ceftobiprole and Pneumonia--Bacterial

Ceftobiprole is a fifth-generation cephalosporin with potent antimicrobial activity against Gram positive and Gram-negative bacteria. It has been approved in major European countries for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), excluding ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Ceftobiprole is currently in a phase 3 clinical program for registration in the U.S. In 2015, it was designated as an infectious disease product qualified for the treatment of lung and skin infections by the FDA. The efficacy of ceftobiprole in pneumonia has been demonstrated in two-phase III clinical trials conducted in patients with CAP and HAP. The recommended dose in the adult with pneumonia is 500 mg every 8 h infused in 2 h; in case of renal failure, the regimen of administration must be adjusted according to the patient's renal function. It is not necessary to adjust the dose according to gender, age, body weight or liver failure. In case of hyperfiltration, an extension to 4 h infusion of the 500mg TID is required.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Clinical Trials as Topic; Community-Acquired Infections; Critical Illness; Cross Infection; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Renal Insufficiency

Ceftobiprole is a fifth-generation cephalosporin approved for the treatment of adult community-acquired pneumonia and non-ventilator associated hospital-acquired pneumonia. However, its microbiological and pharmacokinetic profile is very attractive as armamentarium for empirical monotherapy treatment in other infections too. Among these, the following scenarios could be considered complicated skin and soft tissue infections, moderate-severe diabetic foot infections without bone involvement, vascular-catheter-associated-bloodstream infections, and fever without apparent focus in the hospitalized patient without septic shock or profound immunosuppression.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Infections; Catheter-Related Infections; Cephalosporins; Cross Infection; Diabetic Foot; Fever of Unknown Origin; Humans; Inpatients; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Skin Diseases, Bacterial; Soft Tissue Infections

Ceftobiprole is a fifth generation cephalosporin with a series of characteristics differentiating it from other beta-lactams, including its antibacterial activity, mainly against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and also Gram-negative microorganisms such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This antibiotic has been subjected to various clinical trials and the results of these have led to its approval in Spain for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia, excluding that associated with mechanical ventilation, and community-acquired pneumonia. The results of various ceftobiprole clinical studies provide consistent information on efficacy and tolerability. Ceftobiprole as monotherapy has been shown to be non-inferior to comparator antibiotics in different settings. Information is available on its compatibility with other drugs in Y-site administration, important from the point of view of the intravenous treatment of patients who present venous access limitation. On the other hand, and in contrast to other cephalosporins, ceftobiprole presents a low risk of infection due to Clostridium difficile and, in comparison with ceftaroline, neutropenia has not been reported to present any significant issues.

Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Community-Acquired Infections; Cross Infection; Humans; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Neutropenia; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Streptococcus pneumoniae

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), while decreasing in overall incidence, is still a prominent concern world-wide. New agents coming to market in the last 10 years allow practitioners to optimize treatment for MRSA infections. Ceftobiprole is a cephalosporin agent with MRSA activity, currently approved in selected countries for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and hospital-acquired pneumonia. Areas covered: Relevant literature regarding spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical trials will be discussed. Expert opinion: Ceftobiprole is an addition to a growing number of antimicrobials with activity against MRSA. Concern for appropriate dosing in critically ill patients remains due to its ineffectiveness for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). While ceftobiprole has activity against gram-negative organisms, the allowance for use of an additional agent for gram-negative infections in clinical trials limits recommendations for monotherapy for empirical treatment of HAP. Ceftobiprole's place in therapy will lie in its activity against gram positive organisms, such as Streptococcus spp. and Staphylococcus spp.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Community-Acquired Infections; Critical Illness; Cross Infection; Humans; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated; Staphylococcal Infections

Ceftobiprole, a new broad spectrum, parenteral cephalosporin, exhibits potent in vitro activity against a number of Gram-positive pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Gram-negative pathogens associated with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Ceftobiprole has demonstrated noninferiority in two large-scale pivotal studies comparing it to ceftriaxone with or without linezolid in CAP, with clinical cure rates 86.6% versus 87.4%, or ceftazidime in HAP, with clinical cure rates of 77% versus 76%, respectively. However, ceftobiprole was inferior in the subgroup of patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. Ceftobiprole has so far demonstrated a good safety profile in preliminary studies, with similar tolerability to comparators. The most commonly observed adverse events of ceftobiprole included headache and gastrointestinal upset. It is the first cephalosporin monotherapy approved in the EU for the treatment of both CAP and HAP (excluding ventilator-associated pneumonia).

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Community-Acquired Infections; Cross Infection; Europe; Humans; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Treatment Outcome

Pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis (CF) are frequent events and account for a substantial proportion of the burden of morbidity and mortality in this disease. Antibacterial therapies to treat pulmonary exacerbations are instituted empirically and are individualized based on both patient factors (severity of exacerbation, frequency of exacerbation, recent courses of anti-infectives) and pathogen factors (previously isolated pathogens and in vitro predicted susceptibilities). However, the epidemiology of pathogens infecting CF airways is changing, with increased incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other Gram-negative non-fermenters such as Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Achromobacter xylosoxidans. Accordingly, a great need for new and novel agents for the management of acute exacerbations in CF exists. While several antibiotics have recently been approved or are close to approval for clinical use, frequently their emphasis has been for Gram-positive, and specifically MRSA-related, disease. Despite this, these agents may have a role in CF-related exacerbations. This article reviews the spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetics and clinical and theoretical evidence for the use of newer agents including tigecycline, doripenem and ceftobiprole in the management of CF pulmonary exacerbations. Appropriate use of these agents in CF will require detailed CF-specific pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data.

Topics: Achromobacter denitrificans; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Carbapenems; Cephalosporins; Cystic Fibrosis; Doripenem; Humans; Minocycline; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Staphylococcus aureus; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; Tigecycline

Current antibiotics available for the treatment of healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) may result in clinical failure due to resistance development, side effect intolerance, or poor pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic profiles. New agents active against common HCAP pathogens are needed. The mechanism of action, spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetics, adverse effects, and clinical efficacy of seven new agents in clinical development or recently approved with either methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or pseudomonal activity are reviewed. They include doripenem, a new antipseudomonal carbapenem; ceftobiprole and ceftaroline, two anti-MRSA cephalosporins; iclaprim, a selective dihydrofolate reductase antagonist; and three glycopeptides, dalbavancin, telavancin, and oritavancin.

Topics: Aminoglycosides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Carbapenems; Ceftaroline; Cephalosporins; Cross Infection; Doripenem; Glycopeptides; Lipoglycopeptides; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Pseudomonas Infections; Pyrimidines; Staphylococcal Infections; Teicoplanin

Traditionally, pneumonia is categorized by epidemiologic factors into community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Microbiologic studies have shown that the organisms which cause infections in HAP and VAP differ from CAP in epidemiology and resistance patterns. Patients with HAP or VAP are at higher risk for harboring resistant organisms. Other historical features that potentially place patients at a higher risk for being infected with resistant pathogens and organisms not commonly associated with CAP include history of recent admission to a health care facility, residence in a long-term care or nursing home facility, attendance at a dialysis clinic, history of recent intravenous antibiotic therapy, chemotherapy, and wound care. Because these "risk factors" have health care exposure as a common feature, patients presenting with pneumonia having these historical features have been more recently categorized as having health care-associated pneumonia (HCAP). This publication was prepared by the HCAP Working Group, which is comprised of nationally recognized experts in emergency medicine, infectious diseases, and pulmonary and critical care medicine. The aim of this article is to create awareness of the entity known as HCAP and to provide knowledge of its identification and initial management in the emergency department.

Topics: Acetamides; Age Distribution; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Infective Agents; beta-Lactams; Cephalosporins; Cross Infection; Emergency Treatment; Ertapenem; Female; Humans; Length of Stay; Linezolid; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Minocycline; Oxazolidinones; Patient Care Team; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Respiration, Artificial; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Tigecycline

The advanced-generation, broad-spectrum, intravenous (IV) cephalosporin, ceftobiprole, is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for adults with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) or community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), but its effects in pediatric patients have not been established.. In this multicenter, investigator-blinded, active-controlled, phase 3 study, patients 3 months to <18 years old with HAP or CAP requiring hospitalization were randomized (2:1) to ceftobiprole versus standard-of-care (SoC) IV cephalosporin treatments (ceftazidime or ceftriaxone), with or without vancomycin. After at least 3 days' IV treatment, patients demonstrating clinical improvement could be switched to an oral antibiotic, to complete a minimum of 7 days' treatment.. Overall, 138 patients were randomized to ceftobiprole (n = 94) or a SoC cephalosporin (n = 44). Median time to oral switch was 6.0 days in the ceftobiprole group and 8.0 days in the SoC cephalosporin group. While on IV therapy, adverse events and treatment-related adverse events were reported by 20.2% and 8.5% of ceftobiprole-treated patients and 18.2% and 0% of SoC cephalosporin-treated patients. Early clinical response rates at day 4 in the intention-to-treat population were 95.7% and 93.2% (between-group difference, 2.6%; 95% confidence interval, -5.5% to 14.7%) in the ceftobiprole and comparator groups, and clinical cure rates at the test-of-cure visit were 90.4% and 97.7% (between-group difference, -7.3%; 95% confidence interval, -15.7% to 3.6%), respectively.. Ceftobiprole was well tolerated and, in this small phase 3 study, demonstrated similar efficacy to SoC cephalosporins in pediatric patients with HAP or CAP requiring hospitalization.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Child; Child, Preschool; Cross Infection; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Infant; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Treatment Outcome; Vancomycin

Lay abstract Pneumonia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in East Asia and treatment is complicated by increasing rates of antibiotic resistance in this region. This study analyzed results from two clinical trials that assessed the benefits of the novel antibiotic ceftobiprole in patients from mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan and South Korea. In East Asian patients with either community- or hospital-acquired pneumonia, outcomes following ceftobiprole treatment were similar to those achieved with established antibiotics. There was also an indication that ceftobiprole may improve the rate at which causative bacteria were eradicated and may potentially reduce mortality rates compared with other antibiotics. Ceftobiprole was well tolerated in this population and will be a useful option for the treatment of pneumonia in East Asia.

Topics: Asia, Eastern; Cephalosporins; Community-Acquired Infections; Cross Infection; Humans; Pneumonia, Bacterial

Ceftobiprole is an advance generation cephalosporin which has broad-spectrum bacterial activity (both against Gram-positive and negative pathogens) and was approved for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and non-ventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) in most European countries. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ceftobiprole in the treatment of pneumonia in a cohort of severely ill patients admitted to the emergency department (ED).. 1-year observational retrospective mono-centric study. Were defined two primary endpoints: first, to evaluate the clinical cure at the test-of-cure (TOC); the second, to evaluate the early improvement, defined as a reduction of symptoms and inflammatory parameters 72 hours after the start of treatment. The secondary endpoint is to evaluate the reduction of antibiotic "burden" using ceftobiprole despite standard of care in severe hospital-acquired pneumonia.. During the study period, a total of 48 patients with severe pneumonia received ceftobiprole: twenty-two patients (45.8%) as empiric therapy, 9 (18.5%) as a de-escalation option from previous combination therapies, 13 patients (27.1%) as an escalation therapy from ceftriaxone or amoxicillin/clavulanate and four patients (8.3%) as a targeted therapy based on microbiological results. Ceftobiprole mean duration therapy was 10.2 days. Forty-six patients with severe pneumonia had an early clinical improvement 72 hours after the start of treatment (95.8%). In general, ceftobiprole was well tolerated; only one patient suspended the drug because of poor tolerability. The clinical cure at TOC was 85.4% and 30-days crude mortality was 10.4%.. This study confirms that ceftobiprole is effective in severely ill patients with pneumonia at risk of poor outcomes.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Community-Acquired Infections; Comorbidity; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Retrospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index

To determine the prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus from hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) in Italy and the susceptibility to ceftobiprole and comparators of MSSA and MRSA isolates. A secondary objective was to characterize the clonality and acquired resistance and virulence genes of MRSA.. Consecutive non-replicate isolates from HAP were collected from 13 laboratories distributed across Italy, from January to May 2016. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution, and results were interpreted according to the EUCAST breakpoints. All MRSA isolates were subjected to WGS using an Illumina platform. Clonality and resistance and virulence gene content were investigated with bioinformatics tools.. Among 333 isolates from HAP, S. aureus was the third most common pathogen (18.6%). The proportion of MRSA was 40.3%. Susceptibility to ceftobiprole was 100% for MSSA and 95.5% for MRSA. Lower susceptibility rates of 78.4% and 94.6% in MSSA and 36.4% and 12.1% in MRSA isolates were observed for erythromycin and levofloxacin, respectively. The MRSA from HAP mostly belonged to clonal complex (CC) 22 (47.0%), CC5 (25.8%) and CC8 (15.2%), with a minority of other lineages (ST1, ST6, ST7, ST30, ST152 and ST398). Acquired resistance and virulence genes in most cases exhibited a clonal distribution. The three ceftobiprole-resistant isolates exhibited an MIC of 4 mg/L and belonged to ST228-MRSA-I of CC5.. S. aureus is an important cause of HAP in Italy. Ceftobiprole exhibited good in vitro activity against S. aureus isolated from HAP, including MRSA. A trend to replacement of ST228 with ST22 was noticed compared with previous studies.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Typing Techniques; Cephalosporins; Cross Infection; DNA, Bacterial; Humans; Italy; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Molecular Epidemiology; Multilocus Sequence Typing; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Prevalence; Public Health Surveillance; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus aureus; Virulence; Whole Genome Sequencing

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteremia; Ceftaroline; Cephalosporins; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Gram-Positive Bacteria; Humans; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Pseudomonas; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus aureus

Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) of antimicrobial dosage regimens during drug development to derive predicted target attainment values is frequently used to choose the optimal dose for the treatment of patients in phase 2 and 3 studies. A criticism is that pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter estimates and variability in healthy volunteers are smaller than those in patients. In this study, the initial estimates of exposure from MCS were compared with actual exposure data in patients treated with ceftobiprole in a phase 3 nosocomial-pneumonia (NP) study (NTC00210964). Results of MCS using population PK data from ceftobiprole derived from 12 healthy volunteers were used (J. W. Mouton, A. Schmitt-Hoffmann, S. Shapiro, N. Nashed, N. C. Punt, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:1713-1718, 2004). Actual individual exposures in patients were derived after building a population pharmacokinetic model and were used to calculate the individual exposure to ceftobiprole (the percentage of time the unbound concentration exceeds the MIC [percent fT > MIC]) for a range of MIC values. For the ranges of percent fT > MIC used to determine the dosage schedule in the phase 3 NP study, the MCS using data from a single phase 1 study in healthy volunteers accurately predicted the actual clinical exposure to ceftobiprole. The difference at 50% fT > MIC at an MIC of 4 mg/liter was 3.5% for PK-sampled patients. For higher values of percent fT > MIC and MICs, the MCS slightly underestimated the target attainment, probably due to extreme values in the PK profile distribution used in the simulations. The probability of target attainment based on MCS in healthy volunteers adequately predicted the actual exposures in a patient population, including severely ill patients.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Cross Infection; Drug Dosage Calculations; Female; Humans; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Monte Carlo Method; Pneumonia, Bacterial

Ceftobiprole (BAL9141) is an investigational cephalosporin active against methicillin- and vancomycin-resistant staphylococci administered as a water-soluble prodrug, ceftobiprole medocaril (BAL5788). Using an immunocompetent murine pneumonia model of Haemophilus influenzae, Enterobacter cloacae, or extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) nonproducing or producing Klebsiella pneumoniae pneumonia, we compared results of treatment with ceftobiprole medocaril (71 mg/kg, sc, qid), ceftriaxone (50 mg/kg, im, bid), or cefepime (50 mg/kg, ip, q.i.d.). Results were expressed as median and 25th to 75th percentile log10 colony forming units per gram of lung tissue. Ceftobiprole, ceftriaxone, and cefepime were each more active than was no treatment and were equally active for treatment of experimental H. influenzae, E. cloacae, or ESBL-nonproducing K. pneumoniae pneumonia. For ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae, no differences were detected between no treatment and treatment with ceftobiprole, ceftriaxone, or cefepime. Ceftobiprole is active against H. influenzae, E. cloacae, and ESBL-nonproducing K. pneumoniae in an immunocompetent experimental murine pneumonia model.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Enterobacter cloacae; Female; Haemophilus influenzae; Immunocompetence; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Mice; Models, Animal; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Statistics, Nonparametric; Tissue Distribution