cefroxadine and Urinary-Tract-Infections

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and utility of cefroxadine (CXD) for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, a double blind study comparing CXD with cephalexin (CEX) was carried out. Patient received either 1,500 mg/day of CXD 3 times a day, or 2,000 mg/day of CEX 4 times a day for 5 days by oral route, and the following results were obtained. Of the 305 patients, clinical efficacies were evaluated in 220 cases (CXD 105 cases, CEX 115 cases) except that excluded or dropped out. Side effect was evaluated in 301 cases (CXD 150 cases, CEX 151 cases). There was no statistically significant difference in the back ground characteristics between the 2 groups. Overall clinical assessment by the committee according to the "Criteria for Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Antimicrobial Agents on Urinary Tract Infection" patients evaluated as better than "good" were 64 of 105 (61.0%) for CXD and 75 of 115 (65.2%) for CEX. The difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant. In effect on pyuria, patients evaluated as better than "decreased" were 58 of 105 (55.2%) for CXD and 69 of 115 (60.0%) for CEX. The difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant. In effect of bacteriuria, patients evaluated as better than "decreased" were 57 of 105 (54.3%) for CXD and 69 of 115 (60.0%) for CEX. The difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant. Analyses were stratified according to classification by the type of infection, diagnosis, degree of pyuria before treatment, and bacterial count before treatment. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 treatment groups as to any item. In evaluation by attending physician, patients evaluated as better than "good" were 81 of 140 (57.9%) for CXD, and 85 of 141 (60.3%) for CEX. Statistically significant difference was not observed between the 2 groups. In drug usefulness by attending physician, patients evaluated as better than "usefulness" were 106 of 140 (75.7%) for CXD, and 109 of 141 (77.3%) for CEX. The difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant. In evaluation of the infections with sensitive species to both CXD and CEX by the committee according to "Criteria for Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Antimicrobial Agents on Urinary Tract Infections, overall clinical efficacies were evaluated in 102 (CXD 48 cases, CEX 54 cases) which were infected with sensitive species. There was no statistically significant difference

Topics: Adult; Aged; Bacteria; Cephalexin; Cephalosporins; Cephradine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Urinary Tract Infections

Cefroxadine and cephalexin were compared in a double-blind study in patients with complicated urinary tract infections. Patients were treated orally with 1 g t.i.d. for five days. Bacterial counts in the urine were determined 1, 3 and 8 hours after the first dose and on the second, third and fifth day of treatment. A decrease in the bacterial population below 10(4) organisms/ml of urine was taken as being indicative of chemotherapeutic effect. Urine specimens were inactivated enzymatically before culture to eliminate any residual cephalosporin. A significant reduction in the bacterial count was seen one and three hours after the first dose, and, to a much greater extent, after eight hours. Reduction in the bacterial count was more frequent in the group treated with cefroxadine. The results during the first eight hours indicate that cefroxadine kills more rapidly than cephalexin, which is in agreement with the experimental findings. Whether the transient differences observed in the rates of inhibition are of clinical relevance remains uncertain.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Bacterial Infections; Bacteriuria; Cephalexin; Cephalosporins; Cephradine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Double-Blind Method; Escherichia coli; Female; Humans; Kinetics; Klebsiella; Male; Middle Aged; Proteus mirabilis; Urinary Tract Infections; Urine

The new semi-synthetic oral cephalosporin, CGP 9,000, has been evaluated in a large number of hospitalized patients with urinary infections. A total of 57 of these patients suffering from concomitant diabetes was matched with an equal number of non-diabetic patients. Patients were treated for 10 days with either 500 mg or 1.0 g CGP, or 1.0 g cephalexin. The predominant pathogens isolated were E. coli, Strep. faecalis, Proteus mirabilis and Klebsiella spp. Comparison of the results showed that the eradication rate was similar in diabetic and non-diabetic patients and there were no significant differences between the three treatment groups. There was a similar improvement in pyuria, and therapeutic response was equally as good in diabetic patients on 500 mg CGP 9,000 per day as in non-diabetic patients and in the other treatment groups. No unwanted effects on renal function were observed in the high-risk diabetic group.

Topics: Aged; Cephalexin; Cephalosporins; Cephradine; Diabetes Complications; Female; Humans; Kidney Function Tests; Male; Middle Aged; Urinary Tract Infections

Basic and clinical evaluations of cefroxadine were carried out in children, and the following results were obtained. 1. Cefroxadine 20 mg/kg was administered to 9 children with heart disease for the prophylaxis against infections before undergoing cardiocatheterization and cardioangiography, and serum levels were determined. Peak levels reached after 30 minutes in 4 of the 9 cases, with a mean peak level of 22.5 mcg/ml and after 1 hour in 5 cases, with a mean peak level of 16.2 mcg/ml. Half life was 3.1 hours in the former group in a 6-hour blood sampling (1.04 hours in a 2-hour sampling) while in the latter group it was 1.37 hours. 2. Clinical responses were evaluated in 56 children comprising 23 cases of pharyngitis, 8 of tonsillitis, 13 of scarlet fever, 10 of urinary tract infections and 2 of impetigo. Fifty of these cases had excellent and good responses showing a efficacy rate of 89.3%. 3. From 42 of the cases, 43 strains were isolated as causative organisms. Major organisms included 27 strains of S. pyogenes, 9 of E. coli and 3 of S. aureus. As for bacteriological responses, all strains were eradicated. 4. No severe side effects were observed except for diarrhea of 1 cases and eosinophilia of 2 cases. Furthermore, no children refused to take cefroxadine dry syrup.

Topics: Cephalosporins; Cephradine; Child; Child, Preschool; Dosage Forms; Drug Evaluation; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Respiratory Tract Infections; Urinary Tract Infections