International archives of allergy and immunology, 2012, Volume: 158, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli

2012
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    International archives of allergy and immunology, 2012, Volume: 158, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli

2012
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    International archives of allergy and immunology, 2012, Volume: 158, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli

2012
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    International archives of allergy and immunology, 2012, Volume: 158, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli

2012
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    International archives of allergy and immunology, 2012, Volume: 158, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli

2012
Levocetirizine: a new selective H1 receptor antagonist for use in allergic disorders.
    Drugs of today (Barcelona, Spain : 1998), 2004, Volume: 40, Issue:5

    Topics: Cetirizine; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Nasal Obstruction; Piperazines; Randomiz

2004
Potential of levocetirizine in the relief of nasal congestion.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2005, Volume: 59, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating

2005
Pathophysiology of nasal obstruction and meta-analysis of early and late effects of levocetirizine.
    Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2006, Volume: 36, Issue:8

    Topics: Cetirizine; Eosinophils; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Mast Cells; Nasal Obstructi

2006
Pathophysiology of nasal obstruction and meta-analysis of early and late effects of levocetirizine.
    Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2006, Volume: 36, Issue:8

    Topics: Cetirizine; Eosinophils; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Mast Cells; Nasal Obstructi

2006
Pathophysiology of nasal obstruction and meta-analysis of early and late effects of levocetirizine.
    Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2006, Volume: 36, Issue:8

    Topics: Cetirizine; Eosinophils; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Mast Cells; Nasal Obstructi

2006
Pathophysiology of nasal obstruction and meta-analysis of early and late effects of levocetirizine.
    Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2006, Volume: 36, Issue:8

    Topics: Cetirizine; Eosinophils; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Mast Cells; Nasal Obstructi

2006
Allergy and sinusitis.
    Acta oto-rhino-laryngologica Belgica, 1997, Volume: 51, Issue:4

    Topics: Allergens; Anti-Allergic Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Beclomethasone; Blood Proteins; Cetirizin

1997

Trials

13 trials available for cetirizine and Nasal Obstruction

ArticleYear
A combination of cetirizine and pseudoephedrine has therapeutic benefits when compared to single drug treatment in allergic rhinitis.
    International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2009, Volume: 47, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Cetirizine; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Drug Synergism; Femal

2009
Levocetirizine is effective for symptom relief including nasal congestion in adolescent and adult (PAR) sensitized to house dust mites.
    Allergy, 2003, Volume: 58, Issue:9

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Animals; Cetirizine; Double-Blind Method; Dust; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists,

2003
Levocetirizine improves nasal obstruction and modulates cytokine pattern in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis: a pilot study.
    Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2004, Volume: 34, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Cetirizine; Double-Blind Method; Eosinophils; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Inter

2004
Cetirizine reduces cytokines and inflammatory cells in children with perennial allergic rhinitis.
    European annals of allergy and clinical immunology, 2004, Volume: 36, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Animals; Cetirizine; Child; Double-Blind Method; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Eosi

2004
Levocetirizine improves nasal symptoms and airflow in patients with persistent allergic rhinitis: a pilot study.
    European annals of allergy and clinical immunology, 2005, Volume: 37, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Cetirizine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating;

2005
Desloratadine and levocetirizine improve nasal symptoms, airflow, and allergic inflammation in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis: a pilot study.
    International immunopharmacology, 2005, Volume: 5, Issue:13-14

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Cetirizine; Double-Blind Method; Eosinophils; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists, N

2005
Acoustic rhinometry compared with posterior rhinomanometry in the measurement of histamine- and bradykinin-induced changes in nasal airway patency.
    British journal of clinical pharmacology, 1994, Volume: 37, Issue:1

    Topics: Acoustics; Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adult; Airway Resistance; Bradykinin; C

1994
Comparative study of cetirizine and terfenadine versus placebo in the symptomatic management of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 1996, Volume: 76, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Cetirizine; Child; Double-Blind Method; Ephedrine; Female; Humans; Male; Mi

1996
Histamine and the nasal vasculature: the influence of H1 and H2-histamine receptor antagonism.
    Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences, 1996, Volume: 21, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Airway Resistance; Cetirizine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Histami

1996
Effects of topical corticosteroid and combined mediator blockade on domiciliary and laboratory measurements of nasal function in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2001, Volume: 87, Issue:4

    Topics: Acetates; Administration, Inhalation; Administration, Intranasal; Adult; Airway Resistance; Anti-All

2001
Efficacy and safety of an oral formulation of cetirizine and prolonged-release pseudoephedrine versus xylometazoline nasal spray in nasal congestion.
    Arzneimittel-Forschung, 2001, Volume: 51, Issue:11

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adult; Blood Pressure; Cetirizine; Cross-Over Stud

2001
Inhibition of histamine-induced nasal obstruction by cetirizine in allergic rhinitis.
    British journal of clinical pharmacology, 1992, Volume: 33, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Airway Resistance; Cetirizine; Female; Histamine; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Hydroxyzi

1992
Prophylactic treatment of grass pollen-induced asthma with cetirizine.
    Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1990, Volume: 20, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Asthma; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cetirizine; Child; Double-Blind Method; Femal

1990

Other Studies

4 other studies available for cetirizine and Nasal Obstruction

ArticleYear
Comparison of nasal cytology and symptom scores in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis, before and after treatment.
    The Journal of laryngology and otology, 2011, Volume: 125, Issue:10

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Adult; Aged; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Drug Therapy, Combination

2011
Modern histamine H1-receptor antagonists in the unified airway.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2004, Volume: 114, Issue:3

    Topics: Cetirizine; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Loratadine; Nasal Obstruction; Nasal Pro

2004
Histamine receptors that influence blockage of the normal human nasal airway.
    British journal of pharmacology, 2005, Volume: 144, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Cetirizine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Histamine; Histamine Agonist

2005
Differential responses to various classes of drugs in a model of allergic rhinitis in guinea pigs.
    Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2008, Volume: 21, Issue:2

    Topics: Acetates; Acute Disease; Animals; Cetirizine; Cyclopropanes; Dexamethasone; Disease Models, Animal;

2008