Page last updated: 2024-10-24

celecoxib and Arthralgia

celecoxib has been researched along with Arthralgia in 24 studies

Arthralgia: Pain in the joint.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" The authors encountered extensive bleeding in a patient receiving warfarin for anticoagulation after the introduction of celecoxib, an anti-inflammatory drug."7.72Warfarin and celecoxib interaction in the setting of cytochrome P450 (CYP2C9) polymorphism with bleeding complication. ( Atac, B; Daly, AK; Gupta, S; Malhi, H, 2004)
"Celecoxib was used in eight patients with chronic synovitis, three patients with pain, and in one patient with a target joint on three occasions."5.33Celecoxib in the treatment of haemophilic synovitis, target joints, and pain in adults and children with haemophilia. ( Nugent, DJ; Rattray, B; Young, G, 2006)
"Celecoxib is frequently prescribed to treat knee osteoarthritis (KOA), but how celecoxib influences the activity of the central nervous system to alleviate chronic pain remains unclear."5.30Cerebral mechanism of celecoxib for treating knee pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled parallel trial. ( Chen, Y; Cheng, S; Dong, X; He, W; Huang, Y; Li, Z; Liang, F; Sheng, Y; Tang, C; Wu, X; Yin, B; Zeng, F; Zhou, J, 2019)
" Therefore, this study examined the effect of KML29 alone as well as in combination with low-dose celecoxib (CXB) on joint pain and inflammation in the monoiodoacetate (MIA) model of osteoarthritis (OA) pain."3.96Combatting joint pain and inflammation by dual inhibition of monoacylglycerol lipase and cyclooxygenase-2 in a rat model of osteoarthritis. ( McDougall, JJ; Philpott, HT, 2020)
" The authors encountered extensive bleeding in a patient receiving warfarin for anticoagulation after the introduction of celecoxib, an anti-inflammatory drug."3.72Warfarin and celecoxib interaction in the setting of cytochrome P450 (CYP2C9) polymorphism with bleeding complication. ( Atac, B; Daly, AK; Gupta, S; Malhi, H, 2004)
"Diacerein was non-inferior to celecoxib in reducing knee OA pain and improving physical function."2.94An international, multicentre, double-blind, randomized study (DISSCO): effect of diacerein vs celecoxib on symptoms in knee osteoarthritis. ( Bessette, L; Dokoupilova, E; Dorais, M; Martel-Pelletier, J; Morin, F; Paiement, P; Pavelka, K; Pelletier, JP; Raynauld, JP, 2020)
" Safety assessments included adverse events, physical and neurological examinations, laboratory tests and vital signs."2.80Efficacy and safety of tanezumab monotherapy or combined with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of knee or hip osteoarthritis pain. ( Brown, MT; Ekman, EF; Greenberg, HS; Schnitzer, TJ; Smith, MD; Spierings, EL; Verburg, KM; West, CR, 2015)
"The intensity of joint pain was assessed with a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS)."2.73Effects of nimesulide on pain and on synovial fluid concentrations of substance P, interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 in patients with knee osteoarthritis: comparison with celecoxib. ( Balzarini, P; Bianchi, M; Broggini, M; Franchi, S; Sacerdote, P, 2007)
"Rofecoxib treatment, with its faster onset of OA efficacy and lower rates of related discontinuations, might provide efficacy advantages in the treatment of OA pain."2.71Pain management in osteoarthritis: a focus on onset of efficacy--a comparison of rofecoxib, celecoxib, acetaminophen, and nabumetone across four clinical trials. ( Battisti, WP; Geba, GP; Katz, NP; Kivitz, AJ; Matsumoto, AK; Polis, AB; Weaver, AL, 2004)
" Although no significant difference was observed among the five options with respect to the three major adverse effects (withdrawal due to adverse events, serious adverse events and the number of patients with adverse events), the additional classical meta-analysis showed that celecoxib exhibited a higher rate of gastrointestinal adverse effect comparing with the placebo group."2.52Effectiveness and safety of Glucosamine, chondroitin, the two in combination, or celecoxib in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. ( Gao, SG; Lei, GH; Li, H; Li, YS; Luo, W; Wang, YL; Wei, J; Xie, DX; Yang, T; Zeng, C, 2015)
"Celecoxib was used in eight patients with chronic synovitis, three patients with pain, and in one patient with a target joint on three occasions."1.33Celecoxib in the treatment of haemophilic synovitis, target joints, and pain in adults and children with haemophilia. ( Nugent, DJ; Rattray, B; Young, G, 2006)

Research

Studies (24)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's1 (4.17)18.2507
2000's6 (25.00)29.6817
2010's15 (62.50)24.3611
2020's2 (8.33)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Philpott, HT1
McDougall, JJ1
Pelletier, JP1
Raynauld, JP1
Dorais, M1
Bessette, L1
Dokoupilova, E1
Morin, F1
Pavelka, K1
Paiement, P1
Martel-Pelletier, J1
Jin, Y1
Smith, C1
Hu, L1
Coutant, DE1
Whitehurst, K1
Phipps, K1
McNearney, TA1
Yang, X1
Ackermann, B1
Pottanat, T1
Landschulz, W1
Tang, C1
Dong, X1
He, W1
Cheng, S1
Chen, Y1
Huang, Y1
Yin, B1
Sheng, Y1
Zhou, J1
Wu, X1
Zeng, F1
Li, Z1
Liang, F1
Cai, G1
Li, Y1
I Han, R1
Wang, F1
Wang, G1
He, C1
Jia, D1
Wang, K1
Ma, W1
Xiao, C1
Song, E1
Chen, G1
Yu, Y1
Shukla, AK1
Jhaj, R1
Miroux-Catarino, A1
Silva, L1
Amaro, C1
Ferreira, ML1
Viana, I1
Asay, JL1
Boyer, KA2
Andriacchi, TP2
Schnitzer, TJ1
Ekman, EF1
Spierings, EL1
Greenberg, HS1
Smith, MD1
Brown, MT1
West, CR1
Verburg, KM1
Fatemi, G1
Kermani, TA1
Zeng, C1
Wei, J1
Li, H1
Wang, YL1
Xie, DX1
Yang, T1
Gao, SG1
Li, YS1
Luo, W1
Lei, GH1
Oh, EH1
Shin, JM1
Hong, JH1
Kim, JS1
Ro, YS1
Ko, JY1
Shaughnessy, AF1
Kivitz, A1
Fairfax, M1
Sheldon, EA1
Xiang, Q1
Jones, BA1
Gammaitoni, AR1
Gould, EM1
Kellner, H1
Schroer, WC1
Diesfeld, PJ1
LeMarr, AR1
Reedy, ME1
Morito, H1
Ogawa, K1
Kobayashi, N1
Fukumoto, T1
Asada, H1
Angst, MS1
Asay, J1
Giori, NJ1
Malhi, H1
Atac, B1
Daly, AK1
Gupta, S1
Battisti, WP1
Katz, NP1
Weaver, AL1
Matsumoto, AK1
Kivitz, AJ1
Polis, AB1
Geba, GP1
Rattray, B1
Nugent, DJ1
Young, G1
Bianchi, M1
Broggini, M1
Balzarini, P1
Franchi, S1
Sacerdote, P1
Fleischmann, R1
Tannenbaum, H1
Patel, NP1
Notter, M1
Sallstig, P1
Reginster, JY1
Miller, JL1

Clinical Trials (5)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
An International, Multicentre, Double-blind, Randomised Study of the Effect of Diacerein vs Celecoxib on Symptoms and Structural Changes in Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis Patients as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging[NCT02688400]Phase 3380 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Completed
A Single- and Multiple-Ascending Dose, Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of LY3127760 in Healthy Subjects[NCT01968070]Phase 180 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
MEASURES OF GAIT AND SELF-REPORTED PAIN IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE: A RANDOMIZED, SINGLE-BLIND WASHOUT, DOUBLE-BLIND TREATMENT, DOUBLE DUMMY CROSS-OVER PILOT TRIAL USING PLACEBO, OXYCODONE AND CELECOXIB (A9011030)[NCT00484718]Phase 46 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-17Terminated (stopped due to See termination reason in detailed description.)
A PHASE 3, MULTI-CENTER, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, CONTROLLED STUDY OF THE LONG-TERM ANALGESIC EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TANEZUMAB ALONE OR IN COMBINATION WITH NON-STEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORY DRUGS (NSAIDS) VERSUS NSAIDS ALONE IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS[NCT00809354]Phase 32,720 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-12Terminated (stopped due to See termination reason in detailed description.)
A 52-week, International, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel-group Clinical Trial to Compare Retention on Treatment, Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Lumiracoxib 100 mg od, Lumiracoxib 100 mg Bid and Celecoxib 200 mg od in [NCT00145301]Phase 33,036 participants Interventional2004-09-30Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Absolute Changes From Baseline in Pain Visual Analogue Scale

Absolute Changes from Baseline in Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): 0-10 cm; 10 = worse (NCT02688400)
Timeframe: Day 182 or early termination

Interventionscore (Mean)
Diacerein-2.34
Celecoxib-2.46

Cartilage Volume Loss From Baseline in the Lateral Compartment Using MRI

Relative cartilage volume loss from baseline in the lateral compartment of the knne using MRI (NCT02688400)
Timeframe: baseline and 728 days

Interventionpercentage of volume loss (Mean)
Diacerein-4.4
Celecoxib-4.1

Cartilage Volume Loss From Baseline in the Medial Compartment Using MRI

Relative cartilage volume loss from baseline in the medial compartment of the knee using MRI (NCT02688400)
Timeframe: baseline and 728 days

Interventionpercentage of volume loss (Mean)
Diacerein-4.8
Celecoxib-6.0

Change Form Baseline in WOMAC A Pain Subscale

"Change form baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) A pain subscale after 182 days of treatment.~WOMAC A pain subscale: 0 - 50 cm; 50 = worse" (NCT02688400)
Timeframe: baseline and 182 days

Interventioncm (Mean)
Diacerein-11.14
Celecoxib-11.82

Change From Baseline in Global Stiffness Using WOMAC Subscale

Relative Change from baseline in global stiffness using WOMAC subscale (NCT02688400)
Timeframe: baseline and 728 days

Interventionpercentage of change in WOMACStifness sc (Mean)
Diacerein-24.3
Celecoxib-38.1

Change From Baseline in Synovitis (Synovial Membrane Thickness) Using MRI

Absolute Change from baseline in synovitis (synovial membrane thickness) in the global knee using MRI (NCT02688400)
Timeframe: baseline and 728 days

Interventionmm (Mean)
Diacerein0.24
Celecoxib0.27

Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale Pain (VAS-Huskisson's)

Relative change from baseline in Visual Analogue Scale pain (VAS-Huskisson's) (NCT02688400)
Timeframe: baseline and 728 days

InterventionPercentage of change in VAS score (Mean)
Diacerein-31.4
Celecoxib-37.6

Change From Baseline in WOMAC A Pain Subscale

Relative mean change from baseline in WOMAC Pain subscore (NCT02688400)
Timeframe: baseline and 728 days

Interventionpercentage of change in WOMAC Pain score (Mean)
Diacerein-26.2
Celecoxib-37.1

Consumption of Acetaminophen

Overall Daily number of tablets taken during the 6 month study (NCT02688400)
Timeframe: Day 182 or early termination

Interventiontablets (Mean)
Diacerein1.06
Celecoxib0.91

OARSI Responders

Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Responders (NCT02688400)
Timeframe: Day 182 or early termination

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Diacerein99
Celecoxib97

Assessment of Joint Swelling, Effusion or Both

Assessment of Joint Swelling, joint Effusion or Both (NCT02688400)
Timeframe: Day 182 or early termination

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Joint SwellingJoint EffusionJoint Swelling and Effusion
Celecoxib483723
Diacerein473719

Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity

Change from baseline in global assessment of disease activity was assessed using a VAS scale (0-10cm; 10=worse) (NCT02688400)
Timeframe: Day 182 or early termination

,
Interventionscore (Mean)
Patient's Global AssessmentInvestigator's Global Assessment
Celecoxib-1.97-2.65
Diacerein-1.81-2.02

Change From Baseline in WOMAC OA Scores

"Absolute Changes from Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) after 182 days of treatment.~WOMAC scale: 0 - 240 cm; 240 = worse - Intention-To-Treat (N=370) Pain subscale: 0-50cm; 50 = worse; Stifness subscale: 0-20cm; 20 = worse; Function subscale: 0-170cm; 170 = worse Absolute changes in WOMAC scores: <0 = improvement; 0 = stable; >0 = worsening" (NCT02688400)
Timeframe: Day 182 or early termination

,
Interventionscore (Mean)
Total ScorePain ScoreStiffness ScorePhysical Function Score
Celecoxib-42.9-9.60-3.99-29.3
Diacerein-41.0-10.03-3.56-27.2

Global Assessment of Response to Therapy

Between group comparison in Patient's and Investigator's Global Assessment of Response to Therapy using a 0-10 cm disease activity VAS scale: 0 cm = very well; 10 cm = very poorly (NCT02688400)
Timeframe: Day 182 or early termination

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Patient's Global AssessementInvestigator's Global Assessment
Celecoxib3.613.35
Diacerein3.893.85

Quality of Life SF-36

Absolute Changes from Baseline in Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores from the Quality of Life questionnaire SF-36. Scale range for each component (PCS and MCS): minimum = 0, maximum = 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Absolute changes in each component (PCS and MCS): >0 = improvement; 0 = stable; <0 = worsening. (NCT02688400)
Timeframe: Day 182 or early termination

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Physical Component SummaryMental Component Summary
Celecoxib4.57-0.14
Diacerein2.461.56

Number of Participants With One or More Serious Adverse Event(s) (SAEs) Considered by the Investigator to be Related to Study Drug Administration

Data presented are the number of participants who experienced SAEs considered by the investigator to be related to study drug administration. A summary of SAEs and all other non-serious Adverse Event(s) (AEs), regardless of causality, is located in the Reported Adverse Event module. (NCT01968070)
Timeframe: Baseline to Study Completion (Up To Day 42)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Part 1: Placebo0
Part 1: 20 mg LY31277600
Part 1: 60 mg LY31277600
Part 1: 200 mg LY31277600
Part 1: 600 mg LY31277600
Part 1: 600 mg LY3127760 (Fasted)0
Part 1: 900 mg LY31277600
Part 2: Placebo0
Part 2: 20 mg LY31277600
Part 2: 60 mg LY31277600
Part 2: 200 mg LY31277600
Part 2: 300 mg LY31277600
Part 2: 400 mg Celecoxib0

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Concentration Curve Versus Time Curve From Zero to Infinity (AUC 0-∞) of Single Dose LY3127760

(NCT01968070)
Timeframe: Day 1: -1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 96, and 144 Hours

Interventionnanograms•hour/milliliter (ng•hr/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Part 1: 20 mg LY3127760NA
Part 1: 60 mg LY31277603010
Part 1: 200 mg LY312776017200
Part 1: 600 mg LY312776040000
Part 1: 600 mg LY3127760 (Fasted)47400
Part 1: 900 mg LY312776071900

PK: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve During One Dosing Interval [AUC-tau (τ)] of Multiple Doses LY3127760

AUC-tau (τ) where τ is 24-hours for the 20 mg, 60 mg, and 200 mg cohorts, and 12-hours for the 300 mg cohort. (NCT01968070)
Timeframe: Day 28: -1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 Hours

Interventionng•hr/ml (Geometric Mean)
Part 2: 20 mg LY31277601020
Part 2: 60 mg LY31277604350
Part 2: 200 mg LY312776011300
Part 2: 300 mg LY312776019700

PK: Cmax of Multiple Doses LY3127760

(NCT01968070)
Timeframe: Post last dose on Day 28: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 72, and 168 Hours

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Part 2: 20 mg LY3127760301
Part 2: 60 mg LY31277601210
Part 2: 200 mg LY31277603650
Part 2: 300 mg LY31277606170

PK: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Single Dose LY3127760

(NCT01968070)
Timeframe: Day 1: -1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 96, and 144 Hours

Interventionnanograms/milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Part 1: 20 mg LY3127760264
Part 1: 60 mg LY3127760890
Part 1: 200 mg LY31277603880
Part 1: 600 mg LY312776010300
Part 1: 600 mg LY3127760 (Fasted)18900
Part 1: 900 mg LY312776021600

PK: Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Single Dose LY3127760

(NCT01968070)
Timeframe: Day 1: -1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 96, and 144 Hours

InterventionHour (Median)
Part 1: 20 mg LY31277602.00
Part 1: 60 mg LY31277602.00
Part 1: 200 mg LY31277602.00
Part 1: 600 mg LY31277602.00
Part 1: 600 mg LY3127760 (Fasted)1.00
Part 1: 900 mg LY31277601.50

PK: Tmax of Multiple Doses LY3127760

(NCT01968070)
Timeframe: Post-last dose on Day 28: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 72, and 168 Hours

Interventionhour (Median)
Part 2: 20 mg LY31277602.00
Part 2: 60 mg LY31277601.65
Part 2: 200 mg LY31277602.00
Part 2: 300 mg LY31277602.00

Change From Baseline in Percent Impairment While Working Due to Osteoarthritis at Week 24 Assessed Using Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire- Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP): Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

The WPAI assesses work productivity and impairment. It is a 6-item questionnaire used to assess the degree to which a specified health problem affected work productivity and regular activities over the past 7 days. The questions are: Q1 = currently employed. Q2 = hours missed due to health problems. Q3 = hours missed other reasons. Q4 = hours actually worked. Q5 = degree health affected productivity while working (0-10 scale). Q6 = degree health affected regular activities (0-10 scale). Subscale scores are calculated: Percent impairment while working due to health problem: Q5/10. The computed percentage range for each sub-scale is 0-100, where higher numbers indicate greater impairment and less productivity. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionchange in percent impairment (Mean)
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-11.90
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-11.68
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-5.51
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-13.00
Naproxen 500 mg-7.35
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-17.81
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-13.01
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-9.33
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-9.63
Celecoxib 100 mg-5.81

Change From Baseline in Percent Work Time Missed Due to Osteoarthritis at Week 24 Assessed Using Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire- Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP): Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

The WPAI assesses work productivity and impairment. It is a 6-item questionnaire used to assess the degree to which a specified health problem affected work productivity and regular activities over the past 7 days. The questions (Q) are: Q1 = currently employed. Q2 = hours missed due to health problems. Q3 = hours missed other reasons. Q4 = hours actually worked. Q5 = degree health affected productivity while working (0-10 scale). Q6 = degree health affected regular activities (0-10 scale). Subscale scores are calculated: Percent work time missed due to health problem: Q2/(Q2+Q4). The computed percentage range for each sub-scale is 0-100, where higher numbers indicate greater impairment and less productivity. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionchange in percent work time missed (Mean)
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-0.88
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)0.04
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg0.63
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-0.77
Naproxen 500 mg1.11
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-2.85
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-0.42
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg1.51
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-1.64
Celecoxib 100 mg-0.61

Change From Baseline in the Percent Activity Impairment Due to Osteoarthritis at Week 24 Assessed Using Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire - Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP): Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

The WPAI assesses work productivity and impairment. It is a 6-item questionnaire used to assess the degree to which a specified health problem affected work productivity and regular activities over the past 7 days. The questions are: Q1 = currently employed. Q2 = hours missed due to health problems. Q3 = hours missed other reasons. Q4 = hours actually worked. Q5 = degree health affected productivity while working (0-10 scale). Q6 = degree health affected regular activities (0-10 scale). Subscale scores are calculated: Percent activity impairment due to health problem: Q6/10. The computed percentage range for each sub-scale is 0-100, where higher numbers indicate greater impairment and less productivity. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionchange in percent activity impairment (Mean)
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-12.30
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-15.51
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-13.55
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-14.96
Naproxen 500 mg-10.00
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-17.24
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-17.84
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-18.04
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-17.31
Celecoxib 100 mg-11.90

Change From Baseline in the Percent Overall Work Impairment Due to Osteoarthritis at Week 24 Assessed Using Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire- Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP): BOCF

The WPAI assesses work productivity and impairment. It is a 6-item questionnaire used to assess the degree to which a specified health problem affected work productivity and regular activities over the past 7 days. The questions are: Q1 = currently employed. Q2 = hours missed due to health problems. Q3 = hours missed other reasons. Q4 = hours actually worked. Q5 = degree health affected productivity while working (0-10 scale). Q6 = degree health affected regular activities (0-10 scale). Subscale scores are calculated: Percent overall work impairment due to health problem: Q2/(Q2+Q4)+[(1-Q2/(Q2+Q4))*(Q5/10)]. The computed percentage range for each sub-scale is 0-100, where higher numbers indicate greater impairment and less productivity. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionchange in percent work impairment (Mean)
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-5.40
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-1.46
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-0.75
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-1.35
Naproxen 500 mg2.09
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-10.17
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-0.22
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg1.25
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-4.30
Celecoxib 100 mg-2.29

Number of Participants Who Had Discontinued Study Due to Lack of Efficacy

(NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 56

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)23
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)23
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg22
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg15
Naproxen 500 mg40
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)19
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)21
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg15
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg18
Celecoxib 100 mg38

Number of Participants With Positive Urine or Serum Pregnancy Test

Female participants, who reported positive in urine or serum pregnancy test were reported. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 56

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)0
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)1
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg0
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg0
Naproxen 500 mg0
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)0
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)0
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg0
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg0
Celecoxib 100 mg0

Time to Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy

Time to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy was defined as the time interval from the date of study drug administration up to the date of discontinuation of participant from study due to lack of efficacy. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 56

Interventiondays (Mean)
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)319.87
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)331.69
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg394.80
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg271.89
Naproxen 500 mg306.11
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)329.79
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)314.16
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg334.84
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg324.25
Celecoxib 100 mg303.08

Amount of Rescue Medication Used

In case of inadequate pain relief for osteoarthritis, acetaminophen up to 4000 mg per day up to 3 days in a week could be taken as rescue medication. The total dosage of acetaminophen in mg used during the specified time intervals were summarized. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Weeks 1-2, 3-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16, 17-24, 25-32, 33-40, 41-48, and 49-56

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionmilligram (mg) (Mean)
Weeks 1-2Weeks 3-4Weeks 5-8Weeks 9-12Weeks 13-16Weeks 17-24Weeks 25-32Weeks 33-40Weeks 41-48Weeks 49-56
Celecoxib 100 mg3455.853281.233182.453067.563269.782816.003126.263032.173101.633035.33
Naproxen 500 mg3543.993415.522991.012919.202920.392759.902792.042755.662746.293106.46
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)3834.793769.172969.343008.852938.952725.862927.442976.373033.872770.28
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)3365.463582.772875.552955.842912.142778.552824.832900.692906.702910.73
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg3250.693011.672223.152266.132486.232370.302723.262682.352618.832842.74
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg3524.273066.652396.992415.932551.212261.932289.282361.402373.662545.36
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)3132.303255.162571.992380.782450.552261.842383.272449.872521.272840.21
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)3144.663411.932846.582863.102993.632733.432823.392810.182927.312979.89
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg2910.682672.182140.442166.232244.742235.232432.812428.512408.582511.61
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg2739.962660.112131.452291.412562.942525.712548.202608.912673.482938.47

Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 12 and 24: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

The SF-36 health survey is a self-administered questionnaire that measures each of the following 8 health domains: domain 1= general health, domain 2= physical function, domain 3= role physical, domain 4= bodily pain, domain 5= vitality, domain 6= social function, domain 7= role emotional, domain 8= mental health. Total score for each domain are scaled 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores represent better health status. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
General health at baselinePhysical function at baselineRole physical at baselineBodily pain at baselineVitality at baselineSocial function at baselineRole emotional at baselineMental health at baselineChange at Week 12: General healthChange at Week 12: Physical functionChange at Week 12: Role physicalChange at Week 12: Bodily painChange at Week 12: VitalityChange at Week 12: Social functionChange at Week 12: Role emotionalChange at Week 12: Mental healthChange at Week 24: General healthChange at Week 24: Physical functionChange at Week 24: Role physicalChange at Week 24: Bodily painChange at Week 24: VitalityChange at Week 24: Social functionChange at Week 24: Role emotionalChange at Week 24: Mental health
Celecoxib 100 mg55.6932.8143.5536.9651.5264.3163.3969.084.687.487.588.012.433.334.130.673.908.007.708.722.874.072.230.00
Naproxen 500 mg57.6135.4646.0935.7250.7862.2368.4570.343.885.766.707.833.977.410.921.572.905.757.288.871.906.162.921.52
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)56.9334.7942.8635.5751.5263.6864.0771.083.379.0510.0412.504.355.363.640.364.259.3310.4610.224.006.254.950.42
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)57.4132.7443.8835.9051.2865.9766.3570.234.6612.8812.5913.085.145.255.503.282.959.507.429.633.933.210.581.48
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg58.2735.1145.6036.4753.6366.9065.0571.075.6612.9913.7116.836.478.946.823.174.2812.0010.5013.474.155.783.390.87
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg57.9233.8844.6937.6752.5764.4767.9270.405.1414.3815.3916.536.127.764.473.044.5412.3011.5413.044.526.142.162.26
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)56.2033.4342.5934.1450.5263.1963.0270.955.4612.7013.3616.747.4110.198.233.004.0710.4010.2410.695.717.635.811.33
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)56.7632.8243.2936.9151.5865.6366.0870.423.2911.689.7311.445.685.905.082.853.0810.529.4010.735.944.013.352.31
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg56.3433.4142.6534.1151.4564.5162.6868.255.1813.8415.5117.156.328.148.633.783.4611.8310.9314.022.847.066.470.94
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg60.6634.7944.5837.8053.7368.1367.7472.203.6614.2313.1314.416.475.364.910.963.779.839.5810.413.773.212.380.95

Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Weeks 12, 24, 40 and 56: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

The SF-36 health survey is a self-administered questionnaire that measures each of the following 8 health domains: domain 1= general health, domain 2= physical function, domain 3= role physical, domain 4= bodily pain, domain 5= vitality, domain 6= social function, domain 7= role emotional, domain 8= mental health. Total score for each domain are scaled 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores represent better health status. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 40, and 56

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 12: General healthChange at Week 12: Physical functionChange at Week 12: Role physicalChange at Week 12: Bodily painChange at Week 12: VitalityChange at Week 12: Social functionChange at Week 12: Role emotionalChange at Week 12: Mental healthChange at Week 24: General healthChange at Week 24: Physical functionChange at Week 24: Role physicalChange at Week 24: Bodily painChange at Week 24: VitalityChange at Week 24: Social functionChange at Week 24: Role emotionalChange at Week 24: Mental healthChange at Week 40: General healthChange at Week 40: Physical functionChange at Week 40: Role physicalChange at Week 40: Bodily painChange at Week 40: VitalitySocial function at Week 40Change at Week 40: Role emotionalChange at Week 40: Mental healthChange at Week 56: General healthChange at Week 56: Physical functionChange at Week 56: Role physicalChange at Week 56: Bodily painChange at Week 56: VitalityChange at Week 56: Social functionChange at Week 56: Role emotionalChange at Week 56: Mental health
Celecoxib 100 mg4.687.487.588.012.433.334.130.674.458.418.279.092.403.972.760.204.097.247.588.172.672.653.410.823.996.917.288.692.082.843.510.96
Naproxen 500 mg3.8835.4646.097.833.977.410.921.573.776.437.979.192.577.322.591.383.476.237.017.112.327.231.610.493.335.957.197.472.687.231.670.41
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)3.379.0510.0412.504.355.363.640.364.5910.0011.8412.004.877.095.090.303.318.7410.5310.874.406.202.990.263.418.2510.4610.324.476.103.250.18
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)4.6632.7443.8813.085.145.255.503.283.1811.359.5311.634.343.561.561.512.4510.238.7910.733.303.211.911.412.319.198.0110.213.102.951.531.42
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg5.6612.9913.7116.836.478.946.823.174.6212.9112.4514.834.506.574.581.063.4511.7812.1313.284.176.235.471.113.7511.4812.0613.364.156.675.071.25
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg5.1433.8844.6916.536.127.764.473.044.6613.7313.0314.735.487.113.102.653.8711.9610.0012.424.454.560.761.763.6911.159.0111.923.823.990.471.53
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)5.4612.7013.3616.747.4110.198.233.004.4211.2311.7412.245.958.516.731.373.749.9111.3211.455.297.436.691.223.7510.1211.2011.524.827.736.101.10
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)3.2932.8243.2911.445.685.905.082.853.9511.7011.1412.957.175.195.222.903.4010.009.6411.275.924.054.082.163.129.959.1311.585.704.534.232.28
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg5.1813.8415.5117.156.328.148.633.783.7212.9211.8415.223.097.356.831.393.2012.3212.3813.963.246.035.981.223.1012.0711.9613.533.416.236.111.47
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg3.6634.7944.5814.416.475.364.910.963.9310.8510.7111.754.422.813.630.452.8310.4910.9810.794.422.192.800.252.5910.1910.4910.384.171.651.99-0.11

Change From Baseline in Medial Minimum Joint Space Width of the Index Knee at Week 56

(NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 56

,,,,
Interventionmillimeter (mm) (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 56
NSAID3.022-0.041
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen or Celecoxib Exposure)2.850-0.213
Tanezumab 10 mg + NSAID2.982-0.172
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen or Celecoxib Exposure)2.769-0.189
Tanezumab 5 mg + NSAID3.005-0.162

Change From Baseline in Minimum Joint Space Width of the Index Hip at Week 56

(NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 56

,,,,
Interventionmillimeter (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 56
NSAID2.724-0.028
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen or Celecoxib Exposure)2.372-0.137
Tanezumab 10 mg + NSAID2.195-0.136
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen or Celecoxib Exposure)2.447-0.075
Tanezumab 5 mg + NSAID2.346-0.240

Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48 and 56: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

The Neuropathy Impairment Score is the sum of scores over all 37 items from both the left and right side. The neurological impairment score assessed strength of groups of muscles of the head and neck, upper limbs and lower limbs, deep tendon reflexes and sensation (tactile, vibration, joint position sense, and pin prick) of index fingers and great toes through neurological examination. NIS calculated scoring muscle weakness (0=normal, 1=25% weak, 2=50% weak, 3=75% week, 3.25= move against gravity, 3.5=movement gravity eliminated, 3.75= muscle flicker no movement, 4=paralysis), scoring reflexes (0=normal, 1=reduced. 2=absent), scoring sensation (0=normal, 1=decreased, 2=absent). For NIS possible overall score (combined of both left and right sides of each domain), ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 244 (maximum impairment), higher scores indicated increased/more neuropathic deficits. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48 and 56

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 16Change at Week 24Change at Week 32Change at Week 40Change at Week 48Change at Week 56
Celecoxib 100 mg2.18-0.34-0.13-0.22-0.28-0.34-0.36-0.34-0.39-0.36-0.41
Naproxen 500 mg2.31-0.11-0.08-0.12-0.26-0.18-0.31-0.32-0.40-0.43-0.46
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)2.09-0.29-0.30-0.35-0.50-0.56-0.38-0.56-0.50-0.52-0.44
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)2.56-0.25-0.46-0.46-0.43-0.48-0.57-0.57-0.55-0.58-0.53
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg2.08-0.33-0.40-0.33-0.26-0.30-0.22-0.26-0.33-0.34-0.43
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg2.54-0.16-0.33-0.38-0.65-0.58-0.60-0.53-0.49-0.65-0.58
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)2.04-0.11-0.21-0.32-0.53-0.43-0.35-0.44-0.41-0.44-0.41
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)2.64-0.20-0.37-0.49-0.52-0.77-0.73-0.56-0.50-0.43-0.48
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg2.24-0.14-0.40-0.53-0.69-0.79-0.90-0.93-0.50-0.87-0.89
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg1.93-0.30-0.20-0.25-0.38-0.35-0.44-0.52-0.32-0.38-0.45

Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48 and 56: Observed Data

The Neuropathy Impairment Score is the sum of scores over all 37 items from both the left and right side. The neurological impairment score assessed strength of groups of muscles of the head and neck, upper limbs and lower limbs, deep tendon reflexes and sensation (tactile, vibration, joint position sense, and pin prick) of index fingers and great toes through neurological examination. NIS calculated scoring muscle weakness (0=normal, 1=25% weak, 2=50% weak, 3=75% week, 3.25= move against gravity, 3.5=movement gravity eliminated, 3.75= muscle flicker no movement, 4=paralysis), scoring reflexes (0=normal, 1=reduced. 2=absent), scoring sensation (0=normal, 1=decreased, 2=absent). For NIS possible overall score (combined of both left and right sides of each domain), ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 244 (maximum impairment), higher scores indicated increased/more neuropathic deficits. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 56

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 16Change at Week 24Change at Week 32Change at Week 40Change at Week 48Change at Week 56
Celecoxib 100 mg2.18-0.34-0.11-0.35-0.44-0.50-0.50-0.63-0.73-0.69-0.54
Naproxen 500 mg2.31-0.11-0.11-0.12-0.29-0.26-0.43-0.39-0.42-0.48-0.36
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)2.09-0.29-0.30-0.36-0.56-0.64-0.46-0.71-0.58-0.65-0.42
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)2.56-0.25-0.42-0.42-0.38-0.41-0.50-0.53-0.47-0.81-0.70
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg2.08-0.33-0.39-0.22-0.38-0.48-0.47-0.49-0.71-0.50-0.38
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg2.54-0.16-0.29-0.30-0.62-0.58-0.57-0.47-0.38-0.80-0.10
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)2.04-0.11-0.20-0.32-0.52-0.41-0.37-0.50-0.42-0.56-0.53
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)2.64-0.20-0.40-0.47-0.53-0.81-0.78-0.56-0.61-0.55-0.30
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg2.24-0.14-0.41-0.55-0.72-0.83-0.99-1.05-1.06-1.07-1.01
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg1.93-0.30-0.18-0.22-0.34-0.38-0.57-0.78-0.63-0.67-0.83

Change From Baseline in Percent Impairment While Working Due to Osteoarthritis at Week 24 and 56 Assessed Using Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire- Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP): Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

The WPAI assesses work productivity and impairment. It is a 6-item questionnaire used to assess the degree to which a specified health problem affected work productivity and regular activities over the past 7 days. The questions are: Q1 = currently employed. Q2 = hours missed due to health problems. Q3 = hours missed other reasons. Q4 = hours actually worked. Q5 = degree health affected productivity while working (0-10 scale). Q6 = degree health affected regular activities (0-10 scale). Subscale scores are calculated: Percent impairment while working due to health problem: Q5/10. The computed percentage range for each sub-scale is 0-100, where higher numbers indicate greater impairment and less productivity. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 56

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionchange in percent impairment (Mean)
Change at Week 24Change at Week 56
Celecoxib 100 mg-5.81-5.93
Naproxen 500 mg-7.35-5.31
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-13.01-12.88
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-11.68-11.88
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-9.63-4.25
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-13.00-11.33
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-17.81-16.99
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-11.90-10.30
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-9.33-8.09
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-5.51-4.08

Change From Baseline in Percent Work Time Missed Due to Osteoarthritis at Week 24 and 56 Assessed Using Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire- Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP): Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

The WPAI assesses work productivity and impairment. It is a 6-item questionnaire used to assess the degree to which a specified health problem affected work productivity and regular activities over the past 7 days. The questions are: Q1 = currently employed. Q2 = hours missed due to health problems. Q3 = hours missed other reasons. Q4 = hours actually worked. Q5 = degree health affected productivity while working (0-10 scale). Q6 = degree health affected regular activities (0-10 scale). Subscale scores are calculated: Percent work time missed due to health problem: Q2/(Q2+Q4). The computed percentage range for each sub-scale is 0-100, where higher numbers indicate greater impairment and less productivity. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24 and 56

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionchange in percent work time missed (Mean)
Change at Week 24Change at Week 56
Celecoxib 100 mg-0.61-0.82
Naproxen 500 mg1.112.26
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-0.42-0.46
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)0.04-0.39
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-1.64-1.64
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg0.77-0.41
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-2.85-3.06
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-0.88-1.10
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg1.511.51
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg0.631.08

Change From Baseline in the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 16

"Patient global assessment of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today? Participants responded by using a 5-point likert scale ranging from 1=very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities, 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5= very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicating worse condition." (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 16
Celecoxib 100 mg3.37-0.51
Naproxen 500 mg3.38-0.53
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)3.48-0.64
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)3.41-0.63
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg3.41-0.75
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg3.39-0.72
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)3.44-0.69
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)3.39-0.54
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg3.45-0.76
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg3.39-0.61

Change From Baseline in the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

"Patient global assessment of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today? Participants responded by using a 5-point likert scale ranging from 1=very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities, 2= mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities, 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (Very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicating worse condition." (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 24
Celecoxib 100 mg-0.37-0.49-0.51-0.54-0.55
Naproxen 500 mg-0.39-0.43-0.45-0.46-0.49
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-0.33-0.75-0.69-0.75-0.59
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-0.42-0.69-0.70-0.68-0.54
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-0.26-0.75-0.79-0.83-0.74
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-0.40-0.68-0.82-0.84-0.60
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-0.46-0.68-0.63-0.71-0.57
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-0.45-0.60-0.58-0.60-0.58
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-0.45-0.80-0.81-0.77-0.67
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-0.50-0.74-0.69-0.69-0.50

Change From Baseline in the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48 and 56: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

"Patient global assessment of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today? Participants responded by using a 5-point likert scale ranging from 1=very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities, 2= mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities, 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (Very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicating worse condition." (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 56

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 16Change at Week 24Change at Week 32Change at Week 40Change at Week 48Change at Week 56
Celecoxib 100 mg-0.37-0.51-0.54-0.57-0.54-0.59-0.57-0.57-0.54-0.54
Naproxen 500 mg-0.39-0.44-0.48-0.49-0.57-0.57-0.57-0.50-0.49-0.47
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-0.33-0.76-0.74-0.84-0.73-0.69-0.66-0.67-0.62-0.56
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-0.42-0.72-0.77-0.79-0.74-0.68-0.66-0.60-0.60-0.55
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-0.26-0.74-0.81-0.86-0.77-0.77-0.66-0.66-0.59-0.58
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-0.40-0.72-0.86-0.91-0.79-0.69-0.68-0.56-0.48-0.46
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-0.46-0.70-0.68-0.77-0.76-0.66-0.63-0.61-0.53-0.51
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-0.45-0.60-0.63-0.67-0.63-0.69-0.60-0.58-0.53-0.53
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-0.45-0.78-0.81-0.81-0.80-0.73-0.73-0.59-0.63-0.61
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-0.50-0.76-0.75-0.78-0.72-0.64-0.60-0.53-0.51-0.49

Change From Baseline in the Percent Activity Impairment Due to Osteoarthritis at Week 24 and 56 Assessed Using Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire - Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP): Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

The WPAI assesses work productivity and impairment. It is a 6-item questionnaire used to assess the degree to which a specified health problem affected work productivity and regular activities over the past 7 days. The questions are: Q1 = currently employed. Q2 = hours missed due to health problems. Q3 = hours missed other reasons. Q4 = hours actually worked. Q5 = degree health affected productivity while working (0-10 scale). Q6 = degree health affected regular activities (0-10 scale). Subscale scores are calculated: Percent activity impairment due to health problem: Q6/10. The computed percentage range for each sub-scale is 0-100, where higher numbers indicate greater impairment and less productivity. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24, and 56

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionchange in percent activity impairment (Mean)
Change at Week 24Change at Week 56
Celecoxib 100 mg-11.90-11.19
Naproxen 500 mg-10.00-9.32
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-17.84-15.76
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-15.51-14.77
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-17.31-15.86
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-14.96-13.20
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-17.24-15.39
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-12.30-12.12
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-18.04-18.04
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-13.55-12.19

Change From Baseline in the Percent Overall Work Impairment Due to Osteoarthritis at Week 24 and 56 Assessed Using Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire- Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP): LOCF

The WPAI assesses work productivity and impairment. It is a 6-item questionnaire used to assess the degree to which a specified health problem affected work productivity and regular activities over the past 7 days. The questions are: Q1 = currently employed. Q2 = hours missed due to health problems. Q3 = hours missed other reasons. Q4 = hours actually worked. Q5 = degree health affected productivity while working (0-10 scale). Q6 = degree health affected regular activities (0-10 scale). Subscale scores are calculated: Percent overall work impairment due to health problem: Q2/(Q2+Q4)+[(1-Q2/(Q2+Q4))*(Q5/10)]. The computed percentage range for each sub-scale is 0-100, where higher numbers indicate greater impairment and less productivity. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 56

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionchange in percent work impairment (Mean)
Change at Week 24Change at Week 56
Celecoxib 100 mg-2.29-3.02
Naproxen 500 mg2.094.11
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-0.22-1.01
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-1.46-1.88
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-4.30-4.30
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-1.35-0.85
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-10.17-10.32
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-5.40-6.08
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg1.251.25
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-0.750.77

Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16

WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale was a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 16
Celecoxib 100 mg6.29-1.48
Naproxen 500 mg6.32-1.34
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)6.44-2.12
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)6.50-1.97
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg6.27-2.41
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg6.33-2.26
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)6.49-2.11
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)6.39-1.80
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg6.41-2.28
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg6.52-2.09

Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale was a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 24
Celecoxib 100 mg-0.93-1.09-1.15-1.40-1.63
Naproxen 500 mg-0.90-1.14-1.13-1.23-1.32
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-0.74-1.78-2.01-2.20-2.04
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-1.00-1.87-2.08-1.95-1.82
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-0.86-2.03-2.36-2.47-2.29
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-0.89-1.98-2.18-2.34-1.95
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-1.01-1.69-1.83-2.15-1.81
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-0.96-1.68-1.68-1.86-1.65
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-1.08-2.07-2.23-2.28-2.10
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-1.27-2.09-2.10-2.26-1.83

Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48 and 56: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale was a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 56

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 16Change at Week 24Change at Week 32Change at Week 40Change at Week 48Change at Week 56
Celecoxib 100 mg-0.93-1.10-1.17-1.40-1.50-1.69-1.62-1.54-1.45-1.48
Naproxen 500 mg-0.90-1.15-1.17-1.32-1.44-1.54-1.62-1.44-1.40-1.36
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-0.74-1.73-2.07-2.32-2.23-2.25-2.14-1.99-1.93-1.72
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-1.00-1.92-2.20-2.14-2.19-2.12-2.08-1.94-1.93-1.86
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-0.86-2.00-2.34-2.51-2.46-2.39-2.14-2.18-2.03-2.02
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-0.89-2.05-2.36-2.56-2.56-2.33-2.33-2.12-2.08-2.03
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-1.01-1.76-1.92-2.29-2.27-2.05-2.02-1.98-1.86-1.83
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-0.96-1.66-1.76-2.04-2.00-2.04-1.94-1.90-1.86-1.84
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-1.08-2.04-2.22-2.32-2.34-2.21-2.20-1.98-2.05-1.92
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-1.27-2.12-2.26-2.45-2.36-2.20-2.10-1.88-1.86-1.84

Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 16

WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip).The WOMAC physical function subscale was comprised of 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse physical function. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse physical function. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 16
Celecoxib 100 mg6.47-1.42
Naproxen 500 mg6.32-1.28
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)6.58-2.09
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)6.47-1.84
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg6.39-2.41
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg6.39-2.18
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)6.67-2.13
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)6.46-1.80
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg6.57-2.27
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg6.57-2.12

Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip).The WOMAC physical function subscale was comprised of 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse physical function. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse physical function. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 24
Celecoxib 100 mg-0.90-1.07-1.13-1.36-1.57
Naproxen 500 mg-0.90-1.01-1.07-1.23-1.30
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-0.95-1.78-2.00-2.13-2.00
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-1.13-1.79-2.01-1.87-1.76
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-1.02-2.00-2.30-2.46-2.33
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-1.06-2.00-2.15-2.29-1.96
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-1.18-1.73-1.89-2.23-1.92
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-1.10-1.71-1.62-1.85-1.66
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-1.21-1.97-2.15-2.34-2.08
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-1.44-2.04-2.05-2.18-1.76

Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 32, 40, 48 and 56: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip).The WOMAC physical function subscale was comprised of 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse physical function. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse physical function. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 56

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 24Change at Week 32Change at Week 40Change at Week 48Change at Week 56
Celecoxib 100 mg6.47-0.90-1.09-1.14-1.36-1.62-1.57-1.52-1.44-1.45
Naproxen 500 mg6.32-0.90-1.04-1.11-1.31-1.49-1.53-1.44-1.39-1.34
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)6.58-0.95-1.75-2.08-2.31-2.24-2.16-2.04-1.97-1.78
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)6.47-1.13-1.84-2.13-2.08-2.08-2.01-1.90-1.93-1.84
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg6.39-1.02-1.91-2.29-2.50-2.44-2.20-2.18-2.05-2.05
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg6.39-1.06-2.06-2.33-2.50-2.29-2.25-2.04-1.96-1.87
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)6.67-1.18-1.81-2.02-2.35-2.14-2.08-2.06-1.94-1.90
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)6.46-1.10-1.70-1.69-2.02-2.04-1.87-1.87-1.82-1.82
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg6.57-1.21-1.95-2.13-2.37-2.20-2.22-2.00-2.03-1.92
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg6.57-1.44-2.08-2.23-2.40-2.22-2.15-1.95-1.90-1.88

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). Each item is scored on a 0 to 10 NRS scale, where higher scores indicate higher pain/stiffness or worse function. WOMAC average score was calculated as the mean of 3 WOMAC subscale scores (pain, physical function and stiffness). Total score range was 0 (no response) to 10 (worse response), where higher score indicated worse response. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 16Change at Week 24
Celecoxib 100 mg6.38-0.89-1.06-1.14-1.33-1.42-1.53
Naproxen 500 mg6.41-0.93-1.13-1.15-1.27-1.34-1.34
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)6.54-0.98-1.87-2.08-2.24-2.17-2.05
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)6.54-1.15-1.92-2.11-1.98-1.98-1.84
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg6.33-0.99-2.10-2.42-2.55-2.48-2.33
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg6.38-1.04-2.06-2.22-2.35-2.28-1.99
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)6.60-1.17-1.79-1.93-2.26-2.13-1.90
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)6.45-1.13-1.74-1.68-1.90-1.84-1.70
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg6.48-1.23-2.08-2.23-2.35-2.30-2.09
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg6.60-1.46-2.15-2.14-2.31-2.17-1.87

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48 and 56: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). Each item is scored on a 0 to 10 NRS scale, where higher scores indicate higher pain/stiffness or worse function. WOMAC average score was calculated as the mean of 3 WOMAC subscale scores (pain, physical function and stiffness). Total score range was 0 (no response) to 10 (worse response), where higher score indicated worse response. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 56

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 16Change at Week 24Change at Week 32Change at Week 40Change at Week 48Change at Week 56
Celecoxib 100 mg-0.89-1.07-1.16-1.33-1.45-1.58-1.53-1.49-1.40-1.42
Naproxen 500 mg-0.93-1.15-1.20-1.37-1.45-1.58-1.64-1.51-1.48-1.43
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-0.98-1.84-2.15-2.37-2.29-2.28-2.20-2.07-2.00-1.81
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-1.15-1.98-2.25-2.20-2.24-2.18-2.10-1.99-2.02-1.93
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-0.99-2.07-2.41-2.59-2.53-2.46-2.22-2.20-2.08-2.07
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-1.04-2.13-2.41-2.58-2.57-2.36-2.35-2.14-2.08-1.99
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-1.17-1.87-2.03-2.40-2.31-2.16-2.10-2.05-1.94-1.90
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-1.13-1.74-1.78-2.08-2.05-2.10-1.96-1.94-1.91-1.89
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-1.23-2.06-2.22-2.40-2.36-2.22-2.30-2.05-2.10-1.98
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-1.46-2.18-2.31-2.52-2.48-2.30-2.20-1.99-1.96-1.93

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

"WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). Participants responded about the amount of pain they experienced when going up or down stairs by answering the question: How much pain have you had when going up or down the stairs? Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain." (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 16Change at Week 24
Celecoxib 100 mg7.52-1.05-1.29-1.33-1.50-1.66-1.73
Naproxen 500 mg7.40-0.94-1.22-1.34-1.37-1.53-1.51
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)7.59-1.23-2.07-2.26-2.52-2.35-2.28
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)7.68-1.34-2.13-2.32-2.16-2.20-2.01
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg7.54-1.37-2.36-2.65-2.79-2.76-2.63
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg7.50-1.36-2.32-2.53-2.67-2.53-2.22
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)7.80-1.41-2.05-2.17-2.45-2.39-2.02
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)7.55-1.29-1.78-1.79-2.09-1.99-1.82
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg7.55-1.45-2.43-2.48-2.48-2.52-2.47
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg7.72-1.67-2.46-2.41-2.49-2.35-2.02

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48 and 56: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

"WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). Participants responded about the amount of pain they experienced when going up or down stairs by answering the question: How much pain have you had when going up or down the stairs? Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain." (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 56

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 16Change at Week 24Change at Week 32Change at Week 40Change at Week 48Change at Week 56
Celecoxib 100 mg-1.05-1.30-1.35-1.55-1.75-1.84-1.78-1.76-1.64-1.71
Naproxen 500 mg-0.94-1.26-1.35-1.47-1.63-1.74-1.70-1.51-1.48-1.43
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-1.23-2.05-2.37-2.69-2.53-2.57-2.50-2.28-2.24-1.98
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-1.34-2.20-2.48-2.40-2.47-2.38-2.28-2.21-2.17-2.08
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-1.37-2.37-2.71-2.90-2.89-2.83-2.55-2.47-2.31-2.34
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-1.36-2.41-2.75-2.94-2.88-2.66-2.62-2.41-2.29-2.24
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-1.41-2.14-2.27-2.64-2.62-2.35-2.27-2.31-2.20-2.16
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-1.29-1.80-1.90-2.29-2.23-2.26-2.12-2.06-1.99-2.00
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-1.45-2.43-2.50-2.57-2.59-2.60-2.52-2.26-2.30-2.16
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-1.67-2.51-2.62-2.76-2.70-2.48-2.43-2.09-2.10-2.10

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

"WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Participants responded about the amount of pain they experienced when walking on a flat surface by answering the question: How much pain have you had when walking on a flat surface?. Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain." (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 16Change at Week 24
Celecoxib 100 mg6.10-0.86-0.95-1.11-1.35-1.38-1.55
Naproxen 500 mg6.12-0.80-1.04-1.05-1.10-1.23-1.20
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)6.30-0.68-1.64-1.84-2.02-1.91-1.88
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)6.37-1.02-1.88-1.95-1.78-1.77-1.65
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg6.14-0.86-1.93-2.26-2.25-2.22-2.06
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg6.13-0.87-1.92-2.09-2.22-2.19-1.83
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)6.28-1.04-1.49-1.67-2.04-1.94-1.63
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)6.22-1.05-1.67-1.57-1.74-1.71-1.56
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg6.21-1.01-1.88-2.11-2.20-2.08-1.96
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg6.34-1.31-1.98-1.93-2.15-1.95-1.64

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48 and 56: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

"WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Participants responded about the amount of pain they experienced when walking on a flat surface by answering the question: How much pain have you had when walking on a flat surface?. Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain." (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 56

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 16Change at Week 24Change at Week 32Change at Week 40Change at Week 48Change at Week 56
Celecoxib 100 mg-0.86-0.96-1.13-1.36-1.42-1.64-1.56-1.40-1.33-1.36
Naproxen 500 mg-0.80-1.04-1.07-1.20-1.33-1.36-1.45-1.23-1.22-1.15
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-0.68-1.59-1.85-2.08-1.98-1.97-1.80-1.75-1.64-1.42
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-1.02-1.92-2.09-1.98-2.00-1.94-1.80-1.78-1.72-1.64
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-0.86-1.91-2.22-2.27-2.25-2.15-1.89-1.89-1.74-1.72
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-0.87-1.99-2.26-2.41-2.44-2.15-2.12-1.77-1.78-1.73
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-1.04-1.54-1.73-2.11-2.03-1.79-1.78-1.72-1.62-1.61
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-1.05-1.65-1.65-1.93-1.93-1.95-1.78-1.69-1.63-1.65
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-1.01-1.84-2.06-2.20-2.11-2.04-1.96-1.73-1.79-1.67
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-1.31-2.01-2.08-2.32-2.20-1.98-1.91-1.69-1.68-1.68

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC stiffness subscale was a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced due to osteoarthritis of the index joint (knee or hip) during the past 48 hours. Stiffness was defined as a sensation of decreased ease of movement in the index joint (knee or hip). It was calculated as mean of the scores from 2 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (worst stiffness), with higher scores indicate more stiffness. Total score range for WOMAC stiffness subscale score was 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (worst stiffness), where higher scores indicated more stiffness. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 16Change at Week 24
Celecoxib 100 mg6.39-0.82-1.00-1.13-1.23-1.34-1.38
Naproxen 500 mg6.60-1.02-1.23-1.29-1.40-1.42-1.46
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)6.58-1.21-2.05-2.22-2.36-2.28-2.10
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)6.66-1.32-2.10-2.26-2.14-2.15-1.96
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg6.33-1.11-2.25-2.60-2.72-2.62-2.39
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg6.42-1.19-2.19-2.31-2.42-2.40-2.04
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)6.62-1.35-1.94-2.02-2.38-2.14-1.97
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)6.50-1.35-1.85-1.76-1.98-1.93-1.80
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg6.47-1.41-2.15-2.28-2.42-2.35-2.08
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg6.70-1.65-2.31-2.26-2.49-2.31-1.98

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48 and 56: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC stiffness subscale was a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint (knee or hip) during the past 48 hours. Stiffness was defined as a sensation of decreased ease of movement in the index joint (knee or hip). It was calculated as mean of the scores from 2 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (worst stiffness), with higher scores indicate more stiffness. Total score range for WOMAC stiffness subscale score was 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (worst stiffness), where higher scores indicated more stiffness. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 56

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 16Change at Week 24Change at Week 32Change at Week 40Change at Week 48Change at Week 56
Celecoxib 100 mg-0.82-1.01-1.15-1.24-1.38-1.43-1.41-1.43-1.34-1.34
Naproxen 500 mg-1.02-1.26-1.35-1.52-1.58-1.75-1.80-1.69-1.69-1.63
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-1.21-2.03-2.30-2.49-2.41-2.37-2.31-2.20-2.10-1.94
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-1.32-2.17-2.43-2.39-2.44-2.36-2.23-2.15-2.23-2.10
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-1.11-2.22-2.58-2.76-2.68-2.55-2.31-2.26-2.17-2.14
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-1.19-2.27-2.52-2.68-2.70-2.46-2.48-2.24-2.20-2.08
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)-1.35-2.04-2.15-2.55-2.35-2.28-2.18-2.10-2.01-1.97
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)-1.35-1.88-1.88-2.18-2.16-2.22-2.07-2.05-2.03-1.99
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg-1.41-2.13-2.30-2.49-2.43-2.23-2.46-2.16-2.22-2.10
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg-1.65-2.34-2.44-2.71-2.64-2.48-2.36-2.13-2.11-2.07

Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response

Human serum ADA samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti--tanezumab antibodies by using a semi quantitative enzyme -linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Participants tested positive for ADA response on at least one post-baseline visit were reported. Participants with ADA titer level >=4.32 for tanezumab were considered ADA positive. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 16, 40, 24, and 56

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BaselineWeek 16Week 24Week 40Week 56
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen or Celecoxib Exposure)23222
Tanezumab 10 mg + NSAID20122
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen or Celecoxib Exposure)35423
Tanezumab 5 mg + NSAID44151

Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale was a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Number of participants who experienced reduction (as percent) of >0% to >=100% from Baseline in WOMAC pain subscale scores at Week 16 were reported. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>0%>=10%>=20%>=30%>=40%>=50%>=60%>=70%>=80%>=90%100%
Celecoxib 100 mg170150124100816244251375
Naproxen 500 mg172153130102815639221473
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)18216715012411489684634158
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)201184162135117947550291811
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg1941841621381231087963503211
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg2031941741541321048271452410
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)17716214212210889705131195
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)19817914812710378534329174
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg19317615113511596725636207
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg199183158139118966142311912

Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale was a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Number of participants who experienced reduction (as percent) of >0% to >=100% from Baseline in WOMAC pain subscale scores at Week 16 were reported. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>0%>=10%>=20%>=30%>=40%>=50%>=60%>=70%>=80%>=90%100%
Celecoxib 100 mg188162134106846545251375
Naproxen 500 mg201175144112886143241673
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)20218416713712093725038178
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)2342101831501291037952301912
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg2081971731451271118063503211
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg2452292011761501199278482612
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)19717915713311797775332205
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)22820316714011486584631174
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg208188163145120100755837207
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg2332151811591321056847362114

Number of Participants With Intravenous (IV) Doses of Study Medication

Number of participants are reported based on the maximum number of IV doses of either tanezumab or placebo received. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 48

,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Number of IV Doses: 1Number of IV Doses: 2Number of IV Doses: 3Number of IV Doses: 4Number of IV Doses: 5Number of IV Doses: 6Number of IV Doses: 7
Celecoxib 100 mg22241237734444
Naproxen 500 mg35302144743346
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)30191635783442
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)36182851704441
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg21122248723841
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg44162155743147
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)25151339824141
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)32192741714550
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg22121844844333
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg36191751664546

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to Week 64 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 64

,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AEsSAEs
Celecoxib 100 mg17221
Naproxen 500 mg19222
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)18823
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)21123
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg19334
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg20730
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)20222
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)20322
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg18526
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg20528

Percentage of Participants Who Used Rescue Medication: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

In case of inadequate pain relief for osteoarthritis, acetaminophen up to 4000 mg per day for maximum of 3 days within a week could be taken as rescue medication. Percentage of participants with any use of rescue medication during each study interval were summarized. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Weeks 1-2, 3-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16, 17-24, 25-32, 33-40, 41-48 and 49-56

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Weeks 1-2Weeks 3-4Weeks 5-8Weeks 9-12Weeks 13-16Weeks 17-24Weeks 25-32Weeks 33-40Weeks 41-48Weeks 49-56
Celecoxib 100 mg63.166.067.668.470.769.174.271.572.371.5
Naproxen 500 mg63.063.069.866.269.475.870.871.971.572.6
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)64.464.461.063.962.364.367.567.567.970.0
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)59.461.763.864.262.564.664.966.366.069.1
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg62.761.164.359.359.765.666.465.265.068.1
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg63.060.758.960.357.864.563.164.164.867.6
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)70.069.469.865.167.569.871.871.471.471.5
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)60.463.066.565.865.368.166.768.169.571.2
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg60.559.262.460.562.560.963.762.963.766.8
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg56.954.755.055.460.063.260.061.863.965.4

Percentage of Participants Who Used Rescue Medication: Observed Data

In case of inadequate pain relief for osteoarthritis, acetaminophen up to 4000 mg per day for maximum of 3 days within a week could be taken as rescue medication. Percentage of participants with any use of rescue medication during each study interval were summarized. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Weeks 1-2, 3-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16, 17-24, 25-32, 33-40, 41-48 and 49-56

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Weeks 1-2Weeks 3-4Weeks 5-8Weeks 9-12Weeks 13-16Weeks 17-24Weeks 25-32Weeks 33-40Weeks 41-48Weeks 49-56
Celecoxib 100 mg63.266.066.765.968.866.371.261.665.177.5
Naproxen 500 mg61.962.368.864.868.176.669.573.766.078.2
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)64.264.961.264.561.365.170.271.270.774.1
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)59.361.864.765.363.767.067.369.562.571.1
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg62.560.363.957.157.866.266.261.852.579.3
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg62.960.657.961.457.866.059.661.860.974.2
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)69.768.468.062.964.267.066.563.864.175.9
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)60.563.367.767.866.768.966.064.466.769.2
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg60.259.362.560.362.359.463.564.863.372.4
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg57.655.155.156.362.164.759.158.259.262.9

Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24: BOCF

WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale was a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Percentage of participants who experienced an improvement (reduction) of >=30%, >=50%, >=70%, or >=90% in the WOMAC pain subscale scores from Baseline were reported. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 2: >=30% ReductionWeek 2: >=50% ReductionWeek 2: >=70% ReductionWeek 2: >=90% ReductionWeek 4: >=30% ReductionWeek 4: >=50% ReductionWeek 4: >=70% ReductionWeek 4: >=90% ReductionWeek 8: >=30% ReductionWeek 8: >=50% ReductionWeek 8: >=70% ReductionWeek 8: >=90% ReductionWeek 12: >=30% ReductionWeek 12: >=50% ReductionWeek 12: >=70% ReductionWeek 12: >=90% ReductionWeek 16: >=30% ReductionWeek 16: >=50% ReductionWeek 16: >=70% ReductionWeek 16: >=90% ReductionWeek 24: >=30% ReductionWeek 24: >=50% ReductionWeek 24: >=70% ReductionWeek 24: >=90% Reduction
Celecoxib 100 mg24.711.05.51.631.018.47.11.030.218.89.02.736.521.69.02.439.224.39.82.741.625.911.43.9
Naproxen 500 mg22.712.85.31.129.819.56.72.529.816.78.22.134.019.57.82.836.219.97.82.536.521.311.73.5
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)22.813.86.31.241.726.011.43.945.729.916.56.752.035.819.37.948.835.018.15.946.533.518.57.1
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)26.817.18.71.445.630.012.53.149.833.816.43.846.332.816.06.347.032.817.46.344.931.717.47.3
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg26.018.58.33.150.432.719.35.555.936.223.27.158.341.723.610.654.342.524.812.653.541.323.611.8
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg24.916.17.41.847.732.317.54.249.835.121.17.754.439.323.99.854.036.524.98.446.034.421.46.0
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)28.012.67.12.439.822.413.84.344.127.213.85.148.033.519.34.748.035.020.17.542.530.315.47.5
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)28.417.55.61.140.724.611.92.143.927.713.74.245.630.214.46.344.627.415.16.040.427.714.06.7
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg30.617.37.81.249.030.216.56.351.033.718.86.353.737.620.87.152.937.622.07.847.135.321.67.5
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg35.020.46.42.952.127.515.06.849.329.618.26.453.232.118.66.849.634.315.06.844.328.216.46.4

Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale was a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Percentage of participants who experienced an improvement (reduction) of >=30 percent, >=50%, >=70%, or >=90% in the WOMAC pain subscale scores from Baseline were reported. (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 56

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 2: >=30% ReductionWeek 2: >=50% ReductionWeek 2: >=70% ReductionWeek 2: >=90% ReductionWeek 4: >=30% ReductionWeek 4: >=50% ReductionWeek 4: >=70% ReductionWeek 4: >=90% ReductionWeek 8: >=30% ReductionWeek 8: >=50% ReductionWeek 8: >=70% ReductionWeek 8: >=90% ReductionWeek 12: >=30% ReductionWeek 12: >=50% ReductionWeek 12: >=70% ReductionWeek 12: >=90% ReductionWeek 16: >=30% ReductionWeek 16: >=50% ReductionWeek 16: >=70% ReductionWeek 16: >=90% ReductionWeek 24: >=30% ReductionWeek 24: >=50% ReductionWeek 24: >=70% ReductionWeek 24: >=90% ReductionWeek 32: >=30% ReductionWeek 32: >=50% ReductionWeek 32: >=70% ReductionWeek 32: >=90% ReductionWeek 40: >=30% ReductionWeek 40: >=50% ReductionWeek 40: >=70% ReductionWeek 40: >=90% ReductionWeek 48: >=30% ReductionWeek 48: >=50% ReductionWeek 48: >=70% ReductionWeek 48: >=90% ReductionWeek 56: >=30% ReductionWeek 56: >=50% ReductionWeek 56: >=70% ReductionWeek 56: >=90% Reduction
Celecoxib 100 mg24.711.05.51.631.018.47.11.031.018.89.02.737.622.09.02.441.625.59.82.745.527.811.43.943.128.212.52.441.629.011.42.442.027.111.82.741.627.512.52.4
Naproxen 500 mg22.712.85.31.130.520.26.72.531.217.78.52.136.921.38.52.839.721.68.52.542.925.213.14.344.327.312.15.042.225.59.23.240.423.411.03.940.422.79.93.2
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)22.813.86.31.241.726.011.43.948.830.717.37.157.137.820.98.753.936.619.76.753.935.420.57.951.636.221.79.150.831.120.55.949.231.918.95.546.528.716.54.7
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)26.817.18.71.446.330.712.53.151.935.216.74.250.935.516.46.652.335.918.16.653.036.218.57.752.333.817.87.050.931.717.45.651.630.716.05.950.228.915.35.2
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg26.018.58.33.150.432.719.35.556.737.023.67.560.242.924.011.057.143.724.812.657.943.324.011.853.539.422.012.653.939.021.79.451.237.020.59.452.037.820.58.7
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg24.916.17.41.849.833.717.94.655.138.922.88.460.743.526.010.561.841.827.49.155.840.724.67.456.542.522.18.452.638.219.35.651.936.518.96.752.636.117.96.3
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)28.012.67.12.441.323.614.24.746.528.714.65.952.836.620.55.152.438.220.97.949.234.316.57.949.635.419.37.949.234.317.77.548.430.716.15.946.929.914.25.1
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)28.417.55.61.141.124.611.92.146.329.114.44.249.832.615.46.349.130.216.16.049.534.016.87.449.530.218.25.649.531.916.15.348.830.917.25.647.730.216.56.0
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg30.617.37.81.249.830.616.96.352.934.519.26.357.339.221.67.156.939.222.77.852.537.622.77.852.539.221.610.649.833.319.68.650.233.720.47.547.831.818.47.5
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg35.020.46.42.953.227.915.06.853.931.419.36.459.334.319.67.156.837.516.87.554.333.219.67.553.633.916.15.451.830.415.74.651.430.415.44.651.428.616.14.6

Percentage of Participants With Improvement of At Least 2 Points in Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

"Patient global assessment of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today? Participants responded by using a 5-point likert scale ranging from 1=very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities, 2= mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities, 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (Very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicating worse condition. Improvement signifies a decrease of at least 2 points on the 5-point scale relative to baseline value. Percentage of participants who showed an improvement of >=2 points on scale were reported." (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 2Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 24
Celecoxib 100 mg6.310.611.812.213.413.0
Naproxen 500 mg6.410.69.212.710.614.1
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)9.418.516.517.715.412.6
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)10.113.518.417.419.118.1
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg5.914.617.422.118.220.9
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg10.915.119.325.322.518.6
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)11.319.115.617.218.413.3
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)9.910.214.115.514.817.6
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg12.518.819.620.820.018.8
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg8.217.518.218.216.412.1

Percentage of Participants With Improvement of Atleast 2 Points in Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 56: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

"Patient global assessment of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today? Participants responded by using a 5-point likert scale ranging from 1=very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities, 2= mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities, 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (Very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicating worse condition. Improvement signifies a decrease of at least 2 points on the 5-point scale relative to baseline value. Percentage of participants who showed an improvement of >=2 points on scale were reported." (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 56

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 2Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 24Week 32Week 40Week 48Week 56
Celecoxib 100 mg6.311.013.013.414.615.015.015.414.615.0
Naproxen 500 mg6.410.69.913.812.016.315.514.114.513.4
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)9.418.918.520.918.115.416.515.014.611.8
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)10.114.220.520.822.622.218.817.416.715.3
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg5.914.618.223.319.422.520.220.617.417.8
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg10.916.120.727.024.221.423.218.916.115.8
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)11.320.317.219.121.116.819.118.417.214.8
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)9.910.615.116.916.520.114.414.814.414.4
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg12.518.819.621.620.820.419.218.418.818.4
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg8.217.919.320.418.915.416.413.912.913.6

Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

Participants were considered as OMERACT-OARSI responder: if the improvement from baseline to week of interest was greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent and >=2 units in WOMAC pain subscale or WOMAC physical function subscale score, or at least 2 of the following 3 being true: improvement from baseline to week of interest was >=20 percent and >=1 unit in 1) WOMAC pain subscale score, 2) WOMAC physical function subscale score, 3) PGA of osteoarthritis. WOMAC pain subscale assess amount of pain experienced (score: 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst possible pain], higher score = more pain), WOMAC physical function subscale assess degree of difficulty experienced (score: 0 [minimum difficulty] to 10 [maximum difficulty], higher score = worse physical function) and PGA of osteoarthritis (score: 1 [very good] to 5 [very poor], higher score = worse condition). (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 2Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 24
Celecoxib 100 mg32.441.042.645.347.349.2
Naproxen 500 mg31.839.739.042.945.241.1
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)33.955.557.559.155.953.5
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)35.557.658.956.153.050.9
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg33.157.565.065.763.459.4
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg36.154.558.361.160.151.0
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)39.651.653.956.655.149.8
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)40.453.049.554.052.348.1
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg39.557.459.462.159.854.7
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg43.260.760.461.456.851.4

Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

Participants were considered as OMERACT-OARSI responder: if the improvement from baseline to week of interest was >=50 percent and >=2 units in WOMAC pain subscale or WOMAC physical function subscale score, or at least 2 of the following 3 being true: improvement from baseline to week of interest was >=20 percent and >=1 unit in 1) WOMAC pain subscale score, 2) WOMAC physical function subscale score, 3) PGA of osteoarthritis. WOMAC pain subscale assess amount of pain experienced (score: 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst possible pain], higher score = more pain), WOMAC physical function subscale assess degree of difficulty experienced (score: 0 [minimum difficulty] to 10 [maximum difficulty], higher score = worse physical function) and PGA of osteoarthritis (score: 1 [very good] to 5 [very poor], higher score = worse condition). (NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 56

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 2Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 24Week 32Week 40Week 48Week 56
Celecoxib 100 mg32.441.843.847.751.255.153.149.249.249.2
Naproxen 500 mg31.841.041.046.649.548.452.350.949.550.5
Tanezumab 10 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)33.955.961.465.062.263.456.356.355.953.5
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen Exposure)35.559.062.261.859.760.157.656.357.654.9
Tanezumab 10 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg33.157.966.568.166.564.260.662.258.359.4
Tanezumab 10 mg + Naproxen 500 mg36.157.664.268.469.162.263.259.058.058.0
Tanezumab 5 mg (Celecoxib Exposure)39.653.156.360.960.558.657.458.257.456.6
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen Exposure)40.453.753.360.459.360.460.757.958.257.2
Tanezumab 5 mg + Celecoxib 100 mg39.557.861.365.664.160.562.557.458.257.0
Tanezumab 5 mg + Naproxen 500 mg43.262.565.768.265.763.261.458.957.957.5

Plasma Trough (Pre-dose) Concentration of Tanezumab

(NCT00809354)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1, Weeks 16, 24, 40, and 56

,,,
Interventionnanogram/milliliter (Mean)
Day 1Week 16Week 24Week 40Week 56
Tanezumab 10 mg (Naproxen or Celecoxib Exposure)164.068556.854545.672523.214385.733
Tanezumab 10 mg + NSAID96.4720723.316538.756527.108377.231
Tanezumab 5 mg (Naproxen or Celecoxib Exposure)48.4570222.779250.813231.840168.673
Tanezumab 5 mg + NSAID102.398255.246271.632263.049138.159

Reviews

1 review available for celecoxib and Arthralgia

ArticleYear
Effectiveness and safety of Glucosamine, chondroitin, the two in combination, or celecoxib in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee.
    Scientific reports, 2015, Nov-18, Volume: 5

    Topics: Arthralgia; Celecoxib; Chondroitin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucosamine; Humans; Odds Ratio; Oste

2015

Trials

12 trials available for celecoxib and Arthralgia

ArticleYear
An international, multicentre, double-blind, randomized study (DISSCO): effect of diacerein vs celecoxib on symptoms in knee osteoarthritis.
    Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2020, 12-01, Volume: 59, Issue:12

    Topics: Anthraquinones; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthralgia; Celecoxib; Double-Blind Method;

2020
LY3127760, a Selective Prostaglandin E4 (EP4) Receptor Antagonist, and Celecoxib: A Comparison of Pharmacological Profiles.
    Clinical and translational science, 2018, Volume: 11, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthralgia; Celecoxib; Double-

2018
Cerebral mechanism of celecoxib for treating knee pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled parallel trial.
    Trials, 2019, Jan-16, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Arthralgia; Brain; Brain Mapping; Celecoxib; China; Chronic Pain; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors

2019
Clinical efficacy of celecoxib for osteoarthritis and bone anchor assisted knee extensor reconstruction.
    Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2019, Volume: 32, Issue:1(Special)

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthralgia; Celecoxib; Female; Humans; M

2019
Repeatability of gait analysis for measuring knee osteoarthritis pain in patients with severe chronic pain.
    Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2013, Volume: 31, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthralgia; Biomechanical Phenome

2013
Efficacy and safety of tanezumab monotherapy or combined with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of knee or hip osteoarthritis pain.
    Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2015, Volume: 74, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Hum

2015
Comparison of the effectiveness and tolerability of lidocaine patch 5% versus celecoxib for osteoarthritis-related knee pain: post hoc analysis of a 12 week, prospective, randomized, active-controlled, open-label, parallel-group trial in adults.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2008, Volume: 30, Issue:12

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anesthetics, Local; Arthralgia; Celeco

2008
Benefits of prolonged postoperative cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor administration on total knee arthroplasty recovery: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
    The Journal of arthroplasty, 2011, Volume: 26, Issue:6 Suppl

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthralgia; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Celecoxib; Cyclooxygenase 2 In

2011
Sensitivity of gait parameters to the effects of anti-inflammatory and opioid treatments in knee osteoarthritis patients.
    Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2012, Volume: 30, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthralgia; Celecoxib; Cross-Over

2012
Pain management in osteoarthritis: a focus on onset of efficacy--a comparison of rofecoxib, celecoxib, acetaminophen, and nabumetone across four clinical trials.
    The journal of pain, 2004, Volume: 5, Issue:9

    Topics: Acetaminophen; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthralgia; Butano

2004
Effects of nimesulide on pain and on synovial fluid concentrations of substance P, interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 in patients with knee osteoarthritis: comparison with celecoxib.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2007, Volume: 61, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthralgia; Celecoxib; Double-Blind Method; Female; H

2007
Long-term retention on treatment with lumiracoxib 100 mg once or twice daily compared with celecoxib 200 mg once daily: a randomised controlled trial in patients with osteoarthritis.
    BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2008, Mar-07, Volume: 9

    Topics: Aged; Arthralgia; Canada; Cardiovascular Diseases; Celecoxib; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury

2008

Other Studies

11 other studies available for celecoxib and Arthralgia

ArticleYear
Combatting joint pain and inflammation by dual inhibition of monoacylglycerol lipase and cyclooxygenase-2 in a rat model of osteoarthritis.
    Arthritis research & therapy, 2020, 01-14, Volume: 22, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Arthralgia; Benzodioxoles; Celecoxib; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors

2020
Consensi: Is it a conscientious combination?
    British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2019, Volume: 85, Issue:5

    Topics: Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Arthralgia; Blood Pressure; Celecoxib; Clinical Trials as Topic

2019
Bullous fixed drug eruption induced by etoricoxib, confirmed by patch testing, with tolerance to celecoxib.
    Contact dermatitis, 2019, Volume: 81, Issue:5

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthralgia; Blister; Celecoxib; Drug Eruptions; Etoricoxib;

2019
Clinical Significance of a Positive Antinuclear Antibody Test.
    JAMA, 2015, Aug-25, Volume: 314, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Antibodies, Antinuclear; Arthralgia; Autoantibodies; Biomarkers; Celecoxib; Cyclooxygenase 2

2015
Drug-induced bullous Sweet's syndrome by celecoxib.
    The Journal of dermatology, 2016, Volume: 43, Issue:9

    Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthralgia; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biopsy; Blister; Blood Sedimentation; C-Rea

2016
Chondroitin/Glucosamine Equal to Celecoxib for Knee Osteoarthritis.
    American family physician, 2016, Jun-15, Volume: 93, Issue:12

    Topics: Arthralgia; Celecoxib; Chondroitin; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors; Drug Combinations; Education, Medic

2016
["Rheumatic pain". Joint is painfully swollen overnight].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2010, Dec-16, Volume: 152, Issue:51-52

    Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Allopurinol; Ankle Joint; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthralgia;

2010
Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome followed by persistent arthritis.
    The Journal of dermatology, 2012, Volume: 39, Issue:2

    Topics: Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Arthralgia; Arthritis; Celecoxib; Chronic Disease; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibito

2012
Warfarin and celecoxib interaction in the setting of cytochrome P450 (CYP2C9) polymorphism with bleeding complication.
    Postgraduate medical journal, 2004, Volume: 80, Issue:940

    Topics: Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Anticoagulants; Arthralgia; Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxyl

2004
Celecoxib in the treatment of haemophilic synovitis, target joints, and pain in adults and children with haemophilia.
    Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia, 2006, Volume: 12, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthralgia; Celecoxib; Child; Chronic Di

2006
Decisions loom on selective COX-2 inhibitors.
    American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 1999, Jan-15, Volume: 56, Issue:2

    Topics: Arthralgia; Arthritis; Celecoxib; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors; Humans; Lacto

1999