ceftobiprole and Endocarditis

Ceftobiprole (CFB), especially in combination, could be a promising alternative treatment for infective endocarditis. A main determinant of clinical response to antibiotic treatment is drug concentration at the infected site. Data on CFB and Daptomycin (DPT) heart valve penetration are lacking.Here we report a clinical case of CFB and DPT treatment combination for endocarditis. Then, we measured CFB and DPT concentrations in a native infected valve to verify their pharmacokinetic penetration and relationship with pharmacodynamic microbiological markers.The isolated microorganism was a MRSA with CFB and DPT MIC < 2 mg/L and <1 mg/L, respectively. The CFB and DPT plasma concentrations were 36.2 and 14.1 mg/L, respectively and the extrapolated concentration, based on each half-life, at the operatory time were 16.4 and 19.1 mg/L for CFB and DPT, respectively; the corresponding median CFB and DPT valve concentrations were 2.26 (IQR 2.14-2.69) and 12.9 µg/g (IQR 5.69-20.9), respectively; the estimated tissue/plasma ratios for CFB and DTP were 0.14 and 0.67, respectively.The association of CFB and DPT showed a good efficacy in this single endocarditis clinical case, confirmed by plasma and tissue PK/PD data.This report shows the first data on CFB valve tissue penetration, and it needs to be confirmed in other patient valve tissues. Moreover, relative studies of correlation with clinical efficacy are needed.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Daptomycin; Endocarditis; Endocarditis, Bacterial; Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Staphylococcal Infections

Ceftobiprole is a relatively new cephalosporin with broad-spectrum activity and good tolerability. Despite its promising characteristics, to our knowledge, only two case reports, previously published also by some of us, is available concerning its administration for the treatment of infective endocarditis. Hereby we report our experience in this field.. All the patients with infective endocarditis treated with ceftobiprole were enrolled.. 12 cases of endocarditis were treated with ceftobiprole, 11/12 in combination with daptomycin and 1/12 as monotherapy. Gram-positive bacteria were isolated in 12/12 patients; 3 cases were polymicrobial. Cure rate was 83% (10/12 patients). In 9/12 (75%) cases, patients were switched to ceftobiprole following failure of previous antimicrobial regimen. In 3/3 patients in which ceftobiprole was administered because of persistently positive blood culture, bacteraemia clearance was rapidly achieved.. Ceftobiprole, especially in combination, could be a promising alternative treatment for infective endocarditis.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cephalosporins; Daptomycin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Endocarditis; Female; Gram-Positive Bacteria; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Daptomycin; Endocarditis; Humans; Male; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Salvage Therapy; Staphylococcal Infections; Treatment Outcome

The efficacy of ceftobiprole combined with vancomycin was tested against two vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) strains, PC3 and Mu50, in rats with experimental endocarditis. Animals with infected aortic vegetations were treated for 3 days with doses simulating the kinetics after intravenous administration in humans of (i) the standard dose of ceftobiprole of 500 mg every 12 h (b.i.d.) (SD-ceftobiprole), (ii) a low dose of ceftobiprole of 250 mg b.i.d. (LD-ceftobiprole), (iii) a very low dose of ceftobiprole of 125 mg b.i.d. (VLD-ceftobiprole), (iv) SD-vancomycin of 1 g b.i.d., or (v) LD- or VLD-ceftobiprole combined with SD-vancomycin. Low dosages of ceftobiprole were purposely used to highlight positive drug interactions. Treatment with SD-ceftobiprole sterilized 12 of 14 (86%) and 10 of 13 (77%) vegetations infected with PC3 and Mu50, respectively (P < 0.001 versus controls). In comparison, LD-ceftobiprole sterilized 10 of 11 (91%) vegetations infected with PC3 (P < 0.01 versus controls) but only 3 of 12 (25%) vegetations infected with Mu50 (P > 0.05 versus controls). VLD-ceftobiprole and SD-vancomycin alone were ineffective against both strains (≤8% sterile vegetations). In contrast, the combination of VLD-ceftobiprole and SD-vancomycin sterilized 7 of 9 (78%) and 6 of 14 (43%) vegetations infected with PC3 and Mu50, respectively, and the combination of LD-ceftobiprole and SD-vancomycin sterilized 5 of 6 (83%) vegetations infected with Mu50 (P < 0.05 versus controls and monotherapy). Thus, ceftobiprole monotherapy simulating standard therapeutic doses was active against VISA experimental endocarditis. Moreover, subtherapeutic LD- and VLD-ceftobiprole synergized with ineffective vancomycin to restore efficacy. Hence, combining ceftobiprole with vancomycin broadens the therapeutic margin of these two compounds against VISA infections.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Drug Synergism; Endocarditis; Female; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Staphylococcus aureus; Vancomycin