cefzil and Haemophilus-Infections

cefzil has been researched along with Haemophilus-Infections* in 4 studies

Reviews

1 review(s) available for cefzil and Haemophilus-Infections

ArticleYear
Pott's puffy tumor due to Haemophilus influenzae: case report and review.
    Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 1996, Volume: 23, Issue:6

    Osteomyelitis of the frontal bone may be associated with a purulent collection under the periosteum, causing swelling and edema over the forehead, a condition known as Pott's puffy tumor. We describe an 83-year-old man with a Pott's puffy tumor due to Haemophilus influenzae that was successfully treated with surgery and antibiotics. A review of 22 cases of Pott's puffy tumor shows that this condition usually occurs in children, is spread from frontal or ethmoid sinusitis, and is usually due to streptococci, staphylococci, or anaerobes. Suppurative complications such as epidural, subdural, and intracerebral abscesses are common. Only seven cases of Pott's puffy tumor in adults have been reported, and only one of these cases was caused by H. influenzae. Surgical drainage and antibiotic therapy remain standard therapy for this condition.

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cefprozil; Ceftriaxone; Cephalosporins; Follow-Up Studies; Frontal Bone; Haemophilus Infections; Haemophilus influenzae; Humans; Male; Osteomyelitis; Radiography; Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed

1996

Trials

1 trial(s) available for cefzil and Haemophilus-Infections

ArticleYear
Comparative efficacy and safety of cefprozil and amoxycillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute otitis media in children.
    The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 1994, Volume: 33, Issue:6

    Cefprozil is a new oral cephalosporin with activity against the most common pathogens isolated in acute otitis media. This randomized study enrolled 361 patients (mean age 29 months). Physical examination and culture via tympanocentesis were required less than 48 h before therapy. One hundred and ninety-one patients were evaluable for clinical efficacy; 99 received cefprozil (20 mg/kg/day bd) and 92 received amoxycillin/clavulanate (13.3 mg/kg/day tid). Duration of treatment was 7-9 days for 81 patients, 10 days for 105 patients and 11-16 days for five patients. The treatment groups were comparable with respect to demographics, severity of infection and number of previous episodes. Clinical evaluations of efficacy were based on physical examination including otoscopy within a 14 day period after therapy. Satisfactory clinical responses were achieved in 84% of cefprozil-treated patients and 87% of amoxycillin/clavulanate-treated patients. Pathogens most commonly isolated included Haemophilus influenzae (33%) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (22%). All 361 patients were evaluable for safety. Adverse clinical events were reported in 13% (24) of cefprozil-treated patients and 20% (36) of amoxycillin/clavulanate-treated patients. Cefprozil, administered twice a day, is comparable to a regimen of amoxycillin/clavulanate three times a day in the treatment of acute otitis media in children.

    Topics: Acute Disease; Amoxicillin; Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination; Cefprozil; Cephalosporins; Child, Preschool; Clavulanic Acids; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Haemophilus Infections; Haemophilus influenzae; Humans; Infant; Male; Moraxella catarrhalis; Neisseriaceae Infections; Otitis Media; Pneumococcal Infections; Streptococcus pneumoniae

1994

Other Studies

2 other study(ies) available for cefzil and Haemophilus-Infections

ArticleYear
Pharmacodynamics of cefprozil against Haemophilus influenzae in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model.
    Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 2006, Volume: 56, Issue:4

    An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was used to determine the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) measure and magnitude most strongly related to cefprozil activity against Haemophilus influenzae. Using 3 clinical isolates of H. influenzae, a series of dose-fractionation studies were conducted, simulating cefprozil pediatric pharmacokinetics. The studies were designed to deliver a range of free cefprozil AUC(24) given once daily, twice daily, and by continuous infusion (CI). Drug effect, characterized by computing the log(10) ratio of the area under the 24-h bacterial colony-forming unit (CFU) (AUC(CFU)) curve to drug-free control, was fit to a Hill-type model for 3 PK-PD measures of activity: AUC(24)/MIC, C(max)/MIC, and %T > MIC. Once daily regimens provided much less activity than twice daily or CI regimens. AUC(24)/MIC and %T > MIC characterized the data well, whereas C(max)/MIC did not. Based on the PK-PD model results, for cefprozil twice daily, 50% and 80% of maximum drug effect (E(max)) was achieved at a %T > MIC of approximately 52% and 75%, respectively. A 2-log(10) reduction in log(10) ratio would require free drug %T > MIC of 58% or AUC(24)/MIC of 86. Bacteriostasis was achieved at a %T > MIC and an AUC(24)/MIC of approximately 25% and 30%, respectively. An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was able to characterize the PK-PD of cefprozil against H. influenzae. Consistent with limited clinical data, a minimum %T > MIC of 40% to 50% would be suggested to achieve in vivo activity in otitis media, with maximal activity at approximately 70%T > MIC.

    Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefprozil; Cephalosporins; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Haemophilus Infections; Haemophilus influenzae; Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests

2006
Revised disk diffusion interpretive criteria for cefaclor, loracarbef, cefprozil and cefixime when testing Haemophilus influenzae on haemophilus test medium.
    European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 1994, Volume: 13, Issue:6

    The aim of the current five-center collaborative study was to reassess the interpretive criteria for cefaclor, loracarbef, cefprozil and cefixime previously adopted or proposed by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) for disk diffusion susceptibility tests with Haemophilus influenzae on Haemophilus Test Medium (HTM) agar. MICs and zones of inhibition were determined using NCCLS methods, HTM and two collections of strains of Haemophilus influenzae. One group of strains consisted of 118 stock organisms taken largely from various recent U.S. antibiotic resistance surveillance studies. The emphasis in this selected group of organisms was on strains that were beta-lactamase negative but ampicillin resistant (BLNAR) by some other mechanism. The second collection of test organisms consisted of 50 recent clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae obtained from each of the five participating study centers. This group was considered representative of the type of Haemophilus influenzae currently recovered from clinical sources in the USA. Frequency distribution assessment and error-rate bounded analysis of scattergram comparisons of MICs and zone sizes were used to develop the following zone diameters interpretive for disk diffusion susceptibility tests with Haemophilus influenzae on HTM agar: cefaclor, > or = 20 mm (susceptible, S) and < or = 16 mm (resistant, R); loracarbef, > or = 19 mm (S) and < or = 15 mm (R); and cefprozil, > 18 mm (S) and < 14 mm (R). The respective MIC correlates for all three antimicrobial agents were < or = 8 micrograms/ml (S) and 32 micrograms/ml (R).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

    Topics: Cefaclor; Cefixime; Cefotaxime; Cefprozil; Cephalosporins; Culture Media; Haemophilus Infections; Haemophilus influenzae; Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Quality Control

1994