cefuroxime-axetil and Maxillary-Sinusitis

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of a 5-day course of telithromycin (800 mg once daily) with a 10-day course of telithromycin or standard comparators (amoxicillin-clavulanate 500/125 mg three times daily or cefuroxime axetil 250 mg twice daily) in patients with acute maxillary sinusitis (AMS).. Data from three randomised double blind studies were pooled. The studies included patients with clinical symptoms of AMS and sinus X-ray findings of total opacity, air-fluid levels or mucosal thickening.. Pooled analysis of results for 5-day telithromycin revealed overall clinical cure rates of 83.6% (383/458 patients) at post-therapy (days 17-24) and 78.9% (330/418 patients) at late post-therapy (days 31-45) in the per-protocol population. Clinical cure rates at post-therapy were equivalent to those observed with 10-day telithromycin (82.5% vs 81.7%) or comparator treatment (80.9% vs 77.4%). Moreover, clinical cure rates exceeded 80% in subgroups of patients of interest, including those with severe infection and those fulfilling more stringent criteria for bacterial AMS. A satisfactory bacteriological outcome was achieved in 87.6% of patients. The 5-day telithromycin regimen was well tolerated.. Telithromycin once daily for 5 days offers effective treatment for AMS and is comparable to 10-day courses of standard treatments.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefuroxime; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Female; Humans; Ketolides; Male; Maxillary Sinusitis; Middle Aged

Telithromycin, the first approved ketolide antibiotic, was developed to treat community-acquired respiratory tract infections, including acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis (ABMS). A previously published study showed that a 5-day course of 800 mg telithromycin once daily is as effective as a 10-day course in the treatment of ABMS.. Data were pooled from two controlled, multinational, prospective, randomized, double-blinded ABMS trials comparing 5-day telithromycin (800 mg once daily) with 10-day amoxicillin-clavulanate (500/125 mg 3 times daily) and cefuroxime axetil (250 mg twice daily). Clinical cure and bacteriologic eradication rates were compared by means of descriptive statistics.. The clinical cure rate for telithromycin was 80.9% versus 77.4% for comparators; bacteriologic eradication rate for telithromycin was 84.9% versus 81.7% for comparators. Most adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity and, most commonly, gastrointestinal in nature.. These results support the conclusion that 5 days of treatment with telithromycin is as safe and effective in patients with ABMS as a 10-day course of treatment with amoxicillin-clavulanate or cefuroxime axetil.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefuroxime; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Haemophilus influenzae; Humans; Ketolides; Male; Maxillary Sinusitis; Middle Aged; Moraxella catarrhalis; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Staphylococcus aureus; Streptococcus pneumoniae

In this multicentre, multinational, comparative, double-blind clinical trial, outpatients with both clinical signs and symptoms and radiographic evidence of acute sinusitis were randomly assigned to receive for 7 days either a twice-daily oral regimen of faropenem daloxate (300 mg) or a twice daily oral regimen of cefuroxime axetil (250 mg). Among 452 patients considered valid for clinical efficacy, faropenem daloxate treatment was found to be statistically equivalent to cefuroxime axetil (89.0% vs. 88.4%-95% CI=-5.2%; +6.4%) at the 7-16 days post-therapy assessment. At 28-35 days post-therapy, the continued clinical cure rate in the faropenem daloxate group was 92.6% and that for the cefuroxime axetil group was 94.9% (95% CI: -6.8%; +1.2%). A total of 148 organisms was obtained in 136 microbiologically valid patients (30.1%). The predominant causative organisms were Streptococcus pneumoniae (47.1%), Haemophilus influenzae (30.1%), Staphylococcus aureus (14.7%) and Moraxella catarrhalis (8.8%). The bacteriological success rate at the 7-16 days post-therapy evaluation was similar in both treatment groups: 91.5% and 90.8% in the faropenem daloxate and cefuroxime axetil groups, respectively (95% CI=-9.2%; +9.5%). Eradication or presumed eradication was detected for 97.3% and 96.3% of S. pneumoniae, 85.0% and 90.5% of H. influenzae, 88.9% and 90.9% of S. aureus and 100.0% and 83.3% of M. catarrhalis in faropenem daloxate and cefuroxime axetil recipients, respectively. At least one drug-related event was reported by 9.5% of the faropenem daloxate-treated patients and by 10.3% of those who received cefuroxime axetil. The most frequently reported drug-related events were diarrhoea (2.2% versus 2.9%), nausea/vomiting (1.5% vs. 0.7%), abdominal pain (0.7% vs 1.5%) and skin reactions (1.5% vs. 1.1%). Overall, faropenem daloxate was at least as effective clinically and bacteriologically as cefuroxime axetil and was well tolerated.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Infections; beta-Lactams; Cefuroxime; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Lactams; Male; Maxillary Sinusitis; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin to cefuroxime axetil for the management of acute bacterial sinusitis or acute exacerbations of chronic sinusitis.. In this prospective, multicentre, randomized, double-blind clinical trial, 501 adult outpatients seen in 17 otolaryngology offices with both symptoms and radiographic evidence of acute maxillary sinusitis randomly received oral ciprofloxacin (500 mg b.i.d.) or cefuroxime axetil (250 mg b.i.d.), each for 10 days. Patients were further subclassified as having either acute sinusitis or an acute exacerbation of chronic sinusitis. All patients underwent maxillary sinus aspiration at study entry to establish a microbiologic etiology. The primary measure of efficacy was the rate of clinical success in the efficacy-valid population at the end of therapy. Secondary measures included bacteriologic response at the end of therapy, and 2- to 4-week clinical and bacteriologic follow-up response rates in both efficacy-valid and intent-to-treat groups.. Haemophilus influenzae (21%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (19%), Moraxella catarrhalis (14%), and Staphylococcus aureus (9%) were the most commonly isolated pathogens (target organisms) among the 225 causative organisms identified from 189 patients. Of 453 adults valid for clinical efficacy (228 ciprofloxacin, 225 cefuroxime axetil), ciprofloxacin treatment was statistically equivalent to cefuroxime axetil at the end of treatment (87% vs. 83%; CI95 = -0.021 ... 0.106) and at follow-up (91% vs. 88%; CI95 = -0.044 ... 0.080). The clinical response was similar for subgroups of patients with positive cultures, including the subset with target organisms. Bacteriologic eradication at end of therapy was similar between the two groups (97% ciprofloxacin, 95% cefuroxime axetil). Both treatments were equally well tolerated.. Ciprofloxacin is as effective as cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of community-acquired acute sinusitis.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Cefuroxime; Cephalosporins; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Haemophilus Infections; Humans; Male; Maxillary Sinusitis; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index; Staphylococcal Infections; Streptococcal Infections

This double-masked, multicenter, randomized clinical trial compared the efficacy and tolerability of cefuroxime axetil and amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis. A total of 263 patients with acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis were randomly assigned to receive 10 days of treatment with either cefuroxime axetil 250 mg twice daily (n = 132) or amoxicillin/clavulanate 500/125 mg 3 times daily (n = 131). Patients' responses to treatment were assessed once during treatment (6 to 8 days after the start of treatment), at the end of treatment (1 to 3 days posttreatment), and at follow-up (26 to 30 days after cessation of treatment). Clinical success, defined as cure or improvement, was equivalent in the cefuroxime axetil and amoxicillin/ clavulanate groups at the end-of-treatment and follow-up assessments. Patients in both groups showed improvements in symptoms of acute sinusitis at the during-treatment visit. Treatment with amoxicillin/clavulanate was associated with a significantly higher incidence of drug-related adverse events than treatment with cefuroxime axetil (29% vs 17%), primarily reflecting a higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events (23% vs 11%), particularly diarrhea. Two patients in the cefuroxime axetil group and 8 patients in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group withdrew from the study due to adverse events (P = 0.06). These results indicate that cefuroxime axetil 250 mg twice daily is as effective as amoxicillin/clavulanate 500 mg 3 times daily in the treatment of acute sinusitis and produces fewer gastrointestinal adverse events. cefuroxime axetil, amoxicillin/clavulanate, acute sinusitis.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination; Cefuroxime; Cephalosporins; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Maxillary Sinusitis; Middle Aged; Patient Dropouts

The aim of this prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-masked clinical trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin with those of cefuroxime axetil for the treatment of community-acquired acute sinusitis. Five hundred forty-two adult patients with symptoms and radiographic evidence of acute maxillary sinusitis received a 10-day oral regimen of either moxifloxacin (400 mg once daily) or cefuroxime axetil (250 mg twice daily). Acute signs and symptoms at presentation had lasted >7 days but <4 weeks. Clinical response at the end of therapy (7 to 14 days after treatment) was the primary efficacy variable. Four hundred fifty-seven of the patients (223 moxifloxacin, 234 cefuroxime axetil) were included in the clinical efficacy analysis. Moxifloxacin was found to be similar in effectiveness to cefuroxime axetil at the end-of-therapy visit (90% vs. 89%, respectively; 95% confidence interval, -5.1% to 6.2%). Clinical relapse at the follow-up visit was reported for only 8 patients (3 moxifloxacin, 5 cefuroxime axetil). No clinically significant differences were observed with respect to the number of patients experiencing a successful clinical response based on demographic or infection characteristics. Five of the 542 enrolled patients were lost to follow-up. Of the 537 patients in the intent-to-treat population, drug-related adverse events were reported in 37% of moxifloxacin-treated patients and in 26% of cefuroxime axetil-treated patients (P = 0.006). Adverse-event profiles were comparable in the 2 treatment groups, with the exception of nausea, which was reported by 11% of moxifloxacin-treated patients compared with 4% of cef uroxime axetil-treated patients (P = 0.003). In this study, moxifloxacin was as effective as cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of community-acquired acute sinusitis.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Infective Agents; Aza Compounds; Cefuroxime; Cephalosporins; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Humans; Male; Maxillary Sinusitis; Middle Aged; Moxifloxacin; Prospective Studies; Quinolines

Acute maxillary sinusitis is a common condition requiring broad-spectrum therapy to prevent development of chronic disease. A randomised, double-blind, multicentre study was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of cefuroxime axetil 250 mg twice daily (n = 185) and clarithromycin 250 mg twice daily (n = 185), both administered for 10 days, in the treatment of patients with acute sinusitis. Efficacy was determined by assessment of clinical response at post-treatment and follow-up, and by radiological assessment at pre-treatment and follow-up. Assessment of days absent from work due to illness was also made. In the cefuroxime axetil group, 169/185 (91%) patients were cured/improved at post-treatment, as were 172/185 (93%) patients receiving clarithromycin and, of these, 137/169 (81%) and 143/172 (83%) maintained their response at follow-up. Follow-up radiography showed a reduction in incidence of air fluid level and/or opacification from 96% to 15% (cefuroxime axetil) and from 96% to 11% (clarithromycin), and a decrease in frequency of mucosal thickening from 58% to 28% (cefuroxime axetil) and from 56% to 29% (clarithromycin). Only 10% of patients in either group experienced adverse events and days absent from work were comparable. This study demonstrated clinical equivalence between twice-daily cefuroxime axetil and clarithromycin, both treatments being effective and well tolerated.

Topics: Absenteeism; Acute Disease; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefuroxime; Cephalosporins; Chi-Square Distribution; Clarithromycin; Confidence Intervals; Female; Humans; Male; Maxillary Sinusitis

This multicenter study compared the clinical and bacteriologic efficacy of two oral antibiotics, cefuroxime axetil and amoxicillin/clavulanate, in the treatment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis.. Three hundred seventeen patients with clinical and radiographic evidence of acute maxillary sinusitis were enrolled at nine centers and were randomly assigned to receive 10 days of treatment with cefuroxime axetil 250 mg twice daily (n = 157) or amoxicillin/clavulanate 500 mg three times daily (n = 160). Patients were assessed for both clinical and bacteriologic responses once during treatment (5 to 7 days) and twice after treatment (1 to 3 days and 4 weeks). Bacteriologic assessments were based on needle aspirates of the maxillary sinus obtained pretreatment and, when possible, at the first posttreatment visit.. Organisms were isolated from the pretreatment sinus aspirates of 198 of 317 (62%) patients, with the primary isolates being Streptococcus pneumoniae (22%), Haemophilus spp. (17%), Staphylococcus aureus (13%), and Haemophilus influenzae (10%). A satisfactory clinical outcome (cure or improvement) was achieved in 85% (98 of 115) and 82% (102 of 124) of the clinically evaluable patients treated with cefuroxime axetil or amoxicillin/clavulanate, respectively (P = 0.446). With respect to the eradication of the bacterial pathogens, a satisfactory outcome (cure or presumed cure) was obtained in 84% (31 of 37) and 87% (34 of 39) of bacteriologically evaluable patients treated with cefuroxime axetil or amoxicillin/clavulanate, respectively (p = 0.567). Treatment with amoxicillin/clavulanate was associated with a significantly higher incidence of drug-related adverse events (13% versus 3%, p = 0.001), particularly diarrhea (8% versus 1%, p = 0.001). Two patients in the cefuroxime axetil group and three patients in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group withdrew from the study due to adverse events.. Our results indicate that cefuroxime axetil twice a day is as effective as amoxicillin/clavulanate three times a day in the treatment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis but produces fewer adverse effects.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Amoxicillin; Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination; Cefuroxime; Clavulanic Acids; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Maxillary Sinusitis; Prodrugs; Single-Blind Method; Treatment Outcome

The drug sensitiveness to beta-lactam antibiotics of the bacterial flora, taken by sinus puncture from 115 patients with unior bilateral acute exacerbation of chronic maxillary sinusitis was analysed. About 90% of the isolated pathogens, as well as in subgroup treated with amoxicillin with potassium clavulanate and in subgroup treated with cefuroxime axetil showed antibiotic sensitivity. Among isolated pathogens before the treatment, 4 (9.5%) were resistant to the amoxicillin with potassium clavulanate disks in subgroup A and 3 (7.3%) to the cefuroxime axetil in subgroup B. There was only one pathogen isolated in the control evaluation in both group after the treatment.

Topics: Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefuroxime; Chronic Disease; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Maxillary Sinusitis

Adults with a common cold often have paranasal sinus effusions detected by computed tomographic (CT) scans. There are no comparable data for children. The purpose of this study was to document the sinus CT findings in children with short-duration purulent rhinorrhea.. Thirty children, 3 to 12 years of age (median age, 7 years), with purulent rhinorrhea for a mean duration of 5 days (and always less than 9 days) were enrolled in the study. The children were otherwise well. Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approval was obtained before enrollment of the first patient. Informed written consent was obtained from each child's parent. CT imaging of the maxillary and ethmoid sinuses was obtained on the day of the initial visit (occasionally, the following day). Follow-up CT scans were obtained from cooperative children/parents, 3 to 4 weeks later.. Opacification or an air/fluid level in the maxillary sinuses was seen in 27 (90%) of 30 study children at study entry. Ethmoid sinuses were not opacified without opacification of a maxillary sinus. Three weeks later, 24 of 27 study children, who had positive CT scans on study entry, improved clinically. Of 17 follow-up CT scans, 10 (58%) normalized, 4 had improvement of bilateral disease, and 3 improved with unilateral disease. None appeared worse than baseline.. Pansinus opacification (ethmoid and maxillary sinuses), on CT scans in children with short-duration purulent nasal drainage was seen in 70% of children. An additional 20% had isolated maxillary sinus effusions (10% had no effusion). Three-week follow-up CT scans on 17 children were normal in 60% and improved (partial clearance) in 40%. In this patient population, the decision to treat with antibiotics should be made on clinical grounds alone.

Topics: Cefuroxime; Cephalosporins; Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea; Child; Child, Preschool; Ethmoid Sinusitis; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Maxillary Sinusitis; Suppuration; Time Factors; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Cefuroxime axetil, a new beta-lactamase-stable cephalosporin, was compared with cefaclor for the treatment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis in 106 adult patients. Direct sinus aspirations for quantitative bacterial culture were done for all patients before treatment; aspiration was repeated for most patients after treatment. Pretreatment sinus aspirates were positive for 63 of 134 sampled sinuses. Of specimens yielding at least 10(4) CFU/mL, Haemophilus influenzae (38%) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (37%) were the most common pathogens. Ten (42%) of 24 strains of H influenzae, 2 (40%) of 5 Haemophilus parainfluenzae, and all 3 isolates (60%) of Branhamella catarrhalis produced beta-lactamase. Cefuroxime axetil, 250 mg twice a day, was compared with cefaclor, 500 mg three times a day. Among culture-positive sinuses, bacteriologic cure was achieved in 36 (95%) of 38 sinuses and 15 (71%) of 21 sinuses treated with cefuroxime axetil and cefaclor, respectively. The overall frequencies of adverse events were similar between drugs, although cefuroxime axetil was associated with more frequent diarrhea. Cefuroxime axetil was an effective therapy for the treatment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis in adults.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Bacterial Infections; beta-Lactamases; Cefaclor; Cefuroxime; Cephalexin; Cephalosporins; Drug Evaluation; Female; Haemophilus influenzae; Humans; Male; Maxillary Sinusitis; Middle Aged; Moraxella catarrhalis; Prodrugs; Streptococcus pneumoniae