cetirizine has been researched along with Nasal Obstruction in 24 studies
Cetirizine: A potent second-generation histamine H1 antagonist that is effective in the treatment of allergic rhinitis, chronic urticaria, and pollen-induced asthma. Unlike many traditional antihistamines, it does not cause drowsiness or anticholinergic side effects.
cetirizine : A member of the class of piperazines that is piperazine in which the hydrogens attached to nitrogen are replaced by a (4-chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methyl and a 2-(carboxymethoxy)ethyl group respectively.
Nasal Obstruction: Any hindrance to the passage of air into and out of the nose. The obstruction may be unilateral or bilateral, and may involve any part of the NASAL CAVITY.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"Levocetirizine treatment induced significant symptom relief (P=0." | 6.71 | Levocetirizine improves nasal obstruction and modulates cytokine pattern in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis: a pilot study. ( Ciprandi, G; Cirillo, I; Tosca, MA; Vizzaccaro, A, 2004) |
"Nasal obstruction is the main symptom in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis." | 6.71 | Desloratadine and levocetirizine improve nasal symptoms, airflow, and allergic inflammation in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis: a pilot study. ( Allen, M; Barberi, S; Ciprandi, G; Cirillo, I; Civardi, E; Marseglia, GL; Vizzaccaro, A, 2005) |
"Nasal obstruction is a difficult-to-treat symptom." | 6.43 | Pathophysiology of nasal obstruction and meta-analysis of early and late effects of levocetirizine. ( Bachert, C; De Smedt, H; Patou, J; van Cauwenberge, P, 2006) |
"Twenty-one patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and asthma were enrolled into a single-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study comparing 2 weeks of 1) 400 microg inhaled plus 200 microg intranasal budesonide once daily and 2) 10 mg montelukast plus 10 mg cetirizine once daily." | 5.09 | Effects of topical corticosteroid and combined mediator blockade on domiciliary and laboratory measurements of nasal function in seasonal allergic rhinitis. ( Coutie, WJ; Gardiner, Q; Lipworth, BJ; Orr, LC; Sims, EJ; White, PS; Wilson, AM, 2001) |
"From a comprehensive databank containing data from ten different open-label prospective observational studies including raw data of 140,853 patients with allergic rhinitis, symptomatology variables were analysed and scored to study the effects of treatment with four antihistamines (Desloratadine, Ebastine, Fexofenadine, Levocetirizine) alone or in combination with intranasal corticosteroids." | 4.89 | The effectiveness of modern antihistamines for treatment of allergic rhinitis - an IPD meta-analysis of 140,853 patients. ( Köberlein, J; König, V; Mösges, R, 2013) |
"Levocetirizine 5 mg/day is an effective and well-tolerated treatment of PAR." | 2.71 | Levocetirizine is effective for symptom relief including nasal congestion in adolescent and adult (PAR) sensitized to house dust mites. ( Potter, PC, 2003) |
"Levocetirizine treatment induced significant symptom relief (P=0." | 2.71 | Levocetirizine improves nasal obstruction and modulates cytokine pattern in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis: a pilot study. ( Ciprandi, G; Cirillo, I; Tosca, MA; Vizzaccaro, A, 2004) |
"Cetirizine treatment induced a significant decrease of IL4 (p<0." | 2.71 | Cetirizine reduces cytokines and inflammatory cells in children with perennial allergic rhinitis. ( Ciprandi, G; Milanese, M; Ricca, V; Tosca, MA, 2004) |
"Levocetirizine treatment induced: significant symptom relief (p<0." | 2.71 | Levocetirizine improves nasal symptoms and airflow in patients with persistent allergic rhinitis: a pilot study. ( Ciprandi, G; Cirillo, IG; Tosca, MA; Vizzaccaro, A, 2005) |
"Nasal obstruction is the main symptom in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis." | 2.71 | Desloratadine and levocetirizine improve nasal symptoms, airflow, and allergic inflammation in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis: a pilot study. ( Allen, M; Barberi, S; Ciprandi, G; Cirillo, I; Civardi, E; Marseglia, GL; Vizzaccaro, A, 2005) |
" No clinically relevant adverse events were recorded." | 2.70 | Efficacy and safety of an oral formulation of cetirizine and prolonged-release pseudoephedrine versus xylometazoline nasal spray in nasal congestion. ( Berger, UE; Burtin, B; Horak, F; Marks, B; Stübner, UP; Toth, J, 2001) |
"Cetirizine is a new antihistamine with greater selectivity for the histamine H1 receptor and a low rate of hepatic metabolism." | 2.68 | Comparative study of cetirizine and terfenadine versus placebo in the symptomatic management of seasonal allergic rhinitis. ( Dockhorn, R; Grossman, J; Lockey, RF; Lumry, W; Mitchell, DQ; Widlitz, MD; Woehler, T, 1996) |
"Pretreatment with cetirizine blocked the histamine-induced change in nasal patency as measured by both methods." | 2.67 | Acoustic rhinometry compared with posterior rhinomanometry in the measurement of histamine- and bradykinin-induced changes in nasal airway patency. ( Austin, CE; Foreman, JC, 1994) |
" Three-day repeat dosing of the intranasal solution GSK1004723 1,000 μg also demonstrated a statistically significant attenuation of nasal symptoms, but was less than seen with cetirizine and GSK835726 and caused initial nasal discomfort." | 2.48 | The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis. ( Ambery, C; Daley-Yates, P; McQuade, B; Oliver, A; Sweeney, L; Watson, J, 2012) |
"Fexofenadine was associated with significantly lower nasal congestion scores compared with placebo in 4 studies (P <- 0." | 2.45 | A review of the efficacy of desloratadine, fexofenadine, and levocetirizine in the treatment of nasal congestion in patients with allergic rhinitis. ( Bachert, C, 2009) |
"Nasal obstruction is a difficult-to-treat symptom." | 2.43 | Pathophysiology of nasal obstruction and meta-analysis of early and late effects of levocetirizine. ( Bachert, C; De Smedt, H; Patou, J; van Cauwenberge, P, 2006) |
"Levocetirizine has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile; it is rapidly and extensively absorbed, minimally metabolized, and has a lower volume of distribution (V(d)) than some other second-generation antihistamines." | 2.42 | Levocetirizine: a new selective H1 receptor antagonist for use in allergic disorders. ( Day, JH; Ellis, AK; Rafeiro, E, 2004) |
"Montelukast has not been reported to have major effects on sneezing and itching in the clinic but reduces nasal obstruction (lower nasal airway pressure or nasal patency)." | 1.35 | Differential responses to various classes of drugs in a model of allergic rhinitis in guinea pigs. ( Al Suleimani, YM; Dong, Y; Walker, MJ, 2008) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 6 (25.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 15 (62.50) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 3 (12.50) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 0 (0.00) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Mösges, R | 1 |
König, V | 1 |
Köberlein, J | 1 |
Badorrek, P | 1 |
Dick, M | 1 |
Schauerte, A | 1 |
Hecker, H | 1 |
Murdoch, R | 1 |
Luettig, B | 1 |
Hohlfeld, JM | 1 |
Krug, N | 1 |
Bachert, C | 2 |
Özgür, A | 1 |
Arslanoğlu, S | 1 |
Etıt, D | 1 |
Demıray, U | 1 |
Önal, HK | 1 |
Daley-Yates, P | 1 |
Ambery, C | 1 |
Sweeney, L | 1 |
Watson, J | 1 |
Oliver, A | 1 |
McQuade, B | 1 |
Potter, PC | 1 |
Ciprandi, G | 4 |
Cirillo, I | 2 |
Vizzaccaro, A | 3 |
Tosca, MA | 3 |
Day, JH | 1 |
Ellis, AK | 1 |
Rafeiro, E | 1 |
Milanese, M | 1 |
Ricca, V | 1 |
Lee, DK | 1 |
Currie, GP | 1 |
Taylor-Clark, T | 1 |
Sodha, R | 1 |
Warner, B | 1 |
Foreman, J | 1 |
Cirillo, IG | 1 |
Klimek, L | 1 |
Civardi, E | 1 |
Barberi, S | 1 |
Allen, M | 1 |
Marseglia, GL | 1 |
Patou, J | 1 |
De Smedt, H | 1 |
van Cauwenberge, P | 1 |
Al Suleimani, YM | 1 |
Dong, Y | 1 |
Walker, MJ | 1 |
Austin, CE | 1 |
Foreman, JC | 1 |
Lockey, RF | 1 |
Widlitz, MD | 1 |
Mitchell, DQ | 1 |
Lumry, W | 1 |
Dockhorn, R | 1 |
Woehler, T | 1 |
Grossman, J | 1 |
Wood-Baker, R | 1 |
Lau, L | 1 |
Howarth, PH | 1 |
Bertrand, B | 1 |
Eloy, P | 1 |
Rombeaux, P | 1 |
Wilson, AM | 1 |
Sims, EJ | 1 |
Orr, LC | 1 |
Coutie, WJ | 1 |
White, PS | 1 |
Gardiner, Q | 1 |
Lipworth, BJ | 1 |
Stübner, UP | 1 |
Toth, J | 1 |
Marks, B | 1 |
Berger, UE | 1 |
Burtin, B | 1 |
Horak, F | 1 |
Braunstein, G | 1 |
Malaquin, F | 1 |
Fajac, I | 1 |
Melac, M | 1 |
Frossard, N | 1 |
Dijkman, JH | 1 |
Hekking, PR | 1 |
Molkenboer, JF | 1 |
Nierop, G | 1 |
Vanderschueren, R | 1 |
Bernheim, J | 1 |
Van Ganse, EH | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Cross-over Single Dose Escalation Study and a Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomised Parallel Group 7-days Once Daily Repeat Dose Study to Investigate Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmaco[NCT00605852] | Phase 1 | 29 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2007-10-29 | Completed | ||
A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, 4-period Incomplete Block Crossover Study of Single Oral Dose GSK835726 (100mg, 50mg, 10mg), Cetirizine (10mg) and Placebo to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety Using an Environmental Challenge Chamber in Male[NCT00851344] | Phase 2 | 54 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-09-30 | Completed | ||
A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Single Dose Escalation Study and a Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomised Parallel Group 14-days Once Daily Repeat Dose Study to Investigate Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of an Intranasal H1[NCT00694993] | Phase 1 | 19 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2007-12-17 | Completed | ||
A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled 4-period Cross-over Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Repeat Dose Intranasal GSK1004723 (1000µg), Oral GSK835726 (10mg) and Cetirizine (10mg) in the Environmental Challenge Chamber in Subjects With S[NCT00972504] | Phase 2 | 54 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-06-01 | Completed | ||
A Proof of Concept Study to Evaluate if Concomitant Topical Intranasal Steroid Prevents Tolerance and Rebound Congestion Due to Regular Oxymetazoline in Persistent Allergic Rhinitis.[NCT00846326] | Phase 4 | 0 participants (Actual) | Interventional | Withdrawn (stopped due to The suppliers were unable to provide the investigational medicinal product (IMP)) | |||
A Proof of Concept Study to Evaluate Differential Tachyphylaxis of Alpha 1 and Alpha 2 Adrenoreceptor Mediated Decongestant Response to Oxymetazoline and Its Acute Reversal by Corticosteroid in Healthy Volunteers[NCT00487032] | Phase 4 | 19 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-05-31 | Completed | ||
Reproducibility of Cell Counts in Nasal Lavage: A Comparison of Pooled Versus Non-Pooled Nasal Lavage Samples[NCT00229190] | 21 participants | Interventional | 2004-09-30 | Completed | |||
The Addition of Montelukast to Fluticasone in the Treatment of Perennial Allergic Rhinitis[NCT00119015] | Phase 4 | 102 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2005-07-31 | Terminated (stopped due to Difficulty in recruitment) | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
On the third dosing day, participants entered the ECC for a duration of 6 hours, 1 hour after receiving their third dose. Time 0 hour was considered as the time that the participant entered the ECC. Nasal congestion was measured on 0-10 centimeter VAS scale (0: no symptoms and 10: the worst possible symptoms) with low score indicates well-being and higher values indicate greater congestion. It was measured at 60, 80, 100, 120, 140, 160, 180, 200, 220, 240, 260, 280, 300, 320, 340 and 360 minutes. The adjusted mean is provided as least square mean. (NCT00972504)
Timeframe: Day 3 of each treatment period (approximately up to 63 days)
Intervention | Score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 3.97 |
GSK1004723 1000 µg Once Daily | 4.29 |
GSK835726 10 mg Once Daily | 2.92 |
Cetirizine 10 mg Once Daily | 2.90 |
On the third dosing day, participants entered the ECC for a duration of 6 hours, 1 hour after receiving their third dose. Time 0 hour was considered as the time that the participant entered the ECC. Nasal blockage, itch, sneeze and rhinorrhoea was scored on a categorical scale from 0 to 3 (0: no symptoms; 1: mild symptoms; 2: moderate symptoms; 3: severe symptoms). The total TNSS ranged from 0-12 point, with low score indicates well-being and higher score indicates more severity. Individual symptoms scores was summed at each time point (0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, 140, 160, 180, 200, 220, 240, 260, 280, 300, 320, 340 and 360 minutes). The adjusted mean is provided as least square mean. (NCT00972504)
Timeframe: Day 3 of each treatment period (approximately up to 63 days)
Intervention | Score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 4.9 |
GSK1004723 1000 µg Once Daily | 4.2 |
GSK835726 10 mg Once Daily | 3.6 |
Cetirizine 10 mg Once Daily | 3.5 |
On the third dosing day, participants entered the ECC for a duration of 6 hours, 1 hour after receiving their third dose. Time 0 hour was considered as the time that the participant entered the ECC. Wet tissue weight assessments was measured as a surrogate marker of nasal secretion at 60, 120, 180, 240, 300 and 360 minutes. The adjusted mean is provided as least square mean. (NCT00972504)
Timeframe: Day 3 of each treatment period (approximately up to 63 days)
Intervention | Grams (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 6.251 |
GSK1004723 1000 µg Once Daily | 5.210 |
GSK835726 10 mg Once Daily | 4.491 |
Cetirizine 10 mg Once Daily | 3.459 |
On the third dosing day, participants entered the ECC for a duration of 6 hours, 1 hour after receiving their third dose. Time 0 hour was considered as the time that the participant entered the ECC. FEV1 was measured at pre-challenge, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300 and 360 minutes. (NCT00972504)
Timeframe: Day 3 of each treatment period (approximately up to 63 days)
Intervention | Liters (Mean) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEV1-Pre challenge | FEV1,1 hour | FEV1,2 hour | FEV1,3 hour | FEV1,4 hour | FEV1,5 hour | FEV1,6 hour | |
Cetirizine 10 mg Once Daily | 3.932 | 3.958 | 3.925 | 3.899 | 3.903 | 3.858 | 3.868 |
GSK1004723 1000 µg Once Daily | 3.935 | 3.959 | 3.948 | 3.938 | 3.913 | 3.890 | 3.877 |
GSK835726 10 mg Once Daily | 3.924 | 3.948 | 3.936 | 3.918 | 3.903 | 3.890 | 3.887 |
Placebo | 3.908 | 3.949 | 3.910 | 3.901 | 3.881 | 3.858 | 3.914 |
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence (MO) in a participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product (MP), whether or not considered related to the MP and can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with its use. The SAE was any untoward MO that, at any dose, results in death, life threatening, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, results in or prolongs inpatient hospitalization, congenital abnormality or birth defect, that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization but may jeopardize the participant or may require medical or surgical intervention or is associated with liver injury and impaired liver function defined as: alanine aminotransferase >=3 times upper limit of normal (ULN), and total bilirubin >=2 times ULN or international normalized ratio more than 1.5. (NCT00972504)
Timeframe: approximately up to 63 days
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Any AE | Any SAE | |
Cetirizine 10 mg Once Daily | 17 | 0 |
GSK1004723 1000 µg Once Daily | 53 | 0 |
GSK835726 10 mg Once Daily | 13 | 0 |
Placebo | 15 | 0 |
On the third dosing day, participants entered the ECC for a duration of 6 hours, 1 hour after receiving their third dose. Time 0 hour was considered as the time that the participant entered the ECC. Nasal blockage, itch, sneeze and rhinorrhoea was scored on a categorical scale from 0 to 3 (0: no symptoms; 1: mild symptoms; 2: moderate symptoms; 3: severe symptoms). The total TNSS ranged from 0-12 point, with low score indicates well-being and higher score indicates more severity. Individual symptoms scores was summed to produce the TNSS at each time point (0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, 140, 160, 180, 200, 220, 240, 260, 280, 300, 320, 340 and 360 minutes). The adjusted mean is provided as least square mean. (NCT00972504)
Timeframe: Day 3 of each treatment period (approximately up to 63 days)
Intervention | Score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Nasal Blockage | Rhinorrhoea | Nasal Itching | Sneezing | |
Cetirizine 10 mg Once Daily | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.5 |
GSK1004723 1000 µg Once Daily | 1.7 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.4 |
GSK835726 10 mg Once Daily | 1.3 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.5 |
Placebo | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 0.8 |
"Patients recorded the severity of other symptoms, including itchy nose/eyes and post-nasal drip, twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The other symptom score was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 6.~The baseline symptom score used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast | -0.24 |
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo | -0.14 |
"Patients recorded the severity of runny nose twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The runny nose symptom score was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 6.~The baseline symptom score used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast | -0.52 |
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo | -0.29 |
"Patients recorded the severity of sneezing twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The sneezing symptom score was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 6.~The baseline symptom score used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast | -0.22 |
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo | -0.25 |
"Patients recorded the severity of stuffy nose twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The stuffy nose symptom score was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 6.~The baseline symptom score used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast | -0.41 |
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo | -0.47 |
"Patients recorded the severity of sneezing, runny nose, stuffy nose, and other symptoms (itchy nose/eyes and post-nasal drip) twice a day on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The TNSS was calculated as the sum of all scores for morning and evening recordings with a range of 0 to 24.~The baseline TNSS used in the analysis was the average of the symptom scores from the last 5 days of fluticasone propionate therapy prior to randomized treatment period.~The change from baseline for each subsequent day of treatment was then calculated for each subject. So that each subject only had one observation, the average of these changes was calculated for each subject, and this summary measure was used in the analysis comparing the two treatment groups. We report the median and full range of these average changes for each group.~A negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00119015)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Fluticasone Propionate + Montelukast | -1.66 |
Fluticasone Propionate + Placebo | -2.21 |
7 reviews available for cetirizine and Nasal Obstruction
Article | Year |
---|---|
The effectiveness of modern antihistamines for treatment of allergic rhinitis - an IPD meta-analysis of 140,853 patients.
Topics: Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Histamine Antagonists; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Hum | 2013 |
A review of the efficacy of desloratadine, fexofenadine, and levocetirizine in the treatment of nasal congestion in patients with allergic rhinitis.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cetirizine; Child; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; His | 2009 |
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli | 2012 |
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli | 2012 |
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli | 2012 |
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli | 2012 |
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli | 2012 |
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli | 2012 |
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli | 2012 |
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli | 2012 |
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli | 2012 |
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli | 2012 |
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli | 2012 |
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli | 2012 |
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli | 2012 |
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli | 2012 |
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli | 2012 |
The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cli | 2012 |
Levocetirizine: a new selective H1 receptor antagonist for use in allergic disorders.
Topics: Cetirizine; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Nasal Obstruction; Piperazines; Randomiz | 2004 |
Potential of levocetirizine in the relief of nasal congestion.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating | 2005 |
Pathophysiology of nasal obstruction and meta-analysis of early and late effects of levocetirizine.
Topics: Cetirizine; Eosinophils; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Mast Cells; Nasal Obstructi | 2006 |
Pathophysiology of nasal obstruction and meta-analysis of early and late effects of levocetirizine.
Topics: Cetirizine; Eosinophils; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Mast Cells; Nasal Obstructi | 2006 |
Pathophysiology of nasal obstruction and meta-analysis of early and late effects of levocetirizine.
Topics: Cetirizine; Eosinophils; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Mast Cells; Nasal Obstructi | 2006 |
Pathophysiology of nasal obstruction and meta-analysis of early and late effects of levocetirizine.
Topics: Cetirizine; Eosinophils; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Mast Cells; Nasal Obstructi | 2006 |
Allergy and sinusitis.
Topics: Allergens; Anti-Allergic Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Beclomethasone; Blood Proteins; Cetirizin | 1997 |
13 trials available for cetirizine and Nasal Obstruction
Article | Year |
---|---|
A combination of cetirizine and pseudoephedrine has therapeutic benefits when compared to single drug treatment in allergic rhinitis.
Topics: Adult; Cetirizine; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Drug Synergism; Femal | 2009 |
Levocetirizine is effective for symptom relief including nasal congestion in adolescent and adult (PAR) sensitized to house dust mites.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Animals; Cetirizine; Double-Blind Method; Dust; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists, | 2003 |
Levocetirizine improves nasal obstruction and modulates cytokine pattern in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis: a pilot study.
Topics: Adult; Cetirizine; Double-Blind Method; Eosinophils; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Inter | 2004 |
Cetirizine reduces cytokines and inflammatory cells in children with perennial allergic rhinitis.
Topics: Adolescent; Animals; Cetirizine; Child; Double-Blind Method; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Eosi | 2004 |
Levocetirizine improves nasal symptoms and airflow in patients with persistent allergic rhinitis: a pilot study.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Cetirizine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; | 2005 |
Desloratadine and levocetirizine improve nasal symptoms, airflow, and allergic inflammation in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis: a pilot study.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Cetirizine; Double-Blind Method; Eosinophils; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists, N | 2005 |
Acoustic rhinometry compared with posterior rhinomanometry in the measurement of histamine- and bradykinin-induced changes in nasal airway patency.
Topics: Acoustics; Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adult; Airway Resistance; Bradykinin; C | 1994 |
Comparative study of cetirizine and terfenadine versus placebo in the symptomatic management of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Cetirizine; Child; Double-Blind Method; Ephedrine; Female; Humans; Male; Mi | 1996 |
Histamine and the nasal vasculature: the influence of H1 and H2-histamine receptor antagonism.
Topics: Adult; Airway Resistance; Cetirizine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Histami | 1996 |
Effects of topical corticosteroid and combined mediator blockade on domiciliary and laboratory measurements of nasal function in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Topics: Acetates; Administration, Inhalation; Administration, Intranasal; Adult; Airway Resistance; Anti-All | 2001 |
Efficacy and safety of an oral formulation of cetirizine and prolonged-release pseudoephedrine versus xylometazoline nasal spray in nasal congestion.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adult; Blood Pressure; Cetirizine; Cross-Over Stud | 2001 |
Inhibition of histamine-induced nasal obstruction by cetirizine in allergic rhinitis.
Topics: Adult; Airway Resistance; Cetirizine; Female; Histamine; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Hydroxyzi | 1992 |
Prophylactic treatment of grass pollen-induced asthma with cetirizine.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Asthma; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cetirizine; Child; Double-Blind Method; Femal | 1990 |
4 other studies available for cetirizine and Nasal Obstruction
Article | Year |
---|---|
Comparison of nasal cytology and symptom scores in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis, before and after treatment.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Adult; Aged; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cetirizine; Drug Therapy, Combination | 2011 |
Modern histamine H1-receptor antagonists in the unified airway.
Topics: Cetirizine; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Loratadine; Nasal Obstruction; Nasal Pro | 2004 |
Histamine receptors that influence blockage of the normal human nasal airway.
Topics: Adult; Cetirizine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Histamine; Histamine Agonist | 2005 |
Differential responses to various classes of drugs in a model of allergic rhinitis in guinea pigs.
Topics: Acetates; Acute Disease; Animals; Cetirizine; Cyclopropanes; Dexamethasone; Disease Models, Animal; | 2008 |