cefotaxime and Communicable-Diseases

In France, conjugated pneumococcal vaccination has considerably modified the profile of pneumococcal meningitis by eliminating the most virulent strains resistant to beta-lactams. Over recent years, the nationwide pediatric meningitis network of the Pediatric Infectious Disease Group (GPIP) and the National Reference Centre of Pneumococci have not recorded any cases of meningitis due to pneumococcus resistant to third-generation cephalosporins (C3G), even though in 2021, strains with a less favorable profile appeared to emerge. These recent data justify renewal of the 2016 recommendations and limitation of vancomycin to the secondary phase of treatment of pneumococcal meningitis when the MIC of the isolated strain against injectable C3Gs is >0.5 mg/L. The only major change proposed by the GPIP in this 2023 update of its recommendations is discontinuation of the recommendation of a combination of ciprofloxacin and cefotaxime in Escherichia coli meningitis in newborns and young infants. The nationwide observatory of meningitis in children is a valuable tool because of its completeness and its continuity over the past 15 years. The maintenance of epidemiological surveillance will allow us to adapt new therapeutic regimens to the evolution of pneumococcal susceptibility profiles and to future serotype-specific changes. Community-acquired cerebral abscesses are rare diseases, of which the management requires a rigorous approach: high-quality imaging, bacteriological sampling prior to antibiotic therapy whenever possible, and antibiotic treatment including metronidazole in addition to cefotaxime. Multidisciplinary collaboration, including infectious disease and neurosurgical advice, is always called for.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefotaxime; Child; Communicable Diseases; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Meningitis, Pneumococcal; Streptococcus pneumoniae

Community-acquired non-complicated acute pyelonephritis (APN) is a frequent, occasionally serious infection (around 20% of the cases are bacteremic) that usually requires hospital admission. The third generation oral cephalosporins which are active against more than 95% of E. coli strains should allow the outpatient management of these patients.. To evaluate the bacteriological and clinical efficacy of oral cefixime in comparison to amoxicilin plus netilcilin in the treatment of APN.. Patients older than 18 years affected by APN were included in a fourteen month prospective study. According to a random numbers chart, the patients received cefixime (400 mg/24 h in a single daily dose for 12 days) or amoxicilin (1 g/8 h per os) plus netilmicin (4 mg/kg/24 h in a single intramuscular daily dose) during five days followed by 7 days of an oral treatment chosen according to the susceptibility pattern of isolated microorganism.. Sixty-one patients received cefixime and 65 amoxicillin plus retilmicin. There were no significant differences between both groups of patients. Thirty-two patients presented bacteremia (25.4%). The mean (SD) eak and trough concentrations of netilmicin were 11.4 (2.8) mg/l and 0.38 (0.4) mg/l, respectively. Clinical response was favorable in 97% of patients treated with cefixime and in 98% of those treated with amoxicilin plus netilmicin (p = NS). The infection recurred in 10 out of 59 patients (16.9%) in the cefixime arm of the study and in 9 out of 64 patients (14%) treated with amoxicillin plus netilmicin (p = NS). Tolerance to the study drugs was good in both arms of the study, and renal function remained normal.. Cefixime seems to be an acceptable alternative to the regimens containing an aminopenicillin and an aminoglycoside for the treatment of community-acquired non-complicated APN.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Amoxicillin; Bacteremia; Cefixime; Cefotaxime; Cephalosporins; Communicable Diseases; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Netilmicin; Pyelonephritis

In neonates, β-Lactam antibiotics are almost exclusively administered by intermittent infusion. However, continuous or prolonged infusion may be more beneficial because of the time-dependent antibacterial activity. In this pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic simulation study, we aimed to compare treatment with continuous, extended and intermittent infusion of β-lactam antibiotics for neonates with infectious diseases.. We selected population pharmacokinetic models of penicillin G, amoxicillin, flucloxacillin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime and meropenem, and performed a Monte Carlo simulation with 30,000 neonates. Four different dosing regimens were simulated: intermittent infusion in 30 min, prolonged infusion in 4 h, continuous infusion, and continuous infusion with a loading dose. The primary endpoint was 90% probability of target attainment (PTA) for 100% ƒT>MIC during the first 48 h of treatment.. For all antibiotics except cefotaxime, continuous infusion with a loading dose resulted in a higher PTA compared with other dosing regimens. Sufficient exposure (PTA >90%) using continuous infusion with a loading dose was reached for amoxicillin (90.3%), penicillin G (PTA 98.4%), flucloxacillin (PTA 94.3%), cefotaxime (PTA 100%), and ceftazidime (PTA 100%). Independent of dosing regimen, higher meropenem (PTA for continuous infusion with a loading dose of 85.5%) doses might be needed to treat severe infections in neonates. Ceftazidime and cefotaxime dose might be unnecessarily high, as even with dose reductions, a PTA > 90% was retained.. Continuous infusion after a loading dose leads to a higher PTA compared with continuous, intermittent or prolonged infusion, and therefore has the potential to improve treatment with β-lactam antibiotics in neonates.

Topics: Amoxicillin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefotaxime; Ceftazidime; Communicable Diseases; Floxacillin; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infusions, Intravenous; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Monobactams; Monte Carlo Method

Cefotaxime has been used for the management of neonatal infections since the 1990s for suspected meningitis and to mitigate gentamicin-associated renal injury. Its shortage in 2015 and subsequent removal from the U.S. pharmaceutical market forced providers to consider alternatives. Ceftriaxone, a cephalosporin with an identical antibacterial spectrum of activity to cefotaxime, is contraindicated in neonates due to its risk of biliary pseudolithiasis. Ceftazidime was recommended as an alternative by the American Academy of Pediatrics but is inequivalent.. This article addresses indications for cephalosporin use and considerations when selecting an alternative to cefotaxime. Differences among cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, and cefepime are discussed and compared to the standard-of-care presumptive regimen, ampicillin, and gentamicin. The authors consider the data behind the neonatal contraindication to ceftriaxone and provide recommendations for their application to practice.. The data against ceftriaxone use in neonates remain poor, particularly in the context of the cefotaxime shortage and lack of an equivalent alternative. Ceftriaxone could be considered in low-risk neonates without hyperbilirubinemia or exposure to calcium-containing fluids on a case-by-case basis. Ceftazidime monotherapy for presumptive management of neonatal infections is inappropriate; cefepime should be more frequently utilized in neonates who are poor candidates for ceftriaxone.

Topics: Ampicillin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Calcium; Cefepime; Cefotaxime; Ceftazidime; Ceftriaxone; Cephalosporins; Communicable Diseases; Gentamicins; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Newborn, Diseases; Microbial Sensitivity Tests

Topics: Cefotaxime; Cephalosporins; Child; Child, Preschool; Communicable Diseases; Female; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Newborn, Diseases; Male