cefuroxime-axetil and Bronchitis--Chronic

A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial was performed comparing 200 mg of cefditoren-pivoxil twice daily for 5 days versus standard cefuroxime-axetil treatment (250 mg twice daily for 10 days) of Anthonisen type I or II acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. The modified intention-to-treat population included 541 patients. Patients were assessed during therapy, at the end of therapy (visit 3; primary evaluation time point), and at follow-up. Clinical success was obtained in 79.9% of the 264 patients included in the cefditoren-pivoxil group and in 82.7% of the 277 patients in the cefuroxime-axetil group (treatment difference, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.8, -9.7 to 3.6%). Treatment clinical effects were more clearly seen in sputum signs (decreasing volume and purulence from approximately 80% to approximately 10% of the patients). At the end of treatment, exploratory analysis of the per-pathogen bacteriological response showed 72.8% (of 103 isolates) in the cefditoren-pivoxil arm versus 67.0% (of 94 isolates) in the cefuroxime-axetil group (treatment difference; 95% CI: 5.8, -7.0 to 18.6%). Globally, the per-pathogen bacteriological response correlated well with clinical success: 83.5% of 164 baseline isolates from patients with a clinical success were eradicated or presumably eradicated, in contrast to only 3% of 33 isolates from patients with a clinical failure. Clinical success in patients infected with Haemophilus influenzae, the most frequent isolate, was 84% (of 50) and 82.5% (of 40) (treatment difference; 95% CI: 1.5, -14 to 17%) in the cefditoren-pivoxil versus the cefuroxime-axetil group. Although this study does not prove that either drug is better than a placebo, cefditoren-pivoxil and the standard 10-day cefuroxime-axetil course had similar point estimates of success in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bronchitis, Chronic; Cefuroxime; Cephalosporins; Confidence Intervals; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Haemophilus influenzae; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Sputum; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To compare the effectiveness of oral moxifloxacin with standard antibiotic therapy in acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB).. Multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind study of two parallel treatment arms.. Outpatients >or= 45 years old with stable chronic bronchitis, smoking history of >or= 20 pack-years, two or more AECBs in the previous year, and FEV(1) < 85% of predicted value. Patients were enrolled when in a stable condition, and patients with exacerbations within 12 months of enrollment were randomized.. Randomization (stratified on steroid use) between moxifloxacin (400 mg qd for 5 days) and standard therapy (amoxicillin [500 mg tid for 7 days], clarithromycin [500 mg bid for 7 days], or cefuroxime-axetil [250 mg bid for 7 days]).. Assessment at enrollment, randomization (Anthonisen type 1 exacerbation), 7 to 10 days after treatment, and monthly until next AECB or up to 9 months. The primary efficacy variable was clinical success (sufficient improvement, no alternative antimicrobial therapy required) 7 to 10 days after therapy. Secondary predefined end points were clinical cure (return to pre-exacerbation status), further antimicrobial use, time to next AECB, and bacteriologic success.. Three hundred fifty-four patients received moxifloxacin, and 376 patients received standard therapy. At 7 to 10 days after therapy, clinical success rates were similar in intention-to-treat (ITT) patients (95% confidence interval [CI], - 0.7 to 9.5) and per-protocol (PP) patients (95% CI, - 3.0 to 8.5). Moxifloxacin showed superior clinical cure rates over standard therapy in both ITT patients (95% CI, 1.4 to 14.9) and PP patients (95% CI, 0.3 to 15.6), and higher bacteriologic success in microbiologically valid patients (95% CI, 0.4 to 22.1). Fewer ITT patients required antimicrobials after treatment with moxifloxacin than standard therapy (p < 0.01). Time to next exacerbation was longer with moxifloxacin; median and mean times to new AECBs in ITT patients who did not require any further antibiotics were 131.0 days and 132.8 days in moxifloxacin, and 103.5 days and 118.0 days in standard therapy, respectively (p = 0.03). The occurrence of failure, new exacerbation, or any further antibiotic was less frequent in moxifloxacin-treated patients for up to 5 months of follow-up (p = 0.03).. Moxifloxacin was equivalent to standard therapy for clinical success and showed superiority over standard therapy in clinical cure, bacteriologic eradication, and long-term outcomes.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Amoxicillin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Aza Compounds; Bronchitis, Chronic; Cefuroxime; Clarithromycin; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Moxifloxacin; Quinolines

In a randomized, open-label, controlled, multicentre study, the clinical and bacteriological efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral gemifloxacin (320 mg once daily, 5 days) was compared with sequential intravenous (i.v.) ceftriaxone (1 g once daily, maximum 3 days) followed by oral cefuroxime axetil (500 mg twice daily, maximum 7 days) in adult hospitalized patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) (n = 274). The clinical success rates at follow-up (21-28 days post-therapy) in the clinical per-protocol population (the primary endpoint) were 86.8% (105/121) for gemifloxacin vs. 81.3% (91/112) for ceftriaxone/cefuroxime (treatment difference = 5.5,95% CI -3.9,14.9). The corresponding clinical results in the clinical intention-to-treat (ITT) population were 82.6% (114/138) vs. 72.1% (98/136), respectively (treatment difference = 10.5,95% CI 0.7, 20.4).Thus, gemifloxacin had significantly higher clinical success rates than ceftriaxone/cefuroxime. The median time to discharge was 9 days in the gemifloxacin group vs. 11 days in the ceftriaxone/cefuroxime group (P = 0.04, Wilcoxon test). At follow-up, 120/138 (87.0%) gemifloxacin-treated patients had been discharged from hospital, compared with 111/136 (81.6%) ceftriaxone/cefuroxime-treated patients in the clinical ITT population. Both treatments were generally well tolerated and there was no significant difference between the treatment groups in the incidence or type of adverse events reported. A 5-day course of oral gemifloxacin was shown by this study to be at least equivalent to sequential i.v. ceftriaxone/cefuroxime axetil (for up to 10 days) in patients with AECB who require hospital treatment.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Bacterial Infections; Bronchitis, Chronic; Ceftriaxone; Cefuroxime; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Forced Expiratory Volume; Gemifloxacin; Hospitalization; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Naphthyridines; Treatment Outcome

In the absence of a confirmed pathogen, empiric antimicrobial treatment of patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (ABECB) is accepted as standard practice and recommended in treatment guidelines.. This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of a 10-day course of 3 antimicrobial regimens commonly used to treat adults with ABECB.. This prospective, open-label, randomized study assessed clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily, levofloxacin 500 mg once daily, and cefuroxime axetil 250 mg twice daily, each administered for 10 days with food, in patients with ABECB. Efficacy was determined on the basis of the clinical response to treatment and need for hospitalization and/or further antimicrobial therapy.. A total of 283 patients (150 men, 133 women) with a mean age of 55 years (range, 29 to 86 years) were randomized to receive clarithromycin (n = 97), levofloxacin (n = 94), or cefuroxime axetil (n = 92). Of 262 clinically assessable patients, clinical cure or improvement occurred in 87.9% (80/91) of those treated with clarithromycin, 87.4% (76/87) of those treated with levofloxacin, and 79.8% (67/84) of those treated with cefuroxime axetil. Eight (8.8%) clarithromycin-treated patients, 6 (6.9%) levofloxacin-treated patients, and 12 (14.3%) cefuroxime axetil-treated patients required a change in antimicrobial therapy to achieve clinical cure/improvement; between-group differences were not significant. No patients treated with clarithromycin required hospitalization for further antimicrobial treatment, compared with 3.4% (3/87) of levofloxacin-treated and 3.6% (3/84) of cefuroxime axetil-treated patients (P = NS). A total of 6.2% (6/97) of clarithromycin-treated patients were prematurely discontinued from treatment due to adverse events, compared with 7.4% (7/94) and 8.7% (8/92) of levofloxacin- and cefuroxime axetil-treated patients, respectively.. A high rate of clinical efficacy and tolerability was observed in this population of patients with ABECB treated with clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily, levofloxacin 500 mg once daily, or cefuroxime axetil 250 mg twice daily for 10 days.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Infections; Bronchitis, Chronic; Cefuroxime; Clarithromycin; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Levofloxacin; Male; Middle Aged; Ofloxacin; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) are the most common complication of chronic bronchitis. The majority of AECB are caused by infection. The choice of appropriate antibacterial therapy for AECB is becoming more difficult and is usually empirically. Cefaclor and cefuroxime are used for ambulatory treatment of AECB.. This multicenter, randomized, single blind study was undertaken in order to compare efficacy and safety of cefaclor AF (500 mg BID) and cefuroxime axetil (250 mg BID) in 10 days treatment of ambulatory patients with AECB. 170 adults were enrolled into the study. Clinical responses were assessed on 17th-24th day after randomization.. Both antibiotics had high over 97% effectiveness in the treatment of AECB. There was statistically significant 1.7 times higher rate of patients with cough release after cefaclor treatment compared to cefuroxime (p<0.03). There was a significantly 2.25 higher rate of patients with AECB symptoms release like: increasing dyspnea, sputum volume and sputum purulence or cough in cefaclor group compared to cefuroxime (p<0.0187). Both treatments resulted in significant improvement of pulmonary peak expiratory flow (PEF). There were no differences between the rates of gastrointestinal and other side effects in both groups.. 1. Cefaclor and cefuroxime have similar high efficacy and safety in 10 days treatment of patients with AECB. 2. Cefaclor treatment significantly higher 2.25 times reduces the rate of principle symptoms of AECB compared to cefuroxime. 3. Both antibiotics treatment significantly increase PEF, with higher tendency observed in after cefaclor treatment.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bronchitis, Chronic; Cefaclor; Cefuroxime; Cephalosporins; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Single-Blind Method; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

A pharmacoeconomic analysis was done to compare the efficiency of two treatments in the acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis: telithromycin and cefuroxime-axetil.. Restrospective analysis, modeled through a decision tree. The effectiveness of the treatments was estimated through a randomized and double-blind clinical trial in which 800 mg/day (5 days) of telithromycin were compared with 1,000 mg/day (10 days) of cefuroxime-axetil in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (140 and 142 patients, respectively). Resources use was estimated from clinical trial and from Spanish data, and the unit costs through a health costs dabatase. The model was validated by a panel of Spanish clinical experts.. Since the clinical trial was designed to demonstrate equivalence, there were no significant differences of effectiveness among both treatments (with a rate of clinical cure of 86.4% and 83.1%, respectively) which means that an analysis of costs minimization was done. In the average case, the average cost of the disease by patient was 174.83 Euros with telithromycin and 194.68 Euros with cefuroxime-axetil (a difference of 19.85 Euros). The results were maintained in the analysis of sensitivity, with favorable differences for telithromycin that ranged between 18.04 Euros and 22.25 Euros.. With telithromycin up to 22 Euros by patient with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis could be saved, in comparison with cefuroxime-axetil.

Topics: Acute Disease; Algorithms; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bronchitis, Chronic; Cefuroxime; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Ketolides

Recent studies of the role of bacteria in chronic bronchitis have shown that bacterial colonisation is associated with enhanced inflammation and that purulent acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) are associated with bacteria and characterised by increased inflammation. Changes in bronchial inflammation in response to the success or failure of bacterial eradication following AECB were therefore studied.. Bacterial quantitative culture and sputum markers of inflammation (myeloperoxidase (MPO), neutrophil elastase, leukotriene B4 (LTB4), sol:serum albumin ratio, and secretory leukoprotease inhibitor) were measured in patients presenting with culture positive purulent AECB and repeated 10 days and 2 months later. 41 patients provided sputum sufficient for both bacteriology and assessment of inflammation at baseline and day 10, and 46 provided sufficient sample for bacteriology, 40 of which could also be analysed for inflammation at 2 months (when clinically stable).. At day 10, 17 of the 41 patient samples had a positive bacterial culture. In the stable state, 18 of the 46 samples had a positive culture, but with a significantly lower bacterial load than at presentation. Although there was no difference between the groups at presentation, the concentration of MPO was lower (p<0.05) in those in whom bacteria were eradicated by day 10 than in those with persisting bacteria. The LTB4 concentration was similarly lower (p<0.001) in those in whom bacteria were eradicated than in those with persistent bacteria. In the stable clinical state the concentrations of both MPO and LTB4 were lower in those in whom bacteria were eradicated than in patients with persisting bacteria.. Resolution of bronchial inflammation following AECB is related to bacterial eradication. Those in whom bacteria continue to be cultured in their sputum have partial resolution of inflammation which may reflect continued stimulation by the reduced bacterial load.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Infections; Biomarkers; Bronchitis, Chronic; Cefuroxime; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Sputum