cefoxitin and Obesity

The objective of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of a weight-based cefoxitin dosing regimen for surgical prophylaxis in obese patients. Patients received a single dose of cefoxitin at 40 mg/kg based on total body weight. Cefoxitin samples were obtained over 3 h from serum and adipose tissue, and concentrations were determined by validated high-performance liquid chromatography. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed, followed by Monte Carlo simulations to estimate probability of target attainment (PTA) for Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Bacteroides fragilis over 4-h periods postdose. Thirty patients undergoing bariatric procedures were enrolled. The body mass index (mean ± standard deviation [SD])was 45.9 ± 8.0 kg/m(2) (range, 35.0 to 76.7 kg/m(2)); the median cefoxitin dose was 5 g (range, 4.0 to 7.5 g). The mean maximum concentrations were 216.15 ± 41.80 μg/ml in serum and 12.62 ± 5.89 in tissue; the mean tissue/serum ratio was 8% ± 3%. In serum, weight-based regimens achieved ≥90% PTA (goal time during which free [unbound] drug concentrations exceed pathogen MICs [fT>MIC] of 100%) for E. coli and S. aureus over 2 h and for B. fragilis over 1 h; in tissue this regimen failed to achieve goal PTA at any time point. The 40-mg/kg regimens achieved higher PTAs over longer periods in both serum and tissue than did the standard 2-g doses. However, although weight-based cefoxitin regimens were better than fixed doses, achievement of desired pharmacodynamic targets was suboptimal in both serum and tissue. Alternative dosing regimens and agents should be explored in order to achieve more favorable antibiotic performance during surgical prophylaxis in obese patients.

Topics: Adult; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Body Weight; Cefoxitin; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Monte Carlo Method; Obesity; Obesity, Morbid; Surgical Wound Infection; Tissue Distribution

Clinical practice guidelines recommend a 2-g dose of cefotetan and cefoxitin for surgical prophylaxis. Pharmacokinetic data suggest benefit from higher cefotetan and cefoxitin dosing in obese patients. However, clinical studies examining higher dosing strategies in this at-risk population are lacking. The purpose of this study was to determine whether 3 g of cefotetan or cefoxitin administered pre-operatively for patients who weigh 120 kg or more is associated with a lower proportion of surgical site infection (SSI) compared with 2 g.. Medical records of patients weighing 120 kg or more who had received cefotetan or cefoxitin (2 or 3 g) as surgical prophylaxis for intra-abdominal procedures between July 2012 and August 2015 were reviewed for the development of an SSI (primary outcome), study drug-related adverse events, and re-admissions attributed to SSIs (secondary outcomes). Relative risk calculations were performed for analysis of the primary and secondary outcomes.. This small retrospective study did not find a difference in SSI rates between 3-g and 2-g surgical prophylaxis dosing for patients 120 kg or more with a median BMI >40 kg/m

Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Cefotetan; Cefoxitin; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Patient Readmission; Preoperative Care; Retrospective Studies; Surgical Wound Infection; Treatment Outcome

Antibiotic dosing in obese surgical patients has not been adequately evaluated. The objective of this study was to identify whether currently prescribed doses of cefoxitin achieve adequate and sustained plasma and tissue concentrations in obese patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy.. A prospective evaluation of plasma and tissue cefoxitin concentrations in patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy was performed. On the day of the surgical procedure, venous blood samples (5 mL) were collected just before cefoxitin administration and then at 5, 30, 60, 120, and 240 minutes after dose administration. In addition, subcutaneous adipose tissue was collected from the surgical site at the time of surgical incision and at closure. Cefoxitin concentrations in the collected samples were quantified by using an HPLC-ultraviolet method. A standard noncompartmental analysis was performed for each individual cefoxitin plasma concentration-time profile. In addition, the ratio of tissue to plasma concentration was calculated for all patients.. Plasma and tissue pharmacokinetics of cefoxitin were evaluated in 6 patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy. The mean age and BMI were 48.7 (6.2) years and 42.8 (7.1) kg/m(2), respectively. At the time of surgical closure, subcutaneous adipose tissue concentrations of cefoxitin were subtherapeutic (<8 µg/mL) in all evaluated patients.. Current dosing strategies for cefoxitin in obese surgical patients may be inadequate, and there is an urgent need to define the appropriate dosage.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Body Mass Index; Cefoxitin; Female; Gastrectomy; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Prospective Studies; Skin Diseases, Bacterial; Soft Tissue Infections; Subcutaneous Fat

Obesity is a significant risk factor for surgical site infections (SSIs), for poorly understood reasons. SSIs are a major cause of morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and increased health care cost. Drug disposition in general is frequently altered in the obese. Preoperative antibiotic administration, achieving adequate tissue concentrations at the time of incision, is an essential strategy to prevent SSIs. Nonetheless, there is little information regarding antibiotic concentrations in obese surgical patients. This investigation tested the hypothesis that the prophylactic antibiotic cefoxitin may have delayed and/or diminished tissue penetration in the obese.. Plasma and tissue concentrations of cefoxitin were determined in obese patients undergoing abdominal and pelvic surgery (body mass index 43 ± 10 kg/m(2), n = 14, 2 g cefoxitin) and in normal-weight patients and healthy volunteers (body mass index 20 ± 2 kg/m(2), n = 13, 1 g cefoxitin). Tissue concentrations were measured using a microdialysis probe in the subcutaneous layer of the abdomen, and in adipose tissue excised at the time of incision and wound closure.. Plasma concentrations and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were approximately 2-fold higher in the obese patients because of the 2-fold-higher dose. Dose-normalized concentrations were higher, although AUCs were not significantly different. Measured and dose-normalized subcutaneous cefoxitin concentrations and AUCs in the obese patients were significantly lower than in the normal-weight subjects. There was an inverse relationship between cefoxitin tissue penetration (AUC(tissue)/AUC(plasma) ratio) and body mass index. Tissue penetration was substantially lower in the obese patients (0.08 ± 0.07 vs 0.37 ± 0.26, P < 0.05). Adipose tissue cefoxitin concentrations in obese patients were only 7.8 ± 7.3 and 2.7 ± 1.4 μg/g, respectively, at incision and closure, below the minimum inhibitory concentration of 8 and 16 μg/mL, respectively, for aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms.. Obese surgical patients have impaired tissue penetration of the prophylactic antibiotic cefoxitin, and inadequate tissue concentrations despite increased clinical dose (2 g). Inadequate tissue antibiotic concentrations may be a factor in the increased risk of SSIs in obese surgical patients. Additional studies are needed to define doses achieving adequate tissue concentrations.

Topics: Abdomen; Adipose Tissue; Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Area Under Curve; Body Mass Index; Case-Control Studies; Cefoxitin; Female; Humans; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Microdialysis; Middle Aged; Missouri; Obesity; Pelvis; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Surgical Wound Infection; Tissue Distribution; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult